understandinginternationally and universities must make student exchanges possible without delayinggraduation. This case study from India demonstrates how universities and institutions of higherlearning in India can ensure globalization of their academic programs, teaching and learningprocess and provide an experiential learning to students in a cross-cultural environment. Animportant step in the process is to have national and international recognition of the academicprograms so that institutions and educators can be confident that their students will have asuccessful academic experience as well as a successful cultural experience. Flexibility inscheduling is also required to accommodate differences in the academic calendars. This paperpresents how one private
Paper ID #45351Design of Web-based Engineering Courses to Enhance Student LearningDr. Shashi S. Marikunte, Pennsylvania State University, Harrisburg, The Capital College Shashi S. Marikunte is an Associate Teaching Professor of Civil Engineering and the Acting Chair of Civil, Construction, and Environmental Engineering at The Pennsylvania State University, Middletown, Pennsylvania. He serves as the Program Evaluator for the Engineering Technology Accreditation Commision (ETAC) and Engineering Accreditation Commision (EAC) of ABET. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Design of Web-based
processing research include the design and modeling of intelligent controls, Kalman filters, and automation. Engi- neering education research includes curriculum and laboratory development for these concepts.Mrs. Anastasia Marie Rynearson, Purdue University, West Lafayette Anastasia Rynearson is a Purdue Doctoral Fellow pursuing a degree in Engineering Education at Purdue University. She received a B.S. and M.Eng. in Mechanical Engineering at the Rochester Institute of Technology. Her teaching experience includes outreach activities at various age levels as well as a position as Assistant Professor in the Mechanical Engineering Department at Kanazawa Technical College. Her current research interests focus on early P-12
AC 2007-17: A TEN-STEP PROCESS FOR IMPLEMENTING ASERVICE-LEARNING COURSEMysore Narayanan, Miami University DR. MYSORE NARAYANAN obtained his Ph.D. from the University of Liverpool, England in the area of Electrical and Electronic Engineering. He joined Miami University in 1980 and teaches a wide variety of electrical, electronic and mechanical engineering courses. He has been invited to contribute articles to several encyclopedias and has published and presented dozens of papers at local, regional , national and international conferences. He has also designed, developed, organized and chaired several conferences for Miami University and conference sessions for a variety of organizations. He
30-minute blocks of time at least 4 days a week. Set realistic scholarship goals and prioritize activities. 2. Publish or present on ABET assessment experiences and procedures. 3. Publish or present on new course and curriculum developments, experiences in the classroom: what works, what doesn't, innovative methods for enhancing student learning, assessment of pedagogical methods, etc 4. Publish or present on online teaching experiences; comparison of online versus face-to-face or hybrid courses as it relates to student learning 5. In the absence of laboratories, consider scholarship in the areas of computer modeling and simulation, and pedagogy 6. Consider writing and publishing a textbook in your field
leads to: employmentopportunities for graduates, co-op activities, and potential development of collaborative researchprograms. Nevertheless, the present status of most adjunct faculty is tenuous, subject to shiftingenrollment, and considered as a temporary arrangement, or until a “full-time” faculty isappointed. Unfortunately adjuncts, often with proven records of excellent teaching, aremarginalized by the academic systems in place today; and their efforts and contributions to theacademic process are undervalued. If fair treatment, and proper recognition are accorded toadjuncts; then, their morale, loyalty to the institution, and their teaching effectiveness wouldimprove markedly.Next, the paper reports on a success story of an adjunct, a
Paper ID #17052Experimental Centric Pedagogy in First-Year Engineering CoursesProf. Kenneth A. Connor, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Kenneth Connor is a professor in the Department of Electrical, Computer, and Systems Engineering (ECSE) where he teaches courses on electromagnetics, electronics and instrumentation, plasma physics, electric power, and general engineering. His research involves plasma physics, electromagnetics, photon- ics, biomedical sensors, engineering education, diversity in the engineering workforce, and technology enhanced learning. He learned problem solving from his father (ran a gray iron foundry
