Assessment.RALPH E. FLORIDr. Ralph E. Flori was educated as a petroleum engineer (UM-Rolla Ph.D. ‘87). As an associate professor in theBasic Engineering Department at the University of Missouri–Rolla, he teaches Dynamics, Statics, Mechanics ofMaterials, and a freshman engineering design course. He is actively involved in developing educational software forteaching engineering mechanics courses. He has earned fourteen awards for outstanding teaching and facultyexcellence.DAVID B. OGLESBYDavid B. Oglesby is a Professor of Basic Engineering and a Research Associate for the Instructional SoftwareDevelopment Center at the University of Missouri–Rolla. Dr. Oglesby received a B. S. degree in Civil Engineeringfrom the Virginia Military Institute in 1963, and M. S
/p1_ub.html “Versatile High Performance Shake Tables Facility towards Real-Time Hybrid Seismic Testing.” University at Buffalo, State University of New York.3 Smith, S. R., C. W. Husted, S. Smith, and B. Cross. “A Web-Based Tutorial and Tele-Operation System for Earthquake Engineering Education.” 30th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Kansas City, Mo, October 18-21, 2000.4 Newman, D. R., B. Webb, and C. Cochrane. “A content Analysis Method to Measure Critical Thinking in Face-to- face and Computer Supported Group Learning.” Interpersonal Computing and Technology, Volume 3, Number 2, pg. 56-77, 1995.5 http://sine.ni.com/apps/we/nioc.vp?cid=1455&lang=US “Virtual Bench” National
Investments, Salvage of End of Life Equipment, Net Income, Taxes, Maintenance costs, Energy CostsThese annual cash flows must now be combined by discounting to the present to obtain thecomplete project present worth. This is accomplished by multiplying each term by (1 + i)j ,where j is the number of years to be discounted to the present. This is shown in the equationbelow where the possibility of energy escalation is also included: PW = – C + S + ∑ ( n I j − Tj ) – M
& Exposition Copyright ©2003, American Society for Engineering EducationAcknowledgementsThe PrE-IOP program and the development and implementation of the curriculum modules issupported through a High-Tech Workforce Excellence Grant from the New Jersey Commissionon Higher Education .References1. Hecker, D.E. (2000). “Occupational Employment Projects to 2010.” Monthly Labor Review, (November), 57-84.2. National Science Board. (2000). Science & Engineering Indicators 2000. Washington, D.C.: U. S. GovernmentPrinting Office.3. Kimmel, Howard and Rockland, Ronald, “Incorporation Of Pre-Engineering Lessons Into Secondary ScienceClassrooms”, Proceedings 32nd ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, November 2002
Colle ge Figure 6. U.S. Female Population with Respect to Race and Completion of Four Years of College, 1950Of all females, the percentage of females obtaining four years of college in 1950 was5.0%, a slight increase from the 3.5% of 1940. In each individual race with respect tocompletion of four years of college, White females obtaining this level, of all Whitefemales, was 5.4%, again, an increase over 1940’s 3.8%. Non-White females obtainingthis level, of all Non-White females, was 2.3%, which, again, is an increase over 1940’s1.4%, for all minority females.Jumping to 19946, there is an overall rise in education in all categories. At this time,people were categorized as White
lecture. An example ofa question from an ethics survey is given below.Q: What was the most useful or meaningful thing(s) you learned?A samples of answers from students is given below: 1) “ I learned about due care in product design and manufacturing. I knew about liability but did not know about magnitude” 2) “The true purpose of engineering is not quality/ productivity of the product (though those are important) but it is the safety of the user/consumer” 3) “A failure in design is not necessarily a bad situation. Failures drive innovation.”Engineering technology curriculum does not have a course on cost analysis. Design teams aregiven an opportunity to learn and develop a simple cost estimation project of constructing
