experiences for undergraduates. SIGCSE Bull., 40(1):466–470, March 2008.[12] Dmitry Davidov, Roi Reichart, and Ari Rappoport. Superior and efficient fully unsupervised pattern-based concept acquisition using an unsupervised parser. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning, CoNLL ’09, pages 48–56, Stroudsburg, PA, USA, 2009. Association for Computational Linguistics.[13] Mary DeVito, Christine Hofmeister, Michael Jochen, and N. Paul Schembari. Undergraduate research in computer forensics. In Proceedings of the 2011 Information Security Curriculum Development Conference, InfoSecCD ’11, pages 61–68, New York, NY, USA, 2011. ACM.[14] John W. Eaton. GNU Octave. http://www.gnu.org
a member of the Phi Kappa Phi Honor Society and Vice-President and Treasurer of the Society of Engineering at TAMIU. In addition, Sof´ıa was a Research Assistant for the project ”Topography of an Object: Detection and Display (Software and Hardware)” and was team leader of the Engineering Senior Project Design entitled ”New Classroom Propulsion Demonstrator.”Dr. Fernando Garcia Gonzalez, Texas A&M International University Dr. Fernando Gonzalez is an Assistant Professor in the Engineering Math and Physics Department at Texas A&M International University in Laredo, Texas. He is currently involved in implementing a new undergraduate Systems Engineering degree program which includes selecting the curriculum
for future testing and further development ofOpenDSA.2. Tutorial ModulesTutorial modules tested in this study represent a tight integration of content, interactive exercis-es, and assessment. This presents an innovative way to improve the state of the art in AV andteaching of DSA, as no project previously has tried to integrate AVs with text and assessment tothis degree. A module roughly corresponds to a section (a couple of pages) in a traditional text-book. A typical semester course might include over 100 modules. The vision for the completedelectronic textbook is for modules and their prerequisite structure to define a directed graph thatmakes up a Knowledge Map. It will characterize a viable self-contained electronic textbook. In
all but one of theAmerican students, this was their first time visiting Germany. And likewise only one studenthad studied any German language. Thus, as with visiting any foreign country with a differentlanguage, the lack of knowledge of the native language is an immediate “cultural” shock. Ofcourse most German people are able to speak excellent English and do so with a friendly smile.Through integration of both German and American students into teams, each was able to learnabout the similarities and differences in their educational institutions and engineering curriculum.Even in the short time frame of the design course many friendships and connections between thestudents developed. The German team members were gracious hosts; frequently
interpretive research quality. Dr. Sochacka is also an active member of the Southern Region’s Water Policy and Economics (WPE) team where she lends a qualitative research perspective to ongoing projects concerning public attitudes, opinions and be- haviors regarding various water issues across the South East. In the instructional context, Dr. Sochacka’s two main interests focus on integrating the arts into undergraduate and graduate engineering education and the economics of sustainable development.Mrs. Kelly Woodall Guyotte, University of GeorgiaDr. Joachim Walther, University of Georgia Dr. Walther is an assistant professor of engineering education research at the University of Georgia (UGA). He is one of the leaders of
Paper ID #5859Beyond JEE: Finding publication venues to get your message to the ’right’audienceProf. Amy S. Van Epps, Purdue University, West Lafayette Amy S. Van Epps is an associate professor of Library Science and Engineering Librarian at Purdue Uni- versity. She has extensive experience providing instruction for engineering and technology students, in- cluding Purdue’s first-year engineering program. Her research interests include finding effective methods for integrating information literacy knowledge into the undergraduate engineering curriculum
with university resources, academic success skills, and engineeringproductivity tools, such as Excel. The seminar also aims to help students recognize when theyneed assistance and how to effectively seek help. Group activities encourage the developmentof team skills and facilitate the formation of study groups. Faculty and student mentor triadsare formed to further assist in the transfer process, providing an opportunity for directinteractions with faculty and upper-class students. Important lessons have been learned in theearly stages of the program.IntroductionMany students are not adequately prepared for the transfer from a two-year college to anengineering curriculum at a four-year institution.1 In 2011, a comprehensive program
. Page 23.1403.3The Northrop Grumman, Electronic Systems Leadership Training ProgramAs the 21st Century began on January 1, 2000, it was already evident, the “baby boomer”generation was fast approaching retirement age and there would soon be a shortage of engineers,scientists and corporate leaders. In 2003, Northrop Grumman Electronics Systems Engineering& Manufacturing Division at the Baltimore, Maryland location, in partnership with Learning andDevelopment (L&D), developed a unique approach to accelerate leadership development forrecent graduates by creating an experiential, eighteen-month Leadership Training Program(LTP). The core curriculum, known as the Foundations of Leadership, was a significant part ofthe experience and was
