learning.KeywordsLaboratory, assessment, practical skills, pedagogical innovation.IntroductionLearning through laboratory experiments has always been considered an essential part ofundergraduate engineering education. Laboratories help students conceptually understandtheoretical concepts and learn social skills of working in groups. Laboratories also help studentslearn important practical skills required for their profession. Particularly, laboratories ofintroductory courses teach such practical technical skills [1],[2].Laboratory performance evaluation often counts towards a portion of overall grade for theassociated course. For introductory engineering courses, this evaluation completely relies onsuccessful completion and proper reporting of results for individual
Authors’ Response Result ID 1 Shorten the Abstract for the proceedings paper. We have reduced the abstract to three CHANGE MADE paragraphs. 1 In the results report the number of humanities and We appreciate the reviewer’s CHANGE MADE engineering students, and the means for each group, in recommendation to include statistical addition to the overall Likert mean ratings that are results. We have calculated and reported currently reported. these values. 1 Comment on perceived differences between
. Allteachers (N=12) responded to the pre and post questionnaire and all (N=12) participatedin the semi-structured one-one-one interviews. In our analyses we ran descriptivestatistics and non-parametric tests for the quantitative data. For the qualitative data, weemployed constant comparative method and iteratively searched for the main themes andcategories emerged from the analyses. In this paper, we report the study findings anddiscuss the successful and unsuccessful aspects of the two-week PD session from theperspectives of the participating teachers.IntroductionScience, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) have been the foundation forinnovation and technological improvement throughout US history [1]. While the numberof the US jobs
of Wisconsin - Eau Claire. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021Improving Integrated STEM Education: The Design and Development of a K- 12 STEM Observation Protocol (STEM-OP) (RTP)IntroductionThe collective education of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics has beencommonly referred to as STEM education. For K-12 education in the United States, the use ofthe phrase “STEM education” has repeatedly been used in reference to a more integratedcurricular and pedagogical approach, wherein the STEM disciplines are interconnected with oneanother and contextualized by real-world problems [1] – [3]. This shift from teaching the STEMdisciplines in
-related MATLAB projects are assigned along with standard homework andexams. In course reviews, this content is often described as the most challenging with studentsoften citing the inefficacy of the traditional, lecture-based content delivery in synthesizingbiomechanics and programming content. One potential solution to this instructional challenge isconverting the course into a blended format.As the internet becomes more ubiquitous in modern society, it has also become a more commonpresence in higher education. One in three students take an online class in their undergraduatecareer, and most public universities are now offering partially or completely online programs [1].Blended courses combine online and in-person instruction to leverage the
years, universities are looking toimprove their retention and completion rates and the first two years of study are playing a big rolein these two parameters. In addition, the average number of new enrollments in undergraduate EEprograms is flat or increased slowly nationwide, while the same number for the other programsincreased [1]. On the other hand, many of the EE employers are looking only for highly skilledworkers or the students with a graduate degree. Getting graduate degree will result in more yearsof study to get hired in Electrical Engineering.The previous course plan in the EE program at California State University San Marcos was startingwith math, science, and general study courses. Then the plan proceeds into basic circuit theory
up moving out of this at-risk group. Additionally, a 15 question evaluation survey wasadministered to gather student opinions about their user experience.1. IntroductionSpatial visualization skills have been linked to student success in science, technology,engineering and mathematics (STEM) subjects in school [1, 2, 3, 4, 5] and to the likelihood ofparticipation in a STEM undergraduate degree and career [6, 7]. Some groups of students fromunderrepresented populations in STEM seem to struggle with spatial visualization skills [1, 2, 3,8]. Spatial skills are not innate, however, and research shows that students weaker in these skillscan improve with training [1, 2, 3, 9, 10]. With the demand for more STEM professionals K-12educators are hard
motivation and self-assessed learning are discussed.Introduction The importance of hands-on experiences in engineering education has been recognized fordecades [1], yet creating and running an effective hands-on experience, especially in the thermalsciences, is challenging. Several design-build-test projects involving heat exchangers as part of amechanical engineering curriculum have been made [2-5]. Sherwin and Mavromihales reporteda project for students who built cross-flow air-water heat exchangers out of metals tubes that wascarried out for several years [2]. Forsberg presented a capstone design and construction projectinvolving a water-water heat exchanger demonstrator with three modules for double-pipe, cross-flow, and shell and tube
