thatthere are difficulties in proper delivery of systems analysis and systems dynamics to engineeringstudents; the fact remains that: these tools are extremely useful for someone who plans tobecome a designer. Therefore, ways have to be found to enhance the understanding of systems’thinking, and at the same time, to develop educational experiences that could efficiently improvelearning outcomes.2) Looking at risk management and uncertainty: Engineering design is carried out relying onincomplete data, imperfect models, often with unclear objectives, and other potential problemsand constraints. The effects of such uncertainties on the design of a project may have seriousconsequences unless proper safeguards have been undertaken based on probabilistic
were initially offered only on campus to students currently enrolled in Ph.D.engineering programs at the Purdue University. All of the courses relied upon extensive student-student and student-faculty interaction. Students read assigned materials, discussed them inclass with the instructor, and then used information gleaned from the reading and discussions tocomplete assignments that would be useful in performing their duties as faculty members.Some examples of assignments are a syllabus and materials for a course in the student’stechnical field, an interactive presentation of course materials, a detailed teaching philosophy,and a plan for mentoring graduate students. Students often peer reviewed materials prepared byclassmates, and faculty
availability of time which led to the creation of Project Days, in whichthe students would work on their project individually with the instructor present so that promptfeedback could be given on their designs. The extensive planning necessary to flip a classroommeans that a detailed schedule of topics is typically available to the students at the outset of thecourse. That detailed schedule proves invaluable when students plan how to best work on theproject. One drawback of problem-based learning is that students report spending more timeworking on the course [19] which increases the time requirements on an already crowded studentschedule. However, this is offset by the use of the flipped format as students spend approximately20 % less time outside of
Foundation Design Environmental Environmental Engineering Environmental Engineering Engineering Water/Wastewater Treatment Water/Wastewater Treatment Transportation Transportation Engineering Transportation Engineering and/or Engineering Highway Design Planning Traffic Design Highway Design Transportation Planning and Management Traffic Design Water Resources Water Resources Engineering Water Resources Engineering Engineering Hydraulics Hydraulics and/or Hydrology Hydrology Construction Construction
by the instructor and three enrolled.Spring 2018: Rolling Out of the ProjectHaving the project scope and objectives determined, and the student recruitment completed, thenext step was to arrange a meeting between the relevant parties. The meeting was attended by theclient and the university team, composed of the students and instructor, as well as the schoolchair. During the meeting, the client gave the background of the problem and established arelationship with the university team. In addition, he provided details on what type of restorationwas acceptable, the budget and answered the team’s questions which included the vehicledelivery details. After the meeting, the university team began discussing a plan to tackle theproblem. This
Engineers (ASCE) serves as the Lead Society for the Civil Engineering ProgramCriteria [1]. The EAC/ABET General Criteria and the Civil Engineering Program Criteria definethe minimum requirements for accreditation of Civil Engineering programs.ASCE’s Committee on Accreditation (COA) has adopted an eight year cycle for reviewing andrevising the civil engineering program criteria. The plan for long term management of change wasdiscussed by Ressler and Lynch [2]. To initiate the cycle, the ASCE Committee on Education(COE) assembled a Task Committee to review the current Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge(BOK) and to determine if revisions are needed. The BOK defines the knowledge, skills, andattitudes necessary for entry into the practice of civil
that all AC wires terminals are isolated properly and secured. Configure the communication between the PLC and PC. Complete and finish wiring check and test the conductivity before turning the main switch ON. The objectives of the intermediate PLC wiring are foe students to be able to a- Write a small PLC program b- Test the inputs signals and send signal to activate the solenoid valve to extend the stroke.The fluid power course is offered every semester during regular academic year and theenrollment, though varies, is about 20 to 28 students. The course instructor is planning to have 3students work on a single portable pneumatic trainer (so, a total number of 10 trainers will bebuilt) and at the end of the lecture, each group
), ability to plan and design a system, component orprocess that meets desired needs (abet c), ability to use techniques, skills, and modern engineeringtools necessary for engineering practice, including computer tools and information technology(abet k), and the ability to design and conduct experiments as well as to analyze and interpret data(abet b).The course topics traditionally include computer-aided structural analysis of trusses, 2D-framesfor gravity and lateral loads and load combinations, computer-aided structural design of 2D-frames, setting up of an experiment on a small shake table and dynamic experimentation,computer-aided structural dynamic analysis with time history, and verification of computer-aidedanalysis results with
