the futureengineering workforce by supporting the recruitment and persistence of Black, Indigenous andPeople of Color (BIPOC) and female students in engineering. Despite significant investmentsby government agencies, universities, foundations and industries that rely on the skills andtalents of engineers, BIPOC and women are underrepresented in the engineering workforce.Engineering depends on team collaboration, and research shows that diverse groups aretypically more effective than homogeneous teams when complex problem solving are criticalgoals [1]. The United States must educate a diverse engineering workforce to address thecomplex technological challenges faced by our society. Greater diversity in the STEMworkforce will result in a new
further valued and supported by university administrators.IntroductionThere is a persistent concern surrounding representing diverse groups in science, technology,engineering, and mathematics (STEM) in the United States [1]. Additionally, ABET’saccreditation is aimed at producing graduates who are prepared to enter the global workforcewith the ability to succeed and thrive in diverse and inclusive environments [2]. STEMprofessions require imagination and innovation which is easier to achieve when persons withdiverse backgrounds and experiences collaborate and work toward a common goal. Theseunderrepresented minority students face special challenges in these fields [3]. These challengesrequire an asset-based, cultural capital approach to analyze
network connecting the participating schools.IntroductionInitially established in 1987, the REU program expands access to research opportunities forstudents from minority groups and non-research-focused tertiary institutions [1]. The NationalScience Foundation (NSF) launched the Research Experience for Undergraduates (REU)program to support this. This program has been proven to support undergraduates to pursueThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under GrantNo. 1849454.graduate study in science, technology, engineering, or mathematics (STEM) [2-4]. This researchprogram has also improved students' ability to work through the uncertainty in researchproblems, sharpening their leadership skills, gaining a more
work aims to explore Black engineering students’ experiences using acommunity-based participatory research (CBPR) strategy called photovoice, which is commonlypracticed in public health. Photovoice is a qualitative research approach that involves the collectionand analysis of data through the lens of each participant. To date, few scholars have applied thisnarrative approach to understanding Black students’ experiences in the context of engineeringeducation and practice.This study explored how the current racial climate in the United States impacts the experiences ofBlack undergraduate engineering students. The outcome of the photovoice experience was two-fold: 1) To capture each participant’s lived experience, leveraging each photo as a
. R. Jamaal Downey and Idalis Villanueva Alarcón,Introduction The hidden curriculum (HC) has been traditionally viewed as the unwritten, unofficial,and often unintended messages (e.g., assumptions, lessons, values, beliefs, attitudes, andperspectives) that are not openly acknowledged in each environment [1] [2]. More specificallyrelated to engineering/education, HC is hidden under the veil of norms, professionalism, andstandards which prioritizes the current status quo of dominant identities in engineering (e.g.,white, male, meritocratic) [1]. The presence of hidden curriculum (HC) in our educational institutions is unquestioned.Hidden curriculum can be perceived as both helpful or hurtful depending on the messages
the data collection informedcritical design decisions at the end of the paper.IntroductionThe transition from high school to university involves significant adjustments, including theacculturation to a new academic environment, sometimes even a change in the language ofinstruction, and social expectations and norms. This transition period is known to define thecritical decisions students may make in subsequent years. Findings from a study led by Katanis[1] found that the expectations students set for their first-year experiences were either partiallyor not met. Students encountered a much heavier workload than expected, in addition to findinguniversity studies uninteresting. In terms of academic progress, more than half of therespondents were
positive psychological and socialoutcomes 1 . Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL), grounded in the SocialConstructivism Theory, leverages technologies to facilitate and encourage interactions amongstudents across domains 2 . Although CSCL has been incorporated into education by variousstudies 3,4,5,6 , teachers and policymakers may lack understanding of how group collaboration canbe effectively integrated into instructional strategies 7 . The use of CSCL technologies,pedagogies, and curricula by both teachers and students requires further investigation.Past CS education research has attempted to detect individual-level problem-solving behaviors toassist struggling students, including identifying error-fixing patterns 8 and latent
