different kinds of engineering majors offered by the university,common processes students perform (building a four year plan, adding and dropping classes,etc.), and helps students to transfer successfully into their newly focused studies. Students thatelected to take the survey submitted their major, noted how long they had been attending college-level classes, and completed an engineering identity survey (Godwin, 2016).Nine of the students (less than 3%) in the University 101 class completed the survey. This poorturnout may be due to a lack of incentive to fill out the survey or because of the timing of thesurvey distribution (three weeks before final exams). While the survey only took a few minutesto fill out and the following interview would
originally planned. Forexample, instructional staff provided a cybersecurity card game used to teach key cybersecurityconcepts but had to leave early. A junior counselor was able to fill in and create a new activitythat incorporated the card game in a way that was much more fun for the student campers whileteaching the cybersecurity concepts better.Junior counselors introduced the campers to cybersecurity ‘Capture The Flag’ (CTF)competitions and coached a live cybersecurity CTF event with camper teams. This collaborationbetween the student counselors and cybersecurity campers became a very popular camp activity;the cybersecurity campers asked the student counselors for additional CTF resources and wereinterested in setting up similar competitions in
plan wasdeveloped.Methodology and Project PlanBrainstorming took place to develop numerous potential solutions to solve the issues previouslydescribed. From this brainstorming, the three best proposed solutions were determined forconsideration in further development through the design cycle. A Pugh matrix was developed tocompare these proposals based on desired criteria collected from customer reviews andmarketing research (Appendix A). After analyzing the Pugh matrix, it was determined thatconsolidating a vacuum cleaning system and deep cleaning system into one device was the bestoption. This proposed solution utilized two separate intakes for each system connected via a y-joint, allowing for a split flow path leading to a universal
were invited to attend. A review of the cohort schedule showed thatapproximately three-quarters of the ENGR 2100 students had schedules that would allow them toattend.Students in ENGR 2100 were invited to participate in a survey related to their study habits (hoursper week in class, studying alone, studying with a group), use of tutoring, used of faculty officehours, and work hours per week. Two forms of the survey were administered, one for the start ofthe semester related to students’ plans for each of the categories and one for the end of thesemester related to their actual time allocation. The pre-semester version of the survey is alsoshown in the Appendix. Students who completed both start- and end-of-semester surveys wereentered into a
students will be collected and analyzed to study theteaching and learning effectiveness of these modules for further improvement. Each module willbe a complete, and stand-alone package that operates in three modes, i.e. Learning, Assessment,and Game modes. The Learning Mode teaches fundamental concepts through simulations andvisualization, the Assessment Mode quizzes on the understanding of these concepts withconceptual questions, and the Game Mode gives problems for students to apply concepts andtheir critical thinking and problem-solving skills. All the activities are carefully thought throughand planned to cover, teach, and assess critical concepts in a systematic matter.2. MechGames: Projectile Motion moduleThis section discusses the pilot
each subjectwere determined by university planned common exam times. For example, Chemistry 115common exams were scheduled on Monday evenings from 7 – 9 pm so those tutoring sessionswere scheduled on “off weeks” from exams.Chemistry 115 was scheduled for Monday, Mathematics 155 (Calculus) was scheduled forTuesday evenings and Mathematics 153 / 154 (Calculus Part 1 & 2) was scheduled for Thursdayevenings. These subjects were chosen since the majority of students in the Engineering LLCwere enrolled in those courses.In the spring of 2019, tutoring was expanded to cover Physics 111 (General Physics) andMathematics 156 (Calculus 2) as those were classes that the majority of the students typicallytake in the spring semester.House Cup / Running
together provide leadership, create a collaborative and inclusive environment, establish goals, plan tasks, and meet objectives. 8. Every group in class participated equally. 9. Every person in my group participated equally. 10. As a result of this project, I have a better understanding of the amount of work involved to design a complex machine. 11. Having the entire class work on a single collaborative project is a better learning experience vs. every person working on individual projects. Students rated the questions above on a scale from 1 – 5 where a 1 was strongly disagreeand a 5 was strongly agree. Results from the assessment survey are shown in Figure 6 below: Figure 6: Course survey, before
