Paper ID #11074Preparing Engineers for Global ChallengesDr. Souhail Elhouar, Bradley University Dr. Elhouar is an Associate Professor of Civil Engineering and Construction at Bradley University. He holds a M.Sc. and a Ph.D. in structural engineering from the University of Oklahoma in Norman, Okla- homa and a BSc in Building Engineering and Construction from the University Of Tunisia School Of En- gineering in Tunis (ENIT). He specializes in the analysis and design of industrial and non-industrial steel buildings and has been teaching steel design and other related courses for many years. His research inter- ests
more accurate results). In this case, thefactors will be dependent. Such an analysis will be performed both at the beginning usingdomain expertise but also during the experiment analyzing the answers received and adaptingprior decisions.Step 3: However, not all categories have the same contribution. Therefore, the researchers hadto identify the relative relevance of the determined categories. For instance, the inputs from ajunior respondent being as relevant as the inputs from a senior level respondent need to bedetermined. A senior level respondent may be more experienced and have more knowledge inprinciple and current best practices of the field, but it may also be the case that a junior levelrespondent may be more aware of the emerging
©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 A Systems Engineering Approach to Metacognition in a Final Synthesis ProjectAbstractThis complete evidence-based practice paper examines the implementation of a final synthesisproject within a success skills course for first-year engineering students enrolled in GeneralEngineering Learning Community at Clemson University designed to support students with lowcalculus readiness. The program’s goal is to enhance retention and foster academic andprofessional success by providing holistic support, including a co-enrollment in a professionalskills and learning strategies course. The course focuses on cultivating key habits in students,encompassing professional behaviors
do, it isimportant that they are aware of engineering and are open to future possibilities for themselveswith engineering. Page 26.760.13Bibliography[1] Supovitz, J. A., & Turner, H. M. (2000). The effects of professional development on science teaching practices and classroom culture. Journal of research in science teaching, 37(9), 963-980.[2] Guskey, T. R., & Yoon, K. S. (2009). What works in professional development. Phi delta kappan, 90(7), 495- 500.[3] Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations
Model for Engineering Mathematics Education, and has also led an NSF supported research project to develop the nation's first undergraduate curriculum in bioinformatics.David Reynolds, Wright State University David B. Reynolds is an Associate Professor in the Department of Biomedical, Industrial and Human Factors Engineering at Wright State University. He is a Co-PI on WSU's National Model for Engineering Mathematics Education, and has also conducted NSF supported research to develop human factors engineering undergraduate design projects for persons with disabilities.Richard Mercer, Wright State University Richard E. Mercer is an Associate Professor in the Department of Mathematics and
underrepresented minorities in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM).Dr. Aileen Huang-Saad, University of Michigan Aileen is an Associate Professor of Practice in Entrepreneurship and Biomedical Engineering. Previously, Aileen was the Associate Director for Academics in the Center for Entrepreneurship and was responsible for building the Program in Entrepreneurship for UM undergraduates, co-developing the masters level entrepreneurship program, and launching the biomedical engineering graduate design program. Aileen has received a number of awards for her teaching, including the Thomas M. Sawyer, Jr. Teaching Award, the UM ASEE Outstanding Professor Award and the Teaching with Sakai Innovation Award. Prior to
Guevara, J. C. Tudón Martínez, D. HernándezAlcántara, and R. Morales-Menendez, “Active learning in engineering education. A review offundamentals, best practices and experiences,” International Journal on Interactive Design andManufacturing (IJIDeM), vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 909–922, Feb. 2019, doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-019-00557-8.[2] L. C. Hodges and Internet Archive, Teaching undergraduate science: a guide to overcomingobstacles to student learning. Sterling, Virginia: Stylus Publishing, 2015. Available:https://archive.org/details/teachingundergra0000hodg.[3] A. Retnanto, M. Fadlelmula, N. Alyafei, and A. Sheharyar, “Active Student Engagement inLearning - Using Virtual Reality Technology to Develop Professional Skills for
universitywithin the first year. Typical reasons cited for leaving the university include lack of awareness ofacademic support resources, sense of belonging, the uncertainty of best practices to succeed incollege, etc. This one-week residential RAMP program was created to fill this void by engaging inextensive team-building activities, exposure to academic resources on campus, networkingactivities with college peer mentors to learn best practices, and overall obtaining a jump-start oncollege. The ideas was to instill a sense of belonging among students, aid in improving the first-to second-year retention, and increase the number of graduating students in engineering disciplinesoverall. More analyses are being conducted to determine if this aspect of the
