parts of engineering practice. In describing the foundation of the practice, Koen [19,p. 10] defines the engineering method as, “the strategy for causing the best change in a poorlyunderstood or uncertain situation within the available resources.” One could succinctly use thewords optimization or innovation in place of the Koen definition. Furthermore, change thecontext or application and this portrayal of the engineering method is equally meaningful to thepractice of leadership! In a nutshell, we have identified solid and robust common groundbetween engineering and leadership. To follow this theme in more detail, let us consider the Lucas and Hanson [20] list of sixelements that they call engineering habits of mind. In other words, the
Oklahoma State University regents distinguished research, Halliburton outstanding college of engineering faculty, and Fulbright-Tocqueville distinguished chair awards. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Assessing Impact of an REU program on Student’s Intellectual Growth and Interest in Graduate School in Cybermanufacturing Pavan K. Moturu, Bimal Nepal, Prabhakar Pagilla, Satish Bukkapatnam Texas A&M University, College Station, TX.AbstractAdvancements in information technology and computational intelligence have transformed themanufacturing landscape, allowing firms to produce highly complex and customized product in arelatively short amount of time
aRealistic, Open-ended Task. Studies in Engineering Education.Cross, N., & Clayburn Cross, A. (1995). Observations of teamwork and social processes in design.Analysing Design Activity, 16(2), 143–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-694X(94)00007-ZCunningham, C. M., & Kelly, G. J. (2017). Epistemic Practices of Engineering for Education. ScienceEducation, 101(3), 486–505. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21271de Jong, T., Linn, M. C., & Zacharia, Z. C. (2013). Physical and Virtual Laboratories in Science andEngineering Education. Science, 340(6130), 305–308. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1230579Duschl, R. (2008). Science Education in Three-Part Harmony: Balancing Conceptual, Epistemic, andSocial Learning Goals. Review of Research in Education
on gears and powerscrews this past year required teams to design, select, and size gears and a power screw for anindustrial compaction device; teams were given the specifications and approximate placement ofa motor relative to a compaction chamber, and were asked to design a power transmission systemso as to maximize the compaction speed relative to lifetime cost (including cost of components,maintenance, and power). In these exercises, students prepare a detailed report outlining theirsolution that is graded by the instructor or graduate student teaching assistants. For the in-classactivities, teams also prepare a one-page summary of their design for review and assessment bytheir peers. The act of distilling the large report into a clear
NSF RET program,two software tools were employed: eQUEST (www.doe2.com/equest/), a building energysimulation program to simulate the amount of energy used by a designated structure, and AthenaImpact Estimator for Buildings (ATHENA, www.athenasmi.org/our-software-data/impact-estimator/), which assesses the life cycle of a building based on its materials and assemblies.Domain expertise in building design for calibrating the software tools was provided by Mr.Anthony Robinson, President of Axis Design-Build, Inc. DACE [2-3] was introduced to efficiently leverage the availability of computersimulation models. For novice researchers that are brand new to research, the DACE approachprovides a general research training framework because the
(2015).3. Dym, C. L., Agogino, A. M., Eris, O., Frey, D. D. & Leifer, L. J. Engineering Design Thinking, Teaching, and Learning. J. Eng. Educ. 94, 103–120 (2005).4. Dorst, K. & Dijkhuis, J. Comparing paradigms for describing design activity. Des. Stud. 16, 261–274 (1995).5. Schon, D. A. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. (Basic Books, 1983).6. Bell, B. J., Gass, M. A., Nafziger, C. S. & Starbuck, J. D. The State of Knowledge of Outdoor Orientation Programs: Current Practices, Research, and Theory. J. Exp. Educ. 37, 31–45 (2014).7. Sibthorp, J., Furman, N., Paisley, K. & Gookin, J. Long-term Impacts Attributed to Participation in Adventure Education
energy. In the private sector, he developed an extensive experience training junior engineers just coming out of college. More recently, he has been involved in supervising graduate students and coordinating group based senior projects.Dr. Andrew Davol, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis ObispoMiss Huy Anh Duong, Mechanical Engineering Department Cal PolyTrent Hamilton c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Development of a Multidisciplinary Renewable Energy Laboratory for Research and Education Dr. Jacques J. Belanger, Dr. Andrew Davol, Huy Duong, Trent Hamilton California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo
questions regarding its impact. Several studies have comparedoutcomes between face-to-face and online college student outcomes [3]. Summer STEM campsare designed for different age groups, have a short duration, and are designed with specific © American Society for Engineering Education, 2021 2021 ASEE Illinois-Indiana Section Conference Proceedings | Paper ID 35153learning objectives. Their overall purpose is to inform, motivate, and recruit students to STEMfields rather than to build expertise. There is a shortage of comprehensive studies regarding theirimpact and there is not much shared information about virtual camps, which were necessitateddue to unusual social circumstances.In this paper, we summarize a reformatted water
. Investigate Strategies to minimize Negative impacts of soiling on PV Panel efficiency (S. Randall)Conduct a research study to investigate strategies to minimize the negative impacts of soiling onphotovoltaic (PV) panel efficiency and reduce the cost-per-kilowatt hour of electricity producedwithin the context of Minnesota’s mid-latitude, mid-continental climate.Round 2 Grants:6. Axial Flux Generator Improvement (V. Winstead)Develop a viable enhanced axial flux generator design with integrated ultracapacitor storage andVirtual Synchronous Generator (VSG) characteristic. Test and validate the design to ensurerobust operability and demonstrate the enhanced capability for improved grid interoperability.Design and construct prototype axial flux
student development of these skills.While freshmen-level bioengineering courses include scientific, biological, chemical, physical,mathematical, and engineering principles, students struggle to understand how these conceptsintegrate as a whole in the field of bioengineering, in part due to the broad nature of the field(ranging from medical to environmental applications). With time, greater appreciation for thefield occurs well into their senior years (i.e., capstone design) but may limit the amount of timethat students can nurture these specialized skills before graduation. Therefore, by offering moreopportunities to foster research-related skills (hypothesis formulation, dataanalysis/interpretation, oral communication) early in their education
, staff and students are valued for their unique cultures, experiences and perspectives. The EOD identifies high qualified undergraduate students and assists in their preparation for graduate research and education by building a diverse workforce and student body and by developing equitable academic supports designed to meet the academic needs of the student body without discrimination. Dr. Wosu has developed and directed mentoring programs for preparing women and underrepresented college students for graduate education, and high school students for college careers. Since coming to the University of Pittsburgh, he has created several programs including the Pitt Engineering Career Access Program (PECAP), a program to
person in charge of her/his life-long plan. The series intended to answer thequestion, “How do I get the best possible results for my life goals from this graduate program?”With faculty and industry engagement, we identified specific learning outcomes for theleadership series, critical features for the process and expected outcomes for each of the courses.We used a set of critical design assumptions as our guide for development. These assumptionswere based on adult learning theory as well as motivational theory. Furthermore, we felt thestudent should take personal responsibility to be actively involved in their learning agenda, shapea vision for his/her leadership and learning that would guide their planning process while theydeliberately
: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ.Caldwell, J. E. (2007). Clickers in the large classroom: Current research and best-practice tips. Life Sciences Education, 6(1), 9–20.Chen, H. L., Lattuca, L. R., Hamilton, E. R. (2008). Conceptualizing Engagement: Contribution of Faculty to Student Engagement in Engineering. Journal of Engineering Education, 3, 339-353.Chi, M. T. H. (2009). Active-Constructive-Interactive: A conceptual framework for differentiating learning activities. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1, 73-105.Corno, L., & Mandinach, E. B. (2004). What have we learned about engagement in the last twenty years? A Volume in: Research on Sociocultural
risks. A third case studywill show how research on electrical and electronic waste (e-waste) recycling has been translatedto teach students about engineering and community development and to empower communitiesto recycle e-waste in safer and more profitable conditions. A fourth case study will show howresearch on construction and demolition waste (C&DW) has been translated to teach freshmenengineering students about design for community and to empower communities near C&DWsites how to recycle these materials to diversify their incomes. The paper concludes withrecommendations for how to begin making RT a more central feature of graduate engineeringresearch.IntroductionThis paper has three purposes. First, we want to identify best
community and promoting change at CAEE partner and affiliate schools. Honorariums for faculty and fellowships for graduate students are provided. THE SUMMER SUMMIT: This is an intensive, interactive, face-to-face learning experience to launch the Institute year. Scholars 1) learn about research design and methods from the learning sciences as well as the complexities of learning within a domain; 2) have opportunities to practice research methods; 3) develop as a community; 4) discuss current issues in engineering teaching and learning; and 5) formulate a research study to be conducted during the academic year. Where appropriate, Summit activities draw on research findings from CAEE investigators, such as findings from the
