. Richards, “Curriculum Approaches in Language Teaching: Forward, Central, and Backward Design,” RELC J., vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 5–33, Apr. 2013, doi: 10.1177/0033688212473293.[10] J. Emory, “Understanding Backward Design to Strengthen Curricular Models,” Nurse Educ., vol. 39, no. 3, p. 122, Jun. 2014, doi: 10.1097/NNE.0000000000000034.[11] K. Y. Neiles and K. Arnett, “Backward Design of Chemistry Laboratories: A Primer,” J. Chem. Educ., vol. 98, no. 9, pp. 2829–2839, Sep. 2021, doi: 10.1021/acs.jchemed.1c00443.[12] K. M. Cooper, P. A. G. Soneral, and S. E. Brownell, “Define Your Goals Before You Design a CURE: A Call to Use Backward Design in Planning Course-Based Undergraduate Research Experiences,” J. Microbiol
representations and physical materials; the second is activities & interactions, whichemphasizes engineering usually benefits from project-based and collaboratively team-organized work; andthe last dimension named participation & identity, which indicates that engineers often have a strong senseof engineering identity in communities of practice [18]. Community of practice is an important part insituated learning theory, which refers to the informal learning organizations or learning contexts composedof learners with similar professional experience and shared enthusiasms, like students leagues, engineeringclubs, professional laboratories, competition teams, etc. [19]. The current research is a part of a largerproject concentrating on the effect of
, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign Alex Pagano is a PhD student studying engineering design. His work is focused on the early phases of design and the use of human-centered design or design thinking as a teaching tool. Alex holds a BS in Materials Science and Engineering from University ofMr. Saadeddine Shehab, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign I am currently the Associate Director of Assessment and Research team at the Siebel Center for Design (SCD) at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. I work with a group of wonderful and talented people at SCD’s Assessment and Research Laboratory to conduct research that informs and evaluates our practice of teaching and learning human-centered design
disciplines. The College ofEngineering and Computer Science (ECS) amended the ECS bylaws in 2020 to specify thatpromotion from Assistant to Associate teaching faculty must have demonstrated both “very high-quality teaching” and secondarily “high quality service,” and for Associate to Full, demonstrationof “excellence” in teaching and “very high quality service” in addition to leadership whereopportunities exist. The bylaws note that teaching may encompass various professionalactivities relating to undergraduate or graduate education, including classroom effectiveness,lecture and laboratory course development, and adoption of more effective teaching practices,whereas service includes program administration, committee participation, student and
Meeting, New York, NY: American Educational Research Association, 2018. Accessed: Apr. 09, 2023. [Online]. Available: http://tinyurl.com/y9rlaaxa[35] M. A. Maher, A. M. Wofford, J. Roksa, and D. F. Feldon, “Finding a Fit: Biological Science Doctoral Students’ Selection of a Principal Investigator and Research Laboratory,” LSE, vol. 19, no. 3, p. ar31, Sep. 2020, doi: 10.1187/cbe.19-05-0105.[36] B. A. Burt, “Toward a Theory of Engineering Professorial Intentions: The Role of Research Group Experiences,” American Educational Research Journal, vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 289–332, Apr. 2019, doi: 10.3102/0002831218791467.[37] E. Crede and M. Borrego, “Learning in Graduate Engineering Research Groups of Various Sizes
Paper ID #36929Exploring the Viability of Agent-Based Modeling to Extend QualitativeResearch: Comparison of Computational PlatformsSamantha Splendido, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Sam Splendido is a Ph.D. student in Mechanical Engineering at Pennsylvania State University. She is cur- rently a graduate research assistant under Dr. Catherine Berdanier in the Engineering Cognitive Research Laboratory (ECRL). She earned her B.S. in Biomedical and Mechanical Engineering from Pennsylvania State University.Catherine G. P. Berdanier, Pennsylvania State University Catherine G.P. Berdanier is an Assistant
. The evaluated class consisted of mixed instruction, comprisedof laboratory sections focusing on the use of CAD software to design machine components andhands-on sessions teaching the use of conventional machine tools to fabricate said parts [19].Course synopsis and learning objectives are presented in Table 1.Table 1. Details concerning the course subject to student evaluation [19] Course name and code Engineering Design Tools MECE-104 Synopsis This course combines the elements of Design process, Computer Aided Design (CAD), and Machine Shop Fabrication in the context of a design/build/test project
