of Engineering Education and Centers undergrant number EEC-0343214 (Department-Level Reform Program), by the NSF Division ofUndergraduate Education under grant numbers DUE-0618571 (CCLI Phase 2), DUE-0622466(STEP Type 1) and DUE-0817332 (CCLI Phase 3), and by a Teaching Enhancement Fund grantat Wright State University. Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressedin this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation or Wright State University.Bibliography1. McKenna, A., McMartin, F. and Agogino, A., 2000, "What Students Say About Learning Physics, Math and Engineering," Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference, Vol. 1, T1F-9.2. Sathianathan, D
research in the fields of game theory and optimization applied to public health and humanitarian logistics systems. Support for this work was provided by National Science Foundation award number CMMI-1228110. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the funding organization. Page 24.1267.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Toward Broadening Participation: Understanding Students’ Perceptions of Industrial EngineeringIntroductionAdvances in engineering are critical to
for Traffic Signal Engineering. 120th ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Conference Compendium.AcknowledgementThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.DUE-1235896. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation. Page 24.1270.9References1. Antonucci, N.D., K.K. Hardy, K.L. Slack, R. Pfefer and T.R. Neuman, "Nchrp Report 500 Volume 12: A Guide for Addressing Collisions at Signalized Intersections." Transportation Research Board
conclusions we have drawn are of particular interest, sincethese affect persistence studies in all disciplines.AcknowledgementsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF) underGrant 1129383 in the Research on Engineering Education (REE) program. The opinionsexpressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of NSF.References1 M. W. Ohland, C. E. Brawner, M. M. Camacho, R. A. Layton, R. A. Long, S. M. Lord, and M. H. Wasburn, (2011). “Race, Gender, and Measures of Success in Engineering Education,” Journal of Engineering Education, 100(2), 225-252. Won Wickenden Award as Best Paper in the Journal for 20112 S. M. Lord, R. A. Layton, and M. W. Ohland, (2011
classes were held in the laboratory. For this course, thissetting eases the flexible adoption of a variety of teaching methods, depending on thecharacteristics of different course topics in sequence. The main teaching formats and materialemployed in this course are presented as the following.At the beginning, we used power point slides presentation and class discussion to introducestudents the topics on defining real-time systems. These topics are basis for further learning.Thus, it is important to help students to set up a solid and comprehensive foundation. In the classdiscussion, some questions are designed to enable students to reflect on key concepts in real-timesystems, and to encourage active learning. Here are some examples: 1) Are real
toindividual student assignments without providing connections to previous or future work, ordirectly to learning outcomes. Monitoring proficiency toward each standard allows for a richerassessment and reflection of student achievement.Various educational benefits from SBG arise as a result of the personalized, clear, andmeaningful feedback provided to students regarding their learning and development.Assessments are made about the quality of student work based on specific objectives thatstudents are made aware of at the beginning of a course.1 This provides fairness and transparencyby grading each individual student based on the quality of their current work alone, regardless ofhow other students in the course perform or on the student’s previous
this paper is to provide details of theunified bioengineering “overview” curriculum. The curriculum development of Temple University’s (TU)department has been hiring faculty from a wide variety of Bioengineering program as an example to other programs thatbioengineering specialties and the difficulty came with the may wish to include a broader spectrum of areas within theirdevelopment of the curriculum that reflected this diversity. undergraduate bioengineering curricula.The bioengineering curriculum was modified using thebackward course design concept [1] by looking at the contents II. CURRICULUM NEEDSof the proposed senior capstone classes and redesigning theseven
foundationalstep increases the depth of student understanding in an area tools provide students with the information that is necessarywhere they expressed an initial interest. Students have to move forward to the second level of the taxonomy whichresponded very positively about the experience and reflected that focuses on Comprehension by Bloom or Understanding asit provides a unique learning opportunity. The framework can defined in the revised taxonomy. If students can explainbe adapted to a variety of disciplines. concepts, the ideas are clearer to
: material while interning at the Pease NH Air Force Base. In this section of the paper we are going to highlight why While I was faced with deciphering codes and symbols, athe two student authors were interested in working on the myriad of questions populated my mind. It was theseinteractive e-book for the AISC Steel Sculpture. The ideas questions that became the foundational objectives when weexpressed by Kayla Santello in the following started to produce the book. The answers to my questionsparagraphs reflect the perspectives of both student authors. manifested themselves as the main topics and chapters in the iBook. I used
the computers used well as the general observations of the participating faculty,for all other exercises, placement of this step at the end was also reflect the overall success of the goals.more convenient. This capability also allows the turnaround By presenting the advantages, disadvantages, andfor the next session to be reduced to simply powering off the repercussions of the evolution of communications systems,laptops and rebooting them from the DVD copy of TAILS, alongside the technologies that provide various attributes andeasily accommodating the approximately fifteen minute capabilities, a compelling picture of
