opportunities that allow students to apply theirengineering design learning. Classroom meetings are typically devoted to hands-on team-basedactivities, which range from product dissections to designing products for various speculativescenarios. In addition to these in-class activities, student teams work together out-of-class on asemester project wherein they design a novel consumer product. In addition, the ME studentswere enrolled in a hands-on laboratory course focused on manufacturing processes (welding,machining, casting, etc.).At the time of second data collection, in the second semester of participants’ sophomore year,neither group was enrolled in design-related courses. Both sets of students were involved inengineering science courses (e.g
. (2009). "And Never the Two Shall Meet?: Student vs. Faculty Perceptions of Online Courses." Journal of Educational Computing Research 40(2): 171-182.15 Osborne, R.E. (2010) Personal communication, December 1, 2010.16 Gibbons, M. (2010). Resurgent Masters. ASEE Prism, 19(8), 22-3. Retrieved from Education Full Text database17 Grose, T. K. (2003). "Can Distance Education Be Unlocked?" ASEE Prism, 12(8): 18-23.18 Esche, S. K. (2006). "On the Integration of Remote Experimentation into Undergraduate Laboratories Technical Implementation." International Journal of Instructional Media, 33(1): 43- 53.19 Zhao, J. J., Alexander, M. W., Perreault, H., Waldman, L., & Truell, A.D. (2009
DevelopmentIn Fall 2007, the professional development (PD) received by all GTAs consisted of fourhours of training prior to the start of the semester. The full details of the training havebeen described by Zawojewski, Diefes-Dux and Bowman.12 Of particular interest to thispaper is that the GTAs spent some time solving the first MEA that they would implementin the laboratory setting. This included reading the MEA problem statement andanswering the individual questions. GTAs, working in teams of 3 or 4, came toconsensus on the three individual questions in a similar fashion to that of the first-yearengineering students. The faculty facilitator briefly went over their answers to thesequestions
addition to the students’attitudes towards the project. Although the materials cost about $100 for the initialimplementation of this project, many of the supplies were plentiful enough for use in futureprojects. Therefore, the cost per student over several semesters would be less than theapproximately five dollars per student expended here. The purpose of this paper is to share thisexperience with others who are seeking to create project based learning opportunities withoutusing specialized laboratory space and with limited financial investment.IntroductionAt Austin Community College in Austin, TX, the “Introduction to Engineering” course helpsstudents explore engineering through several different instructional styles, including groupprojects
first phases of the study (conducted during 2011),which addresses research questions one, two and four.1.1 Background of the Premier AwardThe Premier Award competition was instituted with two primary goals: to recognize and rewardthe efforts of faculty (and students) developing courseware and to provide an external measure ofthe quality of the courseware.14 The Premier Award was created as a program within theSynthesis Coalition, one of the NSF engineering education coalitions funded in the 1990’s,which focused on improving engineering education by designing, implementing and assessingapproaches to undergraduate engineering education that emphasized multidisciplinary synthesis,teamwork and communication, hands-on and laboratory experiences
, so it is not possible to compare with other research tools. We dopartially address the evaluation issues, because in our study, we allow users to use the toolanywhere anytime and for their own research rather than limit the study in the laboratories. Inthis way, we gained valuable insight on how we can improve iKNEER in the future to addressresearchers’ real needs.2. 4 Web Information Seeking and ResearchersIn library and information science, lots of literature exists on how researchers use libraries andhow libraries influence their research21,22. There are also studies on how people seek informationon the web23,24. For example, studies have examined the gender differences and age differencesin information seeking on the web25–28; other
laboratories.” Most engineering colleges also claimed to be leading institutions—leaders in innovation, discovery, and education.Creating and expanding knowledge, particularly through research, was emphasized by most ofthe universities. The vision of one college of engineering was “to produce new engineers as wellas discoveries and technologies focused on research to enhance the quality of life in the U.S. andbeyond,” while another college stated that it valued “knowledge creation and scholarship.”Although undergraduates are involved in research at many (if not all) of the universities includedin this study, none of the university websites specified if undergraduate students were expectedto participate in creating and expanding knowledge through
design.Dr. Patricia Brackin, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Patricia Brackin is a professor of M.E. at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology, where she teaches a vari- ety of design courses including capstone design. Her B.S. and M.S. are from the University of Tennessee in nuclear engineering and her Ph.D. is from Georgia Institute of Technology in M.E. Her industrial ex- perience includes Oak Ridge National Laboratories, Chicago Bridge and Iron, and Eli Lilly. She is a registered P.E.Dr. M. Javed Khan, Tuskegee University Javed Khan is professor and Head of the Aerospace Science Engineering Department at Tuskegee Uni- versity. He received his Ph.D. in aerospace engineering from Texas A&M, M.S. in aeronautical
