excellent), how well has the program fulfilled for you the purpose that it was created for – to prepare students for a workplace that integrates business and engineering principles? Please explain.3. Which portion(s) of the program (lectures, projects, internship, etc.) did you find most beneficial and why?4. On a scale of 1-10 (1 being poor, 10 being excellent), how appropriate were the ILTM themes (leadership, ethics, management, technology, globalization, etc.) when you participated in the program? Should the same themes be emphasized today? Are there themes that should be added?5. On a scale of 1-10 (1 being not at all, 10 being very), how important was ILTM in helping you in finding a job after graduation? Has it
& ElectricTexas Utilties Electric Commanche Peak 1 1150 PWR 12/74 8/90 188 5130Union Electric Callaway 1125 PWR 4/76 4/85 108 2597Washington Public WNP-2 1095 BWR 3/73 12/84 141 2802 Power Supply SystemWolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corp. Wolf Creek 1135 PWR 5/77 9/85 100 2487(1) Duplicate unit on s am e s ite with sam e cons truction perm it, but later scheduled com merical operating date.(2) Includes interes t on funds us ed during cons truction (IFUDC).Source: Utility Data
student realization projects know theseprojects are very resource intensive. The resources required span a wide range of people,including faculty, technicians and graduate students, space, equipment, and money. All of thoseitems are scarce resources at all universities. At Virginia Tech we have been fortunate to haveadequate funding, administrative support, bright students who were interested, and faculty withthe desire to both work with students and to participate in the design and realization of theseprojects. From the early 1980’s until the late 1990’s, however, space was a continuing problem.Teams worked wherever shop space could be found. Often the space was not well-suited for the
. Page 9.631.3 Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright ø 2004, American Society for Engineering Education FU S E - Sum m er 2 003 FIELD TR IP EV A LU A T IO N FO R M Field Trip to:____ ___________ _______ D ate: __________ ______ 1. The m ost im p ortant thing I learned from p articipating in this field trip w as:________ _ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ 2. This field trip can be im proved if_______ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___ 3. D id this field trip increase your understanding of the operations
Architecture.Acknowledgement: Funding for development of “Technology Literacy” by the National ScienceFoundation (DUE-0126876) (CCLI-Adaptation and Implementation) is gratefully acknowledged.8. References1. Ollis, D.F., “Freshman Laboratory for Product and Process Engineering,” Innovator (SUCCEED engineering education consortium).2. Beaudoin, D. and D. F. Ollis, “Product and Process Engineering Laboratory for First Year Engineering Students,” 1995 (Edmonton, Alberta, Canada). J. Eng’g. Education.3. Brown, A. and D.F. Ollis, “Team Teaching: A Freshman Rhetoric and Laboratory Experience,” ASEE, Washington, DC, June, 1996.4. Brown, A., Luyendyk, S. and Ollis, D.F., “Implementing an English and Engineering Collaboration,” in Liberal Education in Twenty-First
Education: II. Teaching Methods ThatWork”, Chemical Engineering Education, 34(1), 2000, pp. 26-39.5 S. Feiman-Nemser and M. Parker, “Mentoring in Context: A comparison of Two U.S. Programs for BeginningTeachers”, International Journal of Educational Research, 1993, pp. 699-718.6 Kilian, C., Modern Control Theory: Components and Systems (2nd ed.), Delmar, Albany, NY, 2001.7 R. Felder and R. Brent, “Cooperative Learning in Technical Courses: Procedures, Pitfalls, and Payoffs”, ERICDocument Reproduction Service (ED 377038), 1994.8 Knowles, M., Holton, E., & Swanson, R. (Eds.), The adult learner (5th ed.), Butterworth-Heinemann, Woburn,MA, 1998.REX N. FISHER is a Professor in the Computer Science and Engineering Department at Brigham Young
, “U.S. Engineering: Enabling the Nation’s Capacity to Perform,” ASEE National Conference,June 2003, Nashville, TNChristensen, Clayton, The Innovator’s Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail, HarvardBusiness School Press, 1997.Collins, Jim, Good to Great, HarperCollins Publishers, 2001.Kaplan, Robert S. and David P. Norton, The Balanced Scorecard, Harvard Business School Press, 1996.Lever, O.William Jr., “Selling and Marketing of R&D”, Research Technology Management, Jul/Aug 1997.Miller, Robert B. and Stephen E. Heiman, Strategic Selling, Warner Books, 1985.Moore, Geoffrey A., Crossing the Chasm, Harper Business, 1999.Murray, William J., Relationship Sales Strategies, 1994.Porter, Michael E., Competitive Advantage: Creating
9.1053.12wide-web,, accessed Fall 1998.[3] Ramesh, S. K. “ Virtual Laser Laboratory,”, accessed March 2001.Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright ø 2004, American Society for Engineering Education[4] Ngo, C.C., M. J. Voon, and F. C. Lai. “A Web-based Measurement Lab for Thermal Sciences,”Proceedings, 2002 Annual Conference and Exposition, American Society for Engineering Education.[5] Lin, P., H. Broberg, and A. Mon. “A Web-based Lab for Distance Learning,”Proceedings, 2002 Annual Conference and Exposition, American Society for Engineering Education.[6] Gustavsson, I. “A Remote Laboratory for Electrical Experiments,” Proceedings, 2002 Annual Conferenceand