resolution at a 300-km orbit.related to the initial velocity, size, and composition of theimpacting material based on extensive calibration of aerogel The greater separation of the GPS CubeSat as compared to(e.g., Kearsley, A, et al., 2012 Experimental impact features the DC/PIP satellites enables them both to transmitin Stardust aerogel: How track morphology reflects particle simultaneously without encountering interference problemsstructure, composition, and density, MAPS 47(4) among for some portion of the mission. This doubles the maximumothers). We also plan to complete additional calibration amount of data that can be downlinked, expanding the datatesting at the NASA Ames Vertical Gun Range for the
underwater wireless power along large distance of propagation in an underwatercommunication is accompanied by various physical and communication [4].technical factors which we discussed in an introduction. In In this sensors network model, we wish to retransmit theUWC, transmission loss is due to absorption, spreading, received signal to another sensor node exactly as they arepropagation, surface reflection, and channel noise. In our received. Thus, in order to obtain the input-output statisticswork, conditional entropy is used to quantify the of the cascade, we need only to consider the signal as oneinformation loss induced by passing pseudorandom (PN) sample at a
, which is responsible of change the path of the vehicle in case if there is an obstacle. Ultrasonic sensor works by transmitting pulse of ultrasonic wave and measuring the echo pulse width, which is received from reflection of objects. After that, it calculates the distance between the target and sensor “Fig. 11”. In addition, there are three pins, which are specified as
new management reflect these concerns, and how will capacities for action; it is about creating learning processes. technologies contribute? 3) Knowledge capture – Knowledge has to be selected, By integrating learning with knowledge management, the chosen and archived. Here the challenge is capturing tacit understanding of education will be dramatically extended knowledge as well as explicit knowledge. It is important to towards learning through practical work, lifelong learning, establish processes in order to formalize and self-directed learning, particularly when linked to 4) Knowledge preservation. This knowledge has to be dynamically changing
ensure that those carrying out social marketing are Sciences, 2013. 36(2): p. 163-180.not misapplying its basic tenets. As noted in the models[14] Garfield, E., Citation indexes in sociological and Case of the World Wide Web Technology. historical research. American documentation, 1963. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 1996. 14(4): p. 289-291. 1(1): p. 95-126.[15] Haigh, N., Historical research and research in [31] Lazer, W., Marketing's Changing Social higher education: Reflections and recommendations Relationships. Journal of Marketing, 1969. 33(1): p. from a self-study
, Pedagogies of Engagement: Classroom-Based Practices.discipline and of a Master’s degree student. Also, at the end of ASEE Journal of Engineering Education, v. 94, n.1, 2005, p.87 -102.the experiment, the students were requested to reflect and [8] D. W. JOHNSON, R. T. JOHNSON, and K. A. SMITH, Cooperative Learning: Increasing College Faculty Instructional Productivity. ASHE-discuss about any mistakes committed and problems found ERIC Relatório de Educação Superior, Universidade Georgewhile performing the task. Washington, 1991
multi-path reflections and interference Sensor Network Design Based on ZigBee in from other systems [18]. Petrochemical Industry Field. in Intelligent 3. Bandwidth availability for Networks and Intelligent Systems, 2008. ICINIS communications limits the information '08. First International Conference on. 2008. bandwidth of the device, it limits the 9. Gungor, V.C.H., G. P., Industrial Wireless Sensor Networks: Challenges, Design Principles, number of independent sensors that can
measuring sensor and a motorized RC vehicle to create an embedded control system. The distance measuring sensor is the feedback signal, and the output is a DC motor which controls the position of the vehicle. The controller maintains the vehicle within 20cm – 30cm from a reflective surface. The setup is shown in figure 2. Figure 2. Feedback loop embedded system.3. Multi-Processor Communication using a SPI protocol: The goal of this experiment was to establish communication between processors using Serial Peripheral Interface (SPI). One processor was configured as a Master, and two were configured as Slaves. The Master was programmed to send a message to the Slaves consecutively. The Slaves were programmed to
towards acommon goal, has become an industry trend1 . This recently adopted trajectory accurately reflects therealities of the twenty-first-century: any sustainable solution to the problems humanity is currentlyfacing requires an integrated and interactive mix of sciences, engineering, social sciences, andhumanities2. As a result, modern education needs to prepare future scientists and engineers to not onlyexplore the boundaries within their own disciplines, but to also understand the basics of other fields.The Accreditation Board of Engineering and Technology (ABET) acknowledges the importance ofmultidisciplinary education and explicitly supports it3. In fact, the 2013-2014 criteria for accreditingEngineering programs requires the programs to
, 1(2), 49-69.33. Nikolic, D., Messner, J.I., Lee, S., and Anumba, C. (2010) The Virtual Construction Simulator - development of an educational simulation game. Proceedings of the International Conference on Computing in Civil and Building 2010, Nottingham, UK.34. Oakley, B.A., Hanna, D.M., Kuzmyn, Z. (2007). “Best Practices Involving Teamwork in the Classroom: Results from a Survey of 6435 Engineering Student Respondents,” IEEE Transactions on Education, 50(3).35. O'Brien, W., Soibelman, L., and Elvin, G. Collaborative Design Processes; An V Active-and Reflective- Learning Course in Multidisciplinary Collaboration. Journal of Construction Education, 2003, Vol. B, pp. 78- 93.36. Prince, M. J. and Felder, R. M., 2006
