studies [1, 2] have examined the impact of academic accommodations on theacademic success of STEM students, revealing a rapid increase in the number of students withdisabilities attending post-secondary institutions in recent years. Educational equity is key tomeeting students’ needs while having access to all the resources, so one may effectively reachtheir full potential. One study [4] investigated the experiences of STEM students withdisabilities at a large research university in the United States. This study found that studentswho received academic accommodations, such as extended time on exams and access toassistive technology, were more likely to persist in their studies and achieve academic successthan those who did not receive
academic performance (dependentvariables), we performed an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) on the experimental data,controlling for student attributes. We found that the attendance and interaction between SAT-Math and attendance were the two terms that influenced the homework scores the most.IntroductionIn courses in science and engineering, ancillary learning opportunities outside the classroom cantake different forms. Currently, two popular ancillary approaches are peer-led team learning(PLTL) and supplemental instruction (SI). In a PLTL session, students solve problems as agroup that is led by a peer leader who is not normally a subject matter expert (SME), whereas anSI session is led by an SME.1 In both types of sessions, students learn how to
is weak, they struggle to relate to new concepts taught in theclassrooms. This is a progressive process as the new concepts they learn one day might be thepre-requisite for a later concept in the same course or later in a higher-level course. In order tounderstand this, the following research questions are investigated. (1) Do pre-requisite concepts (from a pre-requisite course) play any role in a student’s understanding of a new concept? (2) Within the same course, how well do our students make connections between the related concepts? (3) To what extent can students learn a higher-level engineering concept without a proper understanding of mathematical concepts (both basic and advanced)? (4) How well can our
properties could be determined using testing procedures described inthe American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) standards. One such standard isdesignated D-638-14, titled “Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of Plastics,” whichstates that “test specimens shall be prepared by machining operations, or die cutting, frommaterials in sheet, plate, slab, or similar form. Specimens can also be prepared by molding thematerial to be tested.” Missing from the list of test specimen preparation methods are 3D-pritingtechniques. In this study, students prepared test specimens of Acrylonitrile-Butadiene-Styrene(ABS) plastic material by 3D-printing according to ASTM D638 Type 1 specimenspecifications. These test specimens were compared to
map ABET student outcomes and supervisor surveymetrics. The correlation between the outcomes and expectations of employers will be determinedand gaged based on the data collected over a span of few years.IntroductionThis Engineering Department offers three different internships through ENGR 4900 (3 credits),ENGR 4901 (1 credit), and ENGR 4902 (2 credits) Engineering Practice courses. A student hasto take either ENGR 4900 or a combination of ENGR 4901 and 4902. This is not a very commonoccurrence, usually internship is an optional element of the curriculum1,2,3. Student’s choice isusually determined by the flat tuition threshold of 18 credits per semester. For example, if thestudent has 1 credit space in their schedule or registered for 17
toconduct research while integrating theory, knowledge and skills to develop a solution to adefined problem.1 Engineering instruction integrates well into problem based learning, allowingstudents real world problem solving experience in a classroom setting. It has been utilized inmaterials courses to examine material strengths and in mechanical engineering courses toexamine system behavior and fluid dynamics.2,3 It has been utilized in chemistry instrumentationlaboratories built around medical case analysis of drug analysis and quality controls inbreweries.4 With its increasing use, students have benefit from the engaging scenarios, wherelearning gains have been found to be twice that of a traditional classroom setting.5 In addition to problem
in comparisonto traditional lecture?To address this gap, the teaching team implemented a module using 20 borrowed Quest 1 VRheadsets. During the module, students explored and reflected upon the challenges of VRadoption in education. After students completed an initial onboarding, each week focused on adifferent learning topic. In Week 1, students explored the Iceberg Model, followed by Creativityand Innovation in Immersive Technology in Week 2. In Week 3, the module concluded withGamification for Increased Quality and Productivity. After the three weeks of topics (exploredvia VR and lecture), the final week was a project week. Students received traditional PowerPointlectures and immersive VR experiences for each topic, enabling them to