], and construction of a community or supportsystem [7][5][12].A common theme amongst many transfer programs is that they allow students to participate inundergraduate research experiences. It can allow students to build connections with peers andnetwork with faculty or other researchers, as well as provide them with the experience of puttingtheir skills to work in the laboratory setting [1][5]. In some instances, the participation ofundergraduate students in research projects leads to a higher percentage of graduating studentsthan those who did not participate [11].Feeling connected and building a community is also a common finding among the programs.Transfer students may feel particularly alone as they begin their new programs [10
Paper ID #37519Improving the Quality of Data Graphics in Materials EducationDr. Barry Dupen, Purdue University Fort Wayne Dr. Dupen is a Metallurgist and Professor of Mechanical Engineering Technology at Purdue University Fort Wayne (PFW). He has nine years of experience as a metallurgist, materials engineer, and materials laboratory manager in the automotive industry. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Improving the Quality of Data Graphics in Materials EducationAbstractMaterials education is an inherently image-intensive and data-rich endeavor. Educators draw onprimary and secondary
set within a liberal arts college. The course meets twice a week for eightyminutes with labs integrated into the class time. The intended learning outcomes are: • Develop a conceptual understanding of the properties of soil, water flow through soil, volume changes in soil and soil strength. • Develop problem solving competence for soil phase diagrams; engineering classification of soils; 1-d water flow in soils; flow nets and 2-d seepage; effective stress in soil for hydrostatic, 1-d flow, 2-d flow and capillary rise; stress distributions caused by various loading shapes; amount and rate of consolidation; shear strength of soil; and soil compaction. • Become familiar with laboratory soil tests and field sampling and
teaching manufacturing systems, engineering systems anddesign, engineering management, health care systems, and lean six-sigma process improvement;all subjects in which students need to gain an understanding of complex systems.Many teaching simulations are implemented physically, as laboratory or table-top systems. Thesesimulations have the advantage of being direct (if often simplified and miniaturized) models ofthe systems in question, allowing tactile learning from manipulating the simulation elements, andfostering face-to-face teamwork by the participating students. The idea of implementing suchsimulations in virtual environments seems promising. Theoretically, these implementationsshould be cheap, easy to implement, and universally available
Paper ID #37179Fostering Community at the Graduate Level: One University’s Student-ledApproachHaroula M. Tzamaras, Pennsylvania State University Haroula is a 3rd year PhD candidate studying human factors at Penn State and is the current president of GradWIE.Sierra HicksGabriella M. Sallai, Pennsylvania State University Gaby Sallai is currently a graduate student in the Mechanical Engineering department at Penn State. She is working under Dr. Catherine Berdanier in the Engineering Cognitive Research Laboratory (ECRL) studying the experiences of engineering graduate students. She received her Bachelor’s degree from
7. Discuss different interior finish systems 8. Prepare (write) a technical laboratory report and site visit report 1. Apply quality management tools, techniques and standards for construction engineering.Quality Management and 2. Explain the implications of project delivery methods, contract documents, and contract language on the quality of construction projects. 3. Discuss common quality issues in life cycle of construction projects.Labor Relations 4. Describe bond, guaranty, and warranty as they
following sections.The challenge is solved by teams formed of 4 students; from now on, the teams will becalled Kaizen-teams, Kaizen is a Japanese word referring to continuous improvement. The Figure 1: Kaizen i-Semester Modelcourses in the Kaizen i-Semester are Systems Engineering Laboratory, Analysis and En-hancement of Manufacturing Systems, Facilities Design and Material Management, In-ventory Management, Production Management, Ethics and Citizenship, and OperationalDesign and Optimization Laboratory.The essence of the Kaizen i-Semester is the challenge, composed of ten steps divided intofour stages as shown in Figure 2. Highlighting students’ feedback in each stage is essentialto guide them toward better performance
specialty prod- ucts at the Research Center of Petroleos de Venezuela PDVSA (1983-1998). He is a founding member of Universidad Monteavila (Caracas, Venezuela) (1998—2018), became the Chancellor of this univer- sity (2005-2015), and the President of the Center for Higher Studies (2015-2018), where he also taught courses on the humanities. After rejoining the University of Pittsburgh, he has been teaching Pillar courses on Reactive Process Engineering, Process Control, Process Control Laboratory, and Process Design. In addition to technical courses, his service extends to engineering education, curriculum development, out- reach programs, global awareness, sustainability, and diversity, equity and inclusion.Dr. April
