making written communication skills part of the grading process in several laboratories. This was implemented and the results were tracked via the employer evaluations of the outcome over time. The result is shown in Figure 1. The figure shows that the employer evaluations of the student preparedness in written communications increased for several years and then leveled off. As a result, it was determined that more could be done by adding more opportunities for evaluation and feedback on student written work. Toward that end, writing was integrated into the mechanical design
mechanical engineering at Virginia Tech for over 35 years. His current research focuses on the development and use of new in- strumentation for measuring heat transfer. Applications include high-temperature unsteady flows, such as found in gas turbine engines and for non-invasively measuring blood perfusion in the human body. He continues to work to transition research results to industrial and laboratory applications and has published well over one hundred papers in areas encompassing heat transfer, fluid flow, biomedical engineering and instrumentation. He teaches both undergraduate and graduate heat transfer courses with approximately 300 students per year. This encompasses computer usage in class and active learning
–150.[7] M. E. Califf and M. Goodwin, “Testing Skills and Knowledge: Introducing a Laboratory Exam in CS1,” in Proc. 33rd SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, New York, NY, USA, 2002, pp. 217–221.[8] J. Mead, S. Gray, J. Hamer, R. James, J. Sorva, C. S. Clair, and L. Thomas, “A Cognitive Approach to Identifying Measurable Milestones for Programming Skill Acquisition,” in Working Group Reports on ITiCSE on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, New York, NY, USA, 2006, pp. 182–194.[9] R. Klein-Collins, “Sharpening our focus on learning: The rise of competency-based approaches to degree completion,” National Institute for Learning Outcomes Assessment, Occasional
budget, knowledge, time, and available technology; Design in the arts: to solve a problem in human expression within the bounds of time, budget, skills, knowledge, and available technology. 4. Create and maintain a weekly journal that records the design and development processes (this journal serves a purpose analogous to an engineering laboratory notebook). 5. Meet periodically with engineering faculty to talk about the aesthetic design process and how it appears to relate to engineering design. 6. Create drafts or preliminary versions of the work of art. 7. Create a final version of the work and attend its display, performance, or exhibition. 8. Create a video explaining what was done and
Mechanical Systems: A Capstone Course in Mechanical Engineering Design,” ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition (ASEE 1984), pp. 803-807.5. Todd, R. H., S. P. Magleby, C. D. Sorensen, B. R. Swan and D. K Anthony, “A Survey of Capstone Engineering Courses in North America,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 84, no. 2, 1995, pp. 165-174.6. Banios, E. W., “Teaching Engineering Practices,” Proceedings, 1992 Frontiers in Education Conference, IEEE, 1992, pp. 161-168.7. Todd, R. H., C. D. Sorensen, and S. P. Magleby, “Designing a Senior capstone Course to Satisfy Industrial Customers,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 82, no. 2, 1993, pp. 92-100.8. Rochefort, S., “An Innovative ChE Process Laboratory,” Chemical Engineering Education
students. The course istaught by an assistant professor in the civil engineering department specializing in structural andmaterials engineering. The students met in a small classroom (20 student capacity) located in thecivil engineering teaching laboratory once per week for one hour and twenty minutes. Theclassroom was equipped with four large tables capable of seating up to five students, fourcomputers, a projector, and a 3D printer. Each computer was equipped with Microsoft Office®AutoCad®, STAADPro® and PASCO®. The students were provided with weekly lecturematerial via PowerPoint presentations and embedded video tutorials. All lecture material andproject descriptions were made available to the students four to five days prior to the lecture.The
of Engineering Education Annual Conference. Pittsburgh, PA. (2008).6 Chi, M. T. H., Feltovich, J. & Glaser, R. Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. . Cognitive Science 5, 121-152 (1983).7 Kozma, R. B., Chin, E., Russell, J. & Marx, N. The roles of representations and tools in the chemistry laboratory and their implications for chemistry learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 105-143 (2000).8 Kozma, R. B. in Innovations in science and mathematics education: Advanced designs for technologies of learning (eds R. Jacobson & R.B. Kozma) 11-46 (Erlbaum, 2000).9 Roth, W. M. Toward an anthropology of graphing: Semiotic and activity-theoretic perspectives. (Kluwer
on the 8748, the first single-chip microcomputer, and the 8051, a second-generation single-chip microcomputer. In February 1982 he joined the Central Research Laboratories at Texas Instruments as a member of the Technical Staff. At Texas Instruments his research interests centered around GaAs surface acoustic wave devices. In August 1984 he joined the School of Electrical Engineering, Purdue University, as an Assistant Professor and he is presently a Full Professor and Associate Head of the School of Electrical & Computer Engineering.Dr. Sean P. Brophy, Purdue University, West Lafayette Dr. Sean Brophy is learning scientist with degrees in mechanical engineering, computer science and education and human
