, technology, engineering and mathematics,” Int. Entrep. Manag. J., vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 1–15, Mar. 2020, doi: 10.1007/s11365-020-00642-5.[38] F. Beal, Double Jeopardy: To Be Black and Female. New York, New American Library: The Black woman: An anthology, 1970.[39] S. M. Malcolm, P. Q. Hall, and J. W. Brown, “The Price of Being a Minority Woman in Science,” presented at the American Association, 1976.[40] M. Knight, “Race-ing, Classing and Gendering Racialized Women’s Participation in Entrepreneurship,” Gend. Work Organ., vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 310–327, 2016, doi: 10.1111/gwao.12060.[41] E. O. McGee and L. Bentley, “The troubled success of Black women in STEM,” Cogn. Instr., vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 265–289, 2017.[42] L. J
. Livingstone, D. Ramirez, E. B. Barko, and A. L. Johnson, “Racial Identity and Body Image Among Black Female College Students Attending Predominately White Colleges,” Sex Roles, vol. 63, no. 9–10, pp. 697–711, 2010, doi: 10.1007/s11199-010-9862-7.[41] S. Mir, “Not Too ‘College-Like,’ Not Too Normal: American Muslim Undergraduate Women’s Gendered Discourses,” Anthropol. Educ. Q., vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 237–256, 2009, doi: 10.1111/j.1548-1492.2009.01043.x.[42] L. D. Patton and S. L. Simmons, “Exploring Complexities of Multiple Identities of Lesbians in a Black College Environment,” Negro Educ. Rev., vol. 59, pp. 197–215, 2008.[43] V. Purdie-Vaughns and R. P. Eibach, “Intersectional invisibility: The distinctive
outcomes that correspond to the undergraduate pathway (i.e., receiving andresponding). Table 2. SEE course: Bloom’s taxonomy cognitive student outcomes (Q: video quiz, WS: in-class worksheet, HW: weekly homework). Student Assessment type Assessment type Demonstrated ability (Comprehension) outcomes (Knowledge) Identify basic concepts and methods in solving civil and environmental Knowledge engineering problems from a systems
over the 11 subject matter expert presentations. Students were guided in career and degreediscovery as well as their exploration of: • How is COVID affecting major industries and the media? • How do we separate space fact from fiction? • What are the directives for NASA’s Human Exploration Missions? • How are meteorite samples curated and classified? • What is NASA’s Moon to Mars mission? • How do meteors provide clues to Earth’s past? • What are basic star formations and how are they formed?The internship concluded with student research teams presenting their projects to an audience of UT scientists andengineers, as well as other interns and their guests via a live Zoom webinar and Q&A. Over the
gender in engineering," Social studies of science, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 759-792, 2000.[18] W. Faulkner, "Nuts and Bolts and People' Gender-Troubled Engineering Identities," Social studies of science, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 331-356, 2007.[19] M. Q. Patton, Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods, 2nd. ed ed. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, 1990.[20] "Essential Project Design Elements Checklist." https://cpb-us- w2.wpmucdn.com/wp.wpi.edu/dist/e/220/files/2017/06/Essential-Project-Design- Elements-Checklist.pdf (accessed July 2, 2020).[21] L. A. Gelles, S. M. Lord, G. D. Hoople, D. A. Chen, and J. A. Mejia, "Compassionate Flexibility and Self-Discipline: Student Adaptation to Emergency Remote
