learning (Kos and Miller,2017; Sullivan-Green, et. al., 2017), student-centered learning (Weimer 2002; Grigg and Stephan,2018), and problem-based method (Oliveira, 2015), etc.Behrouzi and Kuchma addressed an inquiry-based learning pedagogy used in a freshman civil andstructural engineering curriculum with an equipment-light laboratory course (Behrouzi and Kuchma,2016). The project-based learning approach is one of the innovative methods promoted inengineering education. Khorbotly developed a computer vision curriculum in the undergraduateelectrical engineering program using a project-based learning pedagogy. Some issues implementedin project-based approach are addressed (Khorbotly, 2015). Luo presented an on-going multiple-project-based pedagogy
. Framework for Supporting the EM within an Electric Circuits CourseThe Electric Circuit course at the authors’ institution is a sophomore-level, 4-credit hour requiredcourse and includes several engineering disciplines including electrical engineering, mechanicalengineering, computer engineering, and engineering education. There are 3 lectures and a 3 hourlab each week. The topics of the course include: basic electrical quantities, circuit laws andtheorems, analysis techniques, operational amplifiers, storage elements and first-order circuits,AC power analysis, three-phase systems, and ideal transformers. The course includes dailyhomework assignments, weekly quizzes and laboratory assignments, two midterm exams, and acomprehensive final exam. Due to
military students, in large partthrough previous projects specifically developed for military students, as well as from experiencein advising military students when joining an engineering education path and throughout theprogram. For this project the research team used the already established Digital Manufacturingand Collaborative Robotics Laboratory at Old Dominion University. A secondary outreachcomponent of the project addresses the K-12 student population in the community, since the bio-inspired robots built by the veterans during the workshops will be used by individual faculty ofthe research team for outreach activities conducted in the local public schools.Participants’ Recruitment and DemographicsRecent years saw an explosion in STEM
servedby distribution transformers is worth analyzing as the increased load can pose maintenance andfailure concerns to transformers [19]. A study performed by the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) found that theintroduction of an EV load to a distribution transformer increased the failure rate by 0.02% peryear [24]. Reasonably exceeding standard operation ratings have not been found to increase thelikelihood of sudden transformer failures significantly. However, research indicates that increasedload does impact the operation lifespan. A study [25] analyzed how the number of EVs at differentcharging levels affected the aging of a transformer. The results of this study are shown in Table 4.Results indicate that multiple EVs under
motivated the integration ofSTS in the discourse of engineering education was a combination of external developments (suchas globalization and high profile technological disasters such as the Challenger explosion andThree-Mile Island) and a growing recognition within higher education, including engineeringeducation, of the inadequacy of traditional disciplinary structures for providing usefulapproaches to real world problems. The ethical dimensions of engineering work are rarely visibleat the level of individual projects or in the decontextualized environments of engineeringclassrooms and laboratories. As Martin and Schinzinger expressed it in their discussion ofengineering as social experimentation, “Showing moral concern involves a commitment
, AL, USA. He is currently working as an assistant professor at the Department of Intelligent Systems and Robotics, Hal Marcus College of Science and Engineering, University of West Florida (UWF), Pensacola, FL, USA. At UWF, Dr. Rahman contributes to the Ph.D. program in Intelligent Systems and Robotics, and directs the Human-friendly and Interactive Robotics Laboratory (HIR Lab). His research and teaching interests include robotics, mechatronics, control systems, electro-mechanical design, human factors/ergonomics, engineering psychology, virtual reality, artificial intelligence, machine learning, CPS, IoT, computer vision, biomimetics and biomechanics with applications to industrial manip- ulation and
tear of thestudents’ laptops while in use, and these investments need to be constantly renewed. Finally thelarge number of students who enter today’s engineering programs at many institutions providesits own logistical barrier to retention efforts. Developing laboratory experiences that promotepersonal discovery are made more difficult the larger the number of students that must haveaccess.III. Creating a First-Year Computer Programming CourseStudents entering a large engineering program bring a wide variety of background skills. Whilethe ability to understand how computers and computer programming works, and what these toolscan enable is considered to be a basic skill of the modern engineer there is a wide range of howcomputer-ready students
