X(s) 0.8s + 400 = 2 . Y (s) s + 0.8s + 400 The response of this system should not exceed an amplitude of 4. Will it remain within this specification when it experiences an input of y(t) = 10 sin (30t)?B) Sensitive electronics used to control an automobile engine are to be housed inside an engine compartment as shown in the figure below. The electronics need to be isolated from the motion of the car body to protect them from damage and fatigue. Thus, the module is mounted on an isolator. Please answer The transfer the following function questions
: Describe what IoT is and how it works today CO_2: Design and program IoT devices CO_3: Examine the security and privacy challenges of IoT CO_4: Find proper security/privacy solutions for IoTThe course meets twice each week for fourteen weeks. The duration of each meeting is eightyminutes (one hour and twenty minutes). Table 1 identifies the topical theme, the laboratoryexperiment(s), and project(s) associated with each theme and the session number(s). Table 1: IoT course outline Theme Laboratory Experiment/Project Session #(s) Course overview: IoT technology and impact Arduino microcontroller 1-3
temperature response for the two fluids which areinvolved in the process. Moreover, the response of the system is analyzed in real-time with the useof MATLAB® and Simulink® software, including the Simulink S-Function block. This block isused to generate real-time solutions for nonlinear systems which can be modified and updated bythe user as the simulation is being conducted, similar to a physical system.The virtual crossflow heat exchanger simulation software incorporates three MATLAB ® scriptsincluding an initialization script, a calculation script, and an S-Function script, in addition to aSimulink® data file containing the user interface and the block diagram of the system. As shownin Figure 2, the simulation sequence is performed beginning with
degrees, either completing multiple degrees atHBCUs or only attaining their undergraduate degree at an HBCU before attending a differenttype of institution for graduate studies. As Crewe [3] further notes, depending on the institutionthat awarded the graduate degree(s), recognition of success may be framed around the alumni’snon-HBCU campus environments rather than how one’s undergraduate HBCU campusexperiences helped lay the foundation for academic achievement. Such narratives areproblematic and speak to the need to further highlight the critical and supportive role HBCUsplay in producing Black STEM professionals. Additionally, there remains a critical gap in theliterature that details the graduate school decision-making process for HBCU
78 Urban Geography Match 2 Mentee Black Male 36 Mechanical Engineering Mentor White Male 69 Mechanical Engineering Match 3 Mentee Black Male 38 Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering Mentor White Male 74 Biomedical, Chemical, and Biomolecular Engineering Match 4 Mentee Black Male 31 Mechanical Engineering Mentor White Male 84 Mechanical Engineering Match 5 Mentee Black Male 35 Mechanical Engineering Mentor S. Asian Male 73 Mechanical Engineering Match 6 Mentee Black Male 54 Manufacturing Engineering Technology Mentor White Male 76 Manufacturing
Deep Learning and cloud computing. ● The GPSS team from the World Bank, for providing access to the data sets, expertise in architecture and community outreach, and assistance with the documentation of the overall projects.ReferencesAbadi, M., Barham, P., Chen, J., Chen, Z., Davis, A., Dean, J., Devin, M., Ghemawat, S., Irving, G., Isard, M., Kudlur, M., Levenberg, J., Monga, R., Moore, S., Murray, D. G., Steiner, B., Tucker, P., Vasudevan, V., Warden, P., … Zheng, X. (2016). TensorFlow: A system for large-scale machine learning. 12th USENIX Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation (OSDI 16), 265–283. https://www.usenix.org/system/files/conference/osdi16/osdi16-abadi.pdfAmazon
., “Engineering by the numbers,” American Society for Engineering Education, Washington D.C., 2017.[4] M. F. Fox, “Institutional Transformation and the Advancement of Women Faculty: The Case of Academic Science and Engineering,” in Higher Education, J. C. Smart, Ed. Springer Netherlands, 2008, pp. 73–103.[5] D. Bilimoria, S. Joy, and X. Liang, “Breaking barriers and creating inclusiveness: Lessons of organizational transformation to advance women faculty in academic science and engineering,” Hum. Resour. Manage., vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 423–441, Sep. 2008, doi: 10.1002/hrm.20225.[6] S. R. Bird, “Unsettling Universities’ Incongruous, Gendered Bureaucratic Structures: A Case-study Approach,” Gender, Work & Organization
methodology to tell thestory of the multitudinous factors in Chavonne Garza’s life that shaped her journey to and withinengineering. This methodology illuminated ways that many institutions, including academia,were designed and continue to operate without her well-being in mind.Researchers have investigated epistemological and ontological ways that marginalized peoplesengage with STEM. Wilson-Lopez et al.’s investigation of funds of knowledge in Latinxadolescent approaches to engineering demonstrated ways that “participants’ everyday skills andbodies of knowledge aligned with engineering practices” [16, p. 278]. Verdín, Smith, and Lucena[17] engaged the funds of knowledge framework to demonstrate ways that first-generationengineering college students
