engineering bachelor’s degrees awarded to women from 1999through 2004; values varied in different references2,3,4,5From 1990 to 1993, Seymour6 conducted interviews and focus groups with 335 current andformer science, mathematics and engineering (SME) majors or intended majors on sevencampuses in order to discover the relative importance of factors contributing to the loss ofundergraduates from these majors; 51.9% of all the study participants were women. Seymournotes: “In the process of developing and clarifying their career goals, however, women expressedmore altruism than men and were more likely to switch to career paths that reflectedhumanitarian goals or offered more satisfying work.”6 Based on this research finding, it was ofinterest to look
-qualified pre-college teachers of mathematics, science, and technology.” Thereport’s recommendations include:8 • To make pre-college teaching more competitive with other career opportunities, resources must be provided to support programs in teacher preparation at institutions that succeed in integrating faculty and curricula of schools of engineering and science with schools of education; and • To improve effectiveness of pre-college teaching, stakeholders must collaborate to support outreach efforts to K-12 by science and engineering professionals to motivate high quality curricular standards and expand content knowledge for classroom teachers and support research on learning that better informs K-12
time in the student’s career when they have completed most ofthe required coursework. These types of exams are easy to administer and less open tosubjectivity or bias10 of typical course based work samples. Certification exams provideemployers with a standardized, legitimized, and credible toolset for examining individuals11.Since certification exams are nationally normed across institutions, they provide not only ameasure of individual performance but an indication of the value of the program and curriculumat preparing students for the examination. Success on certification exams is perhaps the mostrecognized and respected performance measure by external constituents. While many faculty and administrators may think that standardized or
; ability to apply engineering &critical thinking skills to engineering analysis, (2) knowledge & skills to design, conduct,evaluate experiments & work in teams, (3) an understanding of professional and ethicalresponsibility, (4) the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineeringsolutions in a global and societal context, and (5) a knowledge of contemporary issues.AssessmentA survey instrument was developed by Duffy et al. [12] which was filled out by 29 out of 40freshmen taking “Introduction to Engineering II”. The average age of these students was 20.These students were asked to rank several attributes representing their career values based ontheir S-L experience
development and began the first steps to unify thesegroups. The organization’s focus is nurturing young academics in STEM fields, but membershipis open to all gender identities and disciplines. Speciality committees that focus on personal andprofessional growth of WISE members have formed within the organization. These specialitycommittees include those interested in academia, industry, or government careers; mental andphysical wellness; international interests; LGBT; and social networking.FundingWithout the support of university administration, WISE would not have been possible. Whilemany resources are available for graduate students and postdocs around the university, unifyingthese resources under a single heading and also tailoring them for what
based on these lessons. Finally, we present several lingering issues and problemsthat still must be addressed.2 The PartnershipThe courses described here were created in a partnership between the University, a local for-profitsoftware development school, and a state funded job training and placement program. This groupwill hereafter be referred to as ”the partnership”. The University provided an experiencedgraduate student to teach the course. The development school provided project management.They also leveraged connections with the local chamber of commerce and technical companies inthe area to secure speakers and guest lecturers for the course. Finally, the career training centerrecruited students, provided connections to scholarships
). Professor Bazylak started his career as a manufacturing engineer in a new product introduction division of a large telecommunication manufacturer. He returned to academia first as an engineering co-operative education coordinator and then as an engineer-in-residence. He joined the University of Toronto as a teaching focused professor where he is heavily involved in design education and diversity studies.Prof. Ruth Childs, University of Toronto Ruth Childs is an associate professor in the Department of Leadership, Higher and Adult Education at the University of Toronto and a past president of the Canadian Educational Researchers’ Association. She teaches courses in research design and measurement theory and has conducted many
