Foroudastan’s teaching experience, he also has performed extensive research and published numerous technical papers. He has secured more than $2 million in the form of both internal and external grants and research funding. Foroudastan is the faculty advisor, coordinator, and primary fundraiser for EVP teams entering national research project competitions such as the Formula SAE Collegiate Competition, the Baja SAE Race, the SolarBike Race, the Great Moonbuggy Race, and the Solar Boat Collegiate Competition. For his concern for and dedication to his students, Foroudastan received MTSU awards such as the 2002-03 Outstanding Teaching Award, the 2005-06 Outstanding Public Service Award, and the 2007 Faculty Advisor of the
Paper ID #25081Solar Powered Aquaponics: Modeling Real World Solutions through Engi-neering TechnologyMr. Sean Glen Wood, University of Houston, Downtown Glen earned his bachelor’s degree in Controls and Instrumentation Engineering Technology with a minor in Sustainability from the University of Houston-Downtown, Houston, Texas, in 2018, graduating Summa Cum Laude. Glen was heavily involved in the Center for Urban Agriculture and Sustainability at the University, participating in multiple research projects that emphasized sustainable technologies in the urban setting. He is currently working for Shell as a member of the
) have beenincorporated with AIRSPACES (Autonomous Instrumented Robotic Sensory Platforms toAdvance Creativity and Engage Students) project supported by Maryland Space GrantConsortium. Broad goals of the project are aligned with USDA’s “environmentally friendlyagriculture” and NASA’s “earth science” mission objectives.As part of the AIRSPACES project, the UMES team has developed and integrated autonomousplatforms such as autonomous boats, autonomous ground robots, as well as unmanned aerialsystems, to advance sustainable agricultural practices.Farmbot, a small autonomous farming machine, has been recently acquired by the “SmartFarming” and “AIRSPACES” project team at UMES for conducting precision farming fieldexperiments on a small scale. The
Washington University Todd Morton has been teaching the upper level embedded systems and senior project courses for Western Washington University’s Electronics Engineering Technology(EET) program for 25 years. He has been the EET program coordinator since 2005 and also served as department chair from 2008-2012. He is the author of the text ’Embedded Microcontrollers’, which covers assembly and C programming in small real-time embedded systems and has worked as a design engineer at Physio Control Corporation and at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory as an ASEE-NASA Summer Faculty Fellow. He has a BSEE and MSEE from the University of Washington. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017A
class projects. Cross-disciplinary experiences betweenengineering and education students have shown potential to help students developcommunication skills [3, 4]. In addition, students develop self-efficacy in their discipline throughparticipating in cross-disciplinary experiences [5]. Cross-disciplinary experiences also helpstudents learn to value expertise outside their area of study and appreciate the limitations andconstraints of information in other fields [6]. Course instructors can also benefit from sharingresponsibility for a course and learning about other disciplines [7].The unfamiliarity of cross-disciplinary activities can lead to frustrations despite their manybenefits. Students often struggle to connect topics from other
Waste Technologies, and Environmental Engineering Seminar. LTC Starke has published over 10 peer reviewed research arti- cles and has presented his research at national and international meetings (most recently Portugal). Most recently, he led a service learning project with 5 students to build a latrine-based biogas system in west- ern Uganda for an elementary school of 1400 students. LTC Starke is a registered Professional Engineer (Delaware), member of several professional associations, and is a member of the National Council of Examiners for Engineers and Surveyors (NCEES).Lt. Col. Phil Dacunto P.E., U.S. Military Academy LTC Phil Dacunto is an Assistant Professor of Environmental Engineering at the United States
Page 26.147.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Active-learning for Physics (Electromagnetism) teachers in an Engineering Course ABSTRACTStudents of Engineering have difficulties in the assimilation of the concepts explored inElectromagnetism and Waves. These difficulties begin with a lack of abstraction, especiallywhen seeking to understand the Electromagnetism concepts. Many active learningmethodologies and cases are presented in the literature for Classical Mechanics, but there arefew references to Electromagnetism and Waves. This study presents a PBL—Problem BasedLearning and a Project Based Learning—practice