, Indiana. She earned her BS, MS and PhD in Industrial Engineering from The Univers ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Identification of Student Outcomes for the Electric Propulsion Aircraft Industry Based on Industry-developed Consensus StandardsIntroduction Electric-drive cars are becoming more common on the roads, so it is imaginable toforesee a time when electric propulsion aircraft and air mobility vehicles are in the airspace.With over 200 electric aircraft in development in 2023, the market size for electric propulsionaircraft is expected to exceed $25 billion by 2030 [1]. With regulations and internationalconsensus driving the
graduate education, faculty hiring, and the pathway to an academic career. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Lessons Learned: Faculty Search Committees’ Attitudes Towards and Against Rubrics Gabriella Coloyan Fleming, Maura BorregoIntroduction Faculty search committees are the gatekeepers to the next generation of tenure-trackfaculty [1]. The tenure-track faculty search process typically follows similar steps: 1)development and marketing of the position, 2) narrowing the candidate pool from all applicantsto a “long list” for first-round interview (often, on the phone or a video call), 3) conducting first-round interviews, 4
this approach or whatits impact might be on the engineering leadership development of college students.The primary purpose of the practice paper is to present a short-term activity that models anidentity-based approach (reflexive instruction) to engineering leadership instruction. By using amodular format that can be easily scaled, this research presents instructional activities that can beapplied easily in a wide spectrum of courses, from introductory engineering to senior capstoneclasses. The lessons take 1-2 class periods; they are based on easily accessible resources; andthey require minimal preparation by instructors. Activities include an introduction into severalleadership styles, a teamwork activity, class discussion, and two essays.In
decision-making. Overall, the literature review has uncovered several research gaps that the engineeringeducation should begin addressing.Conceptual Framework The conceptual framework for the larger study is based on Eccles’ Situated Expectancy-Value Theory (SEVT), a motivation theory that focuses on understanding student achievement-related choices through expectancy and subjective task values (Eccles, 1983; Eccles & Wigfield,2020; M. Te Wang & Eccles, 2013; Wigfield & Eccles, 2000). We employed the socializerperspective with which Eccles and colleagues argued that student expectancy and subjective taskvalues are influenced by their surroundings, including the instructors and learning environments(Eccles, 2007). Figure 1 shows
and community and the importance of equitable and inclusive practices,policies, and procedures. This paper describes the planning of the student day, lessons learned,and assessment of the student day.INTRODUCTION A diverse university community opens all students up to a broader range of perspectives,enable them to be global thinkers and actors, to respect diverse values, and to attain acompetitive edge as well-rounded and creative leaders in their fields [1]. Diversity, Equity, andInclusion (DEI) has long been an important part of personal, professional, and curriculardevelopment for university faculty, yet students continue to voice a desire for improvedengagement with concepts of race, racism, bias, cultural awareness and social justice
regard, Vargas et al. reported the retention ratesfrom Texas Public University (Table 1), which demonstrate that schools with a large number ofminority students have a lower retention rate [28], [29]. Table 1. Texas Public Universities Freshman Retention Rates. Freshman entering in Fall 2015 through Fall 2018 [28], [29]. Average Freshman Texas Public University Retention Rate UT Austin 95% Texas A&M University 92
evaluation in the future.Tags: Postdoctoral Development, Future Faculty Development Program, Program Evaluation,Underrepresented IdentitiesBackground Postdoctoral (postdoc) appointments are meant to be temporary opportunities for thesescholars to develop important skills and enhance their research while still under the guidance ofanother scholar in their field. These appointments often appeal to PhD earners interested inpursuing a tenure-track faculty position, but feel they need additional development in a neededskill or to build on their research portfolio [1]. When considering that postdoc appointmentstructures and expectations can vary wildly depending on discipline, location, and funding, andthe number of postdocs at any given
nationa ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Evaluation of a Work-Integrated Learning Program for Undergraduate STEM Outreach InstructorsThis paper describes and evaluates a comprehensive work-integrated learning program,developed and delivered by Actua, a Canadian National STEM organization. The programprovides instructors with a variety of opportunities to improve their skills, career readiness, andtheir employer connections and networks. The program consisted of four sets of activities: (1) Aset of skills-focused training modules to prepare participants for their more immediate STEMoutreach work and longer-term work readiness; (2) Industry-Led Activities andMicro
