undergraduate engineering education have been studied by ajoint research group spanning University of San Diego, Purdue University, Clemson University,and Research Triangle Educational Consultants. A summary of these works is discussed here andare also referenced in the Results section alongside quotes from the interview with S34.Main et al. suggest a research design focused on studying veteran integration and transition intoundergraduate engineering as a basis for in-depth semi-structured interviews with studentveterans [17]. A 2019 paper by the same group reviews and analyzes 12 of the interviewsconsidering leadership as the primary framework [18]. Further, a 2021 paper examined thestudent veterans’ perspectives of transition from military to
participation in engineering. Dr. Abraham is a member of the IEEE and ASEE, and she serves in leadership roles within both organizations. She also serves on the board of the Inclusive Engineering Consortium (IEC). Dr. Abraham received the B.E. degree in Telecommunication Engineering from Visveswaraiah Technological University (VTU), India in 2007 and Ph.D. from Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA in 2012.Dr. Mehmet Vurkac, Seattle University Mehmet Vurkac is an assistant professor in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Seattle University.Dr. Agnieszka Miguel, Seattle University Dr. Miguel is Professor and Department Chair of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Seattle University. Dr. Miguel
and support tools, such as CATME and Tandem, is essential in monitoring andimproving student teamwork experience through insight obtained from various analyses [5], [6]. This study leverages data from an institutional database and Tandem. Tandem is a tooldesigned for assessing team dynamics and providing formative feedback. Since Tandem’s firstimplementation in 2019, it has collected responses from more than 13,000 students. For thisstudy, only data from the “beginning-of-term” survey (BoT) in Tandem and the responses to onequestion in the Midterm survey were studied. In this study, we explored patterns and types ofpre-semester concerns reported by first-year engineering students, investigating the followingfour research questions (RQs
Courses Paper presented at 2012 ASEE AnnualConference & Exposition, San Antonio, Texas. 10.18260/1-2—21760[6] Hite, K. R., & Slimak, L. J., & Korakakis, D., & Ahern, T. C. (2019, June), An OnlineApproach to the Analog Electronics Laboratory Paper presented at 2019 ASEE AnnualConference & Exposition , Tampa, Florida. 10.18260/1-2--32081[7] R. Al-Nsour, R. Alkhasawneh and S. Alqudah, "Online Engineering Education: LaboratoriesDuring the Pandemic – A Case Study," 2022 Intermountain Engineering, Technology andComputing (IETC), Orem, UT, USA, 2022, pp. 1-4, doi: 10.1109/IETC54973.2022.9796691.[8] Wang, N., Lan, Q., Chen, X., Song, G., and Parsaei, H., 2020, Development of a RemoteLaboratory for Engineering Education, CRC Press
, SciTePress - Science and and Technology Publications, 2013.[11] I. Ashby and M. Exter, “‘What’s in it for me?’ A Look into First-year Students’ Perceptions of a Digital Badge System,” in 2015 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition Proceedings, ASEE Conferences, 2015.[12] G. Illescas, A. Alvarado, and J. Portillo, “Active, topic-centered learning,” in 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, ASEE Conferences, 2020.[13] Galileo.edu. https://www.galileo.edu/servicios/servicios-academicos/electronicos/ges/. (accessed Feb. 08, 2024).[14] D. Gibson, N. Ostashewski, K. Flintoff, S. Grant, and E. Knight, “Digital badges in education,” Educ. Inf. Technol., vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 403–410, 2015, doi: 10.1007/s10639- 013
Chair of Integrated Engineering at the University of San Diego. She received a BS from Cornell University in Materials Science and Electrical Engineering (EE) and MS and PhD in EE from Stanford University. Her research focuses on the study and promotion of equity in engineering including student pathways and inclusive teaching. She has won best paper awards from the Journal of Engineering Education, IEEE Transactions on Education, and Education Sciences. Dr. Lord is a Fellow of the IEEE and ASEE and received the 2018 IEEE Undergraduate Teaching Award. She is a coauthor of The Borderlands of Education: Latinas in Engineering. She is a co-Director of the National Effective Teaching Institute (NETI
Strategies (VTS) for promoting reflection in engineering education: Graduate Student Perceptions," in 2021 ASEE Annual Conference & Expo, Virtual, 2021.[18] R. Taraban, M. Iserman, J. Pittman, N. Yeo, R. Campbell, J. Kim and D. Reible, "Work in Progress: Assessment of Reflective Thinking in Graduate Engineering Students: Human and Machine Methods," in 2021 ASEE Annual Conference & Expo, Virtual, 2021.[19] S. Loka, D. Doshi, S. Kulkarni, P. Baldava and S. Adepu, "Effect of reflective thinking on academic performance among undergraduate dental students," J Education and Health Promotion, vol. 8, p. 184, 2019.[20] A. Housen, "Aesthetic thought, critical thinking and transfer," Arts Learning Research Journal, vol. 18, no
