AC 2007-557: IMPACTING INSTRUCTIONAL PRACTICE THROUGH THEIMPLEMENTATION OF AN INQUIRY-BASED ELEMENTARY MATHEMATICSPROGRAM: A SINGLE-SITE COLLECTIVE CASE STUDYSandra Linder, Math Out of the Box Sandra Linder is a graduate student at Clemson University working on her PhD in Curriculum and Instruction. Her research focuses on the pedegogical practices of early childhood and elementary educators.Donna Gunderson, Math Out of the Box/Clemson University Donna Gunderson is currently a research associate and curriculum developer at Clemson University for Math Out of the Box, a standards-based K-5 math curriculum
Administrative Sciences and Sociology at the Universities in Kiel, Bielefeld (Germany), and Lancaster (UK). Doctorate in Sociology from the University of Bielefeld. Worked from 1992-2000 with Academy for Technology Assessment in Baden-Wuerttemberg (Germany). Since 2000 professor for Technology Assessment and Social Science Innovation Management at University of Applied Sci- ences Darmstadt. From 2010 to 2013 Vice President for Research and Technology Transfer since 2012 Head of the Graduate School Darmstadt. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 The T-Shaped Engineer as an Ideal in Technology Entrepreneurship: Its Origins, History, and Significance for Engineering EducationFrom
on seniors’ interdisciplinary competence. Data on theemphasis on interdisciplinarity in the curriculum were collected from engineering faculty andstudents as part of a nationally-representative study of 31 colleges and universities (see Table 1).Survey DevelopmentA team of education and engineering researchers collaborated on the development of the survey-based instruments for engineering students, faculty, and administrators during a rigorous, two-year process. The team conducted an extensive literature review on key topics related tointerdisciplinarity in engineering, but also in fields outside engineering. In addition to studiescollected in ASEE’s conference proceedings and journals, team members identified andreviewed literature from the
educational basis for jurisdictional claims in relation to other professions ≠ Refine and expand the BOK through research Page 14.1252.7 ≠ Serve as the primary source of profession’s status and public identity ≠ Contribute to students’ commitment to the profession as a career ≠ Contribute to a shared identity and feeling of community among members of the professionOf all these purposes, Freidson places particular emphasis on the importance of research.Strengthening and expanding the BOK is seen as a critical tool for defending and expanding theprofession’s jurisdiction. In the civil engineering community, research is
is also an important educational objective. They need tounderstand that when they practice as engineers, the design knowledge they lack as studentsis readily accessible through networks of people built up over time with collaborativerelationships.3,6The third challenge is the lack of experienced teaching assistants. The emphasis on leadingedge engineering science research in engineering faculties has resulted in weak (if any)practical design knowledge among teaching staff and graduate students who would normallybe teaching assistants. Therefore, it is necessary to find designers residing nearby who havetime and inclination to contribute to educating students for relatively modest pay and also tonegotiate mutually satisfactory employment
, by the time they graduate, is turned into a blueprint for Sooner City's infrastructure [21].Among other things, the project promotes five outcomes not fully addressed by traditionalcurricula, but which are emphasized by the NSF Engineering Education Coalitions and ABET2000: team building, communication, leadership, design, and higher level learning skills. Page 10.72.1 “Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition. Copyright 2005, American Society for Engineering Education.”1.2 Project Philosophy.Students are taught to view engineering design as a
, NIDRR, VA, DOD, DOE, and industries including Ford and GM. Currently, Dr. Kim is the site director for the NSF Industry and University Cooperative Research Center (I/UCRC) for e-Design. Dr. Kim is an editorial board member of Journal of Integrated Design and Process Science. Dr. Kim received top cited article award (2005-2010) from Journal CAD and 2003 IIE Transactions Best Paper Award. Dr. Kim was a visiting professor at Kyung Hee University, South Korea from September 2013 to June 2014. Dr. Kim’s education includes a Ph.D. in Industrial Engineering from University of Pittsburgh.Carolyn E Psenka PhD, Wayne State University Carolyn Psenka, PhD is a cultural anthropologist with research interests focused on the study
discussions center around engineering ethical scenarios derived from theEngineering Ethics Reasoning Instrument (EERI) [10] developed at Purdue University, and ToxicWorkplaces: A Cooperative Ethics Card Game (developed by the researchers). The questionsposed to the student groups center around primary morality concepts such as integrity, conflictingobligations, and the contextual nature of ethical decision making. Please see [10] for the EERIquestions used (Nurse Schedule Software, Water Quality Testing) and [15] for details of the ToxicWorkplaces game. In order to recruit first-year engineering students at an accredited New England university,an announcement was made to their first-year course. From there, interested students filled out
