Faculty in Science and Engineering. The National Academies Press. Washington, D.C.[18] Ministry of Women’s Affairs. (2012). Does Gender Matter? Ministry of Women’s Affairs, Wellington, New Zealand.[19] Bozeman, B., & Corley, E. (2004). Scientists’ collaboration strategies: Implications for scientific and technical human capital. Research Policy, 33(4), 599–616.[20] MBIE. 2016. Unlocking Curious Minds. Retrieved 15 February, 2016 from http://www.curiousminds.nz/discover/article/4/30/unlocking-curious-minds[21] Chompalov, I., Genuth, J., & Shrum, W. (2002). The organization of scientific collaborations. Research Policy, 31(5), 749–767.
Paper ID #30699Student Perceptions of and Learning in Makerspaces Embedded in theirUndergraduate Engineering Preparation ProgramsDr. Louis S. Nadelson, University of Central Arkansas Louis S. Nadelson has a BS from Colorado State University, a BA from the Evergreen State College, a MEd from Western Washington University, and a PhD in educational psychology from UNLV. His scholarly interests include all areas of STEM teaching and learning, inservice and preservice teacher pro- fessional development, program evaluation, multidisciplinary research, and conceptual change. Nadelson uses his over 20 years of high school and
foreseeable future and can develop a history of the reconstructionas it is used.These are the very broad public policy issues that ran through the instructors’ minds as we ranour classes, despite our lack of a form approach to policy 1. How hard is it to design a socio-technical system for New Orleans that would be safe? What could first year engineers do to understand the problems and redesign New Orleans. Insofar as they succeed, the implications are that the considerable levels of complexity and technological difficulty are not the issue. 2. Is the image of a devastated New Orleans coupled with poor design, poor planning and a hapless response a public policy issue for engineering in the United States. How inept and
conversations. Science Education, 94 (3), 478-505. 13. Barseghian, T. (2011, March 10). Where does informal learning fit in? [Blog post]. Mind/Shift, 3/10/11. Retrieved March 21, 2011 at http://mindshift.kqed.org/2011/03/where-doesinformal-learning-fit-in/ 14. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. 15. Rogoff, B. (2003). The cultural nature of human development. New York: Oxford University Press. 16. Tate, E., and Linn, M.C. (2005). How does identity shape the experiences of women of color engineering students? Journal of Science Education and Technology, 14(5-6), 483-493. 17. Shaffer, D. W. (2004). Epistemic Frames and
Paper ID #6230A Hands-On, Active Learning Approach to Increasing Manufacturing Knowl-edge in Engineering StudentsDr. Jay R. Goldberg P.E., Marquette University Jay R. Goldberg, Ph.D, P. E. is a Clinical Associate Professor of Biomedical Engineering at Marquette University, and Director of the Healthcare Technologies Management program at Marquette University and the Medical College of Wisconsin (Milwaukee). He teaches courses involving project management, new product development, and medical device design. His experience includes development of new prod- ucts in urology, orthopedics, GI, and dentistry. Dr. Goldberg
define problem-solving as “the cognitive process directed atachieving a goal when no solution is obvious to the problem solver (p. 287). xvi” This definitionsuggests that problem-solving has four characteristics. Problem-solving is 1) cognitive (i.e., it isan internal process that occurs in the person’s mind), 2) process-oriented (the manipulation ofknowledge), 3) goal-directed (i.e., the process is guided by the person’s goals), and 4) personal(dependent on the person’s skills and knowledge). According to Donald xvii, the problem-solvingprocess in engineering involves the following thinking skills: a) Breaking down complex problems to simpler ones b) Appling fundamentals to new problems
Paper ID #9964Development of student motivation in a required Electrical Engineering (EE)course for non-EE majorsDr. Alexander Ganago, University of MichiganSudarshan Sivaramakrishnan, University of MichiganMr. Robert Matthew DeMonbrun, University of Michigan Matt DeMonbrun is a Ph.D. Student with the Center for the Study of Higher and Postsecondary Education at the University of Michigan concentrating in Academic Affairs and Student Development. He currently serves as a Graduate Student Research Assistant with the Wabash National Study of Liberal Arts Educa- tion at the Center. Matt has previously presented on topics such
the "Brain Programs" in Hall's book, which are techniques forovercoming preconceived ideas and stimulating creative thought. 14 Examples of theseBrain Programs include the Mind Dumpster, a “brain purge program,” the Stimuli Two-Step, which stimulates ideas through analogy, and Hitchhiking, a method of travelingbetween and connecting ideas. Dekker's class has received overwhelmingly positivereviews; participants appreciate its informal and collaborative nature, as well as theapplicability of the educational concepts to future problem solving tasks. The Systems and Software Engineering curriculum at Penn State’s School forGraduate Professional Studies includes a creative problem-solving course titled“Creativity, Innovation and Change