infrastructure, we ask the following research question:RQ: How do technology infrastructures shape problem-solving practices in STEM labs? MethodsWe collected data from three interdisciplinary STEM laboratories from three differentuniversities in North America. Over a period of 16 months, we conducted 27 interviews (19Zoom interviews and 8 on-site in-person interviews), attended 26 lab meetings, and shadowedthree lab members in-person. Remote interviews and meeting observations began in thebeginning of the Covid-19 pandemic in Spring 2020. However, we also conducted in-personinterviews and observations in October 2023 when travel was considered relatively safe with
Paper ID #38585Collaborating with Aviation Museums to Enhance Authentic Assessments forAerospace StructuresDr. Craig Merrett, Clarkson University Dr. Merrett is an associate professor in the Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, and leads the Aero-Servo-Thermo-Visco-Elasticity Laboratory. His research relates to viscoelastic modelling of materials used in aerospace vehicles including composite aircraft, hypersonic aircraft, and spacecraft. Dr. Merrett also teaches courses in aircraft structural analysis, aircraft accidents, and aeroelasticity. Last, Dr. Merrett researches the use of flipped-classroom
breadboard, andtaking electrical measurements in a series of integrated laboratory-lecture experiences. The classculminates in an open-ended design project in which the student proposes a system that uses amicrocontroller to accomplish a useful task. While open-ended “capstone” design projects are amainstay of engineering curricula, first-year “cornerstone” projects that introduce the designprocess to novice engineering students have recently become more prominent (Sheppard et al.,2009, pp. 84, 91; Vest, 2005; Whitfield et al., 2011; Zajdel & Maharbiz, 2016b). We propose thatsuch design experiences would be impactful to non-major students’ technical education as well.Students outside of the engineering disciplines can develop these technical
explored the life cycle of systemsin the manufacturing, transportation, and energy sectors. In the laboratory, he is pursuingcomplementary research in the phase behavior and surface chemistry of carbon dioxide mixturesat high pressure. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2023
].STEM academic positions often require substantial needs for laboratory space andinstrumentation, along with startup funding that often comes with timeline constraints, all ofwhich can pose particular challenges when disabilities are not considered in the design andimplementation of the workplaces. Furthermore, despite decades of research that has addressedincreasing diversity among STEM faculty, very little work has addressed accessibility and equityfor disabled faculty. Conference participation poses challenges for some faculty with disabilitiesranging from access to spaces, accessible technology, sign language interpreters, extra travelexpenses, and appropriate food [27]. Further, communication and networking with otherparticipants can be
B.S. and M.S. degrees in Engineering Mechanics from Virginia Tech, and his Ph.D. in Bioengineering from the University of Utah. He worked in the Air Force Research Laboratories before teaching at the U.S. Air Force Academy for seven years. Brian has taught in the Mechanical Engineering Department at Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo since 2006. During the 2011-2012 academic year he participated in a professor exchange, teaching at the Munich University of Applied Sciences. His engineering education interests include collaborating on the Dynamics Concept Inventory, developing model-eliciting activities in mechanical engineering courses, inquiry-based learning in mechanics, and design projects to help promote adapted
• Network Theory II • Instrumentation and Networks Laboratory • System Dynamics and ControlThe following learning support or assessment instruments have incorporated them to variousdegrees. • Homework • In-class exercise • In-class quiz • Midterm • FinalFor assignments, the author might set up the first few steps of a problem with unlimited onlineverification while the later steps do not have any support so that the students will know that theyare on the right track to solve the problem, and they still need to think independently.For quizzes, the problems are often short and direct. It is a quick way to assess the class’sprogress and help the students identify areas to improve.For exams, the students will sign an
Development in UW–Madison College of En- gineering’s Inclusion, Equity, and Diversity in Engineering (IEDE) Office, and the Assistant Director of Wisconsin’s Equity and Inclusion Laboratory (Wei LAB). Don also serves as PI and co-PI of multiple NSF-funded projects, including: the NSF Eddie Bernice Johnson INCLUDES Aspire Alliance, the NSF IUSE: Inclusive STEM Teaching Project, and the NSF LEAPS: EVOLVED project. He received his Ph.D. in Cell & Molecular Biology (University of Wisconsin-Madison) and B.S. in Biology (Bucknell University). ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023Creating Inclusivity in Engineering Teaching and Learning Contexts: Adapting the Aspire