(TIMSS), the USranked 18th among 21 industrialized nations also per TIMSS, surpassing only Lithuania, Cyprusand South Africa5. New information from the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Page 14.856.6Development which consists of 30 member countries shows that American 15 year olds haveactually lost ground in math and science compared to other member countries. In theorganizations latest studies, the highest achieving U.S. students were either at or below itsaverage across member nations. Almost 25 percent of U.S. students demonstrated very lowproficiency in science and 28 percent scored below the minimum level in mathematics. In math
bioengineers.” 1 To helpaccomplish VaNTH’s goals, students across VaNTH institutions established an outreachcomponent for the ERC, the Student Leadership Council.The Need for a Student Leadership Council VaNTH SLC engineering outreach to K-12 students is needed for several reasons. First,many K-12 teachers have not studied engineering principles, and therefore do not teach theseprinciples in their classrooms. 2 This means that most K-12 students are not exposed toengineering concepts until they enter undergraduate engineering programs. Outreach projectsinitiated by SLC students, however, can expose students to the field of bioengineering early.Second, the number of minorities graduating with engineering degrees is a small percentage ofthe
. (c) Active and collaborative learning: Students learn more when intensely involved in the educational process and are encouraged to apply their knowledge in many situations. (d) Supportive campus environment: Students perform better when their college is committed to their success and cultivates positive social relationships among different groups of people. (e) Enriching educational experiences: Learning opportunities inside and outside classroom (diversity, technology, collaboration, internships, community service, capstones) enhance learning.Both the ABET and the NSEE guidance emphasize the need for students to not only study, but topractice the application of their
, 10 – Sustainability, 11 – Contemporary Issues & History, 12 – Risk & Uncertainty, 17 – Public Policy, 18 – Business & Public Administration, 19 – Globalization, and 20 – Leadership). In addition, the committee identified Outcome 5 – Material Science and Outcome 24 – Professional & Ethics as ones that may be challenging for programs to fully implement. The discussion that follows explores these issues in the context of NC State. Institutional Profile North Carolina State University is a major, comprehensive, studentcentered research university. It was founded in 1887 and today enrolls over 33,000 students. The College of Engineering, with approximately 250 tenure/tenuretrack faculty in
Paper ID #42410Credit-Hour Analysis of Undergraduate Students Using Sequence DataTushar Ojha, University of New Mexico Tushar Ojha is a graduate (PhD) student in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at the University of New Mexico (UNM). His work is focused on researching and developing data driven methods that are tailored to analyzing/predicting outcomes in the higher education space. He works as a Data Scientist for the Institute of Design & Innovation (IDI), UNM.Don Hush, University of New Mexico Dr. Hush has worked as a technical staff member at Sandia National Laboratories, a tenure-track
AC 2012-5470: TRACKING DESIGN KNOWLEDGE IN ENGINEERINGSTUDENT PROJECTS AROUND COURSE MILESTONESDr. Sharad Vimal Oberoi, Carnegie Mellon University Sharad Oberoi completed his Ph.D. from the Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering at Carnegie Mellon University (CMU) in 2011. He is currently affiliated with the Institute for Complex Engineered Systems at CMU. His research interests include language in design, computer-supported cooperative learning, collaboration in design, and design education.Prof. Susan Finger, National Science Foundation Susan Finger is currently a Program Director in the Division of Undergraduate Education at the National Science Foundation. She is on leave from Carnegie Mellon
Learning Figure 3. Percentage of participants with scores between 4 and 5 in each cellAnother trend found from our initial survey results is the tendency of students to have strongerknowledge in the areas of Attitude, Operational Skills and Interactions. That is, they aregenerally positive and explorative towards technology; they are able to operate basictechnologies reasonably well, and they know how to take advantage of the communicationalbenefits from new technologies (such as emails, forums, and instant messaging tools). However,fewer students have extensively used technology to promote cooperative and active learning toits highest capacity. This finding might suggest that some adjustment is to be made to the waywe teach students so
