describe the course’s desired student learningoutcomes which were developed based upon needs identified in the preparation of studentsentering the senior design experience. For previous ECE students their first exposure to manydesign concepts and tools was during their senior year course. Building key design skills andconceptual understanding via exposure to multiple small, open-ended projects that increase incomplexity through the semester during their junior spring semester will enable students to entertheir capstone course the following year in a higher state of readiness. The course providesexposure to multiple design processes prevalent in academe and industry and encouragesstudents to internalize the key steps common to nearly all
of IT or the technical side. All students taking thecourse are required to have a basic introduction to Java. The course is completely online, andstudent-teacher interaction comes primarily from Q&A discussion boards (Piazza) and one liveQ&A session per week (WebEx). The course revolves around a semester-long project in whichstudents develop a mini e-commerce web application complete with the design andimplementation of the web interface, the database, and the application business logic.In this paper, we talk about how the course evolved when the developer joined the educator toteach the course. We focus on six important facets of the experience: (1) the initial conditionsthat allowed the collaboration to be successful, (2) the
University of Ulster in Northern Ireland, M.Sc. (1995) in research methods in psychology from the University of Strathclyde in Scotland and a Ph.D. (2003) in psychology from South Bank University, London. She is currently Project Manager for the MemphiSTEP project at the University of Memphis,a project funded by the National Science Foundation, designed to increase the number of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics graduates. She is also a Co-PI on the Transforming a Civil Engineering curriculum through Geographic Information Systems Project at the University of Memphis, also funded by the National Sci- ence Foundation. Best has an extensive research background and served as lead researcher on a range of
Your Hand, a multidisciplinary collaboration between engineering and the artsAbstract: Raise Your Hand is an immersive, interactive sensor-driven dynamic art exhibit.Vision tracking software changes the video projections, mechatronics, and music composition inresponse to the height of a visitor’s raised arm. The 1 ½-year project brought together studentsand faculty from computer engineering, computer science, electrical engineering, industrialdesign, mechanical engineering, literature, media and communication, computational media, andmusic technology. Further, students were integrated into the project in different forms, includingcapstone design teams, Vertically Integrated Project (VIP) students, undergraduate research
tissues. Prior to that, he completed his PhD in Electrical Engi- neering at the University of California Berkeley and his BS in ECE at The Ohio State University. He first discovered the joys of teaching as an undergraduate TA with tOSU’s first-year engineering program, and he has been engaged with curriculum development and teaching projects ever since.Allison Connell Pensky, Carnegie Mellon University ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Work in Progress: Impact of Electronics Design Experience on Non-majors’ Self-efficacy and IdentityAbstractBefore the advent of the internet, electronics hobbyists embarked on lifelong learning journeyswith instructional books such as
Conceptual Site ModelsAbstractIn environmental engineering site remediation projects, community perception of environmentaland health risks can influence a project’s scope and design. Therefore, community engagement iscritical to shaping an engineer’s definition of an environmental problem. However, lower-levelundergraduate engineering curricula rarely address the incorporation of community input intoenvironmental engineering problem definition, as environmental engineering coursework tendsto utilize pre-defined problems to develop and assess technical knowledge and skills. Upper-level courses that do include community participation in environmental engineering design tendto be reflective, having students evaluate the social impact of a pre-defined
components of a project(e.g., purpose, theory, sampling, and instrumentation) to ensure they are compatible andappropriate to investigate the phenomenon of interest. As Slaton and Pawley (2018) note, all ofthe features of a research design must be actively chosen and each of these choices has hugeepistemic and political consequences. Unfortunately, the process of aligning these components iscomplex and enigmatic, as researchers often fail to adequately document the details of theirdecision making process for others to learn from. They are seldom incentivized to do so.Accordingly, the purpose of this paper is to divulge the complexities embedded within ourresearch team’s process of designing a qualitative study focused on understanding
