optimise natural structures and synthetic properties. The hoof work I have just completed has involved quite a complex microscopic analysis, but it has allowed for creativity. No-one has explored the structure of cow-hoof the way we have, and it could be any way we feel it might be. We have submitted a beautiful 3D drawing of what we think it looks like at a microscopic level. I have discovered the aesthetic beauty of my work and now I can own it.Cynthia now specialises in environmental management and decision making, cleantechnology, and the practicalities of low energy, resource recovery options for wastetreatment, incorporating the social and ethical dimensions of these issues. For me, the crux is about
judgements, and time management; 3) a solid foundation in personal and interpersonal attributes and ethics, and 4) an involvement with engineering practice as the formal education evolves.Other significant forces influence educational objectives besides those cited above. Civilengineering departments, as they set their educational program objectives, in general feel directlythe influence, advice and opinions of their local industry advisory committees and of employersof the program graduates. These people are, in the view of most educators, our “customers.”Nonetheless, it may be correct to assume, from anecdotal and “grass-roots” communication, thatthe beliefs of local industry leaders and employers -- our customers -- are entirely
the ethical use of AI. Additionally, faculty hiring trends in STEMfields have brought in faculty who have access to and experience in using “toolboxes” such as AI,machine learning, data science and cybersecurity to enhance their research. Furthermore, to helpcontextualize academic research needs at comprehensive institutions, many university libraries areadding faculty positions with specific aims including data science, copyright / intellectual property;virtual / extended reality and AI / emerging technologies to support research in critical areas suchas autonomy, advanced materials, big data, cultural geography, linguistics, discovery and digitalhumanities.Aside from formulation of the algorithms behind LLM’s [1], a great deal of dialogue
1 2% 1 2% 1 3% 1 2% Funding 26 52% 21 46% 19 51% 19 46% Language 1 2% 1 2% 1 3% 2 5% Low Study Participation 8 16% 8 17% 8 22% 8 20% Publishing Challenges 6 12% 5 11% 4 11% 5 12% Research Ethics Approval 8 16% 8 17% 4 11% 6 15% Research Interest 7 14% 7 15% 4 11% 7 17% Lack of Admin Training in CER 12 24% 12 26% 11 30% 11 27% Social-Familial Influences 4 8% 3 7% 3 8
#6 / #10 (differentiating memorization from understanding), #9 / #125 Pseudonyms are used for privacy and ethical concerns.(metacognitive awareness), and #10 / #13 (course performance) reinforce the model’s role inpromoting an integrated learning experience. Specifically, the correlation between items #6 and #10in both pretest and posttest phases suggests that students’ self-perceived learning skills align withtheir ability to distinguish between rote memorization and genuine understanding—a central goalof the LHETM approach.The positive correlations between item pairs #6 / #13 ( = 0.579, p = 0.012) and #7 / #13 ( = 0.542,p = 0.020) in the pretest phase alone reveal an intriguing predictive relationship: students’ initialconfidence in
systems, components, or processes to meet practical or applied needs; (4)understanding computer hardware and systems; (5) working on a multidisciplinary team; and (6)making ethical decisions in engineering/research. These results are presented in Table 2 withstatistically significant results marked with a double asterisk (**).Table 2. Pre- and post-survey comparisons on knowledge/skills ratings (N = 10). Note: Eachitem was rated on a four-point scale (1 = no knowledge or skills; 2 = low knowledge or skills; 3= working knowledge or skills; 4 = advanced knowledge or skills). Item Pre-Test Pre-Test Post- Post- Z p Mean Range Test Test
in higher education: An application of the SWOT framework,” Review of Educational Research, p. 84,112-159, 2014.[19] P. C. Abrami, “Improving judgements about teaching effectiveness using teacher rating forms,” New Directions for Institutional Research, vol. 109, pp. 59–87, 2001.[20] R. A. Arreola, “Developing a comprehensive faculty evaluation system.” 2007.[21] R. J. Kreitzer and J. Sweet-Cushman, “Evaluating student evaluations of teaching: A review of measurement and equity bias in SETs and recommendations for ethical reform,” Journal of Academic Ethics. Advance online publication, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s10805-021-09400-w.[22] A. R. Linse, “Interpreting and using student ratings data: Guidance for faculty serving as
Additional industry engagement Resources for instructors for student guidance Teachers collaborating and learning from each other Encouragement for faculty to increase interaction with students A core set of learning outcomes with scope for faculty to add major specific materials From a Student Perspective:Community building and sharing activities/opportunitiesSupport of major explorationExposure to technical writing and professionalismMore design-based/problem-based learning activitiesTraining on life skills – economics, physical safetyAddition of DEI, Ethics, and sustainability topics Table 4. Non-Student Stakeholder Survey Qualitative Responses Regarding FYS Credit
barriers to successful implementation of a liaison effort are related to personalities andeducational backgrounds of Chinese librarians. Zeng [8] summarizes the qualities required to bea liaison librarian as information literacy skills, solid background in one or more disciplines,marketing and public relations skills, ethics and life-time learning capabilities. Many Chineselibrarians chose this job because they expected to mainly handle books instead of people. Astheir personalities generally tend to be quiet, outreach- as a main requirement for a liaisonlibrarian- can be very challenging. Educational background is another issue in China. Differentfrom the United States, China offers Library and Information Science (LIS) degrees at
