AC 2012-4103: ”LIFE CYCLE SUSTAINABILITY ECONOMICS” MOD-ULEDr. K.J. Rogers, University of Texas, ArlingtonDr. Melanie L. Sattler, University of Texas, Arlington Melanie Sattler serves as an Associate Professor at the University of Texas, Arlington, where she teaches courses and conducts research related to air quality and sustainable energy. Her research has been spon- sored by the National Science Foundation, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, Luminant Power, and the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency. She has published more than 60 peer- reviewed papers and conference proceedings. In 2010, she received UT Arlington’s Lockheed Martin Excellence in Engineering Education Award. She is a registered
solidand hazardous waste facilities after other public officials have already made decisionsregarding the facilities. Even when engineers are involved in the early stages of thedecision making process, engineering concerns may not prevail. In this context when baddecisions are made inexperienced environmental engineers often make the mistake ofsuccumbing to peer pressure and trying to make the best of a bad situation. This canresult in an ethical failure if engineers continue to participate in the design of a facilitythat is not protective of human health and the environment. This is not to suggest thatengineers are ultimately responsible for environmental injustices. Environmentalinjustice is a failure of government and policy makers to enact and
Colorado’sinstitutions of higher education to address the needs of women and underrepresented students,and she plans to continue to expand the Colorado diversity programs, providing newopportunities for tomorrow’s leaders. Dr. El-Hakim also serves as co-principal investigator at the Colorado State Universitysite as director of the Colorado Alliance for Graduate Education and the Professoriate (AGEP).She is principal investigator for the Fast Track to Work Graduate Scholarship Program, CSEMSUndergraduate Scholarship Program, and the Technology Transfer and Training Center Program,as well, and has directed peer advising, training, and enrichment programs for Hispanic andNative American youth in the Four Corners Region. She continues to write and be
sources for other supportmaterials. Activities focus on lectures, debates, reports and presentations. Students analyze,interpret and report on topics.Abstract RandomThe abstract/random learner is people-oriented, not product-oriented, and can be characterizedas lively and spontaneous (Gregorc, 1982). They can be described as imaginative, perceptive andspontaneous. Individuals in this category prefer to focus on themes, ideas, feelings and activitiesthat allow for group interaction and communication (Butler, 1987).“Abstract random teachers write global objectives. Outcomes show the students’ understanding,appreciation, and interpretation of the subject matter as well as of themselves” (Butler, 1987).Their classes provide students many ways to
theirreading, speaking, and writing skills in Spanish. In particular, we survey how the lab component contributes to achievement offour of the six student learning objectives, namely that students will: 1. Learn vocabulary commonly used in engineering and technology context, 2. Develop the ability to comprehend and use Spanish in settings invariably encountered in our technological society 3. Interact in a more formal setting such as the presentation of a technological/culture project to class and guests, and 4. Explain in the target language the workings of a technological device. We conclude with lessons learned and plans for a final version
organizations, process is a dirty word, the dreaded ‘P’ word, and mostsoftware engineers view it as the stereotypical Dilbert style waste of time. To get complianceand participation, true believers and Software Quality Assurance teams (the process police),frequently resort to the threat of ISO and/or TL 9000 non-compliances. In most cases,compliance obtained in this way amounts to lip service. The net result is that the processesprovide little value and the poor results only serve to reinforce the impression that this “stuff” isuseless and detracts from the real objective, writing code. From my background on various Page 10.1045.1industry projects, I
topics such as teaming, project management, communication and writing, Page 10.406.3 Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering Educationtheories of student learning and appropriate pedagogical approaches to teaching an open-endedsubject such as engineering design. By the end of the course the students design and develop adesign course in their own discipline, including their personal approach and philosophy ofteaching design, along with learning objectives and outcomes with accompanying syllabus,assignments