. 144–152, 2013.[10] I. Drewelow, “Exploring graduate teaching assistants’ perspectives on their roles in a foreign language hybrid course,” System, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 1006–1022, 2013.[11] J. Paulsen and A. C. McCormick, “Reassessing Disparities in Online Learner Student Engagement in Higher Education,” Educ. Res., vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 20–29, 2020.[12] K. Sobel, S. Avery, and I. J. Ferrer-Vinent, “Teaching Them to Teach: Programmatic Evaluation of Graduate Assistants’ Teaching Performance,” Public Serv. Q., vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 189–213, 2016.[13] B. C. O. Neal, M. Wright, T. Perorazio, and J. Purkiss, “The Impact of Teaching on Student Retention in the Sciences,” 2002.[14] B. Melton and Y. Bodur, “Effects of a
, M.H. Cho, C.L. Tsai, and R. Marra, “Unpacking online learning experiences:Online learning self-efficacy and learning satisfaction,” Internet and Higher Education, vol. 19,no. 2013, pp. 10-17, 2013, doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.04.001[10] Q. Kreth, M.E. Spirou, S. Budenstein, and J. Melkers, “How prior experience and self-efficacy shape graduate student perceptions of an online learning environment in computing,”Computer Science Education, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 357-381, 2019.[11] B.H. Chaney, J.M. Eddy, S.M. Dorman, L. Glessner, B. L. Green, and R. Lara-Alecio,“Development of an instrument to assess student opinions of the quality of distance educationcourses. American Journal of Distance Education, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 145–164, 2007,doi.org/10.1080
. Available at https://www.sae.org/learn/education[11] TeachEngineering. STEM Curriculum for K-12. Available at https://www.teachengineering. org/[12] T. R. Kelley and E. Sung. Examining elementary school students’ transfer of learning through engineering design using think-aloud protocol analysis. Journal of Technology Education. 28(2): 83-108, 2017.[13] M. Alemdar, J. D. Gale, Je. Lingle, S. Newton, R. Moore, J. H. Rosen, and M. Usselman. Students' Perceptions of a Middle School STEM Innovation and Design Course. American Society for Engineering Education, 2017.[14] J. Tafoya, Q. Nguyen, C. Skokan, and B. Moskal. K-12 Outreach in an Engineering Intensive University. American Society for Engineering Education
workplace cultures. II. Gender in/authenticity and the in/visibility paradox,” Eng. Stud., vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 169–189, Nov. 2009, doi: 10.1080/19378620903225059.[8] K. Crenshaw, “Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of Color,” Stanford Law Rev., vol. 43, no. 6, pp. 1241–1299, 1991.[9] P. H. Collins, Black feminist thought : knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. New York ; London : Routledge, 2000., 2000.[10] J. S. Jordan-Zachary, “Am I a Black Woman or a Woman Who is Black?: Thoughts on the Meaning of Intersectionality,” Polit. Gend., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 254–263, 2007.[11] S. M. Malcolm, P. Q. Hall, and J. W. Brown, The double bind: the price of being a minority
. Higher Educ., vol. 59, pp. 1059-1073, 2018.[12] Z. S. Wilson, S. Y. McGuire, P. A. Limbach, M. P. Dowyle, L. G. Marzilli, and I. M. Warner, “Diversifying science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM): an inquiry into successful approaches in chemistry,” J. Chem. Educ., vol. 91, pp. 1860- 1866, 2014.[13] J. Frechtling, User-friendly handbook for project evaluations. Washington DC: National Science Foundation. Division of Research and Learning in Formal and Informal Settings. 2010.[14] M. Q. Patton, Utilization-focused evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2008.[15] G. L. Rose, “Enhancement of mentor selection using the ideal mentor scale,” Res. Higher Educ., vol. 44, no. 4, pp
response to being actively engaged in the classroom," PNAS, vol. 116, no. 39, 2019.[11] D. Pistrui, J. K. Layer and S. L. Dietrich, "Mapping the behaviors, motives, and professional competencies of entrepreneurially minded engineers in theory and practice: an empirical investigation," in Preceedings: American Society for Engineering Education, San Antonio, TX, 2012.[12] R.S. Harichandran, N. O. Erdil, M.-I. Carnasciali, C. Q. Li and A. R. Rana, "EML Indices to Assess Student Learning through Integrated e-Learning Modules," in Proceedings: American Society of Engineering Education, Tampa, FL, 2019.[13] B.J. LaMeres, "Deploying Adaptive Learning Environments to Overcome Background Deficiences and Facilitate Mastery of
