53 1 = no gain to ICR: α = 0.95 (research Doctoral Research 5 = great gain comprehension and students Learning communication skills), α Assessment = 0.92 (practical research (ERLA) - skills), α = 0.86 (research Trainee scale ethics), α = 0.091 (research identity), α = 0.91 (research confidence and independence), α = 0.92 (equity and inclusion awareness and
Paper ID #41887Mechanical Engineering Sustainability Curricular Content and Bachelor’sDegrees Awarded to WomenDr. Angela R Bielefeldt, University of Colorado Boulder Angela Bielefeldt is a professor at the University of Colorado Boulder in the Department of Civil, Environmental, and Architectural Engineering (CEAE) and Director of the Integrated Design Engineering program. Her research interests include ethics, social responsibility, sustainability, and community engagement.Ms. Joan Tisdale, University of Colorado Boulder Joan Tisdale holds degrees in both Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering from Auburn University and MIT
are also a very important aspect of the course, as they guide in the design ofthe course and projects by focusing on what skills students should develop throughout thecourse. After completing the course and the project, students should be able to: (1) design andimplement a solution to an open-ended engineering problem that involves both hardware andsoftware designs; (2) use simulation and measurement tools to devise a test and validation plan;(3) document and present detailed engineering design process of the project solution; (4)recognize and assess the ethical issues and societal impacts of the designs and solutions.4. Wireless Sensor Node ProjectThe project was inspired to provide a possible solution to notify first responders whenever
Components into CurriculumTo bridge the gap between the curriculum and new concepts and industrial needs, manyresearchers tried to embed these topics in their curriculum through different methodologies.Examples of these efforts include embedding sustainability, [10], [11], and ethics [12], in theengineering curriculum as well as embedding the design thinking in a multidisciplinaryengineering curriculum, [13]. To help educational institutions bridge this gap, many professionalengineering organizations offered grants to help educational institutions integrate industrialstandards. A good example is the grants provided by the National Institute of Standard andTechnology (NIST) through the Standards Coordination Office’s Curricula DevelopmentCooperative
realistic engineering systems under faculty supervision. Projects include safety,economic, environmental, and ethical considerations and require written and oral reports.EGR 483: Entrepreneurship in Engineering Design (0-1-0)Pre-requisites: EGR 482 and EGR 487Student seminars and advising for assessment of business plans related to entrepreneurship andinnovation in an engineering design project; participation in seminars, competitions or regionaland national conferences. Seminar attendance is required to obtain a satisfactory course grade.This course is graded S/U.EGR 488: Engineering Design Exhibit II (0-6-2)Prerequisite: EGR 487.Continuation of EGR 487 multi-disciplinary design projects with substantial engineering content.Small groups design
to the ABET EC2000 [3] transformation in the engineering curriculummoving to competencies and outcomes.The American Board of Engineering and Technology (ABET) Engineering Criterion 3outlines the student outcomes expected of graduates from an accredited engineeringprogram [3]. These outcomes include the ability to identify, formulate, and solve complexengineering problems; apply engineering design to produce solutions that consider publichealth, safety, welfare, and various global, cultural, social, environmental, and economicfactors; effectively communicate with various audiences; recognize ethical and professionalresponsibilities and make informed judgments; function effectively in a team setting andprovide leadership, establish goals, plan
Agricultural Education,Communications and Leadership. Her research interests include ethics in leadership andagricultural communications, as well as academic integrity and ethical issues in agriculturalcommunications. Her other duties include serving as the Communications Director for the OSUNew Product Development Center.Paul WecklerDr. Weckler an Associate Professor in the Department of Biosystems and AgriculturalEngineering. He is a registered, professional engineer with over twenty years experience inelectromechanical system design. His responsibilities include: teaching undergraduate andgraduate level courses (including the capstone senior design project courses), and conductingProceedings of the 2009 Midwest Section Conference of the American
