, whenchallenged, has developed elegant solutions through evolutionary processes [1]. We can learnfrom nature, borrowing its features and characteristics to advance technology. Nature can serveas a model, measure, and mentor [2].Engineers and designers have a constant curiosity to improve the quality of life. One source ofcuriosity and inspiration is nature. Biomimicry introduces what we can learn from nature and notjust extract from her. Recognizing that pollution and environmental destruction as well aslimited natural resources will impact human survival, Hwang et al.[3] proffer that biomimicrycan produce better outcomes for engineering and technology development compared withsynthetic methods and those that are guided by nature.Biomimicry as a
modified in the first year introductory civilengineering course in fall 2020, due in part to the COVID pandemic which required the course tobe taught online. One framing principle in the course was the idea of human centered design forinfrastructure, which allowed the diverse array of topics covered in the course to have somecohesiveness. As part of the ethics and sustainability modules in the course, students were askedto read assigned material and watch segments of the ASEE community panel video on their owntime, then answer a series of questions as part of the associated homework assignments. Becausethe course was 1-credit, the intent was for the assigned reading, video, and assignment to takeabout 2 hours of student time outside of class for
, and the creationof an environment committed to inclusive excellence, will result in very strong student outcomes. 1INTRODUCTIONThe importance of community colleges to STEM education, and in particular to the education ofengineers, is a critical and increasingly studied strand within the higher education researchlandscape. More than twenty percent (20%) of all engineering baccalaureate students complete atleast 10 credits at a community college [1]. Thirty-eight percent (38%) of engineering graduatesattend community college at some point [2, 3]. Currently, more than 41% of all students in highereducation in the US are enrolled at a community
expand the number of students who can benefit from conducting research as the designprojects are embedded directly into the curriculum and are taken by all students in the program.Undergraduate research has been shown to help students take ownership of their own learningand helps them to see the real-world relevance of research as they learn problem-solving skills[1 – 3]. Inquiry-based projects are beneficial because they require a significant investment ofstudent time and effort over an extended period with frequent constructive feedback from facultyand regular opportunities for reflection [4, 5]. This paper addresses the process of developmentof performance indicators and presents the results of assessment and evaluation of both ETACABET and
understanding of engineering ethics, it should be woven throughout thecurriculum, included in multiple courses and discussed in terms of real-life scenarios. TheAccreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) requires all engineering disciplinesto consider public health and welfare [1]. While ethics lessons within engineering curriculum areimportant for all students, it is possible that some student recognize the social implications of theirwork more than others.In this study, we aim to understand the differences in ethical development among students basedon sociodemographic factors. In April 2020, we deployed a survey to undergraduate students attwo universities to assess ethical development using the Defining Issues Test-2 (DIT-2
LEDrate We believe by associating the practices and Emergency Bag Lighttechnicalities of renewable energy with fun, The Smart Solar LED Emergency Bag Light willinteresting hands-on projects, and resources, we are store energy from sunlight gathered during the dayprovided the ability to educate these generations on and assist the user in finding items they need fromone of the most essential and beneficial skills that their bags or purses when in a dimly lit room or darkwill most assuredly be sought after in future years. area. This model requires the following parts: When we embarked upon this journey we had no • (1) 5-volt/220-mA solar panelidea what challenges and/or learning experienceswe
visualization class with about 60students. Students interacted with our tool for eight weeks. We performed an interview study tounderstand students’ experience and attitudes towards using such an automated feedback tool forpracticing spatial visualization skills. Through a grounded theory approach, we identified themesthat informed our future improvement of the tool. We discuss the future design of sketchingfeedback tools in spatial visualization training in general.IntroductionSpatial visualization skills, the ability to understand the visual and spatial relationship amongobjects, are among the strongest predictors of future success in STEM coursework and STEMcareers. Through longitudinal studies, Wei et al. [1] and Shea et al. [2] have shown that