Extracurricular Programme," Frontiers in Education, Vol. 4. Frontiers Media SA, 2019.[11] M.A.G. Bacilio, The correlation between extracurricular activities and STEM focused education, Diss. California State University, Sacramento, 2021.[12] J. Song, D. E. Dow, G. G. Ma, and J. R. McCusker, "Girl Scouts STEM Day Program" presented at the 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference, Virtual Online, June 2020. Available: https://peer.asee.org/34708.[13] J. Song and G. G. Ma, "RAMP: Summer Bridge Program for Female High School Students" presented at the 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Salt Lake City, UT, USA, June 2018. Available: https://peer.asee.org/30913.[14] J. Song, G. G. Ma, and D. E. Dow, "STEM Program for Female Students
this collaborative work is to develop asystematic assessment method to measure how the experimental module is perceived by highschools. In subsequent iterations of the summer program, a pre-and post-module survey will beadministered to gauge the understanding of important fluid mechanics concepts such as pressuredrop, friction, flow rate, and others, as well as to assess the ability of the mini fluid flow moduleto have students considering ChE as one of their prospective majors in college. 1. JUSTIFICATIONChemical engineering (ChE) is among the first five engineering disciplines with the highestnumber of awarded bachelor’s degrees in the United States, with approximately 11,148 degreesas of 2019. This was the result of the approximately
respondents indicated a preference for online worksubmission and student work feedback. The online work submission and student work feedbackloop preference may be a result of their experiences during the pandemic and/or the use ofGoogle Classroom in their earlier education.References[1] Martin, T. “Review of Student Soft Skills Development Using the 5Ws/H ApproachResulting in a Realistic, Experiential, Applied, Active Learning and Teaching PedagogicalClassroom.” J. Behav. Appl. Manag. (2019). 19. Pp. 41–57.[2] Rodríguez-Jiménez, R.-M., Lara-Bercial, P.J., and Terrón-López, M.-J. “Training FreshmenEngineers as Managers to Develop Soft Skills: A Person-Centred Approach.” Sustainability.(2021). 13. 4921. Pp. 1-16. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13094921[3
engineering education scholarly communities Chinese Engineering African Diaspora Group Education Club Initiation of Origin Shortly after the 2019 Started in 2020 during the CoP ASEE conference, the mandatory stay-at-home orders first conference for prevalent in the US due to the the community Covid-19 pandemic facilitator Purpose The need to build a To serve as a virtual community to community to connect help members navigate their
analysis, and land-use management. He has also taught courses on Leadership, Tech Ethics, Sustainability and Conflict Resolution at Universities in Costa Rica, the United States, Honduras, and Mexico.Dr. Bryn Elizabeth Seabrook, University of Virginia Bryn Seabrook is an Assistant Professor in Science, Technology, and Society at the University of Virginia. She received her Bachelor of Arts in Humanities, Science and Environment with a minor in Vocal Performance in 2012, a Master of Science and Technolo ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 2024 ASEE Annual Conference Choreographing Virtue: The Role of Situatedness and Layering in
for the EIH program and evaluation activities were adapted from thepre-pandemic learning environment to the remote-learning environment instituted during thepandemic, allowing for comparison of outcomes before and during the pandemic.MethodsPrevious course adaptations around team science were made and tracked by the teaching teamduring each of three academic years (Y1: 2018–2019, Y2: 2019–2020, Y3: 2020–2021) [2].Impacts of adaptations on team functioning and outcomes were evaluated using semi-structuredsurveys (Appendix A) that were deployed to students in the program at the beginning and end ofeach academic year. All study activities were carried out in accordance with approved ethicalguidelines and were deemed exempt by the institutional
, University of Toronto Prof. Aimy Bazylak is the Canada Research Chair (Tier 1) in Clean Energy and Professor in the Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering at the U of T. In 2011, she was awarded the I.W. Smith Award from the Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering, and she received the Ontario Early Researcher Award in 2012. From 2015-2018, she served as the Director of the U of T Institute for Sustainable Energy. In 2015 she was named an Alexander Von Humboldt Fellow (Germany), and in 2019 she was named a Fellow of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers. In 2020 she was awarded the U of T McLean Award and was elected to the Royal Society of Canada College of New Scholars, Artists and Scientists