. Consequently, it may be especially important to ensure that students enroll in a mathcourse that aligns with their current skill set, even if they must devise an alternative plan to meetfuture prerequisite requirements. Among our population, and others [20], math self-efficacy wasmore dependent on grade earned, rather than course enrolled.To what extent might math self-efficacy be associated with persistence in engineering?We indeed found that math self-efficacy was highest among students who were retained throughtheir sophomore year. Given the potential role of math self-efficacy in retention, it may beimportant to encourage classroom environments and support activities that help to build mathself-efficacy, especially among students who do not
-advising model infused several Research on academic advising stands to gainformative topics and activities into the first-year engineering from applying a CRT lens. For example, previouscourse. These included major selection; identification of peer- research at one institution reported a change insupport mechanisms; references to available counseling, advising structure increased student satisfactiontutoring and career-planning resources; periodical remindersregarding academic deadlines; check-ins to identify students at overall [4]; however, it failed to account for possibleacademic and/or medical risk; and early interventions for differing experiences among engineeringstudents who experienced
six General Education outcomes. The overalltheme of the seminar, as well as the topics of the individual seminar sections, are determined bythe faculty. Based on the freshman population, there are typically 14-28 different seminar topicsand 18-23 sections with approximately 20 students per section. Because of the broad nature ofthe General Education outcomes, each seminar section varies in its particular topic, spanningmany different disciplines. The School of Engineering at The Citadel used the curriculum updateas an opportunity to engage both engineering and non-engineering students with engineeringtopics in the freshman seminars. The new plan calls for each section of the Freshman Seminar tobe matched with a three-credit-hour composition
important to plan out theimplementation process for the game. It was decided to first implement the core game functionality.To verify that core game functionality is correct, multiple exhaustive rounds of the new Snake gamewere to be played. After ensuring that the base functionality of the game was complete and correct,the hardening and obfuscation was to be included.As previously mentioned, obfuscation techniques were to be junk code insertion, rabbit-holefunction calls, and stack pointer manipulation. Junk code insertion is a common and relativelysimple technique in basic code hardening and obfuscation. The goal of this technique is to muddythe source code of an application without changing the functionality of the application. To do this,random
admissionsrecords. The academic plan (major), semester GPA and cumulative GPA for each semester astudent was enrolled were obtained from College of Engineering records. There are also recordsfor each degree the students were awarded and the year and semester of degreeawarded. Demographic information is coded as reported to the Integrated PostsecondaryEducation Data System (IPEDS).The students are grouped by cohorts of their attendance at ESCape. These cohorts alsocorrespond to the students’ first semester in college. All of the participants were first-time, first-year students. Comparison data comes from the College of Engineering and the Office ofInstitutional Research and Planning. Using these sources, a comparison can be made betweenthe ESCape attendees
semantics and tricky syntax.Programming students today must master some of these languages in order to be viable jobcandidates.Programming is a complex cognitive task that can be broken down into four concrete steps, atleast at the outset. For larger systems there may be other aspects as well: ● Comprehension of the desired task ● Planning a sequence of steps to accomplish that task ● Writing a program in a particular language to implement the algorithm ● Testing and (usually) debugging the program In teaching programming, we can show students the programming constructs of alanguage, such as a loop, but like any language, fluency comes through practice. The obviousway to build competence is to have students write programs
. • Internal Failure Costs: Costs associated activities when product or process fail internally (before and product / service has not been experienced by the customer). Examples include scrap, rework, equipment unscheduled downtime, etc. • External Failure Costs: Costs associated with activities resulting from product or service not conforming to requirements after being experienced by to the customer. Examples include processing and replacement of customer returns, warranty charges, etc.The above costs can be divided into conformance (prevention and appraisal) andnonconformance (internal and external failures). The conformance costs are associated withactivities that are normally planned while the failure costs are not
economic factors I learned to look into how prevalent a disease is in another country in order to determine if marketing a device is worth the profit based on the country’s GDP Determine whether or not a new market is possible within other countries What modifications can be made to make new markets possible Learned the 3 key metrics for success of a medical device Learned more on how to build a market analysis plan. Also more about other countries development in medicine The module was engaging. Allowed students to investigate markets I better understand the economics that goes into introducing a product to a new country More of a market side of engineering I think it