to practicethe entire writing process (e.g. drafting, revising, and proofreading) and facilitating instructors tograde manageable reports to provide timely feedback. The specific objectives of this study are to(1) assess the effectiveness of one-page letter report assignments and associated activities, suchas technical writing instruction, individual practice, peer review, faculty feedback, and use of agood writing sample to improve students’ technical writing and (2) assess the improvement ofthe new ABET outcome 6 by using the one-page letter report at a Hispanic Serving Institution(HSI). Direct measurements were assessed based on scores of students’ reports following arubric, which was created according to the ABET outcome 6 and basic
mustdemonstrate that students have “an ability to identify, formulate, and solve complex engineeringproblems by applying principles of engineering, science, and mathematics” [1].The importance of mathematics is no exception in engineering dynamics, a sophomore-yearfoundational undergraduate engineering course. This course is often required in manyundergraduate engineering programs, such as mechanical, aerospace, civil, environmental,mechanics, biological, and biomedical engineering programs. This course covers numerouslearning topics in Newtonian mechanics, such as Newton’s second law, the principle of work andenergy, the principle of conservation of energy, the principle of linear/angular impulse andmomentum, and the principle of conservation of linear
of the pandemic on past results.IntroductionThe U.S. Social Security (SS) program is one of the largest government programs in the world,ranking as the largest expenditure at 23% of the federal budget in Fiscal 2019 [1]. About 81% ofexpenditures of the Social Security Administration (SSA) went towards retirement benefits inFiscal 2019 [2]. The literature on SS is correspondingly vast. However, the literature on the“when to start” decision usually ignores the time value of money and addresses risk onlyqualitatively. This paper will show how a student engineering economic case study can do better.Unlike a supplied case, this is a real-world problem. Information is available from many possiblesources. Detailed rules must be read and understood
his or her needs for belongingness and uniqueness” (p.1265). Team member perception of belongingness and uniqueness creates feelings of inclusivitywithin a team setting; behaviors related to these areas are described in Shore et al.’s (2011)framework for inclusion as shown in figure 1.Figure 1Shore et al. 2011 Inclusion FrameworkFrom “Inclusion and Diversity in Work Groups: A Review and Model for Future Research”, byShore, Randel, Chung, Dean, Ehrhart, and Singh, 2011, Journal of Management, 37(4), p. 1266.The Authors 2011. Promoting feelings of inclusiveness requires intentional behaviors, and leaders are in aposition to practice these behaviors to foster inclusive environments within teams. Their uniquepositions within the workplace
disadvantaged, [and]multi-minority female [1].” More recent contributions have brought to the fore the experiences ofblack, male students [2], international students grappling with mental health issues [3], andstudents with disability [4] . Such accounts provide a foundation for understanding what needs tobe addressed in order to move from exclusion to inclusion.Approaches for promoting inclusion. In addition, a growing body of work offers potential actionsor practices that can be pursued in order to work toward inclusion. For example, a recent blogpost for the ASEE Commission on Diversity, Equity and Inclusion [5] summarizes some of theirown work on the experiences of marginalized students and offers three kinds of actions that thosein engineering can
performance and scores when visual cuing was incorporated [1] [2], [3],[4], [5]. Marquez and Garcia reported that the physical understanding of fundamental concepts inEngineering Mechanics were strengthened by the integration of visual tools during lecturesessions, and aided their understanding of real-world applications [17].With the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, the routinized and normalization of the educationalprocess was thrown into a tailspin that forced both educators and students to adapt to a profoundlydifferent learning environment. This new, complex environment presented educators bothchallenges and opportunities to reimagine, reassess, and reorganize course structure, contentdelivery, and assessments in a complete virtual setting
Science offered by my department is taken by a variety ofstudents bringing a variety of backgrounds and exhibiting a variety of aptitudes and interests.Myriad challenges accompany the goal of turning out college students well prepared to continuetheir university education. A classic novel, chosen for a computing-related theme, provides notonly a rich literary experience but also practice in concentrated reading and a platform for variousexercises on aspects of computing. As far as this author can tell, scholarly work on theincorporation of literature into computing courses is lacking. Endeavors to integrate humanitiesinto computing (and other technology) fall into categories such as understanding technologythrough science fiction [1], design for
