, students need tosee themselves represented in success stories and in role models in specific fields. Withoutseeing themselves in these success stories, their confidence to succeed academically and withcareer aspirations will be impacted. Identity-conscious advising (1) understands intersectionality,(2) recognizes systemic barriers, (3) promotes inclusive excellence, and (4) supports “wholestudent” identity and development. Best practices for identity-conscious advising requiresadvisor development across areas of cultural competency, identity awareness, bias recognition,and intersectionality, as well as recruitment of diverse advisors for showcasing broadrepresentation of success to the student body. Identity-conscious advising also requires
2015 taking online courses learning how to construct and deliver online courses. This resulted in a MSEd from Purdue University in Learning Design and Technology (LDT). This widely varied background prepared me well for my next big adventure. Beginning in August 2018 I became the Texas A and M Professor of Practice for the Texas A and M Engineering Academy at Blinn College in Brenham. Texas A and M Engineering Academies are an innovative approach to providing the planet with more Aggie Engineers. My research focus is enhancing the high school through first-year college experience and am an engaged member of the Texas A and M IEEI (Institute for Engineering Education and Innovation). My foundations were set by an
at a non-‐profit or NGO □ Research assistant □ Teaching assistant □ Work-‐study student □ University-‐sponsored extracurricular activities □ Other (please specify):________________________________ □ Briefly tell how any of these experiences have impacted your perspective in this survey. [text box] 13. Future employment: immediately following graduation, which of the following are you most likely to pursue as your primary position? [Select one] □ Working for a “traditional” engineering company (at least 50% focus on engineering practice within one engineering discipline) □ Working for a
also in charge of faculty mentoring in the School of Engineering and Computer Science at OU.Ms. Caymen May Novak, Oakland Unversity Caymen Novak is a current Ph.D. candidate in Biomedical Engineering at the University of Michigan. Her research investigates the influence of mechanical stimulus on ovarian cancer response. She is currently the outreach chair for the Graduate Society of Women Engineers at the University of Michigan where she organizes engineering events for local elementary schools. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 REU programs and K-12 outreach: A natural synergyIntroduction:Since the summer of 2006, the department of Mechanical Engineering at
AC 2012-4902: WORKING COLLABORATIVELY AMONG UNIVERSI-TIES: A DENSE NETWORK APPROACHProf. Cynthia C. Fry, Baylor University Cynthia C. Fry is a Senior Lecturer of computer science and Assistant Dean of the School of Engineering and Computer Science, Baylor University.Dr. Sridhar S. Condoor, Saint Louis University Sridhar Condoor is a professor in the Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering Department. He is also the Program Director for Mechanical Engineering, a KEEN fellow, a Coleman Fellow, and the Editor of the Journal of Engineering Entrepreneurship. Condoor teaches sustainability, product design, and entrepreneurship. His research interests are in the areas of design theory and methodology, technology
oxidative stress in in vitro models of Parkinson’s disease. During her prior graduate and postdoctoral work in neurodegeneration, April mentored several undergraduate, graduate, and clinical researchers and developed new methods for imaging and tracking mitochondria from living zebrafish neurons. In her work for the EERC and Pitt-CIRTL, April Dukes collaborates on educational research projects and facilitates professional development (PD) on instructional and mentoring best practices for current and future STEM faculty. As an adjunct instructor in the Department of Neuroscience at the Univer- sity of Pittsburgh since 2009 and an instructor for CIRTL Network and Pitt-CIRTL local programming since 2016, April is
towards general environmental engineeringand specifically towards water desalination. The exercises were designed to teach basiclaboratory methods and techniques essential for environmental engineering careers either as apracticing engineer or as a graduate student or professional pursuing research. The objectivewas to enhance their learning experiences in laboratory setting. The students were introducedto advanced level desalination experiments based on capacitive deionization (CDI), anemerging and novel purification and desalination technology for low salinity water.Electrochemical Methods and Concept of CDI DesalinationElectrochemical methods such as electro-kinetics and capacitive deionization have been usedin environmental engineering by
Department Head for Graduate Programs in Vir- ginia Tech’s Department of Engineering Education. She has her doctorate in Engineering Education and her strengths include qualitative and mixed methods research study design and implementation. She is/was PI/Co-PI on 8 funded research projects including a CAREER grant. She has won several Virginia Tech awards including a Dean’s Award for Outstanding New Faculty. Her research expertise includes using motivation and related frameworks to study student engagement in learning, recruitment and retention in engineering programs and careers, faculty teaching practices and intersections of motivation and learning strategies. Matusovich has authored a book chapter, 10 journal
