periodically collect and the NASA scientists have been awarded follow-on fundingconduct real-time analysis of these data will significantly to pursue the first of its kind Class 1-E Facility that isimprove the probability of successful fertilization. WTA intended to operate for over five years on the ISS [1].now plans on commercializing the prototype created by the This same type of partnership has also been usedCapstone team. The company also plans on extending its to support a number of Capstone projects. One of the mostrelationship with the ESET Program moving to a more visible of these was the design project conducted by Tpartnership-like arrangement that would include one to two STAR in
rockets must carry an 8.8 lbpayload, and more points are given for payloads that abide to CubeSat dimensions. Besides theserather basic requirements, the design space is open-ended, allowing for almost infinite vehicledesigns. More points are awarded to more complex and creative designs.Along with building complex launch vehicles, RPL aims to prepare its members to becompetitive applicants when trying to enter the aerospace workforce, whether those opportunitiesbe internships or full-time jobs. To do so, members of RPL have access to advanced technologyand experience realistic engineering obstacles. Detailed CAD models are made of each launchvehicle, assisting in manufacturing detail and overall mission planning. Manufacturing iscompleted
engineeringstudents, but also helps with engineering focused activities for the College, networks with K-12teachers, creates a wide variety of engineering centered lesson plans, and gives tours to visitingK-12 schools from across the state. The resource is classroom-unaffiliated, meaning it was notcreated for the purpose of supporting the first-year project and is independent of the College ofEngineering curriculum. The formal support provided to first-year projects was implementedyears after the program’s inception and arose out of a desire to help students thrive in their first-year, not as a demand of the current curriculum. This resource is a combination of a peer-led learning and leadership program and thetraditional makerspace concept. The
for thepost-requisite class. Both can be done, as subsequent iterations of the post-requisite course maybe planned which already take into account potential gaps in knowledge of Thermodynamics I,regardless of the reason. This includes students with C-level performance to A-levelperformance, whether there are knowledge gaps to fill, or there is benefit to be realized by quickreactivation of knowledge early on in the semester. This also benefits instructors who havecertain topics that they’d like to emphasize or use to engage students in higher level thinking, butcould benefit from first having students brought “back up to speed.” For example, Dunsworthand Wu’s [2] “flipped review” procedure provides a model which address this by
identify, understand, and adapt to therapidly evolving needs and circumstances of contemporary SVSM.SVSM Research in Higher Education. In the post WWII era, higher education researchattended more to student veteran issues than to student veteran experiences. These issuesincluded the larger impacts of G.I. Bill assistance programs [e.g., 16, 17], curricular design andinstructional delivery needs of veterans [e.g., 18, 19, 20], provisions for awarding college creditfor past military training, courses, and experience [e.g., 17], and the types of supports needed bystudent veterans [e.g., 17, 21, 22, 23]. Few studies of this era attended to student veteranexperience; those that did so chronicled student veteran post discharge academic plans
education. In P John Williams, Alister Jones, and Cathy Buntting, editors, The future of technology education, pages 169–185. Springer, Singapore, 2015.[13] Marc J de Vries. Technological knowledge. In Teaching about technology: An introduction to the philosophy of technology for non-philosophers, pages 23–38. Springer, Dordrecht, 2016.[14] Per Norstr¨om. How technology teachers understand technological knowledge. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 24(1):19–38, 2014.[15] Eddie Norman. Design epistemology and curriculum planning. Design and Technology Education: An International Journal, 18(2):3–5, 2013.[16] P. John Williams. Technological literacy: A multliteracies approach for democracy. International
system in California was established by the 1960 Donahue HigherEducation Act, better known as California’s Master Plan for Higher Education [1]. The structureof the system is in three tiers- the state-wide University of California (UC), the regionallyorientated California State University (CSU), and the locally focused Community Colleges (CC)[7]. Each of these systems has a different enrollment criterion: the UC system being the mostselective and the CC system open to all students who are at least 18 years old or a high schoolgraduate. As established in the Master Plan, the goal of the UC system is to award bachelor’sdegrees to the top 12.5% of high school graduates and the CSU has a target of 33.3% of thepopulation [7].As largest university