“C” “Surrounding Temperature” Tsurr = 25 “C” “Exiting Pressure” Pe = 50 “kPa” “Power Generated by the Turbine” W = 4000 “kW” “Determine the mass flow rate by dividing by 3600 to get kg/s” m = 25000/3600 “kg/s” “Determine the entropy and enthalpy of the entering steam from Ti and Pi” si = ENTROPY(steam, T=Ti, P=Pi) hi = ENTHALPY(steam, T=Ti, P=Pi) “Determine the entropy and enthalpy of the exiting vapor from Pe, and x=1” se = ENTROPY(steam, x=1, P=Pe) he = ENTHALPY(steam, x=1, P=Pe) “Determine the rate of heat transfer to the environment” Q = W + m*(he-hi) “Determine the rate of entropy generated by this process” Sgen = (-Q/(Tsurr+273))+m*(se-si)The program output was [9]: Unit Settings: [C]/[kPa]/[kg[/[degrees] hi
. 107-111, 1994.[2] H.-Z. Ho, D. Senturk, A. G. Lam, J. M. Zimmer, S. Hong, Y. Okamoto, S.-Y. Chiu, Y. Nakazawa, and C.-P. Wang, "The Affective and Cognitive Dimensions of Math Anxiety: A Cross-National Study," Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, vol. 31, pp. 362 - 379, 2000.[3] "Testimony of Chairman Alan Greenspan," in Committee on Education and the Workforce, U.S. House of Representatives. Washington, D.C., 2000.[4] National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics, 1989.[5] National Research Council, National Science Education Standards. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, 1996.[6] D. Llewellyn, M. Usselman, and G. Kingsley
, Albuquerque, New Mexico.2. Karimi, A., Bench, S., and Hodges, Suzan, “Improving Engineering Student Retention in an Urban University,” Presented at the 2001 Annual Meeting of the Gulf-Southwest Section of ASEE, March 28-30, 2001, College Station, Texas.3. Rogers, A.C., and Karimi, A.,“Design, Build, and Activation Experience in an Undergraduate Mechanical Engineering Program,” ASEE-GSW-2003- IA, Proceeding of the 2002 Annual Meeting of the Gulf- Southwest Section of ASEE, Arlington, Texas, March 19-21, 20034. Wells, L.K. and J. Travis, J., LabVIEW for Everyone, Prentice Hall, 1997 (ISBN:0-13-268194-3).Biographical InformationAMIR KARIMIDr. Karimi is Professor of and Mechanical Engineering and Associate Dean of
Session 2241 Dynamically generated pages using database-to-web technologies: Enhancing library services and operations Amy S. Van Epps Purdue University, West LafayetteAbstractMuch of the information used in libraries is handled and processed through databases. Often anindividual has primary responsibility for data entry of information from many people. If thedatabase has restricted access or is stored on a local machine, then the data entry person may alsohave the responsibility for retrieving information. Database-to-web technologies can be used toallow
wascharged to report back to the ETC by June of 2003 at the ASEE Annual Conference in Nashville.In this paper, the authors will discuss what ET scholarship involves, the importance andrelevance of ET scholarship, appropriate Evaluation of ET scholarship, Faculty Workload(teaching, scholarship and service) Model(s), and the Challenges and Opportunities of ETscholarship. A web-based literature survey is carried out to determine the faculty workloadpolicy that currently exists at various colleges and universities across the country, and thisinformation is used in developing the proposed ET faculty workload model presented in thispaper.IntroductionThe issue of scholarship in Engineering Technology (ET) is becoming an important topic ofdiscussion within
in exploring other markets. In their projects they were able toget a 75% rate of reuse while significantly reducing average product cycle time.National Reconnaissance Office (NRO) and Raytheon. NRO was facing the prospect all gov-ernment agencies faced in the 1990’s, a reduction in their budget and staffing without a reductionin workload. One of the solutions they used was to incorporate a product line approach to thedevelopment of their satellite C2 software2, pages 443–483 . The NRO with assistance from SEI con- Page 8.1237.13tracted Raytheon to develop a package containing the core assets needed to develop any satellite Proceedings of
Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2003, American Society of Engineering Education8. M. Hedley and S. Barrie, “An undergraduate microcontroller systems laboratory”, IEEE Trans. Educ., vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 345, 1998.9. D.B. Kaufman, R.M. Felder, and H. Fuller, “Accounting for individual learning effort in cooperative learning teams,” J. Engineering Educ., pp. 133-140, 2000.10. D.L. Maskell , “Student-based assessment in a multi-disciplinary problem based learning environment,” J. Engi- neering Educ., pp. 237-241, 1999.11. W.J. McKeachie and G. Gibbs, Teaching Tips: Strategies, Research, and Theory for College and University Teach- ers, 10/e, Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1998.12. W.R
assessment results can help students to improveprofessionally, and help faculty to improve curriculum to help ensure student success in theengineering workplace. Page 8.1247.15“Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & ExpositionCopyright © 2003, American Society for Engineering Education”Bibliography1 http://www.ddiworld.com/, January 14, 2003.2 Development of Workplace Competencies Sufficient to Measure ABET Outcomes. S. K. Mickelson, L. F. Hanneman, R.Guardiola, and T. J. Brumm. Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference &Exposition.3 Validation of
activities and presents the results of thesepreliminary surveys, which universally showed a positive learning trend in the course.IntroductionThe freshman “Engineering Design and Graphics” course at the University of Texas at Austincontinues to evolve from its inception many decades ago. In its early days, and up until about1985, the course was primarily a drafting course that taught engineering students how to makemanual board drawings and how to solve spatial geometry problems. The advent of affordabledesktop computers ushered in a short-lived era of “electronic” drafting. In the 1990’s, theEngineering Graphics program at the University of Texas at Austin received a series of NSFeducation grants1-3 to develop a new graphics curriculum based on 3-D
. Figure 22. Seat acceleration at 0.06 second (Note: acceleration units in m/s2) Figure 23. Seat velocity at 0.06 second (Note: velocity units in m/s) Page 8.430.16 Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2003, American Society for Engineering Education Figure 24. Seat global horizontal displacement at 0.06 second (units in meters)5. Multi-body Technique (MADYMO Simulation)A Multi-body seat and ATD were modeled as shown in Figure 25. This model consists of a rigidbody seat defined by planes, which are connected with
. Engineering Workforce Commission of the American Association of Engineering Societies, Inc., Engineering & Technology Enrollments, Fall 2000, Washington, DC, 2000. 3. Engineering Workforce Commission of the American Association of Engineering Societies, Inc., Engineering Degrees & Technology Degrees, 2000, Washington, DC, 2000. 4. Sax, L.J.; Astin, A. W.; Korn, W. S.; and Mahoney, K. M., The American Freshman: National Norms for Fall 2001, Higher Education Research Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, December 2001. 5. Anderson-Rowland, Mary R.; Baker, Dale R.; Secola, Patricia M.; Smiley, Bettie A.; Evans, Donovan L.; and Middleton, James A., “Integrating Engineering Concepts under Current K-12
. Nelson, J. D. and S. A. Napper. 1999. Ramping Up an Integrated Engineering Curri culum to FullImplementation. Proceedings of the Frontiers in Education Conference, San Juan, PuertoRico.4. Nelson, J.D., S. Napper, B. Elmore, J. Carpenter, B. Deese. 1998. An Integrated Freshman EngineeringCurriculum. Frontiers in Education Conference, Phoenix, AZ.5. Hall, D., P. Hadala, and F. Roberts. 2000. Laboratory Exercises for Statics and Mechanics of Materialson a Shoestring. Proceedings of the American Society of Engineering Education Meeting, St. Louis,Missouri.6. Hyams, D.G. 1997. CurveExpert 1.3. http://www.ebicom.net/~dhyams/cvxpt.htm.Biographical InformationDr. David Hall is an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Louisiana Tech University
sharing communication rubrics.This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under award:EEC-0087696. Page 8.1256.7 Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2003, American Society for Engineering EducationReferences1. Wilkerson, L. and Gijselaers, W. H. (eds). Bringing Problem-Based Learning to Higher Education: Theory and Practice. Jossey-Bass Pub., San Francisco, 1996.2. ABET Web Site 3. Barrows, H. S. Problem-Based Learning in Medicine and Beyond: A Brief Overview. pp. 3-12.4. Huba, M. E., & Freed, J. E