author) for the mechanical engineering program, this forced me into an unexpectedsituation. As many other engineering professors can attest, teaching laboratory intensive classesand design courses adds additional layers of complexity within the online delivery mode.The co-author who taught two other sections of senior design and the first author had toimmediately devise a plan on how to continue to deliver a meaningful design experience tostudents online in the middle of the semester. While most programs in the country adjusted theircapstone programs to face the unexpected pandemic, our program had its own set of challengesto overcome. The first concern for the authors was how to continue to provide a meaningfuldesign experience to the students
be necessary that the student understand direct engineering applications3. Curricula for in-class lectures should highlight real world applications, and laboratories should serve to furtherenhance the understanding through physical models. Furthermore, engineering laboratoriesshould teach the necessary skills that an engineer should possess such as: the ability to properlyuse instrumentation, create models, conduct an experiment, analyze data, and ultimately design4.Additionally, a student should develop a deeper understanding of safety, communication,teamwork, and ethics5. Assuming that each of these objectives is being met, students interestedin engineering should have the confidence and the ability to complete an engineering education.If
Paper ID #12190Assessing and Developing a First Year Introduction to Mechanical Engineer-ing CourseDr. Robert J. Rabb P.E., The Citadel Robert Rabb is an associate professor and the Mechanical Engineering Program Director at The Citadel. He previously taught mechanical engineering at the United States Military Academy at West Point. He received his B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from the United States Military Academy and his M.S.E. and PhD in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Texas at Austin. His research and teaching interests are in mechatronics, regenerative power, and multidisciplinary engineering.Jason
. Page 11.1072.5 Reductionism is generally the accepted approach for attaining a Ph.D. in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. While extending one’s specialized (Ph.D. level) knowledge to a broader problem can provide new and nontraditional approaches, it is more likely to not lead to a successful result. The same applies at the departmental level. At USU the name change required bringing in new faculty with specialization in chemical engineering, bioengineering, Materials Science, and analytical chemistry to complement the old guard rooted in traditional Agriculture and Irrigation Engineering. The breadth of faculty knowledge extends beyond the walls of the classroom or teaching laboratory into faculty
universities need to provide their undergraduate students with“a research experience that is genuine and meaningful.” 13 However, the difficulty is to putengineering students, “as much as possible, in the shoes of the engineer,” 14 when the technologyis as new as the need to teach it, and there is a short supply of both engineers and engineeringtools in the new technology. Page 9.119.8 Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2004, American Society for EngineeringTo address this concern, laboratory space and equipment are available to allow a
Session 1625 Integration of Software Tools into a Multi-disciplinary Undergraduate Student Design Project Friederike C. Mund, Anestis I. Kalfas, Reza S. Abhari Turbomachinery Laboratory Institute of Energy Technology Swiss Federal Institute of Technology 8092 Zurich, SwitzerlandAbstract This paper presents a pilot scheme for the integration of modern state-of-the-artturbomachinery design tools into project-based education of undergraduate students. This efforthas been part of a
, 1998. 2 U.S. Department of Labor Statistics, http://www.bls.gov/ May 8, 2011. 3 Dean J, Schechter AN. “Sickle-cell anemia: molecular and cellular bases of therapeutic approaches,” New England Journal of Medicine. 1978;299:752-63. 4 Horne M. “Sickle cell anemia as a rheological disease.” The American Journal of Medicine. 1981;70:288-98. 5 Merrill E. “Rheology of Blood,” Physiol Rev. 1969;49:863-88. 6 Vernengo, J., C. Purdy and S. Farrell, An Experiment for the Undergraduate Laboratory that Teaches Fundamental Concepts of Rheology within the Context of Sickle Cell Anemia, Chemical Engineering Education, in press, 2014. 7 Lysaght, M.J. Boggs, D.R. and Taimisto, M.H., “Membranes in Artificial Organs,” in Synthetic Membranes, M.B. Chenoweth, ed
other real world applications.References:[1] American Society of Mechanical Engineering, “ASME Vision 2030: Creating the Future of Mechanical Engineering Education,” Executive Summary, ASME Board on Education, go.asme.org/v2030, September 2012.[2] American Society of Civil Engineers, “Achieving the Vision for Civil Engineering in 2025,” ASCE, Reston, VA, August 2009.[3] T. Korman, and L. Simonian, “Using building information modeling to teach mechanical, electrical, and plumbing coordination,” in 2010 Annual Conference & Exposition (pp. 15- 1320).[4] R. Palomera-Arias, R. and R. Liu, “BIM laboratory exercises for a MEP systems course in a construction science and
