adjustments toan already over-burdened curriculum, in an attempt to meet a broad set of demands,have not been effective in meeting objectives, and have convinced manystakeholders that the time has come for a radical departure from the traditionallayered and sequential structure that has prevailed for decades. There are clearlysignificant challenges ahead. Decision makers should not lose site of the fact thatstudents and their learning should be the focus of the educational process. i.e., toreframe the roles of faculty and rethink the current “mental model” of teaching andlearning.Relevant Cognitive Processes for Faculty DevelopmentThe primary focus in this article is on the development of young engineering facultymembers in the Arab Gulf Region and
course of the academic term and included hands-on,interactive experiences that such as determining the forces on a longboard or building a footbridge in Yosemite National Park. (For more information on the lab experiences, see Scharet al. 21) All instructors were veteran teachers and the curriculum did not contain unusual eventsto promote closeness among students. Data were gathered using Qualtrics, an on-line surveyinstrument, with a pre-course survey during the first week of class and a post-course surveyconducted during the last week of class, before the final exam and grades. Site-specific IRBapproval was obtained for each location.Data from all locations were collected and combined with final grades, using a coded version ofthe student name
improve undergraduate engineering education. Prior to his academic career, Dr. Connolly worked as a systems integration engineer on the Space Station and Space Shuttle programs at the NASA Johnson Space Center, and as a reliability engineer on the B-2 Stealth Bomber program for the Depart- ment of Defense. Dr. Connolly earned a B.E. in Mechanical Engineering from the State University of New York at Stony Brook, an M.S.E. in Aerospace Engineering, and Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering, both from UT Austin. He served as a graduate teaching assistant for six years during his graduate studies. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Graduate Teaching Assistant Certification as a
class engineers for the Americas. He is actively involved in the International Division of the American Society for Engineering Education and in the Latin American and Caribbean Consortium of Engineering Institution (LACCEI) as Vice-President for Finance.Dr. Uladzislau Ivashyn, Pennsylvania State University Uladzislau Ivashyn is an Instructor in Engineering at Pennsylvania State University. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016Developing a learning module to enhance motivation and self-efficacy ofstudents participating in multinational design projectsThe rapid developments in communications along with the global integration of resources aroundthe world are making the creation of global
(ii) Special Material Expert Curriculum development for National Resource Center-CAM composite ma- terials course for National Resource Center at Edmonds Community College.Dr. Eugene Judson, Arizona State University Eugene Judson is an Associate Professor of for the Mary Lou Fulton Teachers College at Arizona State University. His past experiences include having been a middle school science teacher, Director of Aca- demic and Instructional Support for the Arizona Department of Education, a research scientist for the Center for Research on Education in Science, Mathematics, Engineering and Technology (CRESMET), and an evaluator for several NSF projects. His first research strand concentrates on the relationship be
design solutions. Raul continues to work with the college to develop training curriculums for their IDEA Lab while pursuing his undergraduate studies. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 A Novel Approach to Skeleton-Note Instruction in Large Engineering Courses: Unified and Concise Handouts that are Fun and ColorfulSkeleton notes (partially completed hand-outs that are completed during class by the instructorand the students) can be an effective pedagogy for delivering engineering material to largesections when factors such as a high student-instructor ratio and/or inadequate TeachingAssistant support prohibits a fully flipped model. This paper
is senior research scientist at the Center for Innovation through Visualization and Simula- tion at Purdue University Northwest. He has MS in Technology, BS in Computer Graphics Technology, and is currently pursuing a PhD in Technology focusing on the application of mixed reality technologies to education.Mr. Jichao Wang, CIVS, Purdue University Calumetzitao xiong, tappolloDr. Rameh Teegavarapu, Florida Atlantic University Dr. Ramesh Teegavarapu (Dr. T.) is currently an associate professor in the Department of Civil, Environ- mental and Geomatics department at Florida Atlantic University (FAU), Boca Raton, Florida and founder and leader of the Hydrosystems Research Laboratory (HRL) in the department. He has over 15
Education at Arizona State University, and Director of the Division of Curriculum and Instruction. He received his Ph.D. in Educational Psychology from the University of Wisconsin-Madison in 1992, where he also served in the National Center for Research on Mathematical Sciences Education as a postdoctoral scholar.Prof. Stephen J. Krause, Arizona State University Stephen Krause is professor in the Materials Science Program in the Fulton School of Engineering at Arizona State University. He teaches in the areas of introductory materials engineering, polymers and composites, and capstone design. His research interests include evaluating conceptual knowledge, mis- conceptions and technologies to promote conceptual change. He