Paper ID #16950Network Analysis of Interactions between Students and an Instructor duringDesign MeetingsDr. Kathleen Quardokus Fisher, Oregon State University Dr. Kathleen Quardokus Fisher is a postdoctoral scholar at Oregon State University. She is currently participating in a project that supports the use of evidence-based instructional practices in undergraduate STEM courses through developing communities of practice. Her research interests focus on understanding how organizational change occurs in higher education with respect to teaching and learning in STEM courses.Dr. Laura Hirshfield, University of Michigan
, 2019 Work In Progress: Best Practices in Teaching a Chemical Process Design Two-course Sequence at a Minority Serving UniversityIntroductionStudents complete their capstone design experience in the Chemical Process Design II and IIIsequence of courses in chemical engineering at Texas A&M University-Kingsville (TAMUK), aHispanic-serving institution (HSI). Three principle objectives of this process design coursesequence are to instruct students in the development of a complete chemical process usingprocess simulators as a primary tool, to complete this project in a team-oriented environment,and to communicate effectively with their peers and instructors. These three principle objectivesare directly related to the ABET student
Learning, Agility, and a Focus on the individual.These values are related to the program mission as the program is built around the concept ofengaged learning: discovery-based education and learning by doing. Classrooms are defined notas lecture halls but as engineering studios. Courses are delivered not as lengthy exercises intheory but as integrated opportunities to apply knowledge in real-world projects. The expectedoutcome of the program is an agile engineer, a lifelong learner with a comprehensive set of skillsappropriate to the needs of today and tomorrow. Agility also characterizes the program itself:streamlined, purposeful and flexible in adapting to changes in pedagogy, knowledge or the needsof its stakeholders. We also express the brand
with bus schedules, real-time bus location and delayinformation so they can plan trips accordingly, and to provide useful information to thetransportation center for management purpose. The developed system has been tested anddemonstrated successfully.IntroductionThe presented work is the outcome of an undergraduate capstone project. Students in theComputer Engineering Technology (CET) major at Central Connecticut State University arerequired to finish a capstone project in their senior year study. The capstone project isaccomplished by successful taking two consecutive courses, Capstone Project I and CapstoneProject II. The Capstone Project I course is 1-credit in which students research, propose andfinalize project ideas. The Capstone
; in fact it is an old idea.The capstone experience in the Manufacturing Engineering program at UW-Stout is a two-semester course sequence. In the first course students experience the engineering design processby designing realistic products for manufacture. Design projects are managed by teams ofstudents, industry contacts and faculty advisors. The final detailed design is used in the secondcourse, where an automated manufacturing system is developed to produce the product.IntroductionUniversity of Wisconsin-Stout was founded on the educational principle that people learn best bydoing. In 1891 James H. Stout, a wealthy lumber baron, established the Stout Manual TrainingSchool to provide training and education “through which young people of
fuel cell course has three 1-hour lecture periods per week and one 3-hour lab period perweek to make a 4 credit-hour course. One lecture period per week is devoted to discussion ofrelevant papers, which serves to reinforce the technical content and facilitate discussion of thebroader social, economic, and technical issues. The lab periods are used alternately for additionalclassroom instruction, experiments, recitation time, and modeling or project work. This adds adegree of flexibility to administering the course and provides the students with extra time toengage and reflect on what they are learning.Student learning assessment is based on homework, experimental lab write-ups, a midterm exam,a nonlinear dynamic fuel cell model, and student
presented. The CAD projects vary widely, e.g. as characterized by the geometric features present in the parts,assembly structure, number of parts in the assembly, overall complexity, physical scale, industry represented, inaddition to coloring and other presentation and viewing issues. The primary purpose of this effort is to elegantlyshowcase the body of quality work generated in a relatively compact manner to permit an enjoyable perusal andreflection that may be of use to others teaching future CAD courses or others, such as students interested in CADwork in a BSME program. In addition, one can see the natural evolution of the course since it was first taught overthe past 3 ½ years. The projects demonstrate the application of CAD knowledge
as a full class and in small groups, andproblem- and project-based learning experiences (PBL). When the full class cooperates insolving a problem, all students get exposed to the different possible solution strategies fortackling a problem. Small groups allow students who may be hesitant to ask questions in front ofthe entire class an opportunity to ask questions of their peers or even of the instructor in a moreprivate setting. The use of PBL reinforces the concept that multiple strategies for approaching aproblem are possible. Students are asked to produce a specific outcome, such as the developmentof a reduced order model, but they are not told what method or approach to use for this process.At the end, the students must evaluate the
