and German in 1987, and returned to academia after a 22 year engineering career in industry. During his career Dr. Hamrick served in a broad range of positions including design, product development, tool and die, manufacturing, sales, and management. His teaching style brings practical, innovative, experience based learning to the classroom, where hands on projects that reflect real world applications are valued by students. Since 1998 he has mentored and lead youth organizations including Boy Scouts, Girl Scouts, 4-H, and First Robotics, with youth ranging in ages from first grade through high school. He was named a Statler College of Engineering and Mineral Resources Outstanding Teacher for 2013-14
function of component design, economics, and renewable energy resource conditions. She received her PhD & MS in Mechanical Engineering from Georgia Tech in 2003 and 2001, respectively, and obtained a BSME from Penn State in 1999.Dr. Stephanie Cutler, Pennsylvania State University Stephanie Cutler has a Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Virginia Tech. Her dissertation explored faculty adoption of research-based instructional strategies in the statics classroom. Currently, Dr. Cutler works as an assessment and instructional support specialist with the Leonhard Center for the Enhance- ment of Engineering Education at Penn State. She aids in the educational assessment of faculty-led projects while also supporting
AC 2008-710: AN INNOVATIVE FRESHMEN ENGINEERING COURSE TOIMPROVE RETENTIONJale Tezcan, Southern Illinois University-CarbondaleJohn Nicklow, Southern Illinois University-CarbondaleJames Mathias, Southern Illinois University-CarbondaleLalit Gupta, Southern Illinois University-CarbondaleRhonda Kowalchuk, Southern Illinois University-Carbondale Page 13.182.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 An Innovative Freshmen Engineering Course to Improve RetentionAbstractAs part of a federally funded project to improve retention, the College of Engineering (COE) atSouthern Illinois University- Carbondale (SIUC) has implemented a college
2006-1310: UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS TEACHING CHILDREN: K-8OUTREACH WITHIN THE CORE ENGINEERING CURRICULUMAyyana Chakravartula, University of California-BerkeleyBarbara Ando, Lawrence Hall of ScienceCheng Li, University of California-BerkeleyShikha Gupta, University of California-BerkeleyLisa Pruitt, University of California-Berkeley Page 11.1362.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 Undergraduate Students Teaching Children: K-8 Outreach within the Core Engineering CurriculumAbstract Outreach teaching is successfully implemented as a final project in core courses at UCBerkeley within the Bioengineering and Mechanical Engineering
described by a three-pillar model. Figure 1: Three-pillar modelPraxis-oriented learning includes project and problem based learning, as well as a focus on theapplication of theories and methods learned in core engineering subjects (i.e. mathematics,mechanics, electrics). The main challenges are the coordination of the lectures with regard tocontent and timing, and lecturers’ motivation. Furthermore, project and problem basedlearning demands much more time in terms of supervision than standard lectures. Involvingstudents in industrial projects is not without risks and we have to ensure that such projects arecompleted to the satisfaction of our partners in industry.All departmental staff who teaches engineering
. Page 24.364.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Design and Implementation of a 1kW Photovoltaic System as a Training InfrastructureAbstractThe Solar Instructor Training Network (SITN) program of the South-Central Region is one ofeight nationwide regions that are funded by the U.S. Department of Energy to train instructorshow to teach implementation of solar photovoltaic systems. One of the eight regions is theSouth-Central Region led by the Energy Institute at Houston Community College-North East,collaborating with Ontility the first 3 ½ years and now Janet Hughes Solar Consulting (solarenergy training providers) and the Interstate Renewable Energy Council (IREC). The primarygoal of the project is
Session 1120 OMEN: An Online Grader for Engineering Programming Courses T.D.L. Walker, J.K. Goodman Engineering Fundamentals Division1 Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State UniversityAbstractOMEN (Online Materials Education Network) is a system developed within the EngineeringFundamentals (EF) Division at Virginia Tech for the distribution and grading of programmingprojects in courses where programming assignments are made in C++ or Fortran 90. It can beused to distribute and grade programming projects in any language that supports command linecompilation, linking, and
AC 2004-7: USING ALUMNI NETWORKING TO TEACH TECHNICALCOMMUNICATIONJulie Sharp, Vanderbilt University Page 9.1367.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2004 Session 2661 USING ALUMNI NETWORKING TO TEACH TECHNICAL COMMUNICATION Julie E. Sharp Vanderbilt UniversityAbstractThis paper reports on a pilot project integrating the Vanderbilt Engineering Alumni Council(EAC) mentoring initiative with the ES 210w Technical Communication course, a technicalcommunication class for
