mainly focused on the reform strategies of engineering① The Engineers’ Council for Professional Development (ECPD) was founded in 1932 as an engineeringprofessional body dedicated to the education, accreditation, regulation and professional development ofengineering professionals and students in the United States. In 1980, ECPD was renamed the AccreditationBoard for Engineering and Technology (ABET) to more accurately describe its emphasis on accreditation.http://www.abet.org/about-abet/history/teaching and curriculum from the perspective of curriculum design, students appraisal andclassroom teaching evaluation under ABET accreditation, and impact of ABET upon thedevelopment of engineering disciplines and programs. A few monographs were also
involved with district-wide initiatives including technology integration, Just In Time Assessments, curriculum pacing guides, and implementation of a research based, hands-on science and engineering curriculum. Mia has also worked closely with FOSS as a professional development facilitator. She also worked with Project WET at the University of Arizona Maricopa County Cooperative Extension as a curriculum developer and professional development faciltator. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Investigating Peer Observers' Perspectives on Middle School Engineering Designers' Communication Challenges (Work in Progress) Author 1, Institution
MarylandEastern Shore, received funding for an National Science foundation (NSF) grant entitled,“Experiment Centric Based Engineering Curriculum for HBCUs”. The project advances aprocess which will create a sustainable “HBCU Engineering Network” that is focused on thedevelopment, implementation, and expansion of an Experiment centric-based instructionalpedagogy in engineering curricula used in these HBCUs. ASEE HBCU Content Paper 2The goal of the project is to increase the number of highly qualified and prepared AfricanAmerican engineers, and all students, to have a better understanding of technology and its role inSTEM education and the policy associated with it. Another key goal
“contextually based; that is, students must understand contextual nuances and makereferences and analyses accordingly”(p.10)33. They also encourage students to challenge theirown assumptions and to be open to the wide variety of perspectives and solutions that may be presented by their fellow classmates33. In engineering classrooms, case studies can help developstudents’ critical thinking skills by requiring students to integrate technical, ethical, and societalknowledge to address the problems presented in the case study36.Case studies as Cultural ProbesThe Articulating a Succinct Description method draws upon Cultural Probes, an idea firstemployed by Gaver and his colleagues as an experimental approach to design research thatcaptures insight into
treating the end user as a person versus just the end user. I: Okay. R: More than a technical spec. Like more like an actual person.Brittany’s multiplistic understanding of ethics is situated in her focus on the user. That is,focusing on the user forced inclusion of multiple possibilities for the “right” way to proceed indesign. This finding suggests the possible relationship between a human-centered focus andhigher order orientations in ethical development. Furthermore, the context of the service-learningcourse possibly shaped this integrated view of ethics and HCD. The course, in her estimation,provided a view of the user that shifted
illustration issues in visualization, and learning analytics. As CWIT Director, she oversees three scholars programs for undergraduates committed to increasing gender diversity in the technology fields and develops programs to increase the interest and retention of women in technology. Together, these programs have a persistence and graduation rate of over 90% in technol- ogy majors. She has garnered over $1,800,000 from government and industry sources to support CWIT initiatives in curriculum development, student support, and computing/engineering education research. In 2012, Dr. Rheingans was awarded the University System Maryland (USM) Regents Mentoring Award.Dr. Lee Blaney, UMBC Dr. Lee Blaney is an Assistant Professor
-native speakers ofEnglish.10,11Students’ consistent performance increase is generally attributed to a cluster of interrelatedpractical and cognitive factors. Foremost, given the limited time that an instructor has availablefor formative review of student writing (particularly in writing-across-the-curriculum designs),peer review effectively increases a student’s opportunities to receive timely feedback to informrevisions.2,6 Reviews across a breadth of research suggest that in higher education settings, theeffect of peer feedback upon a student’s work is equivalent to the feedback of the instructor.1Substantive revision is a key practice of experts that we must often scaffold in students, and peerreview serves as an organizing circumstance for
