education program consists of about 35credit hours, or 29% of a 120-hour curriculum. This percentage is significantly different fromthe figures cited by Stouffer and Russell.From the Ratcliff survey, 61.3% of the schools report content requirements in literature, 60.7%in History, 60.6% in Philosophy and Ethics, 46.9% in Foreign Languages. Further, in keepingwith the understanding that cognitive areas (and related outcomes) are as important as contentareas, Ratcliff’s survey reveals that 91% of the schools report goals in the area of critical readingand writing, 72% in critical thinking, 63% in speaking and listening, 67% in cultural diversityand 55% in global studies. While the Ratcliff study provides a picture of goals in generaleducation, it is
.” Journal of Engineering Education. Vol. 94, No. 1, Pp. 103-120.4 Van der Poel, Ibo and Peter-Paul Verbeek, Guest Editors. 2006. Special Issue of Science, Technology, and Human Values on “Ethics and Engineering Design.” Vol. 31, No. 3 (May).5 E.g., Grasso, Domenico, Kara M. Callahan, and Sandra Doucett. 2004. “Defining Engineering Thought.” International Journal of Engineering Education. Vol. 20, No. 3, Pp. 412-415.6 Winner, Langdon. 1980. “Do Artefacts Have Politics?” Daedalus. Vol. 109, Pp. 121-36.7 Winner, Langdon. 1995. “Political Ergonomics.” In Richard Buchanan and Victor Margolin, Editors. Discovering Design. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Pp. 146-70.8 Ibid, p. 151.9 Ibid, p. 165.10 Ibid, p
; and exploring economic and ethical issues associated with nanomanufacturing. Aprofessional development component was also designed into the 10 week research program,which has morphed over the past three years, based on evaluation of students at the end of theirsummer experience.REU ProgramThe NSF Nanoscale Science and Engineering Center for High-rate Nanomanufacturing (CHN)focuses on nanomanufacturing research is an equal partnership among three universities(Northeastern University, the University of Massachusetts Lowell (UML), and the University ofNew Hampshire) that are located about an hour’s drive apart. For the last three summers, theCenter has held a Research Experiences for Undergraduates (REU) program. The participantsspent 10 weeks
roughly at the beginning, middle, and end of thesemester. Each Reflection assignment included seven to ten questions, and the three questionsused in the current analysis were: The Solution Question: Included on Reflection One, Question Six “Is there more than one way to solve the problem your [team] faces? What are other possible solutions? How do you know which one is best? Can you ever be completely sure that solution is the one that should be implemented?” The Ethics Question: Included on Reflection Three, Question Three “What other possible solutions are there to the ethical problem? Which solution to the ethical problem do you think is best and why? How confident are you in the solution
guidelines for student portfolios have evolved over the last decade as moreprofessional attention has been given to the nature and purpose of a portfolio as part of studentwork in engineering. Key motivators that have improved professionalism in portfolios includeincreased attention to issues of accreditation and ethics and to the requirement of life-longlearning as a professional obligation. These elements of “portfolio thinking” usually reside wellwithin the bounds of engineering education. 1, 10, 12However, as the world becomes more complicated, knowledge and experience beyond thetechnical must be exhibited by an engineering professional. Increased awareness of theimportance of fields outside engineering – those academic subjects usually grouped
professional issuesassociated with the practice of engineering. The course also examines the economic, political andsocial issues that frame the project delivery process. Professionalism, ethics, communications,and leadership skill development were threaded throughout the course. Though specificallydeveloped and aimed for civil and environmental engineers, course materials are applicable tomost areas of engineering and science. This paper presents an overview of the course and provides specific examples of differentpedagogical methods and tools used for topic and course delivery. In addition to exams andassignments, a number of term projects were completed, allowing students to actively apply theskills discussed. Some of the pedagogical
professional issuesassociated with the practice of engineering. The course also examines the economic, political andsocial issues that frame the project delivery process. Professionalism, ethics, communications,and leadership skill development were threaded throughout the course. Though specificallydeveloped and aimed for civil and environmental engineers, course materials are applicable tomost areas of engineering and science. This paper presents an overview of the course and provides specific examples of differentpedagogical methods and tools used for topic and course delivery. In addition to exams andassignments, a number of term projects were completed, allowing students to actively apply theskills discussed. Some of the pedagogical
