. Welch, "Veteran students in engineering leadership roles," in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Columbus, OH, 2017: ASEE.[42] D. B. Stringer and M. McFarland, "Veterans’ contributions to enhancing the capstone learning experience of engineering cohorts," in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, New Orleans, LA, 2016.[43] T. L. Davis, D. B. Stringer, and M. R. Mcfarland, "Integrating veteran experiences into engineering design: Veteran-led student development of High-power Rocket Competition team," in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Salt Lake City, UT, 2018.[44] N. Salzman, T. B. Welch, H. Subbaraman, and C. H. G. Wright, "Using veterans’ technical skills in an engineering laboratory
advocates for Scholars’ academic andcareer success. Activities included tutorial and writing assistance, undergraduate researchopportunities, visitations to research laboratories and graduate schools, attendance and/orparticipation in research conferences, professional career counseling, and work experiences. Amore detailed list of services and those responsible for the particular service is given in Table III. FIG. 1: SCHOLARSHIP APPLICATION FORM Purdue University Northwest (Calumet) NSF S-STEM Scholarship Program Scholarship Application FormName: ________________________________ Advisor:_____________________________Major
laboratory; an expert in thepractical application of a science; a person skilled in the technique of an art or craft [3]. For thisstudy technician is defined as a person with the direct, applied, hands-on skills, and knowledge ata highly "vocational" or "craftsman" level. The technician may have vocational certifications andpossibly a two-year college degree.Engineering technologist per the American Heritage Dictionary is “a person who uses scientificknowledge to solve practical problems [4]. According to ABET “... engineering technologyprograms stress current industrial design practices that allow students to start developingpractical workplace skills [5].” For this study the technologist is defined as a person with someeducation or training in
Influence in Robotics Engineering Activity,” J. Learn. Sci., vol. 23, no. 4, 2014.[10] B. Latour and S. Woolgar, Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1986.[11] J. L. Lemke, Talking Science: Language, Learning, and Values. Norwood, NJ: 1990, 1990.[12] J. Bransford, “Preparing People for Rapidly Changing Environments,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. January 20, pp. 1–3, 2007.[13] S. A. Kirch, “Identifying and resolving uncertainty as a mediated action in science: A comparative analysis of the cultural tools used by scientists and elementary science students at work,” Sci. Educ., vol. 94, pp. 308–335, 2010.[14] J. Roschelle, “Learning by collaboration: Convergent conceptual
needs of the workshop (regular classroom,laboratory, computer lab or open space).The conference hosts more than 25 different workshops each year. Every workshop has acapacity of 25 attendees. When the room is at full capacity, the presenters close the door andplace a sign "Session FULL”. In this way, attendees migrate from overcrowded sessions to otherworkshops with few attendees. The goal is that all of the presenters have the opportunity topresent in a real setting with an audience.At the conference, the presenters deliver their workshop twice; once each in the morning andafternoon session. After each session, the presenters will distribute an anonymous evaluationform. This evaluation includes the basic information of the attendee (age and
refer to the mother as Mom and have given the pseudonym John to the child.Design Activity: Design a RollercoasterThe family was asked to try out an engineering design activity in which they had to design andbuild a rollercoaster for an amusement park. The activity was done in an out-of-school setting ina laboratory of a research institution. In this activity, the family received two letters from thedirector of a hypothetical amusement park. The first letter stated the problem of a need to have aroller-coaster in the park. It introduced the context of the problem and provided instructionsabout the next steps. The second letter specified criteria and constraints of the problem. Thefamily had to use a construction kit (Figure 1) to build their
Paper ID #26097Lessons Learned from Available Parsons Puzzles SoftwareDr. Alessio Gaspar, University of South Florida Dr. Alessio Gaspar is an Associate Professor with the University of South Florida’s Department of Com- puter Science & Engineering and director of the USF Computing Education Research & Evolutionary Algorithm Laboratory. He received his Ph.D. in computer science in 2000 from the University of Nice Sophia-Antipolis (France). Before joining USF, he worked as visiting professor at the ESSI polytechnic and EIVL engineering schools (France) then as postdoctoral researcher at the University of Fribourg’s
addition to clubs and organizationsd Includes personal travel, personal interests (e.g., songwriting), and personal initiatives (e.g., self-started business)e Total number of times that participants used particular learning experiences to demonstrate competency across the five areas 910 This (co-curricular laboratory) experience altered my view of the research industry. I was enamored and became aware that research is an ongoing process, and some dedicate their entire lives and career to such specific topics… Breaking down and troubleshooting problems…was a significant part of my learning experience. I gained unique technical
