fields.AcknowledgementsSpecial thanks to University of Dayton Department of Engineering Technology faculty ChuckEdmonson, Jim Globig, Dave Myszka, and Bob Wolff for their work in developing anddelivering the Introduction to Engineering Technology modules discussed in this paper. Page 9.1363.7 Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2004, American Society for Engineering EducationReferences1. University of Dayton Bulletin 1959-60. Volume 70, Number 2. February, 1959.2. Segalewitz, S. A Paperless Engineering Technology First-Year Seminar Course Emphasizing
. Cambron, M.E., and Stacy, S.W. “Introducing Design to Freshmen and Sophomores at Western KentuckyUniversity.” Proceedings of the 2003 ASEE Annual Conference, Session 1353. Available CD-ROM3. Wood, K.L., Jensen, D., Bezdek, J. & Otto, K.N. “Reverse Engineering and Redesign: Courses to Incrementally Page 9.783.5and Systematically Teach Design”, Journal of Engineering Education, Vol 90, No 3., 2001, pp. 363-374. “Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2004, American Society for Engineering Education”4. Anwar, S., and Eric, G. “Enhancing
9 I enjoy mentoring more than I did before 8 I’m likely to seek out people to mentor in the future 9 My mentoring skills improved 10 I’m likely to continue to correspond with the women I mentored 6 Table 4. Mentor Survey Responses.References:1. Lee, J. D. (2002). “More than ability: Gender and personal relationships influence science and technologyinvolvement.” Sociology of Education 75(4): 349-373.2. Pierce, R. L. and Kite, M. E. (1999). “Creating Expectations in Adolescent Girls,” In S. N. Davis, M. Crawford,and J. Sebrechts (eds.), Coming Into Her
EED-0080452. Page 9.157.4 Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2004, American Society for Engineering EducationBibliography –1. E. T. Smerdon, “Let s Make Engineering A Profession," ASEE Prism on-line, March 1999.2. ASCE's Task Committee on the First Professional Degree, “Why We Must Raise the Bar,” Civil Engineering, April 2002, vol. 72, no 4.3. http://www.bioen.utah.edu/Undergraduate/AccPgm.htm.4. http://www.utah.edu/graduate_school/index.html.5. D.A. Christensen and K.W. Horch, “Experience with a New Accelerated Dual-Degree
Teams analyses dueCorrective Action Matrix, Piloting a Solution Teams recommend corrective actionSystem Dynamics Examples & ApplicationsVisual Control & 5-S, TPMLeading Teams & Leading Change Final Report PreparationReport presentations Presentations to companiesReport presentations Final Reports dueNo textbook was followed, but several references were used in addition to several public six-sigma websites. Required references were: The Six Sigma Way Team Field Book by Pande, et.al.,5 the Six Sigma Pocket Guide by Rath & Strong,6 and DOE Simplified by Whitcomb.7 Forinstruction and exam questions
, No. 5, pp. 574-576. 7) W. S. Harwood, (1996), “The one minute paper”, Journal of Chemical Education, Vol. 73, No. 3, pp. 229-230. 8) Linda B. Nilson, (1998), “Teaching at its best: A research based resource for college instructors”, Bolton, Mass: Anker, 123-128. 9) Molyeux, L (1992) Cooperative Learning: Math and Success. New York: Trellis Books. 10) E. Campbell and Karl A. Smith. (1997). New Paradigms for college teaching, Edina, Minn: Interaction Books, 185-210.BiographyDr. JASON GU earned his Ph.D. degree in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at University of Alberta inCanada. He is currently an assistant professor in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Dalhousie University.He
Journal, Vol. 115, February 2000, pp. 32-38.4. Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, “Remote Environmental Monitoring Units,” http://adcp.whoi.edu/REMUS/index.html, September 2002.5. R. Handerson, Sea Sense, International Marine Pub. Co., 1972.6. Steidley, Carl, Ray Bachnak, Steve Dannelly, Patrick Michaud, Alex Sadovski, "Image and Data Logging Systems for Environmental Studies and Research", Proceedings of the ISCA 12th International IASSE Conference, pp 31-36,San Francisco, CA, July 2003.7. Steidley, C., W. Lohachit, R. Bachnak, P. Michaud, S. Duff, and J. Adams,"A Remotely Operated Shallow- Water Boat for Wireless Data Logging", Proceedings of the 49th International Instrumentation Symposium of the Instrumentation
. “Monty Python’s Flying Circus in Australia – World’s Most Accurate Script,” , accessed January 11, 2004.STEPHEN J. RESSLERColonel Stephen Ressler, P.E., is Professor and Deputy Head of the Department of Civil and MechanicalEngineering at the U. S. Military Academy. He teaches structural engineering and currently serves as Past Chair ofthe ASEE Civil Engineering Division.JOSEPH P. HANUSMajor Joseph P. Hanus is Deputy Commander of the Galveston District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Hepreviously served as Assistant Professor in the Department of Civil and Mechanical Engineering at the U.S. MilitaryAcademy. Page 9.682.7