degree in Industrial and Systems Engineering and a minor in Sales Engineering.Elayne Col´on, University of Florida Dr. Elayne Col´on is a Clinical Professor and Interim Associate Dean for Academic and Student Affairs in the College of Education at the University of Florida. With a background in school psychology, her scholarly interests include accountability and accreditation, the preparation of educators for P-12 settings, and the ways in which we measure learning and impact in higher education.Jade Williams Dr. Williams is a faculty member in the Department of Communication in Chandler-Gilbert Community College. She has an active research program employing qualitative and arts-based methods to investigate
, manufacturing curricula need to provide more emphasis onsustainability issues, including green engineering,21 not only at an undergraduate level, but alsofor graduate students.22 Incorporating biomass processing and utilization into engineering andtechnology curricula is one way to do this.7 In this vein, there has been a growing interest. Forexample, student research projects on bio-based polymers,23 and laboratory experiencesexamining biodegradability behavior of polymers24 have been discussed. Beyond these,unfortunately, there is a surprising lack of discussion regarding the manufacture of biologicalmaterials in terms of educational opportunities for curricular enhancement.The research literature, on the other hand, is rich with many examples of
session.As mentioned briefly the panelists in this panel are representative of different positions withinthe academic environment as well as diverse administrative responsibilities. Represented on thepanel are a lecturer, assistant professor, associate professor, professor of practice and two fullprofessors. The administrative responsibilities of the panelists vary with their institution butinclude assistant chair to the department, undergraduate advising, graduate student advising,assisting with University Strategic Planning and Budget, Associate Dean for UndergraduateEducation and Interim Dean of the College of Engineering. The institutions that wererepresented by the panelists selected included four R1 research institutions with the other
review issues specific to teaching of statistics so thatthis course could incorporate best practices including the use of a Web site to extend learning3and including small-group cooperative learning.42 Methods IRB approval was obtained for this study and efforts were made to protect the students’interests. For example, the instructor did not have access to any study data not regularly used forinstructional purposes until the final course grades were submitted and only had access toanonymized data (names removed). Each of methods used to probe students’ learning and use ofinstructional technology is described the following sections.2.1 Self-report Surveys Students in BME 335 completed several surveys. For the items described in
updated student standards, rapidly changing impacts of artificial intelligence (AI), andan increasing number of school systems requiring a CS class for graduation. In order to preparefor these changes – as well as to address the equity issues that have plagued CS since its inception– we engaged in a project designed to reimagine content and pathways for high school CSeducation. As a collaborative project, we hosted multiple events for relevant parties (includingK-12 educators and administrators, higher education faculty, industry professionals, state anddistrict CS supervisors, and CS education researchers). These events were designed tocollaboratively seek input for the creation of a series of reports recommending what a CS coursethat satisfies
small proportion of students majoring inhigh-demand fields such as engineering. The National Science Foundation(NSF) reports that 39% of URMs "plan to major" in science and engineeringfields as freshman, but less than half of these earn an undergraduateengineering degree; rates are startlingly lower for Blacks and Hispanics.One way to increase retention and graduation rates in engineering for allstudents is to enhance their overall skills and readiness for engineering-related work by way of cooperative education (i.e., co-op) and internships1that offer students "real-life, hands on" experience in their major subject. TheCenter for Postsecondary Research at Indiana University identifies suchexperiences as a "high-impact practice" that likely
Paper ID #19225The Development and Evaluation of Expert Witness Role Play Instruction forTeaching Engineering EthicsMs. Alison J. Kerr, University of Tulsa Alison Kerr is a graduate student at The University of Tulsa. She is pursuing a doctoral degree in Industrial-Organizational Psychology. Her research interests include training development and evaluation as explored across a variety of academic disciplines and organizational settings. She is currently assist- ing on a number of training projects aimed at developing engineering students on relevant non-technical professional skills including ethical practice and