instructional anatomy videos: Student usage, self‐ efficacy, and performance in upper limb regional anatomy assessment,” American Association of Anatomists, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 461-470, December 2017. [Online]. Available doi: 10.1002/ase.1756.[5] V. Saxena, P. Natrarajan, P. O’Suillivan, and S. Jain, “Effect of the use of instructional anatomy videos on student performance,” Anatomical Sciences Education, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 159-165, July 2008. [Online]. Available doi: 10.1002/ase.38.[6] M.C. Box et al., “Qualitative and quantitative evaluation of three types of student- generated videos as instructional support in organic chemistry laboratories,” Journal of Chemical Education, vol. 94, no. 2, pp. 164-170, January
produce computer-based models at theexpense of physical models. This fact is behind a general trend of teaching applied engineeringsubjects with minimal students’ involvement with physical set-ups including: laboratoryexperiments. Carrying out laboratory experiments and generating experimental data, visiting aproject site, and using pencil and paper to produce a schematic, are gradually fading away. Thesetraditional tools were instrumental in developing an engineering common sense. It is argued herethat generating data from physical models is potentially a great learning tool, particularly whenthe model is built by the students. Building a model, testing a model, generating physical datafrom the model, and analyzing said data, help students
, laboratory skills, data analysis and reduction skills, writing skills, presentation skills, etc.) should be willing to pass it on, and/ or share it with their group members; Collaborative skills- Groups cannot function effectively if members do not have (be willing to learn) or use some needed social skills. Such as: leadership, decision-making, trust building, and conflict management; Monitoring progress- Groups need to discuss amongst themselves whether they are achieving their set goals. They need also to prioritize the scheduled activities, introduce changes when needed, and solicit advice and assistance with the consent of the instructor.Success in implementing active learning, including
South Florida Dr. Alessio Gaspar is an Associate Professor with the University of South Florida’s Department of Com- puter Science & Engineering and director of the USF Computing Education Research & Evolutionary Algorithm Laboratory. He received his Ph.D. in computer science in 2000 from the University of Nice Sophia-Antipolis (France). Before joining USF, he worked as visiting professor at the ESSI polytechnic and EIVL engineering schools (France) then as postdoctoral researcher at the University of Fribourg’s Computer Science department (Switzerland). Dr. Gaspar is an ACM SIGCSE, SIGITE and SIGEVO member and regularly serves as reviewer for international journals & conferences and as panelist for
Engineering.” Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 101, No. 2, pp, 319-345 2. Lichtenstein, G. , McCormick, A. C., Sheppard, S. D. and Puma, J, “Comparing the Undergraduate Experience of Engineers to All Other Majors: Significant Differences are Programmatic.” Journal of Engineering Education, 99: 305-317, October 2010. 3. Felder and R. Brent, “Why Students Fail Tests: 1. Ineffective Studying.” Chem. Engr. Education, 50(2), 151-152 (Spring 2016). 4. Newcomb and Bagwell, “Collaborative Learning in an Introduction to Psychological Science Laboratory: Undergraduate Teaching Fellows Teach to Learn.” Teaching of Psychology, April 1997, Vol. 24(2), pp. 88-95. 5. V. Tinto, “Taking Retention Seriously: Rethinking the
problems in a timely andcost-effective fashion, with focus on safety, quality, and environmental impacts. Formaleducation experiences included construction courses, professors, peers, laboratory projects,designing, sketching, site observation projects, Building Information Modelling (BIM), class andvolunteer experience, and student organizations. Through these experiences, students gainedknowledge and understanding of the principles and practices that guide the successfuldevelopment of construction projects. The strong links between formal education and industrialexperience opportunities contributed to students’ competencies, performance, and self-efficacy.Virtual experiences: Respondents indicated that virtual experiences that influenced their
students still do not yet experience full access to information inpostsecondary education that is equal to that of their hearing peers. Many existing anddeveloping technologies have significant potential to serve as effective “access technologies” forDHH people.Access technologies refer to technologies or devices that can be utilized by DHH students toassist them in acquiring or sharing information, communicating, or otherwise participating ineducational opportunities, including classroom, online learning, and laboratory experiences, aswell as educational experiences taking place outside of the classroom. To address the uniquechallenges of utilizing or adapting new technologies for use in postsecondary educationalsettings, Rochester Institute of