in product engineering and testing at National Semiconductor Corporation, S. Portland whileworking on this project. He graduated in May 2003. Upon graduation he was hired by National as a product engineer.Caglar’s interests are semiconductor device fabrication, CMOS integrated circuit design and testing. Page 9.1107.7 “Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2004, American Society for Engineering Education"
textbook and supplemental references to make comparisons aboutmaterial properties. In order to guide the students and enhance their learning experience,questions are posed based on Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives.5 Typicalquestions are listed below, along with the relevant work station location(s): 1. (third work station)What physical and mechanical properties do you think might be important for electronic packaging, and why? Describe at least five parts of the floppy drive read/write assembly and explain why the materials used were chosen. 2. (second work station) What other methods might you suggest for attaching or connecting devices or components in electronic packages? 3. (first and second work stations
professional development/continuing education programs was developed as ateaming agreement between the Department of Engineering Technology (DET) and the Centerfor Continuing Engineering Education (C2E2), which is an organization responsible forprofessional and community education for the Batten College of Engineering and Technology atOld Dominion University. This agreement combined C2E2’s expertise for the organization ofprofessional development programs with the content and delivery expertise from DET. Theinitial agreement was for a term of two years and covered party responsibilities, extension terms,amendment terms, course offerings, revenue sharing formulas, training performance criteria andidentified program coordinators.Figure 1 below outlines
to achieving successful systems engineering.Bibliography1 http://www.asem.com/geninfo.html#anchor126352, 2001.2. Maier, Mark W., and Rechtin, Eberhardt, “The Art of Systems Architecting”, CRC Press, 2nd Edition, 20023. Blanchard, Benjamin S., “System Engineering Management”, John Wiley & Sons, 3rd Edition, 2004.BiographyDr. P.B. Ravikumar is Professor of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering at the University of Wisconsin,Platteville. Besides on-line graduate courses in Systems Engineering Management and Design forManufacturability, he teaches different undergraduate courses in design and manufacturing. He has over fifteenyears of experience in engineering education and many years of direct and consulting experience in
as available for educational purposes include several of the NSF sponsoredNNIN sites, Department of Energy sponsored facilities associated with Los Alamos andSandia National Laboratories in New Mexico, U. S. Army sponsored facilities at MIT inMassachusetts, and others. A comprehensive inventory of micro- and nanofabrication userfacilities, with an assessment of the degree to which each might be made available to supporttechnician training, is being compiled. The inventory of nanofabrication facilities available for educational purposesmakes it clear that use of a centralized, nanofabrication facility that supports technician-level education programs at multiple institutions within a region may not be appropriateor even feasible
a curriculum redesign in the late 1990’s, the Purdue Electrical and ComputerEngineering Technology department incorporated into the curriculum four required projectcourses: • ECET 196, a 2 credit hour first semester freshman course that required students to build an already-designed 3-output power supply, and use basic time plan techniques to maintain control of the project work. • ECET 296, a 2 credit hour sophomore course that required the students to design and construct an audio power amplifier while closely following both performance and hardware/circuit specifications. • ECET 396, a 4 credit hour junior course that required teams of 3-4 students to design and build a project based primarily on
(1997), “Developing and Using Cases to Teach Practical Ethics,” Teaching Philosophy, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 353–385.Additional Resources for Teaching Engineering Ethics: C. E. Harris, M. S. Pritchard, and M. J. Rabins, Engineering Ethics: Concepts and Cases, 2nd ed., Wadsworth/Thompson Learning, 2000. D. G. Johnson, Ethical Issues in Engineering, Prentice-Hall, 1991. M. W. Martin and R. Schinzinger, Ethics in Engineering, 3rd ed., McGraw-Hill, 1996. Online Ethics Center for Engineering and Science: http://onlineethics.org. National Institute for Engineering Ethics: http://www.niee.org.Biographical InformationJIMMY H. SMITH, Ph.D., P.E., Video Project Director and Executive Producer, Professor of Civil Engineering
