insight on all aspectsof the process and what considerations are necessary when considering the six pillars, as well whataspects of were left out. Third, the assessment of students values using the 4 human values [16], • biospheric (i.e., concern for environment): self-transcendence • altruistic (i.e., concern for others): self-transcendence • egoistic (i.e., concern for personal resources): self-enhancement • hedonic (i.e., concern for pleasure and comfort): self-enhancementThe added contribution would be inquiring, the following: How do these values show up in yourlife currently? How are you currently supporting these values? How do you see the valuesshowing up in your career choice?Fig. 4Fig. 5 [16]A class assignment
Marisa K. Orr is an Assistant Professor in Engineering and Science Education with a joint appointment in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at Clemson University. Her research interests include student persistence and pathways in engineering, gender equity, diversity, and academic policy. Dr. Orr is a recipient of the NSF CAREER Award for her research entitled, ”Empowering Students to be Adaptive Decision-Makers.” American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Work In Progress: Review of Working Memory, Spatial Ability, and Spatial Anxiety in Engineering Problem-SolvingIntroductionOne often overlooked barrier to engineering education and
schools. Since then, he has worked with university faculty to promote and extend K20 STEM outreach in Ohio, Oregon, Texas, and Wyoming. He has authored peer-reviewed articles and papers, presented at national and international conferences, and taught under- graduate/graduate courses in Computer Security, Data Mining, VLSI and pedagogy in STEM.Dr. Andrea Carneal Burrows, University of Wyoming Dr. Andrea C. Burrows is a Professor in the School of Teacher Education and Associate Dean of Under- graduate Programs at the University of Wyoming (UW).She received her doctorate degree from the Uni- versity of Cincinnati in 2011.She was awarded the UW CoEd Early Career Fellowship (2013), UW CoEd Faculty Award for Outstanding
Education and a member of the Physics Department.Dr. Daniel Almeida, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Dr. Daniel Almeida is an Associate Professor in Higher Education Counseling/Student Affairs at Califor- nia Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo. He is Lead Principal Investigator for the NSF-funded California State University Underrepresented Minority STEM Faculty Alliance for Graduate Education & the Professoriate (AGEP) Model: A Culturally-Informed Strengths-Based Approach to Advance Early- Career Faculty Success. Dr. Almeida is also Co-Principal Investigator for the NSF Scholarships in Sci- ence Technology Engineering & Mathematics (S-STEM) grant, Engineering Neighbors: Gaining
Paper ID #35227Redesign of a first year engineering design course lab activity forremote instructionMr. Matthew Robin Kohanfars, UC San Diego I am a mechanical engineering master’s student that is focused on encouraging students to seek engineer- ing careers by developing entertaining and thought-provoking curriculums for the engineering department at UC San Diego. My master’s degree background targets the field of medical technology, where I am able to work in a design laboratory that specializes in researching and developing medical devices. I plan to continue my education to obtain a Ph.D., directing my impact on
influence their decisions toward selectingengineering majors in college and engineering career paths [1]. The Environmental Engineeringand Sustainability summer camp for high school students has been offered at the University ofIllinois at Urbana-Champaign since 2012, under the summer camp outreach umbrella of theGrainger College of Engineering [2]. The week-long camp includes hands-on activities aimed tointroduce students to engineering design, scientific inquiry, sustainability, and how engineerscontribute to protecting human health and the environment. In summer 2020, due to thepandemic, the camp was reformatted from in-person to virtual. The virtual platform enabled thecamp to reach more students, especially those with limited resources to
inclusively in a global environment.11. Under-prepared students need access to supplementary education so that they can be successful in Civil Engineering and careers.12. Universities need to develop a culture of equity and inclusion so that we produce a more diverse future workforce.13. Civil Engineering faculty need to develop more flexible assessment criteria so that curricula can respond to worldwide challenges and opportunities.14. Accrediting bodies need to foster adaptive programs so that curricula can rapidly address current and future societal needs.15. ASCE needs to provide a repository of global teaching best practices so that the rate of innovation is increased.16. Civil Engineering departments need to better communicate
mentoring, tutoring and supplemental instruction,academic advising, basic career advising and academic skills development. Academic advisingis centered on starting math placement, and eight semester degree plans recommend studentstake a common first year curriculum of Introduction to Engineering I and II, Calculus I and II,University Chemistry I, University Physics I, and state minimum core electives. Approximately40% of CoE students begin in Calculus I while 30% begin ahead (in Calculus II or higher), 20%of CoE students begin in Precalculus (one math class behind), and 10% of CoE students begin inCollege Algebra (two math classes behind).Students who are traditional first-year students but who have earned college credits for CalculusI, either
