Asee peer logo
Displaying results 7501 - 7530 of 8955 in total
Conference Session
Potpourri: Various Issues and Topics in Graduate Studies
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Catherine G.P. Berdanier, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Ekembu Kevin Tanyi, Norfolk State University; IRVING K CASHWELL Jr, Norfolk State University; Tasha Zephirin, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Monica Farmer Cox, Purdue University, West Lafayette
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Graduate Studies
Paper ID #15175Learning to Conduct ”Team Science” through Interdisciplinary EngineeringResearchDr. Catherine G.P. Berdanier, Purdue University, West Lafayette Catherine G.P. Berdanier holds a Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Purdue University. She earned her B.S. in Chemistry from The University of South Dakota and her M.S. in Aeronautical and Astronautical Engineering from Purdue University. Her research interests include graduate-level engineering education, including engineering writing, inter- and multidisciplinary graduate education, innovative and novel grad- uate education experiences, global learning, and
Conference Session
Assessment I: Developing Assessment Tools
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Wajid Hussain, The Islamic University in Madinah; Fong K. Mak P.E., Gannon University; Mohammad Faroug Addas, The Islamic University in Madinah
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
Conference Session
Instruments and Methods for Studying Student Experiences and Outcomes
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
David Reeping, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Cherie D. Edwards, Virginia Commonwealth University
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
mixed section is featured - else themixing is done in the discussion without a dedicated heading. Templates for writing dissertationsand journal articles recommend the divided format [see 30]. This reporting approach often alignswith how the design was conducted, e.g., a quantitative phase followed by a qualitative phase ortwo phases concurrently, but more integrated designs with multiple stages are not easily splitcleanly between quantitative and qualitative results.Some designs have transgressed the separate quantitative and qualitative results sections andinstead framed their results from their themes. Fogg-Rogers, Lewis, and Edmonds [34] in theEuropean Journal of Engineering Education and Crede and Borrego [35] in the Journal ofEngineering
Conference Session
New Tools in Teaching and Learning Biomedical Engineering Concepts
Collection
2007 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Vikki Hazelwood, Stevens Institute of Technology; Arthur Ritter, Stevens Institute of Technology
Tagged Divisions
Biomedical
written surveys, they stopped writing their name or student ID number, and beganwriting their subject number only.Other aspects of their conduct demonstrated that students gained familiarity with biomedicalresearch. In the first visit, they had to be told to take their socks off to step on the impedancescale. In each case, the researchers explained why a measurement must be taken in bare feet. Insubsequent visits, the students did not require instructions to remove their socks. Similarly, theywere dressed more appropriately for the skin-fold measurement assessment. Page 12.7.8Student FAQ’s and commentsAs mentioned, many students asked questions
Conference Session
Professional Development and Scholarship
Collection
2007 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Ahmed Khan, DeVry University; Amin Karim, DeVry University
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Technology
- Knowledge / Working as in Prof. Org. Writing Conf./ Books / to-date via Skills Consultant Papers Workshops Journals Internet transfer / Seminars from Sr. faculty12. Institutional Affiliation: Figure 2 shows the frequency distribution of respondents’institutional affiliations. The Figure 2 Respondents' Institutional Affiliation 2003 2007 100 90 75 80 67 60
Conference Session
Outreach and Recruitment
Collection
2006 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Marsha Lee, Texas A&M University; Jan Rinehart, Texas A&M University; Scott Starks, University of Texas-El Paso; Karen Villatoro, Texas A&M University
Tagged Divisions
Minorities in Engineering
is an example of what waslooked for when partnering.Though successful precollege programs differ in their organization, length, and programelements, they do possess similar attributes and features.6 In general these include mathematicsand science preparation, hands-on laboratory experimentation, guest speakers, journal writing,exposure to the engineering workplace through field trips, and others. The TexPREP program isdiscussed from the standpoint of its serving as a model for a successful precollege program.The goals for El Paso TexPREP program are the following: • To acquaint student participants with professional opportunities in engineering; • To reinforce the mathematics preparation of these students at high school and college
Conference Session
NSF Grantees' Poster Session
Collection
2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Russell Pimmel, University of Alabama (Emeritus); Ann F. McKenna, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus; Norman L. Fortenberry, American Society for Engineering Education; Brian Yoder; Rocio C Chavela Guerra, American Society for Engineering Education
Tagged Topics
NSF Grantees Poster Session