. 15874].The U.S. DOE is also inspiring university students to engage in sustainable building designthrough a program called Race to Zero, which is an annual competition focused on the design ofZEB buildings (housing or elementary school). The Race to Zero student design competition isopened to graduate and undergraduate students from any interested program of differentinstitutions worldwide [9].Competitions can be an effective tool for student engagement and collaboration, but it canpresent some drawbacks or challenges for students, such as worsened academic performance,disappointment and stress [10]. It is important to emphasize that even defeat can benefitcompetition participants, because they will learn from real-world experiences, dealing
an urban, comprehensive, research-intensive, public institution with over 40,000students. The program was executed in its College of Engineering and Applied Science (CEAS),which has over 3,000 undergraduate and 650 graduate students, and grants B.S./M.S./Ph.D.degrees in 9 Engineering disciplines (Aerospace, Architecture, Biomedical, Chemical, Civil,Computer, Electrical, Environmental, and Mechanical), a B.S./M.S./Ph.D. in Computer Science,and B.S. degrees in 6 Engineering Technology programs (Architecture, ConstructionManagement, Electrical, Fire and Safety, and Mechanical). All CEAS degree programs are fiveyears in duration, because of a mandatory paid cooperative (co-op) education requirement.Through co-op, students alternate semesters of
acting as a moderator (webcam + mic on), while the otherPI (webcam+mic off) took field notes. The participants were required to keep their webcams andmicrophones on for the duration of the discussions. The discussion subject matter for this studyis derived from ethical scenarios that are available in the literature, including two scenarios takenfrom the Engineering Ethical Reasoning Instrument (EERI) titled “Nurse Scheduling Software”and “Water Quality Testing” [11] and two from Toxic Workplaces: A Cooperative Ethics CardGame, titled “O-no rings” and “Lose the Ooze”, developed by the research team [12]. Each ofthe scenarios placed the students in the role of an professional engineer (Toxic Workplaces) orengineering student (EERI) faced with an
contexts. By the end of thesemester students are expected to be able to: (a) utilize the internet as a valuable tool inconducting research; (b) construct mind-maps as an effective tool to organizeinformation; (c) set short-term and long-term goals and strategies; (d) take effectivenotes; (e) describe the different engineering disciplines; (f) solve technical problemsusing an effective problem-solving technique; (g) use an engineering design problem-solving schema for open ended design problems; (h) describe the value-laden nature ofthe engineering profession; (i) define and describe moral reasoning theories used inengineering contexts; (j) develop writing skills required to argue for an ethical position orperspective; (k) use effectively standard
this collaboration project, the middle school is one of the NASA Explorer Schools in ametropolitan area. Having one astronaut graduated from this middle school, the whole school isvery proud of being involved in exploring the space. Both the administrators and teachers aredoing their best to broaden students’ view towards the outer space. As one example, eachsummer, they send students to NASA for training and competition. The school’s explorer club(roughly enrollment of 60 students per semester), usually meet after classes and work on variousscience project throughout the whole school year. Recently, they connected to space station andtalked to astronaut in real time. Students were able to ask their own interested questions directlyto
higher education in Liberia for approximately 11 years. He currently serves as a Graduate Research Assistant in the Department of Engineering Education at VT. His research interests are: Immi- grants in STEM, migration and immigration issues in education, and Quality Assurance.Mr. Abram Diaz-Strandberg, Virginia Tech Department of Engineering Education American c Society for Engineering Education, 2020Understanding Students’ perceptions of Dimensions of Engineering Culture in EcuadorAbstractThe purpose of this study is to explore how engineering students perceive different dimensionsassociated with culture. We are using Hofstede’s theory of
prepares Engineering/Technology candidates for teacher licensure. Dr. Mentzer’s educational efforts in pedagogical content knowledge are guided by a research theme centered in student learning of engineer- ing design thinking on the secondary level. Nathan was a former middle and high school technology educator in Montana prior to pursuing a doctoral degree. He was a National Center for Engineering and Technology Education (NCETE) Fellow at Utah State University while pursuing a Ph.D. in Curriculum and Instruction. After graduation he completed a one year appointment with the Center as a postdoctoral researcher.Dr. Allison Godwin, Purdue University, West Lafayette Allison Godwin, Ph.D. is an Assistant Professor of
Single Sex Debate for Girls in Science: A Comparison BetweenTwo Informal Science Programs on Middle School Students’ STEM Identity Formation. Research in Science Education, 43(5),1979–2007. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-012-9345-7Kemp, R.L. (2005). The impact of gender-specific and mixed-gender cooperative groups on female gifted students usingcomputer-assisted, problem-based learning. A thesis submitted to the Graduate School, Valdosta State University. In partialfulfillment of requirements for the degree of Education Specialist in Instructional Technology in the Department ofCurriculum and Instructional Technology of the College of Education. Retrieved fromhttp://chiron.valdosta.edu/are/vol4no1/pdf/kemprarticle.pdfKim, J. (2011). Modeling