Page 23.245.4students into high and low academic GPA. While a letter grade of B equates to a 3.0, acumulative GPA of 2.5 was identified as the cut-off for high achieving students as thisGPA is the highest GPA requirement for entrance into an engineering discipline from thecommon freshman engineering curriculum. A low GPA is classified as less than 2.5 asthese students are prohibited from advancing through the curriculum in severaldepartments.FindingsWhen looking at the distribution of cumulative GPA’s of students who attrite, we foundthat 44% of students over a 3.0 and 67% over a 2.5 attrite from engineering. Additionally,we found that these students attrite between their second (first year, spring semester) andthird (second year, fall
, "Model of Integrating Humanitarian Development into Engineering Education," Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, April 2010.7 M. J. Prince and R. M. Felder, "Inductive teaching and learning methods: Definitions, comparisons, and research bases," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 95, no. 2, pp. 123-138, 2006.8 M. Borrego and J. Bernhard, "The emergence of engineering research as an internationally connected field of inquiry," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 100, no. 1, pp. 14-47, 2011.9 J. S. Brown, A. Collins and P. Duguid, "Situated cognition and the culture of learning," Educational Researcher, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 32-41, 1989
students integrate into the university and receive appropriateacademic advising.Because students do not declare majors when they apply for admission, every entering studentcompletes an advising questionnaire. This questionnaire asks students to identify three majorsthey are interested in pursuing. It also asks for preference for preceptorial classes and rankingsof other core classes. The questionnaires are used by faculty to create student schedules. Allstudents expressing any interest in engineering are scheduled by an engineering faculty memberto take an engineering preceptorial class. This is done even if engineering is listed as a student’sthird preference because demands of the engineering major necessitate having an engineeringadvisor. Most
experience with the electrical codes or in wiring elementarycircuits to code requirements. Four different trainer units were created to give students thehands-on opportunity to wire several common circuits. These units have standard 2x4 studconstruction. Wires are already run and boxes are already installed for the experiments at hand.In an integrated approach, students learn to make connections and test their circuits against code.Innovative methods of testing and display of the units are shown. Safety procedures arediscussed. Each university benefits from the lessons learned by the other. Assessments, bothformative and summative, are presented and are used for continuous improvement.IntroductionMany Electrical Engineering students go through their
. Page 23.412.2Therefore, the objectives of this project are to: (1) develop a Fundamentals of EnvironmentalEngineering Concept Inventory (FEECI) that quantifies students’ conceptual understanding ofkey FEE concepts, (2) administer the FEECI at 10 US universities with required undergraduateFEE courses, and (3) refine and disseminate the FEECI following its initial administration. Theexpected outcome of this work is a validated, reliable instrument for assessing conceptualunderstanding in a core curriculum course for Civil and/or Environmental engineering. Such aninstrument will play an important role in assessment for programmatic accreditation under theABET standards, and provide a needed technique for formative assessment of
, 2005; Rugarcia et al.,2000). In engineering programs, student outcome “h” of the Accreditation Board forEngineering and Technology’s (ABET) accreditation criteria specifies that engineers must have abroad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in an environmentaland societal context (ABET, 2012). The traditional engineering curriculum offers fewopportunities to truly integrate societal and cultural contexts into the design of engineeringsolutions, let alone international contexts. In conjunction with an Engineers without Borders (EWB) student chapter, the second andthird authors of this paper led a study abroad program with a significant service learningcomponent in a remote mountain village in Peru in
University of Idaho, the Land-Grant College for the State of Idaho, and worked as an engineer in design offices and at construction sites.Dr. Michael Puddicombe, Norwich University Page 23.1175.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013The Confluence of Information:Teambuilding is not enough to produce successful interdisciplinary teamsIntroductionMulti-disciplinary collaboration is recognized as a requirement for superior performance in therealization of projects in the built environment1. However, due to their different “thoughtworlds,” collaboration between professionals from different