International University (FIU). Her research interests span the fields of educa- tional data mining, machine learning optimization, and data science. Leila also received an M.S. degree in Management of Advanced Information Systems, in addition to her B.S. and M.S. degrees in Computer Science.Dr. Monique S. Ross, Florida International University Monique Ross, Assistant Professor in the School of Computing and Information Sciences and STEM Transformation Institute at Florida International University, designs research focused on broadening par- ticipation in computer science through the exploration of: 1) race, gender, and disciplinary identity; 2) discipline-based education research (with a focus on computer science and
this time of global disruption.IntroductionSociety has faced many threats, but none is more significant and complex than the currentpandemic due to the novel coronavirus. Among the many economic and social impacts of thispandemic, the impact on education is the most critical as it is the fundamental base to prepare thecurrent generation for the unknown future. COVID-19 has become one of the most significantchallenges that the education system has faced before due to the need to transition teaching to aremote environment [1]. At the university level, institutions across the nation closed their doorsto students, and some even stopped their research. For example, Boise State University [2]moved all its courses online and put research on hold to
Behrend hasidentified the Statics course as one of the major factors for delayed graduation in that major. As aprerequisite for other required courses, a setback in that class can severely limit the amount ofschedulable engineering courses. A student must be able to pass Statics by the end of theirfourth semester in order to graduate from the ME program within four years.In addition to retention issues caused by current students, the Behrend School of Engineering hasseen a drop in enrollment over the past few years. Although some may be attributed to morestudents opting to complete their degree at the University Park campus, the overall forecast forPennsylvania is a steep enrollment decline through 2026 due to declining birthrates [1]. In
assistant instructor in the University of Texas at Austin for five years.Mr. Paul Mittan, Penn State Engineering Leadership Development American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 1 Evaluating the Effectiveness of an Undergraduate Engineering Leadership Development Minor on GraduatesAbstractLeadership development programs aim to meet the professional development needs of ourgraduates while aligning program curriculum to the needs of our graduates’ employers. Thisresearch paper reports assessment results from a
overall goal of the improved game system is to improve student comprehension and classroom results. Additionally, the finished system is planned to be fully automated, requiring no intervention from instructors or researchers. Assessments of the effectiveness of the game system will be shown through the following: 1. Student game performance. 2. Student performance on content tests related to the game content. 3. Student lab work performance. 4. Student surveys.1. AcknowledgementThis work was supported in part by the National Science Foundation under Grant 1913809.2. IntroductionMajor research within higher education focuses on the divide between discovery-based studentlearning and directly
spacefor all students in engineering programs.IntroductionRecruiting and retaining diverse talents, including women, underrepresented minorities, andpersons with disabilities within engineering disciplines has been long recognized as essential tokeep our nation’s economic and intellectual preeminence (Public Law 105-255, approved on Oct14, 1998) [1]. In 2000, the Congressional Commission on the Advancement of Women andMinorities in Science, Engineering and Technology development reported that “a culturallydiverse workforce creates competitive advantage through greater creativity and innovation;increased organizational flexibility thanks to higher levels of divergent thinking; and betterdecision making based on multiple perspectives (less “group
Technology (ABET) accreditation criteria forengineering programs that took effect in the 2019–2020 accreditation cycle [1] reflect an increasedemphasis in having engineering graduates that are prepared to participate in the development ofcomplex products and systems.The wide array of knowledge, skills, and abilities (KSAs) desired in engineering professionals isevident in references such as the Engineering Competency Model jointly developed by theAmerican Association of Engineering Societies (AAES) and the US Department of Labor (DoL),the CDIO (Conceive Design Implement Operate) Syllabus 2.0 proposed by the CDIO organization,and the U. S. Department of Defense Systems Engineering Career Competency Model [2-5]. Someof the listed KSAs [2-5] highlight
, students, administrators,and staff, nor was the idea of emergency remote teaching and distance learning. Nearly all collegesand universities worldwide, including the nearly 5300 in the United States, were quicklytransitioning into a completely new state of operation with remote learning and work becomingthe norm. This extraordinary event created uncertainty and anxiety regarding the end of the currentschool year and upcoming educational offerings for the next [1]. Although there is still insufficientdata to evaluate the impact on historically black universities operations, the decision for immediatetransition, to create, and implement online teaching due to university closures is highly felt byinstructors and underrepresented populations of