faculty develop the strategiesand understanding of the learning process that are necessary to develop a learning centered-classroom. 28 The program offered introductory and advanced workshops and on-goingbiweekly meetings. It reflected the belief that faculty needed to experience learning in alearning-centered atmosphere and to practice in their own classrooms with continued supportfrom their peers. Evaluation data showed that workshop participants that attend the regularmeetings (i. e., became part of the community) reported changes is classroom behavior; whilethose that did not reported marginal or no progress in implementing changes in their classrooms,emphasizing the importance of continued interactions.An extensive bioengineering curriculum
Conference Session
Integrating Engineering Economy into Curricula
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Heath J. LeBlanc, Ohio Northern University; Bryan O'Neil Boulanger, Ohio Northern University
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Economy
groups (as fictitious companies) to respond to theRFP with the ECE students acting as internal liaisons to aid the CE students in their proposaldevelopment. The ECE students were required to generate estimates of quarterly operating andmaintenance expenses for the data center and were given a trajectory of expected benefits fromthe data center over its 10-year expected lifecycle. After the CE groups submitted the proposals,the ECE students were then tasked with generating quarterly pro forma cash flow statements foreach proposal. The proposal cash flows were compared using incremental rate of return analysisto determine which proposal was the best from an engineering economic perspective. Finally,each ECE student was required to write a
Conference Session
Computers and Simulation
Collection
2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Hatem M. Wasfy, Advanced Science and Automation Corp.; Tamer M. Wasfy, Indiana University-Purdue University, Indianapolis; Jeanne Peters, Advanced Science and Automation Corp.
Tagged Divisions
Computers in Education
Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI). Dr. Wasfy is also the founder and chairman of Advanced Science and Automation Corp. (founded in 1998) and AscienceTutor (founded in 2007). Wasfy’s research and development areas include: flexible multibody dynamics, finite element modeling of solids and fluids, fluid-structure interaction, belt-drive dynamics, tires mechanics/dynamics, ground ve- hicle dynamics, visualization of numerical simulation results, engineering applications of virtual-reality, and artificial intelligence. He authored and co-authored more than 70 peer-reviewed publications and gave more than 65 presentations at international conferences and invited lectures in those areas. He received
Conference Session
K-12 Teacher Professional Development
Collection
2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Keith A. Schimmel, North Carolina A&T State University; Muktha Jost, North Carolina A&T State University; Tyrette Sherlone Carter, North Carolina A&T State University; Shawn Raquel Watlington, North Carolina A&T State University; Terrie Ruth McManus, Ragsdale High School, Guilford County Schools; Solomon Bililign, North Carolina A&T State University; Terry White Worrell, Guilford County Schools; Yuh-Lang Lin, North Carolina A&T State University
Tagged Divisions
K-12 & Pre-College Engineering
or science teachers) completeda total of 20 modules at the end of the three week Institute. The 5E Inquiry Model15 wasintegrated into an instructional design for teachers to follow in the module writing process.A typical day at the Institute started with a one-hour presentation by STEM experts with the goalbeing to share samples of STEM research in the world. STEM technology workshops based onWeb 2.0 technologies were another key component. Teacher participants were presented withspecific technologies for approximately two hours each morning. Afternoon professionaldevelopment sessions were devoted to teams working in separate spaces on their specificmodules, with hands-on support from the STEM graduate students and the science
Conference Session
Programs Using New Instrumentation Concepts
Collection
2010 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Richard Layton, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Thomas Adams, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology
Tagged Divisions
Instrumentation
and visualization, and engineering system dynamics. His work has been recognized with multiple best-paper awards. He conducts workshops in student team-building, team-formation and peer evaluation, in laboratory assessment, and in effective teaching. Prior to his academic career, Dr. Layton worked for twelve years in consulting engineering, culminating as a group head and a project manager. He is a guitarist and songwriter and a member of the rock band “Whisper Down”.Thomas Adams, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Thomas M. Adams is an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. He earned a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Rose-Hulman
Conference Session
Introduction to Engineering: The Present State
Collection
2003 Annual Conference
Authors
Anita Mahadevan-Jansen
Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2003, American Society for Engineering Educationinternet, and skills training for applications that range from word processing to spreadsheets tomathematical tools such as Matlab. While such a course was appropriate in the past, the currentcrop of entering freshman is increasingly savvy about the use of computers, the network and theInternet. Almost every student uses e-mail on a regular basis and has used word-processingsoftware for writing reports. In addition, there is an increasing cohort of students who have usedbasic spreadsheet functions and have basic programming skills.This change in the baseline of the entering freshman points to a need for a paradigm shift in
Conference Session
