students from different majors to interact and communicate with each other.Students were strongly encouraged to seek advice from peer students for assignments that werenot in their fields.Nine assignments were given in the first eight weeks of the semester and accounted for 40% ofthe final grade. Student grade information on these assignments is given below in Table 1. Theaverage score in all areas is above 80%. Table 1: Student grades on individual homework assignments Homework Area Average Minimum Maximum grade % grade % grade % Robotics 82.6 20 100 Algorithms and data
Requirement for GraduationIntroductionProfessional internships are not a new concept to college and university programs.However, to require this experience in the form of a demanding, well designed andimplemented internship is a very time consuming investment, which will yield excellentreturns for your students and for your program. Students, both traditional and non-traditional, are given an opportunity to demonstrate, advance, and refine technical andsupervisory competencies learned in the classroom and in the laboratories. Graduateswith this type of resume-worthy experience have a substantial advantage over peers withno internship experience. “Once, having an internship or two on your resume made you areal standout in the marketplace. Today
production comes down, LH2 becomes an evermore attractive option. As planned there, the concept exploration results from last year havebecome the starting point for this year’s course assignments. The gaps in learning seen last yearare being addressed this year.The new paper for 2011 extends prior work through a second cycle of iteration, bringing in theexperiences of developing a paper for professional peer review, presenting to visiting technicalexperts from industry, and hopefully, presenting to the airline industry in 2011. It also discussesthe experience from a current experiment to close the iterative cycle of improvement: refiningthe undergraduate high speed aerodynamics course, incorporating the lessons and capabilitieslearned from the
. F. (2000). Developing Critical Writing Skills in Engineering and Technology Students. Journal of Engineering Education, 89, 409-412 and 504-505. 15. Anewalt, K. (2005). Using Peer Review as a Vehicle for Communication Skill Development and Active Learning. Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, 21, 155. 16. Hackman, J.R. (1983). A Normative Model of Work Team Effectiveness. Office of Naval Research. Interim Report. A893631. 17. Hackman, J. R.. (1980). Work Redesign and Motivation. Professional Psychology, 11, 445-455. 18. Wageman, R., Hackman, J.R., Lehman, E. (2005). Team Diagnostic Survey: Development of an Instrument. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 41, 373. 19. Shuman, L
to develop these outcomes the Engineering Technology faculty at MU had to complete acareful analysis of each required course in the curriculum as well as the technical electives. Themodel suggested by Angelo was used in this process21. The model is based on four basicpreconditions: shared trust, shared vision and goals, shared language and concepts, and sharedguidelines22. Shared trust is one of the most important preconditions needed for a meaningfulanalysis of the curriculum and to identify outcomes that will be high quality assessmentindicators. Angelo points out that in order for trust to occur the “participants need to feelrespected, valued, safe, and in the company of worthy peers”23. To facilitate this approach, theEngineering
Page 20.18.2 Indonesia the Netherlands the United States.We even have taught handful of students while they were at sea, either in the merchant marineor in the Royal Australian Navy.In our experience, isolation, lack of real-time contact with teaching staff, and lack of access tolaboratories are some of the most significant challenges faced by these students, leading to highdrop-out rates among on-line students.7 Educational challenges faced by their lecturers includedifficulty teaching teamwork skills, ensuring effective group work among students,implementing cooperative and peer-based learning, supervising projects, and enabling thestudents to give in-class presentations. Laboratory work is
final section was an open opportunity for participants to write any comment,thought, or idea they had after the session.Our inaugural session in 2011 was titled, “Preparing for Global Leadership: CulturalCompetence and Connections with and for International Students and Colleagues.” The panelincluded students and faculty from STEM fields across campus, with representation from thefollowing countries: Argentina, Italy, Canada, Haiti, West Africa, Mexico, China, India, andGermany. They shared experiences and answered questions regarding the following topics:• What does it mean to be culturally competent?• How does cultural competence play a part in mentoring students or relationships withprofessors in graduate school?• How can we promote cultural