a wide variety of courses including data structures, computer architecture and organization, software development, and the senior capstone project. His re- search interests include communication and critical thinking skills in computer science education, and the impact of technology on work/home boundary management. He received his Ph.D. from Polytechnic University in Brooklyn, NY. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Evaluating the Collaboration between a Software Project Management Course and a Software Development Course in Terms of Student Learning and ExperienceAbstractThe ability to manage software teams and the ability to productively
experiences is widely understood as an essential component oflearning and development of expertise for both educators and students. However, incorporatingreflection in a way that engages engineering students can be challenging, and educators seekways to design or introduce effective and efficient reflective practices that best address this issue.In this paper, we describe three example case studies that use the concept of probes and weanalyze their potential for stimulating reflection to help identify new ways of supportingreflection in engineering education. Our goal is to introduce engineering educators to the conceptof probes as a method to support students’ reflection and also to inspire and facilitatecollaboration between engineering educators
Paper ID #16325Pre- and Post-Class Student Viewing Behaviors for Recorded Videos in anInverted Sophomore Mechanics CourseDr. Shawn P. Gross, Villanova University Dr. Shawn P. Gross is an associate professor in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Villanova University. He has as M.S.E. and Ph.D. degrees in Civil Engineering from the University of Texas at Austin, and a B.S.E. degree from Tulane University. He teaches undergraduate and graduate courses on mechanics and structural design (reinforced concrete, structural steel, masonry, and wood).Dr. David W Dinehart, Villanova University Professor and Chairman
faculty chooses the session to be used and notifies the INSPIRE directoraccordingly.Non-engineering related sessions are conducted by a combination of the program director,graduate students, and alumni of the engineering school or consultants depending on the sessionobjectives, resource availability and expertise, and effectiveness. These sessions provide theparticipants with information on what it really takes to be prepared to major in engineering,exposure to various work environments of practicing engineers as well as an assessment of theirlearning styles.Minimum course taking guidelines for graduation requirements have been enacted by manystates in the U.S. since the early 1980s. These minimum course taking standards are usuallyconsistent
previously been written with chalk on a chalkboard. Hieband Ralston 7 provide a detailed presentation of how DyKnow and Tablet PCs were used in thisinitial deployment.All faculty teaching mathematics now fully embrace the use of Tablet PCs and DyKnow andconfirm that the effort has been successful because the department took the approach of firstsimply using Tablet PCs and DyKnow to replicate established and familiar classroom practices.The creation of framework notes (or skeleton notes) was a logical progression for using TabletPCs and DyKnow in a way that existing research indicated had positive impacts for teaching andlearning. Only after replicating established practices did faculty feel comfortable leveraging thepower of Tablet PCs and DyKnow
unique local foundation to distinguishthemselves from competitors. Indeed, unified by the statewide curriculum frameworks andnational industry models and directives, program leaders have an opportunity to work togetheron a cohesive core curriculum, and concentrate on differentiating content in response to localneeds. Likewise, program leaders can collaborate to share strategies for working closely withindustry, attracting full time students, maintaining state-of-the-art facilities, and addressingserious faculty shortage issues—all challenges common to regional programs.Next steps for this research involve translating the findings for a number of practical audiences.For example, our works here suggest that that we should investigate best
, Environmental, and Architectural Engineering (CEAE). She has served as the Associate Chair for Under- graduate Education in the CEAE Department, as well as the ABET assessment coordinator. She was also the faculty director of the Sustainable By Design Residential Academic Program at CU, a living-learning community where interdisciplinary students learn about and practice sustainability. Bielefeldt is currently the chair of ASEE’s Community Engagement Division and a member of the AAAS Committee on Sci- entific Freedom and Responsibility.She is also a licensed P.E. Professor Bielefeldt’s research interests in engineering education include service-learning, sustainable engineering, social responsibility, ethics, and
professor in physics at the University of Maryland in the Physics Education Research (PER) Group. Turpen’s work involves designing and researching contexts for learn- ing within higher education (for both students and faculty). Her research draws from perspectives in an- thropology, cultural psychology, and the learning sciences. Through in-situ studies of classroom practice and institutional practice, she focuses on the role of culture in science learning and educational change. She pursues projects that have high potential for leveraging equitable change in undergraduate STEM pro- grams and she makes these struggles for change a direct focus of her research efforts. She also serves on several national leadership bodies
