Conference Session

Student and Other Views on Engineering Leadership

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Meg Handley, Pennsylvania State University, University Park; Dena Lang, Pennsylvania State University, University Park; Andrew Michael Erdman, The Pennsylvania State University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Leadership Development Division

confidence without conceit. They have a firm handshake, look people inthe eye, address colleagues by name, take pride in their appearance, speak up instead ofmumbling, etc.”“I want the students to show full confidence to look me in the eye and tell me where theirinterests are, definitive answers are always best.” Leadership research reveals a positive relationship in a leader’s self-confidence andsuccessful leadership34. These findings also align with Hartman et. al.’s (2015) study whereindustry professionals identified initiative/confidence as a main competence for entry-levelengineering leaders. The authors define the initiative/confidence theme as “stepping up, goingthe extra step, asking questions, having confidence and/or self-confidence

Conference Session

ETAC/ABET-Related Issues

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sri R. Kolla, Bowling Green State University; David Border, Bowling Green State University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Technology

our students can seek and otherreasons. This paper presents the process adopted by the ECET program faculty to use the pastATMAE accreditation practices to present ABET accreditation. A hallmark of our program hasbeen the mandatory two-semester long co-op experiences and an optional third-semester co-opexperience, which has served as an important tool along with our in-class course instruction andlaboratory experience for the success of our students. Our program educational objectives reviewand student outcomes assessment of ABET’s Engineering Technology AccreditationCommission general ‘a to k’ criteria and Electrical/Electronic(s) Engineering Technology, andComputer Engineering Technology program specific criteria use four direct and

Conference Session

Teaching & Learning Dynamics, Vibration, and Mechanics More Broadly

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Blake Everett Johnson, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Jason W Morphew, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Tagged Divisions

Mechanics

corresponds to an air velocity of roughly 30 m/s. With the leaky connections, theerrant dynamic pressure and velocity measured about 6 mm of water and 10 m/s, respectively.Thus, their digital measurement device appeared in every way to be working properly, but if thestudents took the effort to convert their pressure measurement to a velocity measurement, theymay realize that the velocity they were measuring was too low, which admittedly may requiresome amount of intuition that the students probably do not yet have.Because the exercise involves questions of accuracy, the students were also asked to assess theuncertainty in their measurements. Because the fluid density is needed to convert the dynamicpressure measurement into a velocity measurement

Conference Session

Engineering Cultures and Identity

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Alexis Prybutok, The University of Texas, Austin; Anita D. Patrick, University of Texas, Austin; Maura J. Borrego, University of Texas, Austin; Carolyn Conner Seepersad, University of Texas, Austin; Mary Jo Kirisits, University of Texas, Austin

Tagged Topics

ASEE Diversity Committee, Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

an Analytic Lens. Journal of Research in Science and Teaching 2007, 44, 1187-1218. 2. Meyers, K. L.; Ohland, M. W.; Pawley, A. L.; Silliman, S. E.; & Smith, K. A. Factors relating to engineering identity. Global Journal of Engineering Education 2012, 14 (1), 119-131. 3. Ohland, M. W.; Sheppard, S. D.; Lichtenstein, G.; Eris, O.; Chachra, D.; & Layton, R. A. Persistence, Engagement, and Migration in Engineering Programs. Journal of Engineering Education 2008, 97 (3), 259- 278. 4. Meyer, M.; Marx, S. Engineering Dropouts: A Qualitative Examination of Why Undergraduates Leave Engineering. Journal of Engineering Education 2014, 103 (4), 525-548. 5. Godwin, A.; Potvin, G.; & Hazari, Z. The Development

Conference Session

Proven Strategies in Classroom Engagement Part II: Activities for Creative Pedagogy

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Celio Biering P.E., Department of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, United States Military Academy; Joseph P Hanus, U.S. Military Academy; Rahul Verma P.E., United States Military Academy

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering

civilengineering faculty have sought to develop their program appropriately along a set of commonlyaccepted educational taxonomies; that is, Bloom’s Taxonomy. These widely known taxonomiesare based on the seminal work of the 1950’s educational committee chaired by Benjamin Bloom.The committee established a set of taxonomies in three domains of learning: cognitive, affectiveand psychomotor. The cognitive domain taxonomy is widely accepted in many fields and hasbeen identified as, “arguably one of the most influential education monographs of the past halfcentury.”3 The taxonomies are a language that describes the progressive development of anindividual in each domain and are defined as follows4:  Cognitive: of, relating to, being, or involving conscious