professional issuesassociated with the practice of engineering. The course also examines the economic, political andsocial issues that frame the project delivery process. Professionalism, ethics, communications,and leadership skill development were threaded throughout the course. Though specificallydeveloped and aimed for civil and environmental engineers, course materials are applicable tomost areas of engineering and science. This paper presents an overview of the course and provides specific examples of differentpedagogical methods and tools used for topic and course delivery. In addition to exams andassignments, a number of term projects were completed, allowing students to actively apply theskills discussed. Some of the pedagogical
Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology (HST). She received a Ph.D. in Medical Engineering from the HST (1994). Dr. Greenberg’s interests include signal processing for hearing aids and cochlear implants, as well as research in bioengineering education.Mark Bourgeois, Northwestern University Mark Bourgeois is a PhD student in Philosophy at Loyola University Chicago as well as the Administrator of the Northwestern site of the VaNTH ERC. He teaches ethics in biomedical engineering courses at Northwestern and in the VaNTH summer REU program, as well as a dedicated course in ethics in regulation in the Northwestern School of Continuing Studies graduate program
nuclearenergy to raise awareness of nuclear power and its related issues in security, safety, and nuclearenvironmental protection.Course modules are developed to supplement a required freshman engineering course GEEN 100Engineering Design and Ethics (Introduction to Engineering). The modules give an overview ofnuclear engineering to students to broaden their career options. Two new elective courses arebeing developed. An engineering elective is for engineering seniors on nuclear energy andnuclear engineering. It is intended to prepare students for the workforce and/or graduate studiesin the nuclear engineering field. The second elective is for all majors, and it will focus on energyfor America's future, covering nuclear energy among other alternatives
articulate their assumptions regarding the purpose(s)of engineering education, the role of sustainability in the engineering curriculum, and therelationship between sustainability and the “ethics” and “environmental awareness” criteriaposed by the engineers’ accreditation agency (ABET 2005). Specifically, electronic dialogicjournals will be created that allow select engineering faculty to share their pedagogical ideology,to explore the relationship between the technological content that they teach and the objectivesand outcomes required by ABET, and to articulate the methods and goals they have for shapingour students’ philosophical perspectives as regards sustainability.Word count: 199
(CEE 4601) is a senior-level holistically-oriented course designed toexpose mature undergraduate students to a wide range of practical aspects in the profession ofengineering, including the following: Page 13.1004.2- An examination of self-abilities and interests- Leadership and management- Organizational structure and theory- Management of self- Management of others- Communications (verbal and written)- Teams, groups, and group thinking- Project management- Ethics in engineering- Marketing professional technical services- A global view of the emerging engineering marketplaceAn Examination of Self-abilities and InterestsFor
is the co-coodinator of the first semester engineering course at Virginia Tech, and her research interests include undergraduate research, curriculum development and engineering ethics instruction. Page 13.231.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 Assessing Students’ Learning Outcomes during Summer Undergraduate Research ExperiencesAbstractHighly promoted and funded by NSF and other agencies, undergraduate research experienceshave many benefits to students and also present a great opportunity for them to learn globallycompetitive skills. Having recruited 22 NSF REU sites
at Virginia Tech. Dr. Lo is the co-coodinator of the first semester engineering course at Virginia Tech, and her research interests include undergraduate research, curriculum development and engineering ethics instruction. Page 13.993.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 Preliminary Findings from a Quantitative Study: What are Students Learning During Cooperative Education Experiences?AbstractSince most of our engineering students follow careers in industry, of particular importance ishow cooperative experiences help to make better engineers. Although cooperative experiencesare
topicscovered and the variety between them caused a great deal of discontinuity in the course material.Therefore, the new structure emphasizes subjects where engineering tools are used to solve ordisseminate the course material in modules that are interrelated and reinforced throughout thecourse. In the first course, three subject modules were created for this purpose: • Engineering Design and Analysis • Engineering Ethics • Engineering SustainabilityIn the first course, students will use engineering skills such as the problem solving method andstatistical analyses while completing design activities. They will analyze and communicate theirresults in a technical poster competition. The second course builds on previously learned skillswith the
