of a class meeting was dedicated to solving these problems, in part, througha think-pair-share2 instructional approach. For think-pair-share, students were given 30 secondsto read the problem, 1 minute to think and discuss solutions to the problem with their peers, andseveral minutes to discuss the different solution strategies in the class as a whole. Students orallyshared with the class alternative ways to solve problems. Students completed four formativequizzes in class (consisting of FE-type problems) on material that had been covered up to thatpoint, as well as homework problem sets throughout the semester. The target exam, which willhenceforth be referred to as the mock-FE exam, was constructed by chemical engineering1 https
answered bythe researcher. The cadets were briefed on the observation exercise. This exercise requiredthem to log virtuous acts they observed during their everyday activities. This passive exercisedid not require any type of interaction on the part of the cadet. Cadets received a start and enddate for the observation exercise. The researcher answered all questions from the cadets.After the five-day observation exercise, a post survey was filled out and after-action review(AAR) questions were answered. The format of the AAR questions was free form andallowed cadets to write what they felt and provide feedback on how to improve the study (seeAAR Questions section). An AAR is conducted after events with the purpose of improvingfuture exercises.The
an introduction to engineering designcourse during the fall semester. This course consists of a twice-weekly, one-hour lecture and atwo-hour laboratory. The lecture on Monday mainly focuses on engineering topics related totwo interactive team projects. Guest lectures are presented on Wednesday. These lecturesrepresent the various engineering majors offered at Binghamton University. The laboratories aretaught by engineering instructors and graduate engineering students. Students are also requiredto take a weekly two-hour course with a focus on writing and oral presentations. The courseprovides instruction to students on how to write reports and present oral presentations regardingtheir projects. Both courses utilize undergraduate course
InquiryThroughout the larger effort described above, our team of five became acutely aware of thechallenges we faced as individuals and a collective in attempting to utilize design thinking in amore traditional engineering course design context. Certainly there were successes, inspiringmoments, and personal growth. There were also moments of doubt, conflict, and even despair aswe considered our experiences and the potential to expand those experiences to our peers. Thuswe decided to investigate the tensions we were experiencing in bringing design thinking to ourdistinct course design context.We utilized a collaborative inquiry [15] approach to investigate the tensions we experienced andhow they informed our application of design thinking in engineering
G141210 8 6 4 2 0 Agree Neutral Disagree I want to use Mastering in the rest of this course. I like the instant feedback on the Mastering platform. I like the fact that I am challenged in problems with different parameters from my peers to really show that I understand the concept and I can apply it. I love writing down my steps on paper while solving the problems on Mastering online. I feel that I can learn better (in the sense that I can solve harder problems or am aware of more knowledge points that I might have overlooked before) with more integration of Mastering into my course. I
additional experiencesto share during their capstone experiences. The resulting evidence of DT use was measured inthe final reports that senior students write at the end of their capstone experiences.MethodsBioengineering students who completed one of two elective courses in Biodesign and/orparticipated in a Summer Clinical Immersion were considered exposed to the intervention. TheBiodesign courses were new electives and we intended them to be open to many students. Assuch, they did not have extensive pre-requisites (Calculus II, Physics, and our Intro toEngineering course). The students who enrolled in these courses had an interest indesign/building devices, the class fit their schedule, or this was the one elective whose pre-requisites they met
@iupui.edu raj.s@austin.utexas.eduAbstractIn this full research paper, we aim to enhance the instructional delivery of the CIT 21400(Introduction to Data Management) course at IUPUI to improve students’ learning experience andto engage students better as they learn and apply the foundational database concepts. Introductoryprogramming courses such as database programming and design represent crucial milestones inIT education, as they reflect students' ability to solve problems and design appropriate solutions.But, for novice programmers learning SQL (Structured Query Language) programming andlogical database design concepts is a challenging task because while writing SQL programs,students not only have to apply
Summer 2022. After opening the DesignCube, students are able not only to access commontools and material for their prototyping activities, but they can also move freely from oneworkstation to another to engage, brainstorm and discuss with peers. There is also storage roomfor prototypes. Figure 10: Students inside Makerere DesignCubeFigures 10 and 11: Summer Program Participants with the DesignCubeStudents from both schools have had the opportunity to collaborate on biomedical designprojects in the Makerere DesignCube (Figure 10). Eight Duke students travelled to Makerere inSummer 2022 through a DukeEngage program, a service-learning program where