Conference Session

Graduate Programs, Development, and Research Fellowships

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Laleh Behjat P.Eng., University of Calgary; Milana Trifkovic, University of Calgary; Robyn Paul, University of Calgary; Karen Andrea Canon-Rubio, University of Calgary; Stephanie Hladik, University of Calgary

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Graduate Studies

styles, and academic integrity.To build an effective supervisory relationship, first a workshop on Life as a graduate student isoffered. Students hear from senior graduate students on the challenges, opportunities, andsupport throughout grad studies. Additional topics of discussion include: 1) how to keep a happyand healthy life style, 2) where to get help? and 3) what are the opportunities for leadership orscholarship? The discussions are conducted in round table groups to provide an open format.The second workshop focuses on the supervisory relationship. This workshop is designed toteach students on their responsibilities as graduate students, and to give them a toolkit to build asuccessful relationship with their supervisor(s)/academic

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session I

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Milo Koretsky, Oregon State University; Jana Bouwma-Gearhart, Oregon State University; Shane A. Brown P.E., Oregon State University; Thomas Dick, Oregon State University; Susie J Brubaker-Cole, Oregon State University; Ann Sitomer, Oregon State University; Kathleen Quardokus Fisher, Oregon State University; Christina Smith, Oregon State University; John David Ivanovitch, Oregon State university; Julie Risien, Center for Research on Lifelong STEM Learning; Lori J. Kayes, Department of Integrative Biology, Oregon State University; Devon Quick, Oregon State University

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

DUE1347817. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this materialare those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation.References1. Koretsky, M., Bouwma-Gearhart, J., Brown, S. A., Dick, T., Brubaker-Cole, S. J., Sitomer, A., Quardokus Fisher, K., Risien, J., Little, D. L., Smith, C., & Ivanovitch, J. D. (2015, June). Enhancing STEM Education at Oregon State University – Year 1 Paper presented at 2015 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Seattle, Washington. 10.18260/p.240022. Henderson, C., Beach, A., & Finkelstein, N. (2011). Facilitating change in undergraduate STEM instructional practices: An analytic review of the literature. Journal of

Conference Session

College-Industry Partnerships Division Technical Session I: Students

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Glenda D Young, Virginia Tech; David B Knight, Virginia Tech Department of Engineering Education; Lee Michael Warburton, AKKA Technologies; Christopher David Ciechon

Tagged Divisions

College Industry Partnerships

major in college. Findings identifieddifferences in male and female students career fit confidence offering another reason whywomen were more likely to leave engineering after graduation [25]. Cech et al.’s findingssuggest it is important to consider the impact of professional socialization when examininginteractions engineering students have with industry. The authors illustrate how the frameworkcan be used to explain gender representation differences in engineering.Our intent for this paper is to use professional socialization as a lens to examine the value that anAIDP brings to a students’ engineering identity formation, not to provide a full review on thistopic. We focus on three outcomes of professional socialization to guide our

Conference Session

Thermodynamics, Fluids, and Heat Transfer I

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Arden Moore, Louisiana Tech University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

Paper ID #15214Experiential Learning in the Thermal Sciences: Introducing and ReinforcingFundamental Thermodynamics and Heat Transfer Principles to K-12 andEngineering Undergraduate StudentsDr. Arden Moore, Louisiana Tech University Dr. Moore graduated with his B. S. in mechanical engineering from Louisiana Tech University in 2001, followed by his Master’s and Ph. D. degrees in mechanical engineering from the University of Texas at Austin in 2007 and 2010, respectively. During his time in graduate school he worked in the fields of thermoelectric nanostructures, nanoscale energy transport physics, and advanced thermal

Conference Session

Teaching Methods in Mechancial Engineering

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kimberly Bernadine Catton, Colorado State University; Abril Galang, Colorado State University; Alexander T Bulk, Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, Colorado State University

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

downside to active learning using clickers in large classes.Institutions may need to reconsider large class sizes with clickers to take advantage ofimprovements in exam performance and benefits in terms of cognitive and non-cognitiveoutcomes.References [1] President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (2012) Fact Sheet: Engage to Excel: Producing one million additional college graduates with degrees in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics.[2] U.S. Department of Education: National Center of Education Statistics (2013) Digest of Education Statistics[3] Freeman, S., S.L. Eddy, M. McDonough, M.K. Smith, N. Okoroafor, H. Jordt, M.P. Wenderoth (2014) Active learning increases student performance in science

Conference Session

Trends in Accreditation and Assessment

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Atsushi Akera, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

