the informationin an internal database.The collaborative capstone model, utilizing the graduate and under graduate studentpotential in the design, organization, management , program development and projectimplementation has not only proven effective but also promoted the excellentlearning opportunities among the project teams.Bibliography:[1] R. Balderas and S. Bose, “Automated Robotic Inspection System for Electronic Manufacturing”, MSE Thesis, Manufacturing Engineering Dept., UT-Pan American, 2002.[2] A.I. Edinbarough, Jose Amieva, “Experimental Study on the Robotics Vision Inspection of Electronic Components”, BS Thesis, Engineering Technology Department, UT-Brownsville, 2002.[3] S. Hata “Vision Systems for PCB Manufacturing in
initiation of the operation that will carryus through the next 80 lessons of the two semester program. As depicted in Figure 3, theoperation continues with a Reconnaissance of the Battlefield, Preparation of the Battlefield,Attack, and culminates in a Defense phase. Within each phase, the physics principles arepresented and discussed. Throughout the process we maintain a focus on the militaryapplication(s) to which these principles are relevant. Figure 3. Concept of the Operation for PH203/PH204 The order in which we fight the military operation also dictates, to some degree, the orderin which we present the physics principles. In most colleges and universities, the physicscourses begin with the introduction of vector
EmphasisCalvin’s engineering program has always had a design emphasis, first in our pre-engineeringprogram and since 1985 in our BSE program. When engineering education moved aggressivelytoward engineering science in the 1960’s and 1970’s, we kept our focus on design. We believewe have been a leader in having a design emphasis in engineering education. Currently, thedesign focus starts with the first course in engineering, in which students are required to do aservice learning project. The students work with real customers and produce and deliver actual Page 9.198.7 Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual
Research & Tiger Research (2001) “Too FewRooms: Residential Crowding in Native American Communities and Alaskan Native Villages,” CooperativeAgreement H-21257-RG with U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.11. Riley, D., Palleroni, S., Wing, S., Rios, Little Bear , R., Wertman, B., “Cooperative Agreement between ChiefDull Knife College and Penn State University and University of Washington.” 7/1/2003.12. Riley, D., Workman, E. “Applied Green-Building Technologies: An Interdisciplinary Public ScholarshipCourese,” Proceedings of the 2003 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition.12. “Student Reflections,” AIHI Course Assignment. Penn State University, University Park, 2003.13. “The World Class Engineer,” The Leonard Center: for the
Magnetics, v 33, n 2 pt 2, Mar, 1997, p 1986-1989Heitman, G. K., and Manseur, R., “Organization of a capstone design course,” In 30th Annual Conference Frontiersin Education 2000, FIE 2000, Vol.1, pp. F1C/1-F1C/5, Oct 2000.A. Leva, “A hands-on experimental laboratory for undergraduate courses in automatic control Education,” IEEETrans. Educ., vol. 46, pp. 263-272, May 2003.F. Buret, D. Muller, and L. Nicolas, “Computer-aided education for magnetostatics,” IEEE Trans. Educ., vol. 42, pp.45-49, Jan. 1999.Burnett, David S. “Finite Element Analysis From Concepts to Applications,”. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley, 1987.C. S. Desai, and J. F. Abel, “Introduction to the finite element method: A numerical approach for engineeringanalysis,” New York
link with industry the more interesting phase isreached where development and nurturing of the nexus must be take place to ensure thatbenefits flow to both all. The School is obviously a very interested stakeholder in addition tothe individual academic(s)Much has been written about the nexus between teaching and research in universities 1 andhow both contribute towards scholarship. Simplistically academics generate or createknowledge and then transfer it to students via the teaching process. Boyer 2 framesscholarship into the four areas of scholarship of discovery, scholarship of integration,scholarship of application and scholarship of teaching. In this paper however, the authors havetaken the more common model that scholarship encompasses
Session 1078 Faculty Technical Currency: Status Report on a National Survey of Engineering Technology Faculty Ahmed S. Khan DeVry University, Addison, IL 60101 Amin Karim DeVry University, Oakbrook Terrace, IL 60181 Gene Gloeckner George Morgan School of Education, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523 AbstractRapid technological growth has put new demands on engineering and engineeringtechnology
Session 1153 Impact of Vertically Integrated Team Design Projects on First Year Engineering Students Helen K. Qammar1, H. Michael Cheung1, Edward A. Evans1, Sandra Prettyman Spickard2, Francis S. Broadway3, Rex D. Ramsier4 Department of Chemical Engineering1/ Educational Foundations and Leadership2/ Department of Curricular and Instructional Studies3/ Departments of Physics, Chemistry, and Chemical Engineering4 The University of Akron Akron, Ohio