identifiedimpactful outreach approaches, including connecting with student organizations to more directlyreach underrepresented populations, create programming, and build relationships. Findings alsoallowed for the development of system-wide learning materials and interventions optimized toreach this student group.Introduction Libraries are essential for student success, contributing to both academic achievementand feelings of belonging on campus – key factors in retention and post-graduate outcomes.Despite longstanding efforts to increase diversity in STEM fields, computer science andengineering programs contain proportionally fewer women than other STEM fields, both inengineering programs [1] and in professional roles [2]. Researchers sought
development activities with anindustry focus were most effective. We conclude the paper by identifying practical andtheoretical implications for engineering educators, student life professionals, engineering deansand student engagement researchers.Context: Engineering leadership education reformNorth American faculties of engineering have been encouraged by national academies andaccreditation boards to integrate leadership development into their programing since the mid2000s 1-6. The US-based National Academy of Engineering (NAE) published a call for educationreform in 2004—The Engineer of 2020, which encouraged engineering educators to complementtheir strong technical curricula with professional skills development 4. Five years later,Engineers
continue to be under-represented infaculties of engineering and engineering workplaces [1-4], a disparity that intensifies at eachstage of an engineers’ career [5, 6]. Our primary objective in this paper is to examine anunexpected finding emerging from our study of engineering leadership—the significant over-representation of men in engineers’ identification of exemplary leaders. We explore twopossible explanations for this finding—individual women’s disinterest in leadership andstructural constraints limiting their rise. We use a post-hoc statistical analysis to examine theformer and a focused literature review to generate hypotheses about the latter.MethodologyData for this paper was drawn from larger study on engineering leadership driven by
. The goal was to engage online students as well as onsite students inthe multidisciplinary course content that included mechanical engineering, electrical engineering,and thermodynamics. Analysis showed that the multidisciplinary course was very successfulsince the average teaching assessment scores (on a scale of 1-5, where 1 is poor and 5 isexcellent) for both course modes were very high, 4.15/5 for onsite courses and 4.30/5 for onlinecourses.IntroductionAs the number of online courses increases1, student engagement remains critical to studentpersistence 2-6 especially in multidisciplinary classes where there are a variety of student majorswith a multitude of student learning goals. Student engagement increases when students are ableto
. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 MSI Faculty on the Rise: Strengthening Federal Grant Proposals through Cross- Institution Collaborations and NetworkingIntroductionMinority Serving Institutions (MSIs), such as Historically Black Colleges and Universities(HBCUs), Tribal Colleges and Universities (TCUs), Hispanic Serving Institutions (HSIs), andAsian American, Native American and Pacific Islander Serving Institutions (AANAPISIs), arecritically important higher education institutions that increase the representation of low-incomeand historically marginalized racial and ethnic groups in the workforce, including STEM fields[1]. Altogether, MSIs comprise 14% of degree-granting institutions in the United States
, through research and external evaluation, and as publication support. Most of his work is completed for Minority-Serving Institutions and he publishes regarding findings on a regular basis.Selinda Martinez, Laredo CollegeYan Xu, Del Mar CollegeYi Ren, Texas A&M University - KingsvilleDr. Antonio Guadalupe Carranza III, Laredo College ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025Comparative Analysis of the Impacts on Students’ Interests in STEM through Implementation of Different Types of Learning ModulesAbstract With STEM jobs increasing by about 10% over the last few years, it is expected that“demand for skilled technologists will exceed the number of qualified applicants by 1 million
award a full score of 5 points for participation, with an extra1 bonus point given to students who ranked in the top 50% of the participants. The effectivenessof this rubric in fostering active participation and encouraging greater effort on the pollingquestions is also discussed in this paper.IntroductionStudent engagement has been recognized as an essential factor in promoting academicachievement [1] and has gained a lot of research interest [2]. Gamification is one of the popularapproaches to student engagement and can be described as the incorporation of game designelements into nongame environments to engage individuals and promote desired behaviors [3, 4].Computer-based technologies are widely involved to support gamification in education
ofgreenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Natural disasters further exacerbate this impact by causingwidespread destruction, resulting in material waste, increased resource consumption, andemissions during reconstruction. Therefore, achieving environmental improvement andpromoting sustainable construction practices, including circular construction and life-cycleassessments (LCAs), is critical for reducing the industry’s environmental footprint and fosteringa more responsible built environment. To achieve sustainability goals in the constructionindustry, it is essential to equip the future construction workforce with knowledge and skillsrelated to sustainable construction practices. The goals of this study are to (1) understand theimpact of natural disasters