. Malmi et al., “How authors did it – a methodological analysis of recent engineering education research papers in the European Journal of Engineering Education,” Eur. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 171–189, Mar. 2018, doi: 10.1080/03043797.2016.1202905.[8] A. Goncher, A. Hingle, A. Johri, and J. Case, “The Role and Use of Theory in Engineering Education Research,” in International Handbook of Engineering Education Research, A. Johri, Ed., Taylor & Francis, 2023, pp. 137–155. doi: 10.4324/9781003287483.[9] Q. Liu, “A SNAPSHOT METHODOLOGICAL REVIEW OF JOURNAL ARTICLES IN ENGINEERING EDUCATION RESEARCH,” Proc. Can. Eng. Educ. Assoc. CEEA, Nov. 2019, doi: 10.24908/pceea.vi0.13795.[10] Y. Chetioui, H. Benlafqih, and H
help create a culture where students can learn, grow, socialize, andenhance their engineering identity.This paper shares the student research team’s journey through creating an interview protocol, seethe appendix for the complete protocol, conducting interviews, and performing an initialanalysis. The work-in-progress version of this paper attempts to engage with some of the workbeing done at ASEE by others interested in exploring makerspaces, retention, and the impact ofidentity formation on underrepresented student groups. For the final version after year two of thestudy, we expect to engage much more deeply with the broader literature on the subject. Whilethe recommendations are site specific to our university, we expect some of the
learner’s environment– microsystems, the mesosystem, exosystem, macrosystem, and chronosystem– are different not merely in scope or size. Figure 2: Shelton’s (2019) Conceptual Model of Ecological Systems Theory Note. Adapted from Shelton (2019) or this conference paper, we honed in on EST’s construct of microsystems and specifically howFIDR graduate students’ mesosystem-level microsystems impact their development. EST posits that individuals directly or indirectly participate in a variety of different microsystems, where a microsystem is a “pattern of activities, roles, and interpersonal relations experienced by developing people in given settings with particular
EngineeringAccreditation Commission’s inclusion of communication as a core learning outcome required for allengineering students has significantly motivated a collective focus on how to effectively teachcommunication skills within required engineering curriculum (ABET Engineering AccreditationCommission, 2007; Williams, 2001). A second driver for embedding communication skills across thecurriculum is the growing body of research on the school-to-work transition for early-careerengineers. Broadly, research on the school-to-work transition suggests that engineering graduatesface significant challenges with communication in the workplace and feel unprepared for professionalskills more broadly in engineering practice (Ford et al., 2019; Gewirtz et al., 2018; Howe et
: Detection of Cheating at Online Examinations Using Deep Learning Approach -- A Case Study.”[8] Bonilla, J. M., Valarezo, M. S., Villacrés, B. D., and Guerra, M. A., 2023, “Board 44A: Work in Progress: Unannounced Frequent Examinations to Contribute Student Learning and Building Academic Integrity,” 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.[9] Paucarina, S. E., Batallas, J. D., Guerra, M. A., and Guerra, V., 2023, “Board 44B: Work in Progress: TikTok Format Videos to Improve Communicating Science in Engineering Students,” 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.[10] Knight, M., and Cooper, R., 2019, “Taking on a New Grading System: The Interconnected Effects of Standards-Based Grading on Teaching
by methodological integrity check-ins[63] with the second author. This process provided a second interpretation of excerpts of thenarrative expressions and also motivated the inclusion of program-level documents as sources ofnarrative expression. The second and third authors audited the work by providing feedback on thedocumentation; this encouraged further interrogation of the journey maps, values statements, andfindings elicited from the data. ASEE Educational Research and Methods Division reviewers alsoaudited the draft paper and prompted a better distinction between major and minor values, amongother reconsiderations. The results follow.4.0 ResultsThe narrative approach to interviewing allowed participants to share and elaborate on
, “Taxonomy of Educational Objectives,” in Handbook: The Cognitive Domain, David McKay, New York, 1956.[8] M. Lande, “Roles for Take-Home Exams from the Perspective of Engineering Students and Instructors,” in 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2023. Available: https://peer.asee.org/44163.[9] J. Tao, and Z. Li, “A Case Study on Computerized Take-Home Testing: Benefits and Pitfalls,” International Journal of Technology in Teaching and Learning, 8(1):33–43, 2012. Available: https://sicet.org/main/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/ijttl-12-01-3_Tao.pdf.[10] L. Bengtsson, “Take-Home Exams in Higher Education: A Systematic Review,” Education Sciences, vol. 9, no. 4. MDPI AG, p. 267, Nov. 06, 2019. doi: 10.3390