/2003).5. Madov, N., “Dá até para morar,” São Paulo: Veja, November 27, 2002.6. Rogar, S., “É novo? Eu quero,” São Paulo: Veja, April 30, 2003.7. Nogueira, S. A., “Pedofilia e tráfico de menores pela internet: o lado negro da web,” http://www.ambito- juridico.com.br/aj/eca0010.htm (access: 06/11/2003).8. Postman, N. and Asher, M, The Disappearance of Childhood. New York: Vintage Books, 1994. Page 9.1085.109. Boff, L., Saber cuidar: Ética do humano–compaixão pela terra, 9th ed. Petrópolis: Editora Vozes, 2003. Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition
University, Cleveland, OH.Deng X. and Jennings, A.A. (2003), “Evaluating an Electrokinetically-Driven Extraction method for Measuring Heavy Metal Soil Contamination, Journal of Environmental Engineering (in review).Hise S. (2003), Feral Battery Generation Rates and Chemical Release Properties, Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH.IDEM (Indiana Department of Environmental Management), (2001), “RISC Technical Resource Guidance Document”, Feb., www.in.gov/idem/land/risc/techguide/index.html.Kiedrowski, B. (2003), Experimental Analysis of Feral Battery Deterioration Rates, Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH.Jennings, A.A. , (2003a), Feral
Understand is to Invent”, Grossman, New York, 1973.4 Vygotsky,L., “Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes”, Harvard University Press, MA, 1978.5 Starrett,S., Morcos,M., “Hands-On, Minds-On Electric Power Education”, Journal of Engineering Education, Vol 90, No. 1, pp93-100, January 20016 Felder,R., Peretti,S., “A Learning Theory-Based Approach to the Undergraduate Laboratory”, ASEE Conference Proceedings, Session 2413 , June 19987 Pavelich,M.J., “Integrating Piaget’s Principles of Intellectual Growth into the Engineering Classroom”, Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference, pp719-722, 1984, Wash, DC8 Dale,E., “Audio-Visual Methods in Teaching”, 3rd Edition, Holt, Rinehart, and Winston
Copyright @ 2004, American Society for Engineering Education Session 3192WISE Advisory Council Members: WISE Director, chair of the WISE Administrative Council, faculty and staff (at least one) from each college, representative(s) from University Housing, current students, President of the WISE student body, one representative from The Science House, one representative from the College of Engineering K-12 Outreach Program, one representative from each of the K-12 Outreach Programs in Colleges of Agriculture and Life Sciences and Natural Resources, scientists and engineers from the Research Triangle Park and other external
. I feel the course materials and assignments have enough variety to keep me engaged.a) Strongly Agreeb) Agreec) Disagreed) Strongly Disagree9. The content of the course is well laid out on WebCT and is easy for me to navigate through.a) Strongly Agreeb) Agreec) Disagreed) Strongly Disagree Page 9.1047.12Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & ExpositionCopyright 2004, American Society for Engineering10. The Instructor provides clear direction(s) for the course.a) Strongly Agreeb) Agreec) Disagreed) Strongly Disagree11. The instructor is helpful and complete in answering questions I have.a) Strongly Agreeb
Comment Comment s Page 9.989.15 Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition Copyright ©2004, American Society for Engineering Education Number of Theme Group Comment Comment sGetting CARE I 6 It got me more interested and more aware about engineering.there It showed me some programs engineers used. Makes engineering even
place in the Department of Mechanical Engineering for manyyears to come. These projects will provide hands-on experiences illustrating anapplication of two emerging technologies to many engineering students and visitors whomight not otherwise have this opportunity. The paper will provide details for the designand fabrication of the demonstrations as well as pictures of the final products.IntroductionThe capstone design course in the Department of Mechanical Engineering (ME) at theUniversity of Houston has existed (until recently), more or less, in its present form since1981. At that time it was taken only by mechanical engineering undergraduates. In themid-80’s the Department of Industrial Engineering (IE) joined the course so that projectteams
and Humanities and Social Sciences Librarian, Allison Lewis - all fromthe W. W. Hagerty Library at Drexel University.References 1. ABET Accreditation. (2004, February 19). EAC Evaluation Criteria. Retrieved February 27, 2004, from http://www.abet.org/criteria.html 2. Manion, M., and Kam, M. (2000). Engineering Ethics at Drexel University. Proceedings of the 2000 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition: Session 2561. 3. Terry, R., Benzley, S., Hawks, V., and Judd, D. (1996). Incorporation of Technology based Aids for Teaching Engineering Ethics. Proceedings – Frontiers in Education Conference, v 3, Technology-Based Re-Engineering Engineering Education, pp. 1155-1158
