plan for future learning and how you will continue to make progress in your intercultural journey, especially as a future leader in energy.For these live sessions, the first ½ hour was reserved to discuss the content of the learning modulewith the instructors and with other graduate students in breakout rooms; the second ½ hour wasreserved to listen to invited speakers and then ask them questions.1Also, each graduate student participant received a year-long license to Country Navigator, adynamic, interactive online tool for improving intercultural knowledge and engagement(https://www.countrynavigator.com/), with audio and video content for easy learning on bothgeneral topics related to Cultural Intelligence, as well as country
, management, and successful completion of real-world engineering challenges.Throughout the course, students integrated previous knowledge to complete engineering analysis;practiced elements of the engineering design process; developed and implement project plans; andpracticed professional skills, such as working on teams and communicating technical outcomeseffectively. Industry mentors/clients were recruited and provided topics for teams that resulted inthree industry sponsored projects, one startup based, and one student organization project. Anonline platform (EduSourced) was implemented for external mentors, in addition to the universityblackboard system (Canvas) for internal use to grade assignments and monitor progress. Studentswere assigned
data transfer between theflight system and the ground station. This will ensure reliable transmission of real-time teleme-try during ascent and descent. Additionally, we plan to integrate three supplementary payloads:(1) a 5.7k resolution 360° camera for flight documentation, (2) a SPOT Trace GPS tracker forredundancy in tracking and recovery, and (3) a venting system to regulate internal pressure andtemperature of the balloon. These components were core elements of the University’s contribu-tions to the Nationwide Eclipse Ballooning Project from 2022 to 2024 [5].Result & Discussion The preliminary findings from this research reflect not only strong technical progress toward asuccessful flight in June 2025, but also highlight the
Curricular Pathway in Environmental EngineeringAbstractCurrently, students majoring in civil engineering at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology(RHIT) do not get exposure to discipline-specific course content in environmental engineeringuntil the final quarter of Year 3. We’ve noticed that many students we’ve advised come into theirfirst year with an interest in environmental engineering, but they tend to choose different pathsbefore they even have a course in environmental engineering. We developed a plan that re-envisions the pathway for the environmental engineering curriculum. We evaluated differentscenarios of curriculum pathways to provide students with exposure to environmentalengineering content earlier in their academic career. Through this
-task a student is willing to spend on learning. 4. Quality of Instruction: Clearly identify what is to be learned, connect students with learning materials, carefully planned and ordered steps. 5. Ability to Understand Instruction: Language comprehension, ability of student to understand what the learning task is and how to learn it. For engineering classes, language comprehension may mean mathematics background.One experimental test of Carroll’s theory is presented in [6].Carroll’s definition of aptitude as the time required to learn, rather than the ability to learn hasfundamental implications for engineering education, particularly for retention in an era ofreduced math skills. The time spent learning will actually be the
SYSTEMS THINKING PROJECTModule Name Learning Outcome/Objective Framework UtilizedSystems Thinking The objective of this project is to introduce [17]Project systems thinking to the cohort and further their thinking mindset by promoting leadership and situational thinking in a systemic way.Action Plan Template Each systems thinking project group is [17] asked to provide a detailed description of the problem and why it is an important problem to solve, create a system map of the different systems that may be involved
Vehicles (UAVs). It analyzesfocus areas in CPS development and provides strategic guidance for future industry efforts.Background: Cyber-Physical Systems and UAVs have reshaped modern military operations,supporting critical tasks such as surveillance, reconnaissance, and mission planning. Despiteincreased budget allocation for Research, Development, Testing, and Evaluation (RDT&E),addressing other nations’ threats remains a significant challenge. Also, the confidential natureof defense programs limits the level of detail available in reports, making it difficult for industrystakeholders to identify priority areas and align their efforts effectively with defense objectives.Methodology: This research analyzes DoD reports, including the Cyber
useResource Efficiency Cost per student 80% Monthly Infrastructure planning, Usage patterns Support resolution <24 hours Weekly Staff availability, Issue complexity ROI timeline 2.5 years Yearly Implementation costs, Usage rates 11 RecommendationsBased on our comprehensive analysis, we