Annual Conference Proceedings (2), pp. 2039-2043, June 25-28 1995.[6] P.S. Chinowsky and J.A. Vanegas, “Facilitating Interdisciplinary Civil Engineering Education through aLiving Laboratory,” Proceedings of the 1995 Annual ASEE Conference, Part 1(of 2), pp 596-600, Anaheim, CA,June 25-28, 1995.[7] S. Eisenman and G.F. List, “The Admiral Combs Design Retreat,” paper submitted to the 2003 Annual ASEEConference, Nashville, TN, June 22-25, 2003.[8] G.L. Fiegel and J.S. DeNatale, “Hands-On Geotechnical Engineering at the Undergraduate Level,”Geotechnical Special Publication 109, GeoDenver 2000 Conference ‘Educational Issues in GeotechnicalEngineering,’ pp 71-85, Denver, CO, August 5-8, 2000.[9] R.L. Kolar, K.K. Muraleetharan, M.A. Mooney, B.E. Vieux
instructordecides on the learning objectives, the sequence, the reading materials, and the evaluationprocedure. The classroom is a way of aggregating students and creating an effective distributionchannel for moving knowledge from the instructor to the student(s). The web model of learningand team-based project we have developed for ME444 is based on a different set of principles:Both the instructor and students are co-developers of the course and the learning experience.This pooling of knowledge is critical to creating an exciting learning experience, especially whenit comes to bringing the experiences of each student to the classroom, allowing cross-fertilizationto occur.Finally, our goal is to create frameworks and tools that are appropriate to the new
Page 8.650.3 Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Copyright 2003, American Society for Engineering Education … has never been a threat to science or mathematics, because when we need more scientists or mathematicians, we import them, and science and mathematics lives on. That’s the way we, as a nation, have dealt for decades with SMET shortages…[The United States] imported scientists during World War II; math faculty in the 60’s from England (and questionably left England in a bad situation); graduate students since the 70’s; and faculty today. Yet now our quick-fix importation strategy fails us. We can’t
Session #2615 Too Liberal or Not Liberal Enough: Liberal Arts, Electives, and Professional Skills W.B. Stouffer and Jeffrey S. Russell Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Wisconsin-MadisonIntroductionA well conceived liberal arts education is essential to developing the professional skills neededfor 21st century engineering practice. Currently, the liberal arts comprise a component of mostundergraduate engineering curricula, though as a recent study indicates, not necessarily asignificant or well
,” Computer Applications in Engineering Education, September, 2002, 10(2), pp. 88-97.9. Besterfield-Sacre, ME, LJ Shuman, H. Wolfe, A. Scalise, S. Larpkiattaworn, OS Muogboh, D. Budny, RL Miller, and BM Olds, “Modeling for Educational Enhancement and Assessment.” Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, Montreal, Canada, June 2002.10. Ibid.11. Callison, R., D. Budny, and K. Thomes, “Simulated Conference Meets Academic, Advising, and Library Goals for Freshmen Engineering Students,” American Society for Engineering Education 2002 Annual Conference, June 2002, pp 1 - 23, Montréal, Quebec, Canada.12. Hein, TL and D. Budny, “Learning the ‘Write’ Way in Science and Engineering. 2001 IEEE
Session 3215 Student Chapters – An Adjunct to Engineering Education Tonya L. Emerson, Russell S. Mills California State University, ChicoAbstractNew engineering graduates are expected to possess an ever-expanding array of skills. Yet,classroom synthesis is not conducive to many of these proficiencies. Student professionalsocieties can help cultivate valuable interpersonal, professional and technical skills through avariety of extracurricular activities.The success of a student chapter can be as valuable as the curriculum in defining the quality ofan engineering department