Paper ID #42670Board 354: Project ELEVATE: Promoting Sustained & Equitable ChangeAmong Black, Latinx, and Indigenous Engineering FacultyDr. Alaine M Allen, Carnegie Mellon University Dr. Alaine M. Allen is an educator who intentionally works to uplift the voices of and create opportunities for individuals from groups historically marginalized in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) environments. She currently serves as the Associate Dean for Diversity, Equity and Inclusion at Carnegie Mellon University (CMU) in the College of Engineering, where she is committed to helping to build a culture of
relevant cases. More details about this research project are providedelsewhere 1.This was a broad project with many aspects. It built on prior work developing failure casestudies for incorporation into engineering courses, with specific application to civil engineering,engineering mechanics, architectural engineering, civil engineering technology, and constructionmanagement.Failure case studies may be used in engineering courses to address technical topics as well asnon-technical topics, such as management, ethics, and professionalism. The authors havedeveloped a number of failure case studies for classroom use. Studies have been carried out overseveral semesters in order to assess the use of failure case studies in civil engineering
Conference, Seattle, WA.6. Whiteacre, M.M. and Malave, C.O., 1998, "Integrated Freshman Engineering Curriculum for Pre-Calculus Students," Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference, Vol. 2, 820-823. Page 24.1258.97. Augustine, N.R., et al., Eds., “Rising Above the Gathering Storm,” National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering and Institute of Medicine, 2006.8. Kerr, A.D., and Pipes, R.B., 1987. “Why We Need Hands-On Engineering Education.” The Journal of Technology Review, Vol. 90, No. 7, p. 38.9. Sarasin, L., 1998, “Learning Style Perspectives: Impact in the Classroom.” Madison, WI: Atwood.10
process exercised within and beyond the classroom and a vitalprofessional skill. Engineers, in particular, must adjust to rapidly evolving technologies andpractices that require continuous learning and adaptation long after their initial formal trainingand transition into their professional careers.Education research emphasizes the need for engineering students to hone these lifelonglearning skills. Effective learning requires them to adopt self-regulated learning strategies tosynthesize and apply knowledge, and evaluate problems using engineering principles effectively(Zimmerman, 2000). However, students often default to ineffective learning strategies such asrereading, highlighting, repetition, and rote memorization (Blasiman et al., 2017
Education. He is a co-PI on the ”Engineering for Us All” (e4usa) project to develop a high school engineering course ”for all”. He is active in engineering within K-12, (Technology Student Association Board of Directors) and has written multiple texts in Engineering, Mathematics and Digital Electronics. He earned a PhD in Engineering Education from Purdue University, is a Senior Member of IEEE, on the Board of Governors of the IEEE Education Society, and a Member of Tau Beta Pi.Dr. Hossein EbrahimNejad, Drexel University Hossein EbrahimiNejad is a data scientist currently working with the office of Enrollment Analytics at Drexel University. He received his PhD in Engineering Education from Purdue University, where he
Paper ID #10681Scaffolding Cyber-Enabled Collaborative Learning in Engineering Coursesand Its Impacts of on Students’ LearningProf. Wei Zheng, Jackson State University Dr. Wei Zheng is an associate professor of Civil Engineering at Jackson State University. He received his Ph.D. in Civil Engineering from University of Wisconsin-Madison in 2001 and has over ten years of industrial experience. Since becoming a faculty member at JSU in 2005, he has made continuous efforts to integrate emerging technologies and cognitive skill development into engineering curriculum.Mr. Yanhua Cao, Jackson State University Yanhua Cao is a
-level. She has been collaborating and creating retention services and programs for thirteen years, currently serving as the Director of the IDEA Engineering Student Center at the University of California, San Diego. Dr. Duerr specializes in engineering student success, transfer student success, academic difficulty, as well as sense of belonging among commuter students. Within our technology saturated culture, Dr. Duerr seeks to create accessible, cutting-edge, student-centered programs and services in efforts to build students’ connection to the university, other students, and their goals.Dr. Saharnaz Baghdadchi, University of California, San Diego Saharnaz Baghdadchi is an Associate Teaching Professor at UC
Paper ID #38143Board 236: Children’s Identity Conception in Engineering Activities inthe Home EnvironmentMs. Sawsan Werfelli, State University of New York, Binghamton Sawsan Werfelli received her undergraduate degree in English from Tripoli University, Libya and her Master’s degree in Linguistics as a Fulbright scholar from Florida International University. She decided on pursuing her EdD after having worked in the field of education for 8 years. She is interested in social justice issues and inclusivity of education.Amber Simpson, State University of New York, Binghamton Amber Simpson is an Associate Professor of