undergraduateonline engineering courses, we conducted a scoping review with the following research question:In what ways has scholarship addressed potential interrelationships between sense of belonging;online undergraduate engineering education; and diversity, equity, and inclusion?Literature on Sense of BelongingMaslow [8] explained that after physiological and safety needs are met, the need for love and tobelong emerges. Belonging is necessary for all human beings to achieve their full potential. Theconstruct of belongingness was well established by the early 2000’s and has been applied inschool and college settings (see Strayhorn [7] for a comprehensive review). Strayhorn [7] definessense of belonging as “students’ perceived social support on campus, a
–90, Feb. 1990, doi: 10.1901/jaba.1990.23-483.[5] W. P. Hung, “Clicker Clicks It,” Jun. 2011, p. 22.330.1-22.330.12, Accessed: Nov. 12, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/clicker-clicks-it.[6] C. Demetry, “Use Of Educational Technology To Transform The 50 Minute Lecture:,” Jun. 2005, p. 10.1385.1-10.1385.11, Accessed: Nov. 12, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/use-of-educational-technology-to-transform-the-50-minute-lecture.[7] L. V. D. Einde, S. H. Lee, and J. L. Le, “Incorporating Clickers and Peer Instruction into Large Structural Engineering Classrooms,” Jun. 2012, p. 25.759.1-25.759.19, Accessed: Nov. 12, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/incorporating-clickers-and-peer
://www.acenet.edu/Documents/Mapping- Internationalizationon-US-Campuses-2012-full.pdf.[3] Open Doors Report, “Number of International Students in the United States Hits All-Time High,” 2019. https://www.iie.org/en/Why-IIE/Announcements/2019/11/Number-of- International-Students-in-the-United-States-Hits-All-Time-High (accessed Dec. 09, 2020).[4] S. B. Twombly, M. H. Salisbury, S. D. Tumanut, and P. Klute, “Special Issue:Study Abroad in a New Global Century: Renewing the Promise, Refining the Purpose,” ASHE Higher Education Report, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 1–152, 2012, doi: 10.1002/aehe.20004.[5] K. W. Dean and M. B. Jendzurski, “Using Post-Study-Abroad Experiences to Enhance International Study,” Honors in Practice, vol. 9, pp. 99–111, Jan
group may be composed of several teammembers with the same functional role and different team role(s). The nine current Belbin TeamRoles are described in Table 1. Each Team Role is defined by six factors: (1) personality; (2)mental ability; (3) current values and motivation; (4) field constraints; (5) experience; and (6)role learning [15]. Of particular relevance to the VIP Teams’ structure are the connections thatBelbin established between the following six stages of a team’s development and the need forprevailing Team Roles at each stage: (1) identifying needs; (2) finding ideas; (3) formulatingplans; (4) making ideas; (5) establishing team organization; and (6) following through [14].The Belbin Team Roles have been operationalized through
edu-cational setting. Future work will examine if the online offering of EGGN 100 impacted theretention of students.AcknowledgmentsThe author(s) acknowledge that the research work presented in this manuscript is based upon thestudent participants who were enrolled with the National Science Foundation-funded grant,“Building Capacity: Advancing Student Success in Undergraduate Engineering and ComputerScience” under NSF grant number: 1832536.” The contribution of Co-author Sudarshan Kurwad-kar is directly supported through this grant. References1. Mills, J. E, Treagust, D. F. (2003). Engineering Education – Is Problem-based or Project-based Learning the Answer. Australian Journal of Engineering Education http
minority groups may experienceadditional challenges while pursuing STEM degrees and careers [30]. Future research by thisteam will focus on further demographic assessment of the responses. The process will include(1) a similar survey with recruitment specifically targeted at underrepresented women in STEMto identify any additional challenges they may face, and (2) further data analysis of the existingdata set to assess differences between women in academia vs. non-academic jobs. Finally, sincethis survey was completed pre-COVID future assessment will be conducted to determine thechange in women’s challenges/needs during and post-pandemic.References[1] S. Fayer, A. Lacey, and A. Watson, “STEM Occupations: Past, Present, And Future,” p. 35.[2] Y
implies both a temporal dimension, in which organizations are improving all thetime, and a spatial dimension, in which organizations are improving all of their departments,units or divisions. In order to accomplish CI, Deming proposes utilizing the Plan-Do-Check-Act(PDCA) cycle for improvement at any stage [2]. PDCA is a 4-step cycle that repeatscontinuously through which organizations create a plan, execute it, review the results, and finallymake any corrective action before starting again.While Deming’s work was mainly directed towards business, academia took notice. The terms“Continuous Improvement” and “Total Quality Management” started to show up in highereducation research papers by the late 1980’s and early 1990’s [3]. CI then found its