time he earned an MBA and managed engineering, manufacturing, and plants in a wide variety of industries. He has spent the last 16 teaching industrial and manufacturing engineering, engineering management, and the management of technology. He is current program chair of the IE Division of ASEE and a director in two other divisions. He is past president of SEMS and ASEM. Page 14.369.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 Converting Face-to-Face Classes to Web-Based On-Line College ClassesAbstractDue to the increasing interest in web-based
), 44 - 53. Page 14.375.8[3] Farnes, N. (1975). “Student Centered Learning,” Teaching at a Distance, 3, 2-6.[4] King, B., McCausland, H. and Nunan, T. (2001) “Converting To Online Course AndProgram Delivery: The University Of South Australia Case Study,” International Review ofResearch in Open and Distance Learning: 1, 2. http://www.icaap.org/iuicode?149.1.2.7[5] Ko, C. C., Chen, B. M., Hu, S., Ramakrishnan, V., Cheng, C. D., Zhuang, Y. & Chen, J.,(2001). “A web-based virtual laboratory on a frequency modulation experiment,” IEEETransaction on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, -Part-C, Applications and Reviews, 31 (3). 295-303.[6] Macmillan, B
themselves comprehend and retain their content more deeply when using the AEapproach [8]. Because of the apparent advantages of the AE approach, institutions andorganizations such as the Engineering Ambassadors Network [9-10] are teaching the approach totheir students. Shown in Figure 1 are two slides that follow the assertion-evidence approach. Figure 1: Two example slides that follow the assertion-evidence approach [4]. Note that the headlines are sentence assertions, as opposed to phrases. Note also that the bodies of the slides contain only visual evidence, not bullet lists. Although the AE approach is spreading on a collegiate level [10], it is not yet widely usedin professional settings. To explore how to spread the
Paper ID #11972Improving Student Technical Communication via Self ReflectionMr. Kenneth P Mineart, North Carolina State University Kenneth Mineart received his Bachelor’s degree in Chemical & Biochemical Engineering from the Uni- versity of Iowa. Currently, he is a doctoral student in Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering at North Carolina State University where he works in the field of block copolymer science with Professor Richard Spontak. Kenneth has regularly served as a graduate teaching assistant for a variety of courses including: Unit Operations Laboratory, Material and Energy Balances, Introduction to
Paper ID #28121Board 13: Manufacturing Division: Improving Student Engagement in aSenior-Level Manufacturing Course for Mechanical Engineering StudentsDr. Joshua Gargac, University of Mount Union Joshua Gargac is an assistant professor of mechanical engineering at the University of Mount Union in Alliance, OH, where he advises the mechanical engineering senior capstone projects and SAE Baja team. In addition, Dr. Gargac teaches first-year engineering courses, computer-aided design, kinematics and dynamics of machinery, and manufacturing science. He received his BSME from Ohio Northern University and a PhD in Bioengineering
an Assistant Professor in the Communication Studies Department at Rowan University. Her research and teaching interests focus on deliberative democracy and a participatory civic culture. In her capacity as Director of the Public Speaking course, Simone has become increasingly involved in the scholarship of teaching and learning, with a focus on learning outcomes assessment.Stephanie Farrell, Rowan University Stephanie Farrell is Associate Professor of Chemical Engineering at Rowan University. She received her Ph.D. from NJIT, M.S. from Stevens Institute of Technology, and B.S.E. from the University of Pennsylvania. Stephanie has developed innovative classroom and laboratory
faculty member at WSU, similar to what was donein co-TEACH. A more exciting application of this technology will be to bring the K-12 studentsinto the faculty member’s research laboratory to let them see activities and equipment that wouldnot be accessible to them at their school. We also wish to obtain better follow-up on student attitudes concerning engineering aftertheir teachers have been participants in our program. We are currently working with a facultymember in the Department of Educational Leadership and Counseling Psychology, whosespecialty is assessment, on developing an instrument to measure the student’s attitudes towardsengineering. This instrument will be used in the classrooms of the participating teachers beforeand after
Enhancing Engineering Problem Solving Skills in a Mechatronics Course Olakunle Harrison, Viveca K. Deanes Tuskegee University, Tuskegee, AlabamaAbstractA mechatronics course provides an excellent opportunity for teaching students problem solvingskills in a multifaceted engineering context. This nontraditional mechanical engineering courseinvolves the integration of mechanics concepts with electronics and software schemes. Thecourse provides an excellent environment for teaching engineering design skills and exposesstudents to multidisciplinary problem solving exercises. Students in the course described get ahealthy dose of the variety and