. For that purpose,two different setups were applied: there were undergraduate students only project teams and graduatestudents only project teams in one section, while there were six combined undergraduate and graduatestudent teams in the other.In this research, we investigate two different hypotheses about groups setup: (1) groups in whichundergraduate and graduate students are combined perform better than undergraduate- or graduate-onlygroups and (2) when there are graduate students in a team, groups of more graduate students perform better.Findings about the group construction for the team project in this research can also be very useful whenestablishing undergraduate/graduate integrated courses in the department. After an overview of the
-principles study within Illinois Materials Research Science and Engineering Center.Dr. Matthew D. Goodman, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign Dr. Goodman received degrees in Materials Science and Engineering from Iowa State (B.S. & M.S.) and the University of Illinois (Ph.D.). He is a lecturer in the Materials Science and Engineering Depart- ment at University of Illinois since 2014 with current research interests in (1) energy harvesting and stor- age obtained through nanostructured materials, (2) engineering education research through outreaches, specifically in the K-12 classroom, and (3) improving engineering education in the college curriculum.Prof. Jessica A. Krogstad, University of Illinois at Urbana
-2007. • Summer 2006 Dissertation Fellowship, Wayne State Univ., 2006. • Albort Travel Award, Wayne State Univ., 2005. • Best Poster Award, Fifth Graduate Research Symposium, Wayne State Univ., 2005. • Best Presenter Award, Fourth Graduate Research Symposium, Wayne State Univ., 2004. • Second Prize of Tsinghua Scholarship, Tsinghua University, China, 1999. • Second Prize of Tsinghua Scholarship, Tsinghua University, China, 1998. JOURNAL PUBLICATIONS 1. Li, J., S. Feaster, and A. Kohler, ”A Multi-Objective Multi-Technology (MOMT) Evaluation and Analysis Framework for Ammonia Synthesis Process Development”, Computer Aided Chemical Engineering, Volume 47, 2019, Pages 415-420. 2. Li, J., and M. Li, ”On-line Bayesian
students willenroll in graduate school [1, 2, 3, 4]. Undergraduate research opportunities have beenparticularly successful for improving these metrics for underrepresented populations [5, 6, 7]. Asa result, several nationally-recognized programs have focused on increasing the number oftraditionally underrepresented groups in engineering to try research as undergraduate students.For example, the Meyerhoff Program at the University of Maryland, Baltimore County (UMBC)is a four-year undergraduate program that attracts top high school students and prepares them forgraduate school. Admission preference is given to students “who are interested in theadvancement of minorities” and those who already plan to pursue a PhD in STEM [8].Meyerhoff Scholars are
American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021WIP: Increasing Faculty Participation in Pedagogical Diversity and Inclusion ActivitiesIntroductionUnder-represented minority (URM) (Black/African American, Hispanic, and AmericanIndian/Alaskan Native) and female students often face an unwelcoming and unsupportiveclimate in higher education [1][2][3]. This is especially true in engineering, where this hostileclimate can lead to an achievement gap. The achievement gap is the difference in academicperformance between minoritized student populations and their non-minority peers. If leftunchecked, this achievement gap can affect student persistence in engineering and eventuallyaffect
gender gap in computing is socially and culturally related, meaning that efforts toimprove participation are needed in places other than just the classroom. It is important thatcomputing departments provide leadership and support for faculty, staff, and students indeveloping, implementing, and operating activities that are designed to recruit and retain womenin the computing fields. This paper describes the experience of a large computing department’seffort in recruiting and retaining women. We describe strategies targeted at all levels of thedepartment and how these closely interconnected strategies can help increase women’sparticipation under a resource-constrained scenario. The key strategies are: 1) leadershipcommitment, 2) faculty and staff
tointroduce students to state-of-the-art principles of “Advanced Manufacturing Engineering for theAerospace Industry.” We use modern aircraft and industry practices as examples for students toillustrate topics of how design, aerodynamics, propulsion, structure, and performance areinfluenced by aerospace materials, manufacturing processes, quality systems, and industryregulations. We aim to prepare future technical specialists and/or business leaders for theaerospace industry. This paper details the process, challenges, and strategies associated withimplementing this course.1 IntroductionThe aerospace and defense (A&D) industry is vital to the U.S. economy. It contributed $909 billionin total sales revenue and nearly $64 billion in federal, state