learning among diverse students: 1, 11 2) the stallingof innovation in STEM education:15 and 3) the wide-spread reliance on lecture and thereceive/memorize cognitive demand as the primary instructional strategy.12 Thusalternative faculty development models are needed.From a NSF Division of Undergraduate Education (DUE) perspective, facultydevelopment has been a key component in the Transforming Undergraduate Education inSTEM (TUES) and Course, Curriculum and Laboratory Improvement (CCLI) Programssince the Solicitation has a component calling for projects devoted to developing facultyexpertise. Further, with many of the proposals focused on the curriculum development,faculty workshops play a major role in the dissemination plan. For a number of
out under that grant includedthe planning of a civil engineering curriculum with an infrastructure theme. As part of the plan-ning process for the new curriculum, the team of faculty members created a framework of the I2Iclass to be taken by sophomores. This class was intended to provide students with a better un-derstanding of the challenges to be faced in improving, securing, and maintaining the nationalinfrastructure. Part of the planned course included student evaluation of infrastructure compo-nents in local communities from direct observation.In 2008, three faculty members from the department were awarded an NSF Course, Curriculum,and Laboratory Improvement (CCLI) grant (DUE 0837530) to create and teach the I2I courseplanned under the
scheduled days. The courses selected for the study at the institution areidentified as i) a freshman design class teaching computer-aided design, ii) a sophomoreintroductory circuits laboratory, iii) a junior design class in controls and electronics, and iv) asenior capstone project class.On the day of the module delivery, the case study was first introduced to students through a shortpresentation by the instructor assigned to this role during which the one-page case study wasread aloud. It is also suggested to include a brief, relevant video clip of a key interview or newssegment on the subject to supplement the text. Whenever possible, contrasting viewpoints bydifferent stakeholders can also be expressed through the selection of video clips to
. It isestimated that approximately 200 students per semester will take this new design course.Two pilots of the new design course will be completed before the semester implementation inFall 2012. Assessment instruments of the pilots include assignment rubrics, focus groups,surveys, and questionnaires. This paper includes some of the preliminary data collection andresults and issues encountered by the development team.IntroductionThe Ohio State University (OSU) is a Research 1 land grant institution. Mechanical Engineeringat OSU has historically had a traditional curriculum with a hands-on design experience in thefirst year, theoretical and laboratory experiences in the second and third year, and a seniorcapstone in the fourth year.The
-systems that can be evaluated. In that case, the inputsand outputs of each sub-system will have to be determined to ensure compatibility andinteroperability.For this phase, standard testing processes, laboratory and experimental procedures, andinformation about appropriate simulation/modeling software could all be needed. In addition, oneneeds to learn about and understand the underlying theories that go into the models. This enablesthe team to determine whether a particular model is appropriate for the use case of the designproblem, and whether, for example, the results can be extrapolated from a model to the full scale.Additionally, the management of original data gathered during prototyping and testing needs to becarried out appropriately. As
laboratories. The primarylearning objectives of the course are based on criteria for graduating competent engineers asrecommended by the National Academy of Engineering (NAE)39 and ABET28. Four weeks of thesemester comprise general lectures that provide an overview of the engineering profession andinclude the topics of failure analysis, design methodology and human-centered design, societalcontext of engineering, as well as leadership and ethical considerations in engineering as adiscipline. Following the general lectures are two sets of five-week modules.For the semester in which this study took place, a five-week module on leadership was offered inaddition to two other modules focused on more traditional engineering topics, bioengineeringand
similarly developed a three course sequence providing an immersive, laboratory-basedexperience; the third course in this sequence focuses on the engineering design process andfollows the IDEO design process.13 At Rowan University, an engineering clinic course sequence(which is comprised of one course per term for all four academic years) provides immersivelaboratory based experiences for students across all engineering majors.14 The sophomore clinicbegins during the fall term with a disciplinary design experience and culminating during thespring term with multidisciplinary design experiences.14 Compared to the first four programsmentioned, the last four programs mentioned are smaller and offer an immersive, moreintegrated engineering design