Engineering (CSE) Department at the University of Texas at Arlington. Heholds a Ph.D. in Computer Science from Southern Methodist University and specializes in softwareengineering, agile methodologies, distributed systems and networks. Dr. Khalili is a member of theAssociation for Computer Machinery and the IEEE Computer Society. He has work experience withFidelity Investments and Mobile Oil.DAN KESSLERMr. Kessler is serving as the Assistant Director of Transportation for the Associate Director NorthCentral Texas Council of Governments (NCTCOG), the Metropolitan Planning Organization for theDallas-Fort Worth area. He holds a M.S. in Urban and Regional Planning from the University ofIllinois and oversees the activities of the Transportation Department
, girl scouts, etc. - Sharing what other clubs do (especially as new students checking out different clubs/student groups) As a full-time staff member, I performed all logistical structure, planning for meetings, and administrative oversight.Collaborative Signature Event September 16, 2023 - End of Week 3 Women+ in STEM Student Leader Symposium gathered 25 student leaders to share their club/organizations’ plans for the new academic year, connect with other student leaders from affinity groups to learn about ways their groups support one another, participate in networking and professional development workshop, and enjoy lunch together. Co-hosted by Women in Technology, NERD Girls in STEM, Women in Engineering, Women
measuring interest in STEM content and careers [12]. Process evaluationswere conducted with participants at each session (including the art and dance sessions) to capturethe participants’ perceptions of session implementation, participant satisfaction, and participantengagement (behavioral and cognitive engagement) in each session [13]. In addition, studentengagement was captured via a self-evaluation at the end of enrichment activities. Evaluation andattendance data was monitored continuously throughout the programs to inform planning, qualityimprovement, operational decisions, and to measure impact. In addition to the academicevaluations, we tracked the community impact over time to measure our progress, including thenumber of new organizational
, teams must program and test a LEGO robot to complete specific missionswithin time constraints. FLL 2022-2023 Season: SuperPowered™ [6] was chosen as a basebecause the energy theme is relevant to a variety of engineering majors for the innovationcomponent.On Day 1 of the project, students are assigned to teams of six and begin the project bycompleting a team contract that outlines expectations for collaboration, communication,individual responsibilities, a project timeline, and plans for conflict resolution. This step helps setthe tone for shared accountability and effective teamwork throughout the project.A key focus of Day 1 is giving students flexibility to define their energy problem and choose towork on the innovation component, robotics
she has chaired. Her current research includes investigating how K-5 students plan, fail, and productively persist, and how simulated classroom environments can be used to help pre-service and in-service teachers practice facilitating discussions in science and engineering. FYEE 2025 Conference: University of Maryland - College Park, Maryland Jul 27 Full Paper: Characterizing Conflicts in Student Design Teams in an Introductory Engineering CourseBackgroundStudents in undergraduate engineering programs often experience their first college-level team-based design project as a summative assessment in an introductory engineering course. Asnovice collaborators, first-year students frequently face
, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 29–43, 2022.[3] Ulrich, K., & Eppinger, S. (2012). Product design and development. (5th ed.). New York City: McGraw-Hill Higher Education.[4] M. Education, L. Torrez, and M. E. P. Director, ‘Comprehensive needs assessment’. New Directors orientation, 2001.[5] Berkowitz, B. & Wadud, E. (2022, July 11). Section 1. Developing a Plan for Assessing Local Needs and Resources. Community ToolBox. Retrieved from https://ctb.ku.edu/en/table-of-contents/assessment/assessing-community-needs-and- resources/develop-a-plan/main.[6] Wikin, B., Altschuld, J. (1995). Planning and conducting needs assessments: A practical guide. Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Appendix A: Needs Assessment
TinkerCAD's tools. The module includes a detailed lesson plan,student handouts, general TinkerCAD basics for students, and a slide presentation, all with linksto online resources. Aligned with Next Generation Science Standards and the InternationalSociety for Technology in Education Standards, the module can be implemented in variouscurriculum settings.In addition to the lesson module, students completed pre- and post-lesson surveys to track theirinterest in AI tools and topics. The results and experiences of both teachers and students areshared and discussed. An introduction is given, followed by a sample lesson, and an assessment.IntroductionIntroduction to ImageSTEAMRecent advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) and its subfields, such as