Paper ID #14856Evaluating Study Abroad Programs: A Follow-Up Effort to Determine Com-parative Value and Importance in Engineering and Non-Engineering Pro-gramsHolt Zaugg PhD, Brigham Young University Holt Zaugg is the Assessment Librarian at the Harold B. Lee Library at Brigham Young University. His research interests focus on assessments and evaluations that improve student learning and integrate library services with other faculty courses.Dr. Gregg Morris Warnick, Brigham Young University Gregg M. Warnick is the Director of the Weidman Center for Global Leadership and Associate Teaching Professor of Engineering
finalnote, students in both sections of Math 45 had access to the videos; only students in the invertedsection of Engineering 82 were allowed access to the videos.In the final year of the study, Engineering 82 was taught using the Team-Based Learning(Michaelsen et al.) and was entirely inverted (both sections). Math 45 will be taught in Spring2016 using a combination of flipped sessions and traditional sessions (new materials deliveredduring class meeting time).MeasuresStudents in both sections of each course were administered a pretest and posttest attitude survey.The pretest survey contained a total of 28 selected items from established instruments includingfrom the Research on the Integrated Science Curriculum (RISC), Motivated Strategies
to integrate the project at appropriate times in their already-busycurriculum. Therefore, the teacher suggested that the project could be more easily integrated as acapstone project in an AP Physics class once they complete their AP Physics exam, typically inMay. A final pilot at in three AP Physics courses, two of which are at a different school district,are being implemented during spring 2016.As these improvements are being made, the UC San Diego team is making preparations to trainadditional volunteers and expand the curriculum into more San Diego schools. The team iscurrently recruiting university students and local professional engineers from EERI student andprofessional chapters to broaden the number of available instructors and
their knowledge and using a rubric or grading system toevaluate the students’ knowledge. Students can be asked to develop a concept map with paperand pencil or by using specialized software, and scoring can be holistic, relational, structural, orby methods specific to a particular application6. Stoddart et al.7 provide an overview of the useof concept maps to assess student learning in science, and Carey8 was one of the first researchersto compare concept maps produced by students over time as a means to understand howstudents’ knowledge develops.In engineering education, concept maps have been used to assess knowledge integration acrossan engineering program9, conceptual understanding in a engineering dynamics course10, andstudent
broad sense of professional responsibility… and engineering ethics is not usually taughtwith this kind of scope.” 13 p. 330Case study: Professional Issues CourseThe ASCE Body of Knowledge (BOK) presents aspirational vision for the education of civilengineering students.4 It articulates 24 outcomes and levels of achievement for each, detailingwhich should be achieved as part of an accredited civil engineering Bachelor’s degree. The civilengineering curriculum at the University of Colorado Boulder (CU) was lacking in some of theseBOK areas, such as sustainability and historical issues. Further, some members of the curriculumcommittee felt that robust direct assessment evidence of students’ knowledge of current eventsand contemporary issues (ABET
of a “reduce, reuse and recycle”philosophy in construction and constructed facilities are clear imperatives. Our contention is thatconstruction management students must be fully cognizant of these imperatives. However ethicseducation for most construction management students currently lacks global and sustainabilitycomponents, and, further, curricula only require “micro-inserts” of ethics teaching without anysystematic or standalone course for professional education. This is contrast to engineeringprograms, such as civil, environmental, and computer engineering. This paper discusses thenature of the construction industry, globalized trends, sustainable development and confirms thenecessity for integrating ethics education into the curriculum
Laborary in Pasadena, CA. He has a B.S. in Physics from Seattle Pacfic University and an MSEE from the University of Washington. Don is an IEEE senior member and member of the ASEE. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 A Survey of the State of the Power Engineering Profession in the Pacific Northwest and What Working Professionals are Defining as Priorities for Preparing Students to Fill Present and Near- Future VacanciesAbstractWhat is the state of the power engineering profession today and what advice can workingprofessionals give to academia on what is important for an introductory course? These twofundamental questions were asked of 73