&M course," Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, vol. 5, 2009.[6] H. Ebbinghaus, Memory: A Contribution to Experimental Psychology (translated). New York: Columbia Teachers' College, 1913.[7] C. D. Bailey, "Forgetting and the Learning Curve: A Laboratory Study," Management Science, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 340-352, 1989.[8] J.H. Block and P.W. Airasian, Mastery Learning: Theory and Practice.: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, 1971.[9] R. M. Thorndike and T. Thorndike-Christ, "Qualities Desired in Any Measurement Procedure: Reliability," in Measurement and Evaluation in Psychology and Education, 8th Ed. Boston: Pearson, 2010, pp. 124-125.[10] H. F. O'Neil and J. Schacter, "Test Specifications for Problem-Solving
, Montgomery, West Virginia.ABSTRACT An inexpensive hydrogen injection system was designed, constructed and testedin the Mechanical Engineering (ME) laboratory. It was used to supply hydrogen to agasoline engine to run the engine in varying proportions of hydrogen and gasoline. Afactory-built injection and control system, based on the injection technology from theracing industry, was used to inject gaseous hydrogen into a gasoline engine to boost theefficiency and reduce the amount of pollutants in the exhaust. A fully programmableNOS Launcher Progressive Nitrous Controller was used with the ability to controlinjection of a fuel based on engine performance parameters such as RPM and manifoldair pressure. The system was first tried out
experiments, interpret and analyze data, and report results. 4. Graduates will demonstrate the ability to design a mechanical system, component, or process that meets desired specifications and requirements. 5. Graduates will demonstrate the ability to function on engineering and science laboratory teams as well as on multidisciplinary design teams. 6. Graduates will use modern engineering software tools and equipment to analyze mechanical engineering problems. 7. Graduates will demonstrate an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility. 8. Graduates will be able to communicate effectively in both verbal and written forms. 9. Graduates will have the confidence for self-education and the ability for
University Ali Eydgahi started his career in higher education as a faculty member at the Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute in 1985. Since then, he has been with the State University of New York, University of Maryland, Eastern Shore, and Eastern Michigan University. During 2006-2010, he was Chair of the Department of Engineering and Aviation Sciences, Founder and Director of the Center for 3-D Visualization and Virtual Reality Applications, and Technical Director of the NASA funded MIST Space Vehicle Mission Planning Laboratory at the University of Maryland, Eastern Shore. In Aug. 2010, he joined Eastern Michigan University as an Associate Dean in the College of Technology and currently is a Professor in the School of
. Rodriguez has also served on various national technical committees and panels. He is currently serving on the fol- lowing National Academies panels: Survivability and Lethality Analysis and Army Research Laboratory (ARL) Autonomous Systems. Personal website: http://aar.faculty.asu.edu/.Ms. Anita Grierson, Arizona State University Anita Grierson has been the Director of the METS Center in the Ira A. Fulton School of Engineering at ASU since 2008. Grierson has more than 10 years corporate experience in program management, business development, and biomechanical engineering, with products as diverse as air bag systems for helicopters, body armor, and orthopedic implants. She received her bachelor’s degree in mechanical
., Sheppard, S. D., Johnson, D. W. & Johnson, R. T. Pedagogies of Engagement: Classroom- Based Practices. Jnl. Eng. Ed. 94, 87–101 (2005).3. Kilpatrick, D. J., Linville, M. & Stout, D. E. Procedural justice and the development and use of peer evaluations in business and accounting classes. Journal of Accounting Education 19, 225–246 (2001).4. Byrd, J. S. & Hudgins, J. L. Teaming in the Design Laboratory. Jnl. Eng. Ed. 84, 335–341 (1995).5. Eschenbach, E. A. & Mesmer, M. A. Web Based Forms for Design Team Peer Evaluations. Proceedings of the 1998 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition (1998).at 6. Wang, J. & Imbrie, P. K. Assessing Team Effectiveness: Comparing Peer-Evaluations to a Team Effectiveness
regarding the necessity of ViTAS application is discussed in previoussections.Iteration -1: initial planning of ViTASIn the initial planning of the ViTAS application development, few important aspects isconsidered such as set up the development environment (research laboratory), hire theappropriate personnel (graduate assistants), buy the necessary equipments (computers, servers,printers, etc.), use of software packages (MS Visual Studio 2010, SQL server 2008 R2, MSTeam Foundation Server, etc.), and network connections to the servers. The workstations andserver connection network is designed and setup to initialize the development process shown inFigure 3. After the work stations are setup, all the necessary tools are installed in the workstations