only compoundsthe problem of understanding and correctly applying the learned material. To add studentmotivation and increase interest in the study of kinetics, a course project has been developed atthe United States Air Force Academy using the LEGO® Mindstorms Project kit. The projectinvolves the design and construction of a race car capable of competing in both a maximumspeed as well as a hill climb competition with minimal configuration changes. Followingintroduction of the project, various homework problems were also developed and integrated intothe project to increase the hands-on design, construction, and analysis components.Experimental determination of the mass moment of inertia of wheels and axles, analytical studyof go cart dynamics
aseating and sleeping. The construction requires a basic grasp of mechanical engineering concepts,and some programming ability, but use of the kits requires no previous skills. The LEGO®s kitencourages problem solving and teamwork. The unit was piloted with a pair of volunteer interns,both rising high school seniors. The volunteers worked with the unit in seven one-hour sessions.The interns chose to put in extra time to work on their projects, demonstrating the enthusiasminspired by both the materials and the projects.Introduction Hands-on experiences are vital to stimulating the interest of college students. Nowhere isthis more true than in engineering and robotics. Students want to know what awaits them whenthey have completed their math
paper revisits this design experience andshares some thoughts regarding introduction of a consulting engineering environment into the classroomsetting for capstone design experience. Issues of interest are team selection, project load distribution withinteams, personal billable time, engineer/manufacturer interaction, permit procurement, client interactions,understanding plans, specifications, and contract documents, and presentation of the final product to theclient.IntroductionThe goal of capstone courses is to have students experience the overall design process as a whole andrealize the different components of an engineering design project. In general, the design process is aninteractive process with the client and regulatory agencies to
. Page 25.1133.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012Revitalizing US Manufacturing to Capitalize on Innovation – ThroughEducationAbstractWe find that a conventional engineering degree approach to education is not sufficient to meetthe new challenges in the ecosystem of manufacturing, design and business innovation, andproduct realization. Instead a new form of engineering education, the “Professional Masters” isrequired that takes the grounding provided by typical Bachelor of Science in engineering degreeand provides condensed, formalized, experience with systems, applications, projects, and non-technical topics to create a true professional ready to maximize their value to the company andready to use
in various ways.However, these methods may not be as important for modern students entering industry orresearch, where the ability to be clear and succinct may be vital.As part of the capstone sequence at the Milwaukee School of Engineering (MSOE), students inthe Computer Science and Software Engineering Programs are required to prepare and deliver anelevator pitch related to their project during the first term once the initial requirements have beenestablished. This pitch helps to solidify the project scope and is used as part of the continuousimprovement process for the programs.To help improve the capstone experience, a subset of elevator pitches for the programs wereevaluated by external, industrial advisory board members to provide
application equipment for seed, fertilizers,and pesticides; irrigation; yield monitors; sensors for detecting soil fertility and weedpopulations; and remote sensing imagery.This paper will report efforts to initiate “precision farming” implementation and researchat University of Maryland Eastern Shore (UMES).UMES is an 1890 land granthistorically black university and it’s mission is consistent with the goals of the endeavorwhich includes (i) integration of advanced technologies in agricultural practices at UMESwith a view to improve productivity with due emphasis on research, education andoutreach; (ii) environmental stewardship and (iii) remote observation and analysis. Whileall aspects of “Precision Agriculture” will be integrated with the project
Integration of a Local Riverbank Failure Problem in CivilEngineering Undergraduate CurriculumDr. Suguang Xiao, P.E., Clarkson UniversityMr. Robert Schneider, Clarkson UniversityMr. Erik Backus, P.E., LEED AP, Clarkson UniversityAbstractOne of the primary goals of undergraduate educators is to provide engineering students with engagingproblems to build skills needed for their careers. Project based coursework puts responsibility on thestudent to initiate self-directed learning and opportunity to apply fundamentals. Recently, with thesolicitation of the local municipality, a team of Clarkson University faculty and students volunteered inassisting a homeowner to rectify a slope failure along the St. Regis River in Brasher Falls, NY