Structural and Earthquake Engineering.Incorporating research with the Senior Design Project helps the student researcher developsolutions to real engineering problems.AcknowledgementThis research is supported by the National Science Foundation under the award numberCMMI1227962. The authors would also like to acknowledge support from San Francisco StateUniversity ORSP Grant SP692. Any opinions, findings, conclusions and recommendationsexpressed in this paper are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of thesponsors.References1. Chen, C., et al. (2009). "Real-time hybrid testing using the unconditionally stable explicit CR integration algorithm." Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 38(1): 23-44.2. Darby, A.P, et
award number CMMI-1227962. The authors would also like to acknowledge support from San Francisco StateUniversity ORSP Grant SP692 as well as the help of Cañada Community College and thecooperation of NASA Curriculum Improvements Partnership Award for the Integration ofResearch CIPAIR. Any opinions, findings conclusions and recommendations expressed in thispaper are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the sponsors.References1. Chen, C. and Ricles, J. M. (2012), Large-scale real-time hybrid simulation involving multiple experimental substructures and adaptive actuator delay compensation. Earthquake Engng. Struct. Dyn., 41: 549–569. doi: 10.1002/eqe.11442. Chen, C., Sharma, R. and Pong, W.S., (2012), “Assessing
it was a practice session 30 minutes was allotted. 5. Several students wrote about the process and exercise in their course journals. Overall those who discussed it were very positive about the experience.The following instructor concerns surfaced in reflecting on the exercise. A recommendation foraddress each concern is also proposed.Q: Do we need two practice sessions and two recording sessions or is that overkill?A: Do only one practice session and two record sections. Allocate some general class time after the session to exchange general feedback on the process, the outcomes, and the lessons learned.Q: The instructor assigned teams and additional duties. Should the process be done randomly?A: Yes, students should be
Page 24.495.7other verbal disfluencies, as I could muster. Many readers may find this transcription methodunnecessary and even a display of poor judgment on my part as a “scholar.” I must thereforejustify this transcription as based on a methodology that aims to show, rather than summarize,how the interview participant talked about their experience, providing some idea of the difficultiesin relating this information during the interview, and really provide the reader with some sense ofthe reflection the participant had to undergo to describe their experience. I thought that my choiceof transcription method fell in line with the overall goal of this paper. I wrote this paper to showwhy events like the KDS are valuable tools for engineers to
with the highestcode density and variety to obtain a teacher’s best example of instructional practice, (b) maintainthe proportion of the before, during, and after segments to reflect the overall structure of theentire unedited lesson, and (c) maintain the continuity of the lesson so that segments were neverless than two minutes in length. As an example of this editing process, if a teacher’s entire 40minute lesson consisted of 15 minutes of before activity, 20 minutes of during, and 5 minutes ofafter activity, the 20 minute edited version would consist of 7.5, 10, and 2.5 minutes from eachrespective activity. To retain continuity, additional video was selected, if needed, to providenecessary context and/or to reach the minimum of a two-minute
National Science Foundation (NSF EEC1227110; NSF EEC 0956819). Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations Page 24.609.14expressed in this material are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of theNational Science Foundation.Bibliography1. Chang, R. P. H. (2006). A call for nanoscience education. Nano Today, 1, 6-7.2. Lu, K. (2009), A study of engineering freshman regarding nanotechnology understanding, Journal of STEM Education, 10, 7-16.3. Delgado, C. (2009). Development of a research-based learning progression for middle school through undergraduate students’ conceptual
concepts. Continued poor performance inthermodynamics is linked to students not grasping key concepts and failing to recognize how toapply relevant concepts in solving problems.(1) Many students succeed at algorithmic problemsolving yet have difficulty explaining the physical systems being described by the mathematics.This is reflected in low scores on concept inventory exams which require minimal mathematicalcalculations, but are designed around common misconceptions.(2,3)Poor learning has been linked to not being able to correctly assess the information provided andbegins with a lack of clear understanding of the fundamental concepts. A coherent framing ofproblems is essential to reason through new problems.(4) To address this, teachers often
found career success in some form or another, while moststudents are still exploring potential career options. Consequently, their views on the world,motivation, and future goals likely reflect their current status. A longitudinal study examininghow perceptions of entrepreneurship change based on career status and stages of adultdevelopment would be benefit and provide more insight on this issue. It is clear, however, that students and faculty members possess differentconceptualizations of entrepreneurship. Therefore, it is important to continually track students’perceptions in order to ensure that they view their education as relevant to their future careersand other personal goals. In entrepreneurial education, this may involve