roles for the second vignette, a capstone design scenario. One student was designated the “Team Leader”, one the “Team Member”, and the rest were “Observers”. In this vignette, the Team Member was to express concerns about calculation results, and the Team Leader was to respond in a such a way as to promote psychological safety. During the debrief for each vignette, the Observers led the discussion by sharing what they saw that promoted psychological safety and what they saw that hindered or removed it.Methods: This project was predicated on the research question: Does teaching psychological safety improve teaming experiences for first-year students? We hypothesized that we could improve students’ team interactions by directly
worldengineering fundamentals in order to solve real-world actual EXPLORE a contrarian view of accepted solutionsproblems. Some instructors who teach the senior-level CONNECTIONSengineering courses such as senior capstone design course ENTREPRENEURIAL INTEGRATE information from manyand elective courses may adapt and/or use the project-based MINDSET sources to gain insightlearning (PTBL) and/or experiential learning (EL) for the
members of Marwa Village. The conclusion was that thecommunity had the desire and organizational capacity to be a strong partner for aninternational water development project. A multi-disciplinary team was assembled, traveled toMarwa in May 2016, and established the foundation that would evolve into a multi-year, multi-phase community development project: Maji Marwa. The Maji Marwa project was introduced to students as a capstone project option in theundergraduate civil engineering program and has expanded to collaboration amongst twouniversities, five colleges and participation from over 175 students. The rainwater harvestinginitiatives goal was to collaborate with in-country partners to construct three rainwaterharvesting (RWH) systems
impacts are not primary learning goals for the course Graduate-level course 34 Senior capstone design 28 First year introductory course that include ethics among other topics 24 First year design-focused course that includes ethics among other learning 21 goals Professional issues course (any level; e.g. project management, 14 communications) Other 14 Full course
in engineering capstonecourses as they form teams, seek professional positions in the workplace, and/or make decisionsto continue on to graduate school during their last year of undergraduate studies. Further, understanding persistence of Latinx is particularly imperative given that they arethe nation’s largest minority group and among its fastest growing populations [3]. As such, thisresearch project will contribute to the national conversation on broadening participation ofLatinx. The site of this research investigation is “Border University” (BU), which serves alargely Mexican-origin population in a region of Texas with one of the lowest median incomes[4]. In particular, we focus on the senior capstone course where students work in
exclusion from high-profile team roles [5-9].Recent research indicates that first-year, team-based design courses represent a uniqueopportunity to address such disparities and providing early collaborative learning experiencessupports the success of students from underrepresented groups in engineering [10-13]. Whilelectures and readings may provide teams with basic tools for team and project management,these correlate team success with the creation of a high-quality final design [14]. Such tools mayinadvertently cue students to distribute work according to stereotypical social roles in the beliefthat by having team members “play to their strengths,” they are doing what is best for the team[15]. Such task distribution may limit new learning across
Paper ID #32395Lessons Learned Developing and Running a Virtual, Faculty-Led,International Program on Sustainable Energy in BrazilDr. Courtney Pfluger, Northeastern University Dr. Courtney Pfluger an Associate Teaching Professor at Northeastern University in the College of Engi- neering. In 2011, she joined Northeastern as a teaching professor in the First Year Engineering program. As part of the First Year Engineering faculty she focusing on curriculum innovations and implementing educational lessons and engineering design projects on sustainability. In 2017, she moved full time into the Chemical Engineering department
engineering students participating in virtual team projects was used in theanalysis. Results from the analysis are presented suggesting a statistically significant impact ofthe intervention on self-management skills when comparing randomly assigned teams with andwithout the intervention. The intervention is designed to be scalable so that it can be embeddedinto existing project-based courses. Our findings have important implications for thedevelopment of teamwork skills in engineering courses and provide evidence of a successfulstrategy that can be integrated into the existing engineering curriculum.KeywordsVirtual teams, team effectiveness, information and communication technologies, engineeringeducation, collaborative learningIntroductionThe