(ITEST) program to better understand and promote practices that increase students'motivations and capacities to pursue careers in fields of science, technology, engineering, ormathematics (STEM). The Group-based Cloud Computing (GbCC) for STEM Education Projectinvestigates pre-service teacher designing, developing, implementing, and enacting a socio-technological system for group-centered STEM teaching and learning consistent with anationally recognized pre-service program. The project takes a design-based research approachto creating and studying technologies and materials that support generative teaching and learningin STEM. Computational thinking, including agent-based modeling, and simulation acrossSTEM domains as well as geo-spatial
questions (hydraulic and pneumatic). Semester Question Fall 2016 Spring 20171) Have you ever worked with hydraulic systems within a as a - Yes (2) - Yes (5) - No (21) - No (17) profession professional career? - Yes (2) - Yes (3)2) Have you received any training on safety of hydraulic - No (21) - No (19) systems
engineering1. In addition, globalization has introduced more job opportunitiesabroad along with intense competition for employment. Thus, it is more likely that Americanstudents will see more competition for employment opportunities2. The challenge of how toenhance student competitiveness and competency for a global market propels the continuousreformation of improvement in engineering education. Research studies have shown thatproviding entrepreneurship education could broaden student career choices and perspectives, andprovide an alternative career path for graduates3-4. Motivated by the significant roles ofengineers transferring technology to industry, during the last two decades, hundreds of programswith diverse approaches in entrepreneurship
this course with a high confidence rate. There are too many factors to be able to get a preciseand accurate evidence such as: student financial problems, lack of interest in any undergraduatestudy, illness, personal issues, or sway from guardians to follow a specific career path. However,feedback from students will be able to improve the transition into the University’s College ofEngineering, as well as providing useful information to make the Foundations of Engineeringcourse an experience they greatly appreciate.
of the economy, that doctoralprogram was designed from its inception to raise up a new generation of scholars.However, there are many professionals who find that their lives are incompatible with thetraditional PhD’s structure and philosophy. Take, for example, a working engineer in her 40swho is earning a six-figure salary, has a family (spouse, kids, dog, and mortgage) and is eager toadvance her knowledge and career. Because we offer online master’s education options, she canpop open her laptop and take graduate-level courses in the evening after the house is settled.Once that master’s degree is in hand and she finds herself hungry for the depth and research-intensive experience of doctoral education, though, what options does she have
traditional values [4]. The same survey found that 8 out of 10 Qataris agreed or stronglyagreed that women should be allowed to work out of the home, as shown in Figure 1.Figure 1. Level of Agreement with this Statement: “A married woman should be allowed to workoutside the home if she wants.” [4]While these changes in the behavior and perception of Qatari females indicates that the broadersociety values their pursuit of education and employment, problems still exist. A recent study offemale engineering students in Qatar found that they experienced gender bias from bothprofessors and male peers, as well as companies in the engineering industry [5]. The transitionfrom university to an engineering career has been shown to be a significant factor in the
spatial visualization. He teaches courses at the University of Illinois where he serves as the Director of Undergraduate Programs for the Department of Aerospace Engineering. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Towards Understanding Interrelated Growth Mindset and Spatial Visualization Skill Training Abstract Spatial Visualization skills is a key predictor of students’ academic performance in STEMclasses, retention rate in STEM majors, and future career choice. Previous research focusing onstudents’ spatial visualizations skills has impacted educational practice, including the formation oftargeted training to help
time at Rowan and UMass, she developed a passion for undergraduate education. This passion led her to pursue a career as a lecturer, where she could focus on training undergraduate chemical engineering students. She has been teaching at UK since 2015 and has taught Fluid Mechanics, Thermodynamics, Computational Tools and the Unit Operations Laboratory. She is especially interested in teaching scientific communication and integration of process safety into the chemical engineering curriculum. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Understanding the gap between communication in the classroom and communication during an industrial internshipAbstractWhile it
]found that in the STEM majors only 58% of students remain in those fields at the end of theirfreshman year. While there are numerous reasons for this attrition, it is likely that a part of theproblem is that first–year engineering students may not have an accurate understanding of theskills necessary for a successful career in engineering. Similarly, these first year students come tothe career with different motivations. The purpose of this research was to better understand theperceptions of first-year engineering students as they entered a program that was developed witha hands-on, practical focus in order to prepare students for industry after graduation. Because ofthe program’s foundational idea being that the BS in Engineering is an