#### Beyond Learning Styles: Understanding the Learning Processes of Engineering Students through the Interactive Learning Model™ Roberta Harvey Rowan University, Glassboro, NJAbstract: Many engineering educators have noted that engineering students present somedistinctive challenges in the classroom. In an effort to develop teaching strategies that moreeffectively reach these students, engineering educators have made use of the concept of learningstyles. However, while useful, learning styles approaches are
EH 101 sections of solely or primarily engineering students might encourage the Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright ©2003, American Society for Engineering EducationEnglish instructors to teach more “practical skills,” or what Barbara E. Walvoord and others havereferred to as the common themes or principles of WAC: • enhancing students’ high-order thinking or habits of mind; • making students more active learners; • evaluating student work more effectively.1Faculty from all four disciplines who were teaching the same cohort of students met weekly.These meetings consisted of brainstorming strategies for cross
important, in terms of ethics, to ultimately include consideration of all stakeholders, not just of stockholders. Page 8.896.9Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & 9Exposition Copyright © 2003, American Society for Engineering EducationWhat would it mean if through the means of bio and nanotechnology, humans no longerhave to succumb to bodily aging and malfunctions that result from disease anddeterioration of living tissue? Or, if our minds were less limited by the materiality of thebody? Aren’t these among the goals of current research? Such breakthroughs of sciencecould, perhaps
Engineering EducationC. Developing a Program in Mechanical Engineering in Concert with the IACEstablishing any new academic program requires a broad view and an open mind by the directoror coordinator of the program. The first step is to identify and accurately define the challengesthat exist, and must be met and overcome. Input from numerous resources is an absolutenecessity. These resources include the faculty, administration, and trustees of the institution;one’s network of colleagues from past experiences; access to similar programs at otherinstitutions (by either descriptive materials, Internet, or actual visits) as well as candiddiscussions with the heads of these programs; marketing research data; and above all, open andactive communications
technologies. The argument for a civic-minded engineer will seem very familiar tothose of us who have been working in the field of engineering education. As a result of thedemands of The Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology’s Engineering Criteria2000, engineering faculty know that if they wish their programs to remain accredited, they mustgraduate students who possess “an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility” (f),as well as “the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solut ions in aglobal and societal context” (h) and (g) “an ability to communicate effectively”.2 Theseattributes resemble the very same that Lane proposes. Engineering curricular revision representsa movement toward instilling
within containers the size of anordinary 12-ounce soda can1.There are three pedagogical aspects to the Scorpio project: first, to teach the systems engineeringmethodology; second, to teach mechanics and dynamics involved in building and launching aspacecraft; and third, to teach students to work in a team environment towards a common goal. Thiseducational model is drastically different from the typical lecture, homework, and exam courseformat, in which students must compete against one another for their grades.This paper is organized as follows. In Section II, the systems engineering methodology is described,with spacecraft applications in mind. In Section III, the first build of the Scorpio project, ScorpioAlpha, is described. Section IV
Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2001, American Society for Engineering Educationlater ability to apply their knowledge in novel situations, and is more like the knowledge possessedby expert problem-solvers 10.Finally, we wish emphasize the role technology plays in our instructional environment. In the end,the challenge we designed was untenable without technology. The kinds of learning conversationswe hoped this challenge to foster within a learner’s own mind or among learners would not havebeen possible without the computer technology to provide the appropriate experimental spacewithin which learners could explore their ideas11. This is a view of
