yearimplementation of the TDGs, group discussion focused on group leader planning and progress,the role of the group leaders, and successes with the group and concerns about the group. Forexample in September, the discussion focused on the nature of the meetings. One group leaderstated, “we plan to meet once a month.” Later in the semester, group leaders discussed the natureof their interactive teaching changes. One group leader, “I ask questions… on notecards… [thestudents] have a choice: to ask me a question or being asked a question. And they getmicrophones and I call like 30 cards a session. So, it is part of the whole lecture experience.” Inthe second semester, discussion focused on the progress of teaching development groupmembers toward making
Students 1 Give examples of previous project designs Attend team meetings outside of class time (including open 2 labs, presentation practice, planning meetings, etc.) Give examples of previous technical communication 3 deliverables 4 Rehearse their ROV/bathysphere presentation 5 Give feedback on reports 6 Help with technical content 7 Provide other
materials. Teachers work in pairswith faculty and student researchers in efforts focused on addressing 21st century grandchallenges in engineering in three areas: (1) improved efficiency polymer solar cells, (2) highperformance polymers and composites from renewable feedstocks, and (3) environmental impactof synthetic materials in sea water.RET participants receive a stipend of $5000 for their summer research and receive an additional$1500 stipend during the school year for participation in planned activities. Additional fundswere made available for materials & supplies for implementation of the school activities and fortravel to the MS Science Teachers Association, American Chemical Society meeting and othertechnical/educational
the end of the semester if their project areassubmission was selected. These mentors can plan and engage with teams if they so choose duringthe summer prior to the year-long design course.Results and DiscussionThis model gave both leaders and team members the opportunity to experience clinicalobservation and shifted the logistical burden from the few faculty to the ~14 team leaders and theclinicians promoting their projects of interest. Completing this training ahead of the design teamcourse allowed teams to start with a deeper understanding of medical needs and applications oftheir project need and practical clinical constraints, a working relationship with their clinicalmentor, and primer on team and project management. Survey data
course on Microfluidics. Results of student self-assessment survey according tosix ABET learning outcomes show that students judged the lab as a strongly positive learningexperience. Direct assessment data of student learning is not available at this point of time. Theauthors plan to make the kit available to Biomedical Engineering Education community afterfurther testing and development. Table I Topics covered in the instructional material Subject Topics Cell Biology Extracellular Matrix (ECM) and its impact to cell function Cell adhesion mechanism Biomedical implications of cell adhesion behavior, example: anoikis and change in cell adhesion behavior of cancer
for the program. For example,Wake Technical Community College has a 2+3 program (i.e., students complete two years at acommunity college, followed by three years at a university) with NC State from which most ofthe NCSU STEM Scholarship Program’s transfer students originate. Applications are filedthrough the program web site, which collects applicants’ demographic, personal information,future career plans, interests and any relevant information prior to the face-to-face interview.Applicants are screened for pre-requisites fulfillment (minimum GPA, residence status,disciplines) and invited for a face-to-face interview with the program coordinators.RenewalSince the start of the program, the coordinators have been productive working together
important.” Table 1. Conceptions of Design InstrumentList of Design Activities InstructionsAnalyzing data Gathering Modeling Selection: Which 5 would you information consider the MOST/LEAST importantBalancing Planning in terms of producing a high qualitybenefits & trade- Generating design?offs alternatives Prototyping Open-ended response: For one of theBrainstorming Identifying
City, CA/ 2School of Engineering, San Francisco State University, San Francisco, CAAbstractResearch experience is enriching and inspiring for undergraduate students. Research experienceson advanced technologies are far from reach in undergraduate level studies. In this paper, wepresent an approach to address this gap via summer research opportunities for undergraduatestudents. The internship is planned over 10 weeks, and the student interns are assigned agraduate student mentor and a faculty advisor. This paper presents the details of the project,research and educational objectives, results obtained, and the student surveys assessing theoutcomes. The planned research project is related to the Spin Transfer Torque