engineering program, senior design is uncommon to the750 non-ABET-accredited physics programs. It is in the senior design experience the studentsapply their technical laboratory skills and broad physics background to open-ended problemsoften in the research groups. To the extent practical we use the senior design sequence as anopportunity for a true undergraduate research experience. By directing senior design studentsinto the physics research laboratories, we align the teaching mission with the research interestsof the faculty thereby reducing the natural tension that exists in faculty at research universitiesbetween research and teaching. Senior design begins with the student selecting an area of interest and then meeting withindividual
. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice- Hall 2001.[2] G. Bebis, D. Egbert, and M. Shah. “Review of computer vision education,” IEEE Transactions on Education, (46)1:2-21, Feb 2003.[3] W. Clement, “An instructional robotics and machine vision laboratory,” IEEE Transactions on Education., 37:87-90, Feb 1994.[4] B. Maxwell, “Teaching computer vision to computer scientists: Issues and a comparative textbook review,” Int. J. Pattern Recognition Artificial Intelligence, (15)5:757-773, 2001.[5] S.M. Smith and J.M. Brady. “SUSAN - a new approach to low level image processing.” Int. Journal of Computer Vision, (23)1:45--78, May 1997.[6] M. A. Turk and A. P. Pentland. “Face recognition using eigenfaces,” in Proc. of
AC 2012-3756: A FORMAL RESEARCH STUDY ON CORRELATING STU-DENT ATTENDANCE TO STUDENT SUCCESSMr. Jason K. Durfee, Eastern Washington University Jason Durfee received his B.S. and M.S. degrees in mechanical engineering from Brigham Young Univer- sity. He holds a Professional Engineer certification. Prior to teaching at Eastern Washington University, he was a military pilot, an engineering instructor at West Point, and an airline pilot. His interests include aerospace, aviation, professional ethics, and piano technology.Dr. William R. Loendorf, Eastern Washington University William R. Loendorf is currently a Full Professor of engineering and design at Eastern Washington Uni- versity. He obtained his B.Sc. in engineering
development,laboratories, technical conferences -- sources of continuing learning -- retain the image offrills or extras or perquisites, something done when there are funds not needed for somethingimportant. While some of this shortfall may be attributed to the short-term thinking characteristic of thetypical corporation, other -- perhaps more fundamental -- reasons may be equally influential.Even casual observers of education -- i.e., structured learning -- quickly note that wecommonly and pervasively think about learning as having definite starting and ending points.From kindergarten through graduate school, the language applied to education and learning isbounded by beginnings and completions. The lexicon reflects a built-up chasm betweenlearning
design and manufacturing professionals.• Cost of entry to the CAD environment is much lower, and the payoff much higher.• That the students will understand the enormous impact that a true 3D design process can have on a modern product design and manufacturing process.• That they will understand the potential of rapid prototyping, computer generated animationWith the above principle in mind, it has been decided to effect the following integration inthe design manaufacturing curriculum.• A common integrated computer-aided engineering software package that covers drafting, analysis, manufacturing and other application of design courses• The materials that are most relevant to concurrent teaching in a parallel fashion include
” class.Providing students with such a hands-on approach enables them to improve their roboticskills by using rapid prototyping and microcontrollers for performing different roboticapplications.Background In Drexel University’s School of Technology and Professional Studies, manycourses related to robotics, design, and materials are offered to the students in theBachelor of Science in Applied Engineering Technology program. Courses such asRobotics and Mechatronics, Quality Control, Manufacturing Materials, Microcontrollers,and Applied Mechanics can benefit from the laboratory experience in applications ofmechatronics, robotics, and rapid prototyping. As well as helping in the teaching ofvarious courses, such experience benefits students who are
laboratory environments. To give an example, theeducational laboratory equipment favorably utilized in mechanical vibrations and control theorycourses is tailored with custom software and data acquisition systems to implement inputs and recordoutput data. This inhibits students’ understanding of signal flow and data recording. Consequently,students struggle to replicate similar tasks using low-cost alternatives to actuate the mechanisms ordesign a controller to accomplish desired tasks. To address this problem, we collected feedback fromundergraduate mechanical engineering students enrolled in mechanical vibrations (junior level) andcontrol theory courses (senior level) to assess their confidence levels and proficiency inprogramming, identifying