include electrokinetics, predominantly dielectrophoretic characterizations of cells, and the development of biomedical microdevices. She earned a NSF CAREER award and was nominated for Michigan Professor of the Year in 2014. Research within her Medical micro-Device Engineering Research Laboratory (M.D. – ERL) also inspires the development of Desktop Experiment Modules (DEMos) for use in chemical engineering classrooms or as outreach ac- tivities in area schools (see www.mderl.org). Adrienne is currently Chair of ASEE’s Diversity Committee and PIC I Chair; she has previously served on WIED, ChED, and NEE leadership teams and contributed to 37 ASEE conference proceedings articles.Prof. Tom J Waidzunas, Temple University
learning engineeringsurvey (APPLES) (TR-10-01)”. Technical Report CAEE-TR-10-01. Seattle, WA: Center for the Advancement forEngineering Education, September, 2010.[3] Brown, P. R., “Unlocking student motivation: development of an engineering motivation survey”, in AmericanSociety for Engineering Education Conference, Proceedings of, Atlanta, GA, 2013.[4] Linnenbrink-Garcia, L., Durik, A. M., Conley, A. M., Barron, K. E., Tauer, J. M., Karabenick, S. A.,Harackiewicz, J. M., “Measuring situational interest in academic domains”, in Education and PsychologicalMeasurement, DOI: 10.1177/0013164409355699[5] Huettel, L., “Connecting theory and practice: laboratory-based explorations of the NAE Grand Challenges,” inAmerican Society for Engineering
teacher (7-12) and taught in public schools and museums from 2003-2013.Dr. Marci S. DeCaro, University of Louisville Marci DeCaro is an assistant professor in the Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences at the University of Louisville. Her research focuses on the role of cognitive factors such as working memory in learning and performance situations. She studies these topics with adults and children in laboratory and educational contexts.Dr. Jeffrey Lloyd Hieb, University of Louisville Jeffrey L. Hieb is an Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering Fundamentals at the Univer- sity of Louisville. He graduated from Furman University in 1992 with degrees in Computer Science and Philosophy
. degrees from Xi’an Jiaotong University, China and Ph.D. degree from University of Strathclyde, UK. Prior to joining UBC in 2008, she worked as a research scientist at Ryerson University on various projects in the area of CFD and heat and mass transfer. Dr. Yan has taught a variety of courses including fluid mechanics, fluid machines, mechanics of materials, calculus, and kinematics and dynamic. She has also developed undergraduate fluids laboratories and supervised many capstone projects. Her interest in SoTL is evidence-based teaching strategies, student engagement, faculty development, and teaching and learning communities. Dr. Yan is a registered P.Eng. with APEGBC and has served as reviewer for various
resonator arrays.Dr. Colleen Janeiro, East Carolina University Dr. Colleen Janeiro teaches engineering fundamentals such as Introduction to Engineering, Materials and Processes, and Statics. Her teaching interests include development of solid communication skills and enhancing laboratory skills.Dr. William E. Howard, East Carolina University William E (Ed) Howard is an Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering at East Carolina University. He was previously a faculty member at Milwaukee School of Engineering, following a 14- year career as a design and project engineer with Thiokol Corporation, Spaulding Composites Company, and Sta-Rite Industries. c American Society for Engineering
Paper ID #16813Student Proposals for Design Projects to Aid Children with Severe Disabili-tiesDr. Steve Warren, Kansas State University Steve Warren received a B.S. and M.S. in Electrical Engineering from Kansas State University in 1989 and 1991, respectively, followed by a Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering from The University of Texas at Austin in 1994. Dr. Warren is an Associate Professor in the Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering at Kansas State University. He directs the KSU Medical Component Design Laboratory, a facility partially funded by the National Science Foundation that provides resources for the
-Mona, I. & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2006). Argumentative discourse in a high school chemistry classroom. School Science and Mathematics, 106(8), 349–361. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949- 8594.2006.tb17755.x18. Latour, B. & Woolgar, S. (1986). An anthropologist visits the laboratory. In Labor life: The construction of scientifc facts (pp. 43–103). Princeton University Press.19. Fink, F. K. (2001). Integration of work based learning in engineering education. In Frontiers in Education Conference, 2001. 31st Annual. Reno, NV: IEEE. http://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2001.96374720. Jonassen, D. & Shen, D. (2009). Engaging and supporting problem solving in engineering ethics. Journal of Engineering Education, 98(3), 235