thediscipline. The data card is a tool used to develop a search plan and then inform recruitment anddevelopment of a hiring strategy to yield the best pool of candidates that includes minorityprospective faculty. This proactive approach can lead to collaborative work between searchcommittees and administrators. However, blaming search committees alone for not presenting adiverse pool of candidates for hiring decisions to be made up the chain is insincere if committeemembers are not included early on in the development of faculty search plans, do not have aproactive voice in the recruitment strategy, and are not given direct resources to be innovative inthe areas of non-traditional advertising that may be required to reach out to minority faculty
various constituencies for the purpose of enhancing support for the University. He was the director of all major fund raising activities and led the successful $275 million Campaign for Polytechnic - Fulfilling the American Dream, which raised $100 million in addition to the extraordinary Othmer gifts of $175 million. Dr. Thorsen led Polytechnic’s development of its Strategic Plan for 2004-2007, Securing the Future and had responsibility for its implementation. He also led the University’s brand marketing initiative which led to PolyThinking R and The Power of PolyThinking R and became the foundation of our recent branding and marketing initiative. He led the University’s year long sesquicentennial celebration in 2004
is necessary for learning. Further,metacognition entails reflecting on one’s thinking, knowing about one’s knowing, and directingone’s own learning. Regular reflection plays a critical role in the construction of metacognitiveknowledge and self-regulatory skills, or planning, monitoring, and evaluating one’s own learningand knowledge. Metacognition is important because it supports the development of lifelonglearning skills needed to excel in the workforce. It provides students with strategies for whennew tasks arise, as they must be able to navigate independently after college by directing theirown learning. The literature has highlighted a lack of frequent, structured reflection andmetacognition in the engineering curriculum as well as the
Paper ID #30005Board Game Development as a Pedagogical Approach to TeachingUndergraduate Students in an Interdisciplinary Course that AddressesContemporary Societal IssuesMichael N. Littrell, Tennessee Technological University Michael Littrell is a graduate research and teaching assistant at Tennessee Tech University. He is pursuing a PhD in Exceptional Learning with an Emphasis in Program Planning and Evaluation. He is interested in quantitative research methodology in education, student assessment, and applied statistics. Michael Littrell has conducted research and evaluation of a wide range of education and non-education
to meetwith an academic advisor to prepare a degree plan for the new major.Around 2014, multiple schools including the School of Engineering and Computer Science andthe School of Management enforced the 2.0 GPA threshold more and more strictly. By 2016,approvals for change of majors to these Schools for students that did not meet the thresholdwere very rare. This extended to change of major requests from one major to another withinthe School of Engineering and Computer Science as well. In the 2017 catalog multiple Schoolssought more control over the process for a variety of reasons, mostly over concerns about theability of the School to accommodate demand for its majors and allocation of resources tomatch growth. The 2017 academic catalog
theme that emerged involved the impact of training on presentation and communicationtechniques. This theme included reflections on how the participants changed their presentation orhow they communicated with the public. Some examples of this theme included participantstalking about how they planned their presentation or how their presentations andcommunications were received by the public. “I was thinking about a slide presentation. But after Monday’s training I realized that’s probably not a good idea.” – Alena “I definitely was trying to think about how to engage in a way that makes people think about their personal lives, and examples, and pull in some of those pieces.” – Kacey “So I decided to put up 4 pictures
client, design experience, and CAD. One student wrote, “I gained realworking experience, both with a group and with a client. This project stressed the importance ofactually providing our client with a piece that could be functional, as it had a chance to be createdand was worth more than just a grade.” The students enjoyed the design process, being introducedto the creative side of engineering and working with a real client. When asked what they woulddo different, students’ most common answer was along the lines of planning better, using atimeline, and following a more detailed design strategy.Community Partner FeedbackThe stakeholders in this project were the four partners: Metro Deaf School, Minnesota Children’sMuseum, the University of St
competitive, which can ultimately help them in the competitive engineering world.The aim of this project is to create a miniature racing car that will provide students with the abilityto apply engineering design to produce solutions that meet specific needs with consideration ofmultiple factors. Ultimately, having the ability to function effectively on a team whose memberstogether provide leadership, create a collaborative environment, establish goals, plan tasks, andmeet objectives is crucial to completing a project efficiently.A significant part of this project is to examine how every mechanical change that can be done fromrace to race can be implemented to the miniature racing car in order to make it powerful enoughto successfully finish the