education. We have collected data from undergraduate junior-standingengineering modeling and design students at our university through a longitudinal studyspanning the last three years. The statistical analysis has helped us identify important factors thatcan influence success of students in their future engineering careers. These include problemsolving, communication, and logical thinking skills, perception of self-efficacy to developstudents’ self-belief, and their course grades. The purpose of present work is to examine theeffect of PBL activities on engineering students’ grades and self-efficacy. Furthermore, weinvestigate whether there is a difference between students’ course grades based on their genderafter engaging in PBL activities
) more than 15 years ago that perked his interest in joining theengineering professoriate. ITM is still running to this day and it is by far the largest gathering ofracial/ethnic minority PhD scholars who are interested in faculty careers in academia, includingmany McNair Scholars. A closer examination of the 2019 ITM roster reveals that only 36 of the113 R1 schools studied in this paper sent college representatives to this important gathering. Thisdoes not inspire confidence about the commitment of the engineering professoriate to movebeyond symbolic gestures and addressing this disparity.Much has been written about strategies and practices that can promote a more robust applicantpool and a fairer selection process [4]. Lessons can be learned
Texas A&M University, post- graduate training in evaluation at The Evaluators Institute (TEI) at George Washington University and the AEA/CDC Summer Evaluation Institute. Besides teaching, she has worked as an evaluator in grants awarded by the National Science Foundation (NSF), National Institutes of Health (NIH), US Department of Agriculture (USDA), and National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). Currently she is the internal evaluator for the projects Recruiting, Retaining and Engaging Academically Talented Students from Economically Disadvantaged Groups into a Pathway to Successful Engineering Careers (PEARLS) and for Building Capacity at Collaborative Undergraduate STEM Program in Resilient and
Computer Scienceparticipated in the CDI resulting in five redesigned courses. In the following sections, theredesign of two courses incorporating HIP principles is summarized. This is the first step of aspiral approach to a systematic course design of the engineering and computing sciencescurriculum. These two courses are at the freshmen and sophomore levels. More undergraduatecourses in the sophomore and junior will be pipelined for a redesign embedding HIPs and activestudent engagement strategies.Redesign of the Career Discovery (ETCS 105) CourseThe Career Discovery course, (ETCS 105), normally taken by engineering freshmen students,was redesigned in the CDI. The main goal of the redesign is to help students to gain anunderstanding of how to
the fields of engineering.When speaking in general, it’s evident that Science, Technology, Engineering and Math (STEM)occupations have a low representation among Underrepresented Minorities (URMs). According to theNational Science Foundation, jobs that involve science or engineering show a low percentage ofemployed African Americans [1]. As of 2015, African Americans that identify with one race are roughly4 percent engineers and 3 percent physical and related scientists.These statistics give rise to the question why; why are URMs not pursuing careers in engineering?BackgroundOld Dominion University (ODU) is recognized as a minority serving institution with a plurality of racesrepresented. The student population consists of 26.2 percent
engagement continuum is to sparknew initiatives across the educational ecosystem.Generally speaking, the steady production of diverse STEM graduates is accomplished through adependable pipeline of diverse student cohorts who are competent and prepared for STEMeducation at 2- and 4-year institutions. When done effectively, STEM pipeline developmentconnects higher education, families, K-12 educators, community organizations, and industrypartners as well as provides a spectrum of meaningful experiences towards skill developmentand career preparation. In addition to strengthening the connectivity among partners, a successfulSTEM pipeline brings with it a multiplier effect that overflows into other aspects of communitybuilding, so it has essentially a
on several NSF-funded projects related to design, including an NSF Early CAREER Award entitled ”CAREER: Engineering Design Across Navajo Culture, Community, and Society” and ”Might Young Makers be the Engineers of the Future?,” and is a Co-PI on the NSF Revolutionizing Engineering Departments grant ”Additive Innovation: An Educational Ecosystem of Making and Risk Taking.” He was named one of ASEE PRISM’s ”20 Faculty Under 40” in 2014, and received a Presidential Early Career Award for Scientists and Engineers from President Obama in 2017.Dr. Micah Lande, Arizona State University Micah Lande, Ph.D. is an Assistant Professor in the Engineering and Manufacturing Engineering pro- grams and Tooker Professor at the