therecruitment of undergraduate women and underrepresented minorities into computer science and mathematics.AbstractIn 2018 women, Black and Hispanic students accounted for 19.9, 9 and 11%, respectively, ofundergraduate degrees in computer science (CS). Black students were awarded 5% of degrees inmath and Hispanic students 11% [1]. This project studied the impact of an Emerging ScholarsProgram, a Peer-Led Team Learning program with the goal of recruiting women andunderrepresented minorities into math and CS. A collaboration between the Mathematics and CSDepartments was established in 2013 at the University of Pennsylvania. Freshman andsophomores with undeclared majors were actively recruited. Workshops led by peer leaders andconducted
young learners to engineering as a profession and broaden theirviews of opportunities in this field. The recruitment methods used for these camps show thatnomination-based recruitment methods have the potential for greater impact on changingstudents’ engineering trajectories.Introduction Many universities offer K-12 engineering outreach programs such as summer camps [1],afterschool clubs [2], in-class activities [3], printed brochures [4], and single-day on-campusvisits [5] as ways to increase students’ awareness of and interest in engineering. While many ofthese are short-term programs, longer-term outreach programs have been recommended, asstudents with sustained engineering exposure report greater long-term interest in
be leveraged inengineering education research and provide a step-by-step method for social media analytics.People around the world use social media platforms (e.g., Facebook, Reddit, SnapChat, TikTok,and Twitter) to share content that express their personal and professional identities and connectwith others like them [1]–[4]. Social media is a public space full of rich information andconversations that can show how and who people interact with and what people publicly shareabout themselves. Particularly, social media has served as a platform for marginalizedcommunities to connect, organize and collaborate, disseminate information, and negotiate theiridentities [5]–[11]. Social media is a rich and vast source of information that
. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023Examining an Equity-focused Collective Impact Project through the Lens of Alliance Members’ Prior Experiences Rebecca Zarch1 and Monica M. McGill2 1 SageFox Consulting Group 2 CSEdResearch.org 1 rzarch@sagefoxgroup.com, 2 monica@csedresearch.org Abstract Research Problem: A Collective Impact (CI) model provides a foundation for bringing together independent organizations, networks, and societies in a structured way to achieve large-scale
recommendations for enhancing thementors’ effectiveness. Overall, the results indicate that the mentors positively supported studentlearning and enhanced their success in their first-year design course.Review of LiteratureStudy Framework: Supporting Student Development. We framed our research by embracingChickering and Reisser's [1] seven-vector student development model. The model aligns wellwith our focus on students working in teams, developing a sense of belonging, increasing theirconfidence for learning, and gaining a professional identity. The seven vectors are developingprofessional relationships, enhancing personal competence, monitoring emotions, gaining apersonal identity, internalizing a sense of purpose, realizing personal interdependence
engagement among learners.IntroductionIn recent years, technological advancements have significantly impacted how we learn, withmany K-12 education programs incorporating a hands-on, constructivist approach to teachingand learning [1]–[3]. However, as students transition to undergraduate programs, there isoften a lack of continuity in the teaching methods used, leading to challenges inunderstanding and applying the lessons taught, aside from continuing in the discipline.Therefore, there is a need to seek out a teaching methodology that can stimulate themotivation of learners and further learners’ zeal in the chosen field.Experiment-centric pedagogy (ECP) is a hands-on learner-centered teaching technique thatemploys inexpensive, portable instruments
library, innovating classroom teachingmethods and practice teaching mode, which provides a case of engineering educationfor sustainable development for the engineering education community. Figure 1 The vision and actions of engineering education for sustainable development of ECUSTI. Educational Vision ECUST has proposed the core qualities of engineering education for sustainabledevelopment in three dimensions: knowledge, skills and attitude. A new concept ofgreen engineering education has also been put forward. It integrates the 12 principlesof green engineering into the talent training link of engineering education to cultivatesystematic thinking of students of consciously following the principles
Your Hand, a multidisciplinary collaboration between engineering and the artsAbstract: Raise Your Hand is an immersive, interactive sensor-driven dynamic art exhibit.Vision tracking software changes the video projections, mechatronics, and music composition inresponse to the height of a visitor’s raised arm. The 1 ½-year project brought together studentsand faculty from computer engineering, computer science, electrical engineering, industrialdesign, mechanical engineering, literature, media and communication, computational media, andmusic technology. Further, students were integrated into the project in different forms, includingcapstone design teams, Vertically Integrated Project (VIP) students, undergraduate research