worked as a graduate research assistant with the Center for Engineering Education and Outreach. She graduated from North Carolina State University as a Park Scholar with a BA in Physics, and spent several years teaching physics to high-school freshman. Amber’s primary research interests include K-12 teacher professional development for integrated STEM curricula and elementary student engineering design thinking and prac- tices. When she is not at work, Amber enjoys spending time with her family designing games, building LEGO, and fabricating costumes.Daniel Gordon Mendiola Bates, NCSU STEM Education Daniel is a doctoral student at NCSU, in the STEM Education Department: Technology, Engineering, and Design
engineering-focused teacher practitioner articles, chapters, and research articles, and presents her research regularly through the ASEE Pre-College Engineering Education Division, a division she has chaired. Her current research includes investigating how children plan, fail, and productively persist; how mixed-reality simulated classroom environments can be used to help pre-service and in-service teachers practice facilitating challenging discussions in science and engineering; and how undergraduate engineering design teaching assistants address (and may be able to practice addressing) team conflict within similar simulated environments. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024
research initiativesshould be prioritized, incorporating standardized assessment frameworks, cross-institutionalstudies, long-term impact evaluation, and detailed cost-benefit analysis. These interconnectedrecommendations provide a framework for sustainable and equitable AI integration inengineering education. ConclusionThis WIP study demonstrates the transformative potential of AI tools in engineering educationwhile providing concrete implementation frameworks and evidence-based success metrics. Theintegration of theoretical foundations with practical implementation strategies offers institutionsa clear pathway for adoption. Meta-analyses indicate that properly implemented AI tools cansignificantly
Paper ID #8602Engineering Education Outside the Classroom: Informal Learning Environ-ments as Settings for Engineering Education for both the Public and Engi-neersCanek Moises Luna Phillips, Purdue University, West Lafayette Canek Phillips is a graduate student in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University-West Lafayette and works as a graduate assistant in Dr. Alice Pawley’s Research in Feminist Engineering Lab. He holds a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Rice University and an M.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Colorado State University. His research is focused on how people relate knowledge in engineering
AC 2012-4677: AN APPROACH TO INCORPORATING SUSTAINABIL-ITY IN A MANUFACTURING ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY PROGRAMDr. Rex C. Kanu, Ball State University Rex C. Kanu is Coordinator of the Manufacturing Engineering Technology program.Ms. Pamela Elizabeth Betz, Ball State University Pamela Elizabeth Betz is a graduate student, having received a master’s of arts in adult and community education from Ball State University and currently working toward an Ed.D. in adult, higher, and commu- nity education at Ball State. She is currently an instructor of agriculture at Ivy Tech Community College, Marion, Ind.Dr. Samuel Cotton, Ball State University Samuel Cotton has been with the Department of Technology for 20 years, specializing
beused and how to configure the apparatus to minimize the resulting error. Embedding thisuncomplicated technique in a spreadsheet environment is very helpful to the student sincespreadsheets are the natural experimental platform for data presentation and reduction, and thissoftware already possesses various statistical packages. The details of an example with fourdegrees of freedom are documented.I. IntroductionIn 1992, University of Wyoming’s College of Engineering completed an internal review inwhich a questionnaire was sent to alumni who graduated in the last decade 1. Most reported thatthey were adequately prepared to compete with their colleagues but recommended that more“real world” engineering tasks be incorporated in future curriculums
and practice from mathematics, science,and technology. The term “design” is used because problem solutions typically require thecreation or modification of artifacts or procedures used by humans in dealing with the physicalenvironment.One common method in engineering design courses is Problem Based Learning (PBL) approach.PBL is a teaching method in which complex real-world problems can promote student learningof concepts and principles as opposed to direct presentation of facts and concepts. In addition tocourse content, PBL can promote the development of critical thinking skills, problem-solvingabilities, and communication skills. It can also provide opportunities for working in groups,finding and evaluating research materials, and life