Institutional Research Office was also asked to provide a seminar and workshopfor the CET Department on how to integrate Program Outcomes with curriculum learning Page 22.1690.16outcomes.5. Project OutcomesThe success of the comprehensive project will be measured by students’ ability to do thefollowing: A mastery of the hands-on knowledge, techniques, and skills in design project An ability to apply concurrent engineering concepts in product design applications Technical expertise in selecting electrical/electronic components, and materials in building and implement processes An ability to analyze, design, and implement hardware and software
NEW GENERAL ENGINEERING PROGRAM WITH ALTERNATIVE ENERGY AND POWER GENERATION TRACK AT PENN STATE Faculty Paper Sustainable Energy in the Curriculum Kenneth Edward Dudeck & Wieslaw Grebski Penn State Hazleton ked2@psu.edu AbstractThere is an emerging need for multidisciplinary quality engineers with broad range skills capableto design, develop, and integrate new technologies applied to the Alternative and RenewableEnergy Technology industry.The Penn State Hazleton Campus has developed a new innovative Bachelor of Science inGeneral
AC 2011-2669: FOSTERING SYSTEMS ENGINEERING EDUCATION THROUGHINTERDISCIPLINARY PROGRAMS AND GRADUATE CAPSTONE PROJECTSDavid R Jacques, Air Force Institute of Technology Associate Professor and Chair, Systems Engineering Programs at the Air Force Institute of Technology.John M Colombi, Air Force Institute of Technology John Colombi, Ph.D. is an Assistant Professor of Systems Engineering, Faculty Scholar-in-Residence for the Air Force Center for Systems Engineering and Chair of the Operational Technology Program at the Air Force Institute of Technology. He teaches and leads sponsored research in systems engineering, human systems integration, architectural analysis and enterprise/ software services. Retiring after 21
emotional domains6. Recent review andrecommendations include the practice of engineering in an authentic context7. If structuredproperly, authentic projects as a context for learning engineering potentially meets many of thehuman goals within the Ford and Nichols Taxonomy of Human Goals: Integrative socialrelationship goals, self-assertive social relationship goals, affective goals, cognitive goals, taskgoals, and subjective organizational goals 8. The result can be synergistic improvements inmotivation for learning 9.Engagement is often cited as an important component of learning in PBL. In the Civil andChemical Engineering school at RMIT, researchers10 examined the factors that effectengagement in a PBL environment. They examined first year
effectively transfer subject informationto the engineering students. A number of methods have been developed for enhancing studentlearning including multimedia developments,1,2 active, problem-based learning,3 collaborativelearning,4,5 and participation in cooperative education.6 Several papers have specificallyaddressed methods for improving or supplementing the teaching of engineering including the useof spreadsheets to solve two-dimensional heat transfer problems,7 the use of a transport approachin teaching turbulent thermal convection,8 the use of computers to evaluate view factors inthermal radiation,9 implementation of a computational method for teaching free convection,10and the use of an integrated experimental/analytical/numerical approach
Page 22.240.7 learning competence of Mathematics for freshmen of the Comp. Science degree. Education Engineering (EDUCON) 2010. April 14-16: Madrid, Spain.Corcoran, B. and J. Whelan. (2008). A project based approach to learning for first year engineering students. ISEE-08 - International Symposium for Engineering Education. September 8-10: Dublin, Ireland.Courter, S.S.; Johnson, G. (2007). Building community and retention among first-year students: engineering First-Year Interest Groups (eFIGSs). ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference. October 10-13: Milwaukee, WI.Cox, M.F.; Diefes-Dux, H.; Julim Lee (2007). Development and Assessment of an Undergraduate Curriculum for First-Year International
students are still out.Nevertheless, the Co-op students who did construct portfolios found the experience to bevaluable. They did not feel comfortable with providing the experiential learning advisor with theentire portfolio but said that they had leveraged the portfolio to integrate other experiences inschool and work. Although the portfolio was offered as an option instead of the report, somestudents did the report anyway and included it as an artifact in the portfolio. Informalconversations with students indicate that they felt ownership of their portfolios in ways notassociated with formal report.FindingsThe title of our paper begins with a quotation from a pilot Co-op informant who said thatcreating a portfolio helped her see the value of her
Education. 90(3): 363- 374. 3. Jensen, D., D. Rhymer, et al. (2002). "A rocky journey toward effective assessment of visualization modules for learning enhancement in Engineering Mechanics." Educational Technology & Society. 5(3): 150-162. 4. Linsey, J., Talley, A., et al., (2009) “From Tootsie Rolls to Broken Bones: An Innovative Approach for Active Learning in Mechanics of Materials”, Advances in Engineering Education Journal, Vol. 1, Number3, Winter. 5. Raucent, B. (2001). "Introducing problem-based learning in a machine design curriculum: result of an experiment." Journal of Engineering Design 12(4): 293-308. 6. Mills, J. and D. Treagust (2003). "Engineering Education: Is Problem-Based or Project- Based Learning the Answer?" Australasian