Paper ID #15772Summer Bridge Program Structured to Cover Most Demanding STEM Top-icsMs. Megan McSpedon, Rice University Megan McSpedon is the Associate Director of the Rice Emerging Scholars Program. She has been with the program since it was founded in 2012. Megan received a B.A. in English from Rice University.Dr. Ann Saterbak, Rice University Ann Saterbak is Professor in the Practice in the Bioengineering Department and Associate Dean for Un- dergraduate Education in the School of Engineering at Rice University. Saterbak was responsible for developing the laboratory program in Bioengineering. Saterbak introduced problem
Paper ID #16713System Engineering Education for All Engineers - A Capstone Design Ap-proachDr. Armand Joseph Chaput, Department of Aerospace Engineering and Engineering Mechanics University ofTexas at Austin Dr. Armand J. Chaput is a Senior Lecturer in the Department of Aerospace Engineering and Engineering Mechanics at the University of Texas (UT) at Austin and Director of the Air System Laboratory. He teaches Aircraft Design with a focus on Systems Engineering and Unmanned Air Systems (UAS). Dr. Chaput is a retired Senior Technical Fellow - Air System Design and Integration from Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company where he
this course. With regard to this table, it is importantto note that the WPI academic schedule is based on students taking four terms in an academicyear, with a fifth (optional) summer term. Each term is seven weeks long and three full timecourses/term constitute a full (undergraduate) load. The SE ES capstone course is offered in thefirst term of the year and it is expected that students will take this course concurrent with startingtheir capstone project (MQP but could also be the IQP). A one-term course typically meets fourtimes/week and courses that have laboratory sessions (not this course) also layer in a weekly labsection. A simple calculation shows that as a result of this course/term structure, a typical classwill meet 28 times/term
, manufacturing, and assembly processes. Since 2010, Lo- gan has worked as a private tutor; most recently he has moved from small in-person tutoring into electronic classroom learning as a consultant for an online tutoring service. In previous semesters, he has aided the teaching of introductory design and modeling classes at Florida Polytechnic University. As the operator of the Florida Polytechnic University Robotics Laboratory, he trains students to use fabrication machin- ery, 2D and 3D design software, and analytic methods to aid in student and research projects. Logan also provides 3D modeling, prototyping, and 2D design services to various local companies, and hopes to earn certifications for 3D design in the coming
19 Laboratory Tours 3.47 19 Poster Session 3.47 19 Faculty Meetings 3.44 18Respondents were also asked to provide suggestions for improvement of the event activities.Feedback suggested categorized faculty presentations, more activities outside the building, andbetter attention to time constraints on visitors. Some representative comments include: “Although some students would like a breadth of background on research, most if not all have a major field (imaging, cellular engineering) that they would like to work in; so different, separate groups for each field would allow each presenter to
data. By engaging in these practices, the researchers were able to acknowledge – and to theextent that it was possible – separate their biases from the data they analyzed. Afterwards, theresearchers compiled their findings, and came to consensus with regards to this study’s findings.Findings Findings from this study illustrate that Black men in engineering graduate programsengage with their faculty advisors in various educational spaces, including communication inone-on-one meetings, interactions in the laboratory, and occasional casual conversations.Through these interactions with faculty advisors, students described encountering both positiveand negative experiences that shaped how they valued the advisor-advisee relationship
led energy conservation research projects for Argonne National Laboratory. He has a BS in civil engineering from Carnegie-Mellon University and an MS in civil engineering with an emphasis in regional planning from Northwestern University. Wayne is a frequent speaker and author on continuing education for engineers, and is a member of the College of Engineering’s Education Innovation Committee.Dr. Jeffrey S. Russell, University of Wisconsin, Madison Dr. Jeffrey S. Russell is the Vice Provost for Lifelong Learning and Dean of the Division of Continuing Studies at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. In his role as Vice Provost, he is striving to make UW- Madison a global leader in the service to lifelong learners. He
this case, the novelty of theapproach compared to traditional methods is twofold: (1) the use of a computer game enables usto directly observe problem-solving process through action in the game and (2) because of thenaturally immersive game environment, we hope to see motivation and persistence in the face ofcomplex problems that might otherwise be difficult to achieve in a laboratory setting. As afeasibility study, we will present methods and data that we suggest should guide further researchbut should not be used to make specific claims. Before describing this exploratory study, webriefly review relevant literature of problems and problem-solving.Background on Problem Solving LiteratureOne characterizing difference between problems faced in