qualitative, ethnographic, partic- ipatory, and action-oriented research methods to examine and improve equity in engineering education contexts. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Intersectionality, Identity Dilemmas, and Cultural Homelessness: A Discourse Analysis of the Experiences of a Female Undergraduate International and Transracial Adoptee in Engineering (Research)1. IntroductionA home is a place where we experience a sense of safety and belonging. We may think of a home as aphysical structure, but we can also recognize the importance of people in creating that sense of safety andbelonging. In this paper, we tie the sense of having a cultural home to the
relationship among belongingness, self-efficacy and perceivedlearning and yet distinctness of these learning outcome metrics. In addition, the perceivedaccessibility is confirmed to be uniquely useful for understanding the needs of SWD, and thusdeserves more attention to help them succeed.IntroductionThe accessibility of course content plays a critical role in student success. Students withdisabilities (SWD) face extra challenges when digital content is inaccessible or difficult to use.This is a significant challenge for many students that instructors are often unaware of; nationalstatistics by the NSF and NCES report [1] 19% of the 4-year undergraduate population have adisability, but according to a Wisconsin research study [2] the majority (75%) of
-influenced, and factors considered to be influenced by bothstudent and institution. Smith and Van Aken’s conceptual model was based on a review ofprevious research on engineering transfer student persistence which included a few studieslimited to ET majors. In our study, persistence is designated as baccalaureate ET degreecompletion. The variables included in the study were informed by a review of the literature onengineering transfer student persistence- see Figure 1.Methods In this study, we examined the influence of student characteristics, academic factors, andinstitutional factors on the academic performance and persistence of ET transfer students whotransferred from two-year institutions to four-year institutions in North Carolina from
have observed that incoming first-yearstudents often struggle with teamwork, and several instructors from the program attended aworkshop in Summer 2022 led by Worcester Polytechnic Institute (WPI) with lengthy experienceleading project-based learning first-year engineering courses. The facilitators of this workshopprovided activities that can be integrated into existing or new courses to help foster equitableteaming practices in a project based learning setting. These tools had previously beenimplemented in a program at WPI and are available in Pfeifer and Stoddard, 2020 [1]; this paperexplores implementations and impact of integrating these equitable teaming tools at a largerscale.The instructors of the first-year engineering course who
verbal and written communication. The goal being toincrease teaching and learning effectiveness. Instructors are obligated to share knowledge, information, and skill sets with their students.However, many instructors are unaware of their students' preferred communication styles.Furthermore, even across different sections of the same course, each individual class canhave a completely different communication style. Many people are even unsure of their owncommunication style. As a result, each course should be adapted to meet the needs of eachdifferent group of students each semester the course is taught. According to the literature,engineering students are hands-on, active, and visual learners [1]-[4]. Comparisons of thestudent's self-assessment
fine-grained,as overall sentiment scores may not capture teaching-related qualities and do not differentiatebetween fine-grained teaching qualities such as helpfulness and clarity.LEEQ can be used by the research community to allow for full analyses of teaching evaluations,rather than focusing solely on quantitative metrics; in this paper, we perform a case study thathighlights one such analysis. Prior work has found that course evaluations can easily be biasedagainst certain identity groups; for example, female instructors and instructors of color tend to berated lower or more harshly compared to white male instructors [1, 2]. The switch fromtraditional in-person learning to hybrid or remote learning during the COVID-19 pandemic alsolikely
to deliver lectures and supplement instruction has been onan upswing for a number of years. This trend showed a tremendous growth over the pandemic asexpected with the transition to some variation of online delivery whether it was remote teachingor via the development of high quality online courses. A dominant mechanism for lecturedelivery in engineering disciplines at a large university in the southwest has been the use ofvideo. A short survey of faculty identified 3 dominant strains in video production (1) Videocontent captured using Zoom (2) Video content captured in professional studio settings and (3)Video content captured in classrooms using existing lecture capture technologies built in class.The second strain of video creation has