. This resulted in several publications in this educational research areas. Dr. Al-Hammoud won the ”Ameet and Meena Chakma award for exceptional teaching by a student” in 2014 from University of Waterloo. Her students regard her as an innovative teacher who introduced new ideas to the classroom. Such ideas include using ”props” to increase students’ understanding of the materials, as well as using new technology such as i-clickers and IF-AT cards. Dr. Al-Hammoud also organized a bridge-building contest in one of her courses where she worked with other professors in the department to integrate the project horizontally across the curriculum. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016
Paper ID #16895Developing a Questionnaire and Evaluation Methods for a High School RocketProgramMr. Ibrahim Halil Yeter, Texas Tech University Ibrahim H. Yeter is currently a PhD candidate in the Curriculum and Instruction program at the College of Education, and at the same time, he is pursuing his Master’s degree in Petroleum Engineering at Texas Tech University. He is highly interested in conducting research within the Engineering Education frame- work. Mr. Yeter plans to graduate in December 2016 with both degrees and is looking forward to securing a teaching position within a research university and continuing his
curriculum for their STEM program, he also has 14 years’ experience in the Civil Engineering Industry. John Ross has a BS in Civil Engineering, and a MA in Agriculture and Extension Education with an emphasis in technology, both from New Mexico State University.Ms. Elizabeth Ann Howard, New Mexico State University Elizabeth Howard serves as the Program Manager for the College of Engineering at New Mexico State University. Elizabeth is currently serving as the program coordinator for the Freshman Year Experience program at NMSU which includes hiring and managing the college mentors, and overall coordination of the program. Elizabeth has worked in the College of Engineering for the past 4 years in student affairs.Dr. Rolfe
toretain information learned from interventions. Tafur, Douglas, Diefes-Dux[6] observed studentsfor third and fourth grade students for two years and found that they were able to earn thehighest test scores and demonstrate retention of the engineering knowledge learned in previousyears. Furthermore, some second grade students who were exposed to engineering curriculum,matriculated to third grades classes that did not include engineering curriculum. When tested,these students demonstrated an increase in engineering knowledge. This was evidence that theyretained the information taught to them in the second grade.Douglas, Wiles, Yoon & Deifes-Dux[7] performed a case study on one school in the data set andinterviewed four teachers about their
Nandikolla, California State University - Northridge Dr. Nandikolla has backgrounds in Mechanical, Electrical and Control Engineering and has developed courses in electro-mechanical areas to improve engineering curriculum. She has experience developing and teaching engineering core courses with hands-on experimentation and industry collaboration within classroom encouraging creativity and teamwork.Dr. George Youssef, San Diego State University Dr. George Youssef received his Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from University of California Los An- geles in 2010 and joined the faculty at San Diego State University after four years appointment at Califor- nia State University Northridge. His research interest is in the general
computer engineering at Rowan University. I am very interested in wearable devices, sensors, app development, and writing code to integrate software and hardware. In terms of ASEE, I had the unique experience of helping develop the platform that would be presented to freshmen engineers, in order to see how a complete drastic change in homework would affect student’s motivation and desire to complete the work.Dr. Cheryl A. Bodnar, Rowan University Cheryl A. Bodnar, Ph.D., CTDP is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Chemical Engineering at Rowan University. Dr. Bodnar’s research interests relate to the incorporation of active learning techniques in undergraduate classes as well as integration of innovation and
students demonstrated ability to master the skills ofthe NGSS best practices. Data collected is in the form of qualitative observations from theteacher-engineer pair, student team reflection. Students were able to ask a question, conduct andexperiment, and communicate the results in a clear and easy to understand format to an authenticaudience. They also learned gastronomy skills, like using a knife, figuring out how to pipette,and the artistic plating of a finished dish. Molecular gastronomy was used to increase student content knowledge and skillsassociated with macromolecules throughout a 10-week unit on food science that related to the9th grade biology and chemistry curriculum. All students demonstrated mastery of theengineering design
a50/50 mixed program, offered at New Jersey Institute of Technology’s Center for Pre-CollegePrograms during the summer of 2015 were effective in increasing all of the students’ contentknowledge in Engineering, Communications, Computer Applications and Mathematics.Although the programs followed the same curriculum and were taught by the same team ofinstructors, some differential effects were seen for students in the single-gender programs asopposed to the mixed-gender program.The female students in the single-gender program showed greater improvements in engineeringcontent knowledge and computer applications than the female students in the mixed-genderprogram. These results, in addition to significant increases in self-efficacy and an increase