, NASA, DoEd, KSEF and LMC. He is currently serving as an editor of Journal of Computer Standards & Interfaces.Dr. Aditya Akundi, University of Texas, El Paso Aditya Akundi is currently affiliated to Industrial Manufacturing and Systems Engineering department, and Research Institute for Manufacturing and Engineering Systems at University of Texas, ElPaso. He earned a Bachelor of Technology in Electronics and Communication Engineering from Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University, India. He earned a Master of Science in Electrical and Computer En- gineering at the University of Texas at El Paso (UTEP). Intrigued by Systems Engineering , he earned a Ph.D in Electrical and Computer Engineering, with a concentration
theireducation and that asking good questions and seeking help when they needed it is takingleadership along with coming to office hours, starting assignments early, and following throughon their delegated responsibilities by being an active participant in class activities. Other thansome initial discussion, there were mentions of leadership throughout the semester when theprofessor felt that students were not following through on their responsibilities and when somegroups were not keeping up with their assigned tasks and deadlines.Development of Leadership Through Hands-On Laboratory Exercises in Self-Selected TeamsIn many academic programs, leadership is not directly included in the curriculum. Students areoften encouraged to pursue internships and
) Integrating Matlab Graphical User Interface in Statics Course, In 2006 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, p 1, Chicago, IL.10. Narayanan, G. (2005) Inclusion of Hands-on Interactive Programs for Teaching Statics, In 2005 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Portland, OR.11. Steif, P. S., and Dollar, A. (2005) Reinventing the Teaching of Statics, International Journal of Engineering Education 21, 723.12. Wang, S.-L. (2003) MATLAB courseware for machine design, In 2003 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Nashville, TN.13. Depcik, C., and Assanis, D. N. (2005) Graphical user interfaces in an engineering educational environment, Computer Applications in Engineering Education 13, 48-59.14. Lent, C. S., Brockman
engaged in education research. Brian has also facilitated over 300 education devel- opment workshops on problem-based learning, assessment, curriculum development and peer instruction across 10 countries. His education research interests include examining students’ approaches to learn- ing within group-based project-driven pedagogies, epistemological development, progression, conceptual understanding and pedagogical evaluations. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Performance by gender on university placement tests in mathematics and spatial skillsIntroductionIn an effort to enhance the first year experience (FYE) it is now common for higher
Paper ID #18975Learning Experience in Designing a Dome Test Setup for Sheet Metal Forma-bility CharacterizationMonica Dore Monica Dor´e currently holds an engineering position at the National Aeronautics and Space Adminis- tration (NASA) at Wallops Flight Facility as an Aerospace engineer. Ms. Dore has received an Un- dergraduate Degree with Honors in Engineering with a Mechanical Specialization from the University of Maryland Eastern Shore (UMES) in December 2014. Prior to receiving her undergraduate degree she worked as an intern with NASA from 2012-2014. She works supporting Airborne Science missions aboard flight
Paper ID #19614Clinical Immersion Program for Bioengineering and Medical StudentsProf. Susan Stirling, UIC School of Design, University of Illinois at Chicago Susan Stirling is a a designer, researcher and educator. She has an undergraduate degree from the Univer- sity of Wisconsin-Madison and a graduate degree from the Institute of Design at the Illinois Institute of Technology. At the University of Illinois at Chicago she teaches Design Research Methods, Human Experience in Design and Interdisciplinary Product Development. Susan collaborates with non-design faculty to teach the design process, and helps
overwhelming for students.Sources of student confusion regarding units are manifold. The variety of emphasis placed onunits conversions and cancellations across the curriculum can lead students to believe that unitsdifficulties are subject-specific, leading to a “units anxiety” that occurs fresh with every class.The emphasis can range from a consistent methodical treatment of units in class examples to atotal absence of numerical computations. (The author took an undergraduate heat transfer classin which students needed to rely on classroom lectures because there was no assigned text. Theinstructor presented all material by deriving governing relationships in a purely symbolicfashion. Not a single example, homework problem, or exam problem contained a
Paper ID #20589Effect of Demographics on the Spatial Visualization Skills in 2D and 3D CourseOfferingsDr. Jorge Rodriguez P.E., Western Michigan University Faculty member in the Department of Engineering Design, Manufacturing, and Management Systems (EDMMS) at Western Michigan University’s (WMU). Co-Director of the Center for Integrated Design (CID), and currently the college representative to the President’s University-wide Sustainability Com- mittee at WMU. Received his Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering-Design from University of Wisconsin- Madison and received an MBA from Rutgers University. His B.S. degree was in Mechanical