Structure of Engineering Education,” In: Christensen, S., Didier, C., Jamison, A., Meganck, M., Mitcham, C., Newberry, B. (eds) International Perspectives on Engineering Education. Philosophy of Engineering and Technology, vol 20, Springer, Cham, 2015.[25] E.A. Cech, & H.M Sherick, “Depoliticization as a mechanism of gender inequality among engineering faculty,” In the Proceedings of the 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2019.[26] E.O. McGee, Black, brown, bruised: How racialized STEM education stifles innovation, Harvard Education Press, 2021.[27] M. Hernández-de-Menéndez, A. Vallejo Guevara, J.C. Tudón Martínez, D. Hernández Alcántara, & R. Morales-Menendez, “Active learning in engineering education
for boththe R&D industry through a synthetic biology & laboratory skills pathway and abiomanufacturing and bioprocess pathway. These interrelated projects have evolved over time andare currently progressing simultaneously; each semi-autonomous piece provides a vital feedstockto our larger vision of the regional bioeconomy. We illustrate how these pieces affect thedevelopment of the workforce in the infographic in Figure 1.Generating Interest and Entering the PipelineThe foundation of our efforts lies in a regional effort to develop scientific literacy aroundsynthetic biology and interest in biotechnology careers. This effort started in 2019 when allbiology teachers from the Dobbins-Bennett High School in Kingsport, Tennessee, and
M. D. Koretsky, “Toward professional practice: student learning opportunities through participation in engineering clubs,” European Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 906–922, Nov. 2019, doi: 10.1080/03043797.2018.1477119.[19] E. Michor and M. Koretsky, “Students’ Approaches to Studying through a Situative Lens,” Studies in Engineering Education, vol. 1, no. 1, p. 38, Nov. 2020, doi: 10.21061/see.3.[20] S. B. Nolen and M. D. Koretsky, “WIP: An Ecosystems Metaphor for Propagation,” in ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, Montreal, 2020.[21] L. S. Vygotsky, Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1978.[22] A. N. Leontiev, Problems of
Engineering Education Forum, Tecnológico de Monterrey, Mexico, October, 2023.[16] Strayhorn, Terrell, College Students’ Sense of Belonging: A Key to Educational Success forAll Students, 2nd edition, Routledge, 2019.[17] Rhee, J., & Johnson, C., & Oyamot, C. M. “Preliminary Findings Using Growth Mindsetand Belonging Interventions in a Freshman Engineering Class,” 2017 ASEE Annual Conference& Exposition, Columbus, Ohio. doi: 10.18260/1-2--28753, June, 2017.[18] Dortch, Deniece & Chirag Patel, “Black Undergraduate Women and Their Sense ofBelonging in STEM at Predominantly White Institutions,” NASPA Journal About Women inHigher Education, 10:2, 202-215, 2017, doi: 10.1080/19407882.2017.1331854[19] Rodriguez, S. L., & Blaney, J. M
. Values, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 42–72, 2014.[4] C. McCall, L. D. McNair, and D. R. Simmons, “Advancing from outsider to insider: A grounded theory of professional identity negotiation in undergraduate engineering,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 110, no. 2, pp. 393–413, 2021.[5] K. L. Meyers, M. W. Ohland, A. L. Pawley, S. E. Silliman, and K. A. Smith, “Factors relating to engineering identity,” Glob. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 14, no. 1, 2012.[6] Y. M. Xu and B. Gravel, “A case study: Making facilitates an engineering student’s (re)negotiation with her disciplinary relationships,” in 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Baltimore, Maryland, 2023.[7] A. Calabrese Barton, H. Kang, E. Tan, T. B. O’Neill, J. Bautista-Guerra, and C. Brecklin
emerging social networks explains academic failure and success,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 116, no. 3, p. 792, 2019, doi: 10.1073/pnas.1811388115.[19] Lin, “Evolution of civil engineering students’ friendship and learning networks,” Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, vol. 144, no. 4, 2018, doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000390.[20] J. Elliott, A. Minichiello, and J. Ellsworth, “Examining relationships between student interactions with peers and resources and performance in a large engineering course using social network analysis,” ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition. Virtual, 2020.[21] C. Bidart and J. Charbonneau, “How to generate personal
-accrediting-engineering-programs-2024-2025/[7] G. Altuger and C. Chassapis, “Work in progress — Preparing students for lifelong learning in a capstone design environment,” in 2010 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), Arlington, VA, USA: IEEE, Oct. 2010, pp. T2J-1-T2J-2. doi: 10.1109/FIE.2010.5673347.[8] K. Jaeger-Helton, B. Smyser, and H. McManus, “Capstone Prepares Engineers for the Real World, Right? ABET Outcomes and Student Perceptions,” in 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, Tampa, Florida: ASEE Conferences, Jun. 2019, p. 32496. doi: 10.18260/1-2--32496.[9] D. N. Mavris and O. J. Pinon, “An Overview of Design Challenges and Methods in Aerospace Engineering,” in Complex Systems Design &