others.People form friendships with individuals who resemble them, and individuals coalesce intosocial groups on the basis of common attributes [14]. Furthermore, group identification predictsself-stereotyping. People apply the group’s characteristics to themselves or apply their individualcharacteristics to the group, downplaying differences they may have with group members [15],[16]. As a result, people often feel positive emotions, such as solidarity and unity, whenembedded among similar people.To compare the predictions made by the application of ODT at the individual level (ODT-I) withalternative theories, we planned two self-report studies. These studies have small sample sizesand thus only constitute a preliminary investigation.Study 1The first
table (Figure 2).Figure 2. Plan view of table with parallel forces applied via ropesPrior to the pulling by volunteers, a force diagram is drawn of the table top (plan view) showingthe x-forces; friction forces beneath the table legs are assumed to be equal and opposite and, thus,cancel. Equilibrium equations (Fx 0, Fy 0, M O 0) are written to reach the obviousconclusion that all forces balance in both directions, thus, translational acceleration is notexpected. Since rotational equilibrium is not satisfied (M O 300 in-lb) , students are promptedto predict the rigid body motion. The volunteers apply forces to the ropes to inevitably cause thetable to rotate counterclockwise due to the couple moment.Summation of moments is revisited
laboratory sessions are spent on the classwide project described above. Theproject is 7 weeks long and proceeds in stages. Each team first produces the sequence diagramsfor their unit, and then implements the sequential control by using a “class standard” ladder logicwith code libraries, moves on to programming an HMI screen for their unit and then startstesting. The students start testing parts of their code by the third week. Week 6 is the big unittest, conducted like a Factory Acceptance Test (FAT) with a published test plan, much like whathappens in a consulting engineering firm’s office before the project is commissioned in the realmanufacturing facility. The seventh week is the test of the inter-unit communication andcoordination, like the
scores, financial need status, involvement inextracurricular activities, recommendation letters, essay writing skills and whether the candidatewas from an underrepresented group in engineering. Each committee members’ rankings wereaggregated equally to figure out the overall student eligibility ranking.Finally, the candidates were contacted with official scholarship offer letters. The selection ofseven candidates whom all accepted the offers were realized in two rounds of selection cycle. Inorder to implement an evaluation plan with the purpose of measuring this project’s early impactin attracting and recruiting students for careers in nuclear related fields, a first semester intakesurvey of not only award candidates but their peers in the
Columbia University and the Cooper Union in New York City. She received her PhD from Columbia University in 2006, where her research focused on the mechanical and frictional properties of articular cartilage. Dr. Basalo ’s teaching experience includes Thermodynamics, Computer Graphics, Materials Science and laboratory courses. Since 2015 she has been actively involved in the University of Miami College of Engineering’s ”Redefining Engineering Education” strategic plan on educational innovation. As part of this plan, Dr. Basalo worked with 2 other faculty members to organize inaugural Senior Design Expo in May 2017, an exposition where over 200 senior students showcased their Capstone projects to the University of Miami
students,and it made it difficult for her to think about funds of knowledge in a new setting with middleschool students. The summer program gave her the opportunity to redefine how learninghappens in a different setting. She realized, I don't even have the background…For me, it was helpful to have, like, every moment kind of scripted out. It was a nice way for me training but I also sometimes didn't have enough practice employing funds of knowledge. It's something that it didn't go as planned. Sometimes like I don't know what to do and that I wish I had more experience and more training and being able to reach students and doing something out of what was planned, I guess. At that moment, I didn't have much
Yes=1, No=0 Strategic importance planning of entrepreneurship work or not 0.020 0.052 The relevant policies on entrepreneurship issued by university 0.032 The total number of “Internet +” awards received nationwide and provincial in that year. 0.051 Achievement degree Ranking in Hurun’s Richest Creative Chinese University 0.076 Ranking 0.010 Ranking in Top 100 of the most innovative universities in China 0.015From the first level of
with same format that are deliverableas distance learning products through an LMS or traditional handouts. It is important to realizethat the objectives of the collaborative initiative were not to cause confusion or conflict in eitheron-campus or distance offerings at different institutions. All the available course and lab modulesare available at www.ucdistancetraing.org. Photo 1. uC Training System and TI Tiva LaunchPadImplementation Strategies and Planning for On-Campus and Distance Hands-on Approach The EET 470 “Microprocessor/Microcontroller Based Designs” offered at ODU is asenior elective course offered in a real-time, hands-on distance delivery format where instructorlectured via Adobe Connect web-based video