ethics study(including preparation of a code of ethics by students), and preparation of a complete project reportthat contains all design drawings and calculations. This course also involve leadership and oral andwriting components as part of their learning objectives.The student performance in courses involving laboratory also includes evaluation of laboratory reportsrequired from students. Grading of laboratory reports is rigorous and involves evaluation of technicalcontents, clarity and coherence of presented materials, and writing skills.Most of the architectural engineering senior level courses also involve projects. In addition to homeworkproblems, exams, etc. the student evaluation in these courses is also achieved through review of
grades received for the firstattempt at a given course (A = 4, B = 3, C = 2, D = 1, F = 0), with Withdrawals treated asmissing data. Page 22.1428.6Table 2. ABET Program Outcomes Criteria ABET CriteriaHard Skills3a: an ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering3b: an ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data3c: an ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability3e: an
not sure unknowledgeable unknowledgeable 1. Name, describe or use environmental engineering definitions and definitions for 58.33% 41.67% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% sustainability 2. Name, describe or use environmental engineering 58.33% 41.67% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% concepts 3. Name, describe or use environmental nomenclature for 25.00% 41.67% 33.33% 0.00% 0.00% calculations 4. Ability to identify, formulate, and solve environmental mass 75.00% 25.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% balances 5. Understanding professional and ethical responsibility in 75.00
have complete confidence in my ability to solve engineering problems.I have complete confidence in my knowledge and application of ethical standards in engineering.I have complete confidence in my ability to communicate effectively.I have complete confidence in my ability to put engineering problems in a broader societal Page 22.549.16context.I have complete confidence in my ability to continue learning technical concepts outside theclassroom.I have complete confidence in my awareness and understanding of contemporary issues and howthey affect my career.I have complete confidence in my ability to use techniques, skills, and tools related
professional issues, including teamwork, ethics, communication, and leadership. Specificcourse-related topics, such as spatial analysis or localized topics within a field, also emerged insmall numbers (though some of these issues were themselves tied to students’ success insubsequent courses). A small number of studies focused on comparing teaching approaches toidentify approaches that lead to higher learning gains.Methods: How are we conducting assessments?With respect to the methods used to conduct assessment, surveys dominated the literaturereviewed, with more than half of the papers reporting survey data. Most surveys addressed issuesrelated to student satisfaction and attitude, though many also included self-reported learninggains. In addition
aspirations.In developing what is currently known as Engineering Criteria 2000, ABET reaffirmed a set of"hard" engineering skills, while introducing a second, equally important, set of six "professional"skills. These latter skills include communication, teamwork, and understanding ethics andprofessionalism, which are designated as process skills; and engineering within a global andsocietal context, lifelong learning, and knowledge of contemporary issues, which are designatedas awareness skills3. While it is traditionally easy to measure and evaluate hard skills throughmathematics, science, technology, and engineering courses, assessment of soft-skills poses somechallenges to engineering educators. In this paper, we present our experience in
engineering education.Christy Moore, University of Texas, Austin Christy Moore is a Senior Lecturer in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Texas at Austin where she has taught in Engineering Communication since 1993. Ms. Moore’s current research is focused on ways of expanding the undergraduate engineering curriculum to better incorporate study of communication skills, global responsibility, and engineering ethics. Since 2004, Ms. Moore has developed curriculum for and taught a First-year Seminar that addresses the impact of technology on society and the environment. Page 22.332.1
done.As a capstone design course, several important ABET14 requirements are covered in the course.Table 2 listed the outcomes assessed.Table 2 - Abet outcomes achieved though the capstone design course in Facilities Planningan Design (c) an ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability (d) an ability to function on multidisciplinary teams (e) an ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems (f) an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility (g) an ability to communicate effectively (k) an ability to
human impact of design and its products at the center of the deliberations. “How might it have been designed otherwise?” is a question about the human consequences of human invention, a consideration of engineering design as a social and humanistic field as well as a technical and scientific one2.This move is partly due to ABET‟s accreditation requirements now including language stressingthe importance of engineers working within social constraints, such as the environmental, social, Page 22.444.2political, and ethical situations of their designs. And ABET goes further still, requiring studentsbecome capable of
laboratory in topics such as profile of the engineering profession andeducation, systems of units, data presentation and graphing, ethics, and problem solving usingcommon engineering concepts.A description of one of these challenges is presented next to demonstrate the challengedevelopment and implementation process, the developed instructive materials, assessment tools(pre-test and post test), and the preliminary results that were obtained in the implementation ofthe challenges. Similar instruction and assessment tools were developed for each of the otherchallenges in Figure 2. Page 22.471.6 Introduction to ME Objectives M1 M2
