it with common mechanicscalculations to determine an experimental parameter.Depending on the nature of the flex period, the class may meet in the regular classroom oranother facility such as a specialized classroom intended to facilitate group work, or adepartment laboratory. Depending on the activity, students may work individually or morefrequently, in groups of varying sizes. Page 26.780.5 Table 3 – Flex Period Schedule for Semester Flex Meeting Exercise/Activity Topic(s) Period #a # 1 3 Small group work including simple Engineering Measurements and
, community,or other source, contextual listening has a broader meaning. It refers to A multidimensional, integrated understanding of the listening process wherein listening facilitates meaning making, enhances human potential, and helps foster community-supported change. In this form of listening, information such as cost, weight, technical specs, desirable functions, and timeline acquires meaning only when the context of the person(s) making the requirements (their history, political agendas, desires, forms of knowledge, etc.) is fully understood [19, p. 125].Although students in IFCS did not engage with an actual community, the posing of the tankproblem underscored the value of listening to a community to
of the fourinstitutions. These styles are characterized by the student’s desire to begin a task alone and thenevolve into a different mode of studying as the task progresses toward completion. We call thefirst of these two Start alone styles: Start alone, End together. This pattern of studying tends tofocus on a formal agreement among students to come together at a preset time(s) to discussdifficulties, compare answers, and engage in other benefits of collective effort. The secondvariation, Start alone, End almost together, while similar in philosophy to Start alone, Endtogether, tends to be more casual and less structured. In this pattern of studying, studentstypically agree with a group of other students to begin a task on their own, and
. UAA degree and certificate awards by ethnicity, FY2011-2012. (2012).2. Frehill, L. M., Di Fabio, N. M. & Hill, S. T. Confronting the “new” American dilemma: Underrepresented minorities in engineering: A data-based look at diversity. 1–109 (2008).3. National Action Council for Minorities in Engineering. American Indians in engineering. NACME Res. Policy 2, 1–2 (2012).4. National Science Board. Science and engineering indicators 2010. (2010).5. University of Alaska Fairbanks. University of Alaska Fairbanks fall 2012 fact sheet. (2012). at 6. University of Alaska Southeast. UAS certificate, endorsement, and degree completions. (2012).7. STEM integration in K–12 education: Status, prospects, and an agenda for
study, we are defining “informal engineering programs” as activities, resources, andevents that occur outside of a school setting, which children can engage in alone or with others,on their own time outside of school. Such programs may be self-regulated, assisted by a parent,or led by an informal educator (e.g., a camp counselor).The Informal Pathways to Engineering StudyTo answer our research questions, we created a longitudinal study following 60 middle schoolstudents in two states. 10 of these students are not traditionally schooled. 8 students are currentlyhomeschooled by their parent(s) and 2 students attend virtual public schools and have instructorswho are not their parents. (We defined homeschool students as students who do not attend
communication as their 1particular mode of autopoietic reproduction” (p. 3) As leading systems theorists Capra andLuisi[9] described: [Because] communications recur in multiple feedback loops, they produce a shared system of beliefs, explanations, and values – a common context of meaning – that is continually sustained by further communications (p. 308).Applying this theory to systems of higher learning, we argue that the social life (or “culture(s)”)of engineering colleges and departments is maintained by a network of communications fromwhich messages or stories emerge that reflect this “common context of meaning”. What, then,are these
experience,perception, cognition, and behavior.1 For this model to be successful the learner must: activelybe involved in that experience (concrete experience), reflect on that experience (reflectiveobservation), conceptualize the experience (abstract conceptualization), and apply what waslearned to new experiences (active experimentation).1Experiential learning is a component of education that “emphasize[s] the central role thatexperience play in the learning process.”1 As explained by Hey, Van Pelt, Agogino, andBeckman, some areas, such as practical and teamwork skills that are important in engineeringdesign education, are best taught through experience instead of through formal lectures.5In that regard, experiential learning has many benefits
efforts to change instruction in STEM education.Acknowledgements This paper is based on research funded by the National Science Foundation under Awardnumber DUE 1245194. Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed inthis material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation.This research is conducted under our university IRB protocol 4532.References[1] Association of American Universities (AAU). (2006). National Defense Education and Innovative Initiative: Meeting America’s Economic and Security Challenges of the 21st Century. Washington, DC.[2] Beach, A., Henderson, C., & Finkelstein, N. (2012). Facilitating change in undergraduate STEM education