instructors plan to attempt to augment the participation from the disciplines outside ECE by incorporating short modules in core classes of the subject areas of human factors, cybersecurity, and other relevant disciplines to introduce the concept or ResCS and encourage participation in the ResCS course. To provide more in depth exploration and completeness of projects the ResCS course will have an optional second semester structured as an undergraduate capstone or graduate thesis support to encourage completion of concepts into implemented designs. The team seeks to disseminate the successes of the course and the Grid Game to other universities and continue to encourage related disciplines at universities to participate in this interdisciplinary
Building using Fiber Composite Jacketing Yasser S. Salem1 and Felipe J. Perez2 1 Professor, Civil Engineering Department, Cal Poly Pomona 2 Associate Professor, Civil Engineering Department, Cal Poly PomonaAbstractAs a senior capstone project, students worked on the vulnerability assessment and seismic retrofitof a six-story non-ductile reinforced concrete dual system building comprised of perimeter non-ductile reinforced concrete moment frames and non-ductile core shear walls. Students were giventhe as-built plans and specification of an existing building in Southern California that is consideredto be at risk, from an earthquake resistant standpoint. Students performed
gratefully acknowledge the support of the National Science Foundation awardnumber 1626362. Dr. Abby Ilumoka is the program manager. The authors offer their sincerethanks to all of the students that have participated in the Vertically-Integrated Projects team onHands-On Learning at Georgia Tech..References:[1] N.G. Holmes and C.E. Wieman, “Introductory physics labs: We can do better,” PhysicsToday, Vol. 71, No. 1, 38 (2018); doi: 10.1063/PT.3.3816[2] M. Koretsky, C. Kelly, and E. Gummer, “Student Perceptions of Learning in the Laboratory:Comparison of Industrially Situated Virtual Laboratories to Capstone Physical Laboratories,Journal of Engineering Education, Vol 100, No. 3, pp 540-573, 2011.[3] A. Hofstein and V.N. Lunetta, V.N., "The Laboratory in
was the only girl in class among guys but over theyears I’ve worked past this.” Another student noted, “Professors speeding along courseworkbecause majority of the students which [sic] are dominantly males who already work in this field,already know this. Not giving enough time or breaking it down clear enough for you to actuallylearn what is being taught. It’s just being shown.” Yet another female student pointed to “Timemanagement since I am a housewife” as a major challenge. 90 80 70 60 50 Male 40 Female 30 20 10 0 Individual in- Team projects capstone project other class practiceFigure 3
-efficacy beliefs and outcome expectations [1].The belonging component includes a set of activities to develop professional identity and senseof belonging. Activities such as establishing learning communities through project-orientedengineering teams, aim at developing freshmen and sophomores’ interactions with seniorstudents via capstone and design-oriented courses. These interactions are structured around twoone-credit courses, Introduction to Engineering (INGE-3001) and Introduction to LearningCommunities (INGE-3002).In the formative component, interventions in the form of talks and soft-skill workshops are aimedat training students using well-known high-impact educational practices [21]. Trainings basedon the Affinity Research Group (ARG) model
research project investigating the development and measurement of general learning outcomes. Natalie comes from an Australian Senior-Secondary/ Post-Secondary teaching background, with experience at the State-wide level in curriculum development, large-scale assessment, and evaluation and assessment of outcomes based education.Dr. James A. Kaupp, Queen’s University Assessment and Quality Assurance Coordinator (Msc ’06, PhD ’12) at Queen’s University, Kingston, On- tario, Canada in the Faculty of Engineering and Applied Science. Educational research interests include engineering education development, cultural change in higher education, higher-order thinking develop- ment and assessment, outcomes-based data-informed
courses.Dr. Robin Fowler, University of Michigan Robin Fowler is a lecturer in the Program in Technical Communication at the University of Michigan. She enjoys serving as a ”communication coach” to students throughout the curriculum, and she’s especially excited to work with first year and senior students, as well as engineering project teams, as they navigate the more open-ended communication decisions involved in describing the products of open-ended design scenarios. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Experimental evidence regarding gendered task allocation on teamsAbstractStudent teams negotiate many aspects of collaboration, including task division on teams. Somestudies