University (Fort Collins, CO, USA) in 2018. There she gained experience working as a graduate teaching assistant for computer aided engineering, biomedical engineering capstone design, and biomedical engineering introductory classes. She served as a Graduate Teaching Fellow for the College of Engineering during the 2016/2017 academic year. Nicole is currently a instructional post-doctoral fellow in the Transforming Engineering Education Laboratory within the Biomedical Engineering Department at the University of Michigan. Her engineering education interests include collaborative active learning, assessment methods and accreditation, and curriculum design. c American Society for Engineering
Research Model," presented at the American Society for Engineering Education, New Orleans, LA, 2016.[35] C. Henderson and M. Dancy, "Barriers to the use of research-based instructional strategies: The influence of both individual and situational characteristics," Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research, vol. 3, p. 20102, 2007.[36] K. S. Yoon, T. Duncan, S. W.-Y. Lee, B. Scarloss, and K. L. Shapley, "Reviewing the Evidence on How Teacher Professional Development Affects Student Achievement. Issues & Answers. REL 2007-No. 033," Regional Educational Laboratory Southwest (NJ1), 2007.[37] R. M. Felder, R. Brent, and M. J. Prince, "Engineering instructional development: Programs, best
, "Strategies to mitigate student resistance to active learning," International Journal of STEM Education, vol. 5, no. 7, 2018.[4] K. Stair and B. Crist Jr, "Using hands-on laboratory experiences to underscore concepts and to creat excitement about materials," in ASEE Annual Conference & Exhibition, Chicago, IL, 2006.[5] W. D. Callister and D. G. Rethwisch, Fundamentals of Materials Science and Engineering: An Integrated Approach, 4th ed., Wiley, 2012.[6] A. F. Heckler and R. Rosenblatt, "Student difficulties with basic concepts in introductory materials science engineering," in Proceedings of the annual ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference.[7] L. Tran and C. Halversen, "Transforming STEM Teaching Faculty Learning Program
, “Enhancing student learning of research methods through the use of undergraduate teaching assistants,” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 759-775, 2014.[4] M. A McVey, C. R. Bennett, J. H. Kim, and A. Self, ”Impact of Undergraduate Teaching Fellows Embedded in Key Undergraduate Engineering Courses,” in Proceedings of the 124th ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Columbus, Ohio, USA, June 2017.[5] L. Wheeler, C. Clark, and C. Grisham, “Transforming a Traditional Laboratory to an Inquiry- Based Course: Importance of Training TAs when Redesigning a Curriculum,” Journal of Chemical Education, vol. 94, iss. 1, pp. 1019-1026, June 2017.[6] G. Guadagni, H. Ma, and L. Wheeler, ”The Benefit of Training
programs haveparticipated in student meetings. NAHB student organization executives also participate in theHBCU’s open house where NAHB flyers are handed to interested persons. Fifty (50) high-schoolstudents participated in the 2018 SciTech Week with the College of Science and Technology andvisited the lead authors’ concrete laboratory, where they were informed about NAHBscholarships and other educational opportunities. Email messages have been sent to some highschool instructors and principals regarding potential collaborations, but response rates have beenlow. Consequently, telephone calls will be used as a follow up to initial emails. Lastly, a summercamp to introduce middle-school girls to STEM and residential construction careers has
and MS Biomed- ical Engineering degrees from Drexel University, and her PhD Bioengineering degree from the University of Washington. Between her graduate degrees, she worked as a loop transmission systems engineer at AT&T Bell Laboratories. She then spent 13 years in the medical device industry conducting medical de- vice research and managing research and product development at several companies. In her last industry position, Dr. Baura was Vice President, Research and Chief Scientist at CardioDynamics. She is a Fellow of the American Institute of Medical and Biological Engineering (AIMBE).Leanne Kallemeyn, Loyola University Chicago Leanne Kallemeyn, Ph.D., is an Associate Professor in Research Methodologies
, “Predicting performance in a first engineering calculus course: Implications for interventions,” Int. J. Math. Educ. Sci. Technol., vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 40–55, 2015.[33] D. B. Bellinger, M. S. DeCaro, and P. A. S. Ralston, “Mindfulness, anxiety, and high- stakes mathematics performance in the laboratory and classroom,” Conscious. Cogn., vol. 37, pp. 123–132, 2015.[34] J. P. Weaver, M. S. DeCaro, J. L. Hieb, and P. A. Ralston, “Social Belonging and First- Year Engineering Mathematics: A Collaborative Learning Intervention.” ASEE Conferences, New Orleans, Louisiana, 2016.[35] P. Weaver, J., DeCaro, M., Hieb, J., Ralston, “Social Belonging and First-Year Engineering Mathematics: A Collaborative Learning Intervention,” in ASEE
. Waveland Press, 2009.[25] G. E. Hall, D. J. Dirksen, and A. A. George, Measuring implementation in schools: Levels of use. Southwest Educational Development Laboratory, 2013.[26] G. E. Hall, “Measuring stages of concern about the innovation: A manual for the use of the soc questionnaire,” 1977.[27] S. Davis, B. Dearing, B. Hill, C. Gattis, and E. Clausen, “Developing lifelong learning skills for middle school teachers: Devising their own engineering and science hands-on activities,” in Proceedings of the 2008 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, 2008.[28] L. S. H. L. B.-A. K. A. N. John D. Carpinelli, Howard S. Kimmel and R. N. Dave, “Translating research experiences into