Paper ID #8385Invited Paper - Engineering for the Americas (EftA)Dr. Reginald Vachon P.E., American Society of Mechanical Engineers Dr. Vachon , an engineer with a physics background and business executive, has served in the US Army and was a chaired professor of mechanical engineering. He received his education at the US Naval Academy, Auburn University, Oklahoma State University and Jones Law School. He was the Chair of the American Association of Engineering Societies and is Vice President for North America for Pan American Union of Engineering Organizations (UPADI). He serves on the WFEO committee on relations with
classroom in an urbansuburb of a major Northeastern city as a part of the Student Teacher Outreach MentorshipProgram (STOMP) [20]. Mr. Walsh attended professional development as a part of the W-STOMP program [21], a one-year project that focused on women and girls, and chose to teachservice learning, a new curriculum for the STOMP program. The classroom consisted of 20students: 12 boys and eight girls. As part of the STOMP program, these lessons were given oncea week for an hour, and co-taught with the teacher by two university students, or STOMPfellows. Mr. Walsh directed the class and the STOMP fellows served as the engineering and Page
the dots between classroom learning and real worldapplications. We assessed this program informally during tests, projects, and an industry visitduring the first semester, and then formally via an online evaluation in the second semester of theprogram. This manuscript presents the outcome of the teaching mentorship experiment. Ourapproach could provide a pathway for new engineering faculty to become effective teachers andsuccessful mentors.I. Introduction and BackgroundThe 2lst century has seen a significant shift from bricks to clicks, from simultaneous to non-simultaneous engineering and communication cultures. 1-2 Traditional classrooms, in the walls ofbricks, have transformed with integration of software and design tools, digital
the Engineering Ambassador classroom visit was worthwhile 4.7110 The Engineering Ambassador presentation increased my understanding of the topic 4.2911 The Engineering Ambassador classroom visit increased my understanding of the work of engineers 4.1212 The Engineering Ambassador classroom visit made me think about engineering in a new way 3.9413 The content of the Engineering Ambassador classroom visit was relevant to the subject I teach 4.4714 The Engineering Ambassador classroom visit was relevant to the state curriculum standards 4.2415 The content of the Engineering Ambassador classroom visit was relevant to our local community 4.2416 An Engineering
; Norback, J. S. (2010). Refinement and Initial Testing of an Engineering Student Presentation Scoring System, American Society for Engineering Education Conference, Louisville, KY. 2. Norback, J. S., & Utschig, T. T. Student Perceptions of the Effectiveness of Workplace Communication Instruction in Capstone Design. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication. In prep. 3. Payne, D. & Blakely, B. eds. (2008). Multimodal Communication: Rethinking the Curriculum. 2004-2008, ISUComm at Iowa State University: Iowa City, IA. 4. Payne, D. & Blakely, B. eds. (2007). ISUComm Foundation Courses: Student Guide for English 150 and 250. ISUComm at Iowa State University: Iowa City, IA. 5. Carnegie
first limitation was thedistance between the end user and the student. Second, the view of only one COR was discussedin this paper, despite having 4 community partners involved in the project. Since the roles of theother organization members were more limited, their views were excluded. A further-reachingstudy could be conducted to assess the impact on the university students, 8th grade students, endusers, and other organization members. Finally, it is possible that the COR was perceivedprimarily as a faculty member rather than as the client, and a different community partner wouldhave had a larger impact.Further integration with the end user could be implemented. Ideally, an international SL projectincorporates the end user regularly to ensure
learning concepts byproviding tangible representations of common software engineering idioms and activities asevents within the game, such as when a piece of string snapping is equated to an interrupted ordropped network connection—this engages students in the game without resulting in loss ofacademic rigor in the treatment of the subject matter. This game-centric approach: (a) deeplyadopts insights from active learning, making students an integral part of the learning process, (b)provides a dynamic, simulation-like context that is well suited to the dynamic nature of software,and (c) is modular and easily adoptable within existing curricular structures.Initial evaluation efforts examine student attitudes and perceptions about the game by using