Downing, Ali Naqvi, Dan Feiertag, Dave Swingle, Dave Gould, and Peter Hohmeier for valuable assistance in the process of developing and reviewing course material. References 1. D. R. McKinnis, et. al., “The Instructional Benefits from Faculty Participation in Industrial Outreach,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 90, no. 3, 2001, pp. 429-436. 2. M. Gorman, et. al., “Transforming the Engineering Curriculum: Lessons Learned from a Summer at Boeing,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 90, no. 1, 2001, pp. 143-150. 3. S. Bhavani and M. D. Aldridge, “Teamwork Across Disciplinary Boundaries: A Bridge between College and the Workplace,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 89, no. 1, 2000, pp. 13-16. 4. T. Yamada and R. Todd, “The Quest for
://www.wrl.org/info/gis/gis.descrip).Beard, K (1995) Digital Spatial Libraries: A context for engineering and Library Collaboration, Information Technology and Libraries Vol. 14, pp 79-86.Boxall, James (2003) Geolibraries: Geographers, Librarians, and Spatial Collaboration, Canadian Geographer, Toronto, Vol. 47, Iss. 1; pg 18.Derby, F. W. and Ofosu, W. (2000) Geographic Information Systems as a Complement to Information Science and Technology Program at Penn State, Proceedings of the 2000 ASEE conference, St. Louis, MO, ON CDROM.Frazer, S. L. (2002) Virginia Geographic Information System (GIS) Programs and Resources for Libraries, Virginia Libraries, September 2002, pp. 18-20.Biographical informationBRUCE REID is
Competence 17. Program Review and DevelopmentFor each standard enumerated above, a specific matrix was developed to show how the variouscourses in the program meet the State Board of Education criteria for adoption of a new teachingcredential proposal. This process consumes much space, and only an example for Standard 2 isshown below. Our breadth courses address Standard 2 by developing foundations in communication;production; power, energy and transportation; and technology. The table below outlines inwhich course/s the required areas are covered. Following the table is a catalog description listingof all breadth courses that address Standard 2.Required foundation areas. a.) Communications b.) Production c.) Power, energy and
social engineering. It is partly in order to prevent this misuse that we haveundertaken a study of systems thinking at our home institution, where the conversation about itsethical implications will undoubtedly continue.Bibliography1. Ackoff, R. (1971, July). “Towards a system of systems concepts.” Management Science 17(11):661-671.2. Bausch, K. (2001). The emerging consensus in social systems theory. New York: Kluwer Academic/ Plenum.3. Blackburn, S. (1999). Think. New York: Oxford University Press.4. Capra, F. (1996). The web of life. New York: Anchor.5. Deming, W.E. (2000). The new economics (2nd ed.). Cambridge: The MIT Press. (Original work published 1994)6. Forrester, J. (1999 June 8). System dynamics: The foundation under
. LENghia T. Le is an Assistant Professor of Electrical Engineering Technology of Purdue University. Heteaches at Purdue University, School of Technology at New Albany, Indiana. He earned his B. S. and M. E.E. E. degrees from the University of Louisville. He specializes is instrumentation and controls. He can bereached at: nle1@purdue.edu.TERRENCE P. O’CONNORTerrence P. O’Connor is an Associate Professor of Electrical Engineering Technology for PurdueUniversity. He teaches at the New Albany site where he has taught all but one of the courses in the twoyear degree offered there. He is primarily interested in ELF/ULF signal detection in the area of research,but also has delved into engineering ethics. He is a graduate of Northern Arizona University
Information technology in Construction, Vol. 3,http://itcon.org/, Sweden, 1998.[7] FUTCHER, K.G. and Rowlinson, S.: IT Survey within the Construction Industry of Hong Kong,Proceedings of the 8th International Conf. on Durability of Building Materials and Components, Canada, 1999.[8] O’BRIEN, M.J. and Al-Biqami, N.M.: Survey of Information Technology and The Structure of the SaudiArabian Construction Industry, Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Durability of BuildingMaterials and Components, Canada, 1999.[9] RIVARD, H.: A Survey on the Impact of Information Technology on the Canadian Architecture,Engineering and Construction Industry, Electronic Journal of Information technology in Construction, Vol. 3http:/itcon.org, Sweden, 2000.[10
that was covered in the weekly projects, and the studentswere able retain the knowledge they had gained because of the reinforcement throughapplications.The final projects were also a good way to motivate the students for future learning. Thestudents learned how to independently find information about specific sensors and actuators thatwere necessary for their projects even though they may not have used those specific sensors inthe smaller projects. They also had a great feeling of accomplishment as their projects cametogether and most were glad they had taken the course.Bibliography1. Netmedia Inc., Support Documents for BX-24 Basic Express Microprocessor version 1.46, Tucson, AZ, 2000.2. Kiefer S., Tri-State University Faculty Web Site