, 2012.[21] Truax, D. D. "Improving the learning process of laboratory instruction." Proceedings of the2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition. 2004.[22] Muthén, Linda K., and Bengt O. Muthén. Mplus user's guide: Statistical analysis with latentvariables. Muthén & Muthén, 2004.[23] Streiner, David L. A guide for the statistically perplexed: Selected readings for clinicalresearchers. University of Toronto Press, 2013.[24] Netemeyer, Richard G., William O. Bearden, and Subhash Sharma. Scaling procedures:Issues and applications. Sage Publications, 2003.[25] Tabachnick, B. G. & Linda S. Fidell. Using multivariate statistics. Allyn and Bacon, 2001.[26] Revelle, W. psych: Procedures for Personality
a percentage of the “maximum” density measured in a standard laboratory test), and the water content. In general, most engineering properties, such as the strength, stiffness, resistance to shrinkage, and imperviousness of the soil, will improve by increasing the soil density.6. Why is determination of water content of soil important? For many soils, the water content may be an extremely important index used for establishing the relationship between the way a soil behaves and its properties (hydraulic conductivity, consolidation, shear strength properties, etc.). The consistency of a fine-grained soil largely depends on its water content. The water content is also used in expressing the phase relationships of air, water, and
Paper ID #25167Board 112: A STEM Training Program to Improve Middle and High SchoolVEX Competition OutcomesMr. Ryan Bobby Tang Dan, Vaughn College of Aeronautics & Technology Ryan B. Tang Dan is a senior in the Mechatronics and Robotics Engineering Master’s of Science Program at New York University Tandon School of Engineering. He currently works as an adjunct laboratory in- structor for courses such as Introduction to Robotics. Ryan is still an active member of the Vaughn College Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Competition team and works as a faculty advisor to the team. Furthermore, Ryan Tang is the head coach of the VEX
experiences of college. Other activities include student competition teams,such as the Formula SAE, ASME’s Human Powered Vehicle Challenge, ASCE’s Steel Bridge orConcrete Canoe, and several other national and international competitions.ADVANCE students also have opportunities to work with Mason faculty on research projectsand assist in real-world, hands-on laboratory and field studies. Research provides a foundationfor the advancement of critical thinking, project management and team skills as well asopportunities to practice oral and written communication skills. Early participation in research atMason will enable ADVANCE students to prepare competitive proposals for funding their ownresearch interests through Mason’s Office of Student Scholarship
Paper ID #24988Ms. Shannon RobersonDr. Anand K. Gramopadhye, Clemson University Dr. Anand K. Gramopadhye’s research focuses on solving human-machine systems design problems and modeling human performance in technologically complex systems such as health care, aviation and man- ufacturing. He has more than 200 publications in these areas, and his research has been funded by NIH, NASA, NSF, FAA, DOE, and private companies. Currently, he and his students at the Advanced Tech- nology Systems Laboratory are pursuing cutting-edge research on the role of visualization and virtual reality in aviation maintenance, hybrid inspection and job-aiding, technology to support STEM education and, more practically, to address
•Phone and property data •Research data •Proprietary research, formulas, and processes •Techniques and processes •Prototypes or blueprints •Laboratory equipment and software •Software, including source codes •Pre-classification research •Technical components and plans •Access protocols •Vendor information and supply chain •Budget estimates and expenditures
Education, proceedings of,Seattle,WA, 2015.[10] Robson, N., Morgan, J. A. and Radhi, H. J. (2015) ‘Development of an UndergraduateMultidisciplinary Mechanical Design Laboratory Sequence based on Faculty Research’,Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, pp. 1–16.[11] Mennella, T. A. (2015) ‘Designing Authentic Undergraduate Research Experiences in aSingle-Semester Lab Course’, American Biology Teacher (University of California Press), 77(7),pp. 526–531. doi: 10.1525/abt.2015.77.7.7.[12] Orser, D. J., Bazargan, K. and Sartori, J. (2018) ‘Harnessing State-of-the-art Internet ofThings Labs to Motivate First-year Electrical and Computer Engineering Students’, Proceedingsof the ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, pp. 1–15.[13
important topics and example problems in class, and to assign readings and additionalpractice problems for out of class work. It is notable that the measured improvements inperformance occurred despite the significant reduction in lecture time compared to the controlgroup.To create additional lecture time as well as a common exam time for multiple sections of thecourse, a new course model is currently being implemented. Instead of two 80-minute or three50-minute lecture times per week, with one of these often used for examinations, we are movingtoward a model of two 50-minute lecture sessions per week plus one common 110-minutelaboratory time per week. The laboratory time will be used for examinations during most weeks,and for extended problem