) Award for his contributions to engineering education. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 The Role of Mathematical Modeling in Integrating Disciplinary and Societal Knowledge: An Epistemic Network Analysis StudyIntroductionMathematical modeling is a critical component of the engineering design process [1]. Since thedesign process distinguishes engineering from other disciplines, mathematical modeling plays afundamental role in engineering practice, allowing engineers to describe, analyze, and predicttheir designs [2]. These mathematical models contribute in addressing questions that arise duringthe engineering design process [3]. Mathematical modeling is essential for
-awareness, academic success and retention,motivation, and access for students who are academically talented but may face additionalbarriers related to accessing resources, materials, courses, and programs for preparing students forpostsecondary education. In recognition of the need for, and effectiveness of, summer bridgeprograms, they are prevalent throughout postsecondary institutions, and their effectiveness andchallenges have been studied [1].Summer bridge programs can motivate students while preparing them for their future studies.Research has been done to study how a summer bridge program impacts students’motivation-related perceptions, and how those perceptions vary across different groups ofstudents [2]. A two-week residential summer bridge
education classes take a case study approach. This paper will describe the implementation of this hybrid GE/senior project course and will present the assessment of the first year of this program’s implementation. Introduction In January 2013, the California State University Board of Trustees mandated that, unless excepted, undergraduate degree programs, including engineering degrees, be limited to 120 units. Title 5 § 40508 [1] states that “[a]s of the fall term of the 2014-2015 academic year, no baccalaureate degree programs shall extend the unit requirement beyond 120 semester units…” This mandate and short timeline for implementation necessitated swift action for proposals to be submitted and approved via campus curriculum committees and
. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 SUCCESS FACTORS FOR MINORITIES IN ENGINEERS: ANALYSIS OF FOCUS GROUP MINI-SURVEYSJacqueline Fleming, National Action Council for Minorities in EngineeringAbstractFocus group conversations were previously reported for minority students from elevenengineering schools.1 This study describes the analysis of a mini-survey administered during thefocus group sessions in order to augment group discussions which can be dominated by strongpersonalities thereby skewing the results. One hundred and forty-four students, comprised of51.4% African American, 36.8% Hispanic, and11.8% of Other ethnicities, completed three open-ended questions on: how they became interested in
various examples and implementations through several oneonone interactions. Oneonone interactions help facilitate a great teaching environment, and are often utilized to teach students about programming misconceptions and errors in an introductory programming course. The repetitive nature of a substantial portion of these interactions makes them a prime candidate for improving scalability through automation. Automated assessment of programming exercises is often utilized to bridge the scalability gap. However, the openended nature of programming assignments can lead to (1) misguided automatic feedback, (2) a disconnection between an errant student solution and proper advice, (3) a complete lack of advice due to the student not understanding
, drawing on theprinciples, processes, and strategies inherent in nature to devise innovative and sustainablesolutions [1, 2]. By employing natural analogies, BID effectively tackles engineering challengesand holds the potential to nurture the knowledge and skills required for developing cost-effective, efficient, and sustainable solutions to complex human issues [3]. The incorporation ofBID into both graduate and undergraduate engineering curricula is endorsed by ABETaccreditation, which acknowledges collaborative skills within multidisciplinary teams asessential for today’s engineering students [1, 4]. Furthermore, as emphasized in the Engineer of2020 report, undergraduate education must prepare students to address engineering problems
primary metric of interest isthe accuracy of MFD. Transcription models, or recognition models, take a localized image of anequation and transcribe it into LaTeX. To narrow the scope of this paper, only models that weredeveloped or updated in the past 3 years are considered. The general performance of the modelsare evaluated using a representative sample of 9 slides from classes that participated in theproject. The classes include 3 computer science courses, 2 electrical engineering and computerengineering courses and 1 industrial engineering course. Name Type (Detection/Transcription) Year Capabilities Pix2Text Both 2024 Equations, tables PDF-Extract-Kit