Behavioral Control Figure 1: Model of the Theory of Planned Behavior10Intention is what one has in mind to do or bring about, and is considered the immediatepredecessor of behavior10. A person must intend to engage in a behavior before they can engagein a behavior. Factors such as their intensity, attitude, subjective norm, and perceived ability mayhave mediating affects on intention. Simply put, if a person believes they are capable ofbehaving in a certain manner, believes that the rewards of behaving in that manner areworthwhile and beneficial, and has the support of their peers, family and friends, they will intendto engage in the behavior.Behavior, then, is the observable response in a given
students to obtain financial aid through scholarships, grants, and loans, and she also meets with each CSEMS student throughout each semester. The Financial Aid Office compiles focus reports listing students by major, GPA, sex, race, etc. who qualify for federal financial aid. Page 10.1347.5 Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright @ 2005, American Society for Engineering Education The Educational Psychologist/Researcher is a member of the faculty of the College of Engineering and Director of the Writing Lab Center, and
definition, and presentation in a suitable learning format andpace. This phase also allows the developers to focus on the selection of the best course material,lab and homework exercises, and presentation methods in the traditional lecture format. In the second phase, the focus shifts to distance learning strategies, iterative refinement of thecourses, and collaboration with other peer institutions. All lectures will be provided via I2, butleft available on the class website for later or repeated viewing by students. An additional goal ofthis phase is to begin incorporating the additional research developments into the courses. This isdone through a variety of methods including, but not limited to: a) having students in the classreview recent
provide the teaching materials fortheir students in addition to examination and certification, distance education has become a truealternative to conventional education, particularly for those who did not make it intoconventional universities. A measure of the success of the distance experiment is that there are asmany students enrolled at the Open University of Sri Lanka as in all the Sri Lankan conventionaluniversities put together.However, the distance option still suffers from problems. There is a high failure rate because ofdiminished peer interaction, lack of full time commitment and other reasons. But the problem ismost severe in engineering and (to a lesser extent) in the physical sciences where sometimesthere are more academic staff
discussionsof the intersection between DEIJ and civil engineering projects [18] or the importance of DEIJin engineering as a whole through guest lectures and modules introduced at the beginning of acourse [19]; adopting liberatory pedagogical practices [20] or inclusive pedagogical practices[21] in the classroom; professional development for engineering faculty on DEIJ topics [22],[23]; placing greater significance on equity issues in relation to student admissions and facultyrecruitment [22]; encouraging students to engage with DEIJ concepts beyond their ownexperiences [24]; and developing co-curricular or peer mentor groups to foster student support,particularly for racially minoritized students in engineering [20] - [22]. In their study ofstudent
strong foundation in thermal-fluid disciplines.Table 1: Sample laboratory sequence for the Internal Combustion Engine course offered atWMU as part of the Mechanical Engineering curriculum. CFR: collaborative fuel research. Lab Title Topics Hardware Technical writing, report structure, Laboratory Safety and Report 0 data processing and visualization Preparation Instructions techniques Analysis of Brake Performance Torque-work-power relationships Chassis 1 Parameters Friction and
” (Figure 4) on two actual design projects. Students were organizedinto multidisciplinary teams of three to four members; the group had a total of thirty-eightstudents (15 male). The “Concepts” section uses quizzes given in nearly every session toascertain whether students have understood the material in their pre-class reading assignments.In addition, we encourage students to write brief reflective journal entries to further solidify andreinforce their own understanding, as well as demonstrate that improved understanding for animproved quiz grade. Universidad de las Américas Puebla’s Chemical, Environmental, and Foodengineering students have in the studied course a great opportunity for a multidisciplinarycollaborative experience
ProcessThe literature of capstone TDR describes variations on a generally applied industry approachusing TDRs associated with design gates or phases as described above. Industry approaches aredescribed in various standards (e.g., IEEE Std. 1028-1997) appropriate for the designapplication. The TDR process is a peer evaluation of a design as it is developed and/or before itis deployed for development, fabrication or production. Peer reviewers are acquired fromindependent pools in order to provide experienced, unbiased, and objective design oversight19. Similar to spaced TDRs in industry, Wilson, Cambron, and McIntyre20 describe a capstoneTDR process that requires reviews throughout the year where students are used as independentreviewers (see also, 4