. Undergraduate Civil Engineering Students,” in Proceedings of the 2018 Australasian Association for Engineering Education Conference, 2018, p. 7.[8] M. V Svyantek, “Missing from the Classroom: Current Representations of Disability in Engineering Education,” in Proceedings of the 123rd American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, 2016, p. 7.[9] M. F. Olney and K. F. Brockelman, “The impact of visibility of disability and gender on the self-concept of university students with disabilities,” J. Postsecond. Educ. Disabil., vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 80–91, 2005.[10] M. H. Fitzgerald, “‘You Look So Well’ The Multiple Facets of Hidden Disabilities,” Disabil. Stud. Q., vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 254
to feel confident and valuedwithin academic spaces, giving them a sense of reprieve and a greater capacity to persist in theiracademic and career goals.EMPOWERING STEM PERSISTENCE AMONG GRADUATE WOMEN 17 ReferencesAlexander, Q. R., & Hermann, M. A. (2015). African-American women's experiences in graduate science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education at a Predominantly White University: A qualitative investigation. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education. Advance online publication. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0039705Anderson, A. J., Sánchez, B., Reyna, C., & Rasgado-Flores, H. (2020). "It just weighs in the
Mental Illness,” Stigma Res Action, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 3–10, Jan. 2011, doi:10.5463/sra.v1i1.9.[24] O. Eylem et al., “Stigma for common mental disorders in racial minorities and majorities a systematicreview and meta-analysis,” BMC Public Health, vol. 20, no. 1, p. 879, Jun. 2020, doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-08964-3.[25] F. Gary, “Stigma: Barrier to mental health care among ethnic minorities.,” Issues in mental health nursing,vol. 26, pp. 979–99, Jan. 2006, doi: 10.1080/01612840500280638.[26] E. C. Wong, R. L. Collins, J. Cerully, R. Seelam, and B. Roth, “Racial and Ethnic Differences in MentalIllness Stigma and Discrimination Among Californians Experiencing Mental Health Challenges,” Rand Health Q,vol. 6, no. 2, Jan. 2017, Accessed
, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.7771/2157-9288.1185[28] Goonatilake, R., & Bachnak, R. (2012). Promoting Engineering Education among High School and Middle School Students. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and …, 13(1), 15–21. http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&btnG=Search&q=intitle:Promoting+Engineering+ Education+Among+High+School+and+Middle+School+Students#0[29] Knezek, G., & Christensen, R. (2020). Project-based learning for middle school students monitoring standby power: replication of impact on stem knowledge and dispositions. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(1), 137–162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09674-3[30] Mohr-Schroeder, M. J., Jackson, C., Miller, M
engineering design,” ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo. Conf. Proc., 2013.[3] C. Garibay and R. M. Teasdale, “Equity and Evaluation in Informal STEM Education,” New Dir. Eval., vol. 2019, no. 161, pp. 87–106, 2019.[4] B. Williams, J. Figueiredo, and J. Trevelyan, Engineering Practice in a Global Context. 2013.[5] R. E. Dunlap and K. D. Van Liere, “The ‘new environmental paradigm,’” J. Environ. Educ., vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 10–19, 1978.[6] A. Byars-Winston, “Toward a framework for multicultural STEM-focused career interventions,” Career Dev. Q., vol. 62, no. 4, pp. 340–357, 2014.[7] C. Kivunja and A. B. Kuyini, “Understanding and Applying Research Paradigms in Educational Contexts,” Int. J. High. Educ., vol. 6, no. 5, p