1.16languageI participate in cultural events within my tribal community when 3.77 1.06 3.80 0.97possibleI know some of my tribe’s history 3.94 0.94 4.00 0.85I can identify important leaders for my tribe 3.76 1.07 3.67 1.09I can identify important social, health, political, or economic issues 3.78 1.07 3.76 1.07for my tribeI believe it is important to maintain and/or revitalize our Indigenous 3.80 1.14 3.78 1.15language(s
Award for Excellence in Service-Learning. Dr. Vernaza does research in engineering education (active learning techniques) and high-strain deformation of materials. Recently, she has focused on systemic strategies for the retention and advancement of STEM faculty and students, and academic in- terventions to improve student success. She is currently the Principal Investigator of a $1 million dollar National Science Foundation S-STEM award (2017-21), and she has secured over $2.5 million in grants during her tenure at Gannon University. She is currently the PI of an NSF S-STEM and ADVANCE-PAID grants.Dr. Saeed Tiari, Gannon University Dr. Saeed Tiari is an Associate Professor in the Biomedical, Industrial and Systems
definitions and descriptions, an alternative workingdefinition for troubleshooting would be a type of problem solving that analyzes a faulty systemto identify the fault(s) in the system and then pursue the appropriate procedures to correct thefault(s) in a timely manner.Engineering is one of the domains where well-developed troubleshooting skills can frequentlymake a substantial impact, e.g., when an engineer finds and fixes a problem that has shut down amass transit line. Significantly, it has been observed that the engineers entering industry havepoorly developed troubleshooting skills because they gain little hands-on experience and theyunderuse test equipment in the typical U.S. undergraduate engineering curriculum [5]. Morerecently (in 2018
, and across questions posed by students and instructors, individually. Thehigh frequency of generative design questions is particularly meaningful when compared to twoanalogous studies of peer critiques within a conventional face-to-face setting, in which low-levelquestions were more prevalent. These findings overall support written, asynchronous designcritiques as a useful mode for enhancing exchanges of feedback between student peers.References[1] M. Mandala, C. Schunn, S. Dow, M. Goldberg, J. Pearlman, W. Clark, and I. Mena, “Impact of collaborative team review on the quality of feedback in engineering design projects”, International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 34, no. 4., pp. 1299-1313, 2018.[2] B. Lawson
Oxford, UK. Professor Zilouchian is senior member of several professional societies including Tau Beta Pi, Sigma Xi, Phi Kappa Phi, ASEE and IEEE.Dr. Nancy Romance , Florida Atlantic University Dr. Romance is Professor of Science/Engineering Education and Director of FAU’s STEM Collaborative. She is currently PI on the Title III Hispanic Serving Institution STEM Articulation grant and Co-PI on the College of Engineering and Computer Science’s NSF S STEM grant guiding engineering majors toward completion of a MS degree in Artificial Intelligence. Her work is focused extensively on science and engi- neering activities to promote enhanced classroom engagement of students and increased discipline-based educational
, 45-70.Beddoes, K., Jesiek, B.K., and Borrego, M. (2011). Fostering international engineering educationresearch collaborations: On the need to think beyond the workshop format, Australian Journal ofEngineering Education, 17, 2, 39-54.Biancani, S. Dahlander, L., McFarland, D. A. and Smith, S. (2018). Superstars in the making?The broad effects of interdisciplinary centers, Research Policy, 47, 3, 543-557.Boardman, P.C. and Corley, E. (2008). University research centers and the composition ofresearch collaborations, Research Policy, 37, 5, 900-913.Borrego, M. (2006). Discipline-based views of collaboration in engineering education researchpartnerships, Frontiers in Education Conference, San Diego, CA.Borrego, M, and Newswander L.K. (2008
visual and animation tools. These tools will be accessed through The University ofTexas at Arlington (UTA)’s Web site for use in classrooms globally. The three major steps inachieving this research goal were: (1) accepting data from the user; (2) running a pre-definedexecutable on the input data, which produces “Web-friendly” output file(s); and (3) redirectingthe browser to the output file. This study was successfully completed by using ActiveX controlsthat accept data from the user, transfer and run the FORTRAN executable files, redirect thebrowser to the result files and perform checks before displaying resulting diagrams or tables. Theuniqueness of these tools is that the executables are transferred to the client machine and run onit
] analyzed the “low-choice culture” of engineering curricula, particularly incontrast to other fields of study. In the context of new research demonstrating the value of selfdetermination or autonomy for students in motivating learning, enhancing self-efficacy, andsupporting persistence, the relative inflexibility of engineering curricula stood out starkly. Withinindividual courses, studies have shown the “power of choice” to positively influence studentoutcomes, for example, when students may choose from among a menu of design projects[45, 46], and recommendations have been made for the design of self-determination supportiveengineering-student learning experiences [47, 48]. However, Forbes, et al.,’s statistical analysis ofthe curricula at 46
