to race, ethnicity, gender, sexual orientation, age, socialclass, physical ability or attributes, religious or ethical value system, national origin, and politicalbeliefs”. Inclusion is defined as “involvement and empowerment, where the inherent worth anddignity of all people are recognized.” Equity is defined as “the state, quality, or ideal of being just,impartial, and fair” [1].Educational leaders must embody the mission and vision of their institution to frame diversityissues in the campus community. This work can occur in the engineering classroom. Missiondriven educational institutions typically prioritize initiatives and activities that support theinstitution’s mission. Historically white and predominantly white institutions (PWI
ethics and social responsibility, community engagement in engineering, and the experiences of low-income and first- generation students in engineering. She has a B.S. in electrical engineering from MIT and an M.S. and Ph.D. in electrical engineering from Stanford University.Fatemeh Khalkhal Dr. Khalkhal is an assistant professor in mechanical engineering at San Francisco State University (a primarily undergraduate and Hispanic-serving Institution). Her research experience is in developing structure-property relationships in complex fluids and polymer composites, broadening the participation of women and underrepresented minorities in engineering, and understanding the relationship between teamwork experience and
department called “Thinking ThroughLiterature” and one in the Philosophy department called “Engaging Philosophy”). Students maytake these alongside EGR 110, but never before EGR 110. Later in their education, engineeringstudents take two additional courses (known as ‘Writing in Discipline’) to practice writing for theirprofessional contexts.Engineering faculty members teach 7-8 EGR 110 sections of approximately 30 students each(around 200 students total). The faculty and students cover all four disciplines offered at UP –Computer Science and Civil, Electrical, and Mechanical Engineering. Students design and build atabletop wind turbine while learning engineering via five overarching topics: design process,hands-on skills, teamwork, ethics/impact
Neural Network (CNN) Architecture (conceptual) - Convolutional kernel (basis for CNN) - Potential Network Training Problems - Human Bias and Ethics - DL applied to photography (examples) - NMIST database of digit images 2 - Transfer Learning - MATLAB code for transfer learning; hyperparameters - Advantages of transfer learning - Overfitting in DL networks - Overview of pretrained networks - Interfacing MATLAB to other DL networks (Tensorflow, PyTorch, etc.) - Project: DL image classifier for cracker/cookie defect detector using MATLAB
ability tocommunicate orally and in writing. Advising students with psychological problems,according to personality, professional skills, standards, and work ethic, appears as one of theprimary professional skills [20]. Finally, an interview with personnel at an EcuadorUniversity shows the balance between soft, technological, and critical thinking skills inteachers for Education 4.0 [19], [21]. The "Future of Manufacturing" report mentioned thatIndustry 4.0 would be converged, connected, and collaborative in the next ten years "drivenprimarily by pressures on businesses to achieve the outcomes of improved productivity,production output, profitability/costs, competitivity, and sustainability and the circulardesign." In this sense, new roles and
engineeringbackgrounds, as well their hands-on research experience and working on a paper. However,many students felt there was not enough time in the course for research and writing. Othernegative experiences included feeling they did not understand the purpose of assignments on thecourse learning management system and other team members were not contributing. At thebeginning of the semester, assignments focused on ethics, teaming, how to do a literature reviewand document research, and other preliminary topics. Students wanted to dive right into theresearch rather than completing training and pre-research activities. Additionally, journalassignments requested that students reflect on their experiences weekly. Engineering students arenot accustomed to
-9]. In additionto individual aptitude and work ethics, researchers have identified other individual psychologicalconstructs that play an influential role in retention rates among engineers [e.g., 10]. One of thepsychological constructs that have been identified as a key factor in student persistence inengineering is motivation.Researchers have identified several types of motivational factors (e.g., sense of belonging)initiated via the expectancy-value theory of motivation [11-13]. In its simplest form, the theorypostulates that decisions to continue in activities, such as earning an engineering degree, areformed by beliefs in competency and value. Competency beliefs are defined as individualexpectations of success, and encompass one’s