—a specific critique offered by the ABET Engineering AccreditationCommission’s (EAC’s) Criterion 3 Task Force (TF-3). The obdurate habit of over-specification cansimply manifest itself in different ways—although we ought to consider in the same light TF-3’s ownrecommendation to include within Criterion 3 only those outcomes that can be reliably achieved.11As already alluded to above, what stymies effective solutions in engineering education is hardly limited tothe disciplinary habits and boundaries of engineering; the reasons go back to the structure of U.S.educational institutions and the engineering profession itself. With regards to the latter, engineers shouldstop worrying that theirs is somehow an incomplete profession. Sociologists

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 4

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Michael J. Dyrenfurth, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

ideation? Why can person A in agiven situation generate a potential innovation while person B, perhaps even with a substantiallysimilar background, cannot? Consideration of the concepts/principles presented in Figure 4provides engineering and technology education researchers a framework for raising questionsthat might lead to fruitful investigations. The ten speculations listed below are initial examples ofsuch research questions. Perhaps the innovator(’s):1. knowledge representation is more holistic, i.e., established as a system as contrasted to hundreds/thousands of discrete individual facts/ideas?2. has a better memory and a larger/wider store of information to work with , or perhaps the innovator just has a better/quicker way of

Conference Session

The Philosophy of Engineering and Technological Literacy

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jennifer Karlin, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology; Cheryl Allendoerfer, University of Washington; Rebecca A Bates, Minnesota State University, Mankato; Dan Ewert, North Dakota State University; Ronald R Ulseth P.E., Itasca Community College

Tagged Divisions

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering

National Academies, Washington, DC. 2. Borrego, M., Froyd, J. E., & Hall, T. S. (2010). Diffusion of engineering education innovations: A survey of awareness and adoption rates in US engineering departments. Journal of Engineering Education, 99(3), 185-207. 3. Prince, M., Borrego, M., Henderson, C., Cutler, S., & Froyd, J. (2013). Use of research- based instructional strategies in core chemical engineering courses. Chemical Engineering Education, 47(1), 27-37. 4. Froyd, J. E., Wankat, P. C., & Smith, K. A. (2012). Five major shifts in 100 years of engineering education. Proceedings of the IEEE, 100(Special Centennial Issue), 1344- 1360. 5. Jesiek, B. K., Borrego, M., and Beddoes, K. (2010

Conference Session

Professional Skills development in Design

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Oenardi Lawanto, Utah State University; Matthew Cromwell, Utah State University - Engineering Education; Andreas Febrian, Utah State University - Engineering Education

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

develop andrecognize one’s own self-regulation in learning and teaching.ACKNOWLEDGMENT This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation underGrant No. 1148806. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed inthis material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation.Bibliography[1] ABET - Engineering Accreditation Commission, “Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs: Effective for Reviews During the 2015-2016 Accreditation Cycle. November, 2014[2] Zimmerman, B. J., “Becoming a Self-Regulated Learner: An Overview.” Theory into Practice, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 64-70, 2002.[3] Zimmerman, B. J. Attaining self

Conference Session

Engineering Economy Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Corey Kiassat, PhD, MBA, PE P.E., Quinnipiac University; Xiaoyue Jiang, Quinnipiac University

Tagged Topics

ASEE Diversity Committee

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Economy

theindividual students’ roles. CATME is a short, web-based survey that collects and analyzes self-and peer-evaluation feedback. A behaviorally-anchored rating scale is utilized to assesscontributions of each team member in five areas based on the team effectiveness literature (Ohlandet al., (2012)23. The grade for each team-based component is multiplied by the CATME factor foreach student and that is the score entered for the student. As such, if a student does not pull his/herweight, s/he is penalized by the rest of the team and gets a lower grade than the rest of the teammembers. Conversely, if a student goes above and beyond the norm, s/he is recognized by theteammates and gets a higher grade than the original team score.It should be noted that

Conference Session

Student Recruitment and Retention in ET Programs and Labs in ET Programs

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Matthew Turner, Purdue University (Statewide Technology); Rustin Webster, Purdue University, New Albany; Danielle Reynolds; Timothy Cooley, Purdue University New Albany; Andrew McCart , Purdue Polytechnic; Joseph F Dues Jr., Purdue Polytechnic New Albany