notconsidered by current literature. For instance, research could involve Indigenousunderrepresented populations from the American continent to explore nuanced factors that impactcollege choice. Socioeconomic factors, representativeness, public policies, geographic location,access to pre-college education resources, or even segregation or racism from others with accessto educational resources influence in different or similar ways to marginalized populations fromthe Andes or Mesoamerica. Studying college choice among aboriginal populations may not onlybe within this continent but also expand its exploration to other locations from Africa or Oceania.The reason is that non-representative populations may be affected by similar variables, whereinternal
to search, what is considered a highly cited paper in the field, and whatis acceptable to cite in terms of sources. It was noted by one faculty that a standalone researchmethods course was not offered in their department for graduate students, which they viewed asa “deficiency.” A different faculty member admitted, “I don’t know why I don’t ask you [theengineering librarian] to come [to class to speak] now that I think about it.” Another stated thatwhile they do require scholarly research and literature reviews in their graduate courses, they donot discuss assessing the quality of the references the students find.The Impact of COVID-19 on the Teaching Needs of Engineering FacultyBeyond electronic access to library materials and resources
is also a Diplomate Water Resources Engineer (D.WRE). He is an elected Fellow of American Society of Civil Engineers (F.ASCE). His pas- sion for teaching continues for over 15 years since his graduate school. He has been active with ASEE and engineering education research for over 15 years. He is interested in enhancing critical thinking skills among civil engineering students through various approaches and understanding student perceptions and experiences about high-impact learning activities and teaching strategies. His research interests are in the areas of resource-efficient desalination, resource recovery from used water, renewable biofuels, and sustainability.Dr. Benjamin S. Magbanua Jr., Mississippi State
, informed reasoning about what to do next is akey component of engineering design cognition (for a review, see Crismond & Adams, 2012).The Next Generation Science Standards ask K-12 students to learn the practices of engineeringdesign (NRC, 2013), the backbone of which is collaborative and reflective decision-making.Therefore K-12 students need opportunities to carry out reflective decision-making, andeducating “the reflective practitioner” (Schön, 1987) could be considered the implicit aim of pre-college engineering education. In our research program, we explore the nature of reflectivedecision-making in elementary school engineering design. We examine students’ collaborativeengineering discourse for evidence of reflective decision-making. In
thancompetition in the promotion of learning. Some researchers view cooperative and collaborativelearning as having two distinct historical developments and differing philosophicalroots.(23)Despite differences and similarity of the two approaches (collaborative vs. cooperative),the fact remains that the core element of both, is the emphasis on student interactions, as theprimary source of learning, rather than learning as individuals.Problem-based learning (PBL) is an instructional method where relevant problems areintroduced during the course to provide the context and motivation for the learning thatfollows.(24) PBL, by and large, is self-directed learning that helps develop positive studentattitudes, foster a deeper approach to learning, and helps
questioning by the instructor.8. Students using this process usually work in cooperative or collaborative groups to gain multiple perspectives on possible solutions.Table 1: Critical Attributes of Problem-Based Education1. Since learning occurs in an environment similar to that in which the students will work, the problem-solving skills they learn will be more easily transferable to that work environment.2. Students no longer learn facts, skills and concepts as separate entities, but instead see how these can be interconnected to solve real problems.3. Students develop their own unique problem-solving skills which allow them to reason through ambiguous situations in which solutions are not easily obtained.4. Students are more easily able
Paper ID #28751Two Student Workshops on Identifying and Resolving Teamwork ConflictDr. Rania Al-Hammoud P.Eng., University of Waterloo Dr. Al-Hammoud is a Faculty lecturer (Graduate Attributes) in the department of civil and environmental engineering at the University of Waterloo. Dr. Al-Hammoud has a passion for teaching where she con- tinuously seeks new technologies to involve students in their learning process. She is actively involved in the Ideas Clinic, a major experiential learning initiative at the University of Waterloo. She is also re- sponsible for developing a process and assessing graduate attributes at the