gets better with time. Virtual experience makes it harder to collaborate (1 mention) o Not able to share opinion with the project members when we need them instead we focus on our part only which is a good thing but it motivates knowing what others thinking. Other challenges (3 items) o Request the data needed to create an accurate model o The most difficult challenge to my research is making sure that the Deep Q learning programs are debugged and properly rebuilt. o Technical difficulties sometimes Not anticipating any challenges (1 mention) o I don't really think anything would be challenging.What differences do
, q. Seeking information physics and chemistry. r. Sketching Synthesizing s. TestingSatisfaction with the Project t. Understanding the problem u. Using creativity 9. I am happy with my
). Specifically, they valued practicalexamples of how to be more receptive, what to do in problematic situations, how to respond tobias, as well as the ‘coming out’ activity (3). 5.1.4. Recommendations for improvement to Safe Zone Level 1 workshopsSeveral respondents indicated that the conference workshops did not offer sufficient time (12).One suggestion, if scheduling for longer workshops is not possible, was to have the option ofparticipants to voluntarily stay afterwards for more discussion and Q&A, at the discretion of thefacilitator. Further suggestions for improvements of future Safe Zone workshops were to providehandouts as a packet at the beginning of the session (note: that was the norm but it’s possiblethat a facilitator forgot
D: Student infographic examples - Example infographic posters from fall and winterquarters. The infographic with the most votes among their peers in each section for the fallquarter is reflected below in Figures D1-D3. The winter quarter top vote earners are shown inFigures D4-D5. Figure D1: Infographic on Peer Learning from Monday section (Team D), F2016Figure D2: Infographic on Reading from Wednesday section (Team Q), F2016Figure D3: Infographic on Questioning from Friday section (Team II), F2016Figure D4: Infographic on Questioning from Tuesday section (Team 9), W2017Figure D5: Infographic on Questioning from Thursday section (Team 18), W2017Appendix E: Peer and instructor assessment of infographic examplesThe infographic rubric
:23, pp. 2914-2921, 2003.[39] G. B. Lesinski, S. Sharma, K. A. Varker, P. Sinha, M. Ferrari, and W. E. Carson, “Release of Biologically Functional Interferon-Alpha from a Nanochannel Delivery System,” Biomedical Microdevices, 7:1, 71-79, 2005. doi: 10.1007/s10544-005-6174-8[40] M. Wang, and S. Chen, “On Applicability of Poisson-Boltzmann Equation for Micro- and Nanoscale Electro-osmotic Flows,” Communications In Computational Physics, 3:5, pp. 1087-1099, 2008.[41] M. P. Sinha, and J. Houseman, “Miniature Mass Spectrometer for Chemical Sensing in Homeland Defense Applications,” Proceedings of SPIE, 5048:119, pp. 119-127, 2003.[42] M. Q. Patton, “Qualitative evaluation and research methods” (3rd ed.). Newbury Park, CA
.[20] Y. Kafai, D. Fields, and K. Searle, "Electronic textiles as disruptive designs: Supporting and challenging maker activities in schools," Harvard Educational Review, vol. 84, pp. 532-556, 2014.[21] D. Bertaux, Ed., Biography and Society: The Life History Approach in the Social Sciences. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1981, p.^pp. Pages.[22] A. Schutz, Phenomenology of the Social World. Chicago: Northwestern University Press, 1967.[23] M. Q. Patton, Qualitative evaluation methods. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1989.[24] D. Schuman, Policy analysis, education, and everyday life. Lexington, MA: Heath, 1982.