during recruitment of students tothe civil engineering major.BackgroundAs the name implies, this seminar-based course introduces students to the civil engineeringprofession through discussions covering a range of topics including: the engineering designcycle, required components of a profession, Codes of Ethics, and sustainability. The course wasfirst incorporated in the curriculum during the fall semester of 2018, and it has been deliveredevery fall semester since. The course is delivered by a team of two or three instructors. The samegroup of instructors has not been in place throughout the five years. Enrollment in the course hasaveraged 42 students per semester.One of the writing assignments in CE201 requires students to write a 2–3-page
range offactors (e.g. gender, race/ethnicity, individual beliefs, salience). Some individuals may see their work as aform of spiritual service, while others may be guided by religious beliefs when making ethical decisionsin their work. We believe this study will give a glimpse into how a woman’s religious identity caninfluence their engineering identity which could lead to greater understanding of the role of religion inengineering spaces and encourage more effective support structures. MethodologyThis study was part of a larger National Science Foundation (NSF) funded qualitative, phenomenologicalresearch study which examined the engineering identity development experiences of electrical
To develop technical engineering skillsFor your own happiness For financial reasonsBecause it suited your interests Service opportunityTo become a better leader Other (please describe)For networking purposesWhat, if any, professional skills do you feel that your co-curricular activities have helpedyou to develop? (multi-select)Critical thinking Oral written communicationProblem solving Leadership skillsEngineering design TeamworkCreativity Professional ethical integrityComputer skills NetworkingTime
include creating and sustaining a cultureof diversity, equity, and a culture of inclusion through tools of self-assessment of networkactivities, the development of values and ethics, and the opportunity to share findings to serve asguidance for other research networks.The network leadership also introduced a self-reported demographic information survey for theresearch network. The anonymous survey on self-reported demographic information providesvaluable data to assess the current representation and participation of individuals from diversebackgrounds. The collected data will help identify potential disparities in access andopportunities and guide the development of targeted strategies to increase diversity and equity inthe network.Table 1
course and bring hands-on experienceto their students.IntroductionLaboratory work has a strong impact on students’ learning and play important role in engineeringeducation. Labs help students to learn the concepts in depth and to gain practical skills, so theycould succeed both academically and in their careers. In the labs students learn how to integratetheory and practice. The labs also teach students hypothesis forming, experimental design andevaluation of results. In most cases, students work as a team in labs which help them with ethics,communications, report writing and team working skills. A survey of student perceptions of thelab work has been published [1]. They found that engineering students see themselves asessentially practical, and
Paper ID #37463WIP: Comparing Engineering Faculty’s Perceptions ofUndergraduate Student Writing Abilities with Students’ Self-PerceptionsAmy K Barton (Coordinator and Instructor) Coordinator of the Shackouls Technical Communication Program at Mississippi State University; research interests include engineering ethics, faculty development, writing in the disciplines, professional communicationJohn Aaron Louis Grimes (Instructor) (Mississippi State University) Aaron is currently an instructor in the Shackouls Technical Communication Program in Mississippi State University’s James Worth Bagley College of Engineering
and Work Engagement are highalthough they decreased. On the other hand, the decrease in Social Responsibility after the sixthsemester is consistent with Cech 13 , who observed a decline in public welfare throughoutundergraduate students’ education. However, the sample Social Responsibility rate remains highdespite the decrease. It is plausible that working for the Women in Engineering Program providesexperiences that become pillars to sustain student workers’ Social Responsibility. WIEP studentworkers are exposed to multiple experiences that encourage public welfare considerations andactively engage students workers’ ethical and cultural beliefs.Our results show that WIEP student workers have a high Work Meaningfulness and
(2016-2018). She is the Senior Editor for the International Journal for Service Learning in Engineering (IJSLE) and a Deputy Editor for the ASCE Journal of Civil Engineering Education. Her research focuses on engineering education, including ethics, social responsibility, sustainable engineering, and community engagement. Bielefeldt is also a Fellow of the American Society for Engineering Education. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com AbstractMilitary training programs, such as the Security Cooperation Humanitarian Assistance (HA)program for international engagements and the Innovative Readiness Training (IRT) program