Page 24.1332.3learning7-11. Scaffolding12 was suggested as a strategy to help students through difficulties withimportant aspects of the domain that seem easy or obvious to “experts” like the instructor. Keyscaffolding strategies include breaking a large task into smaller parts, working in peer groups and prompting13-16; as students gain confidence and competency in a topic, the instructor removes thescaffolding. The efficacy of scaffolding combined with team-based learning principles isinvestigated in several studies9-11, 16 17. Employing the use of computing tools (such as spreadsheets, MATLAB or MathCAD) toillustrate key course concepts is
interviews were transcribed andanalyzed using open-coding procedures to identify ways women experience the relationshipbetween their gender and their engineering identities, their experiences with male students (e.g.on design teams, studying for exams, completing homework assignments), and their strategiesfor navigating gendered dynamics such as peers who did not value their input or who expectedthem to take on certain roles. The participants rarely responded directly to questions aboutperceived gendered experiences, but when talking about their experiences in classes or on teams,did describe ways in which they had negotiated their space and their identity, earning respect ordemonstrating competence to gain a voice at the table. At the same time
the information is presented seems valuable.” “Posted lectures with comment great for review and homework, but trying to listen to them before class was overwhelming. Good tool but I prefer in-class lectures.”Instructor PerspectiveFrom an instructor perspective, making the lectures in advance took time and the resulting fileswere very large. Creating additional problems for in-class work also took additional time.However, I found it more enjoyable to spend class time interactively working problems. Peer-to-peer instruction was observed. Students questions while
cannot wait for every student to finish, but if you constantlycut them short, they will not participate in the activity and instead will wait for you to answer theproblem for them. Also, immediately after the activity, relevant discussion or sharing of studentwork is necessary to retain engaged students. In the observations, without a planned follow-upfor each active learning exercise, students who were off-task and then engaged in the activeexercise were often observed returning to their off-task work. Likewise, students who finishedan activity before their peers would participate in off-task activities, but a powerful summary ordiscussion of the exercise would often reengage those students in lecture.To illustrate the benefits to active
satellite campus can demonstrate their potential ofeventually becoming a traditional big University campus, by ensuring that their students arereceiving high-quality education and are performing at the same level as their peers at the big-University campus.Popularity of Satellite CampusThe plan to establish a satellite campus and incur eventual growth is largely dependent on theeconomic strengths of the region in which they are located. The current popularity of highereducation leads to having easily accessible locations that can attract a broad spectrum of highlyqualified faculty, efficient staff members, and enthusiastic students. The appropriate curricularoptions, majors, etc. of the satellite campus is determined based on the specialized
Paper ID #41324Professional Skills to Support Interdisciplinary Work: Lessons Learned froma Successful Collaboration between Universities, Training Programs, and ProfessionalSocietiesDr. Katy Luchini-Colbry, Michigan State University Katy Luchini-Colbry is the Assistant Dean for Graduate Student Services at the College of Engineering at Michigan State University, where she completed degrees in political theory and computer science. A recipient of a NSF Graduate Research Fellowship, she earned Ph.D. and M.S.E. in computer science and engineering from the University of Michigan. She has published dozens of peer-reviewed works
consisted of four separate self-contained chapters covering the fourdifferent major tasks, where range and operating cost calculations were combined as the fourth task.Each chapter consisted of an explanation of the task objective, technical approach used, results intabular and graphical form, discussion, and summary. In order to encourage students to be succinctin their writing, a maximum page length limit of five pages per task, including tables and figures,while using 12 point font text and 1" margins was imposed. Students were warned about the needto include properly labeled table headers and graph axes labels including appropriate dimensionalunits. In the results discussion, emphasis was placed on explaining the technical behavior rather