environmental ethics and bioethics, focusing on questions of ethics, science, and representation. He teaches a wide variety of undergraduate and graduate courses on related topics.Dr. Andrew O. Brightman, Purdue University, West Lafayette Andrew O. Brightman is an Associate Professor of Engineering Practice in the Weldon School of Biomed- ical Engineering at Purdue University where he serves as Assistant Head for Academic Affairs. His re- search background is in cellular biochemistry, tissue engineering, and engineering ethics. He and his multidisciplinary team are committed to developing effective pedagogy and tools for enhancing ethical reasoning skills for innovative engineering design and socially responsible engineering
Paper ID #37522Understanding the Impact of an LSAMP Scholar ProgramDr. Yang Lydia Yang, Kansas State University Yang Lydia Yang is an Associate Professor of Quantitative Research Methodology at College of Educa- tion, Kansas State University. She received her Ph.D. in Curriculum & Instruction from Florida Inter- national University. Her research interest include quantitative educational research design and statistical analyses, Q methodology, and recruitment and retention in STEM fields.Dr. Brenee King, Kansas State UniversityDr. Amy Rachel Betz, Kansas State University Dr. Amy Betz is the Assistant Dean for Retention
United States15 recognised theapplicability of Roberts’s recommendations, urging US graduate schools to “make every effort todevelop these opportunities for their doctoral students16” (p.44).”Instead of the typical research-focused dissertations such programs will conceptualize, researchand plan for implementation of a field/practice based research and /or development project in anyof the arenas of today's complex technology-based enterprises. Typically professional doctorateswill advance a state of a technology or practice from one Technology Readiness Level to thenext higher level. In essence they will engage in use-inspired research17.3 Forces evidencing the needAs suggested by this paper’s Figure 1 in the introduction, there are multiple
Disagree, 4 – Agree, and5 – Strongly Agree. The results shown in Fig. 9 include all the collected surveys (total = 114)from five different years combined. 1. This project enabled me to apply my knowledge of math and solid mechanics to a real-world eng. problem. 2. This project improved my understanding of related topics taught in this course. 3. This project enhanced my ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools (such as a computer-based analysis program) necessary for engineering practice. 4. This project improved my understanding of sheet-metal fabrication, and gave me a better appreciation of the impact of manufacturing on product design as well as dimensional variability in fabricated parts. 5. This project
withthree components: 1) hands-on training seminars, 2) communication challenges putting thetraining into practice on video and for audiences reflective of the professions discussed in theprogram, and 3) mentorship by a non-program institutional STEM alumnus/a. This paper will present the program design and research results from the first year. Usinga mixed methods approach, we sought to examine the extent to which graduate students’perceptions of communication confidence and awareness of STEM career opportunitiesimproved over the course of the program. We also aimed to measure their communication skillsto different audiences and obtain feedback on the most impactful program components. Dataincluded pre/post-surveys, focus groups, and
Powered by www.slayte.com The STEM Center to Promote Undergraduate Education and Research at Sam Houston State UniversityAbstractThe STEM Center at Sam Houston State University (SHSU) has received funding from theNational Science Foundation (NSF - IUSE) and was established in 2017. The STEM Center seeksto increase the number and quality of STEM graduates by establishing a strong foundation forlearning using innovative teaching practices, supporting students in finding research and internshipopportunities, and building lifelong skills needed for advancement and leadership in STEMcareers. The center is in one of the STEM buildings with two fully equipped classrooms and officespace for full-time staff members. The center
Engineering, Dr. Barrella holds a Master of City and Regional Planning (Transportation) from Georgia Institute of Technology and a B.S. in Civil Engineering from Bucknell University. Dr. Barrella has investi- gated best practices in engineering education since 2003 (at Bucknell University) and began collaborating on sustainable engineering design research while at Georgia Tech. Prior to joining the WFU faculty, she led the junior capstone design sequence at James Madison University, was the inaugural director of the NAE Grand Challenges Program at JMU, and developed first-year coursework and interdisciplinary electives. American c Society for Engineering