engineering design capstone course [13] [14].One group of educators identified a need for increased knowledge of sustainability, so theydeveloped a module with learning objectives that included definitions of basic concepts ofsustainability, sustainable development, the triple bottom line, cradle-to-cradle, life-cycleassessment and whole-system thinking, accompanied by application of the Envision ratingsystem to an infrastructure project [13]. The authors concluded that, although their PowerPointpresentation and assessment assisted in students achieving lower levels of development, deeperlearning and higher levels of achievement would require a dedicated sustainability engineeringcourse [13]. Another author described how the EnvisionTM rating system
Service-Learning. He was a co-recipient of the National Academy of Engineering’s Bernard Gordon Prize for Innovation in Engi- neering and Technology Education and the recipient of the National Society of Professional Engineers’ Educational Excellence Award and the ASEE Chester Carlson Award. He is a fellow of the American Society for Engineering Education and the National Society of Professional Engineers.Mr. Ashish, Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi, India Ashish had been working with RuTAG IIT Delhi as a P.A. Tech. for the past five years. He has conducted extensive research on rural problems and worked on community-based projects aimed at improving the livelihoods of marginalized people. Ashish’s commitment to
instructor for several courses including Introduction to Engineering, Introduction to Materials and Manufacturing, and Structural and Chemical Characterization of Materials.Dr. Robin Fowler, University of Michigan Robin Fowler is a lecturer in the Program in Technical Communication at the University of Michigan. She enjoys serving as a ”communication coach” to students throughout the curriculum, and she’s especially excited to work with first year and senior students, as well as engineering project teams, as they navigate the more open-ended communication decisions involved in describing the products of open-ended design scenarios. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Gender
the students are more deeply exposed to designmethodologies. Within their senior year, students are required to complete an individual seniordesign (capstone) project, in which they apply their skills and knowledge to a project of theirchoosing. The Harvard-HKUST International Design Experience is positioned so that studentscan use the design thinking and project management skills that they have developed throughoutthe summer, in addition to the introductory design project within their engineering discipline, tobetter prepare for the more advanced multi-disciplinary project courses required in the junior andsenior years. Unlike the Harvard students, the students from HKUST had little or no exposure todesign thinking and methods prior to the
lessons learned along the way to make both Cornerstoneapproaches successful. A description of various projects and themes used to create the projectbased courses is included. Overall results show that the Cornerstone approach is successful andhas created a positive student culture centered on the projects and the learning center wherestudents work. Students have seen a positive improvement in their perspectives on engineeringand self-efficacy in their abilities to become an engineer.IntroductionFollowing a successful pilot, the first-year engineering program at Northeastern Universitydecided to adopt the “cornerstone to capstone” curriculum design for all incoming first-yearengineering students. The Cornerstone course specifically incorporates
schedule.Choosing appropriate activities tied into themes allowed for consistent reinforcement of not onlythe engineering design process, but also explicit instruction of science concepts. Following asuccessful Capstone Project model, the students concluded the camp by completing theengineering design process to solve a problem that they defined as socially relevant. Figure 1provides a brief description of the activities completed in camp.Pictures of campers doing sample activities:Figure 1: Camp Schedule and Activities Day Theme Activity Description Move into Dorms, Students move into dorm rooms, work with Orientation and
transition from capstone trainingto engineering practice. Engineering education is meant to prepare engineering students for thechallenges of the engineering workplace, but this is not the same as preparing women for the(presumably) gendered experiences of engineering work. This study aims to answer the question:What unique challenges do women face in their first year of engineering work?We ask this question to make way for the question: What should women be prepared for intransitioning to engineering work?We attempt to answer our main research question with a qualitative analysis of data from a largerstudy, the [Project] study. Data comes in the form of 98 interviews with 45 engineeringnewcomers, at 3, 6, and 12 months of engineering work. Of the