Manufacturing Process Special- ist within the textile industry, which was part of an eleven-year career that spanned textile manufacturing to product development. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Paper ID #35525Dr. Shraddha Joshi, James Madison University Dr. Shraddha Joshi is currently an Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering at James Madison University. She earned her Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from Clemson University with her research focused on understanding the role of requirements in engineering design by novices. At Clemson
chemical engineering.Dr. Marisa K. Orr, Clemson University Marisa K. Orr is an Assistant Professor in Engineering and Science Education with a joint appointment in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at Clemson University. Her research interests include student persistence and pathways in engineering, gender equity, diversity, and academic policy. Dr. Orr is a recipient of the NSF CAREER Award for her research entitled, ”Empowering Students to be Adaptive Decision-Makers.”Dr. Steven C Brandon, Clemson University Senior Lecturer, General Engineering, Clemson University, 2007-present PhD, Food Technology, Clemson Univ. 2005 MS, Mechanical Engineering, Clemson Univ. 1989 BS, Mechanical Engineering, Clemson Univ
our graduating seniors outside of their normal comfort zone in a structuredand supportive class environment. The course has steadily evolved to keep pace with the ever-changing science and technology and the evolving expectations of the profession and the societywe serve. In this model, carefully chosen real world projects are assigned. Faculty and guestspeakers make presentations on engineering design process; engineering project management;leadership in an engineering environment; relationship of engineering projects, business, andpublic policy; global perspective in engineering; and professional career and licensure. Studentswork together in teams while a select number of faculties act as technical consultants. Otherfaculty members act as
bachelor’s degrees has declined by almost40% [3]. At the same time, the demand for engineering graduates for engineering jobs isforecasted to rise by 25% to 30% by the end of the 21st century [4].Research shows that this decline is due primarily to the lack of first-year students expressing aninterest in engineering at the beginning of their college careers. Youth career interests aremoving away from engineering and science to business and management. In addition, many ofthose who enter engineering in the first year switch to a different major after their first or secondyear of study. These attrition rates range from 30% to 50% depending on the institution [5-7].The dropout rate is even higher for underrepresented groups, reaching nearly 70
management. ➢ utilize engineering measurements and tools, units, and conversions. ➢ perform data analysis and graphical display of information. ➢ describe the different types of forces, motion and machine components. ➢ demonstrate understanding of various types of mechanical energy and the nexus between energy-water-environment. The class aims to engage pre-major and freshmen students in learning activities related toengineering careers, while they are taking other pre-engineering classes for the first couple of yearsin their college1. This engagement became even more important due to lower college enrollmentdriven by population demographic changes and due to the negative impact of the COVID-19pandemic. Engineering schools play important
Professor of Mechanical Engineering and Applied Mechanics, University of Pennsylvania. He studies nanotribology, nanomechanics, and scanning probes. He is a recipient of the ASME Newkirk Award, a R&D 100 award, and a NSF CAREER Award. He is a Fellow of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers, the American Physical Society, the Materials Research Society, the AVS, and the Society of Tribologists and Lubrication Engineers. He holds 9 patents and has authored over 200 peer-reviewed publications. Previously, he was a faculty member at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. He received his B.Sc. (University of Toronto, 1991) and his Ph.D. (University of California at Berkeley, 1997) in Physics, and was a postdoctoral
the creation of a Soil Mechanics Engineeringtextbook [14] which will be published under a Creative Common (CC) license. This work isbeing completed by putting into play an array of available interdisciplinary resources within theNew York City College of Technology (City Tech) and the City University of New York(CUNY). These include library collaborations, communication design professionals, students,undergraduate research programs, surplus technician funds and professional communitygoodwill. The result will be a well-rounded, visually engaging and appealing, peer reviewedOER textbook for a mid-career soil mechanics course.Motivation of the First AuthorIt would be misleading to assume that the motivation to start along the path towards