generatea wide list instead of focusing specifically on engineering fields. This emphasized thatresearchers may utilize a wide spectrum of lenses to study different aspects of EEPs due to theinterdisciplinary nature of entrepreneurship education and the nascent state of research in thefield. Furthermore, this reiterates the need to consider the key theories when researching EEPs,specifically student participation for our case. To identify the key theories, the documentedtheories were assessed for their level of use based on the number of times they were cited in the359 articles. Theories that were cited in at least 10 articles were shortlisted, yielding a total ofseven key theories – 1) Theory of Planned Behavior [32], 2) Theory of Reasoned Action
fundraising strategy and action plan according to the target budget. [IDENTIFY unexpected opportunities to create extraordinary value] (3/4) Illustrate the impact of the triple bottom line on the design project. [EXAMINE societal and individual needs, DISCERN and PURSUE ethical practices]The subset of learning objectives for Competition Projects 2 (Spring) associated with anentrepreneurial mindset are as follows with Bloom’s taxonomy levels in parentheses. Eachlearning objective is also matched to associated entrepreneurial mindset example behaviors asdefined in the KEEN framework. (6) Justify through presentation the value of the vehicle. [EVALUATE technical feasibility and economic drivers, CONVEY engineering
collecting attendance at each session and administering programmaticassessment tools throughout the semester.In an effort to continually improve the program, the SI Program Coordinator reformed thetraining activities for the fall 2017 semester, based on the learning outcomes of the University ofMissouri Kansas City’s Supplemental Instruction Training Conference program in the summer of2017. The program strongly emphasized implementing peer-led, collaborative practices inside SIsessions, conducting observations early and often, and requiring all SI leaders to plan theirsessions with engaging activities that they submitted prior to the session for feedback anditerative cycles of improvement.At the end of each semester, the SI coordinator collates all
learning course is to provide freshmen the opportunity not only to complete a hands-on project but also to learn and develop real skills that would benefit them in future coursework, student group activities, research and internships. Moreover, the course was also designed to meet in small (24 students) sections to allow engagement between students, and between the faculty instructor and the students. Lastly, the project focus affords students the opportunity to gain experience with the design process, teamwork, and communication. In this paper, the course is described in detail along with examples, results, impact and future plans. Course Organization and Development An important first consideration in the development of
systems. His further research is done through the United States Navy emphasizing in technological upgrades to the surface fleet.Mr. Alexander John Norway, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology Alexander Norway is a senior in the Mechanical Engineering Department at New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology. He is seeking a bachelor’s degree in Mechanical Engineering with no plans for a minor. He has conducted research under Dr. Kimberley, focusing on Dynamic Deformation. His further research is done with Dr. Kimberley and Dr. Grow in cooperation with Los Alamos National Labs.Ms. Victoria Joyous DuPriest, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology Victoria DuPriest is currently a sophomore studying Mechanical
Processing with their favorite color or hue filling itin. This is a way for students to see if they are coding colors correctly. If students finishearly, they can add more shapes and more colors before each shape; they will see thateach shape can then be filled in with different colors!PurposeStudents can connect this activity to the engineer design process as seen below: Ask: Imagine: Plan: Students ask how to Students will begin to think Students will need to pick a create a colorful shape in Processing. → of ways to explore hue, color, and
academic plans at college entry, including: Whether students planned to pursue engineering as a career after college. How likely they were to change major during college (on a four-point scale from very unlikely to very likely). The highest degree to which students aspired during their lives. Students’ intended major, included to test differences among engineering fields. The importance of getting a better job as a reason for them to attend college (measured on a three-point scale from not important to very important), assuming this reason might explain why they were motivated to select engineering.A set of institution-level variables collected by both CIRP and IPEDS were included to test forpotential