representsuch a large (and positive) shift from all prior work that a follow-on study was conducted toexplore the reasons for the change. The follow-on study is the focus of this paper.The specific research question addressed in this paper is: Why did the interventions improvelearning of the role of problem formulation in design?Literature Review“Doing design does not insure the learning of design” [7]. A foundational element of nearlyall engineering design courses is doing design. Implicit in this pedagogy is the assumption thatdoing design is critical, if perhaps even sufficient, for learning design. Studies, however, showthat “doing” is clearly not sufficient for learning to occur.While design does not have one definition, the importance of
performthe design and assembly of the conversion package. c) CenterPoint Energy needed to have theconversion done by a company that met the automobile manufacturers and federal requirementsfor certification of the vehicle for commercial use. Thus, the student projects would than beassociated with testing the vehicle, acquiring performance data, and the problems and possiblesolutions to the widespread implementation of plug-in hybrid vehicles.The objective of the projects, to be performed as elective special problem courses, would be forthe students to develop practical research and data analysis skills and apply them to PHEVs. Theelectrical power faculty, of which there are two, started working on a proposal to CenterPointEnergy, and two students
Paper ID #29057The Design and Impact of a Combined Makerspace, Wet Lab, andInstructional Design Studio for Chemical Engineering CurriculumProf. Anthony Butterfield, University of Utah Anthony Butterfield is an Associate Professor (Lecturer) in the Chemical Engineering Department of the University of Utah. He received his B. S. and Ph. D. from the University of Utah and a M. S. from the University of California, San Diego. His teaching responsibilities include the senior unit operations laboratory, capstone laboratory, first year design laboratory, and the introduction to chemical engineering. His research interests focus
University of Applied Sciences, HS-Ulm in Ulm Germany working with their design programs and finalizing a dual degree graduate program between UAS and Rose-Hulman. His current research interests include engi- neering design methodologies, student learning styles, active/cooperative education and the integration of entrepreneurial concepts and practices throughout the curriculum. He was the 2001 – 2003 chair of the Educational Research Methods (ERM) division of ASEE, is a senior member of IEEE, and an ABET program evaluator. He was FIE program co-chair for FIE 98, 01, and 04 and served two terms on the FIE steering committee. He is an associate editor of the on-line Journal of Advances in Engineering Education (AEE
for ASEE in 2014 and ”Elementary Teachers’ Reported Responses to Student Design Failures”, which was awarded best paper for the K-12 and Precol- lege Division in 2015. Liz is a frequent invited keynote speaker both nationally and internationally. Prior c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Paper ID #15016to joining NCSU, Liz worked in engineering and management positions at IBM Corporation for ten yearsand co-owned an informal science education business. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Elementary Teachers’ Reflections on Design Failures and Use of
educators are able toinfluence what their students are reflecting on and the metacognitive strategies they use to do so,students will be better equipped to attain the knowledge and skills needed to successfully applysuch skills in engineering work contexts.The purpose of this qualitative study was to examine the impact of differently worded weeklyreflection prompts on the dimension and level of thinking first-year engineering studentsengaged in when reflecting on their feedback or performance in a course. This study also beginsto address the larger need for more emphasis on learning strategies development in engineeringcourses. More specifically, this study addresses the gap in research on the influence of reflectionprompts on students’ thinking
vary based on a respondent’s gender?Analysis of the research data generated by the survey is designed to contribute to a collectiveunderstanding of emerging themes regarding perceptions that pertain to female challenges andopportunities within the industry. Furthermore, the research is designed to identify areas ofdisparity between male and female observations and provide recommendations for areas offuture research.2. Literature ReviewDespite strides in gender equality gender division within occupational choices still stronglyexists where women are underrepresented in male-dominated fields and men underrepresented infemale-dominated fields [11]. A recent study in Japan shows that female-to-male ratios ofemployees correlate to gender
AC 2007-1679: CURRICULAR MIDDLE MANAGEMENT: THE ROLE OF AGRADUATE STUDENT INSTRUCTOR IN A SENIOR-LEVEL DESIGN COURSEJeffrey Ringenberg, University of Michigan Jeffrey Ringenberg is a lecturer and a former graduate student instructor in the Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science at the University of Michigan. His research interests include methods for bringing technology into the classroom and studying the effects of social networking on learning.Elliot Soloway, University of Michigan Elliot Soloway is a professor in the School of Information, the School of Education, and the Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science at the University of Michigan. He