. Page 9.1095.10 “Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2004, American Society for Engineering Education”Bibliography1. Educating Future Army Officers for a Changing World, Office of the Dean, United States MilitaryAcademy, West Point, NY 2002.2. Dick, Walter and Lou M. Carey. The Systematic Design of Instruction. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1996.3. Gagne, Robert M., Leslie J. Briggs, and Walter W. Wager. Principles of Instructional Design.Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, 19924. Wankat, Phillip C. and Frank S. Oreovicz. Teaching Engineering. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1993.5. Lowman, Joseph. Mastering the Techniques of Teaching. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1995.6
temporarily to allow lower priority tasks an opportunity to execute. • Suspended (S) - In the suspended state the task is waiting for some resource. Once the resource is available the task transitions to the ready state and awaits processor time. • Rescheduling (X) - The rescheduling state is entered whenever a task runs to completion but does not need to be repeated and enter the ready state right away. A scheduling algorithm is used to determine how tasks are prioritized to obtainprocessor execution time. A single type of scheduling algorithm does not fit allapplications. In fact, there are multiple types of scheduling algorithms briefly describedbelow. A particular scheduling algorithm is employed for a specific application [4-6
foundation and skills so that notime need be spent in class teaching the students programming. In addition, the authors willmake themselves available for consultation with any faculty that wish for or require additionalhelp.The long term goal is make one or both of these packages an integral part of the undergraduateengineering curriculum. Not only will this expand the scope of problems that can be addressed incourses, but will provide the student will valuable skills when they enter the workforce.References1. Chapra, S. C. and Canale, R. P., “Numerical Methods for Engineers, 4th Ed.”, McGraw Hill (2002)2. Brannan, K. P. and Murden, J. A., “From C++ to Mathcad: Teaching an Introductory Programming Course with a Non-Traditional Programming
constraintsincluding continuity, the energy equation, and the Colebrook formula are satisfied. A series ofprogressively more complicated examples will demonstrate the method.Example 1 A simple example will introduce the Excel Solver tool and demonstrate how it canbe used to calculate f for a given Re and relative roughness. The friction factor is desired for Page 9.1108.2water flowing at 17 m3/s through a concrete pipe with a diameter of 2.75 m. Referring to Figure Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2004, American Society for Engineering Education1, inputs
science web site) 2. A background in “Usability” as applied to software interfaces and web site design. This was key to designing the interface of the simulations.We want the teacher to participate in the details of creating a web site s that they have theexperience of creating web-based educational material. Therefore, we provide instructionin the use of Microsoft FrontPage™, a software tool used in the creation of web sites.This tool was chosen because it was already available on the campus network. Also, wewant the participating teachers to be able to evaluate the large amount of multimediamaterial that is available for their use on the Internet.Virtual LaboratoriesRecently, much has been done to create Virtual
. Page 9.437.10 “Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2004, American Society for Engineering"VI AcknowledgementSome of the work presented herein was partially funded by the NSF Engineering EducationDivision Grant EEC-0314875 entitled “Multi-Semester Interwoven Project for Teaching BasicCore STEM Material Critical for Solving Dynamic Systems Problems”. The authors aregrateful for the support obtained from NSF to further engineering education.VI References1) Starrett,S., Morcos,M., “Hands-On, Minds-On Electric Power Education”, Journal of Engineering Education, Vol 90, No. 1, pp93-100, January 20012) Pavelich,M.J., “Integrating Piaget’s
reports to sponsors andso on. What is then appropriate for Engineering Technology? We cannot establish ourselves asan independent discipline if we don’t have our own set of best practices in dissemination ofscholarship but continue following what our colleague s in other areas, mainly engineering do.Engineering has used publication in peer reviewed journals and in conference proceedings as thetraditional methods to disseminate the scholarship in their discipline. Is Engineering Technologyfollowing the steps of Engineering? Should we consider the same dissemination procedures? Orshould we consider –and accept- other methods of dissemination? If we are accepting differentdissemination methods, will all have the same value? Or will we weight