University Fort Wayne, Fort Wayne, IN 46805, USA Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science3 Cleveland State University, Cleveland, OH 44115, USAAbstractNeural network system, a portion of artificial intelligence, is increasingly becoming prevalentnowadays. This paper presents a pedagogical study applied in a neural network field. Theapplication of neural network models to function approximation is one of the latest developments inelectrical engineering including robotics motion planning and navigation. It is, however, achallenging task to instruct on this topic in computational intelligence techniques course. In general,a function approximation issue aims to select a function among a well
-engineering major” .More students were confident in their Calculus abilities (76% “Confident” or “Veryconfident”) versus Physics (52%), Computer Skills (45%), or Chemistry (36%).Eighty-nine percent of the respondents thought they had strong problem-solving skills,75% felt confident in their ability to succeed in engineering and 70% thought theyneeded to spend more time studying. Over half planned to join a student engineeringorganization. Interestingly, 42% did not feel they knew what an engineer does and 62%tend to procrastinate, putting off the things they need to do.Overall students gave very positive feedback to the DEE program and to the teachingassistants. Nearly all respondents (98% “Agree” or “Strongly agree”) would recommendDEE to other
, which is authentic reflection on the process. Some of the groups that we looked atdid very thoughtfully reflect on points such as how this assignment and course altered theirperceptions of engineering practice, and how their team carried out the design process to accountfor CSR. However, most team reflections were superficial and vague, at best, a result we havealso seen in past work incorporating reflection into engineering courses [12]. We plan to providebetter guidance to the students moving forward on what high-quality reflections look like. Wealso will work to weave CSR more completely throughout the semester. A few students observedon the end-of-semester course evaluations that it was a focus at the beginning and end of thecourse, but was
sessionsconnected research to practice. First, the leadership team determined the topics for eachworkshop. Then the project leadership created a time management schedule. The projectleadership team then selected readings, websites, videos, or other content for each session. Thisinformation was then utilized to develop PowerPoints presentations.A cohesive “workshop” plan was developed for each session, which then went through athorough review process. Each workshop consisted of an introduction, brief discussion ofhomework results, a mini-lecture covering the main topic for that session, then one or twofacilitated activities (ie. breakout discussions, think-pair-share, active learning activities), andconcluded with a report back from group work or a
andstatistical analyses plans to test their chosen specification. When possible, the teams areencouraged to present the preliminary results or simulations. This project is assigned at thebeginning of the quarter, and the teams are encouraged to work on it throughout the quarter inparallel with their design process. The project results are then presented in class in place of thefinal exam.AssessmentIn the current academic year, the Biomedical Device Evaluation course was taught for the firsttime (N = 45 students). In May 2019, a survey will be administered to assess the students’perceived knowledge of the regulatory and device evaluation topics, their level of confidence inthat knowledge relative to other professional BME topics, and its applicability
coordinator for the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering. She teaches at the graduate and undergraduate level, using both face-to-face and blended online learning instruction. She is an Adjunct Faculty for the Transportation Systems and, the City & Regional Planning programs at MSU. Her research interests include engineering education, student success, online engineering pedagogy and program assessment solutions, transportation planning, transportation impact on quality of life issues, bicycle access, and ethics in engineering. She has several published works in engineering education and online learning. Dr. Petronella James earned her Doctor of Engineering (Transportation) and Masters of City &
used.The ability to practice GD&T in student engineering drawings, as well as machining assemblieswith GD&T specifications makes a more competent mechanical engineer, who knows how toreduce the total time and budget required to complete a satisfactory design project.IntroductionIn the Fall and Spring semester of their Senior year, the Mechanical Engineering students arerequired to design and fabricate a machine for their capstone projects. A popular machine for theSeniors to design and manufacture is a Stirling Engine. In the Fall semester, each design group isrequired, among others, to create their designs using a Computer Aided Design software andproduce engineering drawings for all of the parts they plan to manufacture. Prior to this
, engineering technology college courses. Inaddition, warrant officers operate as leaders in their units, not only providing technical expertise, but alsomanaging, planning, organizing, supervising and controlling jobs and worksites in a military setting.How does warrant officer training compare to technology or business courses in a typical four-yearcollege? This paper examines the ACE credit recommendations for ten current warrant officer specialtycourses with technology containing curriculum to compare them to typical technology courses accreditedby ABET, formerly the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology [3]. In most cases, thetraining does not warrant credit recommendations for significant amounts of technical training, but thecredit