Design in Freshman Year
Collection
2004 Annual Conference
Authors
Anita Mahadevan-Jansen; Christopher Rowe
fundamental set of criteriaand deliverables, which include a grand challenge statement, a culminating activity/deliverable, aminimum of 3 assignments that apply the concepts of problem solving learned in module 1, oralpresentations, design and technical writing amongst others.Assessment and evaluation will be facilitated by surveys conducted of students and instructorsacross all sections to obtain feedback on the progress and efficacy of the course. Student-basedassessment shows that this course was beneficial toward student confidence in choice of majorand working knowledge of current events within that discipline. Instructor-based assessmentsshows that several improvements have to be made to better achieve the learning objectives of thecourse
Conference Session
Integration vs. Compartmentalization
Collection
2003 Annual Conference
Authors
Jeff Goldberg
Lockheed Martin [5] – “Generally speaking they're (engineering students) very well prepared in their own discipline. And also in the fundamentals, math or literature. If I broaden from the students I'm teaching, just to the general group of graduates in college today, I would say the principal shortcoming of the engineering students is a lack of breadth in terms of their ability to communicate in writing, verbally, [and] their lack of background in public policy issues, political science issues, those things that affect engineering. Just as the laws of physics affect engineering, so, too, do the laws of the land. And engineers and scientists. . .have generally been relatively inept at dealing with
Conference Session
Course Assessment in ET
Collection
2002 Annual Conference
Authors
Wayne Hager; Ronald Land
opportunity for the engineeringtechnology community, at both the two- and four-year level, to work collectively to develop, incooperation with EBI, a national survey that can be used for benchmarking associate andbaccalaureate degree programs that are viewed as peers nationwide. The EBI has been in thebusiness of doing educational surveys for many years, primarily for the leading business schoolsin the country. Because they use a common survey tool for a large number of schools, a servicethey are able to offer client schools, in addition to the results of the type discussed here, is acomparison with up to five other schools offering similar programs. All results are displayed inconfidential mode so that no single schools identity is revealed. A
Conference Session
Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM) Technical Session 23
Collection
2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Leslie Bostwick, Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering; Alex George, Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering; Trinity Lee, Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering; Zachary Del Rosario, Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM)
: Statistics educators broadly agree that “(a)nyserious discussion of statistical thinking must examine the role of 'variation'” [3]. In this work,we use the phrase “statistical variability” to refer to variability as it is viewed by statisticians: anubiquitous phenomenon to be directly studied and modeled.Despite its importance, prior failures in engineering can be traced to the neglect of variability [4].In the 1950s, design of aircraft for “the average man” led to uncontrollable aircraft [5]. At theheight of this issue, as many as 17 pilots crashed in a single day [6]. Similar issues persist inmodern engineering practice: As of writing, female passengers are crudely modeled as a scaledversion of the male median in automobile crash test practice [7
Conference Session
Capstone Design II
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Susannah Howe, Smith College; Mary A. Moriarty, Smith College; Apurva Errabelli
Tagged Divisions
Design in Engineering Education
separating the technical skills versus the process related skills. (S4) Page 22.1543.10 We actually made a list on paper to write down what goes in each category … We split up our map into different areas of transferability. (S2) We decided to just get a bunch of colors and shapes and kind of throw them in the middle. (S6)Interestingly, several of the students commented that their process of making the map was areflection of their overall team process throughout the project: We each shouted different things at each other and said ok so what do we want to see, and then we just kind of went for it. … that
Conference Session
NSF Grantees Poster Session
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Larry J. Shuman, University of Pittsburgh; Mary E. Besterfield-Sacre, University of Pittsburgh; Tuba Pinar Yildirim, University of Pittsburgh; Karen M. Bursic, University of Pittsburgh; Natasa Vidic, University of Pittsburgh
Tagged Topics
NSF Grantees
pattern among engineering students.However, it is possible that the MEAs did not require much iteration during solution.We also investigated the time that students allocated to different phases of a model building ex-ercise (namely, the initiation, problem solving and finishing phases). Generally speaking, weobserved that allocating equal amounts of time to each problem solving phase is most beneficial.Specifically, we observed that in general, the students who earned the higher grades devoted ap-proximately the same amount of time to each of these three phases: Understanding the problem and searching for a solution, Solving the problem, and Evaluating and writing up the results.These “balanced workers” who put more emphasis on the
Conference Session
Active and Project-Based Learning
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
