education. She has designed, developed and managed degree, and certificate programs, and has experience as an online instructor, and mentor and trainer of other online instructors.Thema Monroe-White, SageFox Consulting Group Thema Monroe-White is a senior evaluation and research consultant at SageFox Consulting Group. Thema worked as a researcher and evaluator in the areas of mental health, STEM education and commercializa- tion. She has taught in the K-12 environment, served as an instructor and invited guest lecturer for courses in leadership, statistics and cross-cultural psychology at the undergraduate and graduate levels. Thema completed her Master’s Degree in Developmental Psychology at Howard University and her
– foundations of teachingand learning. Tier 2: Scholarship – educational research and scholarly work in the field. Tier 3:Practice and Portfolio – reflective teaching portfolio development and peer mentoring.Tier 1 Content: Foundations of Teaching and Learning - Putting theory into practiceAreas of focus for this level of faculty development should include: Learning styles/Learning processes. Learning theory. Course and curriculum design. Constructive Alignment. Active learning (student engagement). Assessment and Evaluation. Teaching with Technology.Tier 2 Content: Scholarship:In this level participants become engaged in a largely self-directed process of developing,documenting, and exploring their own ‘mental model’ of
support their arguments on a particular case. Open-ended discussion and electronicdialogues have also been effective and beneficial because they stimulate debates while thestudents are exploring various ethical issues in their independent coursework.3 Electronicdialogues provide a forum to extend the debates beyond the regular class time.3Even though students have been exposed to the library research during their freshman designExperience, without intervention they tend to rely more on freely available web sites to obtainsupporting material for their assignments and debates. The Drexel Engineering Curriculum(tDEC) design program for freshman involves about 600 students in approximately 120 teamsworking on different design projects. While
Paper ID #38310Engaging Engineering Students through Environmental Data ScienceDr. Mary Kay Camarillo, University of the Pacific Dr. Mary Kay Camarillo is an Associate Professor of Civil Engineering at the University of the Pacific in Stockton, CA. She has a PhD in Civil & Environmental Engineering from the University of California, Davis and is a licensed Professional Engineer in California (Civil). Prior to working in academia, Dr. Ca- marillo worked in the consulting industry, designing and overseeing construction of water and wastewater infrastructure. Her research interests include environmental impacts of energy
graduation rates. Available at https://www.sariweb.ucdavis.edu/gradrates/CSRDE_Transfers_ForWebDisplay.pdf.[6] P. Golding, O.H. Salcedo, M.T. Pitcher, O.A. Perez, M. Olmos and T.Badillo, (2015) “Sharing Best Practices Toward Seamless Transfer of Engineering Students.” Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education’s 122nd Annual Conference and Exposition.[7] P. Wong and B. Pejcinovic, (2015) “Teaching MATLAB and C Programming in First-year Electrical Engineering Courses Using a Data Acquisition Device.” Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education’s 122nd Annual Conference and Exposition.[8] T.M. Bayles, (2016) “A Chemical Engineering Success Course for Transfer Students
assessment to improve teaching practice or student learning.But there are also significant differences between the issues facing K-12 and University faculty,primarily due to the nature of the established criteria for the two populations. Indicators of K-12content standards, aligned with teachers’ instructional objectives, specify very discrete skills andknowledge that students are expected to achieve at identified grade levels, with perceived weakor non-existing connections between them within a grade level or between grade levels.Acquisition of these skills and knowledge are usually measured through standardized state-wideassessments, which at best provides discrete aspects or chunks of student performance. This cancreate an apparent fragmentation
rate than their peers due to unwelcoming environments, and engineeringeducators should tackle issues like heteronormativity and cissexism in the learning environmentto promote diversity among future practicing engineers. The past year of the project has beenfocused on finishing data collection for the first research aim, investigating the influence ofLGBTQ students' social networks on non-cognitive STEM outcomes, and securing data accessagreements for the second research aim, comparing STEM degree completion rates betweenLGBTQ students and cisgender, heterosexual peers. For this poster, we focus on the process of developing a qualitative, narrative studyexploring how LGBTQ STEM students experience discipline-based identities. Our
adjacent to them more. With groups of only three students, this simple and powerful option is taken away from you. The two more dominant students will always be able to read each other's work easily. TIP: Don’t isolate female students. “Anne is in a group of four with John, Sarah and Kevin. However, today Sarah is absent. While working on the problem, John and Kevin talk mostly to each other, and Anne doesn’t feel like she is being heard, even when her teammates are pursuing an incorrect solution. Her frustration builds until she excuses herself from class.” The acceptable integers for the number of females in a group are 0, 2 and 3. The 1research indicates this is the best practice. My experiences leading a