monitoring methods Identify, formulate and solve an appropriate queueing model that applies IE4520 Stochastic Modeling to a given queueing system Formulate and solve problems using dynamic programming Carry out background research IE4522 Human-Machine Systems Conduct laboratory experiments in human response and performance, Interpret results statistically, use findings to design human-asset systems Apply concept of supply chain management IE4525
boundary conditions for slip flows must be reviewed. Streamlines and equipotentiallines lead to development of curvilinear grid systems which are commonly used later in CFDsoftware. At the undergraduate level, creating some models of wind tunnel applications on thecomputer is very interesting for students. Our current laboratory exposure also offers application-oriented demonstrations for wave equations, shock-tubes, etc. Overall clarity in understandingmathematical depth acts as a big motivator for students at upper undergraduate levels (seestudent comments in Appendix C).Appendix BThe opportunity to relearn missed concepts for a better grade is a very powerful motivator. Thefollowing instructional style was adopted a few days from the beginning
learners to get involvedwith the actual process of work through a 3D simulation without being in danger. Users willhave a better understanding of storm drainage systems, which will help to prevent possibleincidents due the lack of knowledge. The next stage of research will involve a survey to obtainusers’ feedback concerning the utility of this tool by the users (trainees) and the migration ofthese 3D models into augmented reality and virtual reality environments. As the related researchprogresses, additional information and guidance will be presented in the future.AcknowledgmentsThe authors wish to acknowledge the reviewers for their comments that have greatly enhancedthis paper. Thanks also go to members of the Construction Laboratory for
Paper ID #24784Concept Maps as an Assessment Tool for Evaluating Students’ Perception ofEntrepreneurial Mind-setMs. Marissa Mary Martine, Rowan University Marissa Martine is a sophomore Chemical Engineering major with a concentration in Honors Students and Material Science at Rowan University. She is also involved with the American Institute of Chemical Engineers and the Society of Women Engineers, and involved in research at the Sustainable Materials Research Laboratory at Rowan University.Lia X. Mahoney, Rowan University She is a student at Rowan University for Mechanical Engineering with an strong interest in
the project, the instructor began searching for prospective students. It was envisionedthat the project would offer a learning platform to students allowing them to generate novelmethods of applying energy conversion, while providing a practical result to the client.The laboratory background of this project was a 1/3 scale 1960’s style Ford Model T built byMcCullough Co, changed to Toro Co, then to Sharp Mini Cars. The charge given by the clientwas to convert the vehicle’s prime mover from gasoline to electrical using the design criteriaoutlined below:Hard Project Requirements • Retain original controls for Front, Neutral, and Reverse [F-N-R] using a lever on the left- hand side [LH] and the throttle which was a lever on right side of
see how toimprove the set of questions.The third stage is question prioritization. The instructor should provide some criterion or set ofcriteria on which to prioritize the questions. Some options include propensity for exploration,relevance to the topic, importance to the topic, question complexity, or level of student interest.The criteria selected by the instructor should be related to the desired purpose for which thequestions will be used. Some options for the purpose of the generated questions include aresearch paper, design project introduction, laboratory hook, or topic motivation [13].3. Datasets and Proposed ApproachThe QFT data from five labs of the EC course are questions provided in response to a thought-provoking topic expressed
their support with the changes to the curriculum. Additionally,we are grateful to our scheduling office and laboratory managers who helped with organizationalaspects of running the course. Thank you, also, to Michael McCarthy and Derek Dunn-Rankinfor providing guidance on the history of MAE projects. Finally, thank you to the two anonymousreviewers for their helpful comments and feedback.ReferencesAdams, R. S., Turns, J., & Atman, C. J. (2003). Educating effective engineering designers: Therole of reflective practice. Design studies, 24(3), 275-294.American Association for the Advancement of Science [AAAS]. (2001). Atlas of science literacy.Washington, DC: National Science Teachers Association.Archer, L. B. (1965). Systematic method for
university-level physical chemistry class,” Chem Educ Res Pr., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 81–94, 2013.[21] M. J. Ford and E. A. Forman, “Redefining Disciplinary Learning in Classroom Contexts,” Rev. Res. Educ., vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 1–32, Jan. 2006.[22] M. D. Koretsky, E. Nefcy, S. B. Nolen, and A. B. Champagne, " Affordances of computer and physical laboratory-based design projects for engaging student teams in engineering practice," Cogn Instr, 2009.[23] K. A. Smith, “Cooperative learning: effective teamwork for engineering classrooms,” in Proceedings Frontiers in Education 1995 25th Annual Conference. Engineering Education for the 21st Century, 1995, vol. 1, pp. 2b5.13-2b5.18 vol.1.[24] D. L. Schwartz, C. C. Chase, and J. D