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Technology

to navigate asimulated Mars surface. Assessment results indicate that by engaging students in project and team basedlearning in the context of real world applications, interest in STEM majors can be increased in highschool students.References [1]. Jeffers, A., Safferman, A., and Safferman, S. (2004). Understanding K–12 Engineering Outreach Programs. J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract. 30:2(95), 95-108.[2]. Anderson-Rowland, M.R. (1996). A first year engineering student survey to assist recruitment and retention," Frontiers in Education Conference, 1996. FIE '96. 26th Annual Conference., Proceedings of, Salt Lake City, UT, pp. 372-376 vol.1.[3]. Cantrell, P. and Ewing-Taylor, J. (2009), Exploring STEM career options through

Conference Session

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering Division: Robotics in Pre-K-12 Engineering Education

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Olivia Mambo Nche, Clemson University; Barbara Jeanne Ramirez, Clemson University; Sekou Remy, Clemson University

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education Division

’ motivation in elementary education. Learning Technologies, IEEE Transactions on, 7(4), 333-345.[3] Curto, B., & Moreno, V. (2013). A robot in the classroom. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Technological Ecosystem for Enhancing Multiculturality (pp. 295-296). ACM.[4] De Cristoforis, P., Pedre, S., Nitsche, M., Fischer, T., Pessacg, F., & Di Pietro, C. (2013). A Behavior- based approach for educational robotics activities. Education, IEEE Transactions on, 56(1), 61-66.[5] Ganesh, T. G. (2011). Design-based research: A framework for designing novel teaching and learning experiences in middle school engineering education. In IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), (pp. T2F-1).[6] Schweingruber, H. A

Conference Session

Statics and Dynamics in Mechanical Engineering

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Alan Bowling, University of Texas, Arlington; Ashley Guy; Frasier Jones, University of Texas, Arlington; Maria Adamuti-Trache, University of Texas, Arlington

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

the faculty member(s) promptand guide smaller student groups in learning and applying just taught concepts while theycomplete a problem in class. The goal is to attain the benefits of group work while providingjust in time coaching to address any conceptual issues as they occur. Although group orteam-based learning has its advantages, it still has well-known disadvantages. The maindrawback being the student who is not participating may have less effective learning expe-riences as compared to the more gregarious and/or confident students who actually solvethe problem. The purpose of this paper is to discuss this technique in the context of teach-ing undergraduate dynamics, although we believe it can be applied in other undergraduatescience

Conference Session

Software Applications in ET Programs

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Omer Farook, Purdue University Calumet (College of Technology); Jai P Agrawal, Purdue University, Calumet (College of Technology); Ashfaq Ahmed, Purdue University Calumet (College of Technology); Athula Kulatunga, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Naveen Kumar Koyi, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Hassan Abdullah Alibrahim, Purdue University Calumet; Mohammad Almenaies, Purdue University, Calumet

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Technology

, magnetometer and gyroscope and putting them on a single die with ahigh speed ARM Cortex-M0 based processor) with BeagleBone Black (BBB) to collect 3Dorientation rotational data. BN0055 communicates with BBB via I2C bus. The BBB based subjectdesigned system further communicates with a remote server Python module (hosted by Adafruit)in controlling a 3D model on a webpage.The BNO055 can output the following sensor data1:  Absolute Orientation (Euler Vector, 100Hz) Three axis orientation data based on a 360° sphere  Absolute Orientation (Quaterion, 100Hz) Four point quaternion output for more accurate data manipulation  Angular Velocity Vector (100Hz) Three axis of 'rotation speed' in rad/s  Acceleration Vector

Conference Session

Fostering Transformational Change in Civil Engineering

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

T. Michael Toole P.E., Bucknell University

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering

sustainability.Routledge/Taylor & Francis, New York.[11] Driscoll, T. R., J. E. Harrison, et al. (2008). “The role of design issues in work-related fatal injury in Australia.”J. of Safety Research 39(2): 209-214.[12] Gambatese, J. (2000). “Safety in a designer’s hands.” Civil Engineering. June. P. 56-59.[13] Gambatese, J. (2003). “Safety emphasis in university engineering and construction programs.” International e-Journal of Construction. ISBN 1-886431-09-4. May 14, 2003.[14] Gambatese, J. A., Behm, M., and Hinze, J. (2005). “Viability of designing for construction worker safety.” J.Constr. Eng. Manage., 131(9), 1029–1036.[15] Gambatese, J., Behm, M., and Rajendran, S. (2009). “Designer’s role in construction accident causality andprevention: Perspectives

Conference Session

Developing Systems Engineering Curriculum and Programs

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Polinpapilinho Katina, Old Dominion University; Joseph M Bradley, Leading Change, LLC