asproponents for gender equity and inclusivity and carry the lessons learned in training into alltheir activities across campus. Over the course of the A&A program, 47 faculty, staff, andadministrators were trained as Allies. The Advocates led round-table discussions in theirworkshops and resulting discussions indicated a disjunct in views of equity between faculty andadministration.Facilitated Peer Mentor CirclesMentoring strategic planning sessions were held for faculty by rank with members grouped into(1) Research Scientists, (2) Non-tenure track Teaching Faculty, (3) Tenure-track AssistantProfessors, (4) Associate Professors, and (5) Full Professors, Program Chairs & DepartmentHeads. These sessions engaged over 70% of campus faculty
) Grading can stimulate effort, (d)Grading allows faculty to recognize and document mastery, (e) Grading can form part ofprogram assessment activities. Also discussed the impact of grading and reminded that mostliterature finds that grading is inherently demotivating, especially for intrinsic motivation (ascontrasted with extrinsic motivation) [12], [13].What should we grade: Discussed the concept that NOT everything needs to be graded andlinked having a grading plan back to the ‘why’s’ of grading. Discussed spot grading, rotatinggrading, completion credit (with potential benefits of time efficiency, targeted feedback andimproved student focus). [14]When should we grade: Discussed grading rhythms (grading earlier in the semester is moreuseful for
, opportunities to collect data are often limited to a single shot, making explosive testshigh-stakes events, with limited room for error and significant costs associated with each test.Professionals in government, military, and industry roles must not only master the tools of thetrade but also learn to interpret the data to drive decisions. This requires more than familiaritywith instrumentation, it demands the ability to plan experiments, troubleshoot challenges, andcritically analyze outcomes. Developing these skills in a structured and safe environment, freefrom the high stakes of real-world testing, is essential for preparing students for the demands oftheir career.Distance education introduces additional challenges to learning design and
collaborative team projects. This can make it difficult for instructors to pinpoint the root causes of a student’s struggles—whether they stem from programming, mathematical concepts, or the integration of both. Designing effective assessments and providing targeted feedback require additional planning and resources. • Limited field specific knowledge of the students: Students' high school backgrounds offer little common ground due to the national and international diversity of standards. Even at the first year in college, some students excel at their college courses, and others requiring much additional study [9]. 4. Course OverviewThe "Mathematical Analysis" course at Fairfield University
● What would a “just” pay system look like in each of the four Justice in Pay organizational justice areas (distributive, procedural, informational, Processes and interpersonal)? Building ● Developing a professional development program for pay decision- Knowledge About makers Faculty Pay ● Address decision-making AND communicating decisions Communicating ● Engage communication experts Salary-Related ● Consider the audience Topics ● Plan the content ● Anticipate responses in advanceAdditional representatives could be from offices of research, finance, strategic planning andinitiatives, information technology, communications, and/or the
will contributeto refining the survey tool and guiding future interventions to promote a culture of inclusivity,collaboration, and equity in engineering education.Future WorkThe National Science Foundation grant funding supporting this work was terminated on April25, 2025. We are including the following plans for future work that were established prior to thistermination. The research team hopes to carry out these plans in some capacity and encouragesthe broader research community to develop tools for assessing cultural transformation withinengineering education. The next steps in this research involve analyzing the collected survey datato identify trends and insights regarding the dominator-to-partnership spectrum within theCollege of
program requires a student to complete a capstone study that is supervised byat least two advisors representing two different fields of study. The capstone study can be a‘creative component’ or a ‘research report’. The GC is of relatively low cost and can greatly helpstudents wishing to pursue a graduate (MS or PhD) degree in future, besides being helpful inpractice. A student is required to devise a plan of study (POS) in consultation with the two advisorsand requires a contract between the student, graduate college and the school. The graduatecertificate consists of 12 credit hours which can all be double-counted towards the undergraduatedegree.At the time of writing this article, 21 students successfully completed the GC and one student ison
also providing valuable insights to faculty and their mentors asthey plan for continued career development. Moving toward predictive models sets the stage forkey insights that are sensitive to an institutional context—in this case, the primacy ofinterdisciplinary teams for securing initial seed funding.Moving forward, BI dashboards also allow decision makers to steer pilot funding priorities toclosely track with the changing goals of federal funding agencies. By integrating key metrics,such as team strengths and applicant funding histories, a higher resolution footprint of researchimpact against particular grant funding mechanisms can be established.Finally, research administration BI dashboards facilitate continuous evaluation processes