Architecture (ACSA) Technology Conference, Cambridge MA.2. Johnson, B.R., (2002). Virtuality and Place. ACADIA 2002. Design Machine Group, University of Washington.3. Gross, M., E. Do, R. McCall, W. Citrin, P. Hamill, A. Warmack, and K. Kuczun. (1997). Collaboration and Coordination in Architectural Design: approaches to computer mediated work. TeamCAD symposium on collaborative CAD Graphics, Visualization, and Usability Center, Georgia Tech May 12-13, 1997. pp 17-24.4. Hui, S. C. M., Cheung, K. P. (1999). Developing a Web-based Learning Environment for Building Energy Efficiency and Solar Design in Hong Kong. Proc. of ISES Solar World Congress International Solar Energy Society, Jerusalem.5. Bentz, D. P. (2000). CEMHYD3D: A Three-Dimensional
. This is the common measure of diversity. In recent years, many people havebegun substituting the word “gender” for the word “sex” to represent the same concept. Sex isbiological, manifested in anatomy, hormones, and chromosomes, and naturally occurs in aprimarily dichotomous way. (I’ll leave the discussion of intersexuality to another paper.)Following the conventions of gender studies literature, I use the term “gender” to represent theidea which gives meaning to phrases like girly-girl, tomboy, 90’s kind of guy, manly man, bikerchick, frat boy, sorority chick, etc. Gender is socially constructed through national institutions,such as the media and education system, and through local interactions which reinforce certainbehaviors and punish
: Evolution, Not Revolution,” Quality in Higher Education,October, 1997. http://ex21.tech.purdue.edu/resources/qhe/Oct97.html.[3] Neff, G.P., Scachitti, S., and Higley, J.B., “Counting Down to 2004: Some Insights and Strategies for SatisfyingTC2K While There is Still Time,” Proceedings of the 2003 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Nashville,June 22nd -25th, 2003.[4] Neff, G.P., Scachitti, S., and Higley, J.B., “Counting Down to 2004: Some Insights and Strategies for SatisfyingTC2K While There is Still Time,” Proceedings of the 2003 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Nashville,June 22nd -25th, 2003.[5] Neff, G.P. and Roley, R., “Using the SME Certification Exam in TC2K or EC2000 Outcomes Assessment,”Proceedings of the ASME 2004 Conference for
Engineering(NAE) leadership2-4. In addition, the adoption of ABET Engineering Criteria 2000 hasintensified an interest in assessment of educational outcomes and promoted a recognition of theneed for changes in pedagogy to achieve the varied outcomes1.The National Science Foundation has supported educational scholarship in engineering since thelate 1980's through the Division of Undergraduate Education and the Engineering EducationCoalitions program. Today, NSF support for education reform that can be linked to engineeringis in excess of $200M per year. Such support "has increased the status of educational research infaculty performance reviews, improved its quality by demanding appropriate assessment ofresults, attracted additional engineering
Higher Education, p. A19, Feb. 9, 1996.11. Chen, J. C., M. Ellis, J. Lockhart, S. Hamoush, C. E. Bawner, J. G. Tront, “Technology in Engi- neering Education: What Do the Faculty Know and Want?” Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 89, No. 3, July 2000.12. Ercolano, V., “From Sleep to Success 101,” ASEE Prism, pp. 25-29, Sept. 1995.13. Fink, L. D., “Learning Portfolios Create Broader Awareness of Educational Achievements,” Spotlight on Teaching (OU Instructional Development Program’s newsletter), 21(1), March, 2001.14. Fink, L. D., “Sooner City: An Experiment in Design Across the Curriculum,” Spotlight on Teaching (OU Instructional Development Program newsletter devoted the April issue to Sooner City), 20(2), April 2000.15
the problem definition,procedure, pertinent data, analysis of data, final results, and your comments or group discussionsand observations. The analysis may include diagrams, assumptions, and the applications offundamental principles. Follow the “Laboratory Report Writing” guidelines. The formal reportmust be typed on a word processor. Microsoft Word is preferred along with Excel. Computersand the software are available in the Engineering Computer Rooms. Informal reports emphasizethe results and require a less stringent format and neatness. They can be hand-written in pencil.Written reports are due one week from the date that the experiment was performed. All reportsmust contain the data sheet(s) with the instructor’s initials to receive
over sevenyears at Morgan State University. The objective of this program are to (a) increase thenumber of students who participate in undergraduate research; (b) enhance student’slearning and commitment to their studies; (c) increase the number of students attendinggraduate schools; (d) and provide students with professional development training. Twohundred and thirty eight (238) students have participated in the program since itsinception. Out of the ninety-two participants since 1999 over 18% have gone on tograduate school.Introduction National concern have been expressed about the status of the U. S. science andengineering base-specifically the human talent, knowledge and infrastructure thatgenerate innovations and under gird