Human Factor in Engineering; John H. Burgess4 – FDA, US Food and Drug Administration Center for Devices and Radiological Health5 – Paramedic Emergency Care, Robert S. Porter, Brady, 2nd EditionThomas G. Boronkay, PhD, PE is a Professor in the Mechanical Engineering Technology department at theUniversity of Cincinnati. He received his PhD from the University of Cincinnati. He has presented papers at ASEEAnnual Conferences, ASME International Congress, and several international conferences and conductedCAD/CAM/CAE workshops nationally and internationally. He has also served in various capacities on the DEED,EDG and International Divisions’ executive committees.Janak Dave PhD, PE is a Professor in the Mechanical Engineering Technology department
machining practices book (Kibbe)3 and a lab manual created at Penn state.The lab manual specifically detailed the student’s assignment(s) within each module. Withineach module, the students were required to read the appropriate textbook material (Degarmo andKibbe) pertaining to the module they were assigned, complete the homework assignments, andfamiliarize themselves with the components for each machine. The lab instructor would thendemonstrate the proper operation of the machines to each group of 3 students. Each module wasperformed by a group of 3 students during which they would each manufacture small pre-designed projects as a demonstration of their understanding of each process. This class wasnever intended to train students to be proficient
VHDL Design, McGraw-Hill Higher Education, Boston, 2000 pp. 504-505.[2] Mitchell A. Thornton and Aaron S. Collins, “A Second Undergraduate Course in Digital Logic Design: The Datapath+Controller-Based Approach”, ASEE Southeastern Section 2003. Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Midwest Section Conference
many refinements during this experiment. These refinementsranged from the elimination of “wobble” in the mechanical supports of the LED and thephotodetector (via the use of vertical post mounts and an optical rail) to the elevation ofeach, in order to reduce the possibility of back-scattering from the environment. We alsoexplored the use of apperatures and better detectors…all resulting in a curve fit to a lineof slope much closer to –1 than the far-field prediction of –2. Currently, my new studentsand I are involved in further experiments in hopes of resolving this issue – ourenthusiasm only further enhanced by the desire to solve “mysteries.”References[1] S. Shepard and R. Hughes, “A Magnetic Levitation Control System,” to be submitted
cycles and more sophisticatedinstruction sets. While this capability is also available in variants of the SMC [4], thespreadsheet-based simulation usually requires less support overhead since thespreadsheet software is already available to most students. Potential Improvements The following improvements would expand the range of programs the students couldexperiment with: 1. Conditional control flow – there need to be one or more instructions that use the results of calculations to alter the program’s control flow. The TX-0’s Jump instruction was actually a conditional instruction that only jumped if the accumulator contained a negative number. That is one way to do it. 2. Input/output – students
Session 2525The role of virtual student design teams in engineering education for the “new workplace” K. Sheppard*, G. Korfiatis*, S. Manoochehri*, K. Pochiraju*, E. McGrath**, P. Dominick***, Z. Aronson*** *Charles V. Schaefer, Jr. School of Engineering **Center for Innovation in Engineering and Science Education *** Wesley J. Howe School of Technology Management Stevens Institute of Technology Hoboken, NJ 07030The “new workplace” for engineering is increasingly at the interface of three environments
State University. His researchinterests include vibrations and fracture mechanics.AHMET S. YIGITAhmet S. Yigit is the Director of the Office of Academic Assessment at the College of Engineering andPetroleum, Kuwait University. He is also a Professor at the Department of Mechanical Engineering. He receiveda Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Michigan. His research interests include dynamics andcontrol of flexible systems, impact, and engineering education. Page 9.702.12 Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2004