content andtechnical content together in ways that are manageable by faculty who are not engineers. Thecourse in professional and technical writing at our college is required of all engineering andcomputer science majors and is usually taken in the junior year. The course has undergone manytransformations in content and focus since it was first developed in 1994. The latest iterationblends communication principles with technical projects that can bridge the divide and helpstudents see how the two fields are intricately intertwined in the engineering workplace.This paper reflects on the work-in-progress at Rose-Hulman focused on helping our studentsdevelop their communication skills in technical contexts. Currently five faculty are
describe the course’s desired student learningoutcomes which were developed based upon needs identified in the preparation of studentsentering the senior design experience. For previous ECE students their first exposure to manydesign concepts and tools was during their senior year course. Building key design skills andconceptual understanding via exposure to multiple small, open-ended projects that increase incomplexity through the semester during their junior spring semester will enable students to entertheir capstone course the following year in a higher state of readiness. The course providesexposure to multiple design processes prevalent in academe and industry and encouragesstudents to internalize the key steps common to nearly all
of IT or the technical side. All students taking thecourse are required to have a basic introduction to Java. The course is completely online, andstudent-teacher interaction comes primarily from Q&A discussion boards (Piazza) and one liveQ&A session per week (WebEx). The course revolves around a semester-long project in whichstudents develop a mini e-commerce web application complete with the design andimplementation of the web interface, the database, and the application business logic.In this paper, we talk about how the course evolved when the developer joined the educator toteach the course. We focus on six important facets of the experience: (1) the initial conditionsthat allowed the collaboration to be successful, (2) the
University of Ulster in Northern Ireland, M.Sc. (1995) in research methods in psychology from the University of Strathclyde in Scotland and a Ph.D. (2003) in psychology from South Bank University, London. She is currently Project Manager for the MemphiSTEP project at the University of Memphis,a project funded by the National Science Foundation, designed to increase the number of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics graduates. She is also a Co-PI on the Transforming a Civil Engineering curriculum through Geographic Information Systems Project at the University of Memphis, also funded by the National Sci- ence Foundation. Best has an extensive research background and served as lead researcher on a range of
tissues. Prior to that, he completed his PhD in Electrical Engi- neering at the University of California Berkeley and his BS in ECE at The Ohio State University. He first discovered the joys of teaching as an undergraduate TA with tOSU’s first-year engineering program, and he has been engaged with curriculum development and teaching projects ever since.Allison Connell Pensky, Carnegie Mellon University ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Work in Progress: Impact of Electronics Design Experience on Non-majors’ Self-efficacy and IdentityAbstractBefore the advent of the internet, electronics hobbyists embarked on lifelong learning journeyswith instructional books such as
Conceptual Site ModelsAbstractIn environmental engineering site remediation projects, community perception of environmentaland health risks can influence a project’s scope and design. Therefore, community engagement iscritical to shaping an engineer’s definition of an environmental problem. However, lower-levelundergraduate engineering curricula rarely address the incorporation of community input intoenvironmental engineering problem definition, as environmental engineering coursework tendsto utilize pre-defined problems to develop and assess technical knowledge and skills. Upper-level courses that do include community participation in environmental engineering design tendto be reflective, having students evaluate the social impact of a pre-defined
components of a project(e.g., purpose, theory, sampling, and instrumentation) to ensure they are compatible andappropriate to investigate the phenomenon of interest. As Slaton and Pawley (2018) note, all ofthe features of a research design must be actively chosen and each of these choices has hugeepistemic and political consequences. Unfortunately, the process of aligning these components iscomplex and enigmatic, as researchers often fail to adequately document the details of theirdecision making process for others to learn from. They are seldom incentivized to do so.Accordingly, the purpose of this paper is to divulge the complexities embedded within ourresearch team’s process of designing a qualitative study focused on understanding
elementary and middle school children (2005-2009) • Supervised 30+ design/research projects involving 83+ undergraduate students • Hosted numerous outreach programs for 2000+ pre-college students • Combustion Institute KSA Country Chap- ter founding member • Supervised three annual teams of international design exchange students from France conducting research/design at U of Iowa and Industry • Served as industry liaison between U. of Iowa and HNI Corporation for nine years • Served as a member of industry advisory board for Col- lege of Engineering at the U. of Iowa representing HNI • Reviewer for Energy and Sustainability Journal since 2010 • Developed and implemented three strategic plans to earn KSA national, ABET and