teach about the engineering profession and the field of electricalengineering. Activities included laboratories in electrical circuits, designing an electric car,soldering, a field trip, and discussion about ethics. Students worked in two and four-personteams, and made presentations on their experiences.The academy was evaluated using formal assessment instruments and faculty observations. Eachof the individual activities attained an overall rating of at least 4 on a scale of 1 to 5, with mostactivities rated at 4.5 or greater. A formal evaluation of the entire academy revealed ratings of4.5 or greater out of 5 on most aspects of the academy, though some areas indicated a need forimprovement, such as clarity of written materials and the
-world reinforcementof sustainable engineering practices and promotes the education of ethically responsible andinternationally aware students. We postulate that this move away from competition-basedmotivations and towards community service will be particularly appealing to non-traditionalengineering students such as minorities and women.This paper will examine the case study of EWB-Westlake High School, the first ever high schoolEWB chapter, which was chartered in the Fall of 2006, and conducted a work trip to Tanzania inJuly, 2007. The program assessment surveys address which specific activities were effective andwhich need future refinement, and explore the impact that an engineering service learningprogram can have on the future goals of the
thesix professional skills to the ABET engineering criteria, engineering education in the US today is“falling far short of preparing engineering graduates for practicing—and leading—in a change-driven, knowledge-intensive, global society that will characterize the decades ahead.”3In Restructuring Engineering Education: A Focus on Change, the NSF recommends thatengineering courses include early and continued exposure to environmental, political and socialissues and their international and historical contexts, as well as legal and ethical implications ofengineering solutions.4 Oberst and Jones argue that engineers shape and are shaped by “theemerging realities of a truly global workforce. Engineers as a professional group are thuscanaries in the
in-class discussions. The paperpresents a number of films that can be used for such analysis, indicating corresponding contentand other resources. Issues covered include creativity, entrepreneurship, organizational behavior,ethics, and others. The common ways of framing the film-based material to build relevant classexperience are also outlined.IntroductionWhen Edmund Phelps (Nobel 2006 in economics) recognized cinema as one of his learningtools, he probably was not expecting to inspire Italian management consultants to write a bookhow watching movies can help managers4. The story, after the book was published last year,made news in the Wall Street Journal15, indicating that perhaps watching feature films can be agood antidote for management
construction profession since construction isconstruction under constraint like drawing and specification2. Increasingly, both contractors andengineers must supplement technical mastery with business and communication skills, and anunderstanding of the ethical and societal impact of technical solutions. Traditional constructionengineering and management undergraduate programs, at over 130 credit hours for a BS degree,are not set up to handle an increased liberal education component or radically different modes ofcurriculum delivery such as team-based or affective domain modalities. The ABET EngineeringCriteria 2000 attempts to address this issue in the accreditation process.1In 1994 ABET held a workshop on accreditation criteria with financial support
plan for his/her program • Copies of the new college assessment forms • Handout of the power point presentation • Electronic copies of both old and new assessment formsThe power point presentation was brief and reviewed the college’s assessment plan and definedmany of the terms therein. Leadership and faculty roles were also clearly defined and timelineswere shared. Following the presentation, program directors began working to revise the oldassessment plans. The primary outcomes lacking in the old forms were several items from ABETcriterion 2. In particular, the ability to: • Function effectively on teams • Communicate effectively • Understand professional, ethical and social responsibilities2Although most program directors
in which it occurs13. In Figure 2, “mastery” is placed at the intersection of Page 13.1231.4cognitive and psychomotor development and “moral and ethical development” at theintersection of social and affective domains. When viewing the diagram, developmentallyadvancing in mastery or moral development would equate to moving along an axiscentered on the construct and coming out of the plane of the paper toward the viewer.The highest order of development for mastery would be self-directed learning orcognitive autonomy, akin to the construct that engineering educators call “life longlearning.” For moral and ethical development, a higher order of
. What engineers need to experience andknow, in addition to “hard” knowledge, is further explained by Shuman and Besterfield-Sacre as“process-oriented skills and awareness-oriented skills.”2 Process-oriented skills include“communication, teamwork, and the ability to recognize and resolve ethical dilemmas.”3 Theseskills are powerful when combined with awareness skills involving “understanding the impact ofglobal and social factors, knowledge of contemporary issues, and the ability to do lifelonglearning.”4 But what are the most effective ways of incorporating process and awareness-oriented practices into engineering curricula already crowded with necessary science, math, anddisciplinary courses? How can engineering schools, which must ensure that