require Grand Challenges Scholars to work ininterdisciplinary teams. To foster such collaboration and lay a foundation bridgingengineering and the liberal arts, we developed a linked pair of first-year-seminars addressinga “grand challenge.” Building on the WPI Great Problems model [2], these two First YearSeminars are team taught by a mechanical engineer and a political scientist, each addressingthe problem of global hunger. Students from both sections work together in project teams andparticipate in discussions of course topics and shared readings. The course includes acommunity-based learning component as well as the development of a research &development plan for future engagement.Table 1. The 14 Grand Challenges issued by the National
behaves just and is requested in its program; where horizontal is considered 90°, at 60° the vehicle retreats just as designed. Lastly, the Bluetooth module communicates commands between the smart phone and the microcontroller well and allows for communication across a classroom's length reliably. The vehicle drive straight forward with little curve, turns slowly when requested, and stops on command. Individually and in controlled tests, these units and their written code work just and exactly as planned. Yet, in conjunction, these elements are not as synchronous as desired when the vehicle is in motion. These anomalies have been analyzed thoroughly over many weeks, and every attempt to better correct available
collaborating with local high school curricula to raise awareness of their programs bysharing resources, such as inviting a local high school to use Red College’s computer numericalcontrol (CNC) machines as part of a planned memorandum of understanding (MoU) between theschools and the College.Red College’s leadership reported that their top priorities were also their top challenges. Forexample, the department chair stated AM program growth to meet industry needs was a toppriority and a top challenge. The department chair also cited funding for facilities, resources, andfaculty, as a priority and a challenge to securing the growth of their AM program.Case 4: Green State CollegeGreen College is a four-year, primary Associate’s granting public institution
whenthe presentation and, thus, end of the role-play approach. The non-AR team uses the verbalcommunication (e.g. in the introductory round and first planning phase) particularly duringthe conception phase of the shared apartment’s model in order to discuss who takes whichtask in order to meet all the requirements given. The AR team, in opposition, does not useverbal communication for conceptualising their model of the shared apartment, butimmediately takes the tablets with the AR app into usage.When comparing the timestamps creating different phases of the collaboration, it is identifiedfrom the given data that the process divides into three phases for both teams that, however,differ in their length and contents: the first phase for the non-AR
Paper ID #25791Free-Writing with a TWIST: A Novel Strategy to Enhance Student Learningin PhysicsDr. Teresa L. Larkin, American University Teresa L. Larkin is an Associate Professor of Physics Education and Director and Faculty Liaison to the Combined Plan Dual-degree Engineering Program at American University. Dr. Larkin conducts ed- ucational research and has published widely on topics related to the assessment of student learning in introductory physics and engineering courses. Noteworthy is her work with student writing as a learning and assessment tool in her introductory physics courses for non-majors. One component of
controller hardware with an MBDenvironment to allow students to investigate, design, and test controllers for more complexcontrol systems, without having to add substantially to the complexity, cost, or size of the kit.The HIL tester component will be initially provided with a model of an inverted pendulum, forwhich students can devise control strategies to stabilize the system. Development and testing ofthe HIL will be performed for the inverted pendulum, however, it is expected that the kit will beexpanded to include other control systems experiments over time. The kit has not yet been testedin a classroom setting, so comparisons of student outcomes to standard educational techniquesare not yet available. Classroom testing is planned and will be
the course content. Furtherinvestigations are needed to draw a solid conclusion and we plan to ask questions regarding theconnection between computational modules and course content in future surveys. 100 90 80 Fraction of responses 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0
/societal problem of Earthatmosphere greenhouse effect and to the growing problem of dwindling water resources. Studentslearn to interpret embedded sensory information (in this case a thermometer) as active part of thetrial and error design process.Figure 1: The overall winner of the mousetrap competition, which surprisingly won bothevents despite the radically opposing event objectives.Other graded course activities attempted to plant the seeds of what can be viewed as SystemsApproach to Engineering. One such example is that of production planning using the EXCELSolver Optimization tool. To many it may seem premature to teach students, most of whom havenot yet finished their calculus courses, about optimization. We noted however that by getting