,generally a PhD in Engineering, and a teaching fellow, generally a high school science teacher, closelywork with students to pedagogically inculcate basics of core engineering disciplines such as civil,mechanical, electrical, materials, and chemical engineering. EI values independent problem-solving skillsand simultaneously promotes team spirit among students. A number of crucial engineering aspects suchas professional ethics, communication, technical writing, and understanding of common engineeringprinciples are instilled in high school students via well-designed individual and group activities. Thispaper discusses the model of the EI program and its impact on students learning and their preparation forthe engineering career.Introduction: Shortage
andsensors. Emphasizing conceptual questions in assessments, Victor leverages smart classrooms forcollaborative learning and actively participates in peer observation programs for continuousimprovement.While implementing EBIPs, Victor encountered challenges specific to the Foundations ofEngineering Lab. Communication issues among students engaged in semester-long projects, likeconstructing a robot, resulted in significant hurdles, including a lack of commitment, latesubmissions, and teams falling apart. “We’re focused on a project, and we have first-year studentsthat have different skills… and commitments. Some students are more committed than others. Ihave senior students crying because they feel that the group is not responding as they want
taught Industrial Design for over 29 years at various institutions: Rhode Island School of Design, Ohio University, The Art Institute of Pittsburgh, The Art Institute of Colorado, Pratt Institute, Parsons School of Design, and the Istituto Europeo di Design in Madrid, Spain. He has practiced product design and exhibit design in New York City, Denver and Madrid, Spain, and has helped write a patent and developed concepts for Colgate Palmolive among other companies. He has written two books, Perspective Sketching and Hybrid Drawing Techniques for Interior Design. Hi area of specialty is concept drawing for product design, digital rendering, design thinking, and product development.Jake Scoggin, University of
deficit views of communities, bring a savior complex to their work, and/or are overly focused on student learning. CES: CE that takes “a scholarly approach”, which means being grounded in previous work and “documented through products that can be disseminated and subjected to critique by peers from a variety of contexts”; a goal of CES is “to generate, disseminate, and apply new knowledge.” Further, “Effective CES demands that the scholar produce diverse forms of scholarship in innovative formats—such as documentaries, websites, briefs, or manuals—for non-academic audiences and uses.” [13, p. 59] “CES is recognized as teaching, discovery, integration, application and engagement that involves the faculty member in a mutually
student discussion when rating students’ discussions. During the in-class implantation, all data wasThis method is flexible, easy to implement, and can be used at collected as the discussions took place, with the assessorsthe course level for teaching and measuring engineering writing tally marks and notes directly on the relevant portionprofessional skills and the program level at the end of a of the EPSA Rubric.curricular sequence for evaluating a program’s efficacy
the expected deliverables. Upon completing the experiments,students were asked to submit a comprehensive lab report summarizing their methodology, dataanalysis, and conclusions. The report required them to not only present their experimental resultsbut also critically evaluate their findings in relation to theoretical predictions, providing insightsinto the real-world implications of pipeline design. This process fostered a deeper understandingof fluid flow in practical systems and reinforced the importance of clear communication, both interms of technical writing and in presenting complex scientific findings to peers and instructors.The handout given to the students is included as Appendix 1 for reference.Two lab sessions were dedicated to
, Bioinformatics, Dentistry, Dental Informatics programs at various public and private universities with more than 15 years of administrative experience as a chair/program director and 25 years of teaching, research, service, and industrial experiences.Husnu Saner Narman, Marshall University Dr. Husnu S. Narman is an Associate Professor in the Department of Computer Sciences and Electrical Engineering at Marshall University. Previously a post-doctoral fellow at Clemson University, his research interests include distributed computing, cyber-physical systems, machine learning applications, social networks, and advanced learning technologies. He has secured around $3.5 million in funding as PI or Co-PI and has over 60 peer
curriculum leader was able to use the collaboration time to help teachers envision how sciencecould be integrated with other aspects of the curriculum such as reading and writing. Four of theprincipals described their role as a facilitator or encouraging force in terms of professional development.For example, Principal 2 (P2) indicated, “I am more of a facilitator (guide on the side) than the person Page 24.1376.7doing the staff development.” Money and time were mentioned as issues by half of the principals; theprofessional development days in this district were at an all-time low as a result of budget cuts. Twoprincipals expressed a need for