phenomena. A system that illuminates humanity‟s scientific, moral, aesthetic, and religious experience, for example, is superior to one that only illuminates science.”15 The historic Christian viewpoint accounts for the vast array of realities in nature and in human experience, including the universe, abstract entities, ethics, human beings, and religious phenomena.16 Systems engineering is the synthesis of diverse information and resources into a combination of complex subsystems that work together as a unified whole to solve some problem or accomplish some purpose. A systems engineering mindset is useful in thinking about the power and scope of a worldview because diverse elements of the worldview must come together to form a
. Instructors wrestled with studentfrustration and the reality that good projects were tough to come by and an engineer’s“final design” could always be modified by a client.In 2000, the classroom and the capstone design components of this course began tochange. Planning and Design of Construction Projects continued to consist of two 50minute classroom sessions each week and two three hour laboratory periods per week. Toenhance student achievement of various educational outcomes and better meet the needsof the Coast Guard, the classroom portion of the course expanded its focus to coverlecture topics that can be assigned to six broad categories: 1. Planning 2. Cost Estimating 3. Scheduling 4. Engineering Economics 5. Engineering Ethics
thinking, systems engineering and systems decision making throughout a career of professional excellence and service to the nation as an officer in the United States Army. Outcome 1.1: Define the problem, design solutions, make decisions, and implement the chosen engineering solution within a broad global and societal context. Outcome 1.2: Act professionally and ethically as a leader of character within each stage of the system lifecycle. Objective 2: Produce graduates who effectively lead interdisciplinary teams in Joint, Combined, inter-agency, and multicultural environments. Outcome 2.1: Lead and work effectively as a contributing member of multidisciplinary systems engineering teams
Biology classes. Our focus was on three Biology courses (BIO 103, BIO 201, and BIO202), and we utilized various assessment tools to measure student performance and engagement.By doing that, we aim to reveal the nuanced effects of hands-on learning on students learningand interest in Biology.The study is a quantitative descriptive study that focuses on a particular group in a pre-test andpost-test design. This study adopted purposeful sampling in selecting the classes where ECPwould be implemented. The inclusion criteria for participants are full-time students enrolled infoundational courses in Biology and willingness to allow classroom observation of activities aswell as recording these activities. Ethical clearance was issued by the Morgan State
ofAI tools raises concerns about plagiarism rates and the ethical use of technology in academicsettings. Educational institutions are actively crafting policies to navigate the complexities ofGenAI usage while maintaining academic integrity [2], [3].Recent advancements in GenAI have ushered in a new era for educational methodologies,offering innovative tools for learning and teaching. Integrating GenAI tools such as ChatGPTand MidJourney into educational practices is becoming increasingly common, with these toolspredicted to become as ubiquitous as traditional software like Microsoft Excel in the near future[4]. The emergence of GenAI necessitates reevaluating pedagogical strategies, suggesting a shifttowards technology-integrated learning
-dominatedenvironments and pursuing male leadership models. Figure 1. Critical engineering skills for facing challenges and seizing opportunities.Significant disparities become apparent when discussing gaps between industry demands andthe skills possessed by engineering graduates. Previous studies have identified criticaldeficiencies in areas such as effective communication, teamwork, management and decision-making, ethical leadership, and social responsibility within the engineering field. Engineersoften encounter challenges applying these soft skills in dynamic work environments,underscoring the pressing need to address these discrepancies during academic training.The ability to communicate effectively and collaborate in multidisciplinary teams is
differentproblem scenarios: model and construction of a scale prototype of a Hyperloop vehicle [46] runin the 2019 academic year and create a working prototype of an assistive robotic arm, done in the2022 academic year. After ethics approval, text was extracted from PDF and Word documents,followed by minor preprocessing and splitting using the spaCy library 1.Annotation and Dataset Preparation:Manual annotation was initially performed by one of the authors, and ambiguous cases werediscussed with the course instructor. Human annotation is a time and resource-consuming taskthat can limit the size of the fine-tuning dataset. To expedite annotation validation, we employedGPT version 4.0 for comparison, addressing discrepancies between human and GPT
., [4-6]) and only recently it has been proposed to be used in thecommunication, teamwork, and the ability to recognize and assessment of professional skills [7-9].resolve ethical dilemmas), and (ii) awareness skills (i.e., This paper is organized into four sections. First, a summaryunderstanding the impact of global and social factors, of current assessment techniques for teamwork skills, and aknowledge of contemporary issues, and the ability to dolifelong learning) [2