: built into the key program features were evaluation criteriathat efforts be “radically, suddenly, or completely new; producing fundamental, structuralchange; or going outside of or beyond existing norms and principles” [6]. With an innovativedepartment head or dean at the helm, change had to be rooted in engineering education research,a social science understanding of organizations, and a theoretical change framework that couldmove research to practice, with team composition reflecting this varied expertise. Facultydevelopment efforts, incorporation of professional practice, and a plan for scalability thatcountered anticipated obstacles had to be baked in to the original vision and project plan.With NSF investing relatively large amounts of
available lesson plans, such as those available atteachengineering.org to include specific constraints and performance measures, as well as toensure multiple points of entry, depending on a student’s prior knowledge. (Task lesson plansand supporting materials are available upon request.) The tasks were also aligned to the relevantstate curriculum standards for high school biology. Quantitative surveys, including measures ofgroup psychological safety, were administered to all participating students (n=185) in a total of51 groups. The affective component of the problem-solving space was measured using Edmondson’s(1999) Psychological Safety scale, while controlling for perceptions of the cognitive dimension, measuredwith the Group Interaction
2 Practices for Conducting Engineering Research Student Presentations: Research 5 3 Topic and Plan of Work Special Topics in Mechanical 7 4 Engineering: Acoustics (Guest Lecture) My Experiences in Graduate 9 5 School (Guest Lecture) How to Create a Research Poster 11 6
intentionally ¾ female, ¼ male.When reviewing statistics such as those stated above, men hold positions in engineering andcomputer science at rates much higher than women. Therefore, instructors felt that it was crucialto portray participants (male or female) with role models in engineering while at camp.2016 Logistics/ScheduleWith the change of camp from one continuous week to a single day, it was crucial that theschedule and structure of the single day be well planned to optimize for substantial connectionswith students. Therefore, students were randomly divided into two groups at the beginning of theday (to minimize transition time throughout the day) using pairs of playing cards. Each day,camp began around 8:30 am, concluding with a ceremony ending
Team and Initial organization description: Establishing a team with a diverse set of skills advice: • Bring a social scientist onto the team as early as possible • Create sub-teams, assign tasks, and define roles that play to team members’ strengths.Project Management and Maintaining Flexibility description: Defining a workflow and establishing deadlines for accountability, while also maintaining flexibility to deal with internal and external changes. advice: • Do not underestimate the time different elements of the project, like assessment, will take. • Have a plan and start early. • Respond
mechanical engineering machine shop). This was due to anadmitted level of unfamiliarity with the subtleties of the new wave of low-cost commercialtechnology, being concerned about operation of such equipment in uncontrolled andunsupervised environments, being concerned about unattended operation and earthquake safety,etc. Since that time, the Maker Lab remains the single deployment point for the School ofEngineering (apart from more controlled shops); however, other entities in the University aremaking plans for small scale maker-like labs in their areas.Apart from these initial start-up and safety-related issues, it is interesting to note the potential tohave centralized vs. decentralized maker spaces. As maker technologies become even
mathematics learning creatively while working within a friendly team structure.Some participants were surprised that these projects were related to bigger projects that involveengineers in the real world and reported considering career options along these lines. Self-efficacy. Many of the participants mentioned that they were confident in their mathematics andscience abilities. The following is an example stated confidently by a sixth grader: “I’m great atmath, and I like it!” Others expressed the desire to take advanced math classes as this eighth grade 16participant stated, “I already do [take advanced math classes], so I was planning on it, to still dothat.” While their sense of
the 1980s, and has since been adopted for use in commercial and academicapplications14. The model is depicted as having two separate prongs, which can be referred to asthe “decomposition and definition” stream and the “integration and verification” stream. Thisapproach is comprised of a variety of phases which include: defining user requirements,generating system concepts and validation plans, developing performance specifications andverification plans, subsystem and component decomposition, subsystem assembly andverification, system validation, and system operation and maintenance planning. Although thevee model was not developed to be entirely iterative, each of the steps present within thedecomposition and definition stream need to cross