engineering.Therefore, in order to move the Freshman Engineering Program to a level of preeminence, wemust simultaneously address recruiting and retention issues (i.e., improve our capture rate of adiverse population of high achieving students and then retain them), as well as improve coursecontent, integration of content, and pedagogy. Pedagogical improvements in engineeringeducation have been facilitated by a large infusion of funding from NSF during the 1990’s,particularly for undergraduate programs.ConclusionIt is evident that there are significant and complex challenges to recruiting, retaining, educating,and preparing a highly diverse student population for not only future careers in engineering butalso life-long learning. The nature and culture of
. By 1905, in addition to mining, electrical, civil, and mechanicalengineering, courses in chemical engineering were added to the establishedSchool of Mines. In 1917 the name was changed to the School of Mines andEngineering. In 1946, the two schools were separated and the School ofEngineering was formed with four departments: Civil, Chemical, Electrical, andMechanical. In the mid-1960’s Bioengineering, Materials Science andEngineering, and Computer Science were added. The programs in Civil,Chemical, Electrical, Mechanical and Computer Engineering and MaterialScience and Engineering all hold ABET accredited programs. The Undergraduateprogram in Biomedical Engineering is a relatively new program which will moveforward with accreditation within
association with the existing 4+1 program,coupling the BS degree to a MS Engineering Degree with a specialization in BiomedicalEngineering.There are academic programs in Bioengineering and Biomedical Engineering at more than 80universities in the United States alone and many of these have undergraduate as well as graduateprograms. The vast majority of these programs are centered on the production of Ph.D.’s, M.D.’sand the generation of avant garde research. The need for a Biomedical Engineering programfocused on providing bachelors and applied masters graduates to the growing biomedicalengineering industry is acute. In addition, the need for a program focused on accomplishing theapplied research required to transform laboratory procedure into
ourdesire for the ePortfolio to aid in program assessment we must likewise develop guidelines,procedures and evaluation rubrics. Presently a team of engineering faculty is working with theassessment coordinator for the University to address these issues. And already, the possibility ofproviding an ePortfolio for each of the 1500 entering freshman engineering students at VirginiaTech fall 2004 is being broached.Bibliography1. Paulson, L., Paulson, P, and Meyer, C, “What Makes a Portfolio a Portfolio?”, Educational Leadership, February 1991, pp. 60-63.2. Cambridge, B. L., Kahn, S., Tompkins, D. P., and Yancey, K. B. (Eds.). Electronic portfolios: Emerging practices in student, faculty, and institutional learning, Washington, DC: American
Key Ingredients of Modern Electrical and Computer Engineering Undergraduate Programs M. R. Parker and M. S. Alam Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of South Alabama Mobile, AL 36688, USA1 (Session number: 1532) AbstractIn this paper, we discuss the evolution of modern North American Electrical and ComputerEngineering curricula designed to, among other things, satisfy guidelines consistent with ABETaccreditation as well as those required by the increasingly common constraints of StateArticulation. In the process of curriculum development, it is
better educators. It gives us a deeper understanding about howstudents learn our subject matter best, which in turn better prepares them to enter their chosenfields. Page 9.855.10 Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition. Copyright 2004, American Society for Engineering EducationBibliography1. Bigge, M. L. & Shermis, S. S. (1999). Learning theories for teachers (6th ed.). New York: Longman.2. Gredler, M. E. (2001). Learning and instruction: Theory into practice (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice-Hall.3. Ref. 1, p. 3.4. Branoff, T. J
in Education Conference, IEEE/ASEE, Reno, NV, October (2001).18. Van Duzer, E. and F. McMartin, “Methods to improve the validity and sensitivity of a self/peer assessment instrument,” IEEE Trans. Ed., 43(2), 153-158, May (2000).19. Version 1, received from Pat Meade at Frontiers in Education Conference, Reno, NV, October (2001)20. Seat, E., and T.P. McAnear, “Administering, scoring and debriefing Team Developer,” Proc. Frontiers in Education Conference, IEEE/ASEE, Reno, NV, October (2001).21. Crocker, L., and J. Algina, Introduction to classical and modern test theory, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc., Chicago, p. 143, 157ff, (1986).22. McCaulley, M. H., Godleski, E. S., Yokomoto, C. F., Harrisberger, L