Theysuggested alternative, non-linear models whose chief merit would be the opportunity to regaincontrol over assigning meaning and value to one’s career, on one’s own terms, not theorganization’s.21 The question emerges, then, of what career socialization looks like given theincreased personal agency advocated by Buzzanell and Goldzwig in the face of the broadchanges identified by Sullivan and others.16One avenue for answering this question is to explore the discourses surrounding mentoring. Inher review of the literature, Jacobi defined mentoring as a personal, reciprocal relationshipbetween a protégé and someone of greater experience or accomplishment who helps the protégétoward some achievement(s) by providing psychological/emotional support
and finalize the document.Assessment HistoryThe assessment of proposals and reports has evolved significantly over the past two decades.During the first few years of the program, the proposals and reports were reviewed by the faculty Page 26.1747.3advisor alone. The advisor gave feedback to the team on areas to improve. The designcoordinator reviewed all proposals for consistency and major flaws. No rubric was available forassessment. Course grades were subjective and decided by the faculty advisor and the designcoordinator.In early 1990’s the engineering department faculty members developed a document with the helpof an English department
arebelow: Best Practices in Recruiting International Students that emerged from Özturgut (2013)’s study on international student recruitment are: 1. Providing academic support and utilizing campus resources; 2. Attending and participating in international education fairs and recruitment events; 3. Partnering with other organizations for recruiting (colleges and universities, non-profit and governmental institutions, high schools, for-profit organizations); 4. Passive Marketing such as web advertising- online, brochures and booklets, and others; 5. Utilizing staff and faculty; 6. Utilizing alumni; 7. Utilizing agents; and 8. Snowballing or word-of-mouth [3]. Best Practices in Retaining International Students that emerged from the
, disciplinary affiliation(s), gender, non-engineering degrees in background, additional administrative roles (Deans, Directors), and institutional characteristics. 2. How are the characteristics of LTS faculty different from other engineering faculty? a. It is hypothesized that LTS faculty might be different than other engineering faculty, since differences have been found among the students who engage in LTS; for example, women might be over-represented among LTS faculty compared to engineering faculty overall. b. The demographic characteristics for LTS faculty were identified to answer research question 1. The characteristics for engineering faculty overall were taken
designss,models, and a other intterventions, who benefitts? Who doe s not benefitt? Who suffeers?Engineerrs are increassingly recognizing the neeed to effecttively engagge communitties [3] in theedevelopm ment of desig gns. A sociall justice frammework provvides a founddation for deemocratic,participattory, effectiv ve, and sustaainable comm munity engaagement by aaccentuatingg an often-missing dimension d in n engineering g contexts: community c aagency. As ffaculty and sstudents try ttodevelop solutions s in programs su uch as Engin neers Withouut Borders, thhey should cconsider theprioritiess
the aim of this preliminary study into the integration of a molecular dynamicssimulation into a traditional tensile test lab. Students’ ability to use the presence or absence ofdislocations or the formation and motion of dislocations as the basis for explanations fordifference in macroscale and nanoscale sample stress-strain behavior varied, but was generallylimited and fragmented. Recommendations for better integration of the lab components focus ona reduction of concepts in the tensile test lab, increased analysis of simulation data for easiercomparison across samples, and re-sequencing of topics before and after this the tensile test lab.Bibliography1. Krause, S., Decker, J., Niska, J., & Alford, T., & Griffin, R. (2003
Paper ID #13887Are automated assessment tools helpful in programming courses?Mr. Raymond Scott Pettit, Abilene Christian University Raymond S. Pettit teaches courses in programming, artificial intelligence, objected oriented design, al- gorithms, theory of computation, and related subjects in ACU’s School of Information Technology and Computing. Prior to joining the ACU faculty, he spent twenty years in software development, research, and training the Air Force Research Lab and NASA’s Langley Research Center as well as private indus- try. His current research focuses on how automated assessment tools interact with student
(2013) this is still happening [3]. A reason why this continues to be an issue may be a gap in theliterature with the lack of papers describing best practices on recruiting and retaininginternational students [3]. Considering that, in 2013 Özturgut (2013) implemented a study to look Page 19.19.3into this issue and wrote an initial study on those best practices. The summary of the results arebelow: Best Practices in Recruiting International Students that emerged from Özturgut (2013)’s study on international student recruitment are: 1. Providing academic support and utilizing campus resources; 2. Attending and participating in