novice software designers. J Res Comput Educ. 2001;33(3):235 – 250.20. Scott JB. The Practice of Usability: Teaching User Engagement Through Service-Learning. Tech Commun Q. 2008;17(4):381–412. doi:10.1080/10572250802324929.21. Mohedas I, Daly SR, Sienko KH. Requirements development: approaches and behaviors of novice designers. J Mech Des. 2015.22. Mohedas I, Daly SR, Sienko KH. Design Ethnography in Capstone Design: Investigating Student Use and Perceptions. Int J Eng Educ. 2014;30(4):888–900.23. Creswell JW. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2013.24. Mohedas I, Daly SR, Sienko KH. Gathering and Synthesizing Information During
. Res. Math. Educ. 27, 215–240 (1996). 31. Li, Q. Beliefs and Gender Differences: A New Model for Research in Mathematics Education.Interchange 35, 423–445 (2004). 32. Smith, D., Bourne, P. & McCoy, L. Girls and schooling: their own critique. Resour. Fem. Res. 26,55–68 (1998). 33. Shapka, J. D. Trajectories of math achievement and perceived math competence over high schooland postsecondary education: effects of an all-girl curriculum in high school. Educ. Res. Eval. 15, 527–541 (2009). 34. Eccles, J. S. et al. Self-Concepts, Domain Values, and Self-Esteem: Relations and changes at earlyadolescence. J. Pers. 57, 283–310 (1989). 35. Frenzel, A. C., Goetz, T., Pekrun, R. & Watt
state and nextsteps. In A. Johri & B. M. Olds (Eds.) Handbook of Engineering Education Research (pp. 497-518). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. SanFrancisco: Jossey-BassNGSS Lead States (2013). Next Generation Science Standards: For States, By States.Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Tafoya, J., Nguyen, Q., Skokan, C., & Moskal, B. (2005). K-12 Outreach in an EngineeringIntensive University. In Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education AnnualConference & Exposition (ASEE).The National Research Council (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices,crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington
: Strategies for Product Design, 4th ed. West Sussex, England: Wiley, 2008.[34] N. Crilly, “Fixation and creativity in concept development: The attitudes and practices of expert designers,” Univ. Camb. Dep. Eng. Trumptington Str. Camb. CB2 IPZ UK.[35] E. P. Torrance, “Encouraging Creativity in the Classroom,” Duboque Iowa William C Brown Publ., 1970.[36] B. J. Lucas and L. F. Nordgren, “People underestimate the value of persistence for creative performance.,” J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., vol. 109, no. 2, pp. 232–243, 2015.[37] N. L. Leech and A. J. Onwuegbuzie, “An array of qualitative data analysis tools: A call for data analysis triangulation,” Sch. Psychol. Q., vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 57–584, Dec. 2007.
perceptions, whichwe believe warrant serious consideration when recruiting and designing programs for supportingtheir transition into higher education. ReferencesAgar, M. (1994). Language shock: Understanding the culture of conversation. William Morrow& Company.Bloome, D., Carter, S. P., Christian, B. M., Otto, S., & Shuart-Faris, N. (2004). Discourseanalysis and the study of classroom language and literacy events: A microethnographicperspective. Routledge.Bryk, A. S., Sebring, P. B., Allensworth, E., Easton, J. Q., & Luppescu, S. (2010). Organizingschools for improvement: Lessons from Chicago. University of Chicago Press.Castanheira, M. L., Crawford, T., Dixon, C. N., & Green, J. L. (2001
, aspects of teamwork, or work that is not deemed to use or be a direct precursor to CTconcepts (e.g. statistics). The pedagogical approach used a semi-flipped classroom whereinstudents are expected to engage in the materials and come to class prepared. The typicalsequence of assessment is shown in Figure 1 and as follows.Figure 1 Pedagogical overview of HFYE 1. Reading – The course is supported by an online textbook which includes programming exercises. Problems are assigned from the text book weekly. 2. Q&A – Each class starts with a question and answer session based on the readings to focus the class session. 3. Readiness Assessment Test (RAT) - Students take this initial quiz to assess their self- guided learning
argument. New York, NY: Cambridge UniversityPress.24. Moore, T. J., Glancy, A. W., Tank, K. M., Kersten, J. A., Smith, K. A., & Stohlmann,M. S. (2014). A framework for quality K-12 engineering education: Research anddevelopment. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research, 4(1), 1–13.25. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: SagePublications, Inc.26. Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (4th ed.). ThousandOaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.