. However, for students in Aerospace, Biological, Civil, andMechanical Engineering, this is the fundamental course on which many of the higher levelcourses are based.With this constituency in mind, the CIMS for Statics were developed as part of a larger Internetbased system known as the Virtual Laboratory for the Study of Mechanics (VLSM). The CIMSfor Statics consist of five separate modules with each focusing on a particular set of topics taughtin the course. The titles of the five modules are as follows: Concurrent Force Systems; Non-Concurrent Force Systems; Trusses, Frames and Machines; Friction; and Geometric Propertiesof Shapes. Although all modules have elements that can help with demonstration of concepts “Proceedings of the 2001 American
to population distribution in enrollment, academicperformance, and graduation rates of all groups at each level.” With this objective in mind, thegoal of the proposed recruiting methods is to increase the female enrollment in SystemsEngineering (without decreasing the male enrollment) to achieve the same representation of maleand female students in Systems Engineering as in the student body at USNA. “Equalrepresentation” in the sense defined above has not been achieved at the national level or at USNA.It should be noted that achieving equal representation implies an overall increase in engineeringstudents as female students are drawn from other fields of study. In this section, enrollment datafrom USNA and peer institutions are used to
motivationand transfer had to be reframed for this context. To ensure elementary students could access thenarrative, the readability level of sentences in the text was modified to a 5th-grade level. Thechange allows elementary students to immerse themselves in the situation better, a key of themotivation component. The intended purpose of the transfer component is to support the learnerin using the skills in other engineering situations. For younger learners to transfer engineeringpractices and skills to another situation requires engaging in multiple experiences [34]. Thedesigned case is standalone; therefore, the transfer component was excluded.The preliminary case study was developed with four dimensions in mind: problem-scoping,persuasive
engineering activity were seen as entrepreneurial activities by the students (Table2). When asked to describe specific examples of how their ability to explore multiple solutionpaths increased from the class, a larger percentage of students in the control group cited thewater filter activity compared to the experimental group. The design sprint activity did show upas a higher percentage of respondents when asked to describe a specific example to createsolutions that met customer needs compared to the water filter activity. The control groupparticipated in an activity that, while not designed with the EM in mind, did make connectionsfor students. Although not intended, both activities (design sprint and water filter activity) had animpact on student’s
belonging inengineering. The study found that classroom inclusion was the only significant predictor ofbelonging and could predict it positively to a moderate degree. Further, it was found that studentsin revised inclusive courses reported significantly stronger feelings of inclusion and belongingthan their peers in traditional courses. These findings suggest that systematic efforts toimplement neuroinclusive learning practices in engineering education may contribute to a senseof belonging for all students.IntroductionThe concept of neurodiversity, a term coined by sociologist Judy Singer [1], emerged asmembers of the autistic community challenged the predominant disability framing of autism andembraced the notion that diversity of minds is both
use of impromptudesign exercises across the engineering curriculum. The paper concludes by describing a pilotstudy on impromptu design exercises being conducted by the authors.1. Mind the gapThe call for more design experience in engineering curricula draws attention to a problem indesign education that engineering educators have noted for quite some time. Traditionalengineering programs lack curricular coherence when it comes to design. Students typicallyhave design experiences during introductory coursework (or “cornerstone” courses2) as freshmenand then again later as seniors during capstone projects or seminars. Thus, design experiencescomprise disjointed bookends in students‟ college careers. Their sophomore and junior years aredevoted
, Dimensions and Units2. Electrical Concepts and Components3. Digital Systems4. Electrical Engineering Tools and Communication Systems5. Fiber Optics6. Electronics7. Power Systems8. National Electrical Code9. Data Analysis10. Computer Engineering11. Ethical Issues in EngineeringA main consideration while preparing these topics was that the focus of the course was not tomake the students understand all the details from each topic. Instead, the objective was to exposethe students to these topics by keeping in mind that most of them do not have knowledge oncalculus and differential equations. Based on the amount of exposure that the student will receiveon each of the topics, either two