undergoing their three-year evaluation by an external Committee ofVisitors. This process is intended to assess the quality and integrity of the program operations andmanagement, and the division’s contribution towards NSF’s mission and strategic goals. I quicklybecame fascinated by the challenges in how to assess the Broader Impact Merit Review Criteriaafter speaking with several Program Officers and reading the 2013 report from the EEC COV. TheEEC COV report echoed some of the concerns Program Officers were hearing from the PIcommunity around the Broader Impact criterion. Thus, with the support of my summer mentors, Idecided to conduct an exploratory study to gain insight into how the PI community was addressingand proposing to assess Broader
Paper ID #18926Survey Development to Measure the Gap Between Student Awareness, Liter-acy, and Action to Address Human-caused Climate ChangeDr. Tripp Shealy, Virginia Tech Tripp Shealy is an assistant professor in the Charles E. Via, Jr. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering and principal faculty member in the Myers-Lawson School of Construction at Virginia Tech. He received his doctorate from Clemson University. His research is broadly focuses on judgment and decision making for sustainable infrastructure. This includes education for sustainability, specifically, how student understanding and attitude towards
Paper ID #18920Validating Content of a Sustainable Design Rubric Using Established Frame-worksCharles Cowan, James Madison UniversityDr. Elise Barrella, James Madison University Dr. Elise Barrella is an Assistant Professor of Engineering at James Madison University, who focuses teaching, scholarship, service, and student mentoring on transportation systems, sustainability, and engi- neering design. Dr. Barrella completed her Ph.D. in Civil Engineering at Georgia Tech where she con- ducted research in transportation and sustainability as part of the Infrastructure Research Group (IRG). Dr. Barrella has investigated best
students’understanding of each discipline22. Thus, the design and implementation of the curriculum usedin this study is supported by the STEM integration framework.Theoretical frameworksThis research was guided by two theoretical frameworks: Toulmin’s Argument Pattern (TAP)and The Framework for Quality K-12 Engineering Education. Our research question requiresthat we understand when an instance of EBR is occurring within the solution generation phasesof the students’ design processes. Therefore, we have selected these two theoretical frameworksto define EBR and the stages of the engineering design process in which students engage in orderto answer our research question.TAP23 is a classic theory of how arguments develop and the elements of an argument. The
helping students to learn ROS efficiently and meaningfully in the real world of engineeringprojects. Preliminary assessment of this multi-lab-driven learning method for providing roboticseducation supports its effectiveness.1. IntroductionWith the continued advances in autonomous robotics over the several decades, it is becomingincreasingly vital that the development of a new curriculum on Robot Operating System (ROS)in a university be well aligned to technology advancements and applications [1,2,15]. The ROShas drawn attention from the field of robotics over the last several years [15]. The primaryobjective of ROS is to provide an open source, configurable, and unified programmingframework utilized for controlling robots in a variety of
which engineering literacy coursescan be integrated into the undergraduate curriculum. The broad nature of engineering facilitatesalignment of engineering literacy courses with institutional opportunities. At Union Collegeengineering faculty teach engineering literacy courses as offerings in the required second-year-seminar at Union [15]. The objectives of this college-wide seminar series include an opportunityto do independent research in a focused topical area. Examples of courses include PervasiveComputing and Nanotechnology. Some engineering programs have been successful inestablishing courses that meet university general education requirements. Norton and Bahr [16]offer a course called Materials: Foundations of Society at Washington State
/subspecialties including MedicalInstrumentation, Imaging, Biomechanics and Human Factors, and Biomaterials/Cellular/TissueEngineering. With a thorough introduction to various technical and professional skills as well aseach subspecialty, it was hypothesized that there will be an improvement in student performancelater in the curriculum and that students can make informed decision while selecting appropriatetrack and career path. We have compiled data from our department’s Assessment Committeewho evaluate student outcome performance throughout the curriculum (sophomore throughsenior year) from student populations with the new BME 201 (post-201) and students in theprevious client-based sophomore course (pre-201). We have also assessed the