an online survey instrument that was electronically distributed to employersstatewide. The information, which was collected over the Summer of 2009, demonstrated anunmet need by industry in the state for graduates with the ability to apply computer andengineering skills to business5 and are discussed further in the Results Section of this paper.In the December of 2009, a second workshop with community college computer and informationtechnology faculty was held during the Third Annual CCCDC to report back on progress of theICET degree and to continue to receive input and feedback on the curriculum. In January 2010,an articulation meeting was held to evaluate each community college's courses and learningoutcomes and to map them to the ISU ICET
the established disciplines”, International Journal for Sustainability in Higher Education, 5(3), 239-250.Azapagic, A., Perdan, S., and Shallcross, D. (2005), “How much do engineering students know about sustainable development? The findings of an international survey and possible implications for the engineering curriculum”, European Journal of Engineering Education, 30(1), 1-19.Dewoolkar, M. M., George, L. A., Hayden, N. J., and Neumann, M. (2009a), “Hands-on undergraduate geotechnical engineering modules in the context of effective learning pedagogies, ABET outcomes, and curricular reform”, J. of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 135(4), 161-175.Dewoolkar, M. M., George, L. A
] [8]. Hmelo-Silver and Pfeffer [8] found that novicestended to focus more on static components of a system, while experts applied an integratedapproach of structures, behaviors, and functions to solving a problem. Consequently, it is criticalto have a teaching and learning environment that enhances students’ ability to solve complex,real-world problems in engineering.The disconnections between industry practice and classroom curriculum calls for changes inengineering education from isolated and specialized programs to integral collaborative programswith input from multiple disciplines. One of the potential improvements to the traditionalsubject-based teaching-learning is to introduce problem based teaching –learning [9]. Using real-world
discussion or chooses to present a topic to them or challenges them to find materials to match the subject under discussion.Change F Change management is a decision relating to how the professors allocatemanagement their time to curriculum change, whether they do it as a regulated on- going activity or in bursts of intense effort.Data Management F Data relative to the course must be managed and handled. Most[Data professors see this as an independent function and delegate it to aManagement] separate system, such as a learning management
in learning Page 22.694.3across disciplines. Beasley et al [10] considered detailed processes for curriculum design. Theylisted several integrative experiences that would bring together diverse parts of the curriculum inan engineering department. Carlson et al [11] viewed Design-Build-Test project cycles as anexcellent means of cross-disciplinary innovation and knowledge transfer. Kleppe [12] describes amultidisciplinary capstone design course for high school teachers, bringing together variousaspects of innovation and entrepreneurship. Kostoff [13] looked at developing processes forenhancing innovation, by transferring information and
decision support systems for managing andsaving the environment7. Hence, for the students to be aware and knowledgeable and be ableto apply their learning in real situations, Missouri S&T scientists and engineers havedeveloped an environmental web-based learning module to complement the GIS learningtool.This evaluation is one part of a large scale National Science Foundation funded project that Page 22.123.6has been carried out over the last several years, in which a web-based e-learning system isbeing developed to facilitate integration of GIS into the Civil Engineering curriculum. Thesystem consists of a number of discipline specific modules
assignments with the capstonedesign project, the progress of some projects can be slowed because of the pace of instruction. Ifassignments related to the design process instruction are not integrated with the stages of thecapstone project (i.e. are ad hoc assignments just to teach the principles/tools), then the studentsare burdened with doing the work twice—once for the ad hoc assignment and once for theproject. Again, this latter approach cannot assure that the project and instruction arecoordinated.The difficulty of teaching the design process simultaneously with the initiation of capstoneprojects was part of the impetus for our department to implement a change in curriculum thatamounts to a three semester capstone design experience. While three