programs accredited by ABET, Inc. He has advised more than 100 graduate students, including 26 Ph.D. students, and served as Principal or Co-principal investigator for more than $14 million of publicly and privately funded research. Russell is a respected researcher, author, and editor. He has published more than 200 technical papers in the areas of contractor failure, prequalification, surety bonds, constructability, automation, maintainability, warranties, and quality control/quality assurance. In addition, he has authored and published two books: Constructor Prequalification (1996) and Surety Bonds for Construction Contracts (2000). Russell served as Editor-in-Chief of the ASCE Journal of Manage- ment in Engineering
(education; engineering; public affairs; arts andsciences; food, agriculture, and environmental sciences; business; law). The OhioState EmPOWERment Program in convergent graduate training for a sustainableenergy future enrolls Ph.D. students studying any aspect of energy from degreeprograms any college in Ohio State and engages them in several curricular andco-curricular elements that are designed to dovetail with their Ph.D. degreeprogram requirements in ways that do not extend their time to graduate. TheOhio State EmPOWERment Program established at Ohio State an energy StudentCommunity of Practice and Engagement (SCOPE), a Graduate InterdisciplinarySpecialization (GIS), and an undergraduate Research in Sustainable Energy(RISE) summer research
Impacting Hispanic High School Students and How to Best Reach Them for the Careers in the Construction Industry," International Journal of Construction Education and Research , pp. 82-98, 2016.[6] D. F. Porter and A. N. Ofori-Boadu, "Examination of Future Construction Career Role Preferences and Identities," Salt Lake City, 2018.[7] D. C. Koch, "Experiences and Relationships that Influence Construction Management Students’ Career Choice," West Lafayette, 2007.[8] B. Park, "Student Perception of a Hybrid Learning Environment for a Lab-Based Construction Management Course," Associated Schools of Construction, Normal, 2011.[9] I. C. Osuizugbo, "Perception of Students as to Factors Affecting Academic Performance: A Case Study of M.Sc
areintended to inform faculty practice and understandings of systemic marginalization. Our primaryimplications will be for engineering education researchers of marginalization, to potentiallyincorporate our methodology to help create a more impactful and engaged research agenda. ProposalThis proposal is for an arts-based research and interactive poster session. Following therequested format of the interactive poster session particularly, we outline the following keyaspects of the proposal:Topic and Alignment with ECSJ Mission:The proposed interactive poster focuses on researcher and faculty roles regarding themarginalization of engineering students. First, we note that due to the efforts of many
buildings on 244 acres of sacred territory in Hempstead, NY housing 10 Schools offering 6 undergraduate degrees, 15 graduate degrees, and 3 professional degrees for a 62% female and 32% students of color student body.Sheridan College Experience 2011 to 2024Sheridan’s energy transition journey started in 2011, triggered by a growing recognition fromsenior financial and sustainability leadership that the college’s energy use, impacts, and costs couldbecome a much more strategic factor in the future than it had been in the past. Early on the decisionwas made to develop a comprehensive energy and climate master plan for the entire College.A multi-disciplinary Project Working Team (PWT) was formed comprised of all the disciplinesand
Paper ID #43480Board 247: ECE-WisCom: Enhancing Student Performance and Persistencethrough a Wisdom CommunityDr. Hilda Cecilia Contreras Aguirre, New Mexico State University Hilda Cecilia Contreras Aguirre, EdD is a STEM education researcher at New Mexico State University. She focuses her research on qualitative/mixed methods studies addressing minority and underrepresented student college performance and persistence through high-impact practices, particularly in STEM disciplines. Her main lines of inquiry examine best practices in mentoring and promotion of undergraduate research in STEM. She also collaborates with the
. Thisworkshop was attended by more than 70 academic and industrial professionals from around theworld. The main conversation topics included: required skillset for MRE graduates, the role ofindustry in shaping MRE education, the key components of MRE programs, and how to bestbalance theory and practice. The fruitful discussions and interactions during the workshopsparked the idea to create an online community where MRE educators can exchange ideas, sharecurricula and best practices, and continue the conversation.To this end, in March 2017, with support from one of the industrial partners, Quanser, two of theauthors (NL, VK) launched the Mechatronics Education Community [5]. The main websiteprovides an overview of community activities along with a Forum