Research Ethics Board, students will beasked to report on the usability and effectiveness of the OER through Likert questions and aroundtable run by a student researcher. To investigate if their perceptions towards OpenEducation Resources in general changes through the textbook’s use, certain questions will beasked both at the beginning and the end of the semester. Towards the end of the term, studentswill also be challenged to contribute to the Open textbook through an assignment on creating aninteractive textbook element (e.g., a drag-and-drop task, a matching task, or a quiz). Selectedstudent works, as voted by the students themselves, will then be incorporated to the text. We arereally excited about this upcoming collaboration with students in
= not confident at all; 5= absolutely confident), theaverage response increased from 3.59 in the pre-survey to 4.29 on the post-survey (P=0.003). Tothis point, GS6 stated, GIFT has made me consider how I will represent my discipline as a STEM professional. This includes making ethical research decisions, not ignoring injustices within my field, and communicating ideas from my field to others. It's made me think a lot more about how important it is to be able to share my findings with a larger audience. It's also made me think about my responsibility as a STEM professional to teach and mentor students within my field.Similarly, GS9 shared that he felt an increased responsibility to share his work with
college, immigrant, single parent, veteran. Each podcast has been converted into an .mp4 video file and can be viewed on MNT-EC’s YouTube channel as well. 4. The Journal of Advanced Technological Education (J ATE) launches January 31, 2022 and is a place for Community College faculty to publish peer-reviewed research papers and articles on their work in technician education. The team collaboratively worked on and finalized preparing the journal guidelines including instructions, ethical and publication policies. A major accomplishment was preparing author guidelines, instructions and templates specific to the J ATE. A submission website has also been created for the
-to-day activities, and at times such workincludes potentially far-reaching ethical judgements. To shift our undergraduate degreeprograms from a means-focused technical discipline to one in which students are also equippedto use their technical skills in solving complex, convergent problems in social and humancontexts there are four consecutive activities that the project is undertaking.First is that the department is in the early stages of is introducing convergent projects across thecurriculum. A challenge the project is currently facing is determining criteria to classify aproject as ‘convergent’. At this stage the working criteria are that: 1) problems which aresocially relevant and impact society; 2) problems that are not fully bounded
3 4 55 4.35 0.88 ability to function on a team20 23 8 5 56 4.04 0.93 ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems24 20 10 2 56 4.18 0.85 understanding of professional and ethical responsibility20 22 12 2 56 4.07 0.84 ability to communicate effectively27 16 10 2 1 56 4.18 0.97 understanding of the impact of eng’g, etc.27 13 13 3 56 4.14 0.95 understand the need for life-long learning
males. IntroductionSince 1991 the author has taught, each fall and spring semester, a required, projectoriented, introduction to design course at the sophomore level in the Department ofMechanical Engineering at the University of Houston to between 35 and 55 students.While the course content has changed very little over the past ten years (engineering inthe global prospective, the design process, shop practice, introduction to manufacturing,engineering communications, specifications, personality and group issues, codes andstandards, intellectual property, engineering ethics, and introduction to engineeringeconomy), the projects have changed every semester. (See Reference 1 for moreinformation about the
methodsimprove abilities in communication, leadership, ethical decision making, and criticalthinking (Steven et al., 2002), in addition to achieving learning objectives related tocontent. Active learning, partnered with the instructor in traditional Engineering Proceedings of the 2005 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi Copyright 2005, American Society for Engineering Educationclassrooms, can generate powerful results for the learner by teaching how theory can beput into practiceEvents of this decade have created a dramatic paradigm shift in engineering andtechnology education. The changing demands and expectations of employers, as well
mixture of professional backgrounds and experiences. Throughout the semester, thestudents are expected to show evidence of significant individual contributions to the team efforts,consideration related to design’s effectiveness, material selection, ergonomics, safety, cost, effecton the environment, ethics, ease of production, etc. The course offers the perfect platform forimplementing the Engineering Unleashed’ s mission to graduate engineers with anentrepreneurial mindset (EM) and KEEN’s mission to teach technical skills while fosteringcuriosity, connections, and creating value [1], [2].As part of the course, all teams are required to make two presentations to their peers and thecourse instructor, and to submit a Project Proposal and a Final