es- tablished the Mobile Integrated Solutions Laboratory (MISL), a joint university-industry partnership fo- cusing on the design and development of hardware and software products Morgan served 22 years in the Air Force, including a tour of duty on faculty with the Electrical Engineering Department at the U.S. Air Force Academy.Dr. Jay R. Porter, Texas A&M University Jay R. Porter joined the Department of Engineering Technology and Industrial Distribution at Texas A&M University in 1998 and is currently the Program Director for the Electronics and Telecommunications programs. He received a B.S. degree in electrical engineering (1987), a M.S. degree in physics (1989), and a Ph.D. in electrical
AC 2012-4481: EDUCATION APPROACH IN JAPAN FOR MANAGEMENTAND ENGINEERING OF SYSTEMSProf. David S. Cochran, Southern Methodist University and Meijo University David Cochran is a professor of industrial and systems engineering management. He is Founder and Prin- cipal of System Design, LLC, Visiting Professor with the School of Business, Meijo University, Nagoya, Japan and faculty of systems engineering, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, Texas. Cochran devel- oped the Manufacturing System Design Decomposition (MSDD) to determine the underlying design of the Toyota Production System (and ”lean”) from a systems engineering viewpoint and was Founder and Director of the Production System Design Laboratory in the
the searchfirst students as their questions are answered within a context. Likewise, the search first studentsperform better than ask first students as they are engaged in the learning process and are self-directing their learning. Finally, ask first students are merely seeking an answer without anyexploration.Virtual Office HoursStatus updates and comments are asynchronous forms of communication and require participantsto wait indefinitely for responses from others in the network. There are many instances whereimmediate feedback is necessary in order for students to proceed on a project or other learningactivity. In the inverted classroom model, that immediate feedback occurs in the laboratory,although there are other instances where
Program in the Engineering Education Innovation Center has anumber of physical simulation laboratories that have been designed to provide first yearengineering students with a hands-on experience with a variety of engineering principles andmethods. One such lab was casually called the ‘Camera Lab’ as it involved the assembly of adisposable Kodak Camera.The learning constructs in this lab primarily revolved around push versus pull type productionand inventory management systems with a single product variant. In short the learningconstructs were somewhat narrow and limited albeit useful. The leadership of the First-yearEngineering Program desired to update and expand this lab.An Integrated Systems Engineering faculty member intimately knowledgeable
presentation. Many ofthe teams spend additional time at the organization’s site collecting data, volunteering, orobserving the operation of a facility to get a better understanding of the design problem. Theinteraction with the client, on average, could be described as short term, and low (i.e. notimmersive). While the resources committed are substantial, in fact an analysis has shown thatthe cost of this course is approximately equivalent to a laboratory course for the same number ofstudents. It was designed to be cost neutral, and has successfully been run this way for severalyears now.Using the model, we can compare and contrast the WPI program and the UofT program. WPI isclearly a more immersive program that stretches across multiple years and
AC 2012-4792: ADVANCING PERSONALIZED ENGINEERING LEARN-ING VIA AN ADAPTIVE CONCEPT MAPDr. Christopher B. Williams, Virginia TechMr. Jacob Preston Moore, Virginia Tech Jacob Moore is a Ph.D. candidate in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech.Dr. Aditya Johri, Virginia TechDr. Robert Scott Pierce, Sweet Briar CollegeChris North, Virginia Tech Chris North is an Associate Professor of computer science at Virginia Tech. He leads the Information Visualization research group in the Center for Human-Computer Interaction, and directs the GigaPixel Display Laboratory, one of the most advanced display and interaction facilities in the world. He was General Chair of the IEEE Information Visualization (InfoVis
“catch up” to the competition. Investing in the future has always been a challenge we have faced and conquered in the United States as we continuously move forward with innovative ways to teach math and science such that young students will embrace the excitement of laboratory and other hand-on teaching methods in math and science; leading to their interest and pursuit of engineering as a career in the future. This paper will not discuss STEM Education or the many efforts being invested in to grow our engineers and scientist base of the future; rather it will present a solution to how one company manages to provide a cohesive and inclusive “development programs” structure including opportunities available during the engineering student’s
Engineering and Com- puter Science at the University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee (UWM) since 1983. Currently he is professor and Chairman of the Computer Science Program. Hosseini’s expertise is in the areas of computer net- works, computer architecture, fault-tolerance, and distributed and parallel computing. He is the Founder and Co-director of the Computer Networks Laboratory at UWM. Hosseini has published more than 120 research papers in refereed journals and conference proceedings. One of his co-authored papers has won the Best Paper Award, and he has published two book chapters. He is the recipient of a patent in the field of computer networks. He has supervised nine Ph.D. and more than 60 M.S. students and has re