considerations should be embedded into the design of educational tools for industrialengineering. The results provide insights for educators and game developers on how toincorporate these elements into 3D simulation-based learning environments to promoteinclusivity and foster more eq uitable learning experiences. The findings also offer broader oimplications for integrating incl usive digital elements into engineering education, specifically in othe design and development of educational games.1 IntroductionEducational games have emerged as an effective means to enhance engagement and learning inengineering education. Games can bridge the gap between theoretical knowledge and real
week: on Tuesday and Thursday, the class meets for an 80-minute lecturetaught by a professor, where new concepts were introduced; on Friday, the class met for a 50-50-minute-long discussion session, which was led by a Teaching Assistants (TA), whereproblem-solving about same week’s content was practiced. There were two 50-minute longquizzes, one in week 3, one in week 8, and a 3-hour long final exam. The Intervention The course-integrated learning strategies intervention was introduced to students in thename of the “Learn Smart” program. A program introduction lecture was given in week 4(lecture 9) after quiz 1. Then, a series of supplemental learning strategy training materials andassignments were given throughout the rest of
Society of Mechanical Engineers, a Fellow of the Institution of Engineers (India), and a Fellow of the Acoustical Society of India. He is the editor-in-chief of the Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Engineering Grand Challenges Video Competition - A Project Learning Tool in a Cross-Disciplinary ClassAbstract In 2007, the National Academy of Engineering (NAE) began working with a marketingcompany to rebrand engineering and better communicate the importance of engineering to thepublic and potential future engineers. The resulting messages were 1) Engineers are creativeproblem solvers, 2) Engineers make a world
assessment for measuring elementary students’ engineering skills andunderstanding-in-use. Finally, we describe the time needed to score the assessments, and discussits utility for larger-scale research studies.IntroductionThe Next Generation Science Standards[1] calls for all American students to learn engineering inaddition to science in grades K-12. The NGSS places particular emphasis on students learningengineering practices and an understanding of engineering design. At the earliest grades, childrenlearn about engineering as solving problems that people want solved. “Emphasis is on thinkingthrough the needs or goals that need to be met, and which solutions best meet those needs andgoals” [1 Appendix I]. Throughout elementary school, students
program’s goal has been to provide a quality program thatmeets accreditation standards while providing the students with a skill set that allows them tosucceed in computing careers. The curriculum content for the Computer Science degree is basedon the 2008 ACM Curriculum Report. The Computer Science degree at UVU is accredited byAccreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) in 2002 and currently has morethan 850 students. The program also has an advisory board comprised of representatives of localindustry who assist in aligning the program to industry needs and helping to acquire industrysupport and resources.Table 1 and 2 shows the enrollment and graduation trends in the Computer Science program. Ascan be seen from the tables, the
coursecovered essential topics contained in most traditional statics courses, but also includedseveral topics covered in introductory mechanics courses. Table 1 describes weeklytopics, student hands-on activities, as well as learning outcomes.Table 1 – Topics, Student Activities, and Learning Outcomes in Introduction to Solid MechanicsWeek Topics Hands-On Activities Learning Outcomes1 Forces Lab: Card Towers Hands-on design & testing experience with constraints2 Moments Lab: Jenga Analysis Identify moments created by
provided the following definition thatdefines engineering leadership through a list of required capabilities: “the ability to assess risk and take initiative, the willingness to make decisions in the face of uncertainty, a sense of urgency and the will to deliver on time in the face of constraints or obstacles, resourcefulness and flexibility, trust and loyalty in a team setting, and the ability to relate to others”7 (p.1).Lastly, the CDIO Syllabus, an internationally recognized innovative engineering educationframework, recently added an extension to include leadership. Within the extension, it isclearly stated that leadership is not orthogonal to the remainder of the engineering curriculum,but rather there is an extensive amount of
engineering education scholars and researches quality in mixed methods research methodologies. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Identifying response trends across mental health help-seeking beliefs in first- year engineering students using Latent Class Analysis (LCA)IntroductionTraditional variable-centered quantitative methods that are often used in engineering educationresearch, such as regressions and correlations, struggle to adequately represent the beliefs ofengineering students who do not fall into the majority, typically cisgender White men [1]. Usingperson-centered quantitative methods, researchers can avoid superficial characterizations ofgroups and issues caused by assumptions of