example of such a case is [33].AssessmentCapstone project deliverables are presented in Table 5 as an example distribution betweengraders for each component. This distribution is for the oral conference-style publicpresentation. For poster presentations the Moa and Mop would be combined.Table 5. Example Assessment Distribution for Capstone Projects Page 23.271.14Student feedback, engagement, and learning have been so positive to the Capstone Designexperience that XY University has implement cross-discipline projects and has begun work onvertical integration of design courses into the curriculum. The Capstone learning experience isso profound
systems and automatic control. Dr. Guo is a senior member of the IEEE and a member of the ASEE.Mr. Jingbo Han, Northern Illinois University Jingbo Han earned the M.S in Electrical Engineering from Northern Illinois University in 2010.Dr. Andrew W Otieno, Associate Professor Dr. Andrew W. Otieno is an associate professor in the Department of Technology at Northern Illinois Uni- versity. He holds a Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from Leeds University in the United Kingdom. Dr. Otieno has worked in various capacities at several institutions both in the United States and abroad. Since joining the Department of Technology, Dr. Otieno has actively participated in curriculum development. He has extensively revised and
Page 23.1251.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 To Be Green Or Not To Be Green? Ethical Tools for Sustainability EngineeringAbstractEngineers are increasingly being asked to design products and process that reduce the overallimpact society has on the environment as more people realize the rising need to developsustainable resources and to be responsible when using existing resources. In order to adequatelyprepare students to enter this ever increasing demand for sustainable engineering, students needto have an understanding of the technical needs of society as well as the human component indesign, be it the use of local resources, the lack of surplus
Paper ID #7827Problem Based Learning Through Modeling and Simulation of UnmannedVehiclesDr. Lifford McLauchlan, Texas A&M University, Kingsville Dr. Lifford McLauchlan completed his Ph.D. at Texas A&M University, College Station. After spending time in industry, he has returned to academia. He is an associate professor at Texas A&M University - Kingsville in the Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Department. His main research interests include controls, robotics, education, adaptive systems, intelligent systems, signal and image process- ing, biometrics and watermarking. He is the current chair of the
persistence in academic endeavors.7 Improvements in retention resultingfrom increases in connection to community are fundamentally supported by the higher educationmodel of social integration developed by Tinto, where student goals and commitments formed bypre-college attributes interact with their college experiences to indicate whether students arelikely to complete an academic program.8-10 Community also begets community; students whohave not experienced a strong sense of community (and belonging) in their undergraduateexperience are far less likely, in the long term, to take a critical community leadership role in Page 23.795.3industry. Moving
interactive video system to link thelaboratory to the classroom in real time. These tools are being integrated into junior and seniorlevel engineering courses, two community college courses and workshops for high schoolscience teachers.IntroductionLow enrollment and poor student performance in academic programs in engineering, science andmathematics support the somber conclusions recently published by The National Academies inRising Above The Gathering Storm, Revisited: Rapidly Approaching Category 5, an update to itsseminal 2005 publication of similar title [1]. The report raises the specter of an impending talentgap which could severely jeopardize U.S. industrial competitiveness. This is highlighted by thecomparison of the following trends in China
following ten years in Georgia Tech’s College of Computing where she was a member of the NSF-funded Learning By DesignTM Problem-Based Learning curriculum de- velopment and research project. She also conducted an NSF-funded ethnographic study of learning in a problem-driven, project-based bio-robotics research lab at Georgia Tech. In addition to her duties in BME, she is an advisor to the interdisciplinaryScience Learning: Integrating Design, Engineering, and Robotics (SLIDER) project.Mr. James William Schwoebel, Georgia Institute of TechnologyMr. Ethan James Craig, Georgia Institute of TechnologyMr. Anish Joseph, Georgia Institute of TechnologyAjit Vakharia, Georgia Institute of TechnologyProf. Steve M. Potter PhD, Georgia
, PhD is Innovation Professor in Engineering Education in the School of Aerospace, Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering at RMIT University. He is a civil engineer with 20 years involvement in leading change in engineering education, with a particular focus on problem/project-based learning (PBL), at RMIT, Monash and Melbourne Universities. Roger is an ALTC Discipline Scholar in Engineering and ICT, having co-developed the draft national academic standards for the discipline. He is currently Program Director for the Bachelor of Sustainable Systems Engineering and also works on curriculum issues across the College of Science, Engineering and Health at RMIT. He is a passionate advocate of national and international