persuasive systems to improve the motivation and task performance of individuals.Dr. Conrad S. TuckerDr. Tucker holds a joint appointment as Associate Professor of Engineering Design andIndustrial Engineering at The Pennsylvania State University. He is also an affiliate faculty inComputer Science and Engineering. He is the director of the Design Analysis TechnologyAdvancement (D.A.T.A) Laboratory. His research interests are in formalizing system designprocesses under the paradigm of knowledge discovery, optimization, data mining, andinformatics. His research interests include applications in complex systems design and operation,product portfolio/family design, and sustainable system design optimization in the areas ofengineering education, energy
spiritually, and enjoying her family and friends. Moreover, Dr. Borges is treasurer and co-chair of the Northeastern Association for Science Teacher Education (NE-ASTE) where faculty, researchers, and educators inform STEM teaching and learning and inform policy.Dr. Vikram Kapila, NYU Tandon School of Engineering Vikram Kapila is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering at NYU Tandon School of Engineering (NYU Tandon), where he directs a Mechatronics, Controls, and Robotics Laboratory, a Research Experience for Teachers Site in Mechatronics and Entrepreneurship, a DR K-12 research project, and an ITEST re- search project, all funded by NSF. He has held visiting positions with the Air Force Research Laboratories in Dayton, OH
presents opportunities for students to acquire knowledge by askingquestions to exercise observation skills and deductive reasoning [10]. Joseph Schwab, a pioneerof this pedagogy, recommends that students practice inquiry in laboratory instruction beforebeing presented with large amounts of facts through formal explanation [13]. He considers it asan effective way to improve knowledge transference in comparison to traditional laboratoryinstruction that only offers a formal explanation. Students do not need extensive knowledge ofthe subject matter because they learn about it by asking their target users and teachers.Makerspace students used inquiry through HCD to ask questions and used deductive reasoningin order to gain knowledge about the people
composed of four sub-systems: AC adapter (AC-to-DCconverter), wireless power transmitter module, wireless power receiver module, and earphoneheadset with battery sealed inside. Each sub-system is carefully tested in the laboratory beforeassembling. Wireless power transmitter circuit is soldered with AC adapter, and wireless powerreceiver circuit is soldered with battery load of earphone headset. Online 3D design software isused to design the 3D layout of charging station. 3D designed charging station was successfullyprinted out using 3D printer at school. Transmitter module is placed inside the charging station,and top and bottom parts of charging station is fixed together with glue. After completing thedesign and hardware implementation, the
systems. At Baylor University, he teaches courses in laboratory techniques, fluid mechanics, energy systems, and propulsion systems, as well as freshman engineering. Research interests include renewable energy to include small wind turbine aerodynamics and experimental convective heat transfer as applied to HVAC and gas turbine systems.Dr. William M. Jordan P.E., Baylor University William Jordan is Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Baylor University. He has B.S. and M.S. degrees in metallurgical engineering from the Colorado School of Mines, an M.A. degree in theology from Denver Seminary, and a Ph.D. in mechanics and materials from Texas A & M University. He teaches materials-related courses and does research
. Her technical studies focus on digital circuits and computer engineering. Her prior research experience includes internships at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory and the National Center for Atmospheric Research. She is pas- sionate about intersectionality and advocacy of underrepresented groups in STEM and has participated in research of sociotechnical thinking in undergraduate engineering curriculum.Dr. Stephanie Claussen, Colorado School of Mines Stephanie Claussen’s experience spans both engineering and education research. She obtained her B.S. in Electrical Engineering from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 2005. Her Ph.D. work at Stan- ford University focused on optoelectronics, and she
design processes.Dr. Kathleen H. Sienko, University of Michigan Kathleen H. Sienko is an Arthur F. Thurnau Professor and Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Michigan (UM). She earned her Ph.D. in 2007 in Medical Engineering and Bioastro- nautics from the Harvard-MIT Division of Health Science and Technology, and holds an S.M. in Aero- nautics & Astronautics from MIT and a B.S. in Materials Engineering from the University of Kentucky. She co-founded the UM Center for Socially Engaged Design and directs both the UM Global Health De- sign Initiative (GHDI) and the Sienko Research Group. The Sienko Research Group is a multidisciplinary laboratory developing novel methodologies to create