by sequential phrases such as First, Second, and Last;similar patterns can be found in Reflections 5 and 6 (see Appendices D, E, and F).Summary of Reflection 4: All questions were predefined. Question 3 specifically required enumerated responses,facilitating structured reflection (See Appendix D for the complete transcript). Aside from Q3, the other predefined questions in Reflection 5 effectively encouragedstudents to make actionable suggestions and share their thoughts and opinions. Statements like “Iam looking forward to next week’s activity” and “Improving by planning design would save time”show a thinking and a focus on developing future methods. Reflection 5 demonstrates how thesepredefined questions can also help students
topics without using anycomputers [4]. For classrooms that normally use computers to teach and practice computerscience, CS Unplugged activities give students a break from typing at their computer and let theminteract with their classmates face-to-face. Unplugged activities also give students the opportunityto tangibly engage with computer science concepts without the distraction of an IntegratedDevelopment Environment (IDE) interface or the challenges of typing, spelling, and debugging.We take inspiration from CS Unplugged’s “Binary search trees” activity1 , which is designed forages 11-14 and is estimated to take 45 minutes [5]. CS Unplugged’s BST activity plan has theinstructor draw a BST of numbers on the ground, then cover each of the
into higher education. At the timeof writing, over 1,100 students had responded to the questionnaire, and we plan to analyze theremaining qualitative responses through the current lens. We also plan to reanalyze the initial andremaining participants with an activity theory lens, clustering based on GPA and AI use, with asecondary cluster analysis on gender. As a mixed-methods study, the full research project willalso consist of 30 semi-structured interviews, with the interview protocol derived from thequestionnaire analysis. We also plan to analyze comparisons and interactions between thequantitative and qualitative portions of the questionnaire and interview responses to providedeeper insights into how student perceptions, disruptive
assessments and encourage businesses to adopt sustainable practices. These grants reduce financial barriers and incentivize businesses to invest in sustainable solutions.Embracing a comprehensive approach, the College of Engineering at New Mexico State University(NMSU) conducts energy audits benefiting the environment and businesses together. The casestudy has assisted over 80 businesses and plans to continue improving the sustainability of NewMexico, Texas, and surrounding areas. These assessments provide a holistic review of operationalpractices, pinpointing areas for improvement and offering clear, actionable recommendations thatalign with industry best practices.Implementation of RecommendationsThere are three types of recommendations
current progress of e-REF and outlines our plans for its currentimplementation and evaluation. We describe its learning outcomes, structure, and preliminaryassessment strategies designed to measure its effectiveness in teaching literature review skills,engineering documentation, and data visualization techniques.Project Approach and Experimental Methodse-REF: Learning OutcomesIn the first-year engineering program at NC State University, we provide a project-based courseemphasizing teamwork, task management, and problem-solving. Students learn projectmanagement principles, engineering design, computer-aided design, data analysis, and prototypedevelopment and presentation. The overarching learning outcomes of this course include theability to
programs to help CUNY faculty better understand the expectations of funding agencies and write more competitive proposals. Her intensive NSF CAREER and Grants 101 bootcamps, which are open to CUNY faculty across all its colleges, have supported 21 NSF CAREER awards, and prepared over 150 faculty to submit and win awards. Linda was part of the planning committee and a presenter for NSF’s Engineering CAREER workshops for 3 years and organized a CUNY-wide Convergence Workshop in 2018 as well as Broader Impacts presentations. Linda has a PhD in Educational Psychology from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; her postdoc, through the University of Arizona, focused on art and technoscience collaborations. She
topics and activities that are part of other SEED program elements and build relationships of peer support in a community of practice environment.Training for Faculty Mentors. Faculty members who are mentoring SEED scholars participated in an eight-hour mentoring training course before they started meeting with students. This training was open to other engineering and engineering technology faculty members to expand the impact of the program and in case there would be a need for additional faculty mentors of SEED Scholars.Student Mentoring. As soon as a student is selected as a SEED scholarship recipient or guest scholar, a faculty member from the engineering major that the student is planning to pursue is assigned as their SEED