valuableinsights into associated technical, ethical, and professional issues. Lessons learned from failureshave substantially affected civil engineering practice. The history of development of practice inmany engineering disciplines is, in large part, the story of failures and of the changes tostandards and procedures made as the result of forensic analyses. In addition to technical issues,concepts such as professional and ethical responsibility are highlighted by the cases. Somespecific examples are presented.Introduction The requirements that civil engineering programs have to meet now, and will have tomeet in the future, are contained in a number of documents. These include the general andprogram specific Accreditation Board for Engineering and
as well asemerging engineering fields suited to student interest. Likewise, it is essential to provide asocial, economic and ethical context to application of nanotechnology in manufacturing,medicine, and other contextual areas driving research and development. This provides a uniquechallenge and requires an approach which successfully integrates nanotechnology into currentacademic programs. Such an approach has the added benefit of enhancing student engagementand motivation. The result will be a better educated population of engineers, with anappreciation for the critical importance of nanoscale approaches to solving societal problems. b. Value of active/problem-based approachThere are many references regarding the value of problem
to compare the content of Capstone Design courses atdifferent colleges, or used by the instructor to develop and improve an existing course.Other Activities and Lectures:This listing is slightly different from the first one because some of these are student activities,while others are course lectures that are given to introduce the student to new topics or toreinforce and expand on topics. Other Activities: 1. Ethics 2. 3-D CAD Program: Pro-Engineer, Solidworks, or Catia 3. Teamwork Skills Lectures: 4. Resumes and Interviewing 5. Entrepreneurship 6. Patents and Licensing 7. Professionalism 8. Tolerances and Dimensions 9. Design for Safety 10
management, ethics, and professionalism. The authors havedeveloped a number of failure case studies for classroom use. Pilot studies have been carried outover several semesters in order to assess the use of failure case studies in civil engineering andengineering mechanics courses. Prior results were presented at the 2007 ASEE annual meeting,and that paper provides much of the background behind the work.1 First, case study topics are linked to specific ABET general and civil engineeringprogram criteria.2 3 Case study presentations and reading assignments have been developed tobuild student knowledge. Students are given specific homework and examination problems thatrequire application of the case studies. ABET criterion 3 defines 11 program
professionaland ethical responsibilities; (h) appreciating the impact of engineering solutions in a global andsocietal context; (i) engaging in life-long learning; and (j) understanding contemporary issues.These criteria, particularly 3h and 3j, were selected because of evidence from the Michigan Tech2006 graduating civil and environmental engineering student exit interviews that “ISD studentknowledge and recognition of these issues [Criteria 3h and 3j] far out-paced those of their peersin conventional senior design courses.” 9This paper only provides information on the first phase of the assessment program. Morerigorous assessment will begin in summer 2008. Survey data will be organized and analyzedusing SPSS, a statistical analysis and data management
. Course DevelopmentA Curriculum Context and Course ObjectivesIn our ECET curriculum, there are a few existing courses pertaining to the computer securitycourse. They are Computer Networks, Wireless Communications and Networks, Computersecurity discussion may be involved those courses, and we believe that it will be much better tointroduce the security topics systematically in this course. This will allow students be aware thatsecurity is an integral part of computer and network applications. Besides the technical solutionto secure computer systems, topics related to social engineering such as ethics and laws can bediscussed in-depth as well.As an integral part of computer engineering technology program, the primary goal of this coursewas to
, either as individual topics,components, or units that can be used as specific learning modules, into existing coursework.In fact, many approaches have been found to be quite successful for augmenting engineering andtechnology instruction by inserting additional materials into mainstream instruction38.Addressing engineering ethics is a prime example of how specific topics can be infused intocurricula without adding additional courses. Some avenues that have been shown to work wellinclude integrating focused components (theory as well as case study analyses) into specifictechnical courses39-43, examining issues during technical problem solving in specific technicalcourses44, issues and topics for review during capstone experiences45-46, specific