extended to similarly innate forms of neurodivergence, thusly: bysituating similarly these forms of neurodivergence as something one can ‘have,’ person-firstlanguage perpetuates the idea that neurodivergence can always be separated from the self – andtherefore removed or ‘cured.’Steps towards the neurodiversity paradigmThe earliest instance of neurodiv* term use I found in the EER literature was in an articlepublished in 2015, three years after Walker first introduced the neurodiversity paradigm inpublished writing [2] and one year after she first posted “Neurodiversity: Some Basic Terms &Definitions” online [6]. Though all analyzed articles were published after these important works,none directly referenced Walker, and none were entirely
which can be found in Appendix B.Students were placed in different groups for the two activities. Each instructor provided feedbackfor all groups in both activities.An initial brainstorming exercise was completed at the very start of the program, where studentswere asked to work in groups and write on post-it notes in response to the following prompt:“About 50% of neonatal (newborn) deaths worldwide are due to hypothermia. Some reasonsinclude that newborns lack sufficient body fat and metabolic rates to maintain body temperature.Brainstorm: 1. Possible approaches to avoid hypothermia-related neonatal deaths in developingcountries. 2. What additional information do you need?” [8].The final direct assessment was made by evaluating student
Paper ID #38078A Self-Study of Faculty Methods, Attitudes, and Perceptions of OralEngineering ExamsDr. Darcie Christensen, Minnesota State University, Mankato Dr. Darcie Christensen is a probationary Assistant Professor in the Department of Integrated Engineering at Minnesota State University Mankato. She teaches for Iron Range Engineering, which is located at the Minnesota North Campus in Virginia, MN. Dr. Christensen received her Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Utah State University in the Summer of 2021. The title of her Dissertation is ”A Mixed-Method Approach to Explore Student Needs for Peer Mentoring in a College
, many researchers and educators areinvestigating anxiety interventions and their effects on student outcomes in science andengineering courses to improve student outcomes for underrepresented groups in STEM[12–15].For instance, Harris et al. tested the effectiveness of test anxiety interventions such as expressivewriting and reappraising physiological arousal on exam performance [13]. They found that theseinterventions, though they did not change the level of self-reported test anxiety in students, didincrease exam performance. Other studies have similarly shown that expressive writing exercisescan be effective in increasing cognitive abilities, particularly when performing problems requiringa high working memory [14]. Many other studies have
. Essentially, as acommunication platform itself, Zoom allows us to be “hands-on” with these topics. Wedeveloped such interactive exercises on topics including multi-level signaling, MIMO, mediumaccess control and network routing.In this paper, we will describe our experiences with implementing a set of such remotely-taughtlessons on wireless communication and networking offered to high school students. Thesecombine write-ups and interactive Zoom sessions that leverage Zoom features to engage studentsand have them experiment with the lesson concepts. Even after schools return to in-personlearning, these sessions could serve as the basis for remote summer camps or after-schoolprograms that could introduce communications concepts to high school students
Podcasts Questionnaire” (SSEPQ), as proposed by[12], was used. The questionnaire, validated by its creators, consisted of 10 Likert-type items thatevaluate student's perception regarding learning podcasts and their content adequacy, ease of use,usefulness and benefits (See Appendix). This SSEPQ questionnaire, having five response optionsranging from “strongly disagree” to “strongly agree”, was distributed by email to students toanswer. In addition to the SSEPQ questionnaire itself, students were invited to freely write downany further comments in an open-ended format.In order to further inquire upon students' perception regarding the general working strategyproposed (FC + P strategy), a survey known as “Student Response to Instructional Practices
Engineer of 2020 attributes. This study will also be ofinterest to educators considering how the attributes described in 2004 remain relevant in 2020and may spark conversation about how these attributes may need to be adjusted in the future.The study will be of particular interest to those responsible for recommending and implementingcurricular changes in engineering programs.BackgroundThe report titled The Engineer of 2020, published in 2004, is a product of the National Academyof Engineering[1]. The committee responsible for writing the document included 18 people: 12affiliated with academic institutions, 4 affiliated with technology-based companies (IBM, HP,Telcordia, and Reliant Energy), 1 affiliated with a national laboratory (Sandia), and 1