teachers. During a five-week programstudent-teacher pairs completed research projects within one of our faculty’s research labs. Inaddition, teacher and student teams completed the “Wearable Device Challenge” (WDC), anengineering design project that challenges teams to design and build a wearable device to addressan issue at the intersection of human, animal, and environmental health [1].The in-person program included teachers and rising junior and senior high school students.Participants met in a flexible classroom space on campus two days a week and spent time in theirfaculty’s labs for in-person research three days out of the week. In this traditional teachingenvironment, it was straightforward to bring in lecturers, go on tours of campus
residential program, EPIC provides participants with the opportunity to experience campuslife so they can begin envisioning themselves as college students. Counselors are current collegeengineering students serving as role models for program participants.Participants in the residential program take part in eight 2-hour engineering labs over the courseof the week. Each lab focuses on a specific engineering field giving participants a samplerunderstanding in the different disciplines of engineering. The labs are primarily taught byCalifornia Polytechnic State University faculty and cover a range of engineering topics andactivities such as nanotechnology, scribbler robots (Figure 1), welding (Figure 2), soldering,phone apps, building bridges, launching
technology that can support long established models foreffective pedagogy.IntroductionIn January of 2017, Oregon Institute of Technology’s Commission on College Teachingsuccessfully adapted the American Society of Civil Engineering’s Excellence in CivilEngineering (ExCEEd) Teaching Workshop [1]. Using the foundation of the ExCEEd model[2], a teaching workshop was developed to provide participants with 13 seminars and twodemonstration classes that incorporate principles of successful higher educational instruction.An important component of the workshop is that participants immediately apply the conceptslearned throughout the workshop.Prior to the coronavirus pandemic of 2020, the Commission on College Teaching was workingon expanding its successful
to the control group (p = 0.042).Figure 1: Leadership Self-Efficacy (LSE). LDP students’ post program LSE results showed increased self-efficacy compared to both pre-program and control group.5.00 Very High Self-Efficacy 4.314.00 3.99 4.10 LDP3.00 Control2.00 N (pre-post) = 18 N (control) = 541.00 Very Low Self-Efficacy Pre PostFigure 2: Motivation to Lead (MTL). LDP students’ post program MTL results showed a smallincrease in motivation compared to both pre
-structuredinterviews with around 20 faculty across the university. The interviews included discussions of thepedagogy’s faculty used within their newly designed courses, who faculty interacted with and howthey gained the ethical and intercultural competencies, and the challenges faculty faced inredesigning the courses. Preliminary results have found that some of the more common challengesthat faculty are facing is the lack of institutional guidance and resources, the lack of support fromother faculty, and a lack of time to implement the required changes. Moving forward, we plan toexpand this study to reinterview faculty as the program progresses and faculty learn more abouthow to teach in online settings. 1. Introduction Ethical and global
in students’ use of sources, and howcourse design can incorporate effective asynchronous online delivery in diverse models.IntroductionAs the COVID-19 pandemic spread globally and governments began instituting large-scalelockdowns, academic institutions were faced with a new challenge: how to continue to providehigh quality educational services when students and faculty were unable to leave their homes.Educators were asked to move their teaching materials online in weeks or even days, oftenlacking prior experience with online learning or the one-on-one support of overburdenedinstructional design experts [1], [2]. Students have been asked to continue their education underthe assumption that these methods are an adequate substitute for
Challenges [1] and “Transition to Scale” challenge in Grand ChallengesCanada [2], require technical solutions that can only be developed through collaboration withininterdisciplinary teams. For these collaborations to effectively harness the diverse capabilities ofthese teams, effective technical leadership must be deployed.While the education system has worked to increase graduation rates of technical professionals--such as engineers—there are persistent demands from industry to improve professional skillcompetencies [1], [2]. This NSF-funded project has worked to bridge this gap by developing adata-driven understanding of how undergraduate engineers develop as leaders through the lens ofidentity constructs [3]. An exploration of the project’s
efficacy of exam wrappers for reflective learning has been established inSTEM disciplines such as physics, biology, chemistry, and math. Very little research in usingexam wrappers in engineering and computing courses has been conducted to date. Twocontributions of this paper are (1) a characterization of the recent findings in engineering andcomputing education literature on the efficacy of exam wrappers, and (2) an analysis of thequestion types used on those exam wrappers. A third contribution of the paper is an examinationof the efficacy of exam wrappers in an upper-level computer science course. The studyinvestigates the relationship between student performance on two midterm exams before andafter introducing exam wrappers. Student responses