Engineering departments, must cover so manytopics that the student has almost no time to digest the material presented. Looking at two of themost popular texts in fluid mechanics [5, 7], topics presented begin with hydrostatics, followedby an introductory treatment of viscous flows. Internal and external flows are examined next,then potential (inviscid) flows and compressible flows. The books conclude with a chapter onturbomachinery. There is absolutely no way for an instructor to cover this much material withequal thoroughness. Thus choices must be made as to which topics to emphasize. These choicesare often made based on the background of the professor, or the perceived career needs of themajority of the students. Proceedings of
break. During the sametime frame, five other college students from Abilene Christian University died in asingle-car accident when the driver fell asleep and crashed into a bridge. It is commonknowledge that drowsy driving is a major cause of highway accidents—almost as seriousas drinking and driving.2 A need, thus, exists to help people understand the factors thataffect sleep management and to predict the consequences or risks associated with anindividual’s sleep management.The objective of this paper is to overview the development of a sleep simulation modelthat is currently available from a website known as E-COACH, Electronic CollegeOptimal Advisor and Career Helper. As an electronic coach, E-COACH providesseveral tools to help students
learn more), and engage in the process oflearning. For instructors, the general attempt is to keep up with the students' learning pace byadjusting the course activities, and possibly content to the students’ capabilities. At the same time,the instructor is seeking ways to communicate ideas to the students in meaningful and relatableways. The goal of the instructor is to facilitate their learning and provide them the ability to employthese concepts in their future courses and careers. The hope is that students can learn, be engagedin the process of learning, and can adapt to what they learn as they progress in their careers.Expectations, Expected Role of Students: Students ViewAs a student, the expectation is that the instructor is fair/unbiased
, electromechanical signal processing, and computing; the thermome- chanics of energetic materials (including explosives, pyrotechnics, and propellants); additive manufac- turing; and mechanics education. Dr. Rhoads is a Member of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) and a Fellow of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME), where he serves on the Design Engineering Division’s Technical Committee on Vibration and Sound. Dr. Rhoads is a recipient of numerous research and teaching awards, including the National Science Foundation’s Faculty Early Career Development (CAREER) Award; the Purdue University School of Mechanical En- gineering’s Harry L. Solberg Best Teacher Award (three times), Robert W. Fox
an NSF RET Grant and a USDA NIFA grant, and is currently co-PI on three NSF-funded projects in engineering and computer science education, including a Revolutionizing Engineering Departments project. She was selected as a National Academy of Educa- tion / Spencer Postdoctoral Fellow and a 2018 NSF CAREER awardee in engineering education research. Dr. Svihla studies learning in authentic, real world conditions, specifically on design learning, in which she studies engineers designing devices, scientists designing investigations, teachers designing learning experiences and students designing to learn.Prof. Eva Chi, University of New Mexico Eva Chi is a Professor in the Department of Chemical and Biological
Berkeley’s public science center, where she evaluated STEM education programs for all ages. Several studies focused on expanding diversity, access, and inclusion in pre-college engineering education, with attention to changes in participants’ skills, attitudes, and career interests. She earned her B.A. in Anthropology with a minor in Education from UC Berkeley and an M.A. in Museum Studies: Specialization in Education and Interpretation from John F. Kennedy University. Her Master’s Project focused on culturally responsive evaluation practices.Ms. Gennie Miranda, UC San Diego Gennie B. Miranda serves as the Director of Operations in the IDEA Engineering Student Center, Jacobs School of Engineering at UC San Diego, with
/Communion value system – otherwiseknown as the fundamental dimensions [14],[15], or the Big Two [16]. This dichotomousframework of personal value (and subsequent motivation) was initially proposed by Bakan in1966 and was designed to categories people into two sets of “human existence” [17]: theAgentic (those preferring “getting ahead” [18]) versus the Communal (those preferring“getting along” [18]) [17],[18].Diekman et al. [19] argued that “STEM careers are perceived as less likely than careers inother fields to fulfil communal goals (e.g., Working with or helping other people)” in theirpaper, and indeed, found that “STEM careers, relative to other careers, were perceived toimpede communal goals” and that “communal-goal endorsement negatively
National Academy of Sciences Roundtable on Risk, Resilience, and Extreme Events, a member of National Science Foundation (NSF) Engineering Directorate Advisory Committee, and is a member of the National Academies Board on Army Science and Technology (BAST). Dr. DesRoches has received numerous awards, including the Presidential Early Career Award for Scientists and Engineers (PECASE) in 2002 — the highest honor bestowed upon scientists and engineers in the early stages of their careers. Most recently, he was a recipient of the 2007 ASCE Walter L. Huber Civil Engineering Research Prize, the 2015 ASCE Charles Martin Duke Lifeline Earthquake Engineering Award, the Georgia Tech Outstanding Doctoral Thesis Advisor Award (2010