“Research 101,” was led by a graduate student lead for theprogram. The format was an oral presentation that discussed the following topics: How to conduct a scientific literature review Types of research questions and research methods Laboratory hierarchy and terminology (from undergraduates all the way up to PI) Culmination of research (journal publications, theses, presentations, etc.) Research Experiences for Undergraduates (REUs) sponsored by the National Science Foundation Other research programs at the University of Colorado BoulderThe third workshop, titled “Grad School 101,” was also led by a graduate student lead of theprogram. The format was an oral presentation that discussed the following topics
the topic in general,they can be much more thorough in their research. This debate helps them discover and exploremuch more than they learn in the lectures. Knowing how to solder electrical components could be a worthwhile skill for constructingsome of the projects. With this in mind, a laboratory session is planned for the students about thebasics of soldering, as well as the basics of electronic devices. This aids their attaining a morepractical perspective of the theoretical concepts that they have heard. For the practice session,each of the students and teachers is given a soldering kit containing instructions and materials tobuild a basic 555 timer circuit. This practical work is fun and interesting, given the fact that theyall have
the area of engineering education research. In his position he is managing several research and development projects on engineering education and technical training. Furthermore he of- fers workshops on professional teaching and learning for engineering faculty. In his research Dominik May focuses, inter alia, on future requirements for science and engineering graduates, such as interna- tional competence, in order to become successful engineers in a globalized professional world. Therefore he designs and investigates respective educational strategies with a special focus on online solutions and the integration of remote laboratories. For his research and the development of several transnational on- line courses he
to provide insight and guide further development.The Start LabThe Solar Technology Applied Research and Testing (START) Laboratory, shown in Figure 1,is a pilot-scale CSP plant that is the first university-owned facility of its type and size in theUnited States [14]. It supports research on next-generation solar devices and provides outreachactivities to educate K-12 students about solar energy and other forms of renewable energy.Physical tours provide limited opportunities for educational experiences, because it is difficultfor many students to travel to the START Lab due to geographical or scheduling constraints. Forbroader delivery of educational experiences, we developed the VEC, also shown in Figure 1.Ritter and Chambers [1] described
-berkeley-physicists-say-a-colleague-took-them-for-a- ride.html?scp=2&sq=victor%20ninov&st=cse&pagewanted=1 Konnikova, M. (2015, May 22). How a gay-marriage study went wrong. The New Yorker Retrieved from http://www.newyorker.com/science/maria-konnikova/how-a-gay-marriage- study-went-wrongAppendix C. Examples of student questions for the expert panelists How many repetitions are required to assure my data is accurate / precise enough? What is the criteria for reporting the make/model of our laboratory instrumentation? Are we under obligation to disclose this at all times? Is there an obligation to report this to personnel who contact us concerning our published works? How and when should I report my
parameter itself, along with the measurement techniques,are not naturally occurring but socially-constructed. Statistically sound measurements requirethat one eliminate all known sources of variation so that one can mathematically verifycorrelations between variables that can be manipulated and the response to those variables (lackof diversity). In other words, objectivist science seeks to reduce variation to a set of controllableconditions. What is often overlooked in reductionist, objectivist science is that the state of naturerarely mimics laboratory conditions, where all influential sources of variation are eliminated.This is particularly true when one is working in a complex, dynamic social system that includeshuman beings.Within STEM cultures
Simulink which areintroduced in laboratory sessions in the control class yielding answer to questions 3 and 4. Question 5validates that they have received sufficient level of C programming breadth and depth to work andsolve problems in follow-up programming courses such as Data Structures for computer students andmicrocontroller programming in Embedded Systems course which use C language extensively for labsessions and projects.Question 6 in both Table 4 and Table 5 poses the same question and received similar responses asexpected. Even with in the stated objectives of a course, students may feel that certain in–depth topicsare unnecessary and extra work. It was obvious that students would consider learning MATLAB asextra work since course title