spent rocket bodies and other debris from LEO. Though there is no current perfect solution forclearing the debris, the AFRL has decided to deploy a drag enhancing device from a satellite payloadto remove the debris.This report presents a finalized design, an Active Orbital Debris Removal (AODR) device for the 2018Air Force Research Laboratory University Design Challenge. Because the test of the AODR devicewill occur on Earth, both gravity and tropospheric conditions will have to be accounted for.Accounting for gravity will be accomplished via a hex copter which will lift the payload off the launchpedestal and deliver the payload to the rocket body. The proposed AODR device will use two cameras,a pair of stereoscopic cameras, a lidar detector
Arkansas, Fayetteville. Before joining the U of A faculty in 1996, he served in the US Army as an engineer officer for 24 years. During his military career Dennis had the unique opportunity to build roads, airfields and other facilities on five different continents and spend over 11 years as a member of the faculty at the US Military Academy. His current research interests include laboratory and field determination of geotechnical material properties for transportation systems and the use of remote sensing techniques to categorize geohazards. He has published over 85 peer reviewed articles relating to his research and educational activities. Dennis holds BS and MS degrees in Civil Engineering from the University of
learned. In an online environment that is asynchronous, learnersdo not have the constraints of time and place. By leveraging online technologies, studentlearning should be designed with transfer of same information to all learners. For the freshmanstudent, online learning is most suitable for factual type learning or less challenging learningactivities [12].F2F would be recommended for intensively challenging, high-benefit learning activities. Forexample, the hands-on laboratory experiments in EE110 solidify key concepts learned from themultimedia content: online videos, text readings, assigned homework and frequent onlinequizzes. Through peer collaboration, students can help each other work through the labs as wellas learning how to troubleshoot
. A recent chapter in the book “Changing the Face of Engineering” entitled, “SocializingAfrican American Females into Academic Careers: The Case of the Cross-Disciplinary Initiativefor Minority Women Faculty” presented a case study of a group of faculty in which theparticipants learned a variety of skills including time and laboratory management in addition tothe “unwritten rules” required for career success (Leggon and Barabino, 2015).We could spend a great deal of time defining the problem and assigning blame. There have beenplenty of excellent studies focused on framing the critical historical, climate and economic issuesin the past (National Research Council, 2006; 2010; Committee on Gender Differences inCareers in Science, Engineering
enables her to combine a deep understanding of scientific principles with the ability to tell a compelling story to communicate the scientific and potential societal impact of individual research projects. Her targeted campaigns raise the perceived stature of the organization and lead to successful institutional fundraising. After graduating from Williams College with a bachelor’s degree in chemistry and French, Thuy earned a Ph.D. in chemistry from the University of Hawaii. In her early career, she was a research scientist at Pacific Northwest National Laboratory and held management positions in several engineering firms, including CH2M HILL, Lockheed Martin, and Los Alamos Technical Associates. While pursuing her
summarize thefactor that the respondents consider advantages and obstacles to obtaining internships or coopsand permanent employment in their field. Students to relevant work experience as the greatestadvantage and employers’ lack of familiarity with their degree program as the greatest obstacle.Figure 10 What do you perceive as potential advantages to obtaining an internship/coop orpermanent employment in your field?Figure 11 What do you perceive as potential obstacles to obtaining an internship/coop orpermanent employment in your field?When asked to identify the most rewarding aspect of their undergraduate experience, the mostfrequent response was internship and coop opportunities, followed by the hands on learningexperiences and laboratory time
. Atkins, D. M. Levin, and J. Richards, “What is Responsive Teaching?” in Responsive Teaching in Science and Mathematics, A. D. Roberton, R. E. Scherr, and D. Hammer, Eds. Routledge, 2016, pp. 1–35. [9] E. Wenger and J. Lave, Situated Learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1991.[10] P. W. Irving and E. C. Sayre, “Conditions for building a community of practice in an advanced physics laboratory,” Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 010109, 2014.[11] E. Wenger, Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1998.[12] E. Wenger, R. McDermott, and W. M. Snyder, Cultivating Communities
emphasis in Public Policy and Administration from Boise State University. Her thesis was entitled, ”Nanomanufacturing Outside of the Lab: An Academic-Industry Partnership Case Study.” She also re- ceived her B.S. in Materials Science & Engineering from Boise State in 2014. In the Spring of 2016, Ann was recognized as part of the first cohort of University Innovation Fellows at Boise State, and has worked as a Fellow to collect and incorporate student feedback into future plans for makerspaces on the Boise State campus. As an undergraduate and graduate student, she has been involved with the Society of Women Engineers, and also taught a materials science laboratory course as a graduate teaching assis- tant. She has