Laboratories in Jacksonville, Florida, whichkilled four people and injured 32 others. The incident, which occurred on December 19, 2007, waslinked to the failure of the cooling system in the runaway chemical reaction during the productionof a gasoline additive. Following the discussion of this video, the students were assigned a take-home quiz to report on some of the common errors in the chemical plant which can impact publichealth and safety. Students reviewed the literature and generated a written report highlighting theengineer's responsibility to make informed decisions while designing solutions. The students wereexplicitly advised to discuss an engineer's socioeconomic, environmental, and culturalresponsibilities. The students were evaluated on
. This is due to two unique factors:(1) ECE students have inherently self-selected—and thus, already anticipated—a curriculum thatexpects them to master electronic and digital devices and environments, and (2) many hands-on,active-learning laboratory activities in ECE involve measurements with instruments nowavailable in miniaturized, mobile, low-cost realizations. Therefore, in the new normal,combinations of online, face-to-face, asynchronous, and synchronous instruction can elevatestudent learning by: ● Using online tech to deliver basic knowledge content (instead of live lectures), freeing up more instructor time to provide personalized coaching with individual students. ● Transferring low-value-added, time-consuming tasks (e.g
students [5]. Robotics education can be started fromelementary school or even kindergartens [6] for providing students with learning-by-doingapproach based on the constructionism theory by Seymour Papert of the MassachusettsInstitute of Technology's Media Laboratory [7]. However, most existing robotics tools are essentially toys with limited or no practical usage.After completing parts assembly, they are mostly displayed inside the child’s room. Some,not many, are associated with coding, though largely still at a rudimentary level, which maynot lead to comprehensive programming studies. Such products can also be quite expensivelypriced, with a minimum price tag of a couple of hundred US dollars, which is mostly forwealthy households. A typical
students forteaching recitation sections and laboratories with majority Latino/a/x students, teachingassistants were required to take one of two engineering education courses as part of their fundedassistantship. This requirement is also part of a new initiative from the College of Engineering tobetter prepare engineering educators. Although courses in engineering education became arequirement for engineering students, graduate students within different STEM departments alsowere allowed to enrolled in these courses. The preliminary data presented in this paper was thefirst engineering education course that they took as part of this requirement. It is important tonote that the enrollment demographics included 53 doctoral engineering students of
an introduction to the one-semester study abroad programs and laboratory internship options at our institution.3. For overseas participants to gain an understanding of Japanese culture and its unique impact on the field of robotics.4. For Japanese students to learn more about their own culture and history.The MGUDS-S Since the 2019 academic year, the MGUDS-S tool has been the standard method used atSIT to evaluate all the online study abroad programs conducted at our institution. It wascreated by Prof. Marie Miville at Columbia University in the United States [1], [2], with aJapanese version later being developed by Oda et al [3]. It consists of a 15-question writtensurvey, with responses scored on a 6-point Likert scale. The MGUDS-S
an integrationof technological devices into classroom learning that does not require a specialized laboratory forconducting such experiments. The study adopted a survey and assessment methodology for datacollection. Data were collected pre-and post-implementation of the module in the course where itwas implemented. The study found that there was a significant improvement in learners' peerlearning and collaboration, as well as critical thinking. The test anxiety of the learners was alsoimproved. The performance of the learners was also found to increase significantly. The study waslimited to some courses taken at different levels of learning in different fields to avoid more thanone dosage of the implementation among the learners. In addition
Paper ID #37271Designing Learning Experiences with a Low-Cost Robotic ArmProf. Eric Markvicka, University of Nebraska-Lincoln Dr. Eric Markvicka is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln (UNL). There, he also holds a courtesy appointment in the De- partment of Electrical and Computer Engineering and the School of Computing. At UNL Dr. Markvicka directs the Smart Materials and Robotics Laboratory, an interdisciplinary research lab that is creating the next generation of wearable electronics and robotics that are primarily composed of