; andguiding the learner9. However, developing course objectives and consensus based on theseoutcomes was not trivial. The instructional designer was able to coach the team in this process,and the team eventually arrived at the following course objectives: • Identify and describe the function and properties of agents in a business process • Select the correct tool for decision analysis from a product business toolkit • Perform basic market research • Pitch an idea • Practice management of equals in group dynamics • Evaluate product technical constraints and feasibilityUsing these objectives as a guide, we then discussed how we would know if and when thestudents had achieved the objectives. Since the short course is not for credit, we
Bachelors Degree in Science in Electrical Engineering. I have interests in renewable energy, and hope that through impor- tant research, I can help impact the world with a more efficient, more environment friendly, and more innovative energy source on which we can fully depend.Dr. Hiram Moya, University of Texas, Rio Grande Valley Dr. Hiram Moya earned his Bachelor of Science degree in Industrial Engineering from Texas A&M University at College Station, Texas in 1996. After working in Accenture for 5 years, he founded and became the managing Partner of HMGroup LLP. While working in his firm, Dr. Moya was also taking graduate courses from the University of Texas at Dallas, and online courses from Texas A&M
.2 in Appendix – A.The program is divided in five conceptual phases: (i) lecture and lab phase: the participants areintroduced in fundamental and some advanced concepts in wireless communications andnetworking; (ii) design phase: the participants inspired by the first phase are called to research onpotential educational NGSS STEM lessons with a hands-on wireless labs (activities) usingcomponents of the ‘COSMOS Educational Toolkit’; (iii) development phase: the teachers co-develop with the researchers their best ideas on how to use the wireless labs for NGSS-alignedSTEM lessons; (iv) implementation phase: teachers and students use the developed lessons in theclass during the school year; (v) feedback phase: teachers provide feedback in order
service-learning program enables each student team to maintain along-term relationship with its community partner and to successfully design and deliverproducts that have significant technical complexity and significant community impact. Theprogram is implemented as a track of courses, where a team corresponds to a division or labsection of the course. Each team is large – 8 to 20 students – and vertically integrated –composed of freshmen, sophomores, juniors and seniors. A student may be a member of a teamfor up to four years, registering for 1 to 2 credits each semester. When seniors graduate eachyear, returning students move up a year and new students are added to the team. Many teamshave developed formal training processes for new members
forces that are democratizing innovation, • Why and how, do they democratize innovation, and • The most relevant forces from the student point of viewPeer Assessment: The last step also includes a peer-assessment about their reflection about Userinnovation module activities as described earlier.Connection with the rest of the course: The set of exercise for the User Innovation moduledescribed are designed to be completed during the first three weeks of the semester. Theformation of teams to work on team projects takes place during week four of the semester.Projects start during week five of the course, and it is used to practice the topics covered duringthe rest of the semester. This is designed to practice on how to launch a startup
project. The results of the project: hardware, software and documentationare presented to the faculty in the form of a senior thesis. In completing their senior thesisprojects, the students get to interact with each other, with vendors and manufacturers of softwareand hardware components and spend a great deal of time on the internet searching forinformation on manufacturer specifications and the best components and vendors. For thecapstone project, the computer engineering students use the science, engineering and generaleducation backgrounds acquired over the four year period in the design and implementation. Thisexperience enhances the ability of the students to work on teams. It is hoped that the assessmentdata when collected and analyzed for
as more modules will be added.This is an area in the future for extensive literature searches to learn about best practices. Thelonger term, out-door option will require more attention with the intent of adding PV solartracking, this increasing power production.The authors intend to document this future work, and present those future efforts at the comingASEE conference in 2020.Student Experience and Knowledge Gained:(The following is a review and the personal thoughts about this project by the student workerwho assisted in the design, build, and testing of the PV cart, and also co-authored this paper.) “I am an undergraduate student assisting in design and building of the portable solar power project. My work on the project