protestations were ignored. In enhance a student’s self-efficacy, Suffolk EE classes have laboratory componentswhere students perform, either individually or as a team, hands-on exercises and projects thatengage students in understanding the theoretical concepts learned in their lectures. As much aspossible, “real-world” applications are used so that students get a sense that what they arelearning is important and relevant. For instance, in the required Introduction to DigitalElectronics course, teams of students develop a program using the Xilinx FPGA to implement aHamming Encoder/Decoder. In the Introduction to Engineering Design course, teams ofstudents build and program robots using the Parallax platform to perform stipulated tasks such asa
, along with recent headlines in Michigan, made this a project of particular interest to the students. The students tested weekly for common problem analytes such as nitrates (a big problem for our state) and water hardness, another problem which increases costs on campus related to maintaining heating and cooling lines. The students learned and applied new laboratory techniques and analysis methods. The results were collected, analyzed, and a poster and report were created to share the results with the director of the physical plant. Science Outreach Activities - in the first year of the grant students partnered with the local public library to create and implement a series of 3 science activity
environment. This could possibly be the reason for ahigher ranking for Team Work as an important skill. Scientists and Mathematicians are oftenmore focused around teaching, laboratory or other individualized tasks based on their workenvironments and therefore may not better value the importance of Team Work.Additional comments in the survey suggested that Emotional Intelligence, Software Skills,Interdisciplinary Thinking and Responsiveness to customer requirements also be incorporated inthe study. One participant stated that “Managers should understand the specific skills ofemployees and learn to delegate and assign work accordingly”. Another participant added “Workethic is sometimes interpreted differently by employers and employees. Employers
estimation theory. Andrew worked as a postdoctoral researcher at the Centre for Mechatronics and Hybrid Technology (Hamilton, Ontario, Canada). He also worked as a Project Manager in the pharma- ceutical industry (Apotex Inc.) for three years. Before joining the University of Guelph in 2016, he was an Assistant Professor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Maryland, Balti- more County. Andrew worked with a number of colleagues in NASA, the US Army Research Laboratory (ARL), USDA, NIST, and the Maryland Department of the Environment (MDE). He is an ASME and IEEE member, and a Professional Engineer. Andrew was an Associate Editor for the Transactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical
. Hattwig, K. Bussert, A. Medaille and J. Burgess, “Visual literacy standards in higher education: New opportunities for libraries and student learning,” Libraries and the Academy, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 61-89, 2013. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1353/pla.2013.0008. [Accessed Jan. 29, 2018].[17] American Association of School Librarians, “Standards for the 21st-century learner in action,” 2009.[18] “enGauge 21st century skills: Literacy in the digital age,” North Central Regional Educational Laboratory and the Metiri Group, 2003. [Online] Available: www.ncrel.org/engauge. [Accessed Jan. 29, 2018].[19] Partnership for 21st Century Learning, “Framework for 21st century learning.” [Online] Available: www.p21.org. [Accessed Jan. 31
overlooked; Sharing known skills- Students who possess certain knowledge or skills (computer skills, laboratory skills, data analysis and reduction skills, writing skills, presentation skills, etc.) should be willing to pass it on, and/ or share it with their group members; Collaborative skills- Groups cannot function effectively if members do not have (be willing to learn) or use some needed social skills. Such as: leadership, decision-making, trust building, and conflict management; Monitoring progress- Groups need to discuss amongst themselves whether they are achieving their set goals. They need also to prioritize the scheduled activities, introduce changes when needed, and solicit advice
computer-based models at theexpense of physical models. This fact is behind a general trend of teaching applied engineeringsubjects with minimal students’ involvement with physical set-ups including laboratoryexperiments. Carrying out laboratory experiments and generating experimental data, visiting aproject site, and using pencil and paper to produce a schematic, are gradually fading away. Thesetraditional tools were instrumental in developing an engineering common sense. It is argued herethat generating data from physical models is potentially a great learning tool, particularly whenthe model is built by the students. Building a model, testing a model, generating physical datafrom the model, and analyzing said data, help students alternate