Education, and the Los Alamos National Laboratory, as well as industry organizations and partners, such as the National Masonry Concrete Association and Nucor. She served as the director of the National Science Foundation-funded Tigers ADVANCE project, which focuses on improving the status of women and minority faculty at Clemson. Previously, Dr. Atamturktur was the director of the National Science Foundation-funded National Research Traineeship project at Clemson, with funding for over 30 doctoral students and a goal of initiating a new degree program on scientific computing and data analytics for resilient infrastructure systems. In addition, Dr. Atamturktur was the director of two separate Department of Education
-enabled frequent feedback. Prior to her role and Director of Instructional Effectiveness, she worked as the Education Project Manager for the NSF-funded JTFD Engineering faculty development program, as a high school math and science teacher, and as an Assistant Principal and Instructional & Curriculum Coach.Dr. Ryan J Meuth, Arizona State University Dr. Ryan Meuth is a Freshmen Engineering Senior Lecturer in the Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering, and also teaches courses in Computer Engineering for the School of Computing, Informatics, and Decision Systems Engineering at Arizona State University.Dr. Brent James Sebold, Arizona State University Dr. Brent Sebold is an expert faculty designer and administrator of
AC 2009-2401: GEOMETRIC DESIGN OF HIGHWAY VERTICAL ANDHORIZONTAL CURVES USING EXCELBradly McNair, Indiana University-Purdue University, Fort WayneSuleiman Ashur, Indiana University-Purdue University, Fort Wayne Page 14.647.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 Geometric Design of Highway Vertical and Horizontal Curves Using ExcelAbstractThis paper presents the work that was developed as a project in the first offering of thetransportation engineering class at the new civil engineering program at Indiana University-Purdue University Fort Wayne. The project statement required the use of Excel in developing aprogram for
for Engineering Education, 2018 Making Sense of Gender Differences in the Ways Engineering Students Experience Innovation: An Abductive AnalysisIntroductionThe different experiences and outcomes for male and female students in engineering have longbeen a focus of engineering education research. In the spaces of engineering design andinnovation, researchers have explored differences in the ways male and female students approachconceptual design tasks1, their unique experiences working on a variety of engineering designprojects2,3, differences in propensity for engineering creativity4, and the innovative outcomes ofstudent projects from gender homogenous and heterogeneous teams5,6.Collectively, these and other studies suggest
others.Dr. William A Kline, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Bill Kline is Professor of Engineering Management and Associate Dean of Innovation at Rose-Hulman. His teaching and professional interests include systems engineering, quality, manufacturing systems, in- novation, and entrepreneurship. As Associate Dean, he directs the Branam and Kremer Innovation Centers which house campus competition teams, capstone projects, and a maker space. He is currently an associate with IOI Partners, a consulting venture focused on innovation tools and systems. Prior to joining Rose-Hulman, he was a company co-founder and Chief Operating Officer of Montronix, a company in the global machine monitoring industry. Bill is a Phi
recentlyestablished interdisciplinary capstone design experiences. Design experiences involvingstudents of differing engineering disciplines offer the possibility of more complex,meaningful projects and introduce traditional engineering students to the terminology andtechnology of related disciplines. At the same time, the value of undergraduates trainedin the Systems Engineering and Systems Engineering Management disciplines has beenrealized both by industry and the Department of Defense. While capstone designexperiences which involve interaction among students schooled in different engineeringand engineering technology disciplines are becoming more common, those which alsoinclude students trained in Systems Engineering and Systems Engineering Managementare
been inprogress. Workshops for Pre-K16 (P16) teachers have been organized for the dissemination ofRP and this project. A project website3 has also been developed and feedback collected via anonline poll. The scope and current development of the project will be reported in this paper.IntroductionRP is expressed as a group of techniques used to quickly produce a scale model of a part using3D computer aided design (CAD) data. The methodology behind the RP process is an additivetechnology which builds the parts layer by layer. RP was first developed in the late 1980’s. Sincethen various RP techniques have become available in the market.There are various motivations in implementing RP technology. Foremost, this technologydecreases product