transfer students and a relatively smaller increase inpersistence intentions of students working full-time than other students.IntroductionOnline education is witnessing an extensive rise in student enrollment [1-2]. Online education alsocontinues to experience higher percentage of dropouts than the in-person face-to-face programs[3-5]. Several reasons for students dropping out from the online courses/programs have beendocumented, including feeling isolated [6], challenges with balancing academics and personaldemands [7-9], inadequate faculty and peer support [6][9-10], challenges with technology [7][11],and lack of engagement [7][11-12]. Course designs that engage students through course materialsand through communications with peers and
, civil,biomedical, electrical, and mechanical engineering [1-7]. Considered a critical instructionalstrategy for aiding students in developing durable professional “soft” skills [8, 9], team-basedlearning involves collaborative interactions among students to achieve a common design goal.To be sure, the ability to function on teams and communicate effectively are two process skillsthat all engineering students should acquire as a result of completing a post-secondary programof study in engineering [10]. In engineering, team-based learning often occurs through product orprocess design projects. While the details of team-based design projects may vary by discipline,in general, they have three features. First, they present an open-ended problem to
potential is still attributed to these technologies, only a limited number of studiesdocument effective and pedagogically informed use cases [1]. Furthermore, many facultiesstill seem to avoid such technologies altogether, as they see them to be too complex foradoption in parallel to the daily running teaching business [2], [3]. At least VR, AR, and MRtechnologies have not yet made their way into the group of everyday instructionaltechnologies like learning management systems or even online course delivery tools. Hence,most of the documented introduction of AR, VR, and MR so far is more on the level ofcontext specific case studies e.g. [4], [5].In contrast to the afore-mentioned reluctance in widely adopting the described technologies,for those
revisions to that institution through the radical lens oftheir queerness. Two participants left the STEM institution due to discrimination based on theirGRSM experiences, whereas the other two are still embedded in engineering environments. Eachparticipant describes their experiences with power and privilege with regard to theirsubjectivities and those of their superiors, as well as reimagine the STEM institution through thebeginnings of a revolutionary Queer praxis (or, theory into practice).IntroductionHistorically, the STEM institution gained traction during World War II when the United Stateswas in need of engineering and weapons research in order to establish itself as a global power[1]–[4]. This capitalistic history of STEM is still present
interests include the role of librarians in engineering education, entrepreneurship, and the role of technical industry standards in academic libraries. She holds the Master of Library Science from the University at Buffalo and a B.A. degree in Communication from SUNY Geneseo. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Examining the Teaching Needs of Engineering Faculty: How the Library and Librarian Fit InAbstractTeaching is a common responsibility among many subject librarians [1], as is supporting facultyin their own teaching pursuits [2]. However, what this support looks like can vary greatlydepending on the academic area
improving the course contents(both theory and lab). For comparison purposes, the contents of a similar course developed at adifferent university is also provided in this study.IntroductionAdditive Manufacturing (AM) is an emerging technology that encompasses numerous threedimensional (3D) printing technologies for joining materials layer by layer to make objects from3D computer-aided design (CAD) model data [1]. Through AM technology, complex geometricshapes, multi-material and multi-functional parts can be additively manufactured in a singleoperation which is a big advantage over conventional manufacturing processes. Over the past twodecades, the intensive research carried out on AM technologies has yielded significant progress inthe development
institutional effectiveness. His work with MIDFIELD includes research on obstacles students face that interfere with degree completion and, as well, how institutional policies affect degree programs. His group’s work on transfer students, grade inflation, and issues faced across gender and ethnicity have caused institutions to change policies so that they may improve. Awards and publications may be found at https://engineering.purdue.edu/people/russell.a.long.1.Dr. Richard A. Layton, Layton Data Display Richard A. Layton is Professor Emeritus of Mechanical Engineering at Rose-Hulman Institute of Tech- nology. He received a B.S. from California State University, Northridge, and an M.S. and Ph.D. from the University of