Tagged Divisions

Systems Engineering

RAND, 1948-1967 (No. RAND/N-2936-RC) (p. 4).Santa Monica, CA: RAND.20 Gibson, J. E., Scherer, W. T., & Gibson, W. F. (2007). How to do systems analysis. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Interscience.21 INCOSE. (2011). Systems engineering handbook: A guide for system life cycle processes and activities. (H.Cecilia, Ed.) (3.2 ed.). San Diego, CA: INCOSE.22 Blanchard, B. S., & Fabrycky, W. J. (2006). Systems engineering and analysis (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ:Pearson - Prentice Hall.23 Churchman, C. W., Ackoff, R. L., & Arnoff, E. (1957). Introduction to operations research. New York, NY:Wiley.24 Forrester, J. W. (1961). Industrial dynamics. Cambridge, MA: MIT press Cambridge, MA.25 Sterman, J. D. (2000). Business dynamics: Systems

Conference Session

Make It!

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Saneela Rabbani, Vaughn College of Aeronautics and Technology; Josiah David D'Arrigo, Vaughn College of Aeronautics and Technology; Shouling He, Vaughn College of Aeronautics and Technology; Amir Elzawawy , Vaughn College of Aeronautics and Technology; Hossein Rahemi, Vaughn College of Aeronautics and Technology

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing

& Technology. He is the author of two books, Vaughn College Journal of Engineering and Technology (VCJET), numerous conference papers in the areas of solid mechanics, computational mechanics, vibration analysis, fracture mechanics and reliability analysis. He is also a principle investi- gator for the NSF S-STEM grant and the HIS-STEM grant and a student adviser for a number of technical papers in the areas of mechanics, robotics and industrial automation. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 MAKER: An Innovated Braille ClockAbstractTelling time is a fairly simple task for sighted people. However, it poses considerable constraintson the blind and

Conference Session

Circuits & Systems Education II

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Karen L. Butler-Purry, Texas A&M University; Mehmet Oren, Texas A&M University; Susan Pedersen, Texas A&M University; Justin Foreman, Prairie View A&M University; Pamela Obiomon, Prairie View A&M University; Ajay K. Katangur, Texas A&M University - Corpus Christi

Tagged Divisions

Electrical and Computer

between operations performed using these tools and equivalent Boolean algebraic manipulations.4 3 The SS Aprille 14 81 (spring Adders - 2's Using combinational Erickson (spring 2015) comp. circuitry, be able to analyze 2015) Subtractors - 2's and design standard 53 (fall comp arithmetic

Conference Session

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering Division: Fundamental; K-12 Students & Engineering Division: Fundamental; K-12 Students & Engineering Design Practices: Best Paper Session

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Morgan M. Hynes, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Tamara J. Moore, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Monica E. Cardella, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Kristina Maruyama Tank, Iowa State University; Senay Purzer, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Muhsin Menekse, Purdue University; Sean P. Brophy, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education Division

curriculum—and what this looks like as enactedby K-2 students. As the previous computational thinking definition highlights, the problemsolving strategies and skills used in computational thinking will likely share many things incommon with the STEM disciplines. Thus, even though the prior implementations PictureSTEMfocused on STEM and literacy thinking and learning, there is likely to be aspects ofcomputational thinking also present. This paper provides examples of aspects of computationalthinking (i.e., troubleshooting) that are present without a claim that these are ideal or completeintegrations of computational thinking.MethodsDescription of PictureSTEM unit(s)The PictureSTEM curriculum was developed for grades K-2, with emphasis on the use

Conference Session

Assessment I: Developing Assessment Tools

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Gayle Lesmond, University of Toronto; Nikita Dawe, University of Toronto; Lisa Romkey, University of Toronto; Susan McCahan, University of Toronto

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

. Describe future research directions 7A. Outline ‘next steps’ or future work 7B. Suggest methodological improvements 8. Engage in learning 8A. Appropriately connect/use course concepts in the investigation process 8B. Identify/reflect on “lessons learned” 8C. Manage time and resources effectively to complete the investigationIn problem analysis, the student displays the ability to: 1. Define the problem 1A. State the problem in their own words 1B. Identify primary problem goal(s) 1C. Characterize the type of problem and the type of solution sought 1D. Represent the problem visually (e.g., free body diagram, circuit schematic) 1E. Identify known information 1F. Recognize

Conference Session

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering Division: Fundamental; K-12 Students & Engineering Division: Fundamental; K-12 Students & Engineering Design Practices: Best Paper Session