institution wide efforts being made to positively impact the entire engineering collegeand university. As the grant enters its final years, the poster will also discuss plans on engagingthe broader engineering academic community in order to establish best practices forimplementing diversity and inclusion initiatives in other programs.IntroductionRowan University’s Civil and Environmental Engineering (CEE) Department was awarded theNational Science Foundation’s Revolutionizing Engineering and computer science Departments(RED) grant back in 2016. The purpose of the grant is to change the department’s ability to serveunderrepresented minorities (URMs) and underserved groups over the course of the next fiveyears. The grant provides funding over those
on effective interventions that will promote studentlearning and positive grade outcomes in first year engineering courses. This historically difficultcourse (EE 306) has warranted multiple forms of academic support, including undergraduate TAoffice hours, tutoring and Supplemental Instruction (SI). Careful attention has been paid toindividualize these programs to emphasize the content and study skills students need to besuccessful in these specific courses. Encouraged by Shew et al’s findings [2], we wanted toimplement the collaborative mock exam reviews as a new and innovative option to assiststudents in their planning, preparation and overall actual exam performance.Limitations of StudyLimitations of assessing correlations between grade
the MET 4100 curriculum. The subject of this newly developed project is todesign (start-to-finish) an HVAC system to satisfy the heating load requirements for the twoMET laboratories in the ET Department. This course is a senior level course, and at this level,the students already have prior general knowledge of technical drawing and drafting, heattransfer, psychometric chart, and duct design. To better facilitate the access to the technicalinformation, a lesson plan discussing the benefits of using the University’s library resources andan online LibGuide webpage (https://libguides.utoledo.edu/MET4100) were created and added tothe course’s Blackboard platform. The webpage lists some of the resources required for theHVAC design project, like e
PhD in Electrical and Computer Engineering at North Dakota State University. He previously earned his MS in Systems Engineering from the University of Saint Thomas and his BS in Electrical Engineering from the University of Minnesota.Ms. Lauren Singelmann, North Dakota State University Lauren Singelmann is a Masters Student in Electrical and Computer Engineering at North Dakota State University. Her research interests are innovation-based-learning, educational data mining, and K-12 Out- reach. She works for the NDSU College of Engineering as the K-12 Outreach Coordinator where she plans and organizes outreach activities and camps for students in the Fargo-Moorhead area.Mary Pearson, North Dakota State University
, whois a senior faculty member, this mentoring program has been evolved and expanded over many years upto a point where it has become a very effective and helpful system for both the incoming and the outgoingundergraduate students [7].School of Engineering, Polytechnic University of Puerto Rico (PUPR), Puerto RicoSeven (7) fulltime faculty members offer mentoring. Each mentor is assigned certain number of studentsand receives compensation for up to two (2) credit hours per semester. Students with eighty (80) or moreapproved credit hours are assigned a mentor for discussing their career plans, progress in the academicprograms, optimal or alternative choices for course selection, and so on [8]. In addition, the office ofStudent Development and
initialimplementation in an IEG has been discussed and is shared at our course websitehttps://hub.wsu.edu/me-116/pdm/ to promote further implementation across academic institutionsand provide reasonable insight into implementation.Our university will be sharing our implementation with a club shortly, and we also plan to utilizethe data mining capabilities associated with SWPDMS in future educational research.References[1] E. Wiebe, "Impact of Product Data Management (PDM) trends on Engineering Graphics Instruction," 1998.[2] D. S. Kelley, "Product Lifecycle Management Philosophies Within a Computer-Aided Design Program of Study," 2003.[3] R. T. Frame, C. Pezeshki, and M. Grant Norton, "Integrating PLM Methods into the Undergraduate
example, the emergent of industrial 4.0 or smart factory comes with a very complicatedinformation flow and man-machine system [2]. This necessitates to rethink the way of educatingengineers for the future. Considering this fact, this paper investigates an approach of integratingthe simulation-based activities in the classroom to bring changes in the learning outcomes ofmanufacturing course.Over the last few decades, traditional manufacturing/production engineering educational programshave long depended on curricula based on concurrent engineering methodologies covering productand process designs, functional design development, concept selection for product design,materials and process selection, process planning including assembly analysis, etc