. He serves as Faculty Advisor for the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Student Chapter at LTU, chair of the First Year Engineering Experience committee, chair for the LTU KEEN Course Modification Team, chair for the LTU Leadership Curriculum Committee, supervisor of the LTU Thermo-Fluids Laboratory, coordinator of the Certificate/Minor in Aeronautical Engineering, and faculty advisor of the LTU SAE Aero Design Team. Dr. Gerhart conducts workshops on active, collaborative, and problem-based learning, entrepreneurial mindset education, creative problem solving, and innovation. He is an author of a fluid mechanics textbook.Dr. Robert W. Fletcher, Lawrence Technological University Robert Fletcher
provided withthe help of hands-on laboratory experiments. The course is divided into lecture and hand-on labs.The topics included covered in lecture are engineering design process, problem solving, technicalcommunication, engineering ethics and teamwork. Utilizing engineering tools to analyze dataand solve real world problems is an important aspect of the course. Analyzing data in MicrosoftExcel, Programming in MATLAB and Design Project are three major areas of the lecturecomponents of the course. Data analysis concepts involve creation of arrays, use of arithmeticoperators, use of built-in functions, graphing techniques for single or multiple datasets inMicrosoft Excel. An Alternative approach to data analysis is presented using MATLABprogramming
Paper ID #25926Engineering Design Applications in the Introduction to Mechanical Engineer-ing CurriculumMr. Johnathon Demetrio Garcia, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology Johnathon Garcia is a senior in the Mechanical Engineering Department at New Mexico Institute of Min- ing and Technology (NMT). In addition to his bachelor’s degree he is seeking graduate studies at NMT. He has conducted research under Dr. O’Malley with cooperation with Sandia National Laboratories on designing low cost, compact data acquisition systems for rockets. These systems were required to perform on a par with far more expensive, larger
Engineering, Proceedings of the International Conference, 2010, vol. 30, p. 305.[39] H. S. Tan, “Learning and motivational aspects of using interactive digital media (IDM),” Motiv. Pract. Classr., pp. 315–340, 2008.[40] M. Menekse, R. Higashi, C. D. Schunn, and E. Baehr, “The role of robotics teams’ collaboration quality on team performance in a robotics tournament,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 106, no. 4, pp. 564–584, 2017.[41] J. B. Weinberg, W. W. White, C. Karacal, G. Engel, and A.-P. Hu, “Multidisciplinary teamwork in a robotics course,” in ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 2005, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 446– 450.[42] B. Balamuralithara and P. C. Woods, “Virtual laboratories in engineering education: The simulation lab and
demonstrations are designed to engage students ofsenior level Control Systems Design course in actual engineering problems to develop theirpractical engineering skills and to enhance students’ connection with junior level courses such asmicrocontroller programming. By utilizing the available resources within the College ofEngineering at CSU Chico, multiple projects were developed for the Control Systems Designcourse. These projects benefited from existing laboratory spaces and equipment, which includeda wind tunnel and a solar photovoltaic array at the Energy Systems Lab and a water flume at theFluid and Mechanics Lab. The control systems were implemented using either theTM4C123GH6PM, the Tiva™ C Series microprocessor, which students use in the two
I learned a lot about courses such as Technical Communication, andMechanical Laboratory. Then there was one course for Virtual Reality. These are thecourses that I never took even in my bachelor’s degree or my master’s degree.” -- PamelaCultural knowledgeWithin the knowledge domain, cultural knowledge was mentioned by every student.Take Phillip as an example, due to participating in Chinese festivals, he learned abouttraditional Chinese culture, which helped him to respect others and some rituals.“Oh, I have learned about Chinese culture. Yeah, I stayed with my professor inJiangshan. Yeah, he brought me in a Chinese New Year. So it was really the bestexperience of
operator theory, as well as academic integrity in international engineering education.Prof. Chengbin Ma, University of Michigan–Shanghai Jiao Tong University Joint Institute Professor Chengbin Ma received the B.S. degree in industrial automation from East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai, China, in 1997, and the M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in electrical engi- neering from The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan, in 2001 and 2004, respectively. From 2004 to 2006, he was an R&D Researcher with the Servo Motor Laboratory, FANUC Limited, Japan. Between 2006 and 2008, he was a Postdoctoral Researcher with the Department of Mechanical and Aeronautical Engi- neering, University of California, Davis, USA. He