elementary and middle school children (2005-2009) • Supervised 30+ design/research projects involving 83+ undergraduate students • Hosted numerous outreach programs for 2000+ pre-college students • Combustion Institute KSA Country Chap- ter founding member • Supervised three annual teams of international design exchange students from France conducting research/design at U of Iowa and Industry • Served as industry liaison between U. of Iowa and HNI Corporation for nine years • Served as a member of industry advisory board for Col- lege of Engineering at the U. of Iowa representing HNI • Reviewer for Energy and Sustainability Journal since 2010 • Developed and implemented three strategic plans to earn KSA national, ABET and
Education, and the Los Alamos National Laboratory, as well as industry organizations and partners, such as the National Masonry Concrete Association and Nucor. She served as the director of the National Science Foundation-funded Tigers ADVANCE project, which focuses on improving the status of women and minority faculty at Clemson. Previously, Dr. Atamturktur was the director of the National Science Foundation-funded National Research Traineeship project at Clemson, with funding for over 30 doctoral students and a goal of initiating a new degree program on scientific computing and data analytics for resilient infrastructure systems. In addition, Dr. Atamturktur was the director of two separate Department of Education
-enabled frequent feedback. Prior to her role and Director of Instructional Effectiveness, she worked as the Education Project Manager for the NSF-funded JTFD Engineering faculty development program, as a high school math and science teacher, and as an Assistant Principal and Instructional & Curriculum Coach.Dr. Ryan J Meuth, Arizona State University Dr. Ryan Meuth is a Freshmen Engineering Senior Lecturer in the Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering, and also teaches courses in Computer Engineering for the School of Computing, Informatics, and Decision Systems Engineering at Arizona State University.Dr. Brent James Sebold, Arizona State University Dr. Brent Sebold is an expert faculty designer and administrator of
AC 2009-2401: GEOMETRIC DESIGN OF HIGHWAY VERTICAL ANDHORIZONTAL CURVES USING EXCELBradly McNair, Indiana University-Purdue University, Fort WayneSuleiman Ashur, Indiana University-Purdue University, Fort Wayne Page 14.647.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 Geometric Design of Highway Vertical and Horizontal Curves Using ExcelAbstractThis paper presents the work that was developed as a project in the first offering of thetransportation engineering class at the new civil engineering program at Indiana University-Purdue University Fort Wayne. The project statement required the use of Excel in developing aprogram for
for Engineering Education, 2018 Making Sense of Gender Differences in the Ways Engineering Students Experience Innovation: An Abductive AnalysisIntroductionThe different experiences and outcomes for male and female students in engineering have longbeen a focus of engineering education research. In the spaces of engineering design andinnovation, researchers have explored differences in the ways male and female students approachconceptual design tasks1, their unique experiences working on a variety of engineering designprojects2,3, differences in propensity for engineering creativity4, and the innovative outcomes ofstudent projects from gender homogenous and heterogeneous teams5,6.Collectively, these and other studies suggest
others.Dr. William A Kline, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Bill Kline is Professor of Engineering Management and Associate Dean of Innovation at Rose-Hulman. His teaching and professional interests include systems engineering, quality, manufacturing systems, in- novation, and entrepreneurship. As Associate Dean, he directs the Branam and Kremer Innovation Centers which house campus competition teams, capstone projects, and a maker space. He is currently an associate with IOI Partners, a consulting venture focused on innovation tools and systems. Prior to joining Rose-Hulman, he was a company co-founder and Chief Operating Officer of Montronix, a company in the global machine monitoring industry. Bill is a Phi
recentlyestablished interdisciplinary capstone design experiences. Design experiences involvingstudents of differing engineering disciplines offer the possibility of more complex,meaningful projects and introduce traditional engineering students to the terminology andtechnology of related disciplines. At the same time, the value of undergraduates trainedin the Systems Engineering and Systems Engineering Management disciplines has beenrealized both by industry and the Department of Defense. While capstone designexperiences which involve interaction among students schooled in different engineeringand engineering technology disciplines are becoming more common, those which alsoinclude students trained in Systems Engineering and Systems Engineering Managementare
been inprogress. Workshops for Pre-K16 (P16) teachers have been organized for the dissemination ofRP and this project. A project website3 has also been developed and feedback collected via anonline poll. The scope and current development of the project will be reported in this paper.IntroductionRP is expressed as a group of techniques used to quickly produce a scale model of a part using3D computer aided design (CAD) data. The methodology behind the RP process is an additivetechnology which builds the parts layer by layer. RP was first developed in the late 1980’s. Sincethen various RP techniques have become available in the market.There are various motivations in implementing RP technology. Foremost, this technologydecreases product