friendships and study groups within their Peer Adviser cohort. This is an important step in students integrating into the McCormick community. Students forming friendships and student group is a major goal of the change in advising. Forming student cohorts around a major, with a Peer Adviser has been very helpful for some students. Having a network of friends is important in helping students normalize their experiences. This is also helpful in forming study groups. Students know each other, and have people they can study with before major exams. Peer Advisers are helping uncover problems early. The Peer advisers are helping students normalize their experiences especially the stress students feel during their first round of Midterm exams. To hear an
- ment at Drexel University. His research interests include Physical Design, High Performance Computing and developing and improving tools in Engineering Education. From September 2014 to March 2015, he was an intern at NVIDIA Corporation at Santa Clara, CA.Prof. Nagarajan Kandasamy, Drexel University Naga Kandasamy is an Associate Professor in the Electrical and Computer Engineering Department at Drexel University where he teaches and conducts research in the area of computer engineering, with specific interests in embedded systems, self-managing systems, reliable and fault-tolerant computing, distributed systems, computer architecture, and testing and verification of digital systems. He received his Ph.D in 2003
appropriate experimentation, analyze and interpret data, and use engineering judgment to draw conclusions. 4. An ability to communicate effectively with a range of audiences. 5. An ability to recognize ethical and professional responsibilities in engineering situations and make informed judgments, which must consider the impact of engineering solutions in global, economic, environmental, and societal contexts. 6. An ability to recognize the ongoing need for additional knowledge and locate, evaluate, integrate, and apply this knowledge appropriately. 7. An ability to function effectively on teams that establish goals, plan tasks, meet deadlines, and analyze risk and uncertainty
students and professors. However, to integrate ethicsmodules more thoroughly across the engineering curriculum a systematic approach is requiredwith proper accounting of teaching load for ethics/philosophy faculty who lecture in multiplecourses. For efficiency, an ethics case-study database with assignment and discussion questionsshould be maintained, and an online module could be explored with in-class facilitateddiscussion.Introduction With the rapid advancement of technology and integration within all aspects of our society,the ethical implications of our engineering decisions are growing in importance. Engineeringprofessionals have a duty to design and manufacture products that are used to improve the livesof others. In the workplace
the grant were able to interact with over 60 secondary educators throughoutIndiana to better understand current gaps in curriculum, professional development and issuesexperienced in the classroom with current logistics and manufacturing curriculum. Theresearchers recorded the educators’ concerns and integrated these gaps and challenges forsubsequent training opportunities and supplemental curriculum components.Two major obstacles were identified through these interviews. The first was an issue ofsecondary educators having little knowledge or experience with current technological trends insupply chain management and logistics. The second concern was that many students who hadtaken previously-developed courses in logistics or manufacturing
required first-year engineering curriculum atNortheastern University. It will outline the motivation to redesign the curriculum, and includereview of engineering education practice that inspired and directed the change, along withevidence and assessment of the effectiveness of the new approach. In 2012, after acomprehensive curriculum review by a faculty committee at Northeastern University, the first-year engineering program decided to adopt the “cornerstone to capstone” curriculum design.The overarching goal of the cornerstone was the integration of design, programming, graphicalcommunication, and engineering analysis through real world, hands-on design projectspreviously taught in two separate courses. This goal directly supports the
).1 In addition, for the purpose of shortening the route to real engineering world in front ofgraduates, it is clearly beneficial to further facilitate students making flexible use of engineeringknowledge they have assimilated in the classes and to strengthen the link between academictheorems and practical hands-on applications. Following this trend, a curricular and pedagogicalmodel for teaching multidisciplinary design to senior undergraduate students was presented.2 Asa result, a project-oriented capstone course at junior or senior year of undergraduate programshas been strongly required to balance the theory and practice in engineering education.3 Besides,an approach for engineering curriculum integration in capstone design courses to