the vice president of Purdue Billiards Club since 2015.Mr. Zhuofan LiMr. Yudi WuDr. Carla B. Zoltowski, Purdue University Carla B. Zoltowski is an assistant professor of engineering practice in the Schools of Electrical and Com- puter Engineering and (by courtesy) Engineering Education at Purdue University. She holds a B.S.E.E., M.S.E.E., and Ph.D. in Engineering Education, all from Purdue. Prior to this she was Co-Director of the EPICS Program at Purdue where she was responsible for developing curriculum and assessment tools and overseeing the research efforts within EPICS. Her academic and research interests include the profes- sional formation of engineers, diversity and inclusion in engineering, human-centered
how teacher motivation translates into student self-efficacy, informingthe design of pre-college curriculum and teacher training.(4) Learning and achievement of science, technology, and mathematics content and practicesWe coded 44 papers as having goals related to learning and achievement of science, technology,and mathematics content and practices. Of these, 18 (41%) provided outcomes that wereinterpretable. We identified few large scale and multiple small scale studies. Broadly, there isevidence that K-12 engineering activities sometimes enhance science and mathematics learning,but this is dependent on effective integration, an issue that has been noted elsewhere [20]. Forinstance, students who participated in Project Lead the Way had
commonly and classically taught, tendsto remove the human and social context from consideration. While the EPS method produceswell-posed problems with easily checked solutions, it unintentionally reinforces the worldviewthat engineering is value-free profession where the rigor of one’s technical analysis is moreimportant than the context in which engineering is practiced1. Recognizing this consequence, agrowing body of literature calls for changing engineering education to be more human-centeredthrough awareness of the limitations of purely technical solutions2-5.Changing one’s approach to teaching in this way poses big challenges: how to add ideas to anoverstuffed curriculum—particularly ideas that involve a disciplinary background different
student designed projects), a course in biomedical ethics, and oversees an off-site undergraduate clinical experience. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Sophomore Design Course on Virtual Prototyping1. IntroductionA sophomore-level design course (BME282) teaches students how to apply the design process toa biomedical product. Course objectives are for students to be able to: (1) apply principles fromcourses they have completed and from courses that they will take in their BME curriculum tobiomedical product design and development to determine quantitative design constraints criticalto biomedical device design and (2) integrate these principles and resultant design constraints
concept-mapping approach both reduces the cognitive load, andimproves learning achievements of the students. Triplett et al. 18 propose Concept-in-Contextmaps (CCmaps) to link a wide array of different types of information that reflect the organizationof content within a topical area in an introductory materials course.While concept maps are deemed to be a good tool to portray knowledge structure and diagnoselearner’s misconception, we are more interested in their integration with generic learningparadigms and in this regard, our research shows the combination of active learning strategy withconcept mapping has led to plausible results for student oriented learning. Tembe and Kamble 19have studied 414 concept maps from 207 basic school students
, manage, and improve operations. Skills Include: Systems Integration Planning RFP Development/Grant Writing Technical management including software development, system administration , telecommunications Professional Development Process Re-engineering Disaster Recovery End User Training ERP Design/Implementation IT Manage- ment Project Management Solution Engineering Systems SupportProf. Dennis O. Owen, Purdue University Dennis Owen is an Associate Professor of Computer and Information Technology at Purdue University. His primary teaching interests include application development and computer hardware. He is active in recruiting and curriculum transformation. c American Society for
construction of reality in the child (M. Cook, Trans.). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1955.[7] L. Vygotsky, Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1962.[8] M. Alias, T. A. Lashari, Z. A. Akasah, M. J. Kesot, Translating theory into practice: integrating the affective and cognitive learning dimensions for effective instruction in engineering education. European Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 39 No. 2, 212- 232, 2014.[9] O.A. Hassan, Learning Theories and Assessment Methodologies – An Engineering Educational Perspective. European Journal of Engineering Education Vol. 36 No. 4, 327–339, 2011.13 | P a g e
Paper ID #19742Freshman Design Course: Device Design for Low-Resource SettingsDr. Emma K. Frow, Arizona State University Emma Frow is an Assistant Professor at Arizona State University, with a joint appointment in the School of Biological & Health Systems Engineering and the School for the Future of Innovation in Society. She has graduate training in both the natural and social sciences, with a PhD in biochemistry and an MSc in science & technology studies. Emma is interested in the engineering imagination, particularly in the emerging field of synthetic biology. Over the past 7 years, her curricular and