discussthe multiple-section Project Lab and the associated Design Projects. Part Three will discuss howthe Lecture and Project Lab build towards the last half of the semester with the Grand DesignChallenge project and competition.THE PREVIOUS COURSE Prior to Fall 2005, Hofstra Engineering required First-Year students to take ENGG 9A -Introduction to Engineering, a 2 credit lecture-only course meeting twice a week. The maincomponents were the typical subjects taught over the past two decades, namely engineeringproblem solving, introductory information outlining the various types of Engineering majors,along with overview material on a variety of topics such as ethics, design, statistics, computerprogramming, plotting, and report writing. Two or
. Instructors wrestled with studentfrustration and the reality that good projects were tough to come by and an engineer’s“final design” could always be modified by a client.In 2000, the classroom and the capstone design components of this course began tochange. Planning and Design of Construction Projects continued to consist of two 50minute classroom sessions each week and two three hour laboratory periods per week. Toenhance student achievement of various educational outcomes and better meet the needsof the Coast Guard, the classroom portion of the course expanded its focus to coverlecture topics that can be assigned to six broad categories: 1. Planning 2. Cost Estimating 3. Scheduling 4. Engineering Economics 5. Engineering Ethics
thinking, systems engineering and systems decision making throughout a career of professional excellence and service to the nation as an officer in the United States Army. Outcome 1.1: Define the problem, design solutions, make decisions, and implement the chosen engineering solution within a broad global and societal context. Outcome 1.2: Act professionally and ethically as a leader of character within each stage of the system lifecycle. Objective 2: Produce graduates who effectively lead interdisciplinary teams in Joint, Combined, inter-agency, and multicultural environments. Outcome 2.1: Lead and work effectively as a contributing member of multidisciplinary systems engineering teams
. Instructors wrestled with studentfrustration and the reality that good projects were tough to come by and an engineer’s“final design” could always be modified by a client.In 2000, the classroom and the capstone design components of this course began tochange. Planning and Design of Construction Projects continued to consist of two 50minute classroom sessions each week and two three hour laboratory periods per week. Toenhance student achievement of various educational outcomes and better meet the needsof the Coast Guard, the classroom portion of the course expanded its focus to coverlecture topics that can be assigned to six broad categories: 1. Planning 2. Cost Estimating 3. Scheduling 4. Engineering Economics 5. Engineering Ethics
get caught up in these little bubbles. When you die, your bubble stops because your body [is]obsolete and becomes dated and we now need a new version. Versus building a legacy as to, you're leaving a footprint where people remember not just the title of the name, the person. That’s why I say, I'm unapologetically me. ~ Lola, Black/African American• Recall that EM is considered a cognitively based phenomena. Specifically, cognition – the way one thinks and metacognition – how one thinks about thinking.• This includes growth mindset, resourcefulness, and ethical and social responsibility but in our sample, this also represented the negative thought processes experiences by participants such as stereotype threat and imposter
higher for females highlight theirheightened sensitivity and responsiveness to environmental issues, which could be linked to amore empathetic and caretaking disposition.Conversely, male students scored higher in Basic Determinism, Religious Traditionalism, andGender Traditionalism. Higher scores in Basic Determinism suggest that male students are moreinclined to see the world in terms of fixed rules and predictable outcomes, which might makethem less flexible in adapting to new or uncertain situations. Increased scores in ReligiousTraditionalism for male students indicate a stronger adherence to traditional religious beliefs andpractices, which could influence their moral and ethical decision-making processes. Thesignificantly higher scores in
learning environments, computer science education, and Artificial IntelligenceDr. Laura E Brown, Michigan Technological UniversityDr. Jon Sticklen, Michigan Technological University Jon Sticklen is an Associate Professor with the Engineering Fundamentals Department (EF) and Affiliated Faculty with the Department of Cognitive and Learning Sciences (CLS). He served as Chair of EF from 2014-2020, leading a successful effort to design aDr. AJ Hamlin, Michigan Technological University AJ Hamlin is a Principle Lecturer in the Department of Engineering Fundamentals at Michigan Technological University, where she teaches first-year engineering courses. Her research interests include engineering ethics, spatial visualization