toinvestigate these ‘critical’ entrepreneurship experiences among engineering students includingthe impacts they have. The study applied the critical incident technique in a narrative format toelicit and thoroughly investigate three senior engineering student’s entrepreneurship experienceswho were very involved in advancing multiple entrepreneurial projects during theirundergraduate education. The study reports these critical experiences and their impacts in anarrative format with rich detail. The findings suggest that entrepreneurship funding programsand classes are primarily involved in catalyzing powerful student experiences that have profoundeffects including changes in attitudes, behavior, and altered career goals. This study overallprovides
students to face accessibility andsocialization issues.As a result, DHH students often face significant barriers in pursuing their educational goals,especially if they wish to pursue engineering careers. Transition communities can aid studentswho are deaf or hard of hearing adjust to new multimodal environments and enhance their abilityto access classroom information.There were about 138,000 deaf and hard of hearing students in college nationwide in 2010(Walter, 2010). State and federal efforts in support of Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of1973 and the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 have enabled deaf students to attend theschools of their choice and obtain support. As a result, over the 38 years between 1972 and 2010,the
Dominion University c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Advancing the Engineering Field: Opportunities to Support Transfer StudentsAbstract: Advancements in technology have made it vital that technicians advance their skills tostay current and competitive in the job market. Many technicians choose to transfer tobaccalaureate programs in engineering and other STEM fields in order to advance their skills. Asa result, engineering programs usually have a large population of transfer students. Many oftransfer students are studying while employed in the field and some juggle a career and familywhile advancing their education. Accordingly, transfer students
generation adds excitement and variety tothe implemented laboratory. The laboratory has been implemented for upper elementary andmiddle school students in an informal setting without formal surveys and feedback. This paperconcentrates on discussing the implementation for high school students enrolled in the GO-CAPS program [2]. This progressive program provides high school students a unique andyearlong learning experience to explore future career options [2]. Participating schools in theGreater Ozarks area, in Missouri (USA), are allotted a number of seats in the program. Studentsfrom the participating schools apply for the GO-CAPS program in their choice of area. The GO-CAPS board selects students based on the student’s interest and willingness to
. Yeter is currently a Postdoctoral Researcher in the INSPIRE Research Center in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. He obtained his PhD in Curriculum and Instruction empha- sizing in Engineering Education and Master’s degree in Petroleum Engineering at Texas Tech University. He is highly interested in conducting research within the Engineering Education framework. Recently, he received the Early Career Researcher Award from European Science Education Research Association (ESERA) in 2017. In addition, he is one of two scholarship recipients awarded by National Association for Research in Science Teaching (NARST) to attend the ESERA summer research confer- ˇ e Budˇejovice, Czech Republic in
Instruction EvaluationFigure 5. Unfair all the way around. Objectives Instruction EvaluationTo summarize, teaching and learning are improved when a course is built around appropriatecourse objectives and PIs, especially if they are stated and understood by the instructor and thestudents [24]. When PIs are taught and accomplished, student success is improved, coursemanagement is improved, career readiness is improved, and career advancement is accelerated.ABET accreditation and most outcomes assessment plans require PIs.How to Survive and ThriveThis section is included to provide advice on how to do well in the teaching, scholarship, andservice domains and successfully work toward tenure and promotion with the
, which hasbeen identified as often matching the preferred learning styles for many female students(Gollnick & Chinn, 2013). Another key program component is experiences of how engineeringis a field in which people can help others, a factor which has been identified as aligning withfemale interests and career aspirations (USDOC, 2011; Hubelbank 2007).The program research focuses on three areas: 1. The program’s impact on short-term interest andknowledge in engineering/STEM; 2. The effectiveness of matching lessons to learning goals; and3. Differences between sixth-grade students and eighth-grade students in success, interest inactivities, and problem solving methods. Through pre-program and post-program surveys,students answered Likert-scale