Session 1455 Enabling the U.S. Engineering Workforce to Perform: Building Organizational Sustainability for Innovation in Professional Graduate Engineering Education S. J. Tricamo,1 D. R. Depew,2 A. L. McHenry,3 D. D. Dunlap,4 D. A. Keating,5 T. G. Stanford 5New Jersey Institute of Technology 1 / Purdue University 2/ Arizona State University East 3 Western Carolina University 4 / University of South Carolina 5 AbstractThis is the second paper in the panel session of the National
course work when circumstances occur such that course material is similar in contentto their past experiences, preparations, or similar in content to a corporate or military levelskill competency. Page 9.38.10REFERENCESAnnenberg/CPB Project and PBS Adult Learning Service.Bates, A. W. (Ed.). (1984). The role of technology in distance education. New York: St. Martins Press.Dillon, C. L., Walsh, S. M. (1992). Faculty: The neglected resource in distance education. The American Journal of Distance Education, 6(3).Distance Learning, http://www.westga.edu/~distance/main11.htmlGarrison, D. R. Shale, D. (1990). Education at a distance: From issues to
1387 Using the Systems Engineering Method to Design A System Engineering Major at the United States Air Force Academy J. E. Bartolomei, S. L. Turner, C. A. Fisher United States Air Force Academy USAF Academy CO 80840 (719) 333-2531Abstract:In response to an articulated customer need for more engineering graduates who can “think insystems engineering terms,” the United States Air Force Academy recently began the process ofdeveloping a new undergraduate academic major in systems engineering
Tanyel is a professor of engineering at Geneva College. He teaches upper level electrical engineering courses.Prior to Geneva College, Dr. Tanyel taught at Dordt College, Sioux Center, IA from Aug. 1995 to Aug. 2003. Priorto 1995, he was at Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA where he worked for the Enhanced Educational Experience 4for Engineering Students (E ) project, setting up and teaching laboratory and hands-on computer experiments forengineering freshmen and sophomores. For one semester, he was also a visiting professor at the United ArabEmirates University in Al-Ain, UAE where he helped set up an innovative introductory engineering curriculum. Dr.Tanyel received his B. S. degree in electrical engineering from
robust data management system in the future.Database ManagementIBM developed Structured Query Language (SQL) in the late 1970’s and is currently thestandard language used for database communication [7]. SQL statements are used which allowthe user to define and manipulate the data in the database. Data retrieval, and other editing taskssuch as adding, deleting of data and updating of data, is performed through SQL statements.Open Data Base Connectivity (ODBC) is an Application Programming Interface (API) whichallows a program access to a database. Regardless of the database type being used, all calls madeto the ODBC API. This application currently uses Microsoft Access as a database, but couldeasily be shifted to any other since SQL and ODBC work
6. www.taftan.com/thermodynamics/ 7. Gramoll, K., “Teaching Statics Online with only Electric Media on Laptop Computers,” Proceedings of the 1999 American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition (CD-ROM), 1999. 8. Gramoll, K. and Abbanat, R., “Interactive Multimedia for Engineering Dynamics,” Proceedings of the 1995 American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition (CD-ROM), 1995. 9. St. Clair, S. W. and Baker, N. C., “Pedagogy and Technology in Statics,” Proceedings of the 2003 American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition (CD-ROM), 2003. 10. NOVA development corporation, “Art Explosion”.BiographyMEIRONG
environmentalimpact of engineering. Inclusion of these soft skills into an already packed engineeringcurriculum can be difficult. One approach that appears to be effective at helping students developthe soft skills without compromising the acquisition of technical knowledge is service-learning.Service-learning is a form of project based experiential learning where the students are engagedin an activity that meets the specific needs of a community or nonprofit organization. Whencorrectly implemented, both the service and educational objectives are met. Service-learning hasbeen incorporated with varying degrees of success into many courses and/or curriculum in manyuniversities across the United States since the late 1980’s .1-3 However, only a small fraction
when they solve these examples since often verycomplicated problem may have a very simple solution(s). In addition to regular teachingassignments, there are many informal teaching opportunities that arise in which creativity andinnovation can be injected into the curriculum. Most notably, capstone design courses can beeasily utilized for creative thinking to produce quality projects, provided that the instructor andthe project advisor are willing to devote a significant amount of time to advising the student teammembers.Creativity is a process of generating and manifesting a new idea1. This idea may come in secondsand goes with the winds in seconds unless it is recorded and explored. On the other hand,innovation is taking creative ideas into