. As a result, it is hoped that the students will determine an effective collaborative learningapproach that informs each others’ areas of interest regarding international developmentsustainability, while building a knowledge base for better understanding the interrelationshipsamong these disciplines to evaluate long-term interactions between an engineered infrastructureand a recipient community.We emphasize that this course is not design-based, such as an Engineering Capstone project, nordoes it teach technical design. Instead, it focuses engineering minds on the non-engineeringinfluences that must be considered to produce a successful, sustainable engineering design for arecipient outside the designers’ own sociocultural experience.Course
of identifying speakers, alumni, and faculty that provided career advice,any recurrent issues and themes among their students and inspired interesting research possibilities for theregardless of the course they were enrolled in. This strategy capstone class (CSC 698; fall 2016, spring 2017). We alsowas repeated twice over the course of the semester. After hosted a poster session of 698 projects, which was thenthese workshops, the mentors met to discuss and vote on
projects are present infirst-year engineering courses, senior capstone projects, and more recently, second and third-year courses [4, 5, 6]. These team interactions demonstrate practical knowledge skills by taskinggroups of students with complex problems. While research on student engineering teams is ex-tensive, few studies to date have explored how students’ intersecting identities impact their expe-riences on teams, particularly at the intersection of race and gender. (Note: in discussing gender,we use the terms “man/men,” “woman/women,” “non-binary,” and “trans-men/women” for gen-eral discussions; when referencing previous research, we use the term used by the researchers;when referencing our participants, we use the term “female” because, as
abilities to incorporate sustainability into capstone design projects in ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. 2013. Atlanta, GA.25. L., C.A. and M.C. A., Teaching sustainability as a contested concept: Captializing on variation in engineering educators’ conceptions of environmental, social, and economic sustainability. J. Clean. Prod., 2008. 16: p. 105.26. A., Y., S. D., L.M. A., and B. C., Problem-based learning: Influence on students’ learning in an electrical engineering course. J. Eng. Educ., 2011. 100: p. 253.27. Sattler, M.L., Y.P. Weatherton, V. Chen, S.P. Mattingly, and K.J. Rogers, Engineering sustainable civil engineers, in American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference &
.). These attributes are akin to competencies. Therefore, all futureengineers must develop solutions to complex engineering problems (A04 - design) whileconsidering differentiated social impacts based on gender, gender identity, and other identityfactors during the design of an engineering product or process (A09 - engineering's impact).The following example demonstrates the application of GBA+ in a capstone student project. Thisproject focuses on the design of a robotic arm intended for quadriplegic individuals. In thisexample, GBA+ allows for the consideration of various identity factors to design a robotic armadapted to the diverse realities of quadriplegic individuals. First and foremost, the factor ofdisability is central to the development of
has been achieved in successfully chairing ten or more graduate student culminating projects, theses, or dissertations, in 2011 and 2005. He was also nominated for 2004 UNI Book and Supply Outstanding Teaching Award, March 2004, and nominated for 2006, and 2007 Russ Nielson Service Awards, UNI. Dr. Pecen is an Engineering Tech- nology Editor of American Journal of Undergraduate Research (AJUR). He has been serving as a re- viewer on the IEEE Transactions on Electronics Packaging Manufacturing since 2001. Dr. Pecen has served on ASEE Engineering Technology Division (ETD) in Annual ASEE Conferences as a reviewer, session moderator, and co-moderator since 2002. He served as a Chair-Elect on ASEE ECC Division in
Paper ID #12608Students Writing for Professional Practice: A Model for Collaboration amongFaculty, Practitioners and Writing SpecialistsProf. Susan Conrad, Portland State University Susan Conrad, Ph.D., is a Professor of Applied Linguistics and head of the Civil Engineering Writing Project. She has written numerous articles and books about English grammar, discourse, and corpus linguistics.Dr. William A Kitch P.E., California State Polytechnic University, Pomona Dr. Kitch is a Professor of Civil Engineering at Cal Poly Pomona. Before starting his academic career he spent 24 years as a practicing engineer in both the
report the results oflaboratory activities and projects in various formats that require strong communication skills.Much of the knowledge, skills, and abilities students gain in this class is used during the yearlongcapstone course the following year in the recommended curriculum.IntroductionThe stated purpose of the Thermal Fluid Science lecture and lab course is for students to learnskills and gain a level of knowledge that will allow them to be successful in laboratory and testsettings in industry and academia. The learning outcomes stated in the course syllabus are: - Students will: 1. Be able to design experiments to characterize a temperature, pressure, mass flow rate within a region of fluid, system or subsystem