higher education encounter barriers due to traditional cultureand structural norms that tend to discourage or do not promote possible productive activity orresearch. To combat these barriers, a paradigm shift is necessary to help provideinterdisciplinary research and pedagogy. The Consortium of National Arts EducationAssociations [14] suggests eight conditions for higher education leaders to facilitate to enable aninterdisciplinary environment. Among the conditions they suggest are: a common planning timeor sufficient opportunities to meet other faculty, flexible scheduling, appropriate resources, aswell as community and administrative support and involvement. Nancarrow et al. [10] offerssuggestions in the form of ten key characteristics
. She holds a Ph.D. in Learning, Teaching, and Social Policy from Cornell University, and an Ed.M. in Administration, Planning, and Social Policy from the Harvard Graduate School of Education.Dr. Ebony Omotola McGee, Vanderbilt University Ebony McGee, associate professor of diversity and STEM education at Vanderbilt Universityˆa C™s Peabody College, investigates what it means to be racially marginalized in the context of learning and achieving in STEM higher education and industry. In partic ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Development of the Persistence of Engineers in the Academy Survey (PEAS)AbstractThis paper reports the
human behaviors and incorporating that knowledge within the scope of engineering.Caroline Clay, James Madison University Caroline Clay is an undergraduate student at James Madison University in the Engineering Department. She is a student researcher studying how engineering students learn in informal learning environments and makerspaces, with an emphasis on how students learn in structured and unstructured settings. After participating in the University Innovation Fellows program Caroline is pursuing an honors thesis study- ing how students learn to become changemakers. Following graduation, Caroline plans to work in the intersection between entrepreneurship, engineering, and agriculture. c
disciplinary migration.MethodologyThis investigation was carried out through a mixed method study, utilizing a survey administeredover the web using Qualtrics and a follow-up interview. The dataset originated from an earlierstudy that explored differences between Direct-Pathway and Returner graduate students [24, 25].This survey contained sections on demographics, academic information and experience,confidence, alignment of the master’s degree with work, academic advising, and choice ofschool, future plans, and motivation for graduate study.ParticipantsParticipants for the survey were recruited by rolling recruitment over a period of four months. Inaccordance with the IRB-approved protocol, all survey data was anonymized and confidential. Atotal of
her tenure as an AAAS fellow, she served as a science advisor to the US EPA in the National Center for Environmental Assessment and in the Immediate Office of the Assistant Administrator of the Office of Research and Development.Dr. Michelle Marks, George Mason University Dr. Michelle Marks is the Vice President for Academic Innovation & New Ventures at George Mason University. In this capacity she is responsible for identifying, launching, and sustaining educational ini- tiatives that fulfill Mason’s strategic plan and generate financial resources to support students, faculty, and the educational mission. Charged with creating accessible student pathways and bringing learning science innovations to campus, Dr
- versity of Miami. Prior to joining the University of Miami in 2014, she worked as an adjunct professor at Columbia University and the Cooper Union in New York City. She received her PhD from Columbia University in 2006. Since 2015 Dr. Basalo has been actively involved in the University of Miami College of Engineering’s ”Redefining Engineering Education” strategic plan on educational innovation.Gemma Henderson, University of Miami Gemma Henderson is a Senior Instructional Designer for the LIFE (Learning, Innovation and Faculty En- gagement) team in Academic Technologies at the University of Miami (UM). Gemma partners with fac- ulty members, academic units, and other university stakeholders to create innovative, effective
training. Furthermore, the EngineeringGoldShirt Program collaborated with several other diversity serving summer bridge programs oncampus to design and implement a full day workshop which reinforced the principles that theseprograms foster and to build connections with other programs’ mentors.During the two week summer bridge program, the mentors served both as residence advisors(RA’s) in the residence halls and teaching assistants (TA’s) in the classroom for the summerbridge classes. This duality allowed the mentors to recognize and encourage students where theyneeded it most on an individual basis. Mentors planned social and group identity buildingactivities for the protégé’s. As a result of a demanding schedule and workload during summerbridge