return to graduate school. She teaches design and entrepreneurship courses at the undergraduate and graduate levels. Her work is often cross-disciplinary, collaborating with colleagues from engineering, education, psychology, and industrial design.Prof. Seda Yilmaz, Iowa State UniversityDr. Daniel Knight, University of Colorado, Boulder Dr. Daniel Knight is the Program Assessment and Research Associate with the Design Center Colorado in the Department of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering and Applied Science at University of Colorado Boulder. Dr. Knight’s duties include assessment, program evaluation, education research, and teambuilding for the Center’s hands-on, industry-sponsored design projects. Dr
consulting for topics including forecasting, inventory management, production planning, project management, and supply chain management. His research interests are in improving supply chain efficiency through the application of technology and best practices for warehousing, logistics, and inventory management. He holds a B.S. and Master of Engineering degree from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, and a Ph.D. in Technology Management from Indiana State University. He also holds professional certifications of CPIM and CSCP from APICS, The Association for Operations Management, and a PMP from the Project Management Institute.Mr. John Pickard, East Carolina University I am a teaching instructor at East Carolina University in
undergraduatecurriculum, and address pressing societal needs. In recent years, spurred by the decliningcondition of the environment, engineering educators have begun to incorporate concepts of greenengineering and sustainability into undergraduate education. Through the perspectives ofundergraduate students who are enrolled in the newly developed, environmentally consciouscurriculum of Rowan University’s College of Engineering, early experiences in engineeringeducation will be showcased.The hallmark of Rowan University’s Engineering program is its Engineering Clinic: a requiredeight-semester sequence for engineering majors that brings real-world engineering into theclassroom through interdisciplinary, project-based learning. Undergraduate students are engagedin
Paper ID #37005Best Practices in Building Relationships and PartnershipsBetween Community Colleges, Universities, andOrganizations (Work In Progress)Vibhasri Davuluri Vibhasri (Vibha) Davuluri is a second-year undergraduate student at the University of Michigan pursuing a B.S. in Industrial and Operations Engineering with a sustainability certification. Her interests include research in engineering education, and sustainability in engineering and healthcare. At the University of Michigan, Vibha is heavily involved in Society of Women Engineers (SWE), and Project MESA (Making Examinations Safe and Accesible for All
hands-on service projects. The school created adynamic model for introducing projects that allow students to learn about different types ofSTEM-related fields, such as manufacturing, architecture, construction, engineering, science,technology, and more. The competency-based model provides an opportunity for educators tointroduce projects to students at an early stage in their careers in an effort to help them develop apassion for a particular field. These projects can also help students make early choices anddecisions about their future career aspirations. The research shows that the competency-basedmodel supports students in learning and developing valuable skills such as collaboration, creativethinking and critical analysis, problem solving
Wisconsin-Platteville, the Measurement and Instrumentation course coversthe design and development of products containing multiple sensors and actuators. Students inthis course work in teams to collaboratively develop these products. While each team member isresponsible for their individual parts of the project, the integration of these parts requires asignificant amount of teamwork. In this study, we propose indirect evaluations of teamwork byassessing the functionality and quality of the product, team presentation, and project report. Weinvestigated 9 final projects involving 31 students and compared the indirect team evaluationwith peer evaluations. The details of our findings will be discussed. Based on our findings, weconclude that peer
approachI. AbstractMATLAB programming projects are assigned in the Vanderbilt University IntroductoryBiomechanics course to strengthen coding skill and demonstrate application of theory topractice. In course evaluations, students consistently rate these projects as the most challengingand difficult to grasp, citing the inefficacy of the traditional (lecture-only) course in mergingprogramming with biomechanics content. Moving material online is an intuitive solution to thiscomputation-based instructional challenge. Literature has shown that blended classes (30-80%online) can improve academic performance compared to in-person or online classes alone. Whilevery few studies have analyzed blended learning in biomedical engineering contexts, research