) PI_4_2: Understand technology, its application, and potential consequences Key Assignment: Project 1 Justification: Project 1 requires the student to identify problems which require AI for solutions. The student must understand technology, its application, and potential consequences (PI_4_2). Project 1 measures the ability to recognize ethical and professional responsibilities in engineering situations and make informed judgments, which must consider the impact of engineering solutions in global, economic, environmental, and societal contexts (SO_4).• Select and implement basic and advanced methods of
through problem definition, statement of human needs and developing design objectives. They learn how design progresses through various stages and how creative solutions are obtained. They are asked to list design short comings in daily use household devices. They learn to do marketing surveys and simple statistical analysis of consumer information and learn the role of ethics and professionalism in design.3. Simple Machines: A machine is a combination of resistant bodies properly designed and arranged to work together as a whole, so that certain predetermined objectives can be achieved and certain specific motions can be obtained. The simplest definition of a machine is it is a system in which some input is fed, and as a result
inclusion and diversity initiatives as well as employing innovative, ethical and inclusive mixed-methods research approaches to uncovering insights about the 21st century workforce. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Opportunities from Disruption -how lifelong learning can help create more connected classroomsAbstractThe coronavirus pandemic has led to instructors worldwide seeking ways to engage studentsbetter through virtual platforms. As the world interacts online, more than ever before, thispaper reflects on an educator’s experience with the virtual teaching and learning spaces pre andduring the ongoing
. Talbi, C. Kolski, and F. Hoogstoel, “Multi-Role Project (MRP): A New Project-Based Learning Method for STEM,” IEEE Transactions on Education, vol. 59, iss. 2, pp.137–146, 2016. [Online]. Available: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7219467.[7] G. Norman, and H. Schmidt, “The Psychological Basis of Problem-based Learning: A reviewof the Evidence,” Academic Medicine, vol. 67, no. 9, pp. 557–565, 1992.[8] E. Nuutila, S. Törmä, and L. Malmi, “PBL and Computer Programming - The Seven StepsMethod with Adaptations,” Computer Science Education, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 123–142, 2005.[Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1080/08993400500150788.[9] M. T. Simpson and N. D. Antill, Hands-On Ethical Hacking and Network Defense. 3rdEdition. Boston, MA
, Simpson A, Tamir D. Supplemental material for active perspective taking induces flexible use of self-knowledge during social inference. J Exp Psychol Gen. Published online 2016. doi:10.1037/xge0000237.supp33. Doherty TS, Carroll AE. Believing in overcoming cognitive biases. AMA J Ethics. 2020;22(9):773-778. www.journalofethics.org34. Franco GM, Muis KR, Kendeou P, Ranellucci J, Sampasivam L, Wang X. Examining the influences of epistemic beliefs and knowledge representations on cognitive processing and conceptual change when learning physics. Learn Instr. 2012;22(1):62-77. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2011.06.003
., engineering science) while largely ignoring the practical, social and behavioralinteractions that make up a significant part of engineering practice [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11].There is an increasing sense that science and engineering need to develop broader, moreinterdisciplinary perspectives to address the complex social problems facing the world today[12], [13], [14]. To become competent professionals, engineering graduates need to work acrossdisciplinary boundaries and engage more meaningfully and holistically with the social world andsocial systems that embed engineering such as the diverse international, societal, and communityinterests, as well as the various political, economic, legal, ethical and commercial interests inwhich engineers
andLearning Commons, highlighting the learning outcomes we discussed above, and then activelytrying to support the students through engaged learning.Labs StructureThere exist a total of seven weekly lab modules. Each lab introduces a set of related topics thatbuild upon the material from previous labs. The labs used to be two weeks in length, allowing forflexibility in fitting with the students’ personal schedules, but we discovered that the flexibilityactually motivated procrastination. Instead, to encourage a strong work ethic, we shifted to aweekly schedule. The labs are gamified so that the next lab will not unlock unless a studentcompletes the prior lab first. This incentivizes them to get something working, even if theirsolution is not