to analyze and interpret datac. An ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needsd. An ability to function on multidisciplinary teamse. An ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problemsf. An understanding of professional and ethical responsibilityg. An ability to communicate effectivelyh. The broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global and societal contexti. A recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in life-long learningj. A knowledge of contemporary issuesk. An ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice.The Tiny House project helped the capstone students achieve nine of the
ofmaking design decisions in economic, environmental, and societal contexts is emphasized from theperspectives of engineering and physical and mental health.“The Intersection of Society and Design” explicitly addresses four societal impact outcomes in ABETCriterion 3: Student Outcomes 2, 3, 4, 5, which emphasize the public health and safety impacts ofdesign, ethical decision-making, collaborative productivity as a team member, and effectivecommunication with diverse audiences [2].Increasingly professionals in all fields are called upon to present technical concepts of their disciplinesto a non-technical audience [3]. Juan Felipe Pulido wrote that I wish I’d known that being an engineer involves more than just engineering—more than
actionimproves learning [12]. However, the instructor sometimes intervened and slightly altered thecomposition of the groups to ensure a proper and balanced mix of students in terms of academicsand work ethics among other factors.Each group was requested to seek and list three initial real highway problems as possible themesfor the projects. As seen later, a single theme would be established as the research topic of theproject for each group based on certain criteria in consultation with the instructor. Each groupwould briefly present its three possible highway problems to the entire class.One of the criteria in choosing the candidate highway problem that would be under investigationwas its location. Safety was a concern with a paramount significance
propose solutions that demonstrate a deep comprehension of the problem, considering ethical, logical, and 0.0267 Yes cultural dimensions. I thoroughly evaluate the potential solutions to a problem, including feasibility and impact. 0.0157 Yes I implement solutions that thoroughly address the problem and relevant contextual factors. 0.0135 Yes I review the outcomes of implemented solutions with specific considerations for further work. 0.00174 Yes I acquire and adapt strategies and skills within a
. The following learning outcomes are what the course was designed around: 1- Be able to applyTRIZ problem solving to novel problems, and Manufacturing Design Principles and Human-Centered Design principles to projects, 2- Be able to identify, formulate, and solve engineeringproblems and to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineeringpractice, and 3- To understand the ethical responsibility. Nine lectures were developed, where each was designed to last three hours (with the labcomponent), and four labs were held throughout the semester that were designed to reinforce keylearning concepts. The lectures and the labs are shown in Table 1. Table 1. The nine lectures and the four labs that were held
another (remote learning) occurred.Something that is not able to be explicitly stated from the survey data is the impact of theconnection with our students. The authors all had the same personal conclusion that, although wewanted more, the sense of connection via Teams with our students was as vital to our well-beingin this uncertain time as we hope it was for our students. This approach provided the opportunityto continue to make “constructive utterances” and ensure we all had “enough turn taking” tohave a positive experience.ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSThe authors want to acknowledge our students! Throughout this unprecedented series of events,we are incredibly proud of their work ethic and perseverance, as well as their steadfast resolve tobecome the
information needs, consider them thoughtfully,incorporate stakeholder feedback into project design where possible, and communicateeffectively and ethically. This course addresses an emerging and important aspect of civilengineering practice and is breaking new ground in engineering education.References[1] "Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge: Preparing the Future Civil Engineer," American Society of Civil Engineers, 2019.[2] Linda Geppert, "Educating the Renaissance Engineer," Spec, vol. 32, pp. 39-43, Sep 1, 1995.[3] ABET. Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2022 – 2023. Available: https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting- engineering-programs-2022-2023/.[4] R. D. Bullard, "Solid Waste