instructors. Your University may have apolicy on this. Check your faculty handbook to see if there is a time stipulated by which youmust respond to students online or in email. It is most often either 24 or 48 hour response time.Whichever you select as a logon frequency, it is important to clearly communicate it so thatstudents know how often to expect you in class and how long turnaround time will take ondiscussion postings. Once you have explained what students can expect from you as aninstructor, you can then clearly state your expectations for student logon.It is good practice to ask students to plan on logging into your class a certain number of dayseach week. Most college courses meet three days per week. It is reasonable to expect yourstudents
underrepresented minority (URM) students at Seattle University, we will conduct multiple focus groups with current engineering and CS students. We are planning six focus groups and invite the following student populations to join the group that they most associate with: 1) US‐born women 2) URM women (including South East Asian and Pacific Islanders but not Asian); 3) URM men (including South East Asian and Pacific Islanders but not Asian); 4) international students (mix of men and women); 5) mixed group; and 6) students who are still at Seattle University who have left engineering and computer science or students still enrolled in any engineering program but with a GPA currently below what is required to graduate. We are interested in hearing from
skills can include: Understanding of and ability to use relevantmaterials, equipment, tools, processes, or products, awareness of quality issues and theirapplication to continuous improvement. Graduates must have developed transferable skills,additional to those set out in the other learning outcomes, that will be of value in a wide range ofsituations, and plan self-learning and improve performance, as the foundation for lifelong learning[12]. “Service-learning is a form of experiential education where learning occurs through a cycle ofaction and reflection as students work with others through a process of applying what they arelearning to community problems, and at the same time, reflecting upon their experience as theyseek to achieve real
initiatives as an impact on students’subjective experience as an undergraduate engineering student.This paper provides background and status of current and planned initiatives in the Faculty ofEngineering at the University of Windsor to build a peer-mentoring program by way ofindividual initiatives that together will benefit our undergraduate students both as mentors andmentees.BackgroundWhile literature supports undergraduate research-based peer programming that includes teams offaculty and graduate students mentoring the undergraduate students [2], [3], the University ofWindsor’s Outstanding Scholars program is one that provides all undergraduate studentsmultiple research placements with a faculty mentor and their graduate students. The
all the variables within the stratified sampling, but the protocol used was the same foreach institution.Program assessmentFormative and summative assessment instruments will be used to evaluate and assess bothproduct and process to provide assessment results within and between institutions and by cohorttype (F-LEARN and T-LEARN). The assessment plan will use a mixed-method approach [3] toassess the effectiveness in fulfilling the desired learning outcomes, which are:1. Fall-to-fall retention, credits earned, GPA, and graduation rates of LEARN® cohorts will be higher when compared to matched intra-institutional comparison control groups2. Students in the program will show developmental gains in critical thinking and oral/written
novel teaching approach in engineering education because of the many factorsthat go into incorporating writing into a technical classroom. To address these concerns andbarriers, development and research plans for a scaffolded writing pedagogy are described below.Implementation in the Fluid Mechanics ClassroomTo follow the studies that have already been performed by the IUSE group at WSU, the writingpedagogy will be tested in the junior-level, the fluid mechanics and heat transfer course (CHE332) in parallel with the current hands-on learning implementation.i. Targeting Higher Levels in the Cognitive DomainTo target higher levels in the cognitive domain, it is crucial to start with the students’ conceptualfoundation. Identifying common
material and format are deployed with efficacy [18-19]. Inthis particular study the instructor was female, and as noted by other researchers [20], maycontribute to an overall lower impression of knowledge. However, this defense is furthercomplicated because the graduate student leaders in this study were also female in gender. It ispossible that graduate students, despite being female, were able to develop trust/confidence inthe students through spending more time with them. Normally, the format of the LEAP modelallows for about five hours of planned contact between the leader and their students, but it ispossible that the female leaders made additional time investments. This possibility will alter theinformation that we collect during subsequent