all participants, a focus group of allparticipants once the program ended, and final surveys from all participants. In our dataanalysis, we used a coding process to derive emergent themes from our data sources. Theresulting findings allowed us to better understand the usability and effectiveness of the program.In terms of iteration, we used the results of our empirical study to understand how to revise theprogram for the second offering. As a result, the second offering of the TC3P during winter2005 showcased a number of changes including the construction of wireframe portfolios near thebeginning of the course, more structured peer evaluations, guest speakers from industry, and ameeting space with better computer access.Since the goals of our
. In some cases, such experiences are vital in helping students identifytheir interests and in helping them attain their potential. Examples of such situations includestudents who are among the first in their families or peer groups at their educational levels, andwho may not have “mentors” or “role models” to help guide them. In particular, experiences thathelp students link their educational background to research efforts, and those which help themrecognize implications of the outcomes of their research effort are powerful tools for recruitmentand retention. As can be imagined, this consideration has not only scientific and technologicalbenefits, but also tremendous long lasting social and economic implications. Further discussionson the
approach is as follows.Entrepreneurial education: • More "out of the box" thinking. • Methods not only to solve problems but also to determine what the problems are. • Projects that allow students to interact with successful entrepreneurs. • Topics that are more relevant to entrepreneurial situations. 1. Idea Generation for Entrepreneurs 2. Legal Forms of Business Structures for Entrepreneurs 3. Marketing and Sales for Entrepreneurs 4. Writing a Business Plan for Entrepreneurs 5. E-Commerce for Entrepreneurs 6. Finance for Entrepreneurs 7. Patent and Invention Protection for Entrepreneurs
’, ‘moderately’, or ‘very much’) and also provide their qualitative feedback. We alsowill ask a number of questions to compare the quizzes: • Which type of problem were you more prepared to answer? • Which type of problem did you find more challenging? • Which type of problem did you find more interesting? • Which type of problem did you prefer?The students were able to rank their preference according to ‘strongly prefer’, ‘prefer’, or ‘nopreference’ for the last question and ‘strongly’, ‘slightly’, or ‘no difference’ for the others.5. Interpreting the ResultsEach quiz will be systematically graded, including partial credit. For example, a cash flowdiagram will be worth a certain amount of points as will be writing down the correct time
essentialfor the effective implementation of projects. In addition they learn the appropriate use ofcomputers in planning and controlling projects, and monitoring progress (actual vs.planned and earned value). The importance of conflict management is emphasized alongwith techniques to manage conflict. The course also offers students with the followingpersonnel development opportunities: • Analytical, Writing, and Presentation Skills - research a specific topic, analyze a problem, think creatively, suggest a solution, and prepare a written or oral presentation of the solution. Page 10.371.2 “Proceedings of the 2005
their applicability to address theusers’ needs(f) Analyze the impact of information technology on individuals, organizations and society, includingethical, legal and policy issues(g) Demonstrate an understanding of best practices and standards and their application(h) Demonstrate independent critical thinking and problem solving skills(i) Collaborate in teams to accomplish a common goal by integrating personal initiative and groupcooperation(j) Communicate effectively and efficiently with clients, users and peers both verbally and in writing,using appropriate terminology(k) Recognize the need for continued learning throughout their careerTable 7 illustrates enrollment and graduation trends in the Information Technology program atSouthern Miss
students, staffmembers and engineering professionals involved in organizations. These activities encouragenetworking by introducing students to their peers and providing information on professional andstudent organizations. In addition to student Society of Women Engineers (SWE) members,members from all engineering minority societies; Society for Hispanic Professional Engineers(SHPE), National Society for Black Engineers (NSBE), and American Indian Science andEngineering Society (AISES) are invited to attend networking activities to get to know Bridgeparticipants and inform them about their organizations.Industry Mentoring: To date, Motorola and other local industry have provided 35 mentors to beindividually matched to WISE Summer Bridge
use in industry.Due to changes in the professional practice of civil engineering, updates to what is taught withinthe civil engineering curriculum are needed.2,3 This is in part due to the abilities of computers toconduct computations much more efficiently than in the past.3 Graduates from structuralengineering programs with considerable computer usage4 have an employment advantage overtheir peers since they tend to be more productive in industrial positions immediately aftergraduation. In most civil engineering programs, computer software use is introduced into thecurriculum directly through discipline specific courses. The literature presents numerousexamples of computer usage and software implementation in discipline specific courses.5,6,7