Lab Implementation (Work in Progress)IntroductionManufacturing is one of the largest economic drivers in the United States, but withoutintervention, its successes might be short-lived. This warning is not original, nor is it new.Organizations like Deloitte [1] have been keeping a close eye on the state of themanufacturing industry in the United States for years and have predicted that the country maybe in trouble. As increasing retirement numbers from the baby-boomer generation looms overthe horizon, a lack of interest and awareness for manufacturing careers from the nextgeneration is creating a vacuum of talent for tomorrow’s jobs [2]. Even if the trend ofpushing back the retirement age continues, there may still not be enough new employees
being said, there may be someimpact to the students’ positive or negative reactions. The impact of the virtual modality willlargely be ignored for the paper.This work was reviewed and approved by Wentworth Institute of Technology’s InstitutionalReview Board for human subjects in research.3 Literature Review and Related WorkResubmissions and Multiple Attempts: There are numerous previously published worksaddressing a policy of allowing students to submit incorrect or incomplete work multipletimes [1, 3, 9, 20, 21, 23, 25, 29, 32], but each varies in its focus or implementation. Moore andRanalli tracked the faculty time and impact for a mastery-based approach to homework, allowingtwo resubmissions per student [25, 29], which is especially
1 2 1.6 - - Domestic International 119 60 74 57.4 45 65.2 Domestic 79 40 55 42.6 24 34.8 Degree Masters 100 51 61 47.3 39 56.5 Doctoral 98 49 68 52.7 30 43.5 N 198 129 69Table I shows the demographics of the students who participated in the study. Overall,more students from the comparison group (n = 129, 65%) than students from the treatmentgroup (n = 69, 35%) participated in the study. There were more male students (n = 150,76%) than female
report in 2019.The processes presented may help engineering programs attempting to address improvement inthis ABET student outcome and motivate interest in increased collaboration with theirengineering library to strengthen instruction in information literacy.IntroductionThe ABET Engineering Accreditation Commission (EAC) transitioned to a new set of studentoutcomes defined in Criterion 3 in the 2019-2020 academic year, culminating a decade ofreview, assessment, and constituent consultation [1], [2]. However, the new outcomes did notrepresent a full departure from the former outcomes. ABET provided a mapping between the oldand new student outcomes in its accreditation updates [3]. Student Outcome 7 (an ability toacquire and apply new knowledge
them. CIT-E has remained active since the conclusion ofthe grant. Through the organization of yearly workshops, it has been welcoming new membersand providing participants an opportunity to grow as educators, increase their professionalnetwork, and develop new materials collaboratively. This paper describes the results of an impactanalysis of CIT-E through the lens of a community of practice.IntroductionThe Center for Infrastructure Transformation and Education (CIT-E, pronounced “city”) is anexisting, thriving community of practice (CoP) with a shared domain of interest in supportingmore effective Civil and Environmental Engineering education [1]. The CIT-E CoP exists in bothphysical and cyber environments. In-person workshops have been held
strong liberal artstradition. In this first year WFU Engineering course, students are introduced to the study andpractice of engineering with an emphasis on the human-centered design process. Within thiscourse, a semester-long module called “What is Engineering?” showcases (1) the intersection ofhistory and engineering to emphasize global and societal contexts, (2) foundational knowledge tosupport the development of one’s engineer identity (with historical contexts and engineerexemplars), and (3) the importance of courage as a virtue that is foundational to the practice ofengineering. Within this module, which has been under development the past four years,engineering, history, philosophy, and professional identity come to life. Engaging
andculture. Findings indicate concerns with the traditional barriers of time and workload. However,they also indicate that there is some expectation for Scrum to decrease elements of the facultyworkload and reduce time to complete tasks. These findings also build on the understanding ofhow faculty collaboration is perceived as both a barrier and affordance to departmental change.This paper is preferred to be presented in a lightning talk, round table discussion, or poster.IntroductionEngineering departments operate based on institutional policy and procedures as well as normsestablished through the lifetime of the department [1], [2]. When approaches an institutionalchange effort there are several factors that affect decision making. These factors
meet the demands of an ever-changing society. To meet suchchallenges, the educational system must also adapt to properly equip students with skills neededfor success.ABET, an accreditation agency for engineering programs, identifies that engineering curriculumsmust meet and educate students to be competent in a variety of outcomes that prepare graduatesfor professional practice [1]. Such outcomes and skills are listed under Criterion 3 of ABETwhich include but are not limited to: being efficient in identifying and solving complexproblems, producing effective solutions while considering influential factors, having effectivecommunication, recognizing ethical and professional responsibilities, functioningcollaboratively, drawing conclusions