up to eight semesters offinancial aid. As a result, our engineering degrees are designed as four-year curricula that startwith Calculus 1 and General Physics 1 in the fall of the first year.In 2013, we were awarded a National Science Foundation (NSF) Graduate 10K+ Science,Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Talent Expansion Program (STEP) grant to assistwith increasing the retention of at-risk engineering students (Jones et. al., 2014; Jones et. al.,2015). At the University of Portland, the majority of engineering students who fall into this at-risk category are those who start the first year in pre-calculus based on a Calculus 1 readinesstest that they complete during the summer before their first college semester. For engineering,our
and self-efficacy in the new generation of women STEM scholars", Women in engineering, science and technology: Education and career challenges, 97-114. 14. Grisselle Centeno, Susana Lai-Yuen, Iman Nekooeimehr, Audra Banaszak, Ashley Ishak, “The Impact of Healthcare-Related Pedagogical Interventions on Student Diversity, Motivation and Retention”, Proceedings of the 2016 Industrial and Systems Engineering Research Conference
Achievement in Engineering,” J. Educ. Psychol., vol. 107, no. 2, pp. 468–485.[21] C. Hill, C. Corbett, and A. St Rose. 2010. Why So Few? Women in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics.[22] G. Lichtenstein, H. L. Chen, K. A. Smith, and T. A. Maldonado. 2014. “Retention and persistence of women and minorities along the engineering pathway in the United States,” in Cambridge handbook of engineering education research, A. Johri and B. Olds, Eds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 311–334.[23] G. Arastoopour, N. C. Chesler, and D. W. Shaffer. 2014. “Epistemic persistence: A simulation-based approach to increasing participation of women in engineering,” J. Women Minor. Sci. Eng., vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 211–234.[24] M. J
Paper ID #15705Professional Development on Giving Feedback on Design for EngineeringStudents and EducatorsMr. Farshid Marbouti, Purdue University, West Lafayette Farshid Marbouti recently earned his Ph.D. in Engineering Education at Purdue University. His research interest is first-year engineering and specifically how to improve first-year engineering students’ success. He completed his M.A. in the Educational Technology and Learning Design at Simon Fraser University in Canada, and his B.S. and M.S. in computer engineering in Iran.Prof. Heidi A. Diefes-Dux, Purdue University, West Lafayette Heidi A. Diefes-Dux is a
, mathematics, and general STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics)interest and identity suggest that STEM interest and identity begin to develop as early aselementary school [3]–[10]. It is reasonable to believe that engineering-specific interest andidentity development are at work in early and middle childhood as well. However, few toolsexist to measure engineering identity and interest at the elementary school age.This project developed a survey instrument to measure engineering identity and interest inchildren in grades 3-6 (ages 8 to 12 years). The survey was refined over three phases and testedwith 492 students in grades 3-6 in diverse communities in two states in the United States. In allphases, we adapted existing validated
research programs as a means of attracting undergraduate studentsinto graduate education and research. Through research experiences for undergraduates (REU)programs, NSF supports U.S. citizens and permanent resident students from institutions that maynot have graduate programs in an area to immerse them into research environment at a hostresearch university. Therefore, REU programs are aimed to increase participants’ awareness andinterest in graduate school in computing, science, technology, engineering, and math (C-STEM)fields.However, the recent data showed the continuing lack of diversity in engineering graduateprograms [1]. From 2007 to 2017, there was a 5.1% increase in total graduate enrollment ofwomen in engineering, but Figure 1 shows that
Engineering Education at University of Nevada, Reno. His re- search focuses on the interactions between engineering cultures, student motivation, and their learning experiences. His projects involve the study of student perceptions, beliefs and attitudes towards becoming engineers, their problem solving processes, and cultural fit. His education includes a B.S. in Biomedical Engineering from Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology, a M.S. in Bioengineering and Ph.D. in Engineer- ing and Science Education from Clemson University.Dr. Allison Godwin, Purdue University at West Lafayette Allison Godwin, Ph.D. is an Assistant Professor of Engineering Education at Purdue University. Her research focuses what factors influence diverse
Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering and Institute of Medicine, 2006.8. Kerr, A.D., and Pipes, R.B., 1987. “Why We Need Hands-On Engineering Education.” The Journal of Technology Review, Vol. 90, No. 7, p. 38.9. Sarasin, L., 1998, “Learning Style Perspectives: Impact in the Classroom.” Madison, WI: Atwood.10. Gardner, H., 1999. “Intelligence Reframed: Multiple Intelligences for the 21st Century.” New York: Basic Books.11. Joyce, B., and Weil, M., 2000, “Models of Teaching.” Boston: Allyn and Bacon.12. Brandford, J.D., et al., Eds., “How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience and School,” Expanded Edition, National Academy of Sciences, 2000.13. Klingbeil, N. and Bourne, T., 2012, "The Wright State Model for
first-year engineering students. JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION-WASHINGTON-. 95: 39.9. Moskal BM, Leydens JA, Pavelich MJ (2002) Validity, reliability and the assessment of engineering education. JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION-WASHINGTON-. 91: 351-354.10. Messick S (1988) The once and future issues of validity: Assessing the meaning and consequences of measurement. Test validity. 33: 45.11. Pintrich P, Schunk DH (1996) Motivation in education: Theory, research, and practice. Chapter. 5: 153-197.12. Massachusetts Department of Education (2006) Massachusetts Science and Technology/Engineering Curriculum Framework. In: Education MDo, ed, Malden, MA.13. Bandura A (1986) The explanatory and predictive scope of self
prospective. This research Page 25.467.3discusses in detail the evolvement of Prairie View A&M energy engineering program, itsdeveloping history, and future plan for the ultimate success. Development of alternate (Nuclear)energy research infrastructure is one of the constituents of planned energy engineering program.The nuclear engineering program at PVAMU was initiated through the DOE Office of NuclearEnergy and Science and Technology Nuclear Engineering University Partnership program2. Theprogram involves three universities; Texas A&M University (TAMU), Texas A&M UniversityKingsville (TAMUK), Prairie View A&M University (PVAMU, a
:10.1089/cpb.2008.0204.[7] S. Daniels and M. Freeman, "Gifted dyslexics: MIND-strengths, visual thinking, andcreativity," in Twice Exceptional: Supporting and Educating Bright and Creative Students withLearning Difficulties., S. B. Kaufman, Ed. 2018, .[8] C. von Karolyi, "Visual-Spatial Strengths in Dyslexia: Rapid Discrimination of ImpossibleFigures," vol. 34, (4), pp. 380-391, 2001.[9] B. Crespi, "Pattern Unifies Autism," Front. Psychiatry, vol. 12, 2021.[10] L. Mottron, "Changing perceptions: The power of autism," vol. 479, (7371), pp. 33-35,2011.[11] N. W. Moon et al, Accommodating Students with Disabilities in Science, Technology,Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM): Findings from Research and Practice for MiddleGrades through University
advancing quantitative and fully integrated mixed methods.Dr. Kenneth Reid, University of Indianapolis Kenneth Reid is the Associate Dean and Director of Engineering at the R. B. Annis School of Engineering at the University of Indianapolis. He and his coauthors were awarded the Wickenden award (Journal of Engineering Education, 2014) and Best Paper award, Educational Research and Methods Division (ASEE, 2014). He was awarded an IEEE-USA Professional Achievement Award (2013) for designing the B.S. degree in Engineering Education. He is a co-PI on the ”Engineering for Us All” (e4usa) project to develop a high school engineering course ”for all”. He is active in engineering within K-12, (Technology Student Association
-layered selection andSBP frameworks.Conclusions and Future WorkThe recruitment process and SBP subsystems have significantly enhanced the likelihood of first-year retention and academic preparedness among low-income engineering scholars. Futureefforts will focus on tracking academic performance every semester, monitoring shifts inengineering majors, and evaluating career outcomes. Enhancements to mentoring frameworkswill address persistent barriers, such as financial literacy and mental health support. Long-termstudies will provide insights into the program’s sustained impact on scholar success.AcknowledgementThe National Science Foundation supported this work through the Scholarships in Science,Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (S-STEM
, Mass.), vol. 15, (2), pp. 209, 2017.[5] N. W. Moon et al, Accommodating Students with Disabilities in Science, Technology,Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM): Findings from Research and Practice for Middle Gradesthrough University Education. Atlanta, GA: SciTrain: Science and Math for All, 2012.[6] T. Armstrong, "Neurodiversity: The Future of Special Education?" vol. 74, (7), pp. 10-16,2017.[7] L. Clouder et al, "Neurodiversity in higher education: a narrative synthesis," High Educ, vol.80, (4), pp. 757-778, 2020. . DOI: 10.1007/s10734-020-00513-6.[8] M. Chrysochoou, A. E. Zaghi and C. M. Syharat, "Reframing Neurodiversity in EngineeringEducation," 2022. . DOI: 10.3389/feduc.2022.995865.[9] M. Chrysochoou et al, "Redesigning engineering
college. Thus, in the absence of improved college prep programs, colleges need tobridge the gap.For minority students who achieve high school graduation, community college is often the nextstep. Packard3 concluded that community colleges often provide an entry point for firstgeneration, low income, racial/ethnic minority or non-traditional college students. Increasing thenumbers of successfully graduating minority students in Science, Technology, Engineering andMath (STEM) is known to be achieved by intentional strategies to recruit students to and retainstudents at community colleges: emphasizing dual credit classes in high school, providingopportunity for career related experiences and providing community-related support4. Otherresearch showed