and continue to explore ways to incorporate the use of journals even moredeliberately into the course environment. We point out that the journal questions presented hereare appropriate for other course settings that require team assignments or written and oralreports.AcknowledgementsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under award#EEC-0087696.References1. Wilkerson, L. and Gijselaers, W. H. (eds). Bringing Problem-Based Learning to Higher Education: Theory and Practice. Jossey-Bass Pub., San Francisco, 1996.2. ABET Web Site 3. Barrows, H. S. Problem-Based Learning in Medicine and Beyond: A Brief Overview. pp. 3-12.4. Huba, M. E., & Freed, J. E. Learner-centered assessment on college
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Engineeringavailable may reflect student learning. For example, both may be strongly influenced by programsize, so that a high-quality program that deliberately kept its enrollment low would grant lownumbers of Ph.D.’s and be less familiar to recruiters. U.S. News and similar college ratings are additive. Colleges are ranked according to allthe factors used (inputs, output, resources, reputation, and even value-added measures). The finalrankings reflect weighted averages of the individual rankings for the factors. In a value-addedmodel, by contrast, high inputs raise expectations for outputs. In other words, a college withinputs associated with high outputs has a higher hurdle to overcome. To
3 2 1 9 – achieved active student involvement 5 4 3 2 1 10 – treated students with respect 5 4 3 2 1What worked well in the class? (Continue on back if necessary)What could have been improved? (Continue on back if necessary)Rater(s)_________________________________________________________________ Page 9.89.9
Satisfaction with ET Education at Penn State,”Proceedings of the 2002 ASEE Annual Conference, Montreal, June 16-19.[4] Building Learning Communities in Cyberspace, Palloff & Pratt, (1999) pp. 144-145, citing Brookfield, S. (1995)Becoming A Critically Reflective Teacher, San Francisco, Jossey-Bass Publishers.[5] See Abrami, Appollonia, and Cohen (1990) Journal of Educational Psychology[6]See Greenwald, A. and Gillmore, G., (1997) Journal of Educational Psychology (Vol. 89, No.4, p. 743-751)Finding that students evaluating college instructors are biased toward those who give high grades and require theleast work.[7] Whittington, Jana, 2003, “The Process of Effective Critiques,” Proceedings of the 2003 SIGGRAPH AnnualConference, San Diego, California
Session 1368 REINVENTING THE TEACHING OF STATICS Anna Dollár, Paul S. Steif Manufacturing and Mechanical Engineering Department Miami University, Oxford, OH 45056 / Department of Mechanical Engineering Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213IntroductionLearning in the subject of Engineering Statics deserves significant attention. First, Statics laysthe foundation for subsequent courses, namely Dynamics and Strength of Materials, both ofwhich rely heavily on free body diagrams and on recognizing
Alumni Survey 2002 Rochester Institute of Technology Engineering Technology Department College of Applied Science and Technology All information is confidential – no individual information will be reportedI. Please complete the following:1. Identification (optional)Name: _______________________________ Telephone: ____________ Email: _____________Address:_______________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________2 a. Degree(s) received from RIT AAS BS2 b. Program Electrical Computer Telecommunications Electrical/Mechanical Civil Mechanical
overtime cost. When leveling, use the following constraints. (1) No one task may besplit in its duration and resource requirements. For example, if a task takes four people threeweeks to complete, those parameters cannot be changed and the three-week block must becontinuous. (2) A task on the critical path cannot be moved in the schedule. (3) The sequence inany path cannot be changed; in other words, the given predecessors must be maintained. Assignment 15: For the projects in Assignments 10 and 13, construct the Gantt chart foreach project (a total of three). Show the critical path(s) task bars in a different color and patternfrom those tasks not on the critical path(s).Putting It All Together To help our students put all of their
thank Dr. Earl Lhamon of the LimaAstronomical Society for his enthusiasm and cooperation. The authors also thank the Lima CityEngineer Kirk Neimeyer and his staff for their assistance. The assistance provided by Dr. JasonPinkney of the Physics Department at ONU was also appreciated.Bibliogr aphic Infor mation 1. Chan, E. H. W., Chan, M. W., Scott, D., and Chan, A. T. S. (2002). “Educating the 21st century construction professionals,” Journal of Professional Issues In Engineering Education and Practice, 128(1), 44-48. 2. Molenaar, K. R., and Saller, B. J. (2003). “Educational needs assessment for design/build project delivery,” Journal of Professional Issues In Engineering Education and Practice, 129(2), 106-114. 3