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

David Crismond, City College of the City University of New York; Michal Lomask

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education Division

.  The  rubrics  can  also  be  used  for  self-­‐assessment  as  well  as  for  professional  development  purposes.  These  rubrics  are  not  content-­‐specific,  therefore  they  can  be  used  with  a  wide  range  of  engineering  design-­‐based  K-­‐12  STEM  curricula.  Providing  teachers  with  Teaching  Standards  and  performance  rubrics  can  guide  and  improve  instruction  in  technology  education  settings.         7  References  Ball,  D.  L.,  Lubienski,  S.,  &  Mewborn,  D.    (2001).    Research  on  teaching  mathematics:  The  unsolved  problem  of  teachers’  mathematical  knowledge.    In  V

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session I

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Charles E. Pierce, University of South Carolina; Nicole Berge, University of South Carolina; Joseph V. Flora, University of South Carolina; Fabio Matta, University of South Carolina; Robert Petrulis, EPRE Consulting LLC; Ethan Washam, STV Engineers

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

, however.At this time, the students were not certain that their ideas had changed about graduate school.However, all agreed that they had developed new understanding about the ways that research isdone, and how it might influence the practice of engineering.4. Step Two - Summer Research ExperienceStudents were immersed in a 12-week research-intensive summer experience. The students wereprovided workspace within our departmental senior design room, which contains five partitionedworkstations and a large conference table. The bulk of student time was dedicated to pursuinghis/her research proposal, as each student worked on his/her project with their researchadvisor(s). In addition, there were a number of small group activities conducted throughout

Conference Session

Teaching & Learning Statics and Mechanics of Materials

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sarah Baxter, University of St. Thomas; Bethany Fralick, University of South Carolina, Aiken

Tagged Divisions

Mechanics

Higher EducationReport No. 1. Washington D.C.: The George Washington University School of Education and Human Development, 1991.[2] Felder, R. and Brent, R. “Cooperative Learning in Technical Courses: Procedures, Pitfalls and Payoffs” ERIC DocumentReproduction Service, ED 377038, 1994.[3] Felder, R. and Brent, R. “Learning by Doing” Chem. Engr. Education 37(4), 282-283, 2003.[4] Prince, M. “Does Active Learning Work? A Review of the Research” J. Engr. Education, 93(3) 223-231, 2004[5] Freeman, S., Eddy, S.L., McDonough, M., Smith, M.K., Okoroafor, N. Jordt, H and Wenderroth, M.P. “Active learningincreases student performance in science, engineering and mathematics” PNAS, 111(23), 8410-8415, 2014.[6] Culmann. Karl, "Die graphisehe Statik" Zürich

Conference Session

Technology-Related Educational Research

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ting-Ting Wu, Graduate School of Technological and Vocational Education, National Yunlin University of Science and Technology; Yueh-Min (Ray) Huang, Cheng-Kung University; Rustam Shadiev, Department of Engineering Science, National Cheng Kung University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Computers in Education

according to theteaching procedure. The system interface is shown in Figure 2. The basic functions in mostlearning platforms were also included in the system, such as: schedule reminder, discussionforums (asynchronous), video conferencing (synchronous), assignment submission, feedbackevaluation and so on. Particularly, the project based learning which consists of five stageswas implemented in the learning system: Preparation (P) - Implementation (I) - Presentation(P) - Evaluation (E) - Revision (R), and SCAMPER teaching strategy which includes seventhinking-based dimensions: Substitute (S), Combine (C), Adapt (A), Modify (M), Put to otheruses (P), Eliminate (E) and Rearrange (R). At each stage, students were able to use theactivity module provided

Collection

2016 Spring ASEE Middle Atlantic Section Conference

Authors

Vazgen Shekoyan; Sunil Dehipawala; Kimberly Riegel; George Tremberger; David Lieberman; Tak Cheung

of affective learning is an obviousconclusion, rather than the lack of psychomotor learning. When an engineering student gave amathematical explanation on the question of “Explain the non-zero intercept of the shown labgraph” in a lecture-test, he/she was not using critical thinking. For example, in the 9.8 m/s/sverification lab using an object sliding down a tilted air-track, a graph containing acceleration onthe y-axis and sine of the titled angle on the x-axis is expected to have a zero intercept. Astatement like “The explanation of having an uneven table shows critical thinking skill when atechnician presents such data to an engineer” usually would be sufficient to re-activate theaffective learning in an engineering student, not that we