experimental de la capacitie portante du sable sous des foundations directes etablies en surface.” Annales des Travaux Publics de Belqique, Vol. 59, No. 3, pp5-58.4. Sutton, M. A., Orteu, J.-J., Schreier, H. W. (2009) Image Correlation for Shape, Motion and Deformation Measurements: Basic Concepts, Theory and Applications, Springer, New York.5. Hall, S. A., et al. (2010) “Discrete and continuum analysis of localized deformation in sand using x-ray μCT and volumetric digital image correlation.” Géotechnique, Vol. 60, No. 5, pp 315-322.6. Hall, S. A. (2012) “Full-field displacement/strain measurements and digital image correlation – principles and
could examine other ways to view studentvolunteerism and the potential effects that those experiences have on the attitudes of personaland professional social responsibility in engineering students.AcknowledgementsThis material is based on work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant#1158863. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation.Bibliography1 A. W. Astin, L. J. Vogelgesang, E. K. Ikeda and J. A. Yee, How Service Learning Affects Students, Los Angeles: Higher Education Research Institute, 2000.2 J. S. Eyler, D. E. Giles, C. M. Stenson and C. J. Gray, "At a Glace: What We
techniques.Further research into the existing data set could also lead to new insights. A strictly discursiveanalysis may reveal other common underlying interactions that could increase our understandingof change in conceptual understanding. 1. Streveler, R. A., Litzinger, T. A., Miller, R. L. and Steif, P. S. (2008), Learning Conceptual Knowledge in the Engineering Sciences: Overview and Future Research Directions. Journal of Engineering Education, 97: 279–294. 2. Chi, M. T. H., Feltovich, P. J. and Glaser, R. (1981), Categorization and Representation of Physics Problems by Experts and Novices. Cognitive Science, 5: 121–152. 3. Montfort, D., Brown, S. and Pollock, D. (2009), An Investigation of Students' Conceptual Understanding in
afirst-year course. We believe that the pedagogical process used in this course is transferable toother educational contexts.References: 1. Allen, D., Allenby, B., Bridges, M., Crittenden, J., Davidson, C., Hendrickson, C., Matthews, S., Murphy, C., and Pijawka, D. (2008), Benchmarking sustainable engineering education: Final report. EPA Grant X3-83235101-0. 2. Wiggins, J., McCormick, M., Bielefeldt, A., Swan, C., and Paterson, K. (2011), “Students and sustainability: Assessing students’ understanding of sustainability from service learning experiences”, paper presented at the 2011 Annual American Society of Engineering Educators (ASEE) Conference and Exposition, 26-29 June 2011, Vancouver, Canada
. Page 26.814.11AcknowledgementsThis study was supported by the INSPIRE Institute for Pre-College Engineering at PurdueUniversity.References[1] Cech, Erin A. 2013. "The Self-Expressive Edge of Occupational Sex Segregation." American Journal of Sociology 119(3):747-89[2] Ceci, S. J. & Williams, W.M. (2011). Understanding Current Causes of Women's Underrepresentation in Science.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108, doi:10.1073/pnas.1103900108 .[3] Meece, J. L., Glienke, B. B., & Burg, S. (2006). Gender and motivation. Journal of School Psychology, 44, 351−373[4] Auster, C. J., & Mansbach, C. S. (2012). The gender marketing of toys: An analysis of color and type of toy on the
Field Session, students are put into cohorts of 20 students, having 8 cohorts total. Each of the cohorts go through each of the Field Session sections a different order, once again due to space constraints. The curriculum has been designed so any student can go through any of the Field Session sections at any time, leading to ease of scheduling. Figure 4 below is an example of two cohorts schedules from Summer 2014. Students are given this schedule at an introduction meeting the first day or Field Session. Cohort M T W R F S M T W R F S S M T W R F
=300.[16] Culver, R.S., & Hackos, J.T. (1982). Perry's Model of Intellectual Development (Vol. 72). EngineeringEducation.[17] Belenky, M. F., Clinchy, B. M., Goldberger, N. R., and Tarule, J. M. (1986). Women's Ways of Knowing:The Development of Self, Voice and Mind. New York: Basic Books.[18] Baxter Magolda, M. B. (1992). Knowing and Reasoning in College: San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.[19] King, P. M., Kitchener, K. S. (1994). Developing Reflective Judgment: Understanding and PromotingIntellectual Growth and Critical Thinking in Adolescents and Adults: San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.[20] Kuhn, D. (1991). The Skills of Argument. England: Cambridge University Press
program, Leading Oneself. In defining“leader”, student responses shifted from simplistic definitions that viewed leaders asauthoritarian figures with the responsibility for command and controlling others to morecomplex definitions that view leaders as those who have a positive and authentic relationshipwith and responsibility to those s/he is leading. There is a shift from a focus on the leader to afocus on the relationship the leader has with others. In defining “leadership”, once again thestudent responses shift from simple to more complex definitions. They started with a focus onthe leader him or herself, and moved to an understanding of leadership as a process that must bemarked by positive interactions and relationships with others. These