must answer to this board and ultimately to the sponsorthat they are doing the project for. Initially the students must present their work to the board,with the board members ensuring that proper procedures are being followed. Each board memberevaluates the work and writes comments. Evaluations are given to the students after theirpresentations. If the board requires additional work, the group would have to resubmit theirproposal before they could proceed to the sponsor submittal step.Once the proposal has been accepted by the board, the proposal must be submitted to thesponsor. This proposal is the agreement between the student group and the sponsor on what isrequired by the group, when it will be delivered and the various responsibilities on
percent of our IT (Information Technology) workers are foreign born and fifty percent ofthem are on H1B visa. In recent years almost sixty percent of the continuously increasing H1Bvisas are filled up by the qualified engineers and technologists from Indian subcontinentcountries. A comparison study of overall core curriculum of engineering and technologyprograms of those countries to that of the United States towards international accreditation ispresented. The future engineers and technologists must be able to interact with foreign peers andcustomers to fulfill their obligation in global nature. The emerging facts from successfulcompanies, organizations, and universities have established that the real source of power in aknowledge base economy
, universities, businesses and community to participate since they are the beneficiaries of the effort. 3. Introduce excitement and fun into learning SMET and parity for girls and minorities in numbers and participation. 4. Finally, the goal is to use informal science so it will be a major supporter of formal SMET education in filling the pipeline for colleges, universities and the future technical workforce.The NeedAccording to the National Science Teacher’s Association, the Third International Mathematicsand Science Study Repeat TIMSS-R validates the results of the 1995 TIMSS study “that after 4thgrade, students in the United States fall behind their international peers as they pass through theschool system1". A recent study by
upon a protocol developed through theCenter’s professional development activities15. The protocol links the state sciencecontent standards and the specific knowledge and skills students are expected to acquirewith the learning expectations of the students by the teachers. The program instructorsplan standards-based lessons that include the learning expectations of the standards, andassessment of student work in relation to the expectations of the standards. Theprocedure allows the instructors to write and implement standards-based lesson plans thatinclude the assessment and documentation of students’ achievement of the standards inthese lessons. Program instructors develop rubric assessment instruments to evaluate theextent to which their
little resemblance to the desktop PCs and servers that IT emphasizesbut are becoming part of the IT mainstream as more and more systems converge.An uninformed observer may conclude from the forgoing description of the emerging ITmovement, that hardware is necessarily an important part of all such programs’ curriculum. Indiscussions with our peer institutions across the country, we have discovered this not to be thecase. A recent survey, conducted via the ACM-SIGITE (Special Interest Group on InformationTechnology Education) list server illustrates this. This survey asked each institution to selfassess their coverage of the following 8 topics: Networking, AC and DC fundamentals, Power(consumption, heat, etc.), Modulation techniques, Signal
. The students use conduction,convection, and radiation as methods to remove (evaporate) water from the orange juice toconcentrate it. From these experiments the students determine which method they would like touse to concentrate their orange juice. Figure 1. Example of Student Design of Northeastern Project – Great Orange Juice SqueezeThe third section is about the engineering process. Students learn about flowsheets andprocedures and how they are used to communicate engineering solutions. They then design theirown concentration process, draw a flowsheet, and write a procedure for their process. They alsomust take into consideration safety issues that they may encounter in their work environment.In order to develop their process, they need
Process for Integration of the classes From the interviews of both instructors, a common laboratory schedule was developed Theschedule and topics are given in Table 1. Table 1 - Lab Schedule Developed for Integrated Classes Week Auto Capstone and CIM Common Lab- Mondays 1:20-3:30 PM 1 ME: Lecture on creativity, team dynamics, brainstorming techniques; IC: team building; IE: Introduction to CIM Assignment: Project brainstorming session 2 ME: Lecture on the design process, product attributes, design criteria, and proposal writing; In