John S. Lamancusa, Pennsylvania State University, University Park; Laura L. Pauley, Pennsylvania State University, University Park
Tagged Divisions
Mechanical Engineering
(including how tofire a team member), and member roles. Examples of previous contracts are provided on whichto build. The very act of writing a team contract forces students to think about potentialproblems and their consequences. The contract is their first line of defense and helps them dealwith many problems internally. Since we have instituted the contract, team problems requiringinstructor intervention seem to have decreased.It is critical to quickly identify team problems which might adversely impact the team’sperformance and which might require instructor intervention. However, students are extremelyhesitant to report team problems to the instructor because they do not want to get their peers “in-trouble”. The team situation must usually be
Conference Session
Institutional Transformations
Collection
2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Pamela S. Lottero-Perdue Ph.D., Towson University
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
: “That’s really not my job to be nice to you. I shouldn’t be mean, but… that shouldn’t be a primary criteria [sic] that you’re using … to evaluate me.” Theme 2: Is she good enough? Related to the above theme is what some participantsregard as an assumption that male faculty are good enough, as juxtaposed by an absence of suchan assumption for female faculty. Rather, some female STEM faculty feel as though they need toeither prove to colleagues that they’re good enough (i.e., that they are well within the regime ofcompetence within their respective communities of practice), or demonstrate achievement wellbeyond their male peers to be considered equally competent. Margaret and Carla articulatedthese views in the following interview excerpts
Conference Session
First-Year Programs Division Technical Session 14: Introductory Programming Assessment, Plagiarism, Motivation, Engagement, and Textbooks
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Laura Alford, University of Michigan; Heather Rypkema, University of Michigan; Ryien Hosseini, University of Michigan; Megan Beemer, University of Michigan; Harsh Jhaveri, University of Michigan
the exams(for retroactive analysis, we define “struggling” as students who accumulate fewer than 80% ofavailable course points). The two exams that we used (midterm and final, each worth 20% of astudent’s final grade) were considered to be the primary assessment of students’ individualunderstanding of course material, as the bulk of other course work is either done in groups, with apartner, or graded leniently (e.g. “for completion”).Faculty Workload: Writing Exams Is an Excessive Drain on Faculty TimeThis course is team-taught, and the faculty spend most of their time coordinating amongst eachother and the teaching assistants to ensure that we provide a consistent and inclusive teachingexperience across all of the various lectures and lab
Conference Session
Exemplary Outreach Programs in Engineering Education
Collection
2009 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Pamela Lottero-Perdue, Towson State University
Tagged Divisions
K-12 & Pre-College Engineering
detrimental to people and the larger environment.Another approach educators can take to encourage children to critically analyze technologycomes from the ‘critical text analysis’ (CTA) and ‘critical literacy’ traditions in literacy (i.e.,reading/writing) education.11 Advocates of CTA assert that it is imperative for individuals of allages to not only decode what they read, comprehend what they read, and consider text use andtheir purpose for reading, but also to ask questions about text positioning, i.e., to ask: ≠ How does this text position me, others, or reality? ≠ Does this text include or ignore my or others’ voice(s)? ≠ In whose interests has this text been written?12For example, elementary children have examined advertisements sent
Conference Session
Non-Traditional Doctoral Programs
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Carmen Torres-Sánchez, Loughborough University; Paul P. Conway, Loughborough University
Tagged Divisions
Graduate Studies
Conference Session
Design in the ECE Curriculum
Collection
2010 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Randal Abler, Georgia Tech; James Krogmeier, Purdue University; Aaron Ault, Purdue University; Julia Melkers, Georgia Institute of Technology; Tamara Clegg, Georgia Institute of Technology; Edward Coyle, Georgia Institute of Technology
Tagged Divisions
Electrical and Computer
Learning and Socialization: How is the student experience (at all levels) and knowledge of engineering design processes changed as a result of VIP involvement? What other skills and knowledge have they gained (technical skills, working within a team, communication, attitudes and interest in engineering, etc.) that may be attributed to the VIP experience? How do these coincide with faculty expectations of the student experience? If there are differences, what might explain them and how can the VIP program be improved? Student Mentoring Experiences: What expectations do students have regarding faculty and peer mentoring in the VIP environment? What types of mentoring exchange are considered to be most valuable with the VIP design team environment
Conference Session
Innovative Strategies for Enhancing Engineering Education Across Diverse Learning Environments
Collection
2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Aya Mouallem, Stanford University; Trisha Kulkarni, Stanford University; Sheri D. Sheppard, Stanford University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Electrical and Computer Engineering Division (ECE)