education.References1 ABET. Criteria For Accrediting Engineering Programs. (2014).2 Phase, I. Educating the Engineer of 2020:: Adapting Engineering Education to the New Century. (National Academies Press, 2005).3 Ainsworth, S. in Visualization: Theory and practice in science education 191-208 (Springer, 2008).4 Miskioğlu, E. E. in Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 2016 IEEE. 1-7 (IEEE).5 Kolb, D. A. Learning styles and disciplinary differences. The modern American college, 232-255 (1981).6 Miskioğlu, E. E. Learning in Style: Investigation of Factors Impacting Student Success in Chemical Engineering at Individual and Team-Levels with a Focus on Student Learning Styles, The Ohio State University
displacement of marginalized communities to be the most impactful aspect of the assignment.Students also highlighted increased ethical awareness, practical applications of communityfeedback, and a broader perspective on engineering’s societal implications. This paper reflects onthe course design and early outcomes of the intervention, demonstrating how historicallygrounded assignments can foster greater awareness of DEI considerations among engineeringstudents. By equipping students with the skills to critically assess the societal implications ofengineering decisions, the intervention lays the groundwork for creating inclusive urbanenvironments. Future efforts should focus on institutional support and scaling such initiatives topromote a more
in 2009; Brazil in 2010; China in 2012; Costa Rica in 2013; New Zealand in 2014; Italyin 2015; and Chile in 2016. Over 280 students and seventeen different faculty members haveparticipated.This study abroad program was initially designed to address ABET General Criterion 3(h) whichnotes that graduates must have “the broad education necessary to understand the impact ofengineering solutions in a global, economic, environmental and societal context.” Specific ABETeducational outcomes for the program include: 1) the broad education necessary to understand theimpact of engineering solutions in a global and societal context, 2) recognition of the need for, andan ability to engage in, life-long learning, and 3) knowledge of contemporary issues
California, Los AngelesMr. Zachary Nelson, National InstrumentsMs. Manda Paul, University of California, Los Angeles Manda Paul received the B.S. degree in electrical engineering from University of California, Los Angeles, in 2010. She is continuing on to her masters in the field of circuits and embedded systems for wireless health applications.Mr. Stoytcho Marinov StoytchevJackson Tek Kon Ding, Marvell Technology Group, Ltd. Jackson Tek Kon Ding graduated summa cum laude in 2011 from UCLA with a bachelor’s of science degree in electrical engineering. He is currently an Analog Design Engineer at Marvell Technology Group, Ltd
Associate Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering at The Citadel: The Military College of South Carolina. He acquired a Bachelor’s in Engineering Physics Summa Cum Laude with Honors followed by Civil Engineering Master’s and Doctoral degrees from Texas Tech University. His technical research focuses on structural evaluation of buried bridges and culverts. He encourages students through an infectious enthusiasm for engineering mechanics and self-directed, lifelong learning. He aims to recover the benefits of the classical model for civil engineering education through an emphasis on reading and other autodidactic practices. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 A Review of
the case, there isa difference of opinion concerning exactly what constitutes this set of TQM best practices.Goetsch and Davis5 (2003) consider TQM best practices to be customer service, quality control,new product development, innovation, planning, continual improvement, teamwork, andtraining. A different approach to determine the best practices and critical success factors forTQM also involved using existing data. An extensive study of current literature listed as bestpractices “top management commitment and leadership, customer focus, information andanalysis, training, supplier management, strategic planning, employee involvement, humanresource management, process management, teamwork, product and service design, processcontrol
Texas at Brownsville. After graduation, he was employed at sev- eral corporations including Pixera, a digital multimedia processing company in Cupertino, CA, 3COM, a networking and communication company in Schaumberg, IL, and Mercantec, an E-Commerce company in Naperville, IL. He has more than 40 publications in the field, and has served as a reviewer/moderator for several scientific and educational journals and conferences. He joined UTB in the Spring of 2000. His areas of interest include Imaging, Visualization and Animation, Networking and Cyber Security, Web Design, Computer Graphics, and Linguistics.Prof. Fitratullah Khan, University of Texas - Rio Grande Valley Professor Fitratullah Khan has been teaching
.” The Chronicle of Higher Education, 22 Jan. 2009. 3. Errington, Edward. "The impact of teacher beliefs on flexible learning innovation: some practices and possibilities for academic developers," Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 41(1), (2004).4. McKenna, Ann F., Yalvac, Bugrahan, and Light, Gregory J. “The Role of Collaborative Reflection on Shaping Engineering Faculty Teaching Approaches,” Journal of Engineering Education, 98(1), 17-26 (2009) (and citations therein.)5. Kane, Ruth; Susan, Sandretto and Heath, Chris. "Telling Half the Story: A Critical Review of Research on the Teaching Beliefs and Practices of University Academics," Review of Educational Research, 72(2), 177-228 (2002