class participation. Typical literary “homework sets” this past semester were finding ten examples of irony in Oedipus Rex and briefly explain why/how each is ironic, rewriting Book 1.1 of Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics in their own words and using their own examples, as well as exploring interpretive problems such as what does the Grand Inquisitor mean when he says, “But I awakened and would not serve madness.” • On the whole, they are very intelligent. • They are very practical in the way they think and the way they learn. They are used to Page 2.393.6 doing homework
instructional models without fully discarding them. Though this subjectwas designated to be delivered as a Problem-Based Learning (PBL) subject, the educationalapproach taken was such that the PBL delivery was only a part of a pedagogical toolbox. Themain educational thrust was one of inductive learning and teaching derived from courses suchas creative arts. Aside from PBL, the inductive teaching approach incorporated Case-Based(CBL) and Enquiry- Based learning (EBL) which provided the appropriate pedagogicalscaffolding for knowledge integration. Material technological sciences, manufacturingengineering, engineering design, issues of ethics, sustainability and environment were weavedtogether. Such educational approach was necessary if strictly academic
laboratory groups10. Perform experiments in a disciplinary manner using standard electrical laboratory instruments.11. Communicate effectively through the submission of professional technical reports12. Investigate a given topic in technology and discuss societal and ethical considerations13. Understand and have a commitment to quality, timeless, and continuous improvement14. Draft and simulate the operation of electric circuits using MultiSim15. Present a technology topic effectively in front of an audience Table 1- Course Learning Objectives Electrical Devices and Measurements Course Content • Science of Electricity and Electronics- The Nature of Matter, Static Electricity • Basic
meet desired needs. It is a decision-making process (often iterative), inwhich the basic sciences, mathematics, and the engineering sciences are applied to convertresources optimally to meet these stated needs.”More specifically, general criterion 3 (c) states that, “Engineering programs must demonstratethat their graduates have...an ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desiredneeds within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical,health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability,” and hence design is essential topreparing civil engineers. Below we will describe in more detail the evolution of the capstonedesign class.I – CREATION (1994-2004)A new department-wide capstone
Civil Engineers, 2009.11. “NSPE Code of Ethics,” National Society of Professional Engineers, accessed January 1 2011, http://www.nspe.org/Ethics/CodeofEthics/index.html12. Prince, Michael, “Does Active Learning Work? A Review of the Research,” Journal of Engineering Education 93 (2004): 223-23113. Riley, Donna, Engineering and Social Justice. Synthesis Lectures on Engineers, Technology, and Society: Morgan and Claypool Publishers, 2008. Page 22.12.19
manner. 5. Ability to use modern computer tools in engineering. 6. Ability to communicate in written, oral, and graphical forms. 7. Ability to work in teams and apply interpersonal skills in engineering contexts. 8. Ability and desire to lay a foundation for continued learning beyond the bachelors’ degree. 9. Awareness of professional issues in engineering practice, including ethical responsibility, safety, the creative enterprise, and loyalty and commitment to the profession. 10. Awareness of contemporary issues in engineering practice, including economic, social, political, and environmental issues and global impactAbility to work in teams appeared to be the most significant skill SEI participants developedafter
presented below.Core Foundation Courses 27.0ET 605 Modern Materials 3.0ET 610 Networks for Industrial Environment 3.0ET 615 Rapid Prototyping 3.0ET 619 Programmable Devices and Systems 3.0ET 620 Microsystems and Microfabrication 3.0ET 725 Sensors and Measurements 3.0ET 732 Modern Energy Conversion Technologies 3.0PRST 503 Ethics for Professionals
. X X X X X X Problems Com- X X X X X X munication Lifelong X X X X X X Learning Ethical & X X X Social Resp. Diversity, X X X
research Page 15.1080.3involves the following active areas of expanding the utility of MEAs: development of studentreflection tools; implementation of learning technologies; detection and repair ofmisconceptions; development of engineering students’ ethical frameworks; and development ofadvanced curriculum (Hamilton, Lesh, Lester, & Brilleslyper, 2008).An MEA has to be carefully constructed on six design principles that assure the MEA willprovide the student and instructor with the learning experience desired. The MEA frameworkpresents opportunities to address the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology(ABET) criteria, especially the
contribute to the design process.5. Have demonstrated the ability to function effectively on multi-disciplinary teams and be a successful leader.6. Have demonstrated the ability to identify, analyze and solve technical problems.7. Have demonstrated the ability to communicate effectively.8. Have demonstrated continuous professional and technical growth, with practical experience, so as to be licensed in their field or achieve that level of expertise, as applicable.9. Be capable of addressing issues of ethics, safety, professionalism, cultural diversity, globalization, environmental impact, and social and economic impact in professional practice
course that has been conceived to do the following: (1) Give students a real-world, design office design experience tackling an open- ended design scenario that encompasses high level Bloom’s2 cognitive thinking across seven CE sub-disciplines (2) Ensure students wrestle with professional issues such as communication with engineers, policy makers and the public (3) Ensure students are faced with issues associated with typical design constraints such as regulatory, economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and Page 15.260.3 safety, constructability, and sustainability