informed judgments incomputing practice based on legal and ethical principles”, and 3) “function effectively as amember or leader of a team engaged in activities appropriate to the program’s discipline”are soft skills that most undergraduate computing programs believe help students havelongevity in their software careers [1]. Tech companies hiring undergraduate softwareengineers state that soft skills like ability to listen effectively, empathize with others, and beagreeable and cooperative during team discussions [2] are skills that new graduates oftenlack. Undergraduate computing capstone courses and sometimes software engineeringcourses are usually a student’s first introduction to both working on a team-based project,creating a prototype
approaches in problem-solving and communication of ideas.IntroductionThis paper discusses an ongoing, successful effort to create a culture of art at a STEM-centereduniversity, not only within the engineering curriculum but also throughout campus life and itsphysical spaces.In what follows, we will offer an overview of the educational model of our university and thequestions and concerns we seek to address. We then offer detailed information of three differentlines of inquiry we have pursued to gather data on the current culture and mindset guidingpedagogical and career decisions: a 2013-14 longitudinal study which examined four cohorts ofhonors students, a 2019 focus group study, and a 2021 student/faculty survey. The results presenta fairly
reform needed thatconnects creativity to engineering in an atmosphere that welcomes diversity. Introduction Engineering is a creative and diverse profession integral to the sustainability of a rapidlyevolving economy, and a field where the diversity and perspectives of women engineers isessential [1], [2], [3]. This study examined the creative self-efficacy (CSE) of undergraduatewomen engineering majors, their beliefs about creativity, how they describe themselves ascreative, and their lived experiences that influenced them to choose engineering as a career path.ABET [4] highlighted the significant connection of creativity in engineering curriculum to theengineering profession. The creative
undergraduate students. During 2018- 2020, she collaborated with Dr. Kavitha Chandra to utilize participatory action research (PAR) as an evaluation approach for the Research, Academics, and Mentoring Pathways (RAMP) summer program for first-year women engineering students.Prof. Kavitha Chandra, University of Massachusetts Lowell Kavitha Chandra is the Associate Dean for Undergraduate Programs and Professor of Electrical and Com- puter Engineering in the Francis College of Engineering at the University of Massachusetts Lowell. She directs the Research, Academics and Mentoring Pathways (RAMP) to Success program that aims to estab- lish successful pathways to graduate school and interdisciplinary careers for new undergraduate
research to explore experiences of engineers with a diagnosed mental illness[21]; preliminary findings discuss Jack, a late career engineer, and his journey with mental healthfrom college to industry. Preliminary analysis highlights specific aspects of the culture ofengineering influencing this journey, such as a lack of information on depression being sharedwhile in college, the de-emphasis on socializing in his first job, and stigmatization faced onceemployers learned about his illness [21]. These findings, although limited, highlight theimportance of studying engineering graduate students’ mental health.In an effort to uncover the landscape of research about engineering graduate student mentalhealth, a scoping literature review was conducted by
interests include student persistence and pathways in engineering, gender equity, diversity, and academic policy. Dr. Orr is a recipient of the NSF CAREER Award for her research entitled, ”Empowering Students to be Adaptive Decision-Makers.” American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 The Centrality of Black Identity for Black Students in Engineering: A Reflection on Methods and TheoryKeywords: Race/ethnicity, Black identity, undergraduate programsIntroductionThe recent emphasis on increasing the number of engineering graduates has been coupled withgreater concern about the lack of diversity in engineering fields. However, despite
grassroots, while also informing policy. Three thrusts that define her research interests at the intersections of engineering, technologies, and education include, ways of thinking that address complex educational challenges, democratization of K-12 engineering education, and online and technology-based learning.Dr. Stacy S Klein-Gardner, Vanderbilt University Stacy Klein-Gardner’s career focuses on P-12 science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) education, particularly as it relates to increasing interest in and participation by females and URMs and teacher professional development. She is an Adjunct Professor of Biomedical Engineering at Vander- bilt University where she is serving as the external evaluator