courses leading to a minor in mathematics. Communication, Interpersonal, and Leadership Skills – Special attention is given to the development of students’ communication, interpersonal and leadership skills. Writing and presentations skills are practiced and developed in many courses, as are discussion, speaking, and teamwork skills. Undergraduate Research – Engineering students have the opportunity to participate in undergraduate research projects supervised by individual faculty members. Life Long Learning – Engineering graduates are educated to become self-learners, life long learners, critical and creative thinkers, creative problem solvers, effective communicators and wise
1989 from Westmoreland County Community College, the B. S. in Mechanical Engineering Technology in 1991 from Penn State Erie, The Behrend College, and the M. S. in Manufacturing Systems Engineering from the University of Pittsburgh in 1998. Mr. Nitterright is a senior member of the Society of Manufacturing Engineers SME, and a member of the American Society for Engineering Education ASEE . Fred Nitterright began his career as a machinist at Elliott Support Services in Donora, Pennsylvania in 1986. He was employed as a computer-aided draftsman at Powerex, Inc, a project engineering at Stanko Products, a process engineer at Ami-Doduco, Inc., and a project engineer and team leader at Classic Industries, Inc., in
Collaborative Efforts in Engineering and Technology Education R. Sterkenburg, D.L. Stanley & J. Lampe Purdue UniversityAbstract - Over the last two years, Mechanical Engineering (ME) and Aviation Technology (AT)students at Purdue University have been collaborating and competing in several aviation relateddesign-build projects. This paper will describe three such projects: The Personal lifting vehicle(PLV), the lighter than air vehicle (Blimp), and the Hovercraft. Elements of collaboration,competition, and design-build strategies were utilized in an effort to increase student motivation.In the first project students of ME and AT worked together to design and
Making Industry Meaningful in College Dorene Perez, Jim Gibson, Rose Marie Lynch Illinois Valley Community CollegeMaking Industry Meaningful in College (MIMIC) is an innovative, multidisciplinarycurriculum project that places students from engineering design, electronics, and business intoentrepreneurial teams to select, design, prototype, manufacture, and market a product. Itspurpose is to provide students with opportunities to implement and sharpen their technical andother critical workplace skills in a simulated industrial setting. Pioneered at a comprehensivecommunity college, MIMIC is adaptable to a variety of disciplines and to a variety of schoolsettings from
Main Street, Ada, OH 45810, USA. m-launsbach@onu.edu6 J. T. Wagner, EE Undergraduate, 525 South Main Street, Ada, OH 45810, USA. j-wagner@onu.edu7 K. J. Zwingler, ME Undergraduate, Unit 3594, 525 South Main Street, Ada, OH 45810, USA. k-zwingler@onu.eduASEE Annual Conference, Salt Lake City, UT, USA. June 20-23, 2004works two to three days a week in the EiR office at ONU and the remaining time atMAP’s headquarters located in Findlay, Ohio.The EiR serves two functions. The first is as a supervisor, handing out assignments andkeeping track of the progress of those projects. The EiR also functions as a mentor –training, explaining and instructing the students about MAP, job responsibilities
and organizational issues (Vaughn, D, 1996).In addition to crisis cases, where the AEC student is backed into a dilemma late in the designprocess that involves whistle-blowing and resignation as possible options, there is a need for casesinvolving preventive measures early in the design and construction process. The advancedtechnology has created enormous environmental, social, and cultural stresses, and enormousopportunities for improving the quality of projects. Often AECs fail to see their part in this bigpicture. But then who designs energy systems that can be efficient and environmentally sensitive,manage the project with safety and quality or use up valuable natural resources and producepollution? Ethical choices in construction are
Session #: 1526 Wireless Communications Model Program Development Michael Qaissaunee, (mqaissaunee@brookdalecc.edu) Brookdale Community College Newman Springs Road Lincroft, NJ 07738 732-224-2879 This work is supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant Number DUE-0302909 ABSTRACTThe goal of this project is the modification of an existing Electronics Engineering TechnologyAssociate of
Session 1449 Integrating Instruction in Geographic Information Systems with a Civil Engineering Technology Curriculum William H. Sprinsky Pennsylvania College of TechnologyAbstractAt the Pennsylvania College of Technology, we feel that the tools of project design andmanagement, such as Geographic Information Systems (GIS), should be taught along with themore usual subjects in a Civil Engineering Technology curriculum. Such a tool is an applicationof some very basic concepts to design and construction. Students learn the use and constructionof coordinated