ASEE Abstract 2004 Conference A "Grass Roots" Mentoring Model to Create Change Robin Autenrieth, Karen Butler-Purry, Angie Hill Price, and Jan Rinehart Texas A&M UniversityAbstractFor more than fifteen years the women faculty in the College of Engineering at TexasA&M University have built a community through social activities, seminars, andoutreach programs that have served well as a mentoring mechanism between junior andsenior faculty and peers. What started as social activities during lunch or after work hasevolved into the formation of the Women Engineering Faculty Interest Group (WEFIG),a university
courses. In a post-semester meeting, the general feedbackfrom the faculty was positive. Most felt that the experience had helped them to understand theirindividual courses better and to begin to see how their courses fit into the larger program.Several of the faculty took advantage of the opportunity to see what their peers were doing.None expressed concern for this data sharing. The single administrator present at the meetingexpressed satisfaction with the instrument and the ability to review the current status of all of the Page 9.573.5active courses in the curriculum. Some faculty who were also involved in ABET committees Proceedings of
. Due to the complexity of the project, students work in teams of two. Grading consists oftwo major progress reports that are graded by the coordinator, a formal presentation of theirwork before their peers, lab journals graded periodically by the assistants and progresstowards completion, which is also graded by the assistants. Page 9.1071.2Robot Specification Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual conference & Exposition CopyrightÀ 2004, American Society for engineering Education At it inception, the robot was a mechanical platform kit with custom analog control basedon
decisions have on theproducts or projects they are working on, the customer who buys the product, the owner whofinances the project and their reputation as a designer/builder and as a person. AECs through theirimportant work have vast impact on the lives of many people through health and safety issues aswell as financial issues. Bibliography • American Association of Architects (AIA). www.aia.org. • Banik, G.C. (2003) “Writing an Effective Case Study”. Proceedings: 39th Associated School of Construction (ASC) Annual Conference, Pp. 1-7, Clemson University, Clemson. • Construction Management Association of America (CMAA). www.cmaa.org. • Dorsey, Robert (1999
would be unlikely to argue that it is as significant of a learning objective as“drew meaningful and supportable conclusions.”Once the rubrics have been optimized, the next major task to be addressed is differentiating theperformance of individuals from the performance of the team. It is possible that a team couldhave one or more member who fully attains the desired learning outcomes, but whose teammatesfall substantially short of achieving these outcomes. Currently, the Chemical EngineeringDepartment at Rowan University uses a peer-assessment technique modeled after the processdescribed by Felder [26].Although this is a useful tool, it is somewhat over-reliant on student evaluation of their peers.Our experience indicates that reasonably
from the low performing schools of the region. The students are chosen sothat there is a mix of both high and low performing students and racial diversity in thegroup. The program endeavors to provide a positive experience for the participants so asto inspire them to prepare for MSET related fields in college. Also, it is hoped that theparticipants themselves will act as messengers and advocates of the program and program Page 8.853.1objectives among their siblings and peers. Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2003, American Society for Engineering
, organizations and society, including ethical, legal and policy issues; (g) Demonstrate an understanding of best practices and standards and their application; (h) Demonstrate independent critical thinking and problem solving skills; (i) Collaborate in teams to accomplish a common goal by integrating personal initiative and group cooperation; (j) Communicate effectively and efficiently with clients, users and peers both verbally and in writing, using appropriate terminology; (k) Recognize the need for continued learning throughout their career. This Committee has also defined the main topic and sub topics of the core curriculum. The main topics are as follows: Security, Social & Professional Issues, Information
from what they have done while in the game. A term-long project providesadditional experiential material, while weekly reflective writings help the students exercise theirreflective skills and discover what they have learned.Last spring, as we, instructors, were discussing the many (19 at the time) reflective techniquesthat we had used in our course6, we realized that each technique was working on one of threedifferent levels - individual, team, or project. We also realized that our course had moreindividual techniques than team techniques, and more team techniques than project techniques.This can be illustrated by the following pyramid structure: project