students’diverse needs and preferences [29]. To this end, future research will apply the abbreviatedDynamics Concept Inventory (aDCI) [30] to examine an instructor’s effect on student academicperformance in the specific context of Prime University.AcknowledgementThis study is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF) under GrantNo. 1525671. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NSF. This workwas conducted with oversight provided by the Purdue University (West Lafayette) InstitutionalReview Board.References[1] M. Stains, J. Harshman, M. K. Barker, S. V. Chasteen, R. Cole, S. DeChenne-Peters, et al., “Anatomy
Engineering Design, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 437–448, Oct. 2009.[7] E. B.-N. Sanders and P. J. Stappers, “Co-creation and the new landscapes of design,” CoDesign, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 5–18, Mar. 2008, doi: 10.1080/15710880701875068.[8] A. Khurana and S. R. Rosenthal, “Towards Holistic ‘Front Ends’ In New Product Development,” Journal of Product Innovation Management, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 57–74, Jan. 1998, doi: 10.1111/1540-5885.1510057.[9] N. Cross, Engineering Design Methods: Strategies for Product Design, 4th ed. West Sussex, England: Wiley, 2008.[10] S. R. Daly, C. M. Seifert, S. Yilmaz, and R. Gonzalez, “Comparing Ideation Techniques for Beginning Designers,” Journal of Mechanical Design, vol. 138, no. 10, pp. 101108- 101108–12, Aug
, as their normal patterns of activities, such as sleep, exercise,and studying, have been disrupted. The present study seeks to gather direct evidence of howstudents are allocating their time (e.g. what activities and for what duration), in an effort to bothinform human-centered course design and to optimize student learning and well-being under theconditions of remote/multi-modal learning and beyond.Literature Review Until relatively recently, there has been little scholarly interest in how students spendtheir time outside of class. This began changing in the late 1990’s and early 2000’s when ahandful of large-scale studies indicated that student spend far less time on learning activities,such as reading or studying, than had been
1.708Sibling(s) encouraged me toward STEM career .023 .633STEM is involved in father’s career .034 .750Female students who reported being interested in an engineering career at the beginning of highschool had higher odds of choosing engineering as a career at the end of high school (OR =9.500; Table 4). It was noticeable that interest in engineering in middle school no longerincreased female students’ odds of choosing engineering as a career at the end of high school. Itcould be inferred that female students’ engineering career interest in middle school only affectedtheir interest at the beginning, not the end of high school, as students might have the option totake more
point, it is essential tointegrate this content into both curricular and co-curricular efforts. It is not enough to spend asingle hour engaged in this work. It is important to find ways to encourage students to explorethese topics in more depth and to allow them to continue to engage in meaningful discussions asthey develop their personal and professional identities.References[1] B. O. Barefoot, C. L. Warnock, M. P. Dickinson, S. E. Richardson and M. R. Roberts, "Exploring the Evidence: Reporting Outcomes of First-Year Seminars. The First-Year Experience. Volume II. Monograph Series, Number 25.," National Resource Center for the First-Year Experience and Students in Transition, 1998.[2] C. Boudreau and J. Kromrey, "A longitudinal
qualitative approach for examining language mediated frames that highlight someaspects of social reality while obscuring other aspects [52]. These frames or discourses may bespoken or communicated through “texts”, including the multimodal texts like videogames [11],[53]. To identify any discourses in Iconoclasts, the author analyzed the recorded dialogue fromthe game and associated notes on the story or storytelling from the research journal. Particularattention was given to engineering and technology topics and what was being included or excludedabout the topic, what assumptions the discourse(s) carried and which characters were invoking thediscourse(s). Previous engineering education research was reviewed to help connect the discoursesin
myunderstanding of patterns within the queer experiences in STEM.ValidityUsing Walther et al.’s [31] framework for achieving validity in engineering educationqualitative research, I present multiple means with which validation was achieved throughoutthis project. By being a member of the GRSM community myself, this study possessessome aspect of communicative validity [32]. This presents me with the ability to filter myparticipants’ stories through my own experiences and knowledge about the community,positioning me as an individual with enough experience and community-specific knowledge toconduct research with this community. I also was forced to navigate challenges within the STEMinstitution as a direct result of my identities as queer and disabled, thus