and networking as well as teaching basics in Java programming language and hands-on exercises on Raspberry Pi.4. The Mobile Programming (1.5 weeks) covered mobile operating systems and hands-on experiences on writing Android programs accessing the web. Figure 3: Overview of RET Site: CoMET ProgramSelected module highlights. In the Design and Fabrication of Environmental Sensors Module, ateam of teachers from middle and high schools participated in the design, fabrication andcharacterization of electrochemical sensors that can be used for water quality monitoring. Inorder to establish the knowledge basis for their activities, a faculty mentor provided a series ofshort course lectures each day before teachers
. She is an Associate Editor for the ”Journal of American Indian Education” and has authored or edited three books and numerous articles in peer reviewed national and international journals. Her most recent edited volume was published in 2019 and is called ”The Price of Nice: How Good Intentions Maintain Educa- tional Inequity.”Dr. Ricky Camplain Ricky Camplain, PhD is an assistant professor of Health Sciences and the Center for Health Equity Re- search at Northern Arizona University. Dr. Camplain is a Comanche scholar who was trained in epidemio- logic methods at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Gillings School of Global Public Health where I received a Master of Science in Public Health (MSPH
felt the learning gainswere less because students were “missing the point” of the labs, as “we're not interested in whatyou got as a result. We are more interested in knowing why you've got what you got.” This couldmean that a targeted pedagogical training intervention specific to online-specific strategies topromote deeper, more critical thinking might be useful to GLAs and increase their self-perception of their role [6]. Strong peer support and a mentor system might also help relievesome of the pressure from adjusting quickly to a new role as a result of the transition tohybrid/online labs [14].Table 1: Salient themes from the graduate perspective and supporting quotes 1) Lack of “The interaction with students in the online
graduate schooltraining, which socializes future faculty toward traditional definitions of scholarship that remaindeeply held: that scholars create new knowledge for academic communities and demonstratetheir expertise in writing; and that discovery research is harder and requires more expertise thanteaching or service [24] [37]. In a multi-institutional case study of reform institutions, O’Mearacharacterized a “culture war” around decisions about promotion to full professor, wrapped up ininstitutional self-image and values of prestige associated with traditional scholarship [24].Ratcheting up of research expectations to improve rankings has also been identified as asignificant barrier [37]. In addition, CAOs have reported difficulty in expanding
Martin (2005;2007) presented above. In this case adaptive expertise was assessed in terms of knowledge,conceptual understanding, and ability to transfer knowledge. Three class problems were used in apre/post study that examined these dimensions. Students who received instruction based on theSTAR Legacy format showed improved conceptual understanding and improved ability totransfer knowledge relative to peers taught in a non-challenge-based approach.Design Engineering: Design scenarios have been successfully used as a method to facilitate thedevelopment of adaptive expertise in engineering students (Walker, 2006). These scenarios,representing a form of problem-based instruction, are offered to students who are then left totackle the problem
Sexuality Studies at Oregon State University. Her research interests are in feminist pedagogies, social justice education, and history.Dr. Qwo-Li Driskill, Oregon State University Qwo-Li Driskill is an Associate Professor in Women, Gender, and Sexuality Studies at Oregon State University. The hold a PhD in Rhetoric & Writing from Michigan State University.Prof. Rebecca L. Warner, Oregon State University Rebecca Warner is Professor Sociology in the School of Public Policy at Oregon Sate University.Dr. Susan M. Shaw, Oregon State University Dr. Susan M. Shaw is professor of Women, Gender, and Sexuality Studies at Oregon State University and a co-PI on the NSF ADVANCE Institutional Transformation grant at the
topic of student success andretention at the undergraduate level, and it has been found that in addition to prior demonstrationof academic success (e.g., high school GPA, SAT scores, and other academic achievements), amain factor in determining student success at the college level was student motivation.9In an effort to enhance student motivation, some engineering schools have made changes to theirprogram’s digital and physical infrastructure to keep up with the rapidly evolving technologiesand learning styles of the modern engineering student. For example, New Mexico StateUniversity (NMSU) has implemented a new first year program at their institution, with a focuson PBL, flipped classroom instruction, and peer mentoring.10 Programs such as