skills are formallyassessed, universities will not fully understand the consequences of their curriculum.This student poster presentation will present the results of a study on the impact of provingpublic speaking opportunities in the engineering curriculum. The presentation will summarizethe roadblocks to improving student skills and possible solutions to these roadblocks.Key Words – public speaking, communication skills, leadership, teamwork, engineeringeducation.There is a NeedCurrent ABET accreditation requirements emphasize the importance of ―soft‖ skills in planningand achieving excellence in engineering education. Criterion 3 under Program Outcomes states:―Engineering programs must demonstrate that their students attain (g) an ability to
will not only bring the efforts of faculty working together, encourage and motivate current engineering students to work for a great cause, but will also attract students from a variety of backgrounds and interests to the field of engineering. This semester the students have progressed in the area of mechanical design and development of assistive technologies beyond our expectations. It is readily apparent that a hands-on and directed design theory and application multidisciplinary cross-course integration will be an inspiration for the students, faculty, collaborators, as well as for the end users. Acknowledgements The author would like to thank our collaborators from St. Joseph Outpatient Rehabilitation Center
Engineering Management Program engage others through effective oral,technical and written communication evidenced by:• active listening• clarity and conciseness in presentation• an ability to adjust content and presentation style to audience• confidence and discernment in asking appropriate questions to obtain information vital to the project or task at hand.Professional Behavior: Graduates of the Engineering Management Program will continually grow in theirawareness and understanding of the societal, ethical, cultural, legal and political issues prevalent in an increasinglyglobal society.Integration: Drawing on proficiencies in the areas described above, Graduates of the Engineering ManagementProgram are able to integrate
this curriculum development task as the facultyencountered many questions in the process. Each workday was led by the Faculty DevelopmentProgram director, his graduate assistant, several undergraduate STEM majors, and severalfaculty who themselves been through the program and implemented CBI. Faculty worked ingroups often across STEM disciplines providing valuable feedback to one another particularlyabout the lack of clarity of presented concepts that experts often miss. A template, shown inFigure 1, was developed that provided faculty with an outline of the framework of backwardsdesign, the method presented as a structure for the development of effective CBI content. Thetemplate which focuses on learning objectives and assessment was
gives adescription of each category. The curriculum team ensures that the syllabus covers concepts fromall the major engineering disciplines. The list of lesson plans for Fall 2010 is given in Table 2.When developing lesson plans, we take full advantage of the fairly comprehensive collections ofengineering lesson plans that already exist including but not limited to: teachengineering.org,howtosmile.org, make magazine, Instructables.com, etc. As we gain experience in designinglesson plans we hope to eventually make our own contributions to these communities. Page 22.302.5 Module- These lesson plans teach an overarching engineering
Squires, Stevens Institute of Technology Alice Squires has nearly 30 years of professional experience and is an industry and research professor in Systems Engineering at Stevens Institute of Technology in the School of Systems and Enterprises. She is a Primary Researcher for the Body of Knowledge and Curriculum to Advance Systems Engineering (BKCASE) and Systems Engineering Experience Accelerator projects. She has served as a Senior Sys- tems Engineer consultant to Lockheed Martin, IBM, and EDO Ceramics, for Advanced Systems Support- ability Engineering Technology and Tools (ASSETT), Inc. Alice previously served as a senior engineering manager for General Dynamics (GD), Lockheed Martin (LM) and as a technical lead for
tackle the diverse issues confronting us.Statistically, students who matriculate to an engineering undergraduate program from aneconomically disadvantaged background are substantially less likely to graduate than otherstudents. Locally, an integral part of the land grant mission of Michigan State University hashistorically be to serving the needs of all segments of the Michigan population. For these twokey reasons - one rooted in current need and one rooted in historic mission - we have operated asummer bridge experience for students from economically disadvantaged, inner city areas ofDetroit over the last several years. Our summer bridge program has been supported with fundingfrom corporate sources and from the NSF-funded Michigan Louis Stokes
says nothing of theneed for skill in using fabrication processes to make a prototype. Both an understanding of fitsand exposure to manufacturing processes may not be covered until after CAD instruction in atechnology program.Off-the-shelf instructional materials typically do not place a high emphasis on integrating DFMand DFA considerations into CAD modeling. It is typically open ended projects that provide thebest format for encouraging students to integrate manufacturing considerations into theirmodeling as part of generating a physical prototype. For this purpose, CAD instruction may becombined with some exposure to CAM and CNC programming that allows students to by-passmanual fabrication. However, this leads to a very heavy course content