applied solder toensure that it has not overflown, and at the same time, that it sufficiently covered the connectionarea. Kulkarni “felt sad and frustrated about missing the useful [soldering] repetition” throughoutthe course. She also reflected on the importance of soldering exposure, as a missed opportunityfor her, through her peers’ experiences in a lab that requires students to solder tens of LEDs tobuild an LED cube. She stated, “To some, the immense amount of soldering in this lab is one ofthe most memorable components of the class, for better or for worse… With the LED arrayproject, you're soldering repeatedly to learn the skill.” As a result of such exclusion due to theableist, primarily visual nature of lab tools, Kulkarni “focused much
Conference Session
Minoritization Processes and Equity in Engineering Education
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Stacey Sexton; Amanda Menier, SageFox Consulting Group; Rebecca Zarch, SageFox Consulting Group
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Liberal Education/Engineering & Society Division (LEES)
computing and engineering students, wewill need to develop a research agenda that further elucidates this nascent area of study. Weparticularly expect that intentional work will be needed to uncover the as-yet poorly understoodecosystem surrounding TNB computing students, their advocates, and their allies. In particular,we see a clear need to understand intersections with race and disability, as the 2015 U.S.Transgender Survey showed that TNB people of color and people with disabilities had worseoutcomes than their already marginalized peers [3]. In order to be a force for change for thisgoal, we held a virtual workshop to develop a research agenda that includes TNB students inBPC/BPE for inclusive and intersectional policy, practices, and
Conference Session
Student Assessments and Tests
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Viyon Dansu, Florida International University; Yashin Brijmohan, University of Nebraska Lincoln; Nathaniel Hunsu, University of Georgia
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM)
cases hence the use of a collective case study design. Crowe et al. [17] were of theopinion that each individual case should be analyzed separately before conducting a cross-casecomparison to explore the similarities in their perceptions of self-assessment. Drawing on Croweet al. [17], the multiple data sets were coded separately and analyzed using the NVivo dataanalysis software. An inductive thematic analysis was conducted on both data sets. The finalcodebook was conceptualized using both the self-regulation theory [15] and the student self-assessment cycle [3]. The authors completed multiple iterations of coding and engaged in criticalreviews of codes by peer debriefers [16]. Thereafter, a cross-case comparison was conducted toexplore the
Conference Session
Electrical and Computer Engineering Division (ECE) Poster Session
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Tom J. Zajdel, Carnegie Mellon University; Allison E. Connell Pensky, Carnegie Mellon University
Tagged Divisions
Electrical and Computer Engineering Division (ECE)
Paper ID #38654Board 88: Work in Progress: Impact of Electronics Design Experience onNon-majors’ Self-efficacy and IdentityTom J. Zajdel, Carnegie Mellon University Tom Zajdel is an Assistant Teaching Professor in electrical and computer engineering at Carnegie Mellon University. Dr. Zajdel is interested in how students become motivated to study electronics and engineer- ing. He has taught circuits, amateur radio, introductory mechanics, technical writing, and engineering de- sign. Before joining CMU, Tom was a postdoctoral researcher at Princeton University, where he worked on electrical sheep-herding of biological
Conference Session
International Division Technical Session 1: Looking at Study Abroad through an enhanced lens
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jemal Bedane Halkiyo, Arizona State University
domestic students, I shared their thoughts concerning the needs in teachingand learning in the zoom breakout room. With students, I discussed the challenges and benefitsof designing effective instruction for diverse student groups in a teaching and learningenvironment with both international and domestic students. After identifying the needs, andinstructional topic, I decided to develop an inclusive lesson for international graduate students.Then, I shared these ideas to be a base for the lesson topic with classmates.Step 2: I provided a pitch speech on a selected topic, “Traffic Signals Coordination along theStreet,” to my peers in the class. At this stage, I received feedback from classmates and courseprofessors.Step 3: I then designed a video
Conference Session
Technological and Engineering Literacy - Philosophy of Engineering Division Technical Session 3
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Renato Alan Bezerra Rodrigues; Jillian Seniuk Cicek, University of Manitoba; Kari Zacharias, Concordia University; Jeffrey Paul, University of Manitoba
-engineering-through-responsible-innovation-and-critiques-of-engineering-culturesGibbs, J. (2010). Linda L. Putnam and Anne M. Nicotera, eds.: Building Theories of Organization: The Constitutive Role of Communication. Administrative Science Quarterly, 55(1), 159–161. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.2010.55.1.159Green, B. N., Johnson, C. D., & Adams, A. (2006). Writing narrative literature reviews for peer-reviewed journals: secrets of the trade. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine, 5(3), 101–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0899-3467(07)60142-6Irish, R., & Romkey, L. (2021). Using Actor Network Theory to Explore Sustainability Issues in an Engineering & Society Course. In Proceedings of the Canadian