school and jobs. Lapatto [2] investigated the influence of research on the educationalexperience of undergraduates in science by conducting an online survey from 41 institutions. Itwas found that 85% of the participants continued on to postgraduate education after finishingtheir undergraduate research. On the other hand, a small portion of the participants who didn’tcontinue to postgraduate studies also reported comparatively poor gains from their undergraduateresearch experience. Learning laboratory techniques, understanding the research process andreadiness for more demanding research were some of the positive effects of undergraduateresearch experience mentioned in the survey. Webber et al. [3] conducted a survey research byanalyzing 110,000
in the Same InstitutionEngineering Technology. A lesser known program, engineering technology attracts students inareas where there are universities offering these majors. While the attraction to these programstends to be regional, students generally don’t always choose these programs right after highschool, but transfer in from a variety of places. In many cases, they may have matriculatedstraight out of high school through the influences of teachers and advisors they knew andrespected. Other options include those that transfer into programs from community colleges withengineering technology programs, and other reasons, including poor grades in engineering,desire for more hands on laboratory experiences, or learning that the engineering
not thefocus of most construction programs and are not discussed to a satisfactory extent in constructionclassrooms and laboratories, some students do not even have the chance to seriously consider thoseroles and even decide if they would prefer to work in those roles in the future. Unfamiliarity andmisconceptions about professional roles brings conflicts during practice and also increasesstudents’ doubts about their level of knowledge and capabilities [4]. Construction graduates havefound themselves working on transportation and infrastructure projects, instead of the typicalcommercial construction building projects that they are mostly prepared for through typicalconstruction programs. It is not uncommon to find students who have graduated
for. I would like my students to be functional when they enter the workplace… Whether it's at a consulting firm, a public agency, a research laboratory, as a faculty member, I'd like them to be able to know about and in some detail the kinds of things that they'd be expected to do when they get there.Many faculty see their roles as preparing students to contribute to their engineering profession ofchoice. Therefore, knowing more about how students transfer their learning to a workplace canpotentially help faculty improve their instructional approaches to more adequately meet theneeds of the discipline. Participants recognized that measuring and assessing learning iscomplex, and doing so within the timeframe of
effective communication, emotional intelligence, conflict resolution, and customer service excellence. It was during those five years when he realized that supporting young professionals with their leadership development is his life calling. He decided to leave corporate business and accepted a position at Cornell’s College of Engineering. During the last years, Mr. Zorman has focused on the design and implementation of a course using a student-led laboratory method which supports the development of authentic leadership skills.Dr. Alicia M. Kinoshita, San Diego State UniversityDr. Natalie Mladenov, San Diego State University Dr. Natalie Mladenov is an associate professor and William E. Leonhard Jr. Chair in Civil
work supported by the National Science Foundation under GrantNos. 1160455 and 1254323. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendationsexpressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views ofthe National Science Foundation. We also thank affiliates of Prof. Jesiek’s Global EngineeringEducation Collaboratory (GEEC) and Prof. Woo’s Laboratory for Understanding Careersand Individual Differences (LUCID) for their extensive assistance with developing SJT items.References[1] Grandin, J., & Hirleman, E. D. (2009). Educating engineers as global citizens: A call for action / A report of the national summit meeting on the globalization of engineering education. Online Journal of Global
connection between laboratory research and classroom lectures, enabling students to see anduse the course material in action. While not a CURE, instructors at Montana State University andNortheastern University implemented similarly hands-on, experiential learning exercises in anintroductory industrial engineering course. They found that students physically working withproblems and seeing how real systems operated were more compelling than traditional teachingpedagogies; students even seemed more enthusiastic about industrial engineering [21]. Manyothers have reported CURE benefits, including networking and developing scientific skills, aswell as outcomes like increased teamwork, critical thinking, communication skills, andconfidence [14].Because