accreditingagency for both 4-year bachelor’s degree programs and two-year associate degree programs inconstruction, construction science, construction management, and construction technology. [16]Currently, there are 72 four-year bachelor's, five master's, and 13 associate degree programsaccredited by ACCE [17].ACCE lists the following learning outcomes for the bachelor degree programs in section 3.1.5 ofthe Standards and Criteria for the Accreditation of Bachelor’s Degree Construction EducationPrograms (ACCE Document 103B) [18]: 1. Create written communications appropriate to the construction discipline. 2. Create oral presentations appropriate to the construction discipline. 3. Create a construction project safety plan. 4. Create construction
within a freshmanengineering design course in which students are asked to conceive, design,implement and operate a Six-Section Rube Goldberg machine. Often in the firstyear of an engineering curriculum there is a project based class designed tointroduce students to, motivate students about, and retain students within theengineering discipline. They also begin to instill skills such as: 1. Team Work 2. Systems Engineering through Experimentation, Testing, and CAD & physical Modeling 3. Written Communication 4. Oral Communication 5. Time Management 6. Team ManagementAt this institution, project based classes allow students to develop these skills andexpressly enforces two avenues of technical communication: between and
University of Cluj-Napoca, Electrical and Computer Engineering Department at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology, Terre Haute, Indiana and R@D engi- neer for The Institute of Scientific Research for Automation and Telecommunications, Bucharest Roma- nia. Over the past ten years she taught several undergraduate and graduate courses on Electronic Compo- nents and Circuits, Digital Design, Design of Fault Tolerant Systems and Testing of Digital Systems. Her current research interest includes Reliability and Fault Tolerance of Electronic Systems, Programmable Logic Devices and new educational methods teaching digital system design and analog electronics, em- phasizing ”hands-on” experiences and project-based-learning. She has
roles: clients, architects, and developers. So, we let the teams changeroles during the course. That is, for each project one team played the role of architects, whileother teams played the roles of clients and developers. Student teams rotated roles on differentprojects throughout the term. A further variation in cooperative learning is that, to succeed oneach project, three different teams also had to cooperate.These innovations kept the benefits of cooperative learning while also exposing the students to 3different perspectives as they progressed through their projects. This is especially important forsoftware architecture, where the 3 perspectives must always be kept in mind. An additionalbenefit was that each student participated in 3
opportunity to seethree-dimensional deformation, develop a feel for forces in materials, and experience some of theways that the building process influences planning and design decision-making. It is believedthat these projects are adaptable to a range of architectural engineering courses and topics.IntroductionEngineering and architecture faculty employ a wide variety of assignments to simulate theexperience of designing and constructing buildings. Most often these are small models orsegments of the process, but some1 attempt the construction of entire structures. The centralobjectives of these projects are (1) To help students synthesize and attach physical meaning tothe qualitative and quantitative elements of their academic coursework and (2) To
an Assistant Professor of Writing Arts at Rowan University and has been a part of Rowan’s Sophomore Clinic team since 1998. She received her Ph.D. from the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee. Page 11.281.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 BOTTLE ROCKETS AND PARAMETRIC DESIGN IN A DIVERGING-CONVERGING DESIGN STRATEGYAbstractThe Sophomore Engineering Clinic covers two semesters in an eight-semester design sequence.The course integrates engineering with writing and public speaking. In the past the course hasused two semester-long design projects to teach design through a series of
2006-710: A MODEL FOR PREPARING THE NSF CAREER PROPOSALGarrick Louis, University of Virginia Garrick E. Louis is an Associate Professor of Systems & Information Engineering at the University of Virginia. He also holds a courtesy appointment in Civil and Environmental Engineering. His research interests include engineering for developing communities and sustainable infrastructure, particularly the development of policies and programs to assure sustained access to infrastructure-related services in the face of routine, and low-probability high-consequence interruptions from natural and deliberate man-made sources. Garrick’s projects include community-based water, sanitation and
, Mathematics & Statistics Department2 1 Edwardsville, IL 62026AbstractThis Evidence-based practice complete paper describes the experiences with a holisticMathematics Enrichment Sessions, Freshmen Mentoring, Mathematics Tutoring and newFreshmen Engineering course that are implemented during the last five years at Southern IllinoisUniversity Edwardsville as part of our NSF STEP project. The mathematics Enrichment Session(ES) idea, which is a combination of the best aspects of Supplemental Instruction idea andPeerLed Team Learning methods, can be an effective way of supporting students in their firstyear of studies. The implementation of the peer-mentoring program that was