Statics and Mechanics of Materials and motivatesthe groups to write their lines. Once complete, each group leaves the classroom to record theirlyrics (which must be appropriate) and then uploads the videos to an online file drive. When allthe teams are done, the class watches the videos. I then have a rap of my own to share live,dramatically revealing my ‘dyed’ Eminem style hair (Figure 1a) and then rapping the entirecourse outline. The major learning objective for the day is for students to become comfortabletalking in front of their peers and not being afraid to ask any questions, because as I say, “onceyou have rapped in front of each other, how hard is asking a question?”Greek Rush DayThe value for this theme is its applicability to many STEM
ESPTs and in engineering praxis, they experience apowerfully rich and authentic identity, they experience becoming an engineer.In the following, we used three cases, that is, three women participants (Nickie, Bhee, and Annie– all pseudonyms) to illustrate the overall thematic findings noted in the passage above.Nickie is a member of an upper middleclass family with two parents (neither of whom areengineers), one sister and two brothers. She was born in the northeastern part of the UnitedStates. She differentiated herself from the other members of her family, “I was probably the leastathletic person ever, so I had to find other things….” She enjoyed reading, writing and drawing.“I became very artistic … and “was super curious” about space
writing. Each program hasa cognizant WIMS faculty or staff member who has responsibility for the educationalinstruction and overall management of the program.For in-school and teacher education initiatives, the WIMS Education Program has formedpartnerships with the K-12 school districts of Ann Arbor, Houghton/Hancock, Okemos andEast Lansing area schools, and DAPCEP (Detroit Area Pre-College Engineering Program, anacademic outreach program associated with Detroit schools), and with university-level outreach Page 12.1330.3organizations. Other individual schools that have partnered with WIMS are Grand Rapids HighSchool, Cass Tech High
Development. In addition, she has developed numerous tools to mentor young women considering engineering as a career and has been involved in the development of a women in engineering role model book for K-12 students.Patricia Carlson, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology PATRICIA A. CARLSON is professor of rhetoric at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. She is a long-time advocate of writing in engineering education. Carlson has been a National Research Council Senior Fellow for the U. S. Air Force, as well as having had several research fellowships with NASA (Langley and Goddard) and the Army's Aberdeen Proving Ground. She has also been a research fellow at NASA's Classroom
the group write down the proceedings (and thus not 8participate) or stop the proceedings to write down what has happened thus far. These “digitaldocuments” are easily shared among group members and the faculty advisor if necessary.Once the brainstorming and conceptual analysis is complete the students have to decide whichconcept best meets the project specifications and should be carried forward to detail design -Phase 3. Each alternative is ranked using a rational methodology, such as Pugh’s method [1],and from the ranking make a recommendation as to which concept best meets the designspecifications and should go forward to detail design. Normally the industrial sponsor would beinvolved at this
going to the environmental engineering conference, regardless of their own field, especially given that they are still undergraduates3. List the top three things that you learned (within and outside of your discipline) duringthis program. • Important – Should have a presentation on how to give presentations, i.e., PowerPoint, Communications • Bacterial source tracking and methodology • Presenting research • How broadly something like water uses the skills of so many academic fields • Research in general as what I want to do • How to go about research • How to present • How to write a research paper • Learn about a new area of a field (geology) • Learning to present chemistry to non-chemists
security.John K. Estell, Ohio Northern University John K. Estell is Chair of the Electrical & Computer Engineering and Computer Science Department, and Professor of Computer Engineering and Computer Science, at Ohio Northern University. He received his doctorate from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. His areas of research include simplifying the outcomes assessment process, user interface design, and the pedagogical aspects of writing computer games. Dr. Estell is a Senior Member of IEEE, and a member of ACM, ASEE, Tau Beta Pi, Eta Kappa Nu, and Upsilon Pi Epsilon.Brenda Hart, University of Louisville Professor Hart is the director of student affairs in the School of Engineering
understandings of the ABET skills and how they maybe expressed in student team performance, set program outcomes or performance benchmarks,apply results to teaching improvements, and track longitudinal growth. It also offers richopportunities for faculty development and collaboration with industry professionals. Thecurricular debrief method can also be used as a teaching tool, so that students can practice theirABET professional skills in just one class period, gaining insight from faculty and peer feedback.The Scoring Tool: Guide to Assessing ABET Professional SkillsFirst, a rubric to be used as the rating tool was developed for the ABET professional skills.“Rubrics are scoring guides that describe the various levels of student performance for a