in 1995. In 2003 Professor Bowman’s name was added to the Purdue Book of Great Teachers. In 2007 he received the Purdue College of Engineering Mentoring Award and he became a Professor of Engineering Education (by courtesy). His research in engineering education is focussed on development of materials that encourage interest and retention of students in engineering fields, approaches for assessment of student learning and the role of diversity and diverse perspectives in engineering education.Brenda Capobianco, Purdue University Dr. Brenda Capobianco is an Associate Professor in the Department of Curriculum and Instruction and holds a courtesy appointment in the School of Engineering Education and an affiliated
under NYU-Poly’s GK-12 program funded by NSF and CBRI consortium of donors. His research interests include real-time monitoring DNA-protein interactions at electrified interfaces.Vikram Kapila, Polytechnic Institute of New York University VIKRAM KAPILA is an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Polytechnic Institute of NYU, Brooklyn, NY, where he directs an NSF funded Web-Enabled Mechatronics and Process Control Re- mote Laboratory, an NSF funded Research Experience for Teachers Site in Mechatronics, and an NSF funded GK-12 Fellows project. He has held visiting positions with the Air Force Research Laboratories in Dayton, OH. His research interests are in cooperative control; distributed spacecraft formation
simulators to teach Computer Engineering concepts to students. Somesimulators feature visual representation of the hardware to better convey the systems beingstudied. Examples of this include WebMIPS[7], RaVi[8] and MipsIt[9]. Other simulators such asMARS[10], SPIM[11] and TExaS[5] provide an integrated development environment and debuggingfeatures for students to develop programs for the target hardware. These systems have much lessemphasis on the inner working of the processor. Hades[12] is a Java-based logic simulator withan extensive library of logic components and a powerful visualization of the circuit simulation.Lastly, LC-3[13] is an Instruction Set Architecture (ISA) with an assembler and simulator suitethat students may use in learning
member from 2007 to 2010. He has served on the IEEE Education Society Adcom and has been the IEEE Com- puter Society representative to the Frontiers in Education Conference Steering Committee. He served as FIE Co-Program Chair in 1995 and 1998. Soldan served as President of the Electrical and Computer En- gineering Department Heads Association in 2002-03. He chaired the Computer Engineering Curriculum Committee of the Joint IEEE Computer Society/ACM Computing Curriculum Taskforce that published the first model curriculum for computer engineering in 2005. The Computer Society recognized this with an Outstanding Contribution Award. Dr. Soldan is a Fellow of IEEE and a member of Eta Kappa Nu, Sigma Tau, Phi Kappa Phi
of a University Student Interdisciplinary Research Grant for$10,000. The project, initially referred to as the “Solar Laptop Project,” was an attempt toinvolve many faculty and students from different departments while incorporating as many of theABET defined a-k student outcomes as possible. Eleven members of the faculty/staff andseventeen students participated on the project team. Team members represented five of theUniversity’s Colleges (Applied Sciences, Arts and Humanities, Business, Education, and Naturaland Health Sciences) and in particular seven academic departments (Computer and InformationScience, Electrical Engineering, Foreign Language, Speech Theater and Journalism,Management and Marketing, Physical Science and Curriculum and
given to each student: Course: This is a three-hour survey course whose aim is to give you a brief exposure to the biomedical and rehabilitation engineering field. As such, it is impossible for me to transmit any knowledge to you in detail. I hopefully will present you with a pretty good feel for the field, based on my 35 years of experience in it. To be fair, it also follows that assignments cannot have real depth. But they can be broad, and the can test the developing status of your engi- neering mind. The overview of necessity will not be comprehensive - rather an in depth look at each topic is left to other topical classes that you will take later in your academic career. In all cases we will try to integrate lectures and clinical
calibration sequence b. The control panel of the virtual RP machine d. Slices the model into layers Figure 1 a-d: The Rapid Prototyping (RP) simulator developed by University of XXXX Page 22.501.4 3To date, there is no comprehensive education model fully integrating available Internettechnologies and virtual reality into classroom with an emphasis on the improvement ofstudents’ skills in problem solving and information seeking 15. Therefore, the authorspropose to use a digital simulator based approach to explore the use of Internet for activelearning and