growing number of Federal agencies which is expressingconcern about its ability to meet its future workforce needs. A variety of strategies has beenproposed that address this situation. One of the approaches being considered is the establishmentof collaborative research connection with universities in areas of mutual interest. Two suchprojects involving Virginia Tech and the Naval Surface Warfare Center in Dahlgren, Virginia, aredescribed in detail including a discussion of benefits from both the points of view of the Universityand the Center. These projects as well as others which are more briefly described representexamples of ways in which university research connections could be used as a part of ananticipated nation-wide Navy R&D Center
engineeringexperience comprising field-specific information sessions, panel discussions, team andleadership building, hands-on activities, all focusing on a complex, multi-disciplinary project.The CURIE 2000 project was a water quality management problem that highlighted technical,social, political, and economic aspects of “real life” engineering. The project was created anddelivered by a graduate student in Civil and Environmental Engineering, with support from fiveundergraduate Program Assistants who facilitated the group interactions and provided socialmentoring for the girls. The challenges and rewards of such an ambitious project were plentiful.The CURIE experience not only increased the girls’ awareness of the opportunities and technicalchallenges in
fundamentals of astructural system. By organizing the session in this way, the students are eager to learn what wasright and what went wrong with their design process!The first architectural design studio is conducted in the second semester of the first year of study.Like all architectural design studios at OSU, this is a six credit hour course which meets forsixteen hours a week. In this course, students undertake a variety of simple design problemsaimed at increasing their intuitive sense of order and design logic. The course begins with aseries of abstract design problems demonstrating ordering principles, patterns, and focal points.3D Nine Square Project Point, Line and Plane CompositionThese abstract problems
. Introduction to engineering design and decision-making. Christian world-view applied to engineering. Use of logic, experimental design and design criteria. Project oriented. Page 7.927.1 "Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2002, American Society for Engineering Education"The class meets for lecture two hours per week and for a weekly three hour laboratory period.In an audit of departmental objectives1 using the Levels of Learning (LoL) defined by Bellamyand McNeill2,3 it was determined that two of the objectives receiving special
construction workforce. Currently, he investigates the effect of a novel program to increase the retention of first-year undergraduate students enrolled in an engineering college. The program also aims at increas- ing engineering student success, enhancing the sense of community and belonging by the students, and improving the transfer of knowledge in the engineering disciplines. In order to succeed in his research endeavors, Dr. Grau frequently collaborates with social scientists and educators. Prior to his academic career, he worked for more than seven years both leading an engineering department and managing com- plex industrial projects in South and Central America, and Europe. He is a registered Industrial Engineer in
Officer at the National Academy of Engineering (NAE). Her portfo- lio is the Diversity of the Engineering Workforce program with a charge to provide staff leadership to the NAE’s efforts to enhance the diversity of the engineering workforce at all levels including the diversity of those being prepared to enter the future workforce. She is the project director of a $2 million dol- lar National Science Foundation grant to increase the number of women receiving baccalaureate degrees in engineering. In addition to her duties at NAE, in March of 2007 Didion became the Director of the Committee on Women in Science, Engineering, and Medicine. This is a standing committee with a new mandate to work as a focal point on gender
Classes?AbstractThe paper discusses two different challenges, presented in the form of two projects, as apart of the Introduction to Mechanical Design class at California State UniversityFullerton, using inductive techniques. The students take the theoretical ideas ofmechanical design and implement them with moderate guidance for the first project andlimited faculty involvement in the second project. We use techniques to uncover what thestudents are asking themselves as they try to solve each challenge, in order to asses theapproach and get ideas for possible enhancement. Based on these questions, the mainproject objectives: critical thinking, responsibility for students’ own learning andintellectual growth, are discussed. The approach itself is