electrical energy from the reaction of hydrogenand oxygen. Each of the experiments lasts for two weeks.In Engineering Foundations, students are also introduced to a number of professional skills, suchas technical writing, communication, engineering ethics, and the engineering design process.Technical writing is covered by requiring the students to prepare laboratory reports for each ofthe four hands-on experiments. Communication is emphasized through a group presentation thatrequires the students to research one of the fourteen Grand Challenges9 identified by the NationalAcademy of Engineers and to present their findings to the class. Ethics is covered during alecture that uses practical examples and role playing to emphasize the challenges in
, Fiber Optic Communications, Technology and Society, and Project Management. He also advises students on their senior design projects. He is author of “The Telecommunications Fact Book, 2E” and co-author of “Technology and Society: Crossroads to the 21st Century,” “Technology and Society: A Bridge to the 21st Century,” and “Technology and Society: Issues for the 21st Century and Beyond.” He is a member of ASEE, and a senior member of IEEE.Amin Karim, DeVry University Amin Karim is the Director of Technology Programs at DeVry University. In this capacity, he is responsible for leading DeVry’s undergraduate and graduate programs in engineering technology, information systems, telecommunications
expert in structural design, analysis, and forensic engineering. Most recently, he created and installed the first off-campus graduate degree program, the multidisciplinary master’s of science in engineering, with Gulfstream in 2010. As Associate Dean, Ladesic is responsible for a variety of tasks related to increasing the role of industry in education and research, growing fac- ulty applied research, facilitating faculty industry experiences, developing and marketing industry-related graduate programs, and enabling industry-based research projects for students. This position enables the College of Engineering’s ability in research and professional development and enhanced participation in the Embry-Riddle Aerospace
Systems Engineering at the University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Her role in the College of Engineering at UNL is to lead the disciplinary-based education research ini- tiative, establishing a cadre of engineering education research faculty in the engineering departments and creating a graduate program. Her research focuses on the development, implementation, and assessment of modeling and design activities with authentic engineering contexts; the design and implementation of learning objective-based grading for transparent and fair assessment; and the integration of reflection to develop self-directed learners.Dr. Grace Panther, University of Nebraska, Lincoln Grace Panther is an Assistant Professor at the University of
Paper ID #10355Enhancing the STEM Curriculum Through a Multidisciplinary Approachthat Integrates Biology and EngineeringProf. Jennifer Vernengo, Rowan University Jennifer Vernengo is an Assistant Professor of Chemical Engineering at Rowan University. Jennifer re- ceived her Ph.D. from Drexel University in 2007. She began work as a materials scientist at Synthes Bio- materials, then joined Drexel University College of Medicine as postdoc in 2009. Jennifer two published research papers and one patent in the area of injectable biomaterials for orthopedic tissue replacement and repair. She is particularly interested in
SolidWorks every year. Instead, the instructor assigned an “e-text” (SolidProfessor)for the course. This research explores using commercially-produced content to teach thesoftware program portion of a computer-aided design course.Research QuestionsOne goal of the new mechanical engineering program is to identify best practices throughassessment of the courses and program. Another goal of the faculty is to ensure the studentshave a positive experience in each course. After every semester, student evaluations are assessedfor trends and opportunities to improve the course. Most recently for this course, the instructorswanted to gage the students’ opinions regarding the hybrid classroom approach and evaluate howit impacted their learning. Results of an
critically examining these areas, she aims to illuminate adverse, systemic impacts of policies and practices on historically marginalized populations at the organizational level. Current research projects include a scoping review of service learning courses, measuring sense of belonging in electrical and computer engineering, and a qualitative study of boundary-spanning educators. She has contributed to manuscripts about STEM graduate student funding, skill development, and recruitment in the International Journal of STEM Education and the Journal of Higher Education. She has also written education finance policy analyses for the Journal of Education Finance and published a document analysis in the Journal of Education Human