math that doesnot relate directly to the topic at hand. Use undergraduate students, family members, otherfaculty and staff, or anyone that you can find to test and discuss your plans. Students especiallycan provide a perspective to help with the streamlining process. A good example of streamliningis provided with the activity in section 4.g. Implementing the activityAt this point, it is time to implement the activity as it has been developed. Make sure to haveextensions or additional activities ready in case the project takes less time than expected. Thefirst time an activity is implemented, it is nearly impossible to predict exactly how it will go. Beprepared for things to go wrong and have as many backup plans as possible. The amount
work versus engineering work amongengineering students soon to graduate, there may be fewer differentiators betweenstudents with engineering-focused plans and those with more unsettled plans. This meansthat there are many contingencies to investigate in terms of how students ultimately landin their first and subsequent jobs within the first few years of graduating. Providing somegranularity to the picture, Brunhaver’s study of recent engineering graduates indicatesthat while the majority of graduates were working in engineering-focused positions fouryears after graduation, about 20% of graduates were working in non-engineering focusedpositions.6 We note that although demographic factors did not seem to differentiatepathways at this stage, co
from three administrations of ATI-22. As mentionedbefore, ATI-22 was administered to all participants to the Teaching Workshop before itstarted (PRE). In the first administration, CFTP members were included. Then, there was asecond administration of the ATI-22 as a post-test (POST-1) at the end of the TeacherWorkshop, in which all participants (including CFTP members) took part. In this case,participants were asked to fill out the ATI-22 thinking about what they planned to do thefollowing semester. We wanted to see whether there was a change due to the workshop.There was a semester-long training program, only for CFTP members, which ended with theadministration of the ATI-22 as a post-test (POST-2). The following subsection of resultspresents
for STEM majors.A recent report of the NAE and the NRC confirms the major endeavor: “Today, several dozendifferent engineering programs and curricula are offered in school districts around the country,and thousands of teachers have attended professional development sessions to teach engineering-related coursework” (NAE & NRC, 2009, p. 1). Numerous programs are developing curriculafocused on engineering to address future workforce need. Some of the more notable programsare A World in Motion (AWIM), Engineering is Elementary (EiE), Project Lead the Way(PLTW), and Full Option Science System (FOSS).Overview of A World in MotionAWIM was initially developed as a collection of teacher lesson plans and has expanded intotoday’s program which is a
interface displays the vector of each sensor in real-time. This tool will be utilized bystudents the next time the Electromagnetic Fields course is offered. The author plans to have thislab repeated with the improved tool to assess the next class of students and determine if the labimproves their level of understanding over this recent class using multiple assessment tools (suchas pre and post lab student surveys), and to test the hypothesis that reducing the gap between datacollection and analysis for the multipoint experiment will improve student understanding ofdivergence, curl, and gradient as reflected in the student lab reports.References[1] I. W. Wait, A. P. Nichols and W. A. Zatar, "Comparison of Learning Styles for International and
project-based learning curriculum integrated into math or science courses (Table 1). Students must conduct laboratory and simulated experiments, carry out analysis, and develop a hands-on model based on their results. Laboratory experiments are described in Table 2. Each lesson consists of PowerPoint presentations and laboratory handouts with student worksheets. It should be noted that the CorrSim II program used in the module is a free software available at (http://corrdefense.nace.org/corrdefense_Spring2014/tech4.asp). Instructor professional development materials are also included, consisting of lesson plans, PBL Learning Experience Design (LED) template, student success rubrics, and instructional material on the laboratory and simulation