AC 2011-2229: BRINGING SMART MATERIALS APPLICATIONS INTOA PROJECT-BASED FIRST-YEAR ENGINEERING COURSEKristi J Shryock, Texas A&M University Kristi J. Shryock is a Lecturer and Director of Undergraduate Programs in the Department of Aerospace Engineering at Texas A&M University. She received both a B.S. and M.S. in Aerospace Engineering from Texas A&M and received her Ph.D. in Interdisciplinary Engineering at Texas A&M in May 2011. Her research work focuses on engineering education.Dr. Kaushik Das, Department of Aerospace Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TXStephen Oehler, Texas A&M UniversityJacques C. Richard, Texas A&M UniversityDr. Dimitris C. Lagoudas, Texas A&M
was created with two primary goals in mind. First, it was important to design thecourse in such a way that the students could see the relevance of their previous course work byproviding an opportunity to apply that core knowledge to solving an engaging problem, andsecond, the course must teach the students some of the fundamentals of systems engineering byshowing them how to decompose complex problems into a series of manageable steps. Withthese primary goals in mind, we conceived of an ECE Design course that would: ≠ Require students to apply material from their core ECE courses, ≠ Require material from at least one advanced core courses (since the core sequence requires 4 out of 5 available slots in a typical
for Engineering Education (ASEE) Conference and Exposition Proceedings, Session 3253, pp. 2363-2365.20. Siegler, R. (1991). Piaget’s Theory on Development, In Children’s Thinking, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, pp. 21-61.21. Swan, C., T. Rachell, and K. Sakaguchi (2000). Community-based, service learning approach to teaching site remediation design, American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Conference and Exposition Proceedings, June, St. Louis, MO.22. Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Interaction between learning and development, in L.S. Vygotsky, Mind and Society: The development of higher psychological processes, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 70-91.23. Vygotsky, L.S. (1986). The development of
Paper ID #9624Perspectives on Failure in the Classroom by Elementary Teachers New toTeaching EngineeringDr. Pamela S. Lottero-Perdue, Towson University Pamela S. Lottero-Perdue, Ph.D., is Associate Professor of Science Education in the Department of Physics, Astronomy & Geosciences at Towson University. She has a bachelor’s degree in mechanical engineering, worked briefly as a process engineer, and taught high school physics and pre-engineering. She has taught engineering and science to children in multiple informal settings. As a pre-service teacher educator, she includes engineering in her elementary and early
Paper ID #9381Student Perceptions of Inverted Classroom Benefits in a First-Year Engineer-ing CourseDr. Krista M. Kecskemety, Ohio State University Krista Kecskemety is a lecturer in the Engineering Education Innovation Center at The Ohio State Univer- sity. Krista received her B.S. in Aerospace Engineering at The Ohio State University in 2006 and received her M.S. from Ohio State in 2007. In 2012, Krista completed her Ph.D. in Aerospace Engineering at Ohio State. Her engineering education research interests include investigating first-year engineering student experiences, faculty experiences, and the connection between
Society for Engineering Education, 2024 2024 ASEE Midwest Section Conference and so it's not like, I put my dream all the way aside. My number one goal is to become a dentist. But as of right now, I would say my goal is to be financially stable. My parents made this big sacrifice to come here and leave everything they have. So I feel like I can make a little sacrifice to just pursue a career where I can get on my feet and make a little bit. Have a job that's guaranteed right after college. And then from there, I don't mind working on what I want to pursue.Participant 12’s story reflects external, Utility-based factors for choosing engineering. They arefocused on the financial stability
learning goals for pre-college engineering are stillbeing contested. One argument, which is promoted in science standards, is that engineeringdesign provides an authentic context to apply science concepts [4] [5] [6]. However, others arguethat this represents too narrow a view of engineering and promotes misconceptions [7] [8]. Inresponse to these concerns, the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) andAdvancing Excellence in P12 Engineering Education introduced a Framework for P-12Engineering Learning [9]. This framework outlines learning goals for engineering literacy thatmove beyond a narrow focus on practices, including engineering habits of mind and knowledge.In addition, the authors call for further research to scaffold learning
Paper ID #43856Faculty and Administrators’ Servingness in Engineering Education at HispanicServing Institutions: A Systematic ReviewDr. Hyun Kyoung Ro, University of North Texas Dr. Hyun Kyoung (Hyunny) Ro, Associate Professor of Counseling and Higher Education at the University of North Texas, holds a Ph.D. in Higher Education from The Pennsylvania State University with a minor in Educational Psychology—Applied Measurement. Her research focuses on Gender and Racial Equity in STEM Education, Learning Experiences and Outcomes for Marginalized Students, and Critical Quantitative Research and Assessment.Shirley Anderson