,presentations and simulation assignments. The three modeling and simulation assignments were: (1) Heat Radiation 1 d; (2) WaterPurification Reactor, and (3) Free Convection in a Water Glass. These were assigned for out-of-classroom individual work. The objective in each was to produce a working COMSOL file andassociated technical report for upload to the Blackboard®. At the beginning of the semester,instructions were given as to how to: access software either in the computer laboratory or on apersonal computer; download step-by-step tutorials; create mph files and brief technical report;and upload documentation to Blackboard®. Each simulation topic was also addressed in class asappropriate. For example, the Heat Radiation simulation was tied to
constructionist learning principles that many believe evolved fromthe likes of shop class, technology education, and Stager’s constructivist learning laboratories,have now become a part of learning environments in schools, libraries, and museums in theUnited States. Even though dating earlier conceptually, the establishment of Maker Ed in 2012can be considered a watershed moment in the history of educational Makerspaces. Maker Ed wasfounded with the aim of transforming education through Making activities. Makerspacesmanifest constructionist principles of learning by doing by emphasizing the connection betweenthe Maker and that what is made or the artifact, accommodate individualized learning, supportstudents to feel personally connected to the activities
Assistant Program [17], which focuses onpedagogical development for undergraduate learning assistants who are in similar roles as GTAsin CBEE. Topics were also chosen to address past issues that GTAs expressed in regards tofeeling unprepared to facilitate in Studio and using language of reform based practices but notfully understanding the theory behind them.New to the 2016-2017 academic year, all incoming graduate students were required to take a 1-credit, 50-minute-per-week professional development seminar each term of their first year (eachterm is 10 weeks). The seminar was designed to help graduate students become accustomed tograduate expectations in CBEE (e.g. laboratory rotations, finding an advisor, thesis/dissertationresources, required
Paper ID #22398A Methodology and Experience of Facilitating International Capstone Projectsfor Multidisciplinary Fields: Costa Rica Internet of Things (IoT) Case StudyDr. Karim Altaii, James Madison University Dr. Altaii holds a Ph.D. in mechanical engineering, and received his doctorate from The City University of New York. He is a registered Professional Engineer. He holds five patents in solar energy applications and in an irrigation system. He is the director of the JMU international summer program in Costa Rica. He is the Director of the Advanced Thermal-Fluids laboratory at James Madison University. His primary
’ understanding andexperience, especially for an undergraduate course.After a number of brainstorming sessions early-on to decide what “thing” (device) to build thecourse around, we chose a simple desk lamp. The decision to use a desk lamp was chosen basedon several criteria: • The device’s use and utility should be obvious to most any user; avoid devices requiring substantial domain knowledge (e.g., motor control), particularly since the target audience of students is broad (EE, CE, CS) • The device should have some state to manage, but that state should not be overly complicated • The device should be easily portable, so students can develop and use it in the classroom, home, dorm room, laboratory, or wherever they
College of Engineering and Assistant to the Provost for Faculty Development at Michigan Tech. She received her M.S. and Ph.D. from the University of Notre Dame and B.S. from Michigan Tech. Adrienne’s research interests include elec- trokinetics, predominantly dielectrophoretic characterizations of cells, and the development of biomedical microdevices. She earned a NSF CAREER award and was nominated for Michigan Professor of the Year in 2014. Research within her Medical micro-Device Engineering Research Laboratory (M.D. – ERL) also inspires the development of Desktop Experiment Modules (DEMos) for use in chemical engineer- ing classrooms or as outreach activities in area schools (see www.mderl.org). Adrienne is past
Military Academy. His current research interests include laboratory and field determination of geotechnical material properties for transportation systems and the use of remote sensing techniques to categorize geohazards. He has published over 85 peer reviewed articles relating to his research and educational activities. Dennis holds BS and MS degrees in Civil Engineering from the University of Missouri-Rolla (now Missouri University of Science and Technology), an MBA from Boston University and a Ph.D. from the University of Texas-Austin. He is a registered professional engineer in Arkansas and Colorado.Dr. Decker B. Hains, Western Michigan University Dr. Decker B. Hains is a Master Faculty Specialist in the Department
) and skills that would be gained in technical and non-technical courses and laboratories to provide you with the fundamental academic knowledge needed to meet your three, five, and ten year goals. ● Provide three specific examples of course material you expect to use to achieve your desired goals. For example, you may choose to take a course in nuclear engineering to develop your knowledge of nuclear power plants with the goal of developing cleaner energy systems for developing nations. ● Identify and describe other specific areas of knowledge, skills, and abilities you will need to master to achieve the goals you have previously identified. ● Identify and provide details of the sources you will use to