making [.451*]{.622**} >4b. Identifying the changing needs of the client [.436**]{.544**} 1c. Maintaining an open climate for discussion [.496*]{.661**} >4c. Anticipating what the client will want next [.270*]{.521**} 2 Developing people (⍺ =.543) 5 Initiating significant change (⍺ =.763) >2a. Encouraging skill development [290*]{.420*} 5a. Initiating bold projects [.947**]{.863**} >2b. Seeing that everyone has a project plan [.606*]{.436**} >5b. Starting ambitious projects [.922**]{.738**} >2c. Coaching people on team issues [.726**]{.809**} >5c. Launching important
teams)throughout the course of the project. The mentoring, and guiding, effort is crucial in achievingthe learning objectives,16 and may be fulfilled by the already-existing office hours, supplementalinstructions, recitation sessions, or planned in-class activities. The project's flexibility means it issuitable for both conventional or flipped model of instruction.The impact of this project is measured by the following methods: 1). Quantitative analysis offinal exam data, including comparison with a control group consisting of multiple terms whereno such project was incorporated. 2). End-of-course student comments. 3.) Anecdotal evidence.The topics to be unified are: • Property relations for ideal gas • Property relations for
positive effects on students’ ability to plan and assess theirown work and to reduce student anxiety and uncertainty about how grades are determined(Panadero & Jonsson, 2013), and these beneficial effects are compounded when students aregiven the opportunity to review and discuss the rubrics with instructors in advance of completingan assignment (Reddy & Andrade, 2010).Our course: Introduction to EngineeringOur course, Introduction to Engineering, is a team-based, project-based engineeringcommunication course that serves as both the introductory engineering course and the first-yearwriting course for incoming engineering students. Ours is only one of between 12-15 sections ofthe course regularly offered each semester, each with a different
and STEM outreach.Dr. Nicole Johnson-Glauch, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Nicole received her B.S. in Engineering Physics at the Colorado School of Mines (CSM) in May 2013. She is currently working towards a PhD in Materials Science and Engineering at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (UIUC) under Professor Angus Rockett and Geoffrey Herman. Her research is a mixture between understanding defect behavior in solar cells and student learning in Materials Science. Outside of research she helps plan the Girls Learning About Materials (GLAM) summer camp for high school girls at UIUC.Prof. Jessica A. Krogstad, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
STEM professionals in a more effective way. Wedescribe the motivation for the tutorials and our approach to designing and developing thetutorials, and provide a list of planned topics. Assessment results are provided for two tutorials,one of which included an exercise that employed CORNET, an Internet-accessible software-defined radio testbed at Virginia Tech. The tutorials were piloted with ten students in agraduate-level software-defined radio course. Based on these results we present conclusions andapproaches for improving the initial tutorial exercise and tutorials and exercises to be developed.1. IntroductionMotivationCommunications systems and techniques can appear abstract to students and STEMprofessionals. For example, introductory
retrieved from secondary sources.2. Consultative: Engineers elicit relevant information from community members. A typical example of a consultative method is semi-structured interviews.23,25-273. Co-constructive: Engineers act as facilitators, working with community members to co- produce an artefact. A typical example of a co-constructive method is participatory mapping, in which community members draw a map of their community with facilitation provided by engineers (or other professionals).25,26The second dimension is organized around three broad design phases: 1) problem framingand planning, 2) information gathering, and 3) problem solving. Within each phase, themethods are organized in groups based on their specific function:1. Problem
mentoring needs vary with the student,4,10,11 the critical qualifications for mentorsare 1) accessibility, 2) expertise in the technical field, 3) the ability to communicate the project'soverall goals and specific plans, 4) the ability to guide the project, 5) "personal concern" for thementee, and 6) approachability (friendliness).4 The latter two factors provide the criticalpersonal relationship between the mentor and undergraduate student.12 This mentor-studentrelationship improves project outcomes because the undergraduate student feels morecomfortable asking for mentor feedback on project ideas, assistance with literature searches andresearch skills, analyzing project results, and suggestions for other experimental approaches. Thementor also
architecture’srequirement satisfaction. DESIGN CYBERLEARING DATABASE ENVIRONMENT CooL:SLiCE PLATFORM SUPPLIER SELECTION MANUFACTURING ANALYSIS Part Process Plan Whole Upper/ Plastic Feedstock Production — Injection Molding