Frontiers of Engineering Education Symposium and the Purdue University 2018 recipient of School of Engineering Education Award for Excellence in Undergraduate Teaching and the 2018 College of Engineering Exceptional Early Career Teaching Award.Dr. Edward J. Berger, Purdue University at West Lafayette Edward Berger is an Associate Professor of Engineering Education and Mechanical Engineering at Purdue University, joining Purdue in August 2014. He has been teaching mechanics for over 20 years, and has worked extensively on the integration and assessment of specific technology interventions in mechanics classes. He was one of the co-leaders in 2013-2014 of the ASEE Virtual Community of Practice (VCP) for mechanics educators
joined the service. He was enlisted in the military and worked aroundplanes. When asked if she had any experience with engineering, she indicated “just with my dadwhen he was in the (branch of Service), that was about it.” When probed for what an engineerdoes she replied, “Basically create the electronics and the vehicles, and most of the technology we deal with everyday, and that we just don’t realize it.” Page 23.429.11 Kelly, high school studentAdditional results include improvement of the focus of college and professional participantstoward their high school
Science Board-Sponsored Workshop on “Moving Forward to Improve Engineering Education (Summary Notes)”, November 7, 2006, Georgia Institute of Technology.30. R. M. Ryan, and E. L. Deci. “Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation: Classic Definitions and New Directions,” Contemporary Educational Psychology, Vol. 25, pp. 54-67, 2000.31. J. Bransford et. al., How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School: Expanded Edition, National Academies Press, Washington, DC.32. A. E. Black and E. L. Deci, “The effects of instructors’ autonomy support and students’ autonomous motivation on learning organic chemistry: A self-determination theory perspective,” Science Education, 84, 740-756, 2000.33. G. C. Williams, and E. L. Deci, “Internalization of
, especially for historically marginalized and minoritized students [1], [2]. Ong et al statethat as the demographics of the United States continue to shift, educational institutions have boththe obligation and motivation to develop learning environments that benefit students of allbackgrounds [3]. The classroom experience is a pivotal piece of a student’s collegiateexperience, and research has demonstrated the positive impacts of prioritizing and improvinginclusivity in the classroom to improve student experiences and belonging [1], [2], [4], [5]. Thisis especially important in the context of the Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math(STEM) classrooms, and more specifically engineering classrooms, because historically, the lackof diversity in
conversational platform to evaluate and teach manufacturing skills to the future workforce, and solving geometric puzzles to design sustainable and resilient products as a 3D composition of pieces.Shreyes N Melkote, Georgia Institute of Technology ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 An NSF FMRG Supported exploratory Study of Prompting Large Language Models for a Conversational Manufacturing Education PlatformIntroduction and BackgroundManufacturing education is a foundation for technological and economic progress, providingindividuals with the expertise and skills essential for fostering innovation and productivity. Whilefundamental knowledge of manufacturing processes, materials, and machinery
Professionals in Science and Technology, Professional women and minorities: A total human resource data compendium. Washington D.C.: SPST, 2006.[2] L. J. Sax, M. A. Kanny, T. A. Riggers-Piehl, H. Whang, and L. N. Paulson, “‘But I’m Not Good at Math’: The Changing Salience of Mathematical Self-Concept in Shaping Women’s and Men’s STEM Aspirations,” Res. High. Educ., vol. 56, no. 8, pp. 813–842, Dec. 2015.[3] B. L. Yoder, “Engineering by the Numbers.” [Online]. Available: https://www.asee.org/papers-and- publications/publications/college-profiles/15EngineeringbytheNumbersPart1.pdf.[4] M. Orr, N. Ramirez, and M. Ohland, “Socioeconomic Trends in Engineering: Enrollment, Persistence, and Academic Achievement” in Proc., ASEE Annual
spaces) [10], [11]. Forstudents, such a perspective can guide them to draw connections between their personalexperiences with AI technologies, their communities, and potential impacts on the larger societyof which they are a part. Informed by research in engineering ethics education that much of the ethics instructionwould run the risk of being only superficially effective if it does not address three categories oflearning objectives: emotional engagement (want to make ethical decisions), intellectualengagement (know how to make ethical decisions), and particular knowledge (be aware of thecurrently accepted guidelines for ethical practice) [12], [13], we curated a suite of ethicsactivities that expose students to various aspects of AI