Project-based learning (PBL), recognized as a high-impact practice [1, 2], is an increasingly commonfeature in US engineering programs, with implementations ranging from first-year experiences throughcapstone design projects. The Buck Institute of Education, whose work focuses mostly on K-12 education,has articulated a set of essential elements of “Gold Standard PBL” [3] that are readily applicable to thehigher education context: 1. Key Knowledge, Understanding, and Skills: Make clear the learning goals for PBL assignments. Often these are a combination of disciplinary knowledge and transferrable skills and abilities. 2. Challenging Problem or Question: Engage students with a driving problem or question with a suitable level of
interviews, in addition to counseling sessions to helpstudents discern their vocational aspirations. In terms of unconscious bias training and learningto work with other students with empathy, there is a proposal to do that within the context ofCore curriculum classes for all first-year students in the university. This issue is not peculiar toengineering, but needs to be addressed campus-wide.That said, we are creating a task force to look at the first-year experience of engineering. Thetask force is charged with researching best practices elsewhere and making recommendationsregarding what may work at SCU. 6. Make alterations to syllabiCurrent syllabus statements include several mandatory sections, including on reportingdiscrimination and
develop the EOP initiative began with a qualitative study to understand the barriersand opportunities for integrating environmental responsibility (ER) in higher education. At thattime, The Lemelson Foundation was strategically focused on ER and “inventing green” vs.EOP’s now broader scope of sustainability and related professional skills across all engineeringeducation. In 2017, The Lemelson Foundation commissioned a study through asustainability-focused consultancy, Alula Consulting [12], where two experts in sustainability,sustainable design, and engineering education were hired to conduct, analyze, and report thefollowing specific objectives: ● Identify best practices. ● Determine best ways to introduce and maximize ER integration in
system protection course with a lab component. Dr. Dolloff received a B.S.E.E. from Tennessee Tech University, an M.S. and a Ph.D. in E.E. from Virginia Tech University, and an M.B.A. from Morehead State University.Dr. Renee M. Clark, University of Pittsburgh Renee M. Clark is a research assistant professor of Industrial Engineering and Director of Assessment in the Swanson School of Engineering and the Engineering Education Research Center (EERC). She received her MS in Mechanical Engineering from Case Western and her PhD in Industrial Engineering from the University of Pittsburgh while working for Delphi Automotive. Her research interests focus on the propagation and assessment of active and experiential learning in
University: The mission of Stanford University’s d school (for design school) or, more formally, the Hasso Plattner Institute of Design, is to enable students to be creative. Graduate students from all of Stanford divisions take courses. “Multi-disciplinary pools of teachers then immerse them in a system of innovative thinking, with specific goals for solving practical problems.”43 Key d school elements include a highly-flexible physical environment, interdisciplinary teams, and emphasis on constructing prototypes, as crude as they may be, in keeping with the “build to think” philosophy. According to David Kelley, the d school’s founder and leader, products created by the six-year old institute have
research aims to assess the program’s impact on student learning, criticalthinking, and the development of a sustainability mindset. By combining quantitative andqualitative data collection methods, such as surveys, interviews, and project assessments, theresearch will provide a comprehensive understanding of the LASC’s strengths and weaknesses.The findings will not only inform the continuous improvement of the curriculum but alsoprovide valuable insights for other institutions seeking to integrate climate change andsustainability principles into their engineering programs. This iterative approach ensures thatthe LASC evolves to effectively prepare graduates to become not only proficient engineers butalso responsible professionals who are equipped
Paper ID #45468From essential to ridiculous: Exploring instructor perceptions of empathy-focusedinstructionJennifer Howcroft, University of Waterloo Jennifer Howcroft is a Continuing Lecturer in the Department of Systems Design Engineering at the University of Waterloo. Her pedagogical research focuses on engineering design, holistic engineering education, stakeholder interactions, and empathy in engineering education.Dr. Kate Mercer, University of Waterloo Dr. Kate Mercer graduated with a Master of Information from the University of Toronto, and a PhD in Pharmacy from the University of Waterloo, focusing on
State University, University of Ontario Institute of Technology, andSonoma State University9,10,11,12 were investigated. Although more advanced than our needs,graduate programs such as that at Wayne State University7 were also surveyed. Many of theseprograms offered technician certification or emphasized alternative energy. In response to thetribal college desires, we designed a six-course curriculum with coverage of both alternative andtraditional energy sources as well as skill sets (general mathematics, general science, andtopographic surveying) that the unique set of tribal students need.The first course requested by the Tribal colleges was a land surveying course, as there was animmediate need for mapping of tribal lands and resources and
and therefore is potentially very useful in careers of the students post graduation. Specific lab activities were developed to help students learn the program. In the firstthree years of the curriculum development (2013 - 2015), an introductory SW lab utilizedtutorials native to SW. Students completed the tutorials in a computer lab with help from theinstructors and teaching assistants (TAs), and then they practiced their new skills by creating apart according to the information provided in an ASTM standard. In 2016, a new SWIntroductory Lab was developed specially to teach the student the key tools and features that theyneed for labs and the design project. The students were also instructed to learn on their own withresources such as
from the sites helps to build a robust andeffective learning environment that an individual instructor would struggle to create on theirown.The success of the PREP program in attracting students to STEM disciplines (99% of PREPstudents attend college) and preparing them for the rigor of those disciplines (45% of PREPcollege graduates majored in STEM) is due in part to the integration of engineering designprojects with classroom learning. Each year students participate in a yearlong engineeringdesign project that culminates in the summer program and in smaller weekly design projectsduring the seven week summer program. The integration of the projects with the course learningmotivates and engages students and helps them see the relevance of the
U.S. One common theme of the responses was that there wasconsiderable interest in including failure case studies in courses, and that there was a lack ofavailable materials suitable for classroom use. 16,19 As a result, considerable effort has been putby TCFE into developing case study materials suitable for classroom use.The use of case studies is also supported by the latest pedagogical research. From Analysis toAction 19refers on page 2 that textbooks lacking in practical examples is an emerging weakness.This source refers specifically to breadth of understanding, which may be achieved through casestudies. Another issue addressed 19 (p. 19) is the need to “incorporate historical, social, andethical issues into courses for engineering
discipline, it focuses on the tools, processes, and methods needed to design,implement and test complete systems, and to adapt existing systems as their environmentevolves. This academic program combines the engineering management area with the field ofsecurity and safety. This curriculum identifies the common fundamentals and practices thatdefine the theory and effective practice of asset and people protection, and it communicatesthese principles through a sound academic forum. The highlights of the program includeproblem identification, assessment, risk reduction and control engineering. Graduates areacademically prepared to appear for both the Certified Safety Professional (CSP) certificationadministered by the American Society of Safety
Kris Jaeger, PhD has been a member of Northeastern University’s Gateway Team, a selected group of full-time faculty expressly devoted to the First-year Engineering Program at Northeastern Uni- versity. Recently, she has joined the expanding Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering at NU to continue teaching Simulation, Facilities Planning, Human-Machine Systems, and Senior Capstone Design. Dr. Jaeger has been the recipient of several honors in engineering education for both teaching and mentoring and has been involved in several award-wining engineering educational research initiatives through ASEE and beyonDr. Richard Whalen, Northeastern University
Paper ID #43351A Novel Laboratory-Scale Pilot Plant StudyDr. Robert P. Hesketh, Rowan University Robert Hesketh is a Professor of Chemical Engineering at Rowan University. He received his B.S. in 1982 from the University of Illinois and his Ph.D. from the University of Delaware in 1987. After his Ph.D. he conducted research at the University of Cambridge. Dr. Hesketh has demonstrated an enthusiasm for engineering education and has contributed to the improvement of engineering education in many ways. Robert is a highly motivated professor in both undergraduate and graduate education and has received 12 education and 2
impact of advising interventions on the academicsuccess of engineering and applied science pre-majors at a large, multicultural, top-tier researchuniversity. There is a growing body of literature addressing the impact of specific academicinitiatives with respect to how higher education students are taught math, science, andengineering subjects, though there is less focus on the value of intensive psycho-social supporton the retention and advancement of students pursuing the science, technology, engineering andmath (STEM) disciplines. This paper seeks to address that issue and illustrate how